* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Document
Butyric acid wikipedia , lookup
Epitranscriptome wikipedia , lookup
Mitochondrion wikipedia , lookup
Photosynthesis wikipedia , lookup
Lactate dehydrogenase wikipedia , lookup
Basal metabolic rate wikipedia , lookup
Fatty acid metabolism wikipedia , lookup
Photosynthetic reaction centre wikipedia , lookup
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide wikipedia , lookup
Light-dependent reactions wikipedia , lookup
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (H+-translocating) wikipedia , lookup
Phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup
Blood sugar level wikipedia , lookup
Electron transport chain wikipedia , lookup
Microbial metabolism wikipedia , lookup
Evolution of metal ions in biological systems wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Oxidative phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup
Adenosine triphosphate wikipedia , lookup
1 Flow of glucose in E. coli Macromolecules Polysaccharides Lipids Nucleic Acids Proteins yn th e tic pa t hw ay monomers bi os intermediates glucose Each arrow = a specific chemical reaction 2 3 -2 ATP + 4 ATP = + 2 ATP 4 • • • • • So does this solve the direction problem? Only for a second … Where does this ATP come from, if we are E. coli growing in minimal medium… Glucose is the only carbon source. Need to make ATP from glucose, and this TAKES energy. Need only to regenerate ATP from ADP: Via GLYCOLYSIS, e.g. 5 Overall reaction of glycolysis to pyruvate INCLUDING the generation of ATP 1 glucose + 2 ADP + 2 Pi + 2 NAD Δ Go = -18 kcal/mole 2 pyruvate + 2 ATP + 2 NADH2 So overall reaction goes essentially completely to the right. 6 Handout 7-4b 7 The second way the cell gets a reaction to go in the desired direction: 1) A coupled reaction. One of two ways the cell solves the problem of getting a reaction to go in the desired direction Glucose + ATP glucose-6-P04 + ADP, Δ Go = -3.4 kcal/mole 2) The second way: • Removal of the product of an energetically unfavorable reaction • Uses a favorable downstream reaction • “Pulls” the unfavorable reaction • Operates on the second term of the Δ G equation. • Δ G = Δ Go + RTln([products]/[reactants]) 8 Handout 7-4b • So glucose pyruvic acid • ADP ATP, as long as we have plenty of glucose • Are we all set? • No…. What about the NAD.. We left it burdened with those electrons. • Soon all of the NAD will be in the form of NADH2 • Glycolysis will screech to a halt !! • Need an oxidizing agent in plentiful supply to keep taking those electron off the NADH2, to regenerate NAD so we can continue to run glucose through the glycolytic pathway. 9 10 Oxidizing agents around for NAD: 1) Oxygen Defer 2) Pyruvate In E. coli, humans: Pyruvate lactate, NADH2 NAD, coupled In Yeast: Pyruvate ethanol + CO2 11 12 Glucose GAL-3-P Glucose NAD 1,3-Di-PGA NADH2 Biosynthetic pathway to NAD Lactate Pyruvate excreted Handout 7-1b 13 Fermentation: anaerobiosis (no oxygen) 14 Lactate fermentation Ethanolic fermentation Mutually exclusive, depends on organism Other types, less common fermentations, exist – (e.g., propionic acid fermentation, going on in Swiss cheese) The efficiency of fermentation 15 glucose--> 2 lactates, without considering the couplings for the formation of ATP's (no energy harnessing): Δ Go = -45 kcal/mole So 45 kcal/mole to work with. Out of this comes 2 ATPs, worth 14 kcal/mol. So the efficiency is about 14/45 = ~30% Where did the other 31/45 kcal/mole go? Wasted as HEAT. Fermentation goes all the way to the right 16 glucose--> 2 lactates, without considering the couplings for the formation of ATP's (no energy harnessing): Δ Go = -45 kcal/mole kcal/mole Out of this comes 2 ATPs, worth 14 kcal/mol. So the efficiency is about 14/45 = ~30% Since 2 ATPs ARE produced, taking them into account, for the reaction: Glucose + 2 ADP + 2 Pi 2 lactate + 2 ATP ΔGo = -31 kcal/mole (45-14) Very favorable. All the way to the right. Keep bringing in glucose, keep spewing out lactate, Make all the ATP you want. That’s fermentation, for now. Energy yield But all this spewing turns out to be wasteful. Glucose could be completely oxidized, to: … CO2 That is, burned. How much energy released then? Glucose + 6 O2 6 CO2 + 6 H2O ΔGo = -686 kcal/mole ! Compared to -45 to lactate (both w/o/ ATP considered) Complete oxidation of glucose, Much more ATP But nature’s solution is a bit complicated. The fate of pyruvate is now different 17 Acetyl-CoA 18 Score: Per glucose 2 NADH 2 NADH 2 ATP 2 CO2 19 Acetyl-CoA O || CH3 - C –OH + Co-enzyme A Acetic acid, acetate Acetyl ~CoA Acetate group Acetyl-CoA Per glucose20 2 oxaloacetate 2 NADH 2 NADH 2 NADH 2 NADH 2 ATP 2 CO2 2 CO2 2 CO2 6 CO2 21 GTP is energetically equivalent to ATP GTP + ADP GDP + ATP ΔGo = ~0 G= guanine (instead of adenine in ATP) Acetyl-CoA Per glucose 22 2 oxaloacetate 2 NADH 2 NADH 2 NADH 2 NADH 2 ATP 2 ATP 2 CO2 2 CO 22 2 CO2 Succinic dehydrogenase 23 FAD = flavin adenine dinucleotide FAD + 2H. FADH2 Acetyl-CoA Per glucose24 oxaloacetate 2 NADH 2 NADH 2 NADH 2 NADH 2 FADH2 2 NADH 2 ATP 2 ATP 2 CO2 2 CO2 2 CO2 Succinic dehydrogenase 25 Per glucose 2 NADH 2 NADH 2 NADH 2 NADH 2 FADH2 2 NADH Glucose + 6 O2 6 CO2 + 6 H2O : By glycolysis plus one turn of the Krebs Cycle: 1 glucose (6C) 2 pyruvate (3C) 6 CO2 2 X 5 NADH2 and 2 X 1 FADH2 produced per glucose 4 ATPs per glucose NADH2 and FADH2 still must be reoxidized …. No oxygen yet to be consumed No water produced yet 2 CO2 2 CO2 2 CO2 2 ATP 2 ATP Oxidation of NAD by O2 26 NADH2 + 1/2 O2 --> NAD + H2O ΔGo = -53 kcal/mole If coupled directly to ADP ATP (7 kcal cost), 46 kcal/mole waste, and heat So the electrons on NADH (and FADH2) are not passed directly to oxygen, but to intermediate carriers, Each transfer step involves a smaller packet of free negative energy change (release) 27 NADH2 H H Handout 8-3 Ubiquinone; Coenzyme Q 28 Handout 8-4 29 30 Schematic idea of H+ being pumped out nal Handout 8-4 31 FoF1 complex Handout 8-4 32 Chemiosmotic theory Proton motive force (pmf) Chemical gradient Electrical gradient Electrochemical gradient Peter Mitchell 1961 Water-pump-dam analogy Some evidence: 33 Artificial phospholipid membrane H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ ETC Complex I’s pH drops NADH NADH H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ pH rises H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ 34 H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ ADP + Pi H+ ATP H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ Artificially produced mitochondrial membrane vesicle ATP is formed from ADP + Pi 35 Dinitrophenol (DNP): an uncoupler of oxidative phosphorylation - + H+ DNP’s -OH is weakly acidic in this environment DNP can easily permeate the mitochondrial inner membrane Outside the mitochondrion, where the H+ concentration is high, DNP picks up a proton After diffusing inside, where the H+ concentration low, it gives up the proton. So it ferries protons from regions of high concentration to regions of low concentration, thus destroying the proton gradient. Electron transport chain goes merrily on and on, but no gradient is formed and no ATP is produced. 36 The mechanism of ATP formation: The ATP synthetase (or ATP synthase) The F0F1 complex 37 outside inside Gamma subunit: cam ATP synthetase 38 inside outside 39 Alpha+beta Gamma 40 Motor experiment 41 Actin labeled By tagging it with fluorescent molecules Actin is a muscle protein polymer Testing the ATP synthetase motor model by running it in reverse (no H+ gradient, add ATP) 42 } ATP synthetase Run reaction in reverse, add ATP, drive counter-clockwise rotation of cam 4 3 2 1 5 ATP hydrolysis This is oxidative phosphorylation of ADP 43 44 Actin labeled By tagging it with fluorescent molecules Actin is a muscle protein polymer Testing the ATP synthetase motor model by running it in reverse 45 desktop 46 Synthase.mov movie ATP accounting • • • • • 47 Each of the 3 ETC complex (I, III, IV) pumps enough H+ ions to allow the formation of 1 ATP. So 3 ATPs per pair of electrons passing through the full ETC. So 3 ATPs per 1/2 O2 So 3 ATPs per NADH2 But only 2 ATPs per FADH2 (skips complex 1) 48 49 ATP ATP ATP Similar to handout 8-2 Handout 8-6 50 OXPHOS: 1 NADH from glycolysis Substrate level phosphorylation (SLP): 2 ATP 1ATP from Glycolysis 1 NADH from Krebs entry 3NADH from Krebs 1 FADH2 from Krebs Total: 17 ATP 1 ATP (GTP) from Krebs 5 NADH = 15 ATP 1 FADH2 = 2 ATP Grand total (E. coli): 17 + 2 = 19 per ½ glucose or 38 per 1 glucose 51 ATP accounting • 38 ATP/ glucose in E. coli • 36 ATP/glucose in eukaryotes – Cost of bringing in the electrons from NADH from glycolysis into the mitochondrion = 1 ATP per electron pair – So costs 2 ATPs per glucose, subtract from 38 to get 36 net. 52 Efficiency • 36 ATP/ glucose, worth 7 X 36 = 252 kcal/mole of glucose • ΔGo for the overall reaction glucose + 6 O2→ 6CO2 + 6 H2O: -686 kcal/ mole • Efficiency = 252/686 = 37% • Once again, better than most gasoline engines. • and Energy yield: 36 ATP/ glucose vs. 2 ATP/glucose in fermentation (yet fermentation works) • So with or without oxygen, get energy from glucose 53 Cellular location (eukaryotes): CYTOPLASM MITOCHONDRIA Handout 8-6 54 Nucleic acids Prof. Mowshowitz, next time But wait: I will be back for one more lecture (#11) on energy metabolism and intermediary metabolism