Download Chap7Alt

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Thin-slicing wikipedia , lookup

Abnormal psychology wikipedia , lookup

Behavioral modernity wikipedia , lookup

Motivation wikipedia , lookup

Applied behavior analysis wikipedia , lookup

Attribution (psychology) wikipedia , lookup

Organizational behavior wikipedia , lookup

Learning theory (education) wikipedia , lookup

Social perception wikipedia , lookup

Theory of planned behavior wikipedia , lookup

Adherence management coaching wikipedia , lookup

Theory of reasoned action wikipedia , lookup

Neuroeconomics wikipedia , lookup

Classical conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Behavior analysis of child development wikipedia , lookup

Verbal Behavior wikipedia , lookup

Social cognitive theory wikipedia , lookup

Psychological behaviorism wikipedia , lookup

Behaviorism wikipedia , lookup

Psychophysics wikipedia , lookup

Operant conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
PSY 402
Theories of Learning
Chapter 7 – Behavior & Its Consequences
Instrumental & Operant Learning
Two Early Approaches

Reinforcement Theory



Thorndike’s “Law of Effect” for cats in the puzzle
box.
Skinner boxes – rats pressing bars
Contiguity Theory


Guthrie – association is enough
Estes – Stimulus Sampling Theory
Problems with Contiguity Theory


Guthrie proposed that no reinforcement was
needed – just contiguity (closeness) in time
and place.
If learning is immediate and one-trial, why are
learning curves gradual?


Only a few stimulus elements are associated on
each trial, but more build up with each trial.
His view was wrong but influential (Estes).
Guthrie & Reinforcement


The reinforcer is salient, so it changes the
stimulus (environmental situation).
Reward keeps competing responses from
being associated with the initial stimulus.


Competing responses are instead associated with
the presence of the reward.
Fixity of cat flank-rubbing supported Guthrie
but was later shown to be related to the
presence of the experimenter instead.
Tolman’s Operational Behaviorism

His theories relied on “intervening variables”
not mechanistic S-R associations.



Behavior is motivated by goals.
Behavior is flexible, a means to an end.
Rats in mazes form cognitive maps of their
environment.

Animals learn about stimuli, not just behavior.
Evidence of Cognitive Maps

Changing the maze layout resulted in running
toward the same “goal.”


A light could have been used as a cue in both
situations.
Using a “plus maze,” some rats were trained
to always turn a certain direction, while others
were trained to reach a consistent place.

The consistent place was easier to learn.
Latent Learning

Rats were given experience in a complex
maze, without reward.



Later they were rewarded for finding the goal
box.
Performance (number of errors) improved greatly
with reward, even among previously unrewarded
rats.
Reward motivates performance, not learning.
Skinner’s Contribution



Skinner was uninterested in theory – he
wanted to see how learning works in practice.
Operant chambers permit behaviors to be
repeated as often as desired – more voluntary.
Superstitious behavior – animals were
rewarded at intervals without regard to their
behaviors.

Animals related whatever they were doing to the
reward, and wound up doing odd things.
Stimulus Control

Skinner discovered that stimuli (cues) provide
information about the opportunity for
reinforcement (reward).



The stimulus sets the occasion for the behavior.
Fading – gradually transferring stimulus
control from a simple stimulus to a more
complex one.
Operant behavior is controlled by both stimuli
and reinforcers.
Discriminative Stimuli



Discriminative stimuli act as “occasion
setters” (see Chap 5) in classical conditioning.
The stimulus that signals the opportunity for
responding and gaining a reward is SD.
The stimulus that signals the absence of
opportunity is SD.
Types of Reinforcers

Primary reinforcer – stimuli or events that
reinforce because of their intrinsic properties:


Food, water, sex
Secondary reinforcer – stimuli or events that
reinforce because of their association with a
primary reinforcer:


Money, praise, grades, sounds (clicks)
Called conditioned reinforcers.
Behavior Chains



Secondary (conditioned) reinforcers reward
intermediate steps in a chain of behavior
leading to a primary reinforcer.
Secondary reinforcers can also be
discriminative stimuli that set the occasion for
more responding.
Classical conditioning is a glue that enables
chains of behavior leading to a goal.