* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download No Slide Title
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
Climate-friendly gardening wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Emissions trading wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Reforestation wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in New Zealand wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Views on the Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup
Carbon governance in England wikipedia , lookup
Biosequestration wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Carbon emission trading wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Uncertainty in climate science: opportunities for reframing the debate Myles Allen Department of Physics, University of Oxford [email protected] trillionthtonne.org University of Oxford What they were able to agree on “…recognizing the scientific view that the increase of global temperature should be below 2 degrees Celcius…” “…deep cuts in global emissions are required … to hold the increase in global temperature below 2 degrees Celsius.” – Copenhagen Accord, 2010 trillionthtonne.org University of Oxford Why 2oC? Vulnerability of critical components of the global climate system trillionthtonne.org Lenton and Schellnhuber (2007) University of Oxford Vulnerability versus target of 2oC above preindustrial temperatures (<1.5oC above present) trillionthtonne.org Lenton and Schellnhuber (2007) University of Oxford And the not-so-good news: the impact of national pledges following Copenhagen Rogelj et al, 2010 trillionthtonne.org University of Oxford How not to avoid dangerous climate change Desperate search for the “scientific case” that 2oC means – Annex 1 emissions must drop by 25-40% by 2020, or – Long-term concentrations must stabilise at 350-450ppm. There is none: not because these targets are too ambitious, but because the problem is ill-posed. Kyoto/Copenhagen vision of scientifically-determined emission and/or concentration targets has become part of the problem. Kyoto and Wallace’s Technotrousers: Prins & Rayner, 2008 trillionthtonne.org University of Oxford Asking a different question: the story of the trillionth tonne of carbon Generate idealised CO2 emission scenarios varying: – Initial rate of exponential growth – Year in which growth begins to slow – Rate of turnaround. – Maximum rate of decline. trillionthtonne.org Simulate response using simple coupled climate carbon-cycle models. Identify properties of emission scenarios that determine peak warming. University of Oxford Cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide are the principal determinant of dangerous climate change From Allen et al, Nature, 2009 & see also Meinshausen et al, Nature, 2009 & Solomon et al, PNAS, 2009 trillionthtonne.org University of Oxford Emissions in 2020 & 2050 only matter for peak warming insofar as they determine total emissions Colours show most likely peak CO2-induced warming under various idealised scenarios. trillionthtonne.org University of Oxford Cumulative emissions determine peak warming: peak emissions determine peak warming rate BUT, limiting cumulative emissions to ~1 TtC effectively limits peak emission rate to <12 GtC/year for plausible, smooth emission trajectories. Emission rates and consequent rates of warming only really relevant to shorter-lived anthropogenic forcings. trillionthtonne.org University of Oxford Why this matters In effect, CO2 accumulates in the atmosphere. Most other greenhouse gases do not. We need to limit cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide to avoid dangerous climate change. One trillion tonnes of carbon (1 TtC) implies a most likely warming of 2oC, with a 1-σ range of 1.6-2.6oC. Postponing emissions peak to 2020 does not “commit us to 2oC”, it commits us to potentially unfeasible rates of emission reductions after 2020 if we are still to avoid 2oC. CO2 emission rates matter for rates of warming, but shorter-lived agents matter much more. trillionthtonne.org University of Oxford The heart of the problem: how fossil fuel reserves relate to atmospheric capacity Conventional and unconventional reserves Conventional oil, gas and coal Conventional oil and gas Past emissions trillionthtonne.org University of Oxford A regulatory alternative to a global emission cap or carbon tax: SAFE carbon Sequestered Adequate Fraction of Extracted (SAFE) carbon: carbon from a supply that ensures we never exceed the atmospheric capacity. So, what is an “Adequate Fraction”? – S = net carbon sequestered / carbon extracted – In the very long term, S→100%. – At present, S=0%. Simplest option: S=C/C0: – C = Cumulative emissions from the time policy is adopted. – C0= Atmospheric capacity at the time policy is adopted. If all carbon sources were SAFE, we would never exceed the atmospheric capacity. trillionthtonne.org University of Oxford What SAFE carbon means in practice: connecting A to B B A trillionthtonne.org University of Oxford Anchoring S to cumulative emissions decouples consumption from mitigation policy A1: medium population, high growth, fossil fuels dominant. A1T-R: A1T with 25% higher renewable growth after 2020, doubling nuclear capacity 2050-2100. S tied to cumulative emissions, not time S rises automatically to give the same emissions independent of fossil fuel consumption. trillionthtonne.org University of Oxford Policy implications of cumulative warming commitment There is no “fair exchange rate” between CO2 and methane: CO2 accumulates, methane does not. We need separate controls on – Short-lived gases, to avoid dangerous rates of warming – Long-lived gases, to avoid dangerous peak warming In place of a single, overarching cap-and-trade system, every sector (including the fossil fuel industry) needs to produce a road-map of how they are going to stop causing global warming before temperatures reach 2oC above pre-industrial. trillionthtonne.org University of Oxford