Download Special Report on Emission Scenario’s

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup

Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup

Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup

Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup

2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup

Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup

Michael E. Mann wikipedia , lookup

Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup

Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup

German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup

ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup

Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup

Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup

Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup

Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia , lookup

Global warming wikipedia , lookup

Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup

Climate governance wikipedia , lookup

Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup

General circulation model wikipedia , lookup

Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup

Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in Canada wikipedia , lookup

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup

Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup

Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup

Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup

Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup

Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup

Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup

Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup

Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup

Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup

Carbon capture and storage (timeline) wikipedia , lookup

Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup

Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Criticism of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup

Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The IPCC Special Report on
Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage
Your name
Your institute
Date, place
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Key issues addressed in this
presentation
• What is CO2 capture and storage?
• How could CCS play a role in mitigating climate
change?
• Maturity of the technology
• Sources of CO2 and potential reservoirs
• Cost and potential
• Health safety and environment risks
• Legal and regulatory issues
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
CO2 capture and storage system
Fuels
Processes
Storage options
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
How could CCS play a role in mitigating
climate change?
• Part of a portfolio of mitigation options
• Reduce overall mitigation costs by incresing
flexibility in achieving greenhouse gas emission
reductions
• Application in developing countries important
• Energy requirements point of attention
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Energy requirements
• Additional energy
use of 10 - 40% (for
same output)
• Capture efficiency:
85 - 95%
• Net CO2 reduction:
80 - 90%
• Assuming safe
storage
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Maturity of CCS technology
Post-combustion
Oxyfuel
combustion
Mineral
carbonation
Ocean storage
Research
phase
Pre-combustion
Industrial
separation
Transport
Enhanced
Coal Bed
Methane
Demonstration
phase
Gas and oil
fields
Industrial
utilization
Saline
formations
Enhanced Oil
Recovery
Economically
feasible under
specific conditions
Mature
market
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Qualifying CO2 sources
•
Large stationary point sources
•
High CO2 concentration in the waste, flue gas or
by-product stream (purity)
•
Pressure of CO2 stream
•
Distance from suitable storage sites
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Global large stationary CO2 sources with
emissions of more than 0.1 MtCO2/year
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Planned and current locations of
geological storage
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Current locations of geological storage
Project
name
Country
Injection
start
Daily injection
(tCO2/day)
Total planned Reservoir
storage (tCO2) type
Weyburn Canada
2000
3,000 - 5,000
20,000,000
EOR
In Salah
Algeria
2004
3,000 - 4,000
17,000,000
Gas field
Sleipner
Norway
1996
3,000
20,000,000
Saline
formation
K12B
Netherlands
2004
100
8,000,000
EGR
Frio
United States 2004
177
1,600
Saline
formation
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Geological storage
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Ocean storage
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Mineral carbonation
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Geographical relationship between
sources and storage opportunities
Global distribution of large stationary sources of CO2 (Based on a compilation of publicly available information on global emission sources, IEA
GHG 2002)
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Geographical relationship between
sources and storage opportunities
Storage prospectivity
Highly prospective sedimentary
basins
Prospective sedimentary basins
Non-prospective sedimentary
basins, metamorphic and
igneous rock
Data quality and availability vary
among regions
Prospective areas in sedimentary basins where suitable saline formations, oil or gas fields, or coal beds may be found. Locations for storage in
coal beds are only partly included. Prospectivity is a qualitative assessment of the likelihood that a suitable storage location is present in a given
area based on the available information. This figure should be taken as a guide only, because it is based on partial data, the quality of which may
vary from region to region, and which may change over time and with new information (Courtesy of Geoscience Australia).
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Costs
Two ways of expressing costs: Different outcomes:
• Additional electricity costs
– Energy policymaking
community
• CO2 avoidance costs
– Climate policymaking
community
0.01 - 0.05 US$/kWh
20* - 270 US$/tCO2 avoided
(with EOR: 0*– 240 US$/tCO2
avoided)
* low-end: capture-ready, low
transport cost, revenues from
storage: 360 MtCO2/yr
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
CCS component costs
CCS component
Cost range
Capture from a power plant
15 - 75 US$/tCO2 net captured
Capture from gas processing or
ammonia production
5 - 55 US$/tCO2 net captured
Capture from other industrial
sources
25 - 115 US$/tCO2 net captured
Transportation
1 - 8 US$/tCO2 transported per 250km
Geological storage
0.5 - 8 US$/tCO2 injected
Ocean storage
5 - 30 US$/tCO2 injected
Mineral carbonation
50 - 100 US$/tCO2 net mineralized
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Economic potential
Emissions (MtCO 2 per year)
90,000
Conservation
90,000
and Energy
MiniCAM
MESSAGE
80,000
Efficiency
80,000
70,000
70,000
60,000
60,000
50,000
Nuclear
50,000
40,000
40,000
30,000
Coal to Gas
30,000
Conservation and
Energy Efficiency
Renewable
Energy
Nuclear
Coal to Gas
Substitution
Substitution
Emissions to the atmosphere
20,000
Renewable Energy
20,000
10,000
Emissions to the atmosphere
CCS
10,000
CCS
-
2005
2020 2035
2050
2065 2080
2095
2005
Allowable
Emissions for
WRE 550
2020
2035
2050
2065
2080
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
2095
Economic potential
• Cost reduction of climate change stabilisation: 30% or more
• Most scenario studies: role of CCS increases over the course
of the century
• Substantial application above CO2 price of 25-30 US$/tCO2
• 15 to 55% of the cumulative mitigation effort worldwide until
2100
• 220 - 2,200 GtCO2 cumulatively up to 2100, depending on
the baseline scenario, stabilisation level (450 - 750 ppmv),
cost assumptions
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Health, safety, environment risks
• In general: lack of real data, so comparison with current
operations
• CO2 pipelines: similar to or lower than those posed by
hydrocarbon pipelines
• Geological storage:
– appropriate site selection, a monitoring program to detect
problems, a regulatory system, remediation methods to stop
or control CO2 releases if they arise:
– comparable to risks of current activities (natural gas storage,
EOR, disposal of acid gas)
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Health, safety, environment risks: potential leakage
from geological reservoirs and remediation
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Health, safety, environment risks
• Ocean storage:
– pH change
– Mortality of ocean organisms
– Ecosystem consequences
– Chronic effects unknown
• Mineral carbonation:
– Mining and disposal of resulting products
– Some of it may be re-used
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Ocean Storage
100%
Impacts
80%
20,000 ppm
– pH change
– Mortality of ocean organisms
– Ecosystem consequences
– Chronic effects unknown
60%
5000 ppm
Change population
40%
20%
0%
-20%
-40%
Change of bacteria, nanobenthos and
meiobenthos abundace after exposure to 20,000
and 5,000 ppm for 77-375 hrs during
experiments carried out at 2000 m depth in NW
Pacific
-60%
-80%
-100%
Bacteria
<10 mm 10-30 mm
Nanobenthos
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Meibenthos
Will leakage compromise CCS as a climate
change mitigation option?
• Fraction retained in appropriately selected and
managed geological reservoirs is
– very likely to exceed 99% over 100 years, and
– is likely to exceed 99% over 1,000 years.
"Likely" is a probability between 66 and 90%, "very likely" of 90 to 99%
• Release of CO2 from ocean storage would be gradual
over hundreds of years
• Sufficient?
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
What are the legal and regulatory issues
for implementing CO2 storage?
•
Onshore: national regulation
–
•
Few legal or regulatory frameworks for long-term
CO2 storage liabilities
Offshore: international treaties
–
–
–
OSPAR (regional), London Convention
Ocean storage and sub-seabed geological storage
Unclear whether or under what conditions CO2
injection is compatible with international law
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Thank you
Report published by
Cambridge University Press
Order at www.cambridge.org
Documents available on
www.ipcc.ch
More information:
[email protected]
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)