* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The DREAM Complex Mediates GIST Cell Quiescence and Is a
Survey
Document related concepts
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Cell growth wikipedia , lookup
Biochemical switches in the cell cycle wikipedia , lookup
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
Programmed cell death wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
The DREAM Complex Mediates GIST Cell Quiescence and Is a Novel Therapeutic Target to Enhance Imatinib-Induced Apoptosis Sergei Boichuk, Joshua A. Parry, Kathleen R. Makielski, et al. 2013; 73:5120-5129. Published OnlineFirst June 20, 2013. -Cancer Reasearch 报告人:焦鑫艳 报告时间:2014.9.17 Cancer Research (Cancer Res) 杂志,为 美国癌症研究协会 (American Association for Cancer Research, AACR) 会 刊 。 1916 年 创 刊 , 半 月 刊 , Pubmed和SCI收录。 主要发表包括基础研究、 临床前及临床、肿瘤预 防及生物治疗在内的肿 瘤学原创研究论文和综 述文章,为国际肿瘤研 究领域引用率最高的杂 志之一。 1999-2012 目前中国 人在该杂 志累计发 表343篇。 2001-2012 近四年的影响因子: 2010 2011 2012 2013 8.234 7.856 8.65 9.284 Background 1. The majority of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract , are characterized by oncogenic mutations in the KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor-a (PDGFRA) receptor tyrosine kinase. 2. GIST can be successfully treated with the small-molecule kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate (Gleevec). Complete remissions are rare and patients frequently achieve disease stabilization in the presence of residual tumor masses. 3. Discontinuation of treatment can lead to tumor progression. Residual tumor cells are quiescent, remain viable and able to re-enter the cell-division cycle. 4. This reversible exit from the cell division cycle and entry into G0 has previously been shown to involve the anaphase-promoting complex the APCCDH1 – SKP2–p27 Kip1 signaling axis. APC, together with its activator CDH1, promotes the polyubiquitylation and subsequent degradation of SKP2, a substrate adaptor component of the SCF (SKP1–Cullin–F-box) complex. SKP2 loss results in the accumulation of its target, the CDK inhibitor p27 Kip1, and the reinforcement of a quiescent state. In previous study, we could show that this process is active in imatinib-treated GIST cells. 5. A second major group of proteins that negatively regulate the cell cycle. p130 has been shown to accumulate in G0 and is regulated by SKP2. p130 interacts with E2F4 to repress E2F-dependent gene transcription. This DREAM complex is a multisubunit protein complex in mammalian, consists of DP, RBL2 (p130), E2F4 and the mammalian homologs of the Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) synthetic multivulva class B (synMuvB) core gene products LIN9, LIN37, LIN52, LIN53/RBBP4, and LIN54. Specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation–regulated kinase (DYRK), DYRK1A, mediated pLIN52-Ser28 of the DREAM component and pLIN52-Ser28 was shown to regulate complex formation in G0. 6. Imatinib induces GIST cell quiescence in vitro through the APCCDH1 –SKP2– p27 Kip1 signaling axis. 7. DREAM complex, a multisubunit complex that has recently been identified as an additional key regulator of quiescence. 8. Here, we provide evidence that imatinib induces GIST cell quiescence in vivo and that this process also involves the DREAM complex. Material The human GIST cell line GIST882 (derived from an untreated metastatic GIST) For mouse xenograft models GIST882 cells [carrying a KIT p.K642E (exon 13) mutation)] or tumors originating from the biopsies of two patients [bearing KIT p.V650D (exon 11) or KIT p.A502_Y503dup (exon 9) mutations, respectively] were implanted in both flanks of two mice. Second-passage xenografts were generated by explanting established xenografts and implanting them into the flanks of a second set of mice. Methods 1. Cell culture, inhibitor treatments, and siRNA-transfections 2. Immunologic and cell-staining methods ( Coimmunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence analysis) 3. BrdUrd assay 4. Senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity (~ staining kit) 5. Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR 6. Cell-cycle analysis (Flow Cytometry) 7. GIST xenograft models Sections 1. Imatinib induces GIST cell quiescence in vivo and in vitro. Fig1. 2 S1-S3 2. The DREAM complex is involved in imatinib-induced quiescence. Fig3 3. The DREAM complex is a modulator of the cellular response to imatinib and is a potential therapeutic target. Fig4. 5 S4 Immunofluorescence microscopic analysis Figure 1. Imatinib induces GIST cell quiescence in vivo. the quiescence marker p27 Kip1 mutation Immunohistochemical analysis Figure S1. Expression levels of its upstream regulator SKP2 do not predict p27Kip1 levels after imatinib therapy. BrdUrd incorporation Cellular proliferation detection of the percentage of cells in S-phase Figure 1. Imatinib induces GIST cell quiescence in vitro. 细 DNA合成前期(G1期) 细 胞 胞 间 DNA合成期(S期) 分 期 DNA合成后期(G2期) 裂 M期为细胞分裂期 G0期:离开细胞周期, 停止细胞分裂。 A subset of GIST cells showing morphologic signs of apoptosis during imatinib treatment and cell growth completely recovers after imatinib washout. Figure S2. Imatinib treatment leads to quiescence and not senescence in GIST cells Immunoblot analysis Figure 2. Imatinib-induced GIST cell quiescence does not prevent apoptosis upon imatinib rechallenge. Detection of KIT activation and markers of cell-cycle regulation, markers of apoptosis. Cell-cycle reentry after removal of imatinib Pretreated GIST cells retain their esponsiveness to antineoplastic activities of imatinib as suggested by previous clinical reports. No change in the percentage of senescence-associated β– galactosidase (SA β–gal) positive cells B Senescence-associated marker p16 INK4A (CDKN2A) Immunofluorescence microscopic staining Figure S3. Imatinib does not induce a senescence phenotype in these cells. DREAM complex members: p130 (accumulate in G0), E2F4, and LIN37 Immunofluorescence microscopic analyses Figure 3. The DREAM complex is involved in imatinib-induced quiescence. Enhanced formation of a complex among p130, E2F4, and LIN37 after imatinib treatment of GIST cells. Figure S4. Knockdown of single DREAM complex subunits (p130, E2F4, LIN9, LIN37, or LIN54) did not result in a significant increase of imatinib-induced GIST cell apoptosis E2F4/LIN54 knockdown enhanced GIST cell apoptosis. Inhibition of efficient DREAM complex formation resulted in increased baseline proliferation. Figure 4. LIN52 is activated by imatinib and attenuates its proapoptotic activities. pLIN52-S28 increased. Basal expression of DYRK1A and LIN52 remained unchanged. p-LIN52 and DREAM complex formation were reversible after removal of imatinib. A cell-cycle arrest in G2–M in LIN52-depleted GIST cells. A statistically significant increase of apoptosis. Figure 5. Inhibition of DYRK1A enhances imatinib-induced GIST cell apoptosis. DYRK1A is a protein kinase. DYRK1A inhibitor harmine markers of apoptosis (PARP cleavage, cleaved caspase 3) and quiescence (p130) DAPI stain morphologically apoptotic cells to detect Here, we show that 1.Imatinib induces GIST cell quiescence in vivo and in vitro. 2. This process involves the DREAM complex as evidenced by upregulation of p130, increased p130/E2F4/LIN37 complex formation, and enhanced phosphorylation of the DREAM subunit LIN52. 3. Importantly, inhibition of DREAM complex formation, abrogation of quiescence by siRNA-mediated knock-down of LIN52 or the DYRK1A kinase were both found to significantly increase imatinib-induced GIST cell apoptosis. 4. Therefore, interference with DREAM-mediated quiescence can enhance imatinib-induced apoptosis and anti-GIST cell activity, which emphasizes the relevance of the DREAM complex as novel drug target for more efficient imatinib responses. 谢 谢!