* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Gene Expression
Epigenetics in learning and memory wikipedia , lookup
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis wikipedia , lookup
Primary transcript wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Cancer epigenetics wikipedia , lookup
Long non-coding RNA wikipedia , lookup
Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup
Gene desert wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Mir-92 microRNA precursor family wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Diagnostically and Prognostically Significant Genetic Alterations in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Friederike Kreisel, MD Department of Pathology and Immunology Washington University in St. Louis Frequency of B-and T-Cell Lymphomas Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Follicular Lymphoma 8.6% 11.7% 2.5% 33% 6.0% Mantle Cell Lymphoma Burkitt Lymphoma 6.7% 9.4% Marginal Zone B-cell Lymphoma CLL/SLL 22.1% T-cell Lymphomas Other Types Incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) has increased more than 73% between 1973 and 1991 Estimated rate for DLBCL is ~4.68 cases per 100,000 persons/year Normal B-Cell Differentiation NEJM 2000, 343;108-117 The Germinal Center Lymph node Germinal Center CD10+/BCL-6+/BCL-2- NEJM 2000, 343;108-117 Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma • Usually de novo (primary) • Transformation from: – CLL/SLL – Follicular lymphoma • Immunodeficiency is strongest known risk factor WHO 2008, Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma • Clinically, morphologically, and genetically heterogenous group with only a subset falling into the WHO subcategories • 20-30% of DLBCL continue to be defined by their nuclear size only DLBCL Subcategories (WHO 2008) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, NOS T-cell/histiocyte rich DLBCL Primary DLBCL of CNS Primary cutaneous DLBCL, leg type EBV positive DLBCL of the elderly Primary mediastinal (thymic) LBCL Intravascular LBCL DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation Lymphomatoid granulomatosis ALK-positive LBCL Plasmablastic lymphoma LBCL arising in HHV8+ multicentric Castleman’s disease Primary effusion lymphoma B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable International Prognostic Index (IPI) most commonly used to predict outcome in DLBCL • Unfavorable variables – Age >60 years – Poor performance status (ECOG2) – Advanced Ann Arbor stage (III-IV) – Extranodal involvement 2 sites – High serum LDH (>normal) Risk group Low Low/intermediate High/intermediate High Unfavorable variables All patients Patients60 0 or 1 0 2 3 4 or 5 1 2 3 Major Recurring Genetic Events in DLBCL Genetic Defect Frequency Location BCL6 35-40% 3q27 BCL2 18q21 cMYC t(14;18) 13%, amplification 24% 15% FAS(CD95) 20% 10q24 Aberrant SHM 45% Genes aberrantly targeted: BCL6, cMYC, PAX5 TP53 16% 17p 8q24 BCL6 • Zinc-finger transcription repressor normally expressed within germinal center (GC) B-cells BCL6 null animals fail to generate GCs in response to antigen • Constitutive expression of BCL6 might the p53mediated apoptosis, promoting persistence of malignant clones Wikipedia BCL2 • Proto-oncogene located at 18q21 that promotes B-cell survival via inhibition of apoptosis and confers chemotherapy resistance • BCL-2 expression is normally down-regulated in the GC where apoptosis plays a critical role in negative B-cell selection • t(14;18) fusion gene leading to transcription of levels of BCL2 Wikipedia Gene Expression Profiling • Measurement of the activity (expression) of thousands of genes at once relative amount of mRNA expressed provides a global picture of cellular function Gene Expression Profiling • Highlight similarities between subsets of DLBCL and normal B cells • Define robust and highly reproducible DLBCL subtypes with comprehensive transcriptional signatures • Identify features associated with unfavorable responses to empiric combination chemotherapy DNA Microarray - Methodology DLBCL1 – DLBCL2 – – + + – + + + LYMPHOCHIP Slides are coated with polyLysine, which is positively charged. DNA is negatively charged, so it “sticks” to the slide through ionic interaction LYMPHOCHIP cDNA is made from different DLBCL tumors DNA Microarray - Methodology DLBCL1 DLBCL1 DLBCL2 LYMPHOCHIP Both sets of DLBCL cDNA are labelled with different fluorescent tags, in this case red and green DLBCL2 LYMPHOCHIP Gene array lymphochip is incubated with the tagged DLBCL cDNAs, which bind to the matching genes printed on the array DNA Microarray - Methodology DLBCL1 DLBCL2 LYMPHOCHIP Since positions of the genes on the DNA array are known, levels of gene expression can be figured out based on color signal. If the gene is only expressed in DLBCL1, the square is red; if the gene is only expressed in DLBCL2, the square is green; if the gene is equally expressed in both DLBCL, the square is yellow. Gene Expression Profiling in DLBCL (Alizadeh et al., Nature 2000) Ratio of hybridization of fluorescent experimental mRNA to fluorescent pooled reference mRNA Gene Expression Profiling in DLBCL (Alizadeh et al., Nature 2000) a. b. c. Hierarchical clustering of DLBCL (orange and blue) and germinal center B cells (black) based on the genes of the germinal center B-cell gene expression signature Discovery of genes that are selectively expressed in GC B-like DLBCL and activated B-like DLBCL based on genes of pan B-cells, germinal center B-cells, and activated B-cells Hierarchical clustering of the genes selectively expressed in GC B-like DLBCL and activated B-like DLBCL, which was determined from Fig 3b Differences Between GC-like and Activated B-like DLBCL GC B-like DLBCL Activated B-like DLBCL Cell of origin Germinal center B-cell Postgerminal center Bcell Chromosomal alterations t(14;18); gains of 12q Gains of 3q and 18q21-22; deletion of 6q21-q22, BCL6 translocations Oncogenic mechanisms BCL2 translocation; amplification of cREL locus Constitutive NFkB activation Ongoing Ig mutation Yes No IHC Expression of CD10, BCL-6 Expression of MUM1 Clinical outcome Favorable (60% 5-year survival) Poor (35% 5-year survival) Overall survival of DLBCL patients grouped on the basis of gene profiling shows worse outcome for patients with “activated B-like” subtype A.A. Alizadeh et al. Nature 2000; 403:503-511 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) can be used to determine the GC B-like and Activated B-like subtypes of DLBCL Normal Lymph Node CD10 BCL-6 GC B-like DLBCL Activated B-like/non-GC B-like DLBCL C.P. Hans et al. Blood 2004, 103:275-282 Overall survival curves comparing immunohistochemical and genetic classification of GC B-like and activated B-like DLBCL are worse for the activated B-like subtype C.P. Hans et al. Blood 2004, 103:275-282 Decision Tree for IHC Classification of DLBCL C.P. Hans et al. Blood 2004, 103:275-282 • Sensitivity of IHC 71% for the GC B-like group and 88% for the activated B-like / non GC B-like group • PPV of IHC was 87% for the GC B-like group and 73% for the activated B-like / non GC B-like group • 30/142 (21%) of cases had discordant IHC and cDNA microarray results Does the type of therapy for DLBCL affect prognosis in patients? • Drugs in CHOP: – – – – C = Cyclophosphamide H = Doxorubicin (Hydroxydaunomycin) O = Vincristine Sulfate (Oncovin) P = Predisone • Drugs in R-CHOP (since 2000): – – – – – R = Rituximab C = Cyclophosphamide H = Doxorubicin (Hydroxydaunomycin) O = Vincristine Sulfate (Oncovin) P = Predisone Rituximab • CD20 antigen Human IgG1 constant region B-cell CD20 Human k constant region Murine antigen binding domain – Expressed only on B-cells – Present in >90% of B-cell lymphomas – Does not shed off cell surface – Important for cell cycle initiation and differentiation Effects of Rituximab • Mediates antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity • Elicits shedding of CD23 • Down-regulates the B-cell receptor • Induces apoptosis of CD20+ cells • Half-life of 30-400 hours (varies by dose and length of treatment) OS Curves of Patients with GC B-Like and Activated B-like DLBCL by IHC After CHOP or R-CHOP Treatment R. Seki et al. Cancer Sci 2009, 100:1842-47 The overall survival rates for control and immunochemotherapy-treated DLBCL patients according to immunohistochemical and clinical factors CHOP R-CHOP R-CHOP H. Nyman et al. Blood 2007;109:4930-4935 The Hans Classifier – Controversies in the CHOP and R-CHOP Era Hans et al. Blood 2004 Berglund et al. Mod Path 2005 Haarer et al. Arch Pathol 2006 Muris et al. J Pathol 2006 Survival association present Sjo et al. Eur J Hematol 2007 Van Imhoff et al. J Clin Oncol 2007 Nyman et al. Blood 2007 Amara et al. Mod Pathol 2008 Fu et al. JCO 2008 (R-CHOP) Colomo et al. Blood 2003 Nyman et al. Blood 2007 (R-CHOP) De Paepe et al. JCO 2005 Dupuis et al. Haematologica 2007 Survival association absent Natkunam et al. JCO 2008 Veelken et al. Ann Oncol 2007 Amen et al. Histopathology 2007 Wilson et al. JCO 2008 (DE-EPOCH-R) Ott et al. Leukemia Research 2012 (R-CHOP) Transcriptional Profile of DLBCL Subsequently Treated with R-CHOP J.P. Jais et al. Leukemia 2008;22:1917-24 The recognition of GCB and ABC DLBCL is highly reproducible by gene expression profiling between different centers Center A Center B GCB Unclass ABC GCB 53 3 0 Unclass 3 16 2 ABC 0 3 48 Concordant results in 117/128 (91%) Unpublished data from Elias Campo, MD Prognostic Impact of Gene Alterations in DLBCL in the Era of Rituximab • MYC gene rearrangements • CDKN2A (p16INK4/p14ARF) and CDKN2B (p15INK4) deletions • p53 aberrations cMYC • Located on 8q24 • Regulates gene expression through binding on Enhancer Box sequences and recruiting histone acetyl-transferases • Burkitt lymphoma t(8;14) cMYC gene next to the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus fusion gene causing overexpression of MYC protooncogene in lymphoma cells Wikipedia Outcomes of Patients with MYC+ or MYC- DLBCL • 135 cases of DLBCL analyzed • 12/134 cases (8.8%) were positive for MYC rearrangement • All patients were treated with R-CHOP K.J. Savage et al. Blood 2009; 114:3533-37 CDKN2A/B (p16,p14,p15) • Located on 9p21.3 • Tumor suppressor gene that regulates cell cycle via the retinoblastoma and p53 apoptosis pathways • Defective p53/CDKN2A/B signaling can lead to apoptosis resistance in DLBCL Kreisel et al. Cancer Genetics 2010;204:129-37 TP53 • Located on 17p13.1 • Tumor suppressor gene • “The guardian of the genome” • p53 is in reference to its molecular weight (53-kDa protein) • 50% of human tumors contain a mutation or deletion of the TP53 gene Wikipedia OS according to the TP53 and CDKN2A allelic status in DLBCL. (A) Overall survival (OS) probability in the entire lymphoma population (n = 114). (B) OS probability in the R-CHOP treated subgroup (n=78) Jardin F et al. Blood 2010;116:1092-1104 Schematic representation of the 9p21 locus and its genomic alterations detected by a dedicated quantitative multiplex PCR of short fragments (QMPSF) assay in DLBCL. CDKN2A/B p16 p14 p15 Jardin F et al. Blood 2010;116:1092-1104 Gray: heterozygous deletion Black: homozygous deletion Summary • DLBCL represents a morphologically, biologically, and clinically heterogenous group of tumors • ~20-30% of DLBCL cannot be subcategorized into a current WHO subclassification • Despite DLBCL subcategories clinical outcome within a specific category is heterogenous • Genetic alterations of BCL-6, BCL-2, and c-MYC are among the most common recurrent genetic abnormalities Summary • Gene expression profiling of DLBCL offered – Comparison of gene signatures between subsets of DLBCL and normal B cells – Delineation of robust and highly reproducible DLBCL subtypes with comprehensive transcriptional signatures (GC-like vs. activated-like DLBCL) – Identification of gene expression signatures associated with unfavorable response to empiric combination chemotherapy Summary • Immunohistochemical sub-categorization into GC-like vs. non GC B-type in Rituximab era remains controversial, although robust with cDNA microarray • Additionally, c-MYC, TP53, and CDKN2A/B aberrations appear to have prognostic significance in Rituximab era Journal Club 4/10/12 Aim of study • Show that the variability in natural history of DLBCL reflects unrecognized molecular heterogeneity in the tumors • Measure the activity (expression) of thousands of genes at once (DNA microarrays) • Identify molecularly distinct subgroups of DLBCL • Correlate different subgroups with clinical outcome Construction of DNA microarray • “Lymphochip”: selection of genes that are preferentially expressed in lymphoid cells and genes with known or suspected roles in immunology or cancer – 12,069 out of 17,856 cDNA from a germinal center Bcell library – 2,338 cDNA from libraries derived from DLBCL, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia – cDNA from genes that are induced or repressed during B- and T-cell-lymphocyte activation by mitogens or cytokines – 3,186 genes of importance to lymphocyte and/or cancer biology cDNA Microarray - Methodology Experimental sample Experimental sample Reference pool of 9 different lymphoma cell lines 17,856-GENE ARRAY LYMPHOCHIP Reference pool of 9 different lymphoma cell lines 17,856-GENE ARRAY LYMPHOCHIP The fluorescence ratio was quantified for each gene and reflected the relative abundance of the gene in each experimental mRNA sample compared to the reference pool Each row: separate cDNA clone on the microarray Each column: separate experimental mRNA sample Results: ratio of hybridization of fluorescent experimental mRNA to fluorescent pooled reference mRNA Figure 1 dendrogram Figure 2 “Proliferation signature”, a quantitative measurement of tumor cell proliferation, confers an inferior survival “Germinal center B-cell signature” with BCL-6 and CD10 expression “Lymph node survival signature” host response to lymphoma, is associated with survival times Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5