* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download viral networks
Molecular evolution wikipedia , lookup
Histone acetylation and deacetylation wikipedia , lookup
Silencer (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression wikipedia , lookup
Ancestral sequence reconstruction wikipedia , lookup
Protein (nutrient) wikipedia , lookup
Magnesium transporter wikipedia , lookup
List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Protein folding wikipedia , lookup
Protein structure prediction wikipedia , lookup
Endogenous retrovirus wikipedia , lookup
Intrinsically disordered proteins wikipedia , lookup
Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup
Protein domain wikipedia , lookup
Gene regulatory network wikipedia , lookup
Western blot wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Herpesviral Protein Networks and Their Interaction with the Human Proteome Presentation by: Kyle Borge, David Byon, & Jim Hall reconstruction of a Herpes Virus capsid Presentation by: Kyle Borge, David Byon, & Jim Hall Introduction to the Herpesvirus • Large double-stranded DNA genomes • Eight different strains • Causes diseases ranging from cold sores to shingles • Vaccine available for Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV) • Little known about protein interactions Types of Herpesviruses Investigated • Kaposi’s Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus (KSHV) – – – – – – In the gamma (γ) herpes virus phylogenetic class Causes cancerous tumors Mostly associated with HIV patients Sequenced in 1996 Genome is roughly 165 kbs 89 open reading frames (ORFs) • 113 ORFs used in experiment (included 15 cytoplasmic and 5 external domains derived from transmembrane proteins) • Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV) , in the alpha (α) herpesvirus phylogenetic class – Causes chicken pox in children and shingles in adults – Sequenced in 1986 – Genome is roughly 125 kbs – 69 open reading frames (ORFs) • 96 ORFs used in experiment (Included 13 cytoplasmic and 10 external domains derived from transmembrane proteins) Methods of Investigating Protein Protein Interactions (PPI) • Many Methods • The Y2H technique is one of the top techniques for detecting protein-protein interactions • This article used Y2H to investigate proteinprotein interactions Y2H Advantages • • Relatively simple (automated) • Quick • Inexpensive http://www.dnatube.com/video/993/Plasmid• Only need the sequenced genome (or sequence of Cloning interest) • Scalable, its possible to screen for interactions among many proteins creating a more high-throughput screen (ex. viral genome) • Protein/polypeptides can be from various sources; eukaryotes, prokaryotes, viruses and even artificial sequences…allows the comparison of interactomes w/in and between different species…in this paper, eukaryote (human) interactome vs. viral interactome Y2H Limitations • The Y2H system cant analyze some classes of proteins • Transmembrane proteins, specifically their hydrophobic regions which may prevent the protein from reaching the nucleus • http://www.dnatube.com/video/993/Plasmid• Transcriptional activators; may activate transcription w/out any Cloning interaction • False-negatives • Y2H screen fails to detect a protein-protein interactions • False-positives • Y2H screen produces a positive result (characterized by reporter gene activity) where no protein-protein interaction took place Ex. bait proteins activate, transcribing the reporter gene, w/out the binding of the AD (bait proteins act as transcriptional activators) Yeast’s GAL4 transcriptional activator • GAL4 transcriptional activator which splits into two separate fragments; a binding domain (BD) and an activating domain (AD) Y2H Method • ORFs selected from published sequences • Amplified by nested PCR – Made primer sets of ends of ORFs • Y2H bait and prey vectors • Vectors transformed into Y187 and AH109 haploid yeast cells creating pools; a bait pool and a prey pool • Bait and prey mated in quadruplicates • Positive diploid yeasts are selected Open Reading Frames (ORFs) • Every ORFs of both KSHV & VZV were cloned & ligated into both a bait and prey GAL4 vector • Bait – protein of interest – the protein is fused to the yeast Gal4 DNA-binding domain (DBD) • Prey – a protein/ORF fused to the Gal4 transcriptional activation domain (AD) – interacting protein • Physical interaction between the bait and prey brings the DNA-BD and an AD of Gal4 together, thus re-creating a transcriptionally active Gal4 hybrid • Gal4 activity can be assayed by the expression of reporter genes and selectable markers (1-2) ORFs cloned into vectors via Nested PCR • KSHV – 113 full-length and partial ORFs • including 15 cytoplasmic and 5 external domains derived from transmembrane proteins • VZV – 96 full-length and partial ORFs • including 13 cytoplasmic and 10 external domains derived from transmembrane proteins Yeast-Two-Hybrid Prey pool: (target) •Each individual ORF sequence is cloned into the ‘prey’ vector (down stream of the GAL4 AD gene) and is essentially fused to the GAL4 AD gene •Ampr for selection •Hemagglutinin Bait pool: •Each individual ORF sequence is also cloned into the ‘bait’ vector (down stream of the GAL4 DBD gene) and is essentially fused to the GAL4 DBD gene •vector conveys Kanr for selection Yeast-Two-Hybrid Background …in a diploid cell. Viral Protein Interactions in KSHV •12,000 Viral Protein Interactions tested •Identified 123 nonredundant interacting protein pairs •118/123 were novel •7/123 were previously reported •Screen captures 5/7 (71%) of previously reported interactions •50% of Y2H interactions confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation (CoIP) Viral Protein Interactions in KSHV Previously Reported Protein Interactions of KSHV Coimmunoprecipitation Verification of Predicted Interactions in other Herpesvirus Species Correlation Between Viral Protein Interaction and Expression Profile •Average expression correlation [AEC]was calculated •For random pairs of ORFs: 0.804 •For interacting pairs of ORFs: 0.839 •Correlation between AEC and clustering coefficient •Used to propose static or dynamic interaction for viral hubs Protein Interaction Networks Network Terminology • • • • • • • • • Node – represents a protein Edge – represents interaction between two nodes Average (node) degree – the average number of neighbors or connections that any given node has Power coefficient (g) – derived from an approximate power law degree distribution plotted on a bilogarithmic scale and fitted by linear regression P value - (significance under linear regression) as fitted by a power-law degree distribution (‘‘scale-free’’ property) Characteristic path length – the distance between two nodes Diameter (d) - describes the interconnectedness of a network; defined as the average length of the shortest paths between any two nodes in the network Clustering coefficient – A value given to depict the number of fold enrichment over comparable random networks (‘‘small-world’’ property) Small world property/network – Any network that has characteristics of a relatively short path and dense cluster (high cluster coefficient) Topology of KSHV and VZV Interaction Network KSHV protein interaction network VZV protein interaction network Comparison of Protein Interaction Networks Power Law Distribution Comparison • http://www.dnatube.com/video/993/PlasmidCloning Removal of Nodes in KSHV Network Protein Interaction KSHV & Sequence Conservation to EBV Correlation Between Functional and Phylogenetic Herpesviral Classes Viral protein interactions between functional classes • http://www.dnatube.com/video/993/PlasmidCloning Viral Protein Interactions Between Phylogenetic Classes View of the Human-Herpesviral Networks Varicella-Zoster Virus Kaposi Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus Power Coefficient of KSHV-Human Network Interplay between KSHV and Human Network Viral Host Network / Random Network Comparison Conclusions • Virus and host interactomes possess distinct network topologies • Integration of viral and host protein network may lead to better understanding of viral pathogenicity • Future interactome data from other viruses may improve understanding of functions of viral proteins and their phylogeny • Understanding networks may help to develop future therapies