* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download TWENTY YEARS COMBATING GLOBAL WARMING IN FRANCE
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Climate Change conference wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in New Zealand wikipedia , lookup
Views on the Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
2015-12 SECTION FOR ENVIRONMENT TWENTY YEARS COMBATING GLOBAL WARMING IN FRANCE: PUBLIC POLICY ASSESSMENT AND OUTLOOK G lobal emissions of the six greenhouse gasses (GHG) have increased by 80% since 1970 and by 30% since 1990. The IPCC predicts global warming scenarios ranging between + 1.8° C and + 6.4° C by 2100. To prevent major repercussions for human society and ecosystems this increase must be limited to + 2° C. Accordingly, emissions must be swiftly and sharply reduced. In the EU, total GHG emissions fell by 19% between 1990 and 2012. In France, the decline, started in 2000 was - 13% for the same period. However, the carbon footprint of French citizens has increased between 1990 and 2007. Contact: [email protected] - +33 (0)1 44 43 62 27 Reducing GHG involves a number of factors. Efforts to reduce GHG means changes to jobs, qualifications, and work organisation. In a globalised economy, this may penalise certain sectors in the short term. Ecosystems restoration plays a role in combating global warming. In 2005, France set itself the goal of a fourfold reduction in its GHG emissions by 2050. The ESEC supports this goal. Achieving it requires a method. This is currently being worked on. The draft legislation on energy transition sets in place a low-carbon strategy and five-yearly "carbon budgets". Climate policy, which is closely linked to energy policy, cannot be limited to these measures alone, just as it cannot be limited to CO2. It must include other major non-energy emissions sectors. The circle of actors implicated is steadily growing wider. The interest The question now becomes how to limit average global temperature increase to 2° C by 2100. shown in energy issues, the setting in place of economic incentives and also the international dynamic and the increasing power of environmental dialogue have led the majority of civil society organisations to embrace the climate issue. The majority of economic sectors are now involved in steps to combat climate change, with each sector serving as a specific source of GHG emissions reduction. Local governments have progressively taken the issue on board. In 2009, local and regional climate change policies began to be implemented on a massive scale. This has made possible the sustainable local actions needed in order to change behaviours. French society must go beyond the awareness stage and scale up its response capabilities. It therefore appears that the supporting of change is a priority. Global warming is redistributing the playing cards. France is among the leading nations in the reduction of its GHG emissions. In the race to combat climate change, it has good reason to remain one of the leaders. The COP 21 Forum is an exceptional opportunity to stimulate climate change policy in France, while ensuring that the momentum continues beyond 2015. 30% That's the amount by which global GHG emissions have risen since 1990. For the same period, EU emissions declined by 19% and, since 2000, they have declined by 13% in France. Gaël Virlouvet is adminstrator of the French federation of associations for the protection of nature and the environment (France Nature Environnement) and president of the branch of this federation in the Ile-et-Vilaine department. Within the ESEC, he is a member of the Section for Environment and the Section for Economy and Finance. He represents the ESEC on France's Committee for Green Economy (Comité pour l’économie verte). Contact: [email protected] +33 (0)1 44 43 62 27 ESEC PROPOSALS The recommendations are informed by three major objectives: to support French society in the run up to COP 21, to secure the participation of every individual in the mitigation policy, and to help bring about a low-carbon society. SUPPORT FRENCH SOCIETY IN THE RUN UP TO COP 21 • The priority now is to debate whether or not it is feasible to keep the increase in average global temperature below 2° C, rather than the responsibility of humans in climate change. The public requires reliable information on climate issues, backed up by a reference information base. • French society needs direction and confidence in the future. The government must therefore highlight the capacity for collective action on climate change which must be placed within a European and a global context. • The run up to COP 21 must be used to draw together and promote the know-how developed by France in combating climate change. • Given that the regional elections will run alongside COP 21, the ESEC wishes to encourage candidates and political parties to espouse the climate issue. SECURE THE PARTICIPATION OF EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN THE MITIGATION POLICY • Cutting greenhouse gas emissions concerns us all. It requires far-reaching changes which depend both on the long-term endorsement of a policy direction and on spurring into action as many actors as possible. • The ESEC invites the government to work to educate the public, from the standpoint of the pledge of a fourfold reduction in emissions by 2050, regarding the progress that has been made, but also the procrastination and backsliding that has occurred, and the decisions that have been taken, both nationally and internationally. • The ESEC encourages the press to keep climate issues in the media. We must find out more about the complementarity of steps taken at various levels, from the most global to the most local. • The ESEC recommends increasing "climate change" content in the national curriculum. It would like to see national communications campaigns on the issue continued and scaled up. • The ESEC recommends stimulating French research on supporting the transition to lower GHG emissions. • The ESEC would like to see the leadership role played by inter-communal bodies over each territory's stakeholders made more formal. The regions, together with the French Environment and Energy Management Agency (ADEME), must step up their leadership role over communal authorities. • The ESEC recommends that experiments by territories should be analysed in order to formulate an incentive-providing framework for day-to-day practices that can help to combat climate change. View the full opinion at www.lecese.fr HELP BRING ABOUT A LOW-CARBON SOCIETY • The ESEC calls for greater transparency in governance of the national "climate" policy. There must be a designated forum for dialogue to ensure this is monitored. The ESEC takes the view that responsibility for inter-ministerial climate policy should fall first and foremost to the Prime Minister. This must take the form of an annual presentation to Parliament of France's energy policy. • The ESEC recommends that the State should manage carbon budgets so that the efforts that need to be made to reach a fourfold reduction in emissions by 2050 can be spread over time. The decade 2020-2030 will need to see a very marked acceleration in GHG emissions reduction. • The ESEC takes the view that specific work must be undertaken on the links between climate and spacial planning from three standpoints: land use, French industrial planning and urban planning. • The ESEC calls on the government to move beyond the first step which was the Environmental Conference of 2014 and to launch a public consultation on mobility and transport. • The ESEC takes the view that the path we must follow is one of increasing responsibility at the territorial level for GHG emissions. The role of territorial climate policy in the national low-carbon strategy must be made clearer. • Finally, the ESEC wishes to encourage France to take the offensive in the global race to combat climate change: by promoting the solutions set out in this opinion and by monitoring solutions being developed in other countries..