* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Differential stimulation of IL-6 secretion following apical and
Survey
Document related concepts
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Cell growth wikipedia , lookup
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup
Cell membrane wikipedia , lookup
Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Endomembrane system wikipedia , lookup
Interleukin 6 wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Biochemical Soclety Transactlons ( 1 996) 24 - Differential stimulation of IG6secretion following apical and basol.ted presentation of IL-1 on epithelial cdl lines. CATHETUNA O’SHAUGHNESSY,ENAPROSSm TRACY KEANE AND LUKEO’NEILL’ Elan Corporation Research In?i.tute, Trinity College, Dublin 2. ’BiochemistryDepartment, T m t y College, Dublin 2, Ireland. IL-1 is a classic pro-inflammatory cytokine[l). Its biological effects are shared by two functionally active forms ILl a and IL-Ip[l]. In humans the primary source of IL-1 is the macro@age although a variety of other cell types can make IL-1 includmg endothelial cells, astro es, NK cells and dendritic cells[2]. IL-1 has a diverse range g a r g e t tissues and manifests a range of activitiesinclud+g actvation of T cells to express CD25 and produce IL-2, stmulation of fibroblast prolifmon, indu.ction, of PG and LT synthesis, indu@on of B cell prolferaaon and maturation and uprepiahon of adhesion molecule expression on vascular endothehal cells[2]. Equivocal results on the ression of II,- 1 mRNA in epithelial cells may be explained b d x e n t antigenic stimuli 3,4]. Its role has not yet been fuuy (retermined in epithelial cell iology. A key feature of the ro lnflammato effects of IL-1 is the induction of other C y t O L i including% -6. In addition to its importance in B cell growth and differentiation IL-6 plays a major role in the acute phase response elicited by +sue trauma. IL-6 d i r e l y stimulates acute hase rotem synthesis by hepatocytes both in VIVO and in vitro In tks study we have examined three human carcinoma cell lines for IL-6 secretion in response to IL-1 stimulation: ECV304 is y endothelial cell line, Calu-3 is a lun epithelialdenved cell hne and CaCo-2. an intestmal epithelial c$ h e . AU three cell pries were cultured on Costar tissue culture 24-well plates (1x10 celldwell). The epithelial cell lines Calu-3 and CaCo-2, were also cultured in the Costar Transwell” system. When grown at hi density in the Transwelle stem, they form a structura~yan f~nctiona~y polarized epigeliai mawlayer (Fig. 1), characterised by having distinguishable membranes: apical and basolateral (basal-lateral). The apical membrane is covered by microvilli and contains ion-transporters, glycolipids and GPI linked proteins. The basal membrane is involved in cellsubstratum interactions and has basement membrane receptors and hemi-desmosornes. The lateral membrane is involved in cell@ *teractions and contains desmosomes,, gap, juneons, tight junctrons and cell adhesion molecules. The ti JunctrOn forms a structural boundary between the apical and asolateral domains and plays a role in the restriction of lipid diffusion and s e p a a o n of some,etegral membrane ,proteins.,The polarized ce monolaver exhlbits a transepithehai electrical rmstance which can be measured as an indication of how ‘tight’ a monolayer is. Both CaCo-2 and Calu-3 show transepithelial resistances in excess of 300Ncm‘. An added advantage of the Transwell* s stem is that it allows access to both apical and basal membranes &r stimulation and sampling. It is the classic system used to studv drug and ion transport bv cells. Fiqurc 1. Costar Tnnrwcll’ S-. i 4. P f? ~ Cells gown on 24-well lates were stmulated wth vanous concentrations of IL-I d e r 24 hours the supemtams were collected and assayed for IL6 usmg the ‘Duoset ELISA Kit’ (&myme) IL-6 secretion was found to be dosedependent. eakmg when stmulated with 50n ml IL-I and decreasng wth stmulation concentrations (fig 2) Both ECV304 secreted I- ngml IL-6 in response to 30ngml IL-1 Calu-3 however, produced more than 10 times thts amount This r o w was also shown to be IL-1 s p d c ie the effect was b l z e d by the IL-l receptor antagorust (data not shown) RIP Zoo00 - p\ 83s c m cab-2 Ecv304 mm 00 20 40 60 80 loo 120 140 160 [IL-I] n g / d Figure 2 Sub-confluent cells were samulated wth IL-I at the m&cated conccnmaon The supernatants were collened after 24 hours and assaved for IL-6 content CONCENTRATION OF IL-6 DETECTED IN CULTURE SUPERNATANT (pg/ml) cab3 CnCe2 &/ basolateral &I Baselme 2559 5902 240 071 Samulaaon 59657 8427 16224 110 basolateral Basolaieral Sumulaaon 7808 7 2991 7 5232 474 Table 1 Cell monolavers were stundated wth L-ia (30neJml) for 24 hours Supematants were then asMyod for IL-6wntent Cells grown in the Trapwell” system were stimulated either apically or basolaterally w t h 30n ml IL-I. Mer 24 hours !he supematants were assayed for -6 content using the Quanfikine ELISA Kit’ (R&D Systems). This was crossvalidated with Genzyme’s assa Once again, Calu-3 were more responsive to IL-I in term ofL-6 secretion. a-6secretion was found to be redominantly from the a ical membrane irrapedve of apical or L o t a t 4 F d a t i o n c f h l e 1). ~ntqresting~y,, caly3 appear to constitutively secrete IL-6. %s secretton is differential ie. four times higher a ically than basolatdly and may reflect endo enous levels of otRer aanpnatory mediators. dif€erence was observed III both the levels of A constitutive IL-6 secretion and the response to IL-1 stimulation by Calu-3 versus CaCo-2 cells. This may rdect the increased sensitivity to a pro-inflammatory response which is F j a t e d with pulmonary (Calu-3) rather than intestinal epithehal tissue (CaCo-2). T h e e results demonstrate for the first time IL-1 induced IL-6 secretion by lung thehaldenved cells (Calu-3 . The higher levels of secreted r - 6 apically versus basolatmdy may suggest compartmentalisationof the inflammatory response m the lung. fi This work was supported by Elan Corporation O’Neill. A.J (1994) Biochim.Biophys.Acta. 1266:31-44 Durum, S.K.. Schmidt. J.A. and Oppenheim, J.J. (1985) Ann.Rev.Immuno1.3263-287. Jun ,H C , Eckmann, L., Yan ,S K ,Pan’a, A.: Fierer, J., Wrotleski E.M. and Kagnoff,b.F. (1995j J.Cb.Invest. 95:55-65 Le. P.T., Lazorick.S., Whichard,L.P.,Ha es,B.F. and Singer, K.H. (1991) J.ExpMed.l74:114fi157. Van Snick, J. (1990) Ann.Rev Immunol. 8253-278.