* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download SB 14-66 Climate Change: The Latest United
Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Michael E. Mann wikipedia , lookup
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Criticism of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Physical impacts of climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Canada wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
The Sc ottish Parliament and Scottis h Parliament Infor mation C entre l ogos . SPICe Briefing Climate Change: The Latest United Nations Science 30 September 2014 14/66 Dan Barlow Under the auspices of the United Nations, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides a regular assessment of the science of climate change. This briefing summarises the findings of three IPCC reports published in 2013 and 2014 that together comprise the Fifth Assessment Report: The Physical Science Basis. Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Mitigation of Climate Change. The briefing also describes a range of reactions to the publication of these reports. Observed change in average surface temperature 1901-2012 Source: IPCC 2013a, Figure SPM 1b CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 3 TERMINOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................................................ 5 IPCC ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 ASSESSMENT REPORTS ...................................................................................................................................... 5 CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS (WORKING GROUP I)............................................. 7 CHANGES IN THE CLIMATE SYSTEM - OBSERVATIONS................................................................................... 7 UNDERSTANDING THE CLIMATE SYSTEM ......................................................................................................... 9 CUASES OF CLIMATE CHANGE ............................................................................................................................ 9 FUTURE GLOBAL AND REGIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE ...................................................................................... 9 LIMITING GLOBAL TEMPERATURE RISE ........................................................................................................... 13 CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION AND VULNERABILITY (WORKING GROUP II) ................ 15 IMPACTS ................................................................................................................................................................ 15 ADAPTATION APPROACHES .............................................................................................................................. 16 RISKS, OPPORTUNITIES AND ADAPTATION POTENTIAL ............................................................................... 18 ADAPTATION PRINCIPLES AND PATHWAYS .................................................................................................... 18 CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE (WORKING GROUP III) ................................... 21 EMISSIONS TRENDS ............................................................................................................................................ 21 EMISSION REDUCTION PATHWAYS .................................................................................................................. 22 MITIGATION COSTS ............................................................................................................................................. 23 SECTORS .............................................................................................................................................................. 24 NATIONAL MITIGATION STRATEGIES AND POLICIES ..................................................................................... 26 RESPONSES TO THE PUBLICATION OF AR5 .................................................................................................... 26 UNFCCC PROCESS – NEXT STEPS ....................................................................................................................... 28 SOURCES .................................................................................................................................................................. 29 RELATED BRIEFINGS .............................................................................................................................................. 30 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Under the auspices of the United Nations, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) prepare comprehensive reports about climate change at regular intervals based on the most recent scientific, technical and socio-economic information. The Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) sets out the current state of scientific knowledge and comprises three Working Group reports that cover: the science of climate change; impacts, adaptation and vulnerability to climate change; and the mitigation of climate change. Working Group I (WG1) (on the science) reports that observations of climate change include an average increase in land and ocean temperature of 0.85oC between 1880 and 2012, reductions in annual mean Arctic sea ice equivalent to 3.5 - 4.1% per decade between 1979 and 2012 and a rise in global mean sea level of 0.19m between 1901 and 2010. The report also states that “It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century” and that “substantial and sustained” cuts in greenhouse gas emissions would be required to curb climate change. The report sets out four emission scenarios. In three of these temperatures are likely to exceed 1.5oC by 2100 (compared to 1850-1900), and in two scenarios they are likely to exceed 2oC. The report of Working Group II (WGII) (on impacts and adaptation) highlights impacts that include changes in the quantity and quality of water resources, changes in the geographic range and abundance of many species, and an overall reduction in crop yields. It also notes that marginalised people are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. The report finds that experience is growing in the public and private sector and within communities, and governments are beginning to prepare adaptation plans and policies. The report notes that greater warming will increase the likelihood of “severe, pervasive, and irreversible impacts”. Working Group III (WGIII) considers the mitigation of climate change. The report identifies the four largest sources of emissions in 2010 as i) electricity and heat production, ii) agriculture, forestry and land use, iii) industry and iv) transport. Between 2000 and 2010 emissions of greenhouse gas emissions have increased by an average of 2.2% per year. The report cites economic growth and population growth as the two most significant drivers of increasing CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion. According to the WGIII report scenarios consistent with achieving carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere that are “likely”’ to limit warming to less than 2o degrees above pre-industrial levels are characterised by reductions in global GHG emissions of 40 to 70% in 2050 compared to 2010, rapid increases in energy efficiency and more than tripling the share of zero- and low- carbon energy supply by 2050. The WGIII report highlights that despite a significant increase in plans and strategies aimed at curbing climate emissions there has “not yet been a substantial deviation in global emissions from the past trend.” The authors also suggest that delays to mitigation efforts will make the transition to low emission levels over the longer-term more challenging and constrain the options available to ensure that temperature rise is limited to below 2 oC. 3 TERMINOLOGY AR4: The Fourth Annual Report of the IPCC published in 2007. AR5: The Fifth Annual Report of the IPCC. Working Group Reports on The Physical Science Basis (Working Group I), Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (Working Group II) and Mitigation of Climate Change (Working Group III) have been published in September 2013, March 2014 and April 2014 respectively. A synthesis report is due to be published in November 2014. Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation: A significant current in the Atlantic Ocean that brings warm, salty water northwards in the upper layers of the ocean and takes colder water southwards in the lower levels. This system circulates heat from the Tropics and Southern Hemisphere towards the North Atlantic where it is transferred to the atmosphere. Cancún pledges: At the December 2010 United Nations (UN) Climate Conference in Cancún, Mexico, developed and developing countries put forward pledges to reduce national emissions. Cap and trade: A market-based approach to control pollution. A central authority (usually governmental) sets a limit or ceiling on the volume of emissions that can be released. This limit or cap is allocated or sold to companies as emission permits. These can be bought and sold between companies. CO2eq: A measure used to compare the emissions from different greenhouse gases based on their global warming potential. The carbon dioxide equivalent for a gas is derived by multiplying the tons of the gas by its global warming potential. Conference of the Parties (COP): Countries who sign up to the UNFCCC are known as ‘Parties’. These parties meet annually to assess progress in dealing with climate change. Cumulative emissions: The total amount of emissions released over a given time (usually expressed in tonnes). Ultimately this is the primary determinant of any increase in global temperature. PPM: Parts per million. This is a measure of the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. In 2014, for the first time in human history, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere reached 400 ppm – an increase from a pre-industrial average of around 280 ppm. Radiative Forcing: The difference in sunlight energy received by the Earth and radiated back to space. Where more energy is received than is reflected the system warms up. A range of human activities and natural factors contribute to radiative forcing including greenhouse gases, water vapour, land surface albedo and solar irradiance. Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP): Four greenhouse gas concentration scenarios used in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. The four pathways describe different possible climate futures depending on the volume of greenhouse gases emitted in future years. Solar Irradiance: The power of solar energy reaching the top of Earth’s atmosphere. Solar Variability: Changes in the amount of radiation from the sun. The sun has an 11-year cycle, energy released by the sun during this cycle changes by about a tenth of a percent. 4 BACKGROUND IPCC The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in 1998 to provide a clear scientific view on the current state of knowledge in climate change and its potential environmental and socio-economic impacts. The establishment of the IPCC was endorsed by the UN General Assembly. The IPCC is open to all member countries of the United Nations (UN) and WMO. Currently 195 countries are members of the IPCC. Governments participate in the review process and the plenary sessions, where main decisions about the IPCC work programme are taken and reports are accepted, adopted and approved. The focus of the IPCC is to prepare comprehensive assessment reports about climate change at regular intervals. The IPCC reviews and assesses the most recent scientific, technical and socio-economic information produced worldwide relevant to the understanding of climate change. ASSESSMENT REPORTS The IPCC’s First Assessment Report (FAR) was published in 1990. This report contributed to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which was opened for signature at the Rio de Janeiro Summit in 19921. In 1995 the IPCC published the Second Assessment Report (SAR). This document fed into negotiations of the Kyoto Protocol in 19972. The Third Assessment Report (TAR) was published in 2001 and provided improved understanding about climate change processes, impacts and mitigation options. In 2007 the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) provided further information on the integration of climate change with sustainable development and links between mitigation and adaptation. AR4 fed in to the Thirteenth Conference of the Parties (COP-13) where the Bali Action Plan (BAP) was adopted3. The Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) sets out the current state of scientific knowledge relevant to climate change. AR5 will comprise three Working Group reports and a Synthesis Report (SYR) as follows: Working Group I. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (published September 2013) (IPCC 2013a) Working Group II. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (published March 2014) (IPCC 2014a) 1 The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is an international treaty established in 1992 to enable countries to consider what they could do to limit increases in average global temperature and cope with those impacts of climate change that were, by then, already inevitable. 2 The Kyoto Protocol legally binds developed countries to emission reduction targets and resulted from negotiations to strengthen the global response to climate change. 3 The Bali Action Plan set out the path for a new negotiating process designed to tackle climate change up to and beyond 2012 and involved sections on a shared vision, mitigation, adaptation, technology and financing. 5 Working Group III. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (published April 2014) (IPCC 2014b) Synthesis Report. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (publication due November 2014). Each Working Group report also includes a Summary for Policymakers. AR5 uses the following terminology to describe the likelihood of the outcome: Term Virtually certain Likelihood of outcome 99–100% probability Extremely likely 95-100% probability Very likely 90–100% probability Likely 66–100% probability About as likely as not 33–66% probability Unlikely 0–33% probability Very unlikely 0–10% probability Extremely unlikely 0-5% probability Exceptionally unlikely 0–1% probability The report also ascribes a level of certainty to some of the findings, based on evaluations by the author teams relating to the type, amount, quality, and consistency of evidence and degree of agreement in the scientific studies considered. Confidence is expressed qualitatively using the following qualifiers: very low low medium high, and very high. 6 CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS (WORKING GROUP I) The Working Group I (IPCC 2013a) contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report provides a comprehensive assessment of the physical science basis of climate change. The report includes a number of new aspects including: a new set of climate change scenarios chapters on sea level change, carbon cycle and details relating to monsoons and El Niño increased regional detail on impacts, adaptation and mitigation interactions. CHANGES IN THE CLIMATE SYSTEM - OBSERVATIONS The IPCC Summary for Policy Makers (IPCC 2013b) states that: “Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, sea level has risen, and the concentrations of greenhouse gases have increased.” Table 1 summarises some of the observed changes in the climate system presented in the IPCC AR5 Summary for Policy Makers. Table 1 - A summary of observed changes in the climate system Variable Atmosphere Ocean Ice and snowcover Description The globally averaged combined land and ocean surface temperature has increased by 0.85°C, over the period 1880– 2012. Significant variation exists between years and between decades within the long term warming trend. The upper ocean (0-700 m) has warmed from 1971 to 2010 (‘virtually certain’) and warmed between the 1870s and 1971 (‘likely’). Globally ocean warming nearer the surface (upper 75m) increased by 0.11°C per decade over the period 1971–2010. Reductions in the annual mean Arctic sea ice over the period are equivalent to 3.5 to 4.1% per decade between 1979 and 2012 (‘very likely’) (See Figure 1 below). Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent decreased 1.6% per decade for March and April, and 11.7% per decade for June, over the 1967–2012 period. 7 Extreme weather Sea level CO2 concentration Ocean acidification An increase in the frequency of heat waves in large parts of Europe, Asia and Australia since 1950 (‘likely’). An increase in the frequency or intensity of heavy precipitation events in North America and Europe since 1950 (‘likely’). Global mean sea level rose by 0.19 m between 1901–2010. The mean rate of global average sea level rise was 1.7 mm per year between 1901 and 2010, 2.0 mm per year between 1971 and 2010 and 3.2 mm per year between 1993 and 2010 (‘very likely’). Concentrations of CO2 substantially exceed the highest concentrations recorded in ice cores during the past 800,000 years. CO2 concentrations have increased by 40% since preindustrial times, primarily from fossil fuel emissions and secondarily from net land use change emissions. The pH of ocean surface water has decreased by 0.1 since the beginning of the industrial era (‘high confidence’). Observed changes over time in snow cover, the extent of Arctic summer sea ice, upper ocean heat content and sea level change are also shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 - Observed indicators of a changing global climate (Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover, Arctic summer sea ice extent, change in global average upper ocean heat content, global average sea level change). Source: IPCC 2013a Figure SPM.3 8 UNDERSTANDING THE CLIMATE SYSTEM The report summarises observed changes in our climate system as follows: “Human influence on the climate system is clear. This is evident from the increasing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, positive radiative forcing, observed warming, and understanding of the climate system.” The report notes that climate models have improved since the previous IPCC analysis (IPCC, 2007), with models reproducing observed continental-scale surface temperature patterns and trends over many decades, including the more rapid warming since the mid-20th century and the cooling immediately following large volcanic eruptions (‘very high confidence’). The long-term climate model simulations show a trend in global-mean surface temperature from 1951 to 2012 that agrees with the observed trend (‘very high confidence’). There are differences between simulated and observed trends over periods as short as 10 to 15 years (e.g., 1998 to 2012). The observed reduction in surface warming trend over the period 1998–2012 as compared to the period 1951–2012, is due in roughly equal measure to a reduced trend in radiative forcing and a cooling contribution from internal variability, which includes a possible redistribution of heat within the ocean (‘medium confidence’). The reduced trend in radiative forcing (see glossary) is primarily due to volcanic eruptions and the timing of the downward phase of the 11-year solar cycle. CAUSES OF CLIMATE CHANGE The report considers the factors that are causing climate change and suggests that “It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.” The report states that: Changes in total solar irradiance have not contributed to the increase in global mean surface temperature over the period 1986 to 2008 (‘high confidence’). The 11-year cycle of solar variability influences decadal climate fluctuations in some regions (‘medium confidence’). FUTURE GLOBAL AND REGIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE According to the report “Continued emissions of greenhouse gases will cause further warming and changes in all components of the climate system.” Four scenarios are identified in the AR5 report (Table 2). The scenarios are called Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) and relate to the approximate total radiative forcing in year 2100 relative to 1750. This is the difference between the amount of energy received by the Earth from the sun and radiated back to space. 9 Table 2 - A summary of the emission concentrations associated with the four scenarios identified in the AR5 report Scenario Description RCP2.6 Radiative forcing peaks and declines by 2100 Radiative forcing stabilises by 2100 RCP4.5 RCP6 RCP8.5 Radiative forcing increases beyond 2100 Radiative forcing increases beyond 2100. CO2 equivalent concentrations (ppm by 2100)4 475 630 800 1313 On the basis of these four scenarios projections of mean surface temperature changes and mean sea level rise are similar to those set out in AR4. Depending on scenario the mean surface temperature change range from 1.0 to 2.0 oC over the period 2046-2065 and 1.0 to 3.7 o C over the period 2081-2100. The average sea level rise ranges from 0.24 to 0.3 m and 0.4 to 0.63 m over the 2046-2065 and 2081-2100 periods respectively. Table 3 - Mean global surface temperature change and sea level rise associated with the four scenarios included within AR5. 2046-2065 2081–2100 Mean Mean Global Mean Surface Temperature Change (°C) 1.0 – 2.0 1.0 – 3.7 Global Mean Sea Level Rise (m) 0.24 – 0.3 0.40 – 0.63 Table 4 and Figure 3 summarise the projected impact of the four IPCC global emission scenarios on the climate, including an assessment of the likelihood associated with many of these changes. 4 Prescribed CO2 equivalent concentrations used in most of the simulations 10 Table 4 - The projected impact of the four IPCC global emission scenarios (RCPs) on a number of climate variables including temperature, extreme weather, ice, sea level and acidification. Variable Temperature Extreme weather Description In all but one of the emission scenarios mean global surface temperatures are ‘likely’ to exceed 1.5°C relative to 1850 to 1900 by 2100. In two scenarios (RCP6.0 and RCP8.5) it is ‘likely’ to exceed 2°C and for RCP 4.5 ‘more likely than not’ to exceed 2°C (Table 3). Warming is ‘unlikely’ to exceed 4°C for RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP6.0 (‘high confidence’) and is ‘about as likely as not’ to exceed 4°C for RCP8.5 (‘medium confidence’). Estimates of ocean warming in the top one hundred metres range from 0.6°C (RCP2.6) to 2.0°C (RCP8.5) by 2100. The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) will weaken over the 21st century (very likely) however it is ‘very unlikely’ that the AMOC will undergo an abrupt transition or collapse in the 21st century for the scenarios considered. More frequent hot and fewer cold temperature extremes over most land areas on daily and seasonal timescales are ‘virtually certain’. As global mean temperatures increase it is ‘very likely’ that the frequency and duration of heat waves will increase. Extreme precipitation events over most of the mid-latitude land masses and over wet tropical regions will ‘very likely’ become more intense and more frequent by the end of this century, as global mean surface temperature increases. Globally, it is ‘likely’ that; the area encompassed by monsoon systems will increase over the 21st century; monsoon winds will weaken and monsoon precipitation intensify. 11 Ice Sea Level Acidification Predicted reductions in Arctic sea ice by the end of the 21st century range from 43% to 94% in September and from 8% to 34% for in February depending on scenario (medium confidence). By the end of the 21st century, the global glacier volume, excluding glaciers on the periphery of Antarctica, is projected to decrease by 15 to 55% (RCP2.6), and 35 to 85% for RCP8.5 (medium confidence). The area of Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover is projected to decrease by 7% for RCP2.6 and by 25% in RCP8.5 by the end of the 21st century for the model average (medium confidence). Global mean sea level rise for 2081−2100 relative to 1986– 2005 will likely be in the ranges of 0.26 to 0.55 m in the lowest scenario and 0.45 to 0.82 m in the highest scenario (medium confidence). Sea level rise will not be uniform. By the end of the 21st century, it is ‘very likely’ that sea level will rise in more than about 95% of the ocean area. About 70% of the coastlines worldwide are projected to experience sea level change within 20% of the global mean sea level change. Ocean acidification is predicted to increase and (Figure 2). 12 Figure 2 – Modelled global annual mean surface temperature, Northern Hemisphere September sea ice extent, and global mean ocean surface pH for the period 1950 to 2100 Source: IPCC 2013a Figure SPM.7 LIMITING GLOBAL TEMPERATURE RISE The scale of global temperature rise will depend on the total amount of greenhouse gas emissions released into the atmosphere. This concept is sometimes referred to as either the area under the curve or as cumulative emissions. Figure 3 highlights the corresponding temperature increase by 2100 as it relates to four different cumulative emission scenarios (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0 and RCP8.5). 13 Figure 3 - Projections of global mean surface temperature increase in response to cumulative total global CO2 emissions Source: IPCC 2013a SPM.10 The report sets out the total amount of carbon dioxide (in gigatonnes of carbon dioxide GtC) that could be released if climate warming is to be limited to less than 2°C above the 1861–1880 period. The report provides this information on the basis of three different probabilities of achieving this warming limit: 33%, greater than 50% and greater than 66% (Table 5) Table 5 - Cumulative CO2 emissions associated with different probabilities of limiting warming to 2oC. Maximum cumulative CO2 emissions (GtC) 33% Excluding non-CO2 radiative forcing 1560 Including non-CO2 radiative forcing 880 >50% 1210 840 >66% 1000 800 Probability 14 The AR5 report notes that cumulative CO2 emissions lower than those set out in Table 5 would be required to: Achieve a lower warming target. Have a greater likelihood of remaining below a specific warming target Account for the warming effects of increases in non-CO2 greenhouse gases, reductions in aerosols, or the release of greenhouse gases from permafrost. By 2011 541 GtC were emitted. On the basis of the four scenarios used in AR5 the report provides an assessment of the cumulative CO2 emissions available in the period 2012-2100 (Table 6). Table 6 - Cumulative emission totals associated with four different RCP scenarios Scenario Mean Range Cumulative CO2 Emissions 2012–2100 (in GtC) RCP2.6 270 140 to 410 RCP4.5 780 595 to 1005 RCP6.0 1060 840 to 1250 RCP8.5 1685 1415 to 1910 CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION AND VULNERABILITY (WORKING GROUP II) The Working Group II contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report provides a comprehensive assessment of the impacts and risks of climate change and the scope for adapting to it. The report details: Observed impacts of climate change. Approaches that are being adopted to adapt to the impacts of climate change. Risks and opportunities resulting from climate change. IMPACTS The report finds that climate change is already having a range of impacts and sets out that: Changes in precipitation or melting snow and ice are impacting on the quantity and quality of water resources (medium confidence). The geographic range, seasonal activity, migration pattern and abundances of many terrestrial, freshwater and marine species have changed. A greater number of studies report negative impacts of climate change on crop yields rather than positive impacts. In particular reduced wheat and maize yields have been observed in many regions. 15 The burden of ill-health from climate change is relatively small compared with other causes. Mortality relating to heat has increased and relating to cold has decreased. Poor people are especially vulnerable to climate change. The impacts of recent climate-related extremes, for example heat waves, droughts, floods and cyclones highlight that many human systems and some ecosystems are very vulnerable. Hazards posed by climate change can add to other challenges to impact of livelihoods. By damaging assets that can support adaptation, for example infrastructure and natural resources, violent conflict can increase vulnerability to climate change. ADAPTATION APPROACHES WGII reports that progress is being made in incorporating adaptation into planning processes, experience in the public and private sector and within communities is growing and governments are beginning to prepare adaptation plans and policies. Table 5 summarises some approaches to adaptation in different regions of the world as set out in WGII. Table 7 - Examples of climate change adaptation responses in different regions of the world. Region Nature of adaptation responses National governments developing governance systems. Vulnerability being reduced through adjustments in technologies and infrastructure, the implementation of ecosystem approaches, implementation of public health measures. Adaptation policy developed across multiple levels of government. Some adaptation planning reflected in coastal and water management, land planning and disaster risk management. Mainstreaming climate adaptation into subnational development planning. In some areas. Actions include warning systems, water resource management approaches and coastal reforestation of mangroves. Australasia Planning associated with sea-level rise and reduced water availability becoming adopted. North America Incremental adaptation planning at government level. Proactive adaptation in areas like energy and public infrastructure. Central & South America Ecosystem-based adaptation approaches including protected areas and community management of natural areas. Approaches being adopted in the agricultural sector in some areas include the use of resilient crop varieties and integrated water resource management. Africa Europe Asia 16 Figure 4 - Global impacts attributed to climate change including an indication of the confidence with which the impacts have been attributed to climate change. Source IPCC 2014, Figure SPM.2 17 RISKS, OPPORTUNITIES AND ADAPTATION POTENTIAL The Working Group II report notes that greater warming will increase the likelihood of “severe, pervasive, and irreversible impacts” and that limiting the rate and magnitude of climate change will reduce the impacts. The report also sets out the particular risks that each sector faces and the potential within these sectors for adaptation. Table 8 summarises some of this information. ADAPTATION PRINCIPLES AND PATHWAYS WGII summarises a number of principles for effective adaptation and pathways to increase climate resilience. These principles include: Pursuing approaches that reflect and integrate actions across a range of levels – national, sub-national and local governments, the private sector, communities and individuals. Reducing vulnerability to current climate variability as a way of increasing resilience to future change. Utilising economic instruments (e.g. public private finance partnerships, loans, resource pricing, charges and subsidies) to support adaptation by providing incentives. Drawing on synergies between responses aimed at reducing emissions with those focused on adaptation and managing trade-offs. The report highlights that the scope for pursuing climate-resilient pathways in the future is related to the success of efforts to reduce emissions given that mitigation would reduce the rate and scale of warming and increase the time available for adaptation noting that “Delaying mitigation actions may reduce options for climate-resilient pathways in the future.” 18 Table 8 - A summary of some of the risks and potential adaptation responses by sector. Sector Freshwater: Risks/adaptation potential Greater proportion of global population at threat from water scarcity and major river flooding. Water resources at high latitudes set to increase. Water quality set to reduce and pose a threat to drinking water quality. A “large fraction” of terrestrial and freshwater species face an increased risk of extinction during and beyond 21st century. Under mid- and high-range emission scenarios many species will be unable to track suitable climates. Interventions like maintenance of genetic diversity, assisted species migration and dispersal and reduction of other stressors can reduce risks of impacts and increase capacity of ecosystems to adapt. Coastal systems and lowlying areas Adverse impacts including submergence, coastal flooding and coastal erosion set to result from sealevel rise through the 21st century and beyond. Marine systems Fisheries catch potential projected to increase, on average, at mid and high latitudes (high confidence) and decrease at tropical latitudes (medium confidence). Under medium to high emission scenarios, ocean acidification poses significant risks to marine ecosystems, especially for polar ecosystems and coral reefs. Food security and food production systems Without adaptation major crop production (wheat, rice and maize) in tropical and temperate regions is predicted to reduce. Urban areas People in urban areas are set to be at threat from a range of factors including heat stress, extreme precipitation, flooding, landslides and water scarcity. Improving the provision of basic services, quality of housing and building resilient infrastructure could reduce vulnerability. Terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems 19 Rural areas Economic sectors and services Human health Human security Livelihoods and poverty Major impacts in rural areas associated with water availability and supply, food security and agricultural incomes expected. Poor people in rural areas likely to be particularly impacted. Potential for rural considerations to be reflected in adaptation measures associated with agriculture, water, forestry and biodiversity. Reduced energy demand for heating and increased demand for cooling. Increase in losses associated with more severe/frequent weather events. Significant uncertainty in economic impacts. Increases in ill-health in many regions, especially developing countries with low income to be expected throughout the 21st century (examples include an increase in the likelihood of disease and death associated with more intense heat waves and undernutrition as a result of diminished food production in poor regions). Some reduction in cold related mortality. Overall severity and magnitude of negative impacts expected to outweigh positive impacts over the 21 st century. Vulnerability can be reduced through improvements in public health care, greater disaster response capacity and alleviating poverty. Increase in displacement of people expected over the 21st century. Opportunities to decrease vulnerability include increasing opportunities for mobility. Over the 21st century impacts are projected to “slow down economic growth, make poverty reduction more difficult, further erode food security and prolong existing and create new poverty traps”. The impact of climate change is expected to exacerbate poverty in most developing countries. Possibilities to increase resilience include insurance programs, social protection measures and disaster risk management. 20 CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE (WORKING GROUP III) The Working Group III contribution to the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report provides a comprehensive assessment of the scientific, technological, environmental, economic and social aspects of climate change mitigation. The report includes an assessment of a range of mitigation options and the social impacts of different mitigation policies. EMISSIONS TRENDS Figure 5 shows the source of global greenhouse gas emissions by sector in 2010. The four largest sources of emissions are electricity and heat production, emissions from agriculture, forestry and land use (AFOLU), industry and transport. Emissions from electricity and heat are further broken down to reflect how the electricity and heat are consumed and these are sometimes referred to as “indirect” emissions. Figure 5 - Global greenhouse gas emissions by sector Source: IPCC 2014b, Figure SPM.2 Figure 6 shows changes in greenhouse gas emissions between 1970 and 2010. Between 2000 and 2010 emissions of greenhouse gas emissions have increased by 1.0 Gt CO2 per year, equivalent to 2.2% per year. This compares to an increase of 0.4 Gt CO2 per year between 1970 and 2000 (1.3% per year). Since 2000 GHG emissions have increased in all sectors except for agriculture, forestry and other land use. Emissions of carbon dioxide from the combustion of fossil fuels and industrial processes are responsible for 78% of the total increase in GHG emissions between 1970 and 2010. CO 2 emissions from fossil fuels increased by a further 3% between 2010 and 2011 and 1-2% 21 between 2011 and 2012. In 1970 the cumulative CO2 emissions total from fossil fuel combustion, cement production and flaring since 1750 were estimated at 420 Gt CO2. By 2010 the cumulative total had increased by a factor of three to 1300 Gt CO2. Figure 6 Global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions between 1970 and 2010 Source IPCC 2014b Figure SPM.1 Key: CO2 from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes; CO 2 from Forestry and Other Land Use (FOLU); methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), fluorinated gases covered under the Kyoto Protocol (F-Gases). The right side of the figure indicates associated uncertainties with emissions of each these gases as indicated by error bars. The report cites economic growth and population growth as the two most significant drivers of increasing CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion. This increase outstrips reductions from improvements in energy efficiency and the authors state that: “Without additional efforts to reduce GHG emissions beyond those in place today, emissions growth is expected to persist driven by growth in global population and economic activities.” EMISSION REDUCTION PATHWAYS According to the WGIII report mitigation scenarios that are ‘likely’ to limit warming caused by GHG emissions to less than 2o degrees above pre-industrial levels are ‘characterised’ by atmospheric concentrations of around 450 ppm CO2eq in 2100. Mitigation scenarios in which CO2 concentrations reach 530 to 650 ppm CO2eq by 2100 are ‘more unlikely than likely’ to keep temperature change below 2oC, and those where CO2 concentrations reach 650 ppm CO2eq by 2100 are ‘unlikely’ to limit temperature change to below 2 oC. Scenarios resulting in atmospheric concentrations of CO2 equivalent of 450 ppm by 2100 are 22 characterized by reductions in global GHG emissions of 40 to 70% in 2050 compared to 2010 and near zero or below zero in 2100. Such scenarios are also characterised by rapid increases in energy efficiency, more than tripling the share of zero and low carbon energy supply by 2050. The report notes that those mitigation scenarios associated with achieving 450 ppm CO2 (and many associated with achieving 500 to 550 ppm) in 2100 typically include a period when CO2 concentrations peak above this level and rely on the extensive deployment of technology that would remove emissions from the atmosphere. Such technology includes combining biomass as an energy source with carbon capture and storage and the report does note that the availability and scale of such approaches are uncertain. The WGIII assessment also highlights that estimated global GHG emissions levels in 2020 based on emission cuts pledged at Cancún (the ‘Cancún Pledges’) are “not consistent with costeffective long-term mitigation trajectories that are at least ‘as likely as not’ to limit temperature change to 2oC relative to pre-industrial levels” and are “broadly consistent with cost-effective scenarios that are likely to keep temperature change below 3 oC relative to pre-industrial levels.” The authors suggest that delays to mitigation efforts will make the transition to low emission levels over the longer term more challenging, noting that: “Delaying mitigation efforts beyond those in place today through 2030 is estimated to substantially increase the difficulty of the transition to low longer-term emissions levels and narrow the range of options consistent with maintaining temperature change below 2oC relative to pre-industrial levels (high confidence).” According to the report cost-effective mitigation scenarios that make limiting temperature to less than 2oC and are ‘as least as likely as not’ tend to be characterised by annual GHG emissions in 2030 of 30 to 50 GtCO2eq. MITIGATION COSTS The Working Group III report highlights that significant variations exist in the estimates of aggregate economic costs of mitigation with estimates very sensitive to assumptions, model design and the details included within scenarios. However, on the basis of a number of assumptions, scenarios that result in atmospheric CO2eq concentrations of around 450 ppm by 2100 result in reductions in the global consumption of goods and services of between 3% and 11% in 2100 (compared to baseline scenarios of growth of between 300% and 900%). The assessment concludes that this equates to an annual reduction in growth of between 0.04% and 0.14%. 23 SECTORS Table 9 summarises the scale and scope for emissions reduction in some significant sectors. Sector Energy supply Transport Emission reduction potential – scale and scope Decarbonisation of electricity generation is a “key component” of costeffective mitigation strategies that achieve low CO2 stabilization levels (430-530 ppm CO2eq). Under these strategies the share of low-carbon electricity supply increases from approximately 30% to over 80% by 2050 and fossil fuel power generation without CCS is phased out almost entirely by 2100 in most scenarios. Significant improvements in performance and cost reductions in many renewable technologies achieved since the publication of AR4 has supported deployment at scale. Many renewable technologies continue to require support to boost their market share. Scope to reduce GHG emissions from energy supply by replacing coalfired power plants with very efficient gas combined-cycle power plants or combined heat and power (subject to availability of natural gas and ensuring that emissions associated with extraction and supply are low or mitigated. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology could play a role in reducing GHG emissions of fossil fuel plants, however regulatory incentives and or high carbon prices or direct financial support likely required. Many low CO2 concentration stabilisation scenarios involve bioenergy combined with CCS (BECCS). Efficiency and vehicle performance improvements range from 30-50% in 2030 relative to 2010. Modal shifts have the potential to reduce transport GHG emissions by 20-50% in 2050 compared to baseline. The challenges associated with energy storage and the low energy density of low-carbon transport fuels constrain the options and speed for decarbonising the transport sector. 24 Buildings Industry Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use Human Settlements, Infrastructure and Spatial Planning Improvements in technologies, knowledge and policies provide opportunities to stabilise or reduce energy use in the building sector by 2050. The adoption of very low energy building codes important for new buildings and retrofit programmes for countries with established stock have a strong role to play. Lifestyle and behavioural changes for developed countries could reduce energy demand by up to 50% of present levels by mid-century. Reducing emissions from buildings provide significant additional benefits for example energy security, tackling fuel poverty and providing employment opportunities. The use of best available technologies has the potential to improve the energy efficiency of the industry sector by around 25% compared to the current level. Further emission reductions could be achieved through more efficient material use, recycling and re-use of materials and reductions in demand. Afforestation, reducing deforestation and sustainable forestry management provide cost effective mitigation options for forestry. Cost-effective mitigation options for agriculture include cropland and grazing land management and restoration of organic soils. Bioenergy can play an important role in reducing emissions. However issues including the sustainability of practices and efficiency of systems need to be considered and barriers to the deployment at scale include concerns about GHG emissions from land and biodiversity conservation. Cities in Annex I countries tend to have lower levels of energy use per capita compared to the national average, and those cities in Annex II tend to have higher levels.5 Opportunities exist to address emissions from urban areas in the coming decades as a result of the development of many of these areas during this time. Successful approaches to mitigation require the integration of policies, for example to co-locate high residential and high employment density areas, invest in public transport and demand management measures. 5 Annex 1 countries include those industrialised countries that were members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 1992, plus countries with economies in transition, including the Russian Federation, the Baltic States, and several Central and Eastern European States. Annex II countries comprise those countries that were members of the OECD but exclude economies in transition. They are required to provide financial support to enable developing countries to reduce their emissions and adapt to climate change. 25 NATIONAL MITIGATION STRATEGIES AND POLICIES The WGIII report highlights that despite a significant increase in national and sub-national plans and strategies aimed at curbing climate emission there has “not yet been a substantial deviation in global emissions from the past trend.” The report also suggests that policies that are sector specific are more widespread than those that are economy-wide. The authors suggest that: “..most economic theory suggests that economy-wide policies for the singular objective of mitigation would be more cost-effective than sector-specific policies, since AR4 a growing number of studies has demonstrated that administrative and political barriers may make economy-wide policies harder to design and implement than sector-specific policies.” The report also considers the impact of cap and trade systems for greenhouse gas emissions. A cap and trade approach works by setting a limit is set on the amount of greenhouse gases that can be emitted by specific sectors (e.g. power stations). Within the limit companies can receive or buy emission allowances and trade them as needed. The report suggests that the impact of such systems has been limited because the caps have been set at relatively high levels. The authors note that in some countries, tax-based policies designed to curb greenhouse gas emissions have helped reduce the amount of emissions released per unit of economic activity. They also refer to projections that reductions in global emissions by midcentury could be achieved through the removal of fossil fuel subsidies in all countries. RESPONSES TO THE PUBLICATION OF AR5 Some individuals and organisations including the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) have challenged the findings and conclusions of the IPCC AR5 report, however their views are not shared by the majority of climate scientists. A wide range of politicians, scientists and environmental bodies responded to the publication of the AR5 Working Group reports. Commenting on the release of the WGI report on the physical science of climate change EU Commissioner for Climate Action Connie Hedegaard noted the need to follow the science and Europe’s role in cutting emissions (European Commission 2013): “The issue is not whether to believe in climate change or not. The issue is whether to follow science or not. The day when all scientists with 100% certainty warn you against climate change, it will be too late. If your doctor was 95% sure you had a serious disease, you would immediately start looking for the cure. Why should we take bigger risks when it's the health of our planet at stake? Europe will continue to lead the fight against climate change. We have ambitious legislation in place. We are reducing our emissions considerably, expanding renewables and saving energy. And we are getting ready for the next step: climate and energy targets for 2030 that the Commission will present before the end of the year. The reality is that others are now following suit. Europe will continue to demand more action from all the emitters.'' The UK Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, Edward Davey set out the need to take action (DECC 2013): “The message of this report is clear - the Earth’s climate has warmed over the last century and man-made greenhouse gases have caused much of that global warming. 26 The gases emitted now are accumulating in the atmosphere and so the solutions must be set in motion today. The risks and costs of doing nothing today are so great, only a deeply irresponsible government would be so negligent.” Paul Wheelhouse, Scottish Government Minister for Environment and Climate Change set out the need for a global deal on climate change (Scottish Parliament 2013): “The IPCC report sends a stronger than ever warning that human activity is changing the global climate and that reducing global greenhouse gas emissions is the only way of limiting the extent of future climate change. It also shows that without global action, surface temperature could increase by up to 4.5°C and the sea level by up to 0.82m by the end of the century… given the IPCC’s warning, Scotland’s actions alone are not enough and we need the rest of the United Kingdom, our European neighbours and indeed all countries to share our ambition. We want an ambitious global deal on climate change to be agreed in 2015 and have been calling for the European Union to raise its pre-2020 emissions target.” Professor David MacKay FRS, Chief Scientific Advisor to the Department of Energy and Climate Change highlighted the risks of delaying action (DECC 2013): “One important message of this new report is that, while there remains some uncertainty about the precise sensitivity of the climate to greenhouse gas emissions, the impact on climate is largely determined by the cumulative total of humanity’s carbon emissions. This means that waiting a decade or two before taking climate change action will certainly lead to greater harm than acting now.” James Curran, Chief Executive of the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) noted the risks and dangers of positive feedback (SEPA 2013): “…this report crucially states that there is now high confidence that feedback between climate and the Earth’s own carbon cycle is positive. That is so very dangerous: it means as climate change progresses, polar ice disappears, which means sunshine can heat the revealed land and oceans more effectively; and as permafrost melts, the soggy soils can release methane into the atmosphere; as oceans become acidic, plankton don’t soak up carbon as much; as forests or peatlands die back, they don’t absorb carbon, but in fact release it. That’s the danger zone we must keep away from, and nations around the world have agreed we step into that danger zone when planetary temperature has risen by about 2oC.” The UK Committee on Climate Change (UKCCC) set out the scale of the change required to our energy systems if the two-degree target is to be hit, UKCCC member Professor Jim Skea (UKCCC 2013) said: “Hitting the two-degree target has not been ruled out, but the IPCC has concluded in its report that major changes would be needed to energy systems, requiring technological and institutional change on a massive scale. “This could imply a tripling or quadrupling, by 2050, of cleaner electricity sources such as renewables, nuclear or fossil fuels, along with carbon capture and storage, and the aggressive pursuit of energy efficiency opportunities.” Global responses include the United States. Commenting on the release of the Working Group 27 II Report Secretary John Kerry (US Embassy 2014) said: “Read this report and you can't deny the reality: Unless we act dramatically and quickly, science tells us our climate and our way of life are literally in jeopardy. Denial of the science is malpractice. There are those who say we can’t afford to act. But waiting is truly unaffordable. The costs of inaction are catastrophic.” In October 2013 the House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee launched an inquiry6 into the Fifth Assessment Report. The inquiry considered the latest conclusions of the IPCC, how robust the conclusions are and their impact on national and international policy making. In July 2014 the Committee published their report (House of Commons 2014). Amongst their conclusions the Energy and Climate Change Committee concluded that: “the WGI contribution to AR5 is the best available summary of the prevailing scientific opinion on climate change currently available to policy-makers. Its conclusions are derived with a high confidence from areas of well understood science. Uncertainty remains in a small number of important areas but these are diminishing….The overall thrust and conclusions of the report are widely supported in the scientific community and summaries are presented in a way that is persuasive to the lay reader.” UNFCCC PROCESS – NEXT STEPS At the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Durban in 2011 (Conference of the Parties 17) those countries signed up to the UNFCCC agreed to develop a new legal agreement to be adopted in Paris in late 2015 to cover all countries from 2020 and scale up efforts before 2020 to curb emissions. In parallel those signatories to the UNFCCC agreed to review the adequacy of the 2°C upper limit of acceptable warming and progress towards limiting warming in line with this. The Director for Implementation Strategy of the UN Climate Change Secretariat has already noted (UNFCCC 2013) that “We know that the sum total of on-going efforts to limit warming will not add up to what is needed to bend the curve and mankind is not on track to limit warming to 2°C.” AR5 provides an important resource that is likely to be drawn on in informing and developing the next steps of the UNFCCC process including the development of a new agreement on climate action over the coming year for consideration at a Conference of the Parties meeting in 2015 in Paris. 6 http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/energy-and-climate-changecommittee/inquiries/parliament-2010/the-ipcc/ 28 SOURCES DECC. 2013. Media release: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/response-tointergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change-ipcc-fifth-assessment-report-ar5-the-latestassessment-of-climate-science [Accessed 15th May 2014] European Commission. 2013 Media release: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13827_en.htm [Accessed 15th May 2014] House of Commons. 2014 Energy and Climate Change - First Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report: Review of Working Group I contribution [Accessed 23rd September 2014]. IPCC. 2007 Climate Change 2007 The AR4 Synthesis Report. Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml [Accessed 8th May 2014]. IPCC. 2013a Climate Change 2013 The Physical Science Basis. IPCC Working Group I contribution to AR5. http://www.climatechange2013.org/ [Accessed 8th May 2014] IPCC. 2013b Climate Change 2013 The Physical Science Basis. IPCC Working Group I contribution to AR5. Summary for Policymakers. Available at: http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf [Accessed 8th May 2014]. IPCC 2014a Climate Change 2014. Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. IPCC Working Group II contribution to AR5. Available at: http://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/ [Accessed 8th May 2014] IPCC 2014b Climate Change 2014. Mitigation of Climate Change. IPCC Working Group III contribution to AR5. Available at: http://www.mitigation2014.org/ [Accessed 8th May 2014] SEPA. 2013. SEPA View IPCC Latest Climate Report: our CEO’s views. Available at http://www.sepaview.com/2013/09/ipcc-latest-climate-report-our-ceos-views [Accessed 15th May 2014] Scottish Parliament. 2013. Official Report 1st October 2012. Available at http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/parliamentarybusiness/28862.aspx?r=8893 [Accessed 15th May 2014]. UKCCC. 2014 Renewable solution needed: our response to the third IPCC report. Available at: http://www.theccc.org.uk/blog/renewable-solution-needed-our-response-to-the-third-ipcc-report/ [Accessed 15th May 2014]. UNFCCC. 2013. Opening Statement 12th Session of IPCC Working Group 1. Available at http://unfccc.int/files/press/statements/application/pdf/20132309_ht_ipcc.pdf [Accessed 15th May 2014]. US Embassy. 2014. Statement by Secretary Kerry – Release of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group 2 Report. Available at: http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/texttrans/2014/03/20140331297180.html#axzz3En8Ay OAQ [Accessed 30th September 2014] 29 RELATED BRIEFINGS SB 13-07 RPP2 and Scotland’s Climate Change Targets SB 12-47 Climate Change – The Role of the Individual SB 12-28 Peatlands and Climate Change SB 12-26 Climate Change and Health in Scotland SB 11-39 Energy: Subject Profile Briefing SB 10-87 Cancún: UN Climate Negotiations SB 09-28 Climate Change: The Threat to Species Briefing Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe) Briefings are compiled for the benefit of the Members of the Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with MSPs and their staff who should contact Dan Barlow on extension 85416 or email [email protected]. Members of the public or external organisations may comment on this briefing by emailing us at [email protected]. However, researchers are unable to enter into personal discussion in relation to SPICe Briefing Papers. If you have any general questions about the work of the Parliament you can email the Parliament’s Public Information Service at [email protected]. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained in SPICe briefings is correct at the time of publication. Readers should be aware however that briefings are not necessarily updated or otherwise amended to reflect subsequent changes. www.scottish.parliament.uk 30