* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Site-specific recombination mechanisms exploit DNA
List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Silencer (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Holliday junction wikipedia , lookup
DNA sequencing wikipedia , lookup
DNA barcoding wikipedia , lookup
Comparative genomic hybridization wikipedia , lookup
Agarose gel electrophoresis wikipedia , lookup
Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup
Maurice Wilkins wikipedia , lookup
Bisulfite sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Molecular evolution wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Gel electrophoresis of nucleic acids wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Transformation (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup
Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry: Site-specific recombination mechanisms exploit DNA topology Through a series of elegant genetic experiments in the early eighties Piet van de Putte (Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Leiden University) determined that bacteriophage (Mu) changes its host range through expression of different tail fibers by changing the orientation of a specific DNA segment, the G segment, in its genome1. The phage-encoded Gin recombinase protein specifically recombined the G segment located between short inverted DNA sequences, but not between the same sequences in direct repeat orientation. Since there were analogous sitespecific DNA recombination systems in transposons, that had the opposite selectivity for DNA deletion, rather than inversion, the most competitive issue driving the field was to figure out how this selectivity was achieved. The puzzle was solved by ingenious experiments performed by Piet’s graduate student Roland Kanaar in the late eighties in collaboration with Nick Cozzarelli, a professor at UC Berkeley and an expert in DNA supercoiling. Roland combined biochemical and electron microscopy experiments with a branch of mathematics known as topology to devise how the Gin protein, together with a host-encoded protein and an enhancer site on the DNA exploited supercoiling to achieve selectivity for DNA inversion, rather than deletion2,3. At the Nucleic Acids study group meetings in Lunteren Roland was well known for dazzling his audience with a flexible ribbon model of DNA, which he was twirling around as a magician while recombining the ribbons. Those who grasped topology could answer his question as to which knotted or catenated product should come out of the operation he just performed. The work still has general implications as it elucidated the mechanism of how nucleoprotein complexes assembled at distant sites along a DNA chain communicate with each other to provide selectivity during DNA transactions. 1 2 3 Van de Putte et al., 1980, Nature 286, 218-222; PMID: 6250048 Kanaar et al., 1989, Cell 58, 147-159; PMID: 2546671 Kanaar et al., Cell 1990 62, 353-366; PMID: 2164890 The provided images show the Gin protein on supercoiled DNA bridging three distant sites (top) and knotted DNA products of a reaction essential to solve the mechanism using topology. Source: Claire Wyman (EUMC)