Download A Glucose-inducible Gene in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, rrg1 , Is

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Endomembrane system wikipedia , lookup

Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup

Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup

Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup

Biochemical switches in the cell cycle wikipedia , lookup

Programmed cell death wikipedia , lookup

Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup

SULF1 wikipedia , lookup

Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup

Cell culture wikipedia , lookup

Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup

Cell cycle wikipedia , lookup

Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup

Cell growth wikipedia , lookup

Mitosis wikipedia , lookup

Amitosis wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Mol. Cells, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 312-317
M olecules
and
Cells
Communication
KSMCB 2002
A Glucose-inducible Gene in Schizosaccharomyces pombe,
rrg1+, Is Involved in Negative Regulation of G2/M Progression
Min Ji Kim, Eun Jung Park1, and Sang Dai Park*
School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea;
1
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon 442-749, Korea.
(Received June 10, 2002; Accepted July 20, 2002)
A glucose-inducible gene in S. pombe is rrg1+. Its
mRNA level is rapidly decreased and increased by glucose-depletion and readdition, respectively. The
previous study revealed that the rrg1+ expression was
regulated by glucose-dependent mRNA stability control. To understand the significance of the glucosedependent expression of rrg1+, the cellular function of
rrg1+ was explored. Deletion of the rrg1+ gene from the
haploid chromosome of S. pombe cells did not lead to
cell lethality but brought about cell size reduction,
which was accompanied by fast cell proliferation. In
accordance with this result, the overexpression of the
Rrg1 protein under the control of the nmt1 promoter
produced elongated cells of G2 delay, and consequently
resulted in the slowing-down of cell proliferation. In
addition, the rrg1+ mRNA level showed cell-cycle dependent changes, peaking at G2/M. These results demonstrate that Rrg1 might be involved in the negative
regulation of cell proliferation and G2/M progression
for cell size control.
Keywords: Cell Proliferation; Cell Size Control; G2/M
Progression; Glucose; rrg1+; Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Introduction
Glucose-dependent gene expression is one of the most
fundamental cellular responses for optimal cell growth,
and it occurs on a genome-wide scale. In Saccharomyces
cerevisiae, a recent analysis revealed that transcript levels
of numerous genes are differentially regulated in response
Demo
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Tel: 82-2-880-6689; Fax: 82-2-887-6279
E-mail: [email protected]
to varying glucose levels (DeRisi et al., 1997). During the
shift from fermentation to respiration upon glucose
exhaustion, the cells are subjected to widespread changes
in the gene expressions that are involved in fundamental
cellular processes, such as protein synthesis and carbohydrate storage as well as carbon metabolism. Among these,
the expression of the genes that encodes the low-affinity
glucose transporter, glycolytic enzymes, ribosomal proteins, tRNA synthetase, and translation elongation and
initiation factors is induced by glucose. A large number of
other genes that are involved in the utilization of alternative carbon sources, gluconeogenesis, respiration, and
peroxisomal functions are repressed by glucose (DeRisi et
al., 1997). Although the genes, whose expression is glucose-inducible, are more abundant than the glucoserepressible genes, more attention has been given to the
latter in yeast studies (DeRisi et al., 1997). As glucoseinducible expressions in S. cerevisiae, the transcriptional
controls of hexose transporters (HXT) and ribosomal proteins (RP) by glucose have been extensively studied
(Ozcan and Johnston, 1999). However, identities of the
glucose-regulated genes and molecular mechanisms that
underlie the glucose-dependent expressions in the fission
yeast S. pombe remain mostly elusive.
In nearly all cells, there are two fundamental processes
during the cell cycle: one is growth and the other is the
splitting event of cell division. These processes must interact in balanced growth, otherwise cell size at division
would drift and ultimately lead to cell death. The homeostatic mechanism that maintains cell size is the ‘size control’, which ensures that the processes that lead to division only start when the cell has reached a critical size.
Evidence for size control comes from a wide variety of
cells. These include Escherichia coli (Donachie, 1968),
mammalian fibroblasts (Killander and Zetterberg, 1965;
Zetterberg and Killander, 1965), and budding yeast
(Murray and Hunt, 1993). However, the most extensive
studies on size control have been made with the fission
Min Ji Kim et al.
yeast S. pombe. In this organism, the individual cell size
can be easily determined because they are cylindrical and
growth occurs by length extension (Murray and Hunt,
1993). The size control in S. pombe works by altering the
time to mitosis (and division), rather than the rate of
growth. (Fantes, 1977). For a population of cells to be
able to maintain an average cell size, the cells that are
born with a smaller-than-average length must spend more
time growing before initiating mitosis and dividing than
do the cells that are born with an average cell length. The
reverse is true for cells that are born with a larger-thanaverage cell length. The sizing mechanism that links
growth to division, or the G2/M cell size checkpoint, has
been studied extensively through the analysis of mutant
alleles of wee1 (Fantes, 1981; Fantes and Nurse, 1978;
Russell and Nurse, 1987; Thuriaux et al., 1978). The
G2/M cell size checkpoint is missing in wee1 mutants, so
cells initiate mitosis at a length that is much shorter than
the wild-type. Currently, the timing of mitosis is determined by antagonistic activities of the Wee1 kinase and
the Cdc25 phosphatase, both acting on Tyr15 of Cdc2
(Murray and Hunt, 1993). For optimal cell growth and
survival, the S. pombe cells must be able to respond to
changes in nutrition by changing the rate of growth and
division (Fantes, 1977). Nutritional changes trigger the
G2/M cell size control mechanism, shifting the size that is
required for mitotic progression so that the cells that grow
in the rich medium divide with a longer cell size, but the
cells that grow in the poor medium divide with a smaller
cell size. Although yeast cells grow well on a variety of
carbon sources, they grow fastest on glucose. Therefore,
fission yeast cells that grow logarithmically in a glucose
medium grow at least 3- to 4-fold faster and produce
longer daughter cells than they do after the diauxic shift
to ethanol. Also, when faced with severe shortages of nitrogen, the S. pombe cells are able to adapt by altering the
G2/M cell size control so that cells arrest in G1 with a much
reduced cell size. Without a sexual partner, the arrested
cells enter a long-term state of dormancy, also referred to
as G0 or quiescence, which allows long-term cell survival
and resistance to environmental stresses (Nasim et al.,
1989).
Rapid response to glucose (rrg1+) has been identified as
a glucose-inducible gene in S. pombe, which showed a
rapid decrease and increase in the mRNA level by glucose-deprivation and readdition (Kim et al., 2002). The
rapid response of the rrg1+ expression is under the posttranscriptional regulation of mRNA stability that is mediated by a downstream region of the poly (A) site. In this
study, the cellular function of rrg1+ was explored to find
some biological significance of the rapid glucosedependent regulation of its expression. Rrg1 is involved
in the negative regulation of cell proliferation and G2/M
progression, which provides a reasonable explanation for
its glucose-dependent expression.
313
Materials and Methods
Strains, culture media, and transformation The S. pombe
wild-type haploid strain JY741 (h− ade6-M210 ura4-D18 leu132) that was obtained from Dr. M. Yamamoto (University of
Tokyo, Japan) was used for the construction of the deletion mutant. The overproducing cells of the rrg1+. S. pombe temperature-sensitive mutant Q356 (h+ leu1-32 cdc25-22) was a generous gift from Dr. Paul G. Young (Queen’s University, Canada);
it was utilized for cell-cycle synchronization by the temperature
block-release method (Alfa et al., 1993). The culture media was
an Edinburgh minimal medium (EMM) or a YE medium that
was supplemented with appropriate amino acids. Transformation
of S. pombe cells was routinely performed with 0.1 M LiAc (pH
4.9), as described previously (Alfa et al., 1993).
Northern blot analysis For the Northern blot analysis, total
RNA was isolated after extraction with phenol/chloroform/SDS,
as previously described (Jang et al., 1995; Jin et al., 1996).
About 15 µg of total RNA was separated in 1.5% agarose gel
that contained 0.67 M formaldehyde, transferred onto a nylon
membrane, and hybridized with radiolabeled probes. After
stringent washes, the blot was exposed to X-ray film or a phosphorimager (BAS1500; Fuji, Japan).
Western blot analysis The cells were grown to 5 × 106 cells/ml
and harvested. Total proteins were extracted in a breakage
buffer [100 mM Tris-HCl (pH8.0), 20% Glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 5
mM PMSF] (Alfa et al., 1993). About 20 µg of total protein was
loaded into each lane on an 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and
subsequently wet-transferred to a Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore, USA). The blot was probed with a 1:1,000 dilution of a
polyclonal anti-Rrg1 antibody. This primary antibody was detected by HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibodies
(Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA) and Enhanced ChemiLuminescence (ECL, Sigma).
Fluorescence microscopy The nucleus was visualized by staining with 2.0 µg/ml of 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI,
Sigma) in a mounting medium (Alfa et al., 1993). Septa were
visualized by 0.2 mg/ml of Calcofluor (fluorescent brightener,
Sigma). Yeast cells were fixed with 3% (w/v) paraformaldehyde,
as described previously (Alfa et al., 1993). An indirect immunofluorescence microscopy was performed using monoclonal
an anti-tubulin TAT1 antibody, and TRITC-conjugated donkey
anti-mouse IgG antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA).
Fluorescence was observed with Zeiss Axiophot and Axioskop 2
with a 100 W light source, Hamamatsu CCD camera and an
Openlab2 image-capturing software (Improvision).
Results and Discussion
G2/M progression and cell proliferation are accelerated in rrg1 deletion mutant Rrg1 is a novel protein,
314
Role of Rrg1 in G2/M Progression
A
B
Fig. 1. Deletion of the rrg1+ gene and its effects on cell proliferation and cell size. A. Strategy for the construction of rrg1
deletion mutant strain. B. Growth curves of the rrg1 deletion
mutant. Inoculating the wild-type (JY741) and the rrg1 deletion
mutant cells at the same value of OD595, the cells were cultivated continuously at 30°C in a rich medium (YES). At each
time point, the portions of the cell cultures were collected and
each OD595 value was measured. C. The JY741 (Up) and rrg1
deletion mutant (Bottom) cells were cultivated in a rich medium
(YES) and the each exponentially-growing cell was collected
for formaldehyde fixation, followed by calcofluor staining and
microscopic observation. Scale bar, 10 µm.
which has no significant sequence homology to other
known proteins. In an attempt to elucidate its cellular
function, the rrg1 deletion mutant was generated. The
coding region of rrg1+ was substituted with a 1.8 kb HindIII fragment of the ura4+ gene and the recombinant HindIII DNA fragment that was used to transform the JY741
cells (Fig. 1A). The displacement of rrg1+ from the chromosome was confirmed by a Southern blot analysis after
selecting the Ura+ cells in the uracil-deficient medium
(data not shown). The resulting haploid deletion mutant of
rrg1+, MJK1 (h− ade6-M210 ura4-D18 leu1-32 rrg1::
ura4+), was viable, which suggests that the Rrg1 protein
is not essential for cell viability.
Since the rrg1+ expression is regulated by glucose, a
major energy source for cell growth, the effect of the rrg1
deletion on cellular proliferation was examined. The rrg1
null mutant proliferated much faster than the isogenic
wild-type cells (Fig. 1B). The estimated doubling time of
the mutant was 110 min in a rich (YE) medium, while that
of the wild-type cells was 150 min. These results indicate
that Rrg1 might negatively control cell proliferation. In
addition, the rrg1 deletion mutant divided with into a
smaller cell size, compared with the wild-type cells. The
mutant produced daughter cells with an average length of
6 µm; whereas, the wild-type cells averaged 7.5 µm (Fig.
Fig. 2. Effect of Rrg1-overexpression on cell proliferation. Wild
type-cells (JY741) that carried the plasmid that contained the
rrg1+ gene under the control of the nmt1 promoter (Rrg1-REP1)
were grown in a minimal medium in the presence of 5 µM thiamine. At the time point of 0, the cells were shifted to minimal
media with or without thiamine to repress or induce the Rrg1
expression, respectively, and incubated at 30°C. A. The growth
curves of the cells that were cultured in the presence ({) or the
absence („) of thiamine. B. Western blot analyses to confirm
the cellular amount of the Rrg1 protein at each time point in the
inducing (−T) or in the repressing (+T) conditions.
1C). Cell growth is tightly coupled with cell-cycle progression in order to maintain constant cell size; this sizing
mechanism is linked to mitotic control in S. pombe
(Breeding et al., 1998; Murray and Hunt, 1993). Therefore, the reduced cell size of the rrg1 mutant implies that
the mitotic control was altered and G2/M transition was
initiated faster in the absence of Rrg1, which indicates
Rrg1 involvement in G2/M cell size control. G2/M cell
size control, which coordinates cell growth and division,
is one of the most fundamental processes during cell proliferation (Fantes, 1977). Cells regulate their division by
this size control in accordance with nutritional conditions;
cells accelerate in a favored environment and slow down
in scarcity. Rrg1 appears to be involved in a part of the
slowing-down of the cell cycle at G2/M for this control.
However, it is not likely that Rrg1 plays a major role in
the cell cycle regulation, because the cell size changes
that originate from deletion or overproduction (see Fig. 3
and next paragraph) of Rrg1 were not comparable to those
shown in mutants of key regulators for G2/M progression,
Min Ji Kim et al.
315
Table 1. Distribution of cells on each phase of cell cycle when
Rrg1 is overproduced.
(%)
Rrg1-REP1 (+T)
Rrg1-REP1 (-T)
Interphase
Anaphase
Cytokinesis
85.4
96.4
11.7
1.8
2.9
1.8
All of 171 and 608 cells were counted for repressed (+T) and induced (-T) conditions, respectively.
cell growth. In contrast, the rrg1 deletion mutant showed
a reduced cell-doubling time, as well as a decrease in cell
size, which indicates that Rrg1 may also affect the cell
growth rate.
These results, therefore, suggest that Rrg1 might play a
role in the negative regulation of cell proliferation and
G2/M progression.
Fig. 3. Morphologies of G2 delayed cells with overproduced
Rrg1. The JY741 cells that carried the Rrg1-overproducing
plasmid under the control of the nmt1 promoter were cultured
with (A) or without (B−H) thiamine to repress or induce the
Rrg1 expression, respectively. The cells were fixed with formaldehyde and stained with 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)
for microscopic observation. (A, B) Under light and fluorescent
microscopic observation. Scale bar, 10 µm. (E) Indirect immunofluorescence assay with anti-tubulin antibody. (F−H) Calcofluor and DAPI staining.
such as wee1 or cdc25 (Murray and Hunt, 1993). Therefore, Rrg1 seems to be an accessory component of the
checkpoint system for “fine-tuning” of cell cycle progression. However, the cellular function of Rrg1 does not
seem to be restricted to the negative regulation of G2/M
progression, compared with the case of Wee1. Although
the temperature-sensitive mutant of wee1 are smaller
when grown at a restrictive temperature (35°C) than they
are when grown at a permissive temperature (25°C), the
duration of the cell cycle at both 35 and 25°C is identical
to that of a wild-type strain that is grown under the same
conditions (Murray and Hunt, 1993). When the wee1ts
cells were shifted from 25 to 35°C, the threshold cell size
that is required to pass the mitotic entry checkpoint is
greatly reduced. Therefore, the length of the cell cycle is
dramatically reduced since the cells no longer have to
double in size in order to divide. However, subsequent
cycles at 35°C are of normal duration since the cells
(smaller at birth) must spend the same amount of time to
again double in size before division under the constant
Overexpression of Rrg1 leads to G2 delay To confirm
the negative role of Rrg1 in G2/M progression, the effect
of the Rrg1 overexpression was investigated (Fig. 2). The
overproduced Rrg1, under the control of the nmt1 thiamine-repressible promoter (Maundrell, 1993), was detected in a Western blot analysis after thiamine was
washed out of the medium (Fig. 2B). As shown in Fig. 2A,
the rate of cell proliferation was immediately reduced
after the amount of Rrg1 was increased. Interestingly,
among the Rrg1-overproduced cells, the cells in the interphase (mononucleated cells) accumulated, while the percentages of the binuclear and septated cells were greatly
reduced, which represent the processes of anaphase and
cytokinesis in mitosis, respectively (Table 1). This suggests that the slow growth of the Rrg1-overproduced cells
might result from the inhibition of the mitotic entry. In
addition, the length of the mononucleated cells increased
up to 14−19 µm in the induced condition (-T), compared
with 12 µm in the repressed condition (+T) of the Rrg1
expression (Figs. 3A and 3B). The elongated cell also
demonstrated that mitosis was hindered, even after the
proper cell size was reached in the Rrg1-overexpression.
Moreover, the elongated cells had an altered shape in the
nuclear chromatin region; they appeared elongated and
loose (Fig. 3C). This phenomenon was not accompanied
by a α-tubulin signal (compare segregated binucleus with
α-tubulin and elongated mononucleus without α-tubulin
in Figs. 3D and 3E). This result suggests that the abnormally elongated nuclear shape in the Rrg1-overexpressed
cells was not the outcome of defective chromatin condensation with normal mitotic spindle, which was easily observed in mutants of chromatin condensation. The lack of
spindle microtubules indicates that the Rrg1-overexpressed cells were halted at G2 rather than in mitosis, and
that the elongated nuclear morphologies could then be
316
Role of Rrg1 in G2/M Progression
A
B
Fig. 4. Periodic changes in the rrg1+ mRNA level during cell
cycle. A. Synchronously-dividing cells were generated by the
temperature block-release method of cdc25-22 cells. After release to the permissive temperature (25°C), the cells were taken
for RNA isolation at each time point and the Northern blot was
probed for the indicated genes. B. The mRNA levels of rrg1+
and cdc22+ (indicator for G1/S) were quantified using a Imagemaster ID (Pharmacia Biotech) and plotted with a septation
index.
concluded as a general phenomenon that is shown in G2arrested cells (Nasim et al., 1989).
The G2 delay by the Rrg1 overexpression was leaky, and
there were cells that initiated and completed the mitosis in
a small portion (Table 1), which eventually led to cell
proliferation until the stationary phase (Fig. 2A). However, a considerable portion of the Rrg1-overproduced
cells that undergo mitosis showed an abnormal accumulation of septum material (Figs. 3F, 3G, and 3H). The fluorescent signal for the septum material that was stained by
calcofluor still remained, even after the cell fission was
complete. This implies that there were defects in the relocation of the septum material. These results raised the
possibility that the Rrg1 overexpression might affect cytokinesis, as well as G2 delay.
Cell-cycle dependent expression of rrg1+ The Rrg1 role
in the G2/M progression raised a question for the cellcycle dependent expression of rrg1+. To address this possibility, the transcript level of rrg1+ was measured during
the cell cycle. For this purpose, a synchronous cell population was generated by the block-release method of temperature-sensitive cdc25-22 cells (Alfa et al., 1993). Also,
the rrg1+ mRNA level was monitored after rescue from
the G2 arrest (Fig. 4). The mRNA levels of cdc22+ and
H2A1 were used as indicators for the G1/S peak (Lowndes
et al., 1992) and peak at the S phase, respectively;
whereas, ura4+ had a constant mRNA level during the
cell cycle. The Northern blot analysis revealed that the
rrg1+ transcript level slowed periodicity during the cell
cycle with a summit at the G2/M phase, according to the
levels of the indicator mRNAs and septation index (Fig.
4B). This cell-cycle dependent expression of rrg1+ that
peaked at G2/M may support the possible role of Rrg1 in
G2/M.
The cellular function of Rrg1 in cell proliferation and
cell cycle regulation provides a plausible explanation for
its glucose-dependent expression. Since glucose is a central energy source for cell proliferation, it is quite likely
that the genes that function for basic cellular growth (such
as rrg1+) are under the control of glucose. In addition, the
cellular growth-related genes need to be tightly regulated
by environmental cues for optimal cell growth, which
clearly explains the rapid response of the rrg1+ expression
to glucose and other fermentable sugars (Kim et al., 2002).
Considering the currently-available information about the
glucose-dependent expression in S. pombe, the knowledge
about the molecular regulation of the rrg1+ expression
and its cellular role is quite informative in understanding
how cells respond to glucose in fission yeast.
Acknowledgments We would like to thank Drs. M. Yamamoto and Paul G. Young for providing the S. pombe strains.
This research was supported in part by a grant from the Brain
Korea 21 from the Korean Ministry of Education.
References
Alfa, C., Fantes, P., Hyams, J., McLeaod, M., and Warbrick, E.
(1993) Experiments with fission yeas: A Laboratory Course
Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring
Harbor, NY.
Breeding, C. S., Hudson, J., Balasubramanian, M. K., Hemmingsen, S. M., Young, P. G., and Gould, K. L. (1998) The
cdr2+ gene encodes a regulator of G2/M progression and cytokinesis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Biol. Cell 9,
3399−3415.
DeRisi, J. L., Iyer, V. R., and Brown, P. O. (1997) Exploring the
metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 278, 680−686.
Donachie, W. D. (1968) Relationship between cell size and time
of initiation of DNA replication. Nature 219, 1077−1079.
Fantes, P. A. (1977) Control of cell size and cycle time in
Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Sci. 24, 51−67.
Fantes, P. A. (1981) Isolation of cell size mutants of a fission
yeast by a new selective method: characterization of mutants
and implications for division control mechanisms. J. Bacte-
Min Ji Kim et al.
riol. 146, 746−754.
Fantes, P. A. and Nurse, P. (1978) Control of the timing of cell
division in fission yeast. Cell size mutants reveal a second
control pathway. Exp. Cell. Res. 115, 317−329.
Jang, Y. K., Jin, Y. H., Kim, M. J., Seong, R. H., Hong, S. H.,
and Park, S. D. (1995) A simple and efficient method for the
isolation of total RNA from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 37, 339−344.
Jin, Y. H., Jang, Y. K., Kim, M. J., Koh, J. B., Park, J. K., Choi,
I. S., and Park, S. D. (1996) Isolation of hrp2+ gene, a new
member of SNF2/SWI2 family from fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cells 6, 504−507.
Killander, D. and Zetterberg, A. (1965) A quantitative cytochemical investigation of the relationship between cell mass
and initiation of DNA synthesis in mouse fibroblasts in vitro.
Exp. Cell. Res. 40, 12−20.
Kim, M. J., Kim, J. B., Kim, D. S., and Park, S. D. (2002) Glucose-inducible expression of rrg1+ in Schizosaccharomyces
pombe: post-transcriptional regulation of mRNA stability
mediated by the downstream region of the poly(A) site. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 1145−1153.
Lowndes, N. F., McInerny, C. J., Johnson, A. L., Fantes, P. A.,
and Johnston, L. H. (1992) Control of DNA synthesis genes
317
in fission yeast by the cell-cycle gene cdc10+. Nature 355,
449−453.
Maundrell, K. (1993) Thiamine-repressible expression vectors
pREP and pRIP for fission yeast. Gene 123, 127−130.
Murray, A. W. and Hunt, T. (1993) The Cell Cycle: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, New York.
Nasim, A., Young, P., and Johnson, B. F. (1989) Molecular Biology of the Fission Yeast, Academic Press, San Diego.
Ozcan, S. and Johnston, M. (1999) Function and regulation of
yeast hexose transporters. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63,
554−569.
Russell, P. and Nurse, P. (1987) Negative regulation of mitosis
by wee1+, a gene encoding a protein kinase homolog. Cell 49,
559−567.
Thuriaux, P., Nurse, P., and Carter, B. (1978) Mutants altered in
the control coordinating cell division with cell growth in the
fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Gen. Genet.
161, 215−220.
Zetterberg, A. and Killander, D. (1965) Quantitative cytophotometric and autoradiographic studies on the rate of protein
synthesis during interphase in mouse fibroblasts in vitro. Exp.
Cell. Res. 40, 1−11.