* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Multiomics of tomato glandular trichomes reveals
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Isotopic labeling wikipedia , lookup
Two-hybrid screening wikipedia , lookup
Silencer (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Basal metabolic rate wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression wikipedia , lookup
Secreted frizzled-related protein 1 wikipedia , lookup
Fatty acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Biosynthesis wikipedia , lookup
Paracrine signalling wikipedia , lookup
Endogenous retrovirus wikipedia , lookup
Proteolysis wikipedia , lookup
Amino acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Citric acid cycle wikipedia , lookup
Gene regulatory network wikipedia , lookup
Fatty acid metabolism wikipedia , lookup
Expression vector wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Metabolic network modelling wikipedia , lookup
Biochemical cascade wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacometabolomics wikipedia , lookup
Plant Cell Advance Publication. Published on April 13, 2017, doi:10.1105/tpc.17.00060 LARGE-SCALEBIOLOGY MultiomicsofTomatoGlandularTrichomesRevealsDistinctFeaturesof CentralCarbonMetabolismSupportingHighProductivityofSpecialized Metabolites GerdU.Balcke1,StefanBennewitz1,NickBergau1,BenediktAthmer1,AnjaHenning1,Petra Majovsky2,3,JoséM.Jiménez-Gómez4,5,WolfgangHoehenwarter2,AlainTissier1 1 LeibnizInstituteofPlantBiochemistry,Dept.ofCellandMetabolicBiology,Weinberg3,D-06120 Halle(Saale),Germany, 2 LeibnizInstituteofPlantBiochemistry,ProteomeAnalytics,Weinberg3,D-06120Halle/S.,Germany. 3 Currentaddress:CelerionSwitzerlandAG,Allmendstrasse32,8320Fehraltorf,Switzerland. 4 MaxPlanckInstituteforPlantBreedingResearch,Carl-von-Linné-Weg10,50829Cologne,Germany. 5 Currentaddress:InstitutJean-PierreBourgin,INRA,AgroParisTech,CNRS,UniversitéParis-Saclay, RD10,78026VersaillesCedex,France. Correspondingauthor:AlainTissier([email protected]) Shorttitle:Metabolicnetworkoftomatoglandulartrichomes One-sentencesummary:Multi-omicsandstableisotopelabelingappliedtotomatoglandular trichomesrevealuniquefeaturesforthesupplyofenergy,reducingpowerandcarboninthese metaboliccellfactories. Abstract Glandulartrichomesaremetaboliccellfactorieswiththecapacitytoproducelargequantitiesof secondarymetabolites.Littleisknownabouttheconnectionbetweencentralcarbonmetabolism andmetabolicproductivityforsecondarymetabolitesinglandulartrichomes.Toaddressthisgapin ourknowledge,weperformedcomparativemetabolomics,transcriptomics,proteomicsand13ClabelingoftypeVIglandulartrichomesandleavesfromacultivated(SolanumlycopersicumLA4024) andawild(SolanumhabrochaitesLA1777)tomatoaccession.Specificfeaturesofglandulartrichomes thatdrivetheformationofsecondarymetabolitescouldbeidentified.TomatotypeVItrichomesare photosyntheticbutacquiretheircarbonessentiallyfromleafsucrose.Theenergyandreducing powerfromphotosynthesisareusedtosupportthebiosynthesisofsecondarymetabolites,whilethe comparativelyreducedCalvin-Benson-Basshamcycleactivitymaybeinvolvedinrecyclingmetabolic CO2.Glandulartrichomescopewithoxidativestressbyproducinghighlevelsofpolyunsaturatedfatty acids,oxylipins,andglutathione.Finally,distinctmechanismsarepresentinglandulartrichomesto increasethesupplyofprecursorsfortheisoprenoidpathways.Particularly,thecitrate-malateshuttle suppliescytosolicacetylCoAandplastidicglycolysisandmalicenzymesupporttheformationof plastidicpyruvate.Amodelisproposedonhowglandulartrichomesachievehighmetabolic productivity. 1 ©2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved Introduction Glandulartrichomes(GTs)arespecializedsecretorycellsthatprotrudefromtheepidermisof approximately30%ofallvascularplants(Fahn,2000).ThemorphologyofGTsisverydiverse acrossplantspeciesasexemplifiedbythepeltatetrichomesoftheLamiaceae,thebiseriate trichomes of the Asteraceae or the capitate trichomes of the Solanaceae. But they are all multicellularandshareabasicplanwithbasal,stalk,andonetoafew(typically4–8)glandular headcells(Croteauetal.,2005;Glasetal.,2012).Theglandularheadcellshaveincommon thecapacitytoproducesubstancesofrelevancetothechemicalcommunicationoftheplant with its environment, including short branched chain acyl sugars, flavonoids, phenolics, alkaloids,andisoprenoids(Schilmilleretal.,2009;Schilmilleretal.,2010;Schmidtetal.,2011; Kimetal.,2012;Brückneretal.,2014;Lietal.,2014).Someofthesesecondarymetabolites wereshowntohaveantifeedant,ovipositiondeterrent,andinsomecasestoxicproperties towardsinsects(Coatesetal.,1988;Nonomuraetal.,2009;Bleekeretal.,2011;Bleekeret al.,2012;Glasetal.,2012).Furthermore,secondarymetabolitesproducedinGTshavehigh commercial value in the cosmetics, food, and pharmaceutical industries. For instance, artemisinin,asesquiterpenelactoneofArtemisiaannua,anditsderivativesincombination therapy are currently regarded as the most effective treatment against malaria (Kokwaro, 2009). OnenotablefeatureofGTsistheirmetabolicproductivity.Forexample,acylsugars(AS)in Solanumpennelliicanrepresentupto20%oftheleafdryweight(Fobesetal.,1985)andin certainSolanumhabrochaitesaccessionssesquiterpenecarboxylicacidsmayreachmorethan 12%oftheleafdryweight(FrelichowskiandJuvik,2005).Thesefiguressupportthenotion thatGTscanbeconsideredashighlyactivemetaboliccellfactoriesbecausethecompounds are produced exclusively there. For volatile compounds, this high productivity is often associated with dedicated storage features in the GT. For example, in tomato and many Lamiaceae species, the secreted metabolites are stored in an extracellular cavity whose volumecanswelltoamultipleofthevolumeoftheglandularheadcells(Turneretal.,2000; Bergauetal.,2015). TodatethereisnoconceptualmodeltoexplainhowGTsachievesuchremarkablemetabolic productivity.MoststudiesonGTsofarhavefocusedontheidentificationandcharacterization ofenzymesdirectlyinvolvedintheformationofthemajortrichomesecondarymetabolites 2 (Croteauetal.,2005;Slocombeetal.,2008;Sallaudetal.,2009;Schmidtetal.,2011;Kimet al.,2012;Schilmilleretal.,2012;Brückneretal.,2014),andnocomprehensivestudyhasbeen conductedtolinkthedownstreambiosynthesisstepstocentralandenergymetabolismsin these cells. Understanding how the core metabolic network in these specialized cells is organizedtodeliversuchhighproductivitylevelswilloffernewopportunitiesinthebreeding of plants with increased resistance to various aggressors and in metabolic engineering in general.Tomato,duetoitsexcellentgeneticresourcesandextensivesequencedata,including sequenced genomes from cultivated tomato and several closely related wild relatives, can serveasagoodmodelforthestudyofthephysiologyanddevelopmentofGTs(Tissier,2012). Forthisstudy,thecultivatedtomatoSolanumlycopersicumLA4024(hereafterreferredtoas LA4024)andanaccessionfromawildrelative,S.habrochaitesLA1777(hereafterreferredto asLA1777),werechosenasstudymaterial.ThemostabundantGTsinbothspeciesareoftype VI,whichconferadistinctsecondarymetaboliteprofiletoeachspecies(Bergauetal.,2015). InLA4024,themajormetabolitesproducedaretheflavonoidrutinandvariousmonoterpenes (e.g.a-phellandrene),whereasLA1777producesmostlysesquiterpenecarboxylicacids(SCAs) andacylsugars(McDowelletal.,2011;Glasetal.,2012).Ourrationalewastocomparethe trichomesandtherespectivetrichome-freeleafinordertoidentifywhichfeaturesdistinguish thesetwotissuesandtounderstandwhatmakesthetrichomesunique.Ourcomparisonis basedonfoursetsofdata,respectivelyfromtranscriptomics,proteomics,metabolomics,and 13 C-labeling,whichwereprocessedbyuni-andmultivariateanalysesandusedtoaddresstwo majorquestions:HowdoGTsgeneratetheenergyneededtoproducetheselargeamountsof secondaryproductsandwhatarethecarbonsourcesthatfuelmetaboliteproduction? Results Morphology Intomato,sevenclassesoftrichomeshavebeendescribed.Fourofthemareglandular,among whichtypeI,IVandVIandVIIarepresentinLA1777,whiletypeI,VIandVIIoccurinLA4024 (McDowell et al., 2011; Glas et al., 2012). LA1777 is a wild tomato accession with roundshaped type VI trichomes as the dominant trichome type covering the leaf surface at high density(Figure1).ThecultivatedtomatoLA4024iscloselyrelatedtoS.lycopersicumcv.Heinz whosegenomewasrecentlypublished(Consortium,2012).Itsdominatingtrichometypeisa 3 four-leafclover-shapedtypeVI,whichoccursatalowerdensitythaninLA1777(Bergauetal., 2015). Inbothspecies,basedonmicroscopyanalysis,leaftrichomepreparationscontainedabout 80%typeVIglandularheadcellsand20%typeI/IVheadcellsinLA1777and20%typeIhead cellsinLA4024,respectively.Furthermore,itwasnotpossibletofullyremovethestalkcells ofbothtypesofglandularheads,whichaccountedfor37%ofallharvestedcells.IntypeVI trichomes, four glandular head cells surround a storage cavity filled with secondary metabolites,whichistypicallymuchlargerinthewildtomato(Bergauetal.,2015).Likeleaf mesophyllcells,theglandularheadcellsoftypeVItrichomespossesstheirownchloroplasts withintactthylakoidmembranes,suggestingtheyhavethecapacitytogeneratetheATPand NADPHrequiredfortheassemblyofsecondarymetabolites.Notably,theouterenvelope(cell wall+cuticle)oftypeVIGTcellsofbothtomatospeciesisslightlythickerthanthatofleaf epidermalcells(about0.7µmversus0.5µm)and3–5timesthickerthanthedoublecellwall betweenleafparenchymacells(Figure1).Thissuggeststhat,asinepidermalcells,gasand waterexchangewiththeoutsidearelimited. Metabolomics Central metabolites are mostly polar. Therefore, to better understand the connection betweenprimaryandsecondarymetabolisminglandulartrichomes,non-targetedprofiling forpolarandsemi-polarmetaboliteswascarriedoutseparatelyusingtwoLC-MSmethods and one GC-MS method (see Methods). Unless indicated, all metabolomics data discussed belowshowedsignificantfoldchangesbasedonpairwiset-testingatasignificancelevelofp <0.05.FordetailsseeSupplementalDatasets1–3. Thetrichomesofwildandcultivatedtomatoproducedifferentsecondarymetabolites As expected, metabolite profiling of secondary metabolites revealed significant differences notonlybetweenbothspeciesbutalsobetweenthetrichomeandleafwithinaspecies(Figure 2, Supplemental Dataset 1). Venn diagrams show only 27% of the up- and 23% of the downregulated mass features in trichomes versus leaves as shared patterns between both tomato species (Supplemental Figure 1). Principal component analysis (PCA) of semi-polar 4 secondary metabolites measured by LC-MS separated both tomato lines on PC1 with 78% coverageofvariance,indicatingverydifferentcompositioninthesecondarymetabolitesof both species (Figure 2A). PC2 (15%) separated trichomes from leaves across the two lines, demonstrating also joined latent similarities in the patterns of leaves and trichomes, respectively.Here,signalsrelatingtotheglycoalkaloidstomatineanddehydrotomatine,which areexclusivelyfoundintheleaves,stronglycontributedtothegroupseparation.Intrichomes, the total ion chromatograms of LA4024 were dominated by monoterpenes (GC-MS) and conjugated flavonols (mainly rutin, LC-MS), while sesquiterpenes (GC-MS), short branched chain(C2-C12)acylsugars,andsesquiterpenecarboxylicacidsareprevalentinLC-MS-based chromatogramsofLA1777(SupplementalFigure2).Theseresultsconfirmpreviousmetabolite analysesoftomatotrichomesandunderlinethattrichomesofthesespeciesproducedifferent terpenoidsecondarymetabolites(Slocombeetal.,2008;Besseretal.,2009;Schilmilleretal., 2010;McDowelletal.,2011;Ekanayakaetal.,2014;Ghoshetal.,2014;Lietal.,2014).When quantified,rutinalonecontributedto25±3%ofthecorrespondingtrichomedryweightin LA4024,whereasthesumoftwomajorsesquiterpenecarboxylicacids((+)-(E)-α-santalene12-oic acid and (+)-(E)-endo-bergamotene-12-oic acid) added up to 23 ± 2% of the GT dry weightinLA1777.BothvaluesillustratethecapabilityofGTtodirectmassivecarbonfluxes towards distinct classes of secondary metabolites. To estimate the productivity of type VI trichomes in the two species regarding terpenoids, we quantified the major sesquiterpene carboxylicacids,i.e.,santalenoicandbergamotenoicacids,inLA1777andthemajorterpenes (mostly monoterpenes and minor sesquiterpenes) in LA4024 in surface extracts of young leafletsandinparallelestimatedthetrichomenumbersofleafletsofcomparablesize.We found 6563 ± 618 (n=3) type VI trichomes per leaflet in LA1777 and 1804 ± 276 (n=5) in LA4024.Thisgave65.82±7.85ng(n=3)ofSCAspertrichomeinLA1777versus0.68±0.20ng (n=5)ofterpenespertrichomeinLA4024.Thus,theterpeneproductivityintypeVItrichomes ofLA1777isaround97timeshigherthaninthoseofLA4024. NewlyidentifiedmetabolitesincludeabundantoxylipinsderivedfromC18-andC20-PUFAs Interestingly,wedetectedhighintensitiesoffreesaturated,mono-andpolyunsaturatedfatty acids(PUFAs)thatwerefoundtobepreferentiallyenrichedinthetrichomesofbothtomatoes (SupplementalFigure3A).Themostabundantwere18:2linoleicand18:3linolenicacidinboth species and a C20:3-eicosatrienoic and C20:4-arachidonic acid in LA1777. The presence of 5 polyunsaturatedC20fattyacidsinLA1777isnoteworthy,sincethesearerareinplantsand wereshowntomodulateplantresponsestostress(Savchenkoetal.,2010).Correspondingto thechainlengthofthefattyacids,numerousoxylipinsthatstronglyaccumulatedinGTsas comparedtothecorrespondingleaveswerealsodetected.Amongthese,dihydroxy-C18:1/ C18:2,hydroxy-C18:2/C18:3,trihydroxy-C18:3,hydroxy-C20:2/C20:3/C20:4anddihydroxy20:4/C20:5weremostabundant,withtheC20-oxylipinsagainaccumulatingpreferentiallyin LA1777(SupplementalFigure3B).WecomparedLCretentiontimeandtheMS2spectraof hydroxy-C18:2withauthenticstandardsoftheoxylipins13S-hydroxy-9Z,11E-octadecadienoic acid (13(S)-HODE) and 9S-hydroxy-10E,12Z-octadecadienoic acid (9(S)-HODE). Both substances with a precursor ion [M-H] of 295.227 amu co-eluted with a peak at 13.6 min, which was also observed in GTs of both species. Yet, collision-induced dissociation (CID)spectraofthecompoundfromLA1777trichomesmatchedtheCID-spectraof(9(S)-HODE), whereas those from LA4024 trichomes matched the spectra of 13(S)-HODE (Supplemental Figure4). Trichome-specificfeaturesofcentralcarbonandenergymetabolism Tosurveythehydrophilicmetabolitesinvolvedincentralcarbonandenergymetabolism,we compared the peak areas of 115 selected MS1 mass/ retention time features of known identity.Thoseincludedintermediatesofthetricarboxylicacid(TCA)cycle,sugarphosphates, freeaminoacids,redoxcouplesofglutathioneandNADcofactorsaswellasnucleotidesand intermediatesofbothisoprenoidprecursorpathways.Vennanalysisshowedthatmorethan athirdofallsignalsweresharedacrossbothtomatomodelsascommonfeaturesbetween trichomesandleaves,respectively(SupplementalFigure1). PCAidentifiedthreeprincipalcomponentswhichcover89.4%ofthevarianceinthedata.In thiscase,PCAshowedastrongergroupseparationbetweentrichomesandleavesacrossthe tomatolines(PC137.9%)thantheseparationbetweenbothtomatolinesonPC2(33.8%).This indicates that, regardless of the tomato species, type VI-GTs have a highly distinct central carbon and energy metabolism compared to leaves (Supplemental Figure 5). Also, cross validationusingfiveoutofsixseriespertomatospeciestopredictthemissingdataseriesand agoodpredictabilityofmetabolomedataofLA4024fromLA1777andviceversaunderline 6 this(SupplementalDataset4).Toidentifyfeaturesthatdistinguishtrichomesfromleavesas theresponsevariables,partialleastsquareanalysis(PLS)wascarriedoutindividuallyforboth species. This analysis showed a strong group separation based on Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB)cycleintermediates,ADP-glucose,andglyceratewithlowerpeakintensitiesintrichome samples as compared to leaves (e.g., ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate: 9.2-fold (LA1777), 8.6-fold (LA4024); 3-phosphoglycerate: 5.3-fold (LA1777), 1.7-fold (LA4024); ADP-glucose: 10.6-fold (LA1777), 8.6-fold (LA4024)) (Figure 3, Supplemental Dataset 3). Notably, the latter metabolitesareinvolvedinphotosyntheticcarbonfixationandinstarchbiosynthesis,which appeartobelessactiveintrichomesthaninleaves.Besidesthis,trichomesofLA1777and LA4024accumulatedlargeamountsofinositolpolyphosphates(IP5andIP6)whichwerenot detectedintheleaves(SupplementalDataset3). Similarly,oxidizedglutathioneshowedincreasedlevelsinthetrichomesofbothspecies(i.e., in LA1777, GSSG: 1.2-fold (p=0.07); in LA4024, GSSG: 1.9-fold, Supplemental Dataset 3). Althoughthereducedformofglutathionewas1.5-(LA1777)and3.7-fold(LA4024)higherin theleaves,importantly,theratiobetweenoxidizedandreducedglutathioneisshiftedtomuch highervaluesinGTsthaninleaves(inLA1777,Leaves:0.9,GTs:1.7;inLA4024,Leaves:0.4, GT: 2.8). Thus, in trichomes a much larger fraction of the glutathione pool is oxidized. Moreover, cystine levels were 4.6 and 5.3 times higher in GTs of LA1777 and LA4024, respectively, implying increased replenishment of GSH in GTs. Ascorbate, another electron scavenger,showeddecreasedlevelsintrichomesrelativetoleavesinLA1777(2.5-fold)and wasstronglydepletedinthetrichomesofLA4024(Figure3,SupplementalDataset3). TCAintermediatessuchasaconitate(ACT)andsuccinate(SUC)wereincreasedintrichomes versusleaf(ACT:1.4-fold(LA1777),3.5-fold(LA4024);SUC:2.3-fold(LA4024)orshowedno significantdifferencebetweentrichomeandleaf(LA1777).Finally,cyclicformsofAMPand GMPshowedmuchhigherintensitiesinGTsthaninleaves(cAMP:4.0-fold,cGMP:3.5-fold (LA1777);cAMP:9.2-fold,cGMP:18.4-fold(LA4024))(SupplementalDataset3).Interestingly, the ATP levels in leaves and trichomes were comparable for both tomato species (SupplementalDataset3). 7 Intermediates of secondary metabolite precursor pathways are overrepresented in trichomes SinceGTsofLA4024andLA1777inparticularproduceterpenoidsfromboththemevalonate (MEV) and the 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathways, metabolites of these pathways were measured, when possible. 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMGCoA), an intermediate of the isoprenoid biosynthesis via the MEV pathway also showed increased levels in the trichomes of both species (2.5-fold (LA1777) and 4.3-fold (LA4024)) versusleaves(SupplementalDataset3).InLA1777,intermediatesoftheMEPpathwayshowed upto7-foldhigherlevelsintrichomesthaninleaves(SupplementalDataset3)andaremajor contributorstothegroupseparationbetweenleavesandtrichomesofbothspecies(Figure 3A). Correspondingly, signals for cytidyl nucleotides, which are required for this pathway (Caspietal.,2014),aresignificantlyupregulatedinthetrichomes(SupplementalDataset3). Theseresultsareinaccordancewiththehighlevelsofsesquiterpenoidsthataresynthesized intheplastidsofGTviatheMEPpathwayinLA1777(Besseretal.,2009;Sallaudetal.,2009; Schilmilleretal.,2009).Bycontrast,metaboliclevelsoftheMEPpathwayintermediatesand cytidylnucleotideswerenotormoderatelyincreasedinGTsofLA4024,withMEPshowinga 3.7-fold higher level than in the corresponding leaf as the metabolite with the largest difference (Supplemental Dataset 3). Threonine and valine, which are involved in the formationofbranchedshortchainacylresiduesofacylsugars(AS)weresignificantlyelevated in the trichomes of LA1777 but not in LA4024, where AS were much less abundant (Supplemental Dataset 3). In agreement with the increased lipid formation in GTs of both species (see above) malonyl-CoA was strongly increased in GT (4.3-fold (LA1777), 2.5-fold (LA4024))(SupplementalDataset3). Together, the metabolite profiles of hydrophilic metabolites reflect that intermediates requiredforthebiosynthesisoftrichome-specificsecondarymetabolitesarepresentathigh levels,especiallyforthebiosynthesisofterpenoids.Inaddition,glandulartrichomesofLA1777 appearedtobemetabolicallymoreactivethanthoseofLA4024. 8 Transcriptomics,Proteomics,and13C-Labeling Tocorrelateourmetabolomicsdatawithgeneexpression,weperformedtranscriptomicand proteomic analysis on the same samples. The transcriptomics data were generated with a custom-designedmicroarraybasedonRNA-Seqdatathatwereproducedforthisproject(see Methods). Wereportquantile-normalizedtranscriptomedataandproteomedataofbiologicaltriplicates ofisolatedtrichomesandtrichome-freeleaves(SupplementalDataset5).Unlessindicated,all datadiscussedbelowshowedsignificantfold-changesatasignificancelevelp<0.05.Aglobal overviewoftherelativetranscriptandproteinlevelsintrichomesandtrichome-freeleaves withregardstocellularmetabolismisprovidedinFigure4(transcriptomicsofLA1777)and SupplementalFigures6and7(transcriptomicsandproteomicsofLA4024andproteomicsof LA1777).Venndiagramsshowingcommonpatternsofleafandtrichome-specificomicsdata across both tomato models (ca. 26–30%) as well as species-specific data are shown in SupplementalFigure1. GlandulartrichomesconstituteastrongsucrosesinkwithlowCalvin-Benson-BasshamCycle (CBB)activitybuthighexpressionofphotosystemgenes OneoutstandingquestionconcernstheoriginofthecarbonsupplytoGTs.Unlikemintpeltate GTs, tomato GTs possess chloroplasts. This raises the question of whether carbon fixation takesplaceinthesecellsand,ifso,towhatextentitcontributestothecarbonsupplyofthe GTsoriftheydependonleavesastheirmaincarbonsupplier.Toanswerthesequestions,we examinedourtranscriptomicsandproteomicsdata.First,analysisofthetranscriptomedata of genes involved in sucrose degradation showed that several cell walls and cytosolic invertasesaswellassucrosesynthasesweresignificantly(p<0.05witht-teststatistics)overrepresentedintrichomescomparedtoleaves(Figure5).Thisisparticularlyclearforsucrose synthaseswherethecumulativeexpressionofthetwomajorisoformsis7.5and7.4times higherinGTsinLA1777andLA4024,respectively.Conversely,thecumulatedexpressionof invertaseinhibitorsis10.5-and19.3-foldstrongerinleavesversustrichomesofLA1777and LA4024, respectively. Additionally, genes encoding sucrose symporters, which are typically involvedinsucroseexport,areexpressedatlevelsthatare6.4and6.9timeshigherinleaves than in trichomes of LA1777 and LA4024, respectively (Supplemental Dataset 5). These 9 expressionprofileswereconfirmedbyRT-qPCR(SupplementalTable1).Enrichmentanalysis demonstrated overrepresentation of genes and proteins involved in plastidic and cytosolic glycolysisinGTs,butthiseffectwassignificantonlyinLA1777(SupplementalDataset6). Next,wefoundthattranscriptsencodingenzymesoftheCBBcyclewereamongthetop2000 highest expressed genes only in the leaf samples of both tomato species but not in their trichomes (Figure 6A and B). Here, the difference in transcript levels between leaves and trichomes was significant (Figure 7), with average fold-changes within this ontology group being6.3(LA1777)and8.4(LA4024).Theseresultsareconsistentwiththeproteinabundances obtainedfromshotgunproteomics(SupplementalDataset5),RT-qPCRofselectedCBBcycle genes(SupplementalTable1),andthemetaboliteprofilesofCBBintermediates(Figure3).On average,genesencodingphotorespiration,whichiscloselycoupledtotheactivityoftheCBB cycle,showedupto22-fold(LA1777)and34-fold(LA4024)lowerexpressionandupto4-fold (LA1777) and 46-fold (LA4024) lower protein levels in GTs as compared to leaves of the correspondingspecies(Figure4,SupplementalFigures6and7,SupplementalDatasets5and SupplementalTable1).Bothatthetranscriptandproteinlevels,enrichmentanalysesrevealed strongleaf-specificoverrepresentationofsignalswithintheMapManontologygroups1.2PSphotorespirationand1.3PS.CBB-cycle(SupplementalDataset6).Furthermore,transcriptsof carbonic anhydrase (CA) showed leaf-specific expression and higher protein abundance in leavesthanintrichomes(LA17772.8-fold;LA40248.5-fold,p<0.05). Paralleling lower ADP-glucose levels in GTs, glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase, a unidirectional starch biosynthesis enzyme, showed significantly lower transcript (2- and 3fold)andprotein(13-and57-fold)levelsinGTsofbothspeciesascomparedtotheirleaves (Figure7,SupplementalDataset5).Likewise,starchmetabolismwasoverrepresentedatthe transcriptlevelintheleavesofbothtomatospecies(SupplementalDataset6). By contrast, genes of photosystems (PS) I and II represented the ontology class with the highest expression levels in all samples (leaves and trichomes of both species). Although expressionlevelswerehigherinleavesformostofthehighlyabundantPSIandPSIIgenes, theselevelsdifferedbylessthantwo-foldwhencomparingtrichomesandleaves(Figure6C, Figure7,SupplementalDataset5).SincemanyPSproteinsareintegratedinmembranes,they couldnotbereliablydetectedbytheproteomicsmethodused. 10 13 C-CO2andglucoselabelingconfirmglandulartrichomesassinkorgans 13 C-labelingofLA1777with13C-CO2showedsignificantlyslowerincorporationof13C-isotopes into3-phosphoglycerate(3-PGA)andribulose-1,5-bisphosphate(RU-1,5-BP)despitesmaller poolsizesintrichomesversusleaves(Figure8A).Forexample,after10minthepercentageof labeledCinRU-1,5-BPisonly8%intrichomes,versus68%inleaves.Becausethepoolsizeis smallerinGT,inabsoluteamountofC,thisrepresentsa32-foldhigherincorporationofCO2 in leaves versus trichomes. In contrast to the CBB intermediates, the fraction of label in sucroseinthetrichomesisnotsignificantlydifferenttothatofleavesafter10min,andof31% versus50%intheleavesafter30min(Figure8A).Also,inabsoluteamounts(basedonpeak area),theincorporationoflabelinsucroseintrichomesismuchhigherthanthatinRU-1,5BP, indicating that in GT sucrose must be largely imported from the leaves. The pattern distribution of heavy isotopologs in sucrose was similar for leaf and trichome but the 13C enrichment in trichomes lagged behind the 13 C-enrichment observed in the leaf (SupplementalFigure8A;SupplementalDataset7(standarddeviationisotopologs)).Similar enrichmentof3-PGA(68%after10minand84%after30min)andRU-1,5-BP(68%after10 minand81%after30min)with13CdemonstratesthattheCBBcycleinleavesislargelyfedby atmosphericCO2(Figure8A).Bycontrast,inGTs,strongerenrichmentwith13Cof3-PGA(22% after10minand44%after30min)thanofRU-1,5-BP(8%after10minand32%after30min) upon 13C-CO2labelingisobserved.Thisindicatesthatthelabelin3-PGAinpartcomesfrom thebreakdownoflabeledsucroseimportedfromtheleaf. LabelingwithU13C-glucoseinambientCO2atmosphereresultedinintensiveincorporationof 13 C-label in sucrose (Figure 8B). Here, 13C enrichment in the trichomes lagged behind that observedinleaves.Interestingly,thelabelingpatternof13C-isotopologswassimilarbetween leavesandtrichomes,particularlyatthelatertimepoints(SupplementalFigure8).Amongthe heavier isotopologs, the signatures of 6x13C and 12x13C most strongly contributed to the labelingpatternsinleavesandtrichomes,whichcanbeinterpretedasdirectincorporationof U13C-glucoseintosucrosebysucrose-phosphatesynthaseintheleavesandtransportofsuch labeledsucroseintothetrichomes.Thefractionoflabelintheleavesin3-PGAandRU-1,5-BP is lower than with 13C-CO2, reflecting the incorporation of ambient 12C-CO2 (Figure 8B). Nonetheless, significant incorporation of label could be observed in CBB intermediates, indicatingreplenishmentof 13Cfromglucosecatabolism.Intrichomes,thisphenomenonis 11 exacerbated,resultingforexamplein30%labeledCinRU-1,5-BPafter24hversus17%inthe leaves(Figure8B).Thus,despitealowerfixationrateviatheCBBintrichomescomparedto leaves(Figure8A),refixationofCO2appearstoplayproportionallyastrongerpartintrichomes than in leaves. This is further supported by the pattern of labeling, showing preferential enrichment of heavier isotopologs in 3-PGA and RU-1,5-BP in trichomes versus leaves (SupplementalFigure8). DifferentialgeneexpressionisconsistentwiththemetabolitespectraobservedinGTsof wild-typeandcultivatedtomato Isoprenoid biosynthesis is highly active in GTs of both tomato species. Besides protein turnoverandRNAregulation,isoprenoidsynthesisrepresentedthecategorywithsomeofthe mosthighlyexpressedgenesinthetrichomesofLA1777andLA4024(Figure6).Bothspecies producehighlevelsofterpenesthataresynthesizedinthecytosol(sesquiterpenesinboth species)(vanDerHoevenetal.,2000)andintheplastids(monoterpenesforS.lycopersicum (Schilmilleretal.,2009)andsesquiterpenesforLA1777(Sallaudetal.,2009)).Therefore,one should expect high level expression of both the mevalonate and the methyl-erythritol phosphatepathwaysinbothspecies.Genesencodingenzymesoftheisoprenoidprecursor pathways and the corresponding proteins were strongly enriched in the trichomes (Supplemental Dataset 6) and showed significant trichome-specific expression (Figure 4, SupplementalFigure9)inbothaccessions.Accordingly,highexpressionofgenesandproteins of the MEV and MEP pathways as well as high levels of metabolic intermediates of these pathways could be measured (Supplemental Dataset 3). In LA1777 GTs, we note the particularlyhighlevelsofmethylerythritol-cyclodiphosphate(MEcPP),anintermediateofthe MEP pathway, which supplies precursors for the highly abundant sesquiterpene carboxylic acidsproducedinthisspecies(Figures3andSupplementalDataset3).Sincethegenesofboth theMEVandMEPpathwaysareover-expressedinGTs,exchangeofisoprenyldiphosphate precursorsbetweencompartmentsisunlikelybutcannotbeexcluded. Amino acid metabolism. Although significant in both lines, stronger differences in LA1777 thaninLA4024betweentrichomesandleavescouldbeobservedwithregardtoaminoacid metabolism(Figure4,SupplementalFigure6and7).InLA1777inparticular,themetabolism 12 ofbranchedchainaminoacidswasupregulated,illustratedbytheenrichmentanalysisofall transcripts (bin 13.4.2.1 in Supplemental Dataset 6) and genes such as those encoding 3isopropylmalate dehydratase (Solyc03g005730) or 2-isopropylmalate synthase (Solyc08g014230), which is consistent with the higher metabolite levels of valine, and leucine/isoleucine (Supplemental Datasets 3 and 5). Interestingly, genes involved in the degradation of branched chain amino acids, such as 3-hydroxyisobutyryl-CoA hydrolase (Solyc07g044710), 3-methyl-2-oxobutanoate dehydrogenase (Solyc04g063350), IsovalerylCoA dehydrogenase (Solyc06g073560) or Enoyl-CoA-hydratase (Solyc07g043680), are also over-expressedinGTs(SupplementalDataset5).Branchedchainaminoacidsareprecursors of acyl sugars, which are preferentially formed in LA1777 (Slocombe et al., 2008). We also observed high levels of aromatic amino acid decarboxylases in GTs (e.g., Solyc08g066250, SupplementalDataset5),whosefunctionisunclear. Flavonoidmetabolism.Severalgenesimplicatedinflavonoidmetabolismwereupregulated in trichomes with a strong contribution to the biosynthesis of chalcones, flavonols and dihydroflavonols(Figures4,SupplementalFigure6and7,SupplementalDataset5).Acommon patterninbothtomatospeciesisthesignificantenrichmentoftranscriptsandproteinsofthe MapManbin16.8(SupplementalDataset6),includingtranscriptsencodingproteinssuchas chalcone synthase (Solyc05g053550) or chalcone-flavonone isomerase (Solyc05g010320). Highest transcript and protein levels were observed in the trichomes of LA4024 as shown earlierindetailforS.lycopersicumM-82(Schilmilleretal.,2010)andcorrelatewellwiththe large amount of rutin found in trichomes of LA4024, but also for the presence of various methylatedmyricetinderivativesinbothspecies(Schmidtetal.,2011;Kimetal.,2014). Lipidmetabolism.InLA1777,25%(p=0.05)ofalltranscriptsand56%(p=0.01)ofallproteins detectedinMapManbin11weresignificantlyupregulatedinGTs.InLA4024,21%(p=0.05) ofalltranscriptsand49%(p=0.01)ofallproteinsdetectedinMapManbin11weresignificantly upregulatedinGTs.Furthermore,enrichmentanalysisshowedamarkedcontributionofgenes encodinglongfattyacidmodificationandlipiddegradationspecifictotheGTsofbothspecies (SupplementalDataset6,SupplementalDataset5).Lipidformationinplantsnormallytakes placeintheplastids.Therefore,weexpectedtofindtranscriptsfortheplastidicacetyl-CoA carboxylaseandmalonyl-CoAacylcarrierproteintransacylase,theinitiatingenzymesoffatty acidbiosynthesis,bothofwhicharestronglyupregulated.However,differentsubclustersof 13 the acetyl-CoA carboxylase protein complex showed only up to two-fold higher levels of transcript(e.g.,Solyc12g056940)inbothspecies.Thetransacylasewasexpressedatrelatively lowlevelsinbothspeciesanddidnotshowasignificantdifferencebetweentrichomesand leaves(Solyc01g006980).Afterplastidicbiosynthesisoffattyacidswithchainlengthsofupto C16-C18, extension to longer fatty acids requires their export out of the plastid to the endoplasmicreticulum(Samuelsetal.,2008;KunstandSamuels,2009).Theextensionoffatty acids from long (C16, C18) to very long chains is catalyzed by β-ketoacyl-CoA synthase, βketoacyl-CoAreductase,β-hydroxyacyl-CoAdehydratase,andenoyl-CoAreductase(Kunstand Samuels, 2009). Inspection of highly abundant but differentially expressed genes revealed strongupregulationoffattyacidelongasesandacyl-CoAligasesinGTs(e.g.,Solyc07g043630, Solyc03g031940, Solyc09g083050, and Solyc08g067410; Supplemental Dataset 5). Furthermore, in agreement with the accumulation of polyunsaturated fatty acids in GTs in bothspecies,massiveexpressionwasalsoobservedforseveraltrichome-specificdesaturases. Solyc11g008680 (log2-fold change of 4.1 in LA1777; log2-fold change of 0.53 in LA4024), Solyc01g009960(log2-foldchangeof3.7inLA1777;log2-foldchangeof2.83inLA4024)and Solyc06g059710(log2-foldchangeof1.5inLA1777;log2-foldchangeof4.79inLA4024)encode acyl-carrier protein desaturases. Solyc01g006430 (log2-fold change of 1.31 in LA1777; log2foldchangeof1.87inLA4024)encodesadesaturaseoftheendoplasmicreticulumandisalso upregulatedinGTsofbothspecies.Highexpressionoftheselipidbiosynthesisgenesisingood agreementwiththemeasurementoflargeamountsofpolyunsaturatedC18(inLA4024)and C20(inLA1777)fattyacids(seeabove). VariousROSdetoxificationsystemsareover-expressedinGTs Photosynthetic oxygenesis, the activity of oxidoreductases and high metabolic activity in generalresultintheformationofreactiveoxygenspecies(ROS)suchassingletoxygen.ROS staininginLA1777indicatedmuchstrongerROSformationinGTscomparedwithleafmatter (Supplemental Figure 10). Enzymes that are involved in the detoxification of ROS include superoxidedismutase,catalases,andperoxidasesfortheoxidationofglutathione,ascorbate, orlipids.Veryhighlevelsofsuperoxidedismutasegeneexpressioncouldbedetectedinthe GTs of both species, with, e.g., Solyc01g067740 belonging to the top 15 most abundant 14 enzymesinthetrichomesofbothspecieswithproteinlevelsbeing31-fold(LA1777)and39fold(LA4024)higherthanintheleaves(SupplementalDataset5). The high levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids and of oxylipins derived thereof (see above) suggestedthatthesecouldplayaroleinthequenchingofROS,ashasbeenshowninother plantsystems(Schmid-Siegertetal.,2016).Lipoxygenasesrepresentanessentialcomponent ofthisdetoxificationpathway,sincetheyconsumeH2O2andgeneratelipidperoxidesthatcan be further metabolized. The cumulative gene expression of all 21 lipoxygenases was comparable between leaves and trichomes in both species. Yet, closer inspection of the subcellularlocalizationshowedmuchhighertranscriptandproteinlevelsformembersofthe cytosolicLOX1/LOX5familywith9S-lipoxygenaseactivity.ThehighestlevelswerefoundinGTs of LA1777 (Supplemental Figure 11). By contrast, homologs of the LOX2/LOX3 family in Arabidopsisthalianawith13S-lipoxygenaseactivity,whicharelocalizedintheplastids,were enriched in leaves with one exception (Solyc01g006540). This gene appeared to also be trichome-specificinLA4024andshowedoneofthehighestproteinabundancesmeasuredof all (Supplemental Figure 11D). These expression results were confirmed by RT-qPCR (SupplementalTable1). Furthermore, Solyc07g049690, encoding the fatty acid hydroperoxide lyase, was highly expressedintrichomesofLA1777andLA4024withtranscriptlevelsbeingsixtimesandthree times higher and protein abundances being 50 and 150 times higher than in leaves (Supplemental Dataset 5). This finding supports the contribution of lipid oxidation as one important mechanism involved in ROS detoxification. Whereas in leaves expression of hydroperoxide lyase is inducible, in GTs it appears to be constitutively expressed, since no extraenvironmentalstresswasappliedduringourexperiments.Altogether,theseresultsare inagreementwiththemeasurementsof9S-hydroxy-10E,12Z-octadecadienoicacid(9-HODE) inLA1777and13S-hydroxy-9Z,11E-octadecadienoicacid(13-HODE)inLA4024,respectively. Lipid hydroperoxides can be recycled by glutathione peroxidases via the oxidation of glutathione(GSH)toglutathionedisulfide(GSSG).Inbothspecies,mostgenesencodingGSH peroxidases showed higher transcript levels and higher cumulative protein abundances in trichomes than in leaves and were significantly enriched in the GT protein of both species (Supplemental Figure 12, Supplemental Dataset 6). The higher GSSG/GSH oxidation state 15 mentionedaboveisfurthercorroboratedbythehighexpressioninGTsofcysteinesynthase, which is required for GSH replenishment. Five out of six cysteine synthase-coding genes showedhigherexpressionintrichomesofbothtomatolines.Particularly,Solyc01g097940, whichdominatedtheexpressionofthisenzymefamily,showed15-17-foldhighertranscript levelsascomparedtothecorrespondingleaves(SupplementalDataset5). In contrast to GSH peroxidases, other enzyme families contributing to the cell redox homeostasisdidnotshowamajorupregulationinGTs(SupplementalFigure12).Forinstance, glutaredoxins showed similar transcript levels in GTs and leaves of both species, with one isoform-encoding gene (Solyc09g074570) being outstandingly high in the leaves (SupplementalDataset5).Amongthethioredoxins,withoneexception(Solyc05g018700with transcript levels being 4-5 higher in GTs and moderately abundant protein present only in GTs), similar or lower transcript levels were detected in GTs relative to the leaves of both species (e.g., Solyc07g063190 or Solyc04g081970). With one exception (Solyc04g082460), catalase-codingtranscriptswerecomparableorhigherintomatoleavesascomparedtoGTs (SupplementalDataset5).SimilarorlowertranscriptandproteinlevelsinGTscomparedto leaves in both species were found also for the most abundant ascorbate peroxidases (i.e., Solyc06g005160);thustheglutathione-ascorbatecycleappearstoequallycontributetoH2O2 removal in GTs and leaves despite the depletion observed for ascorbate in trichomes of LA4024 (Supplemental Dataset 3). Other peroxidases included polyphenol oxidases, which showed GT-specific expression in LA4024 (Solyc08g074620, Solyc02g078650, Supplemental Dataset5). Altogether,ourresultsbasedonmetabolomics,transcriptomicsandproteomics,indicatethat specific ROS-detoxification pathways show increased activity in GTs. In particular, the oxidation of unsaturated lipids and glutathione-based detoxification of reactive peroxides appeartoplayimportantroles. 16 ThemetabolismofGTsisdirectedtowardsthesupplyofprecursorsandcofactorsforthe majormetabolitepathways The abundant biosynthesis of secondary metabolites by GTs requires the supply of carbon fromprecursorsaswellastheprovisionoflargequantitiesofATPandNAD(P)H.Sincethe major metabolites in GTs are terpenoids produced from the MEP (plastidic) and the mevalonate (cytosolic) pathways, it was thus expected that processes delivering triose phosphates and pyruvic acid (for the MEP pathway) or acetyl CoA (for the mevalonate pathway)areupregulatedinGTsoftomato. Supply of acetyl CoA in the cytosol. Upon glycolysis, acetyl CoA is produced in the mitochondria. Acetyl CoA, however, cannot be transported across the mitochondrial membrane. The supply of acetyl CoA in the cytosol can be achieved via the citrate shuttle (Oliver et al., 2009; Xing et al., 2014). Citrate is transported from the mitochondria or the peroxisomes into the cytosol and cleavage of citrate by the cytosolic ATP-citrate lyase produces oxaloacetate and acetyl CoA. Microarray expression data showed that citrate synthases (CS; Solyc01g073740 - mitochondrial, Solyc12g011000 - peroxisomal) were moderately,butsignificantly(p<0.05witht-teststatistics)upregulatedinthetrichomesof bothspecies(SupplementalDataset5)andupto23-foldhigherproteinlevelswerefoundin GTs relative to the corresponding leaves (Supplemental Dataset 5). Genes encoding ATPcitrate-lyasesshowedhighertranscriptlevelsinLA1777trichomesandhighercorresponding proteinlevelsinGTsrelativetoleafmatter,supportingcitrateexportfrommitochondriato thecytosolinGTs(Figure9,SupplementalDataset5).Despitethelargerpoolsizeofcitrate comparedtoisocitrate,isotopicpatternsofcitrateafter24hU13C-glucoselabelingshoweda muchhigherincorporationof13Cintocitratethanwasobservedforisocitrate(Supplemental Figure13).InaccordancewiththesmallercitratepoolsizeinGTsversusinleaves(p<0.05 witht-teststatistics),the 13CenrichmentincitratewasmoreintenseinGTsthaninleaves. Thus,supportingthetranscriptomics/proteomicsdata,labelingindicatesthatcitrateislargely exported from mitochondria rather than turned into isocitrate via mitochondrial TCA enzymes.Moreover,incontrasttoCS,mostotherTCAenzymesshowedcomparableoronly slightlyincreasedtranscriptandproteinlevels(<3-fold)fortrichomesversusleavesofthe correspondingline(SupplementalDataset5).OurdatathereforesupportthefactthatinGTs thecitrate-malate-pyruvateshuttleisusedtosupplyacetylCoAinthecytosol,neededtofuel 17 fattyacidelongation,thebiosynthesisofisoprenyldiphosphatesviathemevalonatepathway or other key metabolites produced in the cytosol. Higher transcript and protein levels for cytosolic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK), cytosolic pyruvate kinase (cPK), cytosolic malic enzyme (cME), and cytosolic and mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase (cPDH, mPDH) support that carbon withdrawn from the TCA cycle by the ATP-citrate lyase complex is replenished by malate and pyruvate (Figure 9, Supplemental Dataset 5, Supplemental Table 1). Upregulated transcripts and elevated protein levels of phosphoenolpyruvatecarboxylase(PEPC)andPEPCKinGTsindicatethatanapleroticroutes to produce oxaloacetate may additionally facilitate the production of cytosolic acetyl-CoA (Tcherkez et al., 2011). For PEPCK, a bidirectional enzyme, preferred carboxylation was demonstrated in C4 plants for high physiological ATP/ADP ratios (Chen et al., 2002). On average,theATP/ADPratio(basedonpeakarea)was1.5xand2.7xhigherinGTsofLA1777 andLA4024,respectively,ascomparedtothecorrespondingleaves(SupplementalDataset3). This,andincreasedproteinlevelsofPEPCinGTsversusleavesinbothspecies,alsoinfersthat CO2isincorporatedintooxoaloacetate. Supplyofpyruvateandglyceraldehyde-3-phosphateintheplastids.Thelargequantitiesof plastidicterpenoidsproducedinGTsofbothtomatospecies(monoterpenoidsforLA4024and sesquiterpenoidsforLA1777),indicatethatfluxthroughtheMEPpathwayisimportant.This is supported by high transcript and protein levels of MEP pathway enzymes in GTs (Supplemental Figure 9, Supplemental Dataset 5, Supplemental Table 2). Such high MEP pathwayfluxwouldrequireanappropriatesupplyofitsprecursors,namelyglyceraldehyde3-phosphate(GAP)andpyruvate(PYR).PlastidicPYRcanbeproducedviaplastidicglycolysis, byplastidicisoformsofmalicenzymeorimportedfromthecytosol(Oliveretal.,2009;Weber andBrautigam,2013;Eisenhutetal.,2015;Shtaidaetal.,2015).GAPintheplastidscanbe supplied by the non-oxidative pentose phosphate pathway, the CBB cycle, by plastidic glycolysisorbytranslocationfromthecytosol(Flüggeetal.,2011). Plastidicandcytosolicglycolysis.Sincethesubcellularlocalizationofcytosolicandplastidic poolsofglycolyticmetabolitescannotbeunambiguouslyassignedbymetabolomics,itisnot possibletoconcludewhetherplastidicorcytosolicglycolysissuppliesthecarbonforGAPor PYRinGTsbasedonmetabolomicsdata.Thus,transcriptomicsandproteomicsresultswere mined to address this question. Two genes encoding plastidic pyruvate kinases (pPK) 18 (Solyc01g106780 (LA1777: log2-fold change 3.15; LA4024: log2-fold change 1.84) and Solyc03g007810 (LA1777: log2-fold change 1.80; LA4024: log2-fold change 2.0) show significantlyincreasedexpressionintrichomesaswellasageneencodingaplastidicenolase (Solyc03g114500), although in this case differential expression is more pronounced for LA1777(log2-foldchange2.3)thanforLA4024(log2-foldchange0.4)(SupplementalFigure14, Supplemental Dataset 5, Supplemental Table 1) in particular at the protein level (log2-fold change3.38inLA1777;nosignificantchangeinLA4024).Inbothspecies,hightranscriptlevels and protein abundances of several isoforms of fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (FBA) were predicted to be plastidic. Those with the highest expression levels were leaf-specific (e.g., Solyc02g062340) and are associated with aldolase activity in the CBB cycle. However, one plastidic FBA (Solyc05g008600) and two cytosolic FBAs (Solyc09g009260, Solyc10g083570) showedhighertranscriptandproteinlevelsintrichomesthaninleaveswithabsolutevalues beinghighinGTsofbothspecies(Figure14,SupplementalDataset5).Additionally,hexose breakdown in GTs appears to proceed via cytosolic diphosphate-dependent phosphofructokinases,whichshowedhigherexpressioninGTsascomparedtoleaves(e.g., Solyc04g082880, Solyc12g095760, Solyc02g081160, Supplemental Figure 14, Supplemental Dataset5).Thus,inGTs,provisionoftriosephosphatesseemstobeassistedviaacombination of cytosolic and plastidic glycolysis. This implies the transport of various sugar and triose phosphatesbetweenthecytosolandtheplastids. Otherroutes.Alternatively,pyruvatecanbeproducedviadecarboxylationofmalatebythe plastidic NADP-dependent malic enzyme (pNADP-ME). Genes encoding pNADP-ME, particularly Solyc12g044600, were most strongly expressed in GTs of LA1777 (Log2-fold change=1.2)andLA4024(Log2-foldchange=0.3)andalsoexhibitedhigherproteinlevelsinGTs versus leaves but only in LA1777 (Log2-fold change=3.94) (Supplemental Dataset 5). Transketolase,aGAP-producingenzymeinvolvedinthenon-oxidativebranchofthepentose phosphate pathway showed high expression of two plastidic isoforms (Solyc10g018300, Solyc05g050970, Supplemental Dataset 5) of which the latter showed increased transcript levelsandproteinabundanceinGTsofbothspeciesascomparedtothecorrespondingleaves. Contributionoftheplastidicoxidativepentosephosphatepathway.Intheoxidativepentose phosphate pathway glucose-6-phosphate is converted to a pentose phosphate with the release of NADPH. One plastidic isoform of glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase 19 (Solyc05g015950)showedelevatedtranscriptlevelsinGTs(Log2-foldchange=1.7inLA1777, 1.09 in LA4024; Supplemental Dataset 5), which was also confirmed by RT-qPCR (SupplementalTable1)andproteinlevelsweremarkedlyelevated inGTsversusleavesbut only in LA1777 (Log2-fold change=3.89, Supplemental Dataset 5). Furthermore, Solyc12g056120 which encodes a plastidic 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase shows elevatedtranscriptandremarkablyhighproteinlevelsintrichomes(Log2-foldchange=2.01in LA1777,2.13inLA4024; SupplementalDataset5-SI).Highactivityoftheoxidativepentose phosphate pathway would serve a dual function: to supply NADPH as well as ribulose-5phosphateforthereplenishmentofRU-1,5-BPintheCBBcycle. Transport. The compartmentalization of metabolism implies exchange between compartments,whichplayanessentialroleinensuringappropriatesupplyofprecursorsfor compartment-specificmetabolicpathways.Particularlyrelevantarethetransportofsugar, sugar-phosphates,triose-phosphatesandcarboxylicacidstoandfromthechloroplasts.The moststronglyexpressedisoformoftheglucose-6-phosphatetranslocator(Solyc07g064270)is slightly over-expressed in trichomes (log2-fold change = 1.32 in LA1777; 0.59 in LA4024), whereas the most strongly expressed isoform of the phosphoenolpyruvate translocator (Solyc03g112870) shows no differential expression between leaves and trichomes in both species.TriosephosphatetranslocatorSolyc10g008980showedhightranscriptlevelsinGTs ofbothtomatolineseventhoughtheexpressionlevelwasthreetimeshigherintheleaves thaninthetrichomes(log2-foldchange=1.27inLA1777;1.53inLA4024).Triosephosphate translocationinleavesisutilizedtoshuttletriosephosphatesproducedbytheCBBcyclefrom thechloroplaststothecytosol(LudewigandFlügge,2013).However,asglycolyticbreakdown ofhexoseinthecytosolofGTsisindicatedbyhighexpressionofgenesofthetoppartofthe glycolysis pathway, reverse transport of triose phosphate from the cytosol to the plastids wouldalsobeplausible.Ashexosephosphateistranslocatedfromthecytosolintotheplastids ofGTs,itcanbeconvertedtoGAPviaplastidicglycolysisortheplastidicpentosephosphate pathway. Among the putative transmembrane transporters for pyruvate, mitochondrial Solyc10g051120, encoding a putative mitochondrial isoform, was particularly strongly overexpressedinGTs,2.6-foldinLA1777(q-value=1.42x10-6)and24-foldinLA4024(q-value =1.06x10-11),supportingthefactthatpyruvateisconvertedtoacetyl-CoAandcitrateinthe 20 mitochondria,thelatterbeingthenexportedtothecytosoltobeconvertedtoacetyl-CoAby ATP-citratelyase(seeabove). The tomato genome contains several homologs of the bile acid sodium symporter (BASS) family.InArabidopsisthaliana,theBASS2protein(At2g26900)wasshowntofunctionasa plastidial pyruvate sodium-dependent transporter (Furumoto et al., 2011). A phylogenetic analysis of the BASS homologs from Arabidopsis and tomato (Supplemental Figure 15; Supplemental Dataset 8) indicates a strong conservation of the respective BASS proteins betweenthespecies,ratherthanwithinspecies.Thissuggeststhattherespectivefunctions of the BASS proteins between these two species are well conserved. The BASS2 putative ortholog of tomato (Solyc05g017950) shows comparable expression levels in leaves and trichomes in both species, indicating that pyruvate import via BASS2 is not induced in trichomes compared to leaves. By contrast, in LA1777, Solyc08g007590 (BASS6) is overexpressed in trichomes (Log2-fold change=2.05). Arabidopsis has two putative orthologs of Solyc08g007590,BASS5andBASS6,althoughithasahigherpercentageofsequenceidentity withBASS6thanwithBASS5.Interestingly,BASS5(At4g12030)isinvolvedinthetransportof methionine-derived alpha-keto acids required for the biosynthesis of the corresponding glucosinolates(Gigolashvilietal.,2009),butthefunctionofBASS6isunknown.Sincetomato isnotknowntoproduceglucosinolates,Solyc08g007590couldbeinvolvedintheimportof other carboxylic acids with a functional group in the alpha position, for example C4dicarboxylicacidssuchasmalateoroxaloacetate.InLA4024,Solyc09g055940(putativeBASS3 ortholog)isoverexpressedintrichomes(Log2-foldchange=1.5;p=0.05).However,thefunction ofBASS3isunknown.ItssimilaritytoBASS5/6couldsuggestitisalsoinvolvedinthetransport ofcarboxylicacidswithafunctionalgroupinthealphaposition.Inaddition,ahomologofthe Arabidopsisdicarboxylicacidtransporter(DIT1),Solyc11g065830,showsslightoverexpression intrichomesofLA1777(Log2-foldchange=0.69)butalowerexpressionintrichomesofLA4024 (Log2-foldchange=2.19). Supply of ATP and reducing power. As for the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway, transcriptlevelsofgenesandproteinsencodingNADPH-producingenzymefamiliesotherthan PSIwereincreasedinGTsascomparedtoleaftissue(SupplementalFigure16).Thus,intomato GTs,inadditiontoNADPHproductionviaphotosynthesis,thecentralcarbonmetabolismis directedintotheproductionofthereducingcofactorNADPH.Onaverage,theexpressionof 21 genes in the MapMan ontology group 1.1.4 PS.lightreaction.ATP synthase resulted in transcriptlevelsbeing3.4-fold(LA1777)and3.1-fold(LA14024)higherinleavesthaninthe correspondingGTs.Ontheotherhand,mitochondrialATPasetranscripts(MapMangroup9.9 mitochondrial electron transport/ATP synthesis.F1-ATPase) were comparable (0.8-fold (LA1777)and0.8-fold(LA4024))betweenleavesandGTsofbothspecies.Thus,photosynthetic ATPandNADPHproductionintomatoGTsisbasedonpronouncedexpressionlevelsofboth photosystems(Figure7).However,itscontributiontotheenergetichomeostasisappearsto belowerthaninleaves. Discussion Toidentifywhichmetabolicroutesdeliverenergy,reductionequivalentsandcarbonintomato GT,weusedamulti-omicsapproachand13C-labelingexperiments.Wetookadvantageofthe recentsequencingofthetomatogenomeforacomprehensivesurveyofgeneandprotein expression.ThehighdegreeofsequencesimilaritybetweenLA4024andLA1777allowedus to use a single microarray that was designed to hybridize to the RNA of both species. By comparing trichome samples (dominated by type VI trichomes) with nearly trichome-free leavesintwotomatospecies,weidentifiedmetabolicprocessesthatdrivethehighproduction ofsecondarymetabolitesinthistypeofGT.AsthesecondarymetabolismintypeVIGTsof LA1777andLA4024widelyoverlaps,weonlybrieflydescribedprocessesthatarespecificto eitherofthelineswhenevertheycontributedtotheformationofhighlyabundantsecondary metabolites.Themainaim,however,wastoemphasizeregulatoryprinciplesthatarecommon tobothtomatomodels. Trichome-specificcentralcarbonmetabolismdespitedifferentsecondarymetabolites Metabolomicsdataofsecondarymetabolitesgenerallyconfirmsearlierworks(Besseretal., 2009;Schilmilleretal.,2010;Ghoshetal.,2014).InLA1777trichomes,themetaboliteprofile isdominatedbyshortbranchedchainacylsugarswithfattyacidchainlengthsbetweenC2C12,flavonoids,freelong-chainfattyacidsandsesquiterpenecarboxylicacids.InLA4024,the flavanol conjugates dominated the metabolic profile in LC/MS. Beyond these confirmative measurements,tothebestofourknowledge,acomprehensiveanalysisofthecentralcarbon and energy metabolism of GT has not been reported to date. PCA analysis of hydrophilic 22 metabolomesshowedthatGTsofLA1777andLA4024havemoreincommonwitheachother than with leaves from the same species. This indicates that GTs share unique metabolic processesthatrelatetotheirhighmetabolicactivitydespitethedifferentmetabolitesthey produce. The combination of these data with transcriptomics, proteomics and 13C-labeling dataallowedustoextractthesalientfeaturesofthesemetaboliccellfactories,whichwillbe discussedbelow,andtointegratethemintoametabolicmodel. SucroseisamajorcarbonsourceforGTs Severalargumentssupportthefactthatsucroseisthemajorcarbonsource.Firstly,thepool size of sucrose in the leaves is about twice as large as that of trichomes, implying sucrose provisionfromtheleavesviaaconcentrationgradient(Figure8).Secondly,thepatternsof labeledformsofsucroseweresimilarfortrichomesandleafmatter,especiallyatlatertime points. Thirdly, the percentage of labeled isotopologs in GT lagged behind the enrichment observed in leaves during earlier stages. Signals of labeled glucose were low in leaf and trichomes, implying a rapid conversion of glucose into sucrose in the leaf. Instead, incorporationoflabelwasfoundinsucroseinall12positionswiththen+12,n+11,n+10and n+6isotopologsdominatingthesignalafter 13C-labelingwith 13C-CO2andthen+6andn+12 13 C- isotopologs dominating the signal after U13C-glucose labeling (Figure 8, Supplemental Figure8).Inaddition,sucrose-degradingenzymeswereoverexpressedintrichomesinalmost all compartments as shown in Figure 5 for cell wall invertases, cytosolic invertases and cytosolicsucrosesynthase.Inparallel,invertaseinhibitorswerestronglyreducedintrichomes, supportingstrongerdegradationofsucroseintheapoplasm.Sucrosedecompositioninnonphotosynthetic GTs of other plant families displayed relatively high enrichment in EST libraries, for instance in peltate trichomes of basil (Gang et al., 2001). From this, it was proposedthatcarbonofabundantphenylpropenesoriginatesfromsucroseimportedfrom theunderlyingleaves(Gangetal.,2001).Inspearmint(Menthaspicata),severaltranscripts encodingenzymesforsucrosecatabolismwereexpressedmoreinnon-photosyntheticpeltate GTsthanintrichome-freeleafmatter(Jinetal.,2014).Intobacco(Nicotianatabacum),which liketomatohasphotosyntheticglandulartrichomes,highRuBisCOactivitywasindicatedby representationinESTlibrariesandexpressionlevelsmeasuredbyRT-qPCR(Cuietal.,2011). Besides RuBisCO, carbohydrate metabolism represented more than 10% of all proteins definedbythegeneontology(GO)inatrichome-specificcDNAlibraryoftobaccotrichomes. 23 BecauseGTsoftomatoalsoexpressphotosynthesisgenes(forbothphotosystemsandcarbon fixation) at high levels, the fact that sucrose constitutes a major carbon source raises the questionofthecontributionofphotosynthesistoCsupplyintrichomes. Uncouplinglightphotosynthesisfromthedarkreactions In GTs, genes encoding proteins of both photosystems were expressed at roughly half the valuesobservedforleavesbuthadstillthemostabundanttranscriptsinGTs,implyingthat both photosystems are highly active in GTs in delivering ATP, NADPH and O2. By contrast, genesfortheCBBcycleandphotorespirationwere4to5timeslowerintrichomescompared to leaves. This indicates that there is an uncoupling of gene expression between light photosynthesisandcarbonfixationmediatedbytheCBBcycleinGTs.Consistentwiththis, genesforstarchbiosynthesisanddegradationarealsodown-regulatedinGTs,showingthat carbonthatisincorporatedinGTsisnotstoredasstarch.TheloweractivityoftheCBBcycle inGTswasconfirmedbyour13Clabelingexperiments,whichindicatedthatsomeCO2isfixed viatheRuBisCOcomplex,butalargepartofthe13C-labelwasacquiredindirectlyaftersupply andbreakdownofsucroseandnotdirectlyfromtheatmosphere.ThatlittleatmosphericCO2 isfixedinGTsisfurthercorroboratedbythepresenceofanenvelope(cellwallandcuticle), which is even thicker than that of epidermal cells and likely to significantly restrict gas exchange(Figure1). Thehighmetabolicactivityoftheglandularcellsrequireshighlevelsofchemicalenergyand reducingpower.Forexample,theplastidicMEPpathwayrequires1xATP,1xCTPand2x NADPHandthecytosolicmevalonatepathwayrequires3xATPand2xNADPHtogenerate oneC5body.Onecanthereforeassumethattheenergyandreducingpowerresultingfrom theactivityofthephotosystemsinGTssupportthishighmetabolicactivity.Theuncouplingof lightphotosynthesisfromthedarkreactionsraisestheissueofthefunctionoftheCBBcycle inGTs.DespitethelowerexpressionofCBBcyclegenesinGTscomparedtotheleaf,their expressionisfarfromnegligible.ThemoststronglyexpressedRuBisCOsmallsubunitisoform (Solyc02g085950)stillranksamongthetop350mosthighlyexpressedgenesinGTsofLA1777 andLA4024.CO2producedinternallyinthetrichomesispotentiallyrecycledviatheactivityof RuBisCO without a full CBB cycle, as previously shown in developing green Brassica seeds (Schwender et al., 2004). In our 13C-U-glucose labeling experiments, RU-1,5-BP and 3-PGA 24 display stronger 13C enrichment in trichomes than in leaves, particularly with heavier isotoplogs(e.g.,n+4andn+5forRU-1,5-BP,andn+3for3-PGA)(Figure8andSupplemental Figure8).ThisimpliesthatintrichomestheCBBcycleisreplenishedviasucrosebreakdown products. This could be accomplished through the supply of C5 units from the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway or through glycolytic formation of triose phosphates, both of whichareoverexpressedintrichomes. ElevatedlipidmetabolismandlipidoxidationarecommonfeaturesinGT–Hydroperoxide lyaseiscoexpressedwithgenesoftheMEPpathway Tightlyconnectedtoactivephotosystemsandtheactivityofoxidoreductasesistheformation ofreactiveoxygenspecies(ROS),thepresenceofwhichwassubstantiatedbyROSstaining experiments(SupplementalFigure10).Ourdata(bothmetaboliteandgeneexpression)point totheactivationofmechanismsthatprovideincreasedprotectionagainstoxidativestressin GTs. Firstly, we see high levels of unsaturated fatty acids (C20:4 in LA1777 and C18:3 in LA4024) and also high levels of oxidized derivatives of these PUFAs. Next, we see high expression of genes encoding lipoxygenases and hydroperoxide lyase, indicating lipid peroxidation activity. Interestingly, hydroperoxide lyase was shown to be induced by high levels of 2-C-Methyl-D-erythritol-2,4-cyclopyrophosphate (MEcPP) via retrograde signaling from plastid to nucleus (Xiao et al., 2012). Moreover, abiotic stresses robustly modulated MEcPP levels and thus induced hydroperoxide lyase expression. As in hydroxy-methylbutenyl-diphosphate-synthase(HDS,EC1.17.7.1)mutantlinesofA.thaliana,highlevelsof MEcPPalsocoincidedwithhighhydroperoxidelyasetranscriptioninGTs.However,whether highhydroperoxidelyaseexpressioninGTsistheresultofhighMEcPPlevelsremainstobe demonstrated. The strong upregulation of GSH peroxidase and other peroxidases was also observed in tomato GTs contributing to the detoxification of ROS. The induction of similar processesthatcopewithROShasalsobeenobservedintrichomesfromotherspecies.For example,strongupregulationoflipidandglutathionemetabolismwasshowninArtemisiaand minttrichomes(Soetaertetal.,2013;Jinetal.,2014).Soetaertetal.alsoshowedthat—as intomato—non-plastidicelongasesanddesaturasesaswellasglutathionemetabolismwere strongly elevated in GTs of Artemisia annua. Thus, detoxification of ROS by high levels of peroxidasesandlipoxygenationseemtobeatrichome-specificfeature. 25 IncreasedsupplyofprecursorsforsecondarymetabolitepathwaysinGTs Tomato GTs produce large quantities of terpenoids both from the cytosolic MEV and the plastidicMEPpathways.Thereforeitistobeexpectedthatthemetabolitesthatareatthe originofthesepathwaysshouldalsobesuppliedinadequateamounts.Theprecursorofthe MEV pathway is acetyl-CoA. Our data support a strong induction of the citrate-malatepyruvateshuttlesystem,whichallowsthesynthesisofacetylCoAinthecytosol.Akeyelement of this shuttle is the cytosolic ATP-citrate lyase, which cleaves citrate exported from the mitochondria to acetyl-CoA and oxalo-acetate. ATP-citrate lyase is strongly enriched in trichomes(Figure9),asareanumberofenzymestypicallyassociatedwiththisshuttlesystem. Recently,Xingetal.highlightedthecentralroleofATP-citrate-lyaseintheproductionofcutin andacetyl-CoA-derivedpolyhydroxybutyrateintransgenicA.thaliana(Xingetal.,2014).Thus the overexpression ATP-citrate lyase together with a number of enzymes involved in this process constitutes a potential engineering target for increasing flux through the MEV pathway. The precursors of the MEP pathway are pyruvate (PYR) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (GAP).Bothareintermediatesofglycolysis,whichcantakeplaceeitherinthecytosolorinthe plastids. Several genes encoding plastidic isoforms of enzymes of the lower part of the glycolysispathway,suchaspyruvatekinaseandenolase,wereoverexpressedinGTs.Since some enzymes of glycolysis are also shared by the CBB cycle, which is overall significantly down-regulatedinGTs,itisofinteresttoseehowspecificisoformsareexpressedinGTs.Thus, Solyc05g008600,whichencodesapredictedplastidicfructose-bisphosphatealdolase(FBA),is overexpressedintrichomesandshowstheoppositetrendasothergenesencodingplastidic FBAs.ThereisthereforeastrongindicationthatplastidicglycolysisisfullyexpressedinGTs. MEP pathway precursors could also be provided by other means, for example via the CBB cycle,whichalthoughdownregulatedintrichomes,isstillactiveandcansupplyGAP.Further, wealsonotetheincreasedexpressionofglucose-6-phosphateandtriosephosphateplastidic transportersinGTs,indicatingthatG6Pandtriosephosphatesrepresentimportantcarbon supplies to the chloroplasts of GTs. Another potential source of precursors for the MEP pathway comes from C4 dicarboxylic acids. Particularly in LA1777, we noted a significant overexpression of a plastidic isoform of NADP-dependent malic enzyme (NADP-ME, Solyc12g044600).MEconvertsmalatetopyruvate,therebyreleasingCO2andNADPH.High 26 levels of malate in the plastids would require transport of malate from the cytosol to the plastids. Of the characterized dicarboxylic acid transporters, only one (Solyc11g065830) showedmoderatelyincreasedexpressionlevelsintrichomes,butseveralgenesannotatedas encodingmitochondrialcarrierproteins(e.g.Solyc05g052640),whichhavehomologytoyeast mitochondrialdicarboxylicacidtransporters,showstrongexpressioninGT.Theexactfunction ofthesetransportersinplantsisnotknown,anditistemptingtospeculatethattheymight beinvolvedintheimportofdicarboxylicacidsintotheplastidsinthecontextofcellswithlow CBBactivity.Alsoofinterest,istheoverexpressionofgenescodingfortransportersofthe BASSfamily,Solyc08g007590inLA1777andSolyc09g055940inLA4024,whichareputative orthologsofBASS6andBASS3,respectively.ThefunctionofthesetransportersinArabidopsis isnotyetknown,butBASS5,whichiscloselyrelatedtoBASS6,isinvolvedinthetransportof methionine-deriveda-ketoacids,suggestingBASS6andBASS3arealsopotentialcandidates forthetransportofC4-dicarboxylicacids,suchasmalate.InconnectiontoC4metabolism, high level expression of PEPC in LA1777 trichomes and of PEPCK in the trichomes of both specieswereobserved.AlthoughPEPCiswellestablishedasaCO2fixatingenzyme,PEPCKis typicallyregardedasadecarboxylatingenzyme.However,PEPCKisabidirectionalenzymeand preferredcarboxylationwasdemonstratedinC4plantsforhighphysiologicalATP/ADPratios (Chenetal.,2002),whichisthecaseintomatoGTs.Thus,highexpressionofPEPCandPEPCK could indicate a transient CO2 fixation in the form of C4 dicarboxylic acids, which when transported to the plastids would be further converted to pyruvate. CO2 released by this reactioncouldthenberecycledbyRuBisCo,therebyincreasingthecarbonefficiencyofthe glandularcells.Thusitappearsthatthesupplyofpyruvateandglyceraldehyde-3-phosphate fortheMEPpathwayissupportedbyseveralprocessesinvolvingplastidsandthecytosol.GTs ofLA1777andLA4024produceterpenesthataresynthesizedinthecytosol(sesquiterpenes in LA4024 and LA1777) and in plastids (monoterpenes in LA4024 and sesquiterpenes in LA1777).ThisraisesthequestionofthecrosstalkbetweentheMEVandMEPpathwaysinGTs, aphenomenonthathasbeenobservedpreviouslyinseveralplantsystems(Dudarevaetal., 2005;LipkoandSwiezewska,2016).Ourtranscriptomicsandproteomicsdata(Supplemental Figure9)indicatethatboththeMEVandMEPpathwaysarehighlyactiveinGTs,particularly inLA1777,inagreementwiththehigherterpeneproductivityinthisspecies.Fromthis,itcan beconcludedthateachoftheisoprenoidprecursorpathwayslikelysuppliesprecursorsfor 27 theterpenesthatareproducedintheirrespectivecompartment.However,itisnotpossible toexcludethetransferofprecursorsfromonecompartmenttotheotherwiththeavailable data. This would require labeling with, for example, deuterated deoxyxylulose or mevalonolactone. ThecomparisonbetweenLA4024andLA1777indicatesmanysimilaritiesinGTsbutalsosome differences.SomenotablefeaturesareforexamplethehigherexpressionofgenesintheMEP pathway,oftheplastidicglycolysis(enolaseandpyruvatekinase)ortheplastidicNADP-malic enzymeinLA1777,whichlikelycontributetoahigherfluxintheplastidicisoprenoidpathway inthatspecies.ThisisconsistentwiththesignificantlyhigherproductivityofGTsinLA1777 (97timesmoreterpenoidsproducedthaninLA4024). Amodelforglandulartrichomemetabolicefficiency Integratingtheseobservations,weproposeamodelonhowprimarymetabolismintomato typeVIGTsisorganizedtosupplyadequateamountsofprecursorsforthemajormetabolic output,whichconsistsessentiallyofterpenoidsinLA1777(Figure10).Sucroseimportedfrom the leaves constitutes the major carbon source. The light-dependent reactions of photosynthesissupplyenergyandreducingpowerforthemetabolicactivity,althoughamajor differencewithmesophyllcellsisthattheenergyandreducingpowerarenotusedprimarily forcarbonfixationviatheCBBcycle,butforthesecondarymetabolitepathways,principally terpenoidandlipidbiosynthesis.ApossiblecontributionoftheCBBcycleisre-fixationofCO2 generated by the metabolic activity, thereby increasing the carbon efficiency. The photosyntheticactivitygeneratesROS,whicharedealtwithbyoxidationofPUFAsandother anti-oxidantmechanismssuchassuperoxidedismutaseorglutathioneperoxidases.Thedirect supplyofprecursorsforisoprenoidbiosynthesisissupportedbytheincreasedexpressionof specificenzymes.Foracetyl-CoAinthecytosol,thecitrate-malate-pyruvateshuttle,including ATP-citrate-lyase,appearstoplayakeyrole,whileforGAPandPYRintheplastidsseveral sources are likely. Plastidic glycolysis probably plays a major role, but the recycling of metabolicCO2throughRuBisCOandreplenishmentofcarbonunitsfromtheoxidativepentose phosphate pathway could contribute significantly to the CBB cycle. Additionally, PYR and reducing power can be produced by the activity of the plastidic ME from malate. This, 28 however,alsorequiresthepresenceofplastidicmalateaswellasarefluxofC4-unitsfromthe cytosol into the plastids. Since the low expression of known C4 translocators does not correspondwiththeobservationofhighlyexpressedplastidicME,theexistenceofnovel,yet undiscoveredC4transportersisanticipated. Our model provides an initial framework for understanding these metabolic cell factories. Evaluatingthecontributionsofindividualenzymestotheglobalcarbonandenergybalanceof thesecellswillbethefocusofsubsequentwork.Thismodelalsoprovidessomenovelclues for applications in metabolic engineering of isoprenoids by transposing the knowledge to othersystems,forexampletoyeastormicroalgae. Methods Plantgrowth LA4024 and LA1777 seeds were obtained from the Tomato Genetics Resource Center, UC Davis, USA. Plants were grown in the greenhouse on soil in the following conditions: 65% humidity, in addition to sunlight artificial light tgenerated by MT250DL metal halide lamps withanintensityof165µmols-1mm2(16hlightperiod),25°C,)andwateredwithtapwater everytwodays.Onceaweektheplantsweretreatedwithafertilizersolution(0.1%Kamasol BrilliantBlau,CompoExpertGmbH,Germany).Plantmaterialwasharvested12and14weeks aftersowingduringthelightphaseintheearlyafternoon. Harvestoftrichomeandleafmaterial Fortrichomeharvest,whichalwaystookplaceataroundnoon,20–30cmlongtomatoleaves cutonebyonewereplacedinthepalmofoneglovedhandandexposedtothelight,and trichomeswerequickly(inlessthan5s)brushedofftheleaflets(around5cmeach)witha2 cmbroadpaintbrushthathadbeendippedinliquidnitrogenasdescribedinBalckeetal. (2014).Eachofthethreebiologicalreplicateswerecomposedofleavesof15plantsforLA1777 and 50 plants for LA4024. For each biological replicate, the leaves were cryo-brushed as describedabove,resultinginapooloftrichomes.Asubsetofthebrushedleavesdevoidof trichomeswerelikewiseusedtomakeapoolofleaves.Bothpooledtrichomesandpooled 29 trichome-freeleaveswereimmediatelycollectedinmortarsfilledwithliquidnitrogen.The crudequenchedtrichomefractionwasfurtherenrichedunderliquidnitrogenconditionsby sieving through steel sieves of 150 µm mesh width (Retsch, Haan, Germany)(Balcke et al., 2014).Trichome-freeleavesweregentlygroundinamortarlikewisefilledwithliquidnitrogen. After removal of all liquid nitrogen during storage at –80°C, leaves and trichomes were lyophilizedovernightforsubsequentmetabolomicsorremainedfrozeninadeepfreezeruntil use. Metaboliteextraction Using wall-reinforced cryo-tubes of 1.6 mL volume (Precellys Steel Kit 2.8mm, Peqlab BiotechnologieGmbH,Erlangen,Germany)filledwith5steelbeads(3mm),25mgaliquotsof dry leaf or trichome powder from three independent pools were resuspended in 900 µL dichloromethane/ethanol(–80°C).Then,200µLof50mMaqueousammoniumacetatebuffer (0°C,pH6.7)wasaddedtoeachvialandcellrupture/metaboliteextractionwasachievedby FastPrepbeadbeating(3x20s,speed6.5m/s,1stround–80°C,2ndroundroomtemperature; FastPrep24 instrument with cryo adapter, MP Biomedicals LLC, Santa Ana, CA, USA). After phaseseparationbycentrifugationat20,000xg(2min,4°C),150µLoftheaqueousphase was collected and the Fastprep beating was repeated after adding another 150 µL of ammonium acetate. After the second centrifugation, another 200 µL aqueous phase was combinedwiththefirstextractand600µLoftheorganicphasewascollected.Then,500µL fresh tetrahydrofuran (THF) was added twice to the extraction residue and the Fastprep beating was repeated. Each time, 450 µL THF extract was combined with the first organic phaseextract.Theaqueousphasewasthenlyophilizedandtheorganicphasewasdriedina streamofnitrogengas. ForanalysisofhydrophilicintermediatesbyionpairingLC-(-)ESI-MS,lyophilizedsamplesof theaqueousphaseweredissolvedin150µLofdeionizedwaterandfiltratedover0.2µmPVDF (96well,Corning,450xg,5min,4°C).Foranalysisofsemi-polarintermediatesintheorganic phase, dried samples were dissolved in 180 µL buffer of 75% methanol and 25% water, filtratedover0.2µmPVDF(96well,Corning,450xg,5min,0°C),andprocessedbyreverse phase LC-(+)ESI-MS and reverse phase LC-(-)ESI-MS. Detailed chromatography and mass 30 spectrometryparametersareprovidedinSupplementalTable3,SupplementalTable4and SupplementalDataset9. Foranalysisofvolatilemetabolites,surfaceextractswerecollectedfrom6leafletsofcirca5 cmlengthbyadding2mln-Hexaneandshakingfor1minute.Thehexanewastransferredto acleantubeandcentrifugedat16,000xgfor90secondstoremovedebris.Thehexaneextract wasthendirectlyinjectedintheGC. Metaboliteprofiling. Detectionapproach,datamatrix,datanormalization Non-targeted ion detection in LC-MS was achieved using an Acquity UPLC (Waters) and a TripleTOF5600massspectrometerusingthesoftwareAnalyst1.6TF(Sciex,Toronto,Canada). Hydrophilicmetaboliteswereseparatedbyionpairingchromatography(SupplementalTable 3)andsemi-polarmetaboliteswereseparatedbyreversedphaseUPLC(Balckeetal.,2014). TOF-MS1-massfeatureswereassayedbetween65–1250Dasimultaneouslywithanarrayof non-targetedQToF-MS2scanexperimentsbysequentialwindowacquisitionofalltheoretical fragment-ionspectra(SWATH)-QToF-MS/MS(Hopfgartneretal.,2012).Duringthelatter,the transmissionrangeforprecursorionsintheQ1-quadrupolwassetfor20mstomasswindows of33Daltonandwasincrementedfromm/z=65-1250.Simultaneously,CID-fragmentation wasacquiredinrelationtoeachSWATHtransmissionwindow.Thus,compromisingbetween Q1 dwell times and MS2 spectra purity, LC-SWATH-MS/MS measurements allow for rapid assessmentofMS1andMS2spectrawithcycletimesofbelow1s.Intotal,LC-SWATH-MS/MS resultedin8308MS1distinctmass/retentiontimefeatureswithreliableCIDfragmentation (3833aqueousphase,3475fromtheorganicphase).OutofallLC-MSfeatures,weassigned thestructureof243metabolitesbycomparisontotheretentiontime,exactmass(MS1),and CIDfragmentationpattern(MS2)ofauthenticstandards(SupplementalDatasets1,2and3). All data presented were normalized to dry weight. Since secondary metabolites of GT contributesignificantlytothedryweightofGTs,whichisnotthecaseinleaves,normalization based on dry weight to compare different plant organs may bias the conclusions made. Therefore,othernormalizationapproachesweretestedincludingnormalizationtothetotal nitrogencontentthoughttorepresentthetotalpoolofproteinsandnucleicacids.Basedon 31 thisnormalizationhowever,similartrendswereobservedandwechosetopresentthedata normalizedtodryweight. Ifauthenticstandardswerenotavailable,wepredictedthemetaboliteidentityoraffiliation to a class of secondary metabolites by exact mass, isotopic distribution of carbon in MS1 spectra,CIDfragmentationpatterns,andtheplausibilityofthemetaboliteappearanceand retention time in the chromatogram of aqueous or organic extracts. All LC- and MSparametersandalistofusedauthenticstandardsaregiveninSupplementalDatasets1,2,3, and9,andSupplementalTables3and4. Volatilemetabolitesweremeasuredfrom1µlofthehexanesupernatantbyGC–MSonaTrace GCUltragaschromatographcoupledtoanISQmassspectrometer(ThermoScientific).GC-MS analyseswereperformedaccordingtoBrückneretal.(2014). Estimationoftherutin,sesquiterpenecarboxylicacidandterpenecontentinGT Twenty-five milligrams of dry trichome material were exhaustively extracted by 10 consecutive extractions (short vortexing) with a mixture of 75% methanol and 25% water. AliquotsoftheextractsweredilutedtomeetthelinearrangeofthefollowingLC-MSanalysis. Rutin(Sigma)and(E,E)-farnesoicacid(EchelonInc.)purestandardswereusedforexternal calibration of Rutin in LA4024 and of two major sesquiterpene carboxylic acids ((+)-(E)-αsantalene12-oicacidand(+)-(E)-endo-bergamotene-12-oicacid)inLA1777trichomeextracts. Sincethelattercompoundswerebothnotcommerciallyavailable,weassumedthesameMS responseaswithfarnesoicacid.FortheestimationofterpenecontentinLA4024,leafsurface extractswerepreparedfromabout1.5cmlongleafletsinthreeconsecutiveextractionswith hexane containing dodecane at a concentration of 0.15 mg l-1 and measured by GC-MS as describedabove.Theconcentrationoftheterpeneswasestimatedbyaddingthepeakarea ofthefivemajormonoterpenesdetectedandusingthepeakareaofdodecaneasareference. Shot-gunproteomics ProteinExtractionandTrypsinDigestion One-hundredmilligramsoffrozen,powderedtomatotrichomesorleaves(threeindependent poolseach)werewashedwith10%TCAinacetonefollowedbyacetonebothat–20°C.The tissuepelletwassuspendedin400µlofextractionbuffer(100mMTris-HCl(pH8.5),1%(w/v) 32 SDS,25%(w/v)sucrose,5mMEDTA,0.5%(v/v)ß-mercaptoethanoland1%plantprotease inhibitorcocktail(Roche)),bothaddedfreshandthesuspensionwasmixedvigorouslyfor30 minutesatroomtemperature(RT).Anequalvolumeofwatersaturatedphenolwasadded andthehomogenatewasfurthermixedfor30minutes.Thehomogenatewascentrifugedat 10,000gfor10minutesatRT.Anequalvolumeofreextractionbuffer(100mMTris-HCl(pH 8.5),20mMKCl,25%(w/v)sucrose,10mMEDTA,0.5%(v/v)ß-mercaptoethanoladdedfresh) wasaddedtothetopphenolphase.Thehomogenatewasmixedvigorouslyfor15minutesat RT and centrifuged as described above. Proteins were precipitated from the phenol phase with5volumesof–20°C100mMammoniumacetateinmethanolovernight.Proteinswere collectedbycentrifugation,washedtwotimeswith20%50mMammoniumbicarbonate,80% acetoneanddissolvedin8Murea,50mMammoniumbicarbonate.Theconcentrationofthe protein solution was measured using the 2-D Quant Kit (GE Healthcare) following the manufacturer’sinstructions.Disulfidebondswerereducedwith200mMdithiothreitol(DTT), 100mMTris-HClandalkylatedwithanexcessof200mMiodoacetamide(IAA),100mMTrisHCl.Proteinsweredigestedwithtrypsin(enzymetoproteinratio1:50)at37°Covernight.The peptidesolutionwasdesaltedwithC18reversephasebatchchromatographyinSTAGEtips. TheC18matrixwasconditionedwith80%ACN,0.1%FAinddH2Oandequilibratedwith0.1% FAinddH2O,andretainedpeptideswerewashedwith0.1%FAinddH2Oandelutedwith80% ACN,0.1%FAinddH2O.Peptidesweredriedinavacuumconcentratoranddissolvedin5% ACN,0.1%TFA. LiquidChromatographyandMassSpectrometry Four micrograms of peptides were injected into an EASY nLC1000 liquid chromatography system from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Peptides were separated using C18 reverse phase chemistryonanEASY-columnSC001pre-column(length2cm,innerdiameter100µm,particle diameter5µm)in-linewithanEASY-SprayES803column(length50cm,innerdiameter75 µm,particlediameter2µm)bothfromThermoFisherScientificwithagradientfrom5%to 40%acetonitrilein9handaflowrateof250nl/min.Thecolumntemperaturewassetto40°C. Peptideionswereelectrosprayedon-lineintoanLTQOrbitrapVelosPromassspectrometer viaanEASYSprayionsourcebothfromThermoFisherScientific.Thesprayvoltagewas1.9kV, thecapillarytemperaturewas275°C,theS-lensRFlevelwas50%,themultipoleoffsetwas-7 V.FullMSsurveyscansofthetotalionpopulationwerecarriedoutwitharesolutionof60,000 33 in the Orbitrap mass analyzer. The automatic gain control (AGC) target value was 106; the maximuminjectiontime(maxIT)was500ms,and1microscanwasacquired.Fullscanswere followedbyupto20data-dependent(DDA)MS/MSscansofthemostabundantprecursor ionswithaminimumsignalthresholdof500fragmentedusingcollision-induceddissociation (CID)intheLTQmassanalyzer.TheAGCtargetvaluewas104;themaxITwas200ms,and1 microscanwasacquired.Thedynamicexclusionrepeatcountwas1andtherepeatduration was30s,theexclusiondurationwas240s,andtheexclusionmasswidthwas+/-10ppm. Massspectrawerecalibratedinternallyinrealtimeusingthem/z445.120024. PeptideandProteinIdentificationandQuantification Peptidespectralmatches(PSMs)weregeneratedwithMascotsoftwarev2.4.0fromMatrix Science linked to Proteome Discoverer v1.4 (PD) from Thermo Fisher Scientific. A signal to noisethresholdof1.5wasusedtofilterionsignalpeaksfromMSfullscans.TheInternational TomatoAnnotationGroup(ITAG)release2.3ofthetomatoproteomedatabaseamendedwith commoncontaminants(34727sequences,11956401residues)wassearchedwithaprecursor iontoleranceof7ppm,afragmentiontoleranceof0.8Da,enzymesettingtrypsin,2tolerated missed cleavages and carbamidomethylation of cystein as a fixed modification. The family wise PSM error rate was controlled via the false discovery rate (FDR/q-values) using the target/decoydatabasemodelforestimatingfalsepositivePSMswiththetargetdecoyPSM validatormoduleinPD.PeptidesandproteinswereidentifiedusingthePeptideandProtein ProphetalgorithmsinScaffoldv.4.0.5.A95%peptidethresholdandan80%proteinthreshold wereequivalenttoa0.01%peptideFDRanda0.2%proteinFDR.Proteinswerequantified usingthe“QuantitativeValue(NormalizedTotalSpectra)”optioninScaffold. Transcriptomics RNApreparation TotalRNAwasisolatedfromthreeindependentpoolsoftrichome-freeleavesandtrichome preparationsusingtheQiagenRNeasy™Kit.TheRNAwasDNAsetreatedwiththeAmbion DNA-free™ Kit, quantified via NanoDrop™ and quality assessed using the Qiagen Qiaxcel™ capillaryelectrophoresissystem.OnlysampleswithanestimatedRINnumberof8orgreater wereusedfordownstreamapplications. 34 Microarray Seventeen mRNA samples from six S. habrochaites accessions (LA1731, LA1753, LA1777, LA2158, LA2167, LA2650) and two S. lycopersicum accessions (LA4024, LA4005) were sequenced to obtain an average of 59,080,335 single end, 101 bp reads per library (SupplementalTable5).Readswerealignedtothetomatoreferencegenomeversion2.4using TopHat2v2.0.6withthefollowingparameters:--max-insertion-length9--max-deletion-length 9-p8-g1--library-typefr-unstranded-m1--read-gap-length12--read-edit-dist12--readmismatches 8 --read-realign-edit-dist 0 --no-coverage-search --segment-mismatches 3. An averageof82%ofallreadsmappeduniquelytothereference,withslightlymorereadsaligned intheS.lycopersicumsamples(SupplementalTable5).Foreachalignment,duplicatedreads werethenremovedandindelswererealignedusingPicardv1.65andGATKv2.2.8withdefault parameters.Alignmentsforalllibrariesfromthesameaccessionweremerged,resultinginan averageof103millionreadsperaccession(rangefrom74to166million,SupplementalTable 5).VariantsinallalignmentswerecalledsimultaneouslyusingGATKandtheresultingfilewas usedtodefineasetofexonicregionscoveredbyRNA-seqreadsbutfreeofanypolymorphism between LA4024 and LA1777. This analysis resulted in 403,328 regions larger than 25 bp distributedacross25,892outofthe34,727cDNAspresentintheITAGannotationv2.30.These sequenceswereprovidedtoAffymetrix,where398,006ofthesesequenceswereselectedto beincludedinthearray.Inaddition,anumberofprobestogenotypeLA1777andLA4024 were added to the chip. From the 363,286 SNPs found between these two accessions, we filteredforthosethathadnoothervariantin20bponeachsideandwereatleast20ntaway fromanexonboundary.Thisresultedin14,557probescontainingasingleSNPthatwerealso includedinthearray. Triplicate microarray hybridizations of leaf and trichome RNA preparations of LA1777 and LA4024 were performed on an Affymetrix GeneAtlas™ System with the custom designed microarraychips(seedescriptionabove).OnehundredfiftynanogramsoftotalRNAofeach preparationwasusedasstartingtemplateutilizingtheAmbionWTExpressionKit,theGene Chip Eukaryotic Poly A RNA Control Kit and the Gene Chip WT Terminal Sequencing Kit according to manufacturer’s protocols. Throughout the preparation, quality controls were conducted using the Qiagen Qiaxcel™ capillary electrophoresis system. Hybridization was performedfor20hat48°C. 35 QuantitativeReal-TimePCR FirststrandcDNAfromthreebiologicalreplicateswassynthesizedfrom150ngDNAsetreated totalRNAusingamixofoligo(dT)18andrandomhexamerprimerswiththeProtoScriptIIFirst Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (New England Biolabs). Samples were then prepared for the FluidigmFLEXsix™chipsaccordingtothemanufacturer’smanualandRT-qPCRwasperformed intechnicaltriplicatesonaFluidigmBiomarkHDsystem.Quantitative(q)PCRprimersforthe target genes were designed using the Primer3 program (Koressaar and Remm, 2007; Untergasseretal.,2012)andsequencescanbefoundinSupplementalTable1.Datawere analyzedusingtheFluidigmRealTimePCRAnalysisSoftwareV.4.1.2andrelativeexpression tothecontrolgeneSerine/threonine-proteinphosphatase2(Solyc05g006590)wascalculated usingthe2(ΔCt)method(LivakandSchmittgen,2001). 13 C-Labeling LabelingwithU13C-glucose:10leaveswith7leafletseachwerecutfromLA1777plantsand immediatelyputin50mLtubesfilledwith35mLU-13C-glucose(99%purity,EUROISO-TOP, Saint-AubinCedex,France)(10gL-1intapwater).Theleaveswereexposedtopermanentlight (165µmols-1mm2)forupto24h. Labeling with 13C-CO2: Six-week-old LA1777 plants grown in hydroponics on expanded clay were placed in a labeling cabinet (PhytolabelBox, developed together with Elektrochemie HalleGmbH)(dimensions:60x60x60cm). 13C-CO2labeling(99%purity,EUROISO-TOP)inthe light(165µmols-1mm2)forupto180minwasconductedat380ppmpartialpressureof13CCO2, 70% humidity and 20% oxygen, which was supplied from synthetic air (Linde AG, Germany). Residual atmospheric CO2 was removed by flushing the chamber’s atmosphere overdiverchalk(Spherasorb,Wokingham,UK)for20minbeforetheonsetof13C-CO2-labeling. Forharvest,theleaveswerecutatthestalkandwereimmediatelyquenchedinliquidnitrogen (LN2).AftergentlecrushingofleafmatterinamortarfilledwithLN2,leafpiecesandtrichomes wereseparatedbyshakingfor20swithcrusheddryiceinSchottbottlesof500mL.During thisprocess,thelidmustnotbetightlyclosedtoallowpressurerelease.Thefrozenleafpieces andtrichomeheadsobtainedweresubsequentlysievedinliquidnitrogenover150µmsteel 36 sieves,withthesievebeingrepeatedlyliftedandsettledinLN2.Thetrichome-freeleafpieces remained on the 150 µm sieve, and the GT heads were collected on a 45 µm sieve. Two biological replicates were made from pools of three plants each (both for leaves and trichomes).Allplantmatterwaslyophilizedovernight.Thereafterthesebiologicalreplicates werefurtherdividedintothreealiquotsof25mgdryweighteach,whichwereextractedand measured independently as technical replicates. The plant material was kept frozen throughouttheentireprocedureandstoredovernightat-25°Ctoletthedryiceandliquid nitrogenevaporate.Furtherstorageoccurredat-80°C.Metaboliteextractionwasperformed as described above. Each pool was extracted in triplicate, resulting in hexuplicate determinations. For LC-MS/MS analysis of the aqueous extraction phase by ion pairing chromatography,aspecialmultiplereactionmonitoringmethod,wasusedwhereisotopolog isoformsofselectedmetaboliteswererecordedusingaSciex6500QTRAPandthesoftware Analyst1.7(Sciex,Toronto,Canada)(SupplementalTable4). Dataanalysis Metabolomics data. Peak quantification of known compounds by area was done using the softwareMultiquant3.0(Sciex).Retrospectiveextractionofm/zandretentiontimefeatures fromuntargetedLC-TOF-MS1runswasperformedusingthesoftwareMarkerView1(Sciex). PCA and PLS analysis on dry weight-normalized data were conducted using SIMCA 13.0.3 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden). For this, each individual metabolite signal of interest was first dividedbytheaverageofthecorrespondingsignalintheleafsamplesofLA1777.Then,the dataratiowaslog10-transformedandfinallyPareto-scaled.Thisway,up-anddown-regulated signalsofanyintensityarenormallydistributedbutrelativechangesbetweentrichomeand leafareemphasized.WearbitrarilychoseGTofLA1777tonormalizealldata. R2X[1] is the cumulative sum of squares of the entire X that can be explained by principal component1.(X=log-normalizedpeakheightsrelativetoLA1777leafmatter).Q2X(cum)The cumulative fraction of the total variation of X and Y that can be predicted by principal component1forallofitsx-variablesandy-variables(X=log-normalizedpeakheightsrelative toLA1777leafmatter;Y-variables1=GT;2=leaves). 37 Other omics data processing and statistical analysis. Affymetrix exon microarrays were hybridized and imaged using the Affymetrix GeneAtlas System and pre-processed by Affymetrix Power Tools (v. 1.15.1). Multiple probes of each probeset were summarized by median polish. Raw datasets were normalized by robust multi-array averaging (RMA). To remove background noise, data were filtered for undetected probesets as described in (Lockstone, 2011) using Detection Above Background (DABG) tests at the exon-level implemented in APT. Undetected probesets were excluded prior to differential gene expressionanalysis. Linear models were fitted with Bioconductor's limma package (Smyth, 2005) and p-values were adjusted using Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate (< 0.05) procedure (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). Differentially expressed genes were identified by a significancethresholdof0.05andaminimallog2-fold-changeof±1. Low expressed proteins detected by quantitative shotgun proteomics were filtered by an independentfilteringapproachusingthegenefilterpackage(Gentleman,2009)andexcluded from further analyses. The PLGEM package (Pavelka et al., 2004) was used for differential expressionanalyseswithasignificancethresholdof0.01.Thesuitabilityofthispackagefor analyzingdatasetsderivedfromshotgunproteomicswasprovenearlier(Pavelkaetal.,2008). Afterdataprocessingandnormalization,20445genesand4390proteinsannotatedwitha Solyc tomato ID formed the basis for gene expression and protein abundance analysis between trichomes and trichome-free leaves. Individual values as well as the averages of triplicates,log2-foldchangebetweengroupsandthefalsediscoveryrate(FDR)adjustedpvaluesfromamoderatedt-test(Smyth,2005)areshowninSupplementalDataset5.Principal componentanalysisandhierarchicalclusteringdemonstratingthatreplicatesgrouptogether asexpectedareshowninSupplementalFigure17. Correlation between transcriptomics and proteomics within tissues was estimated by calculatingthePearsoncoefficient,whichproducedslightlypositivervaluesof0.341(LA1777 leaf), 0.367 (LA1777 trichome) and 0.418 (LA4024-leaf), 0.414 (LA4024 – trichome). Moderatelypositivecorrelationsbetweentranscriptomeandproteomedataareusualand havebeenreportedpreviously(Maieretal.,2009).InarecentstudyinZeamays(maize), similarcorrelationsvalueswereobserved,butenrichmentcategorieswerefoundtobehighly 38 similar between transcriptome and proteome data (Walley et al., 2016). The enrichment analysis (see Supplemental Dataset 6) points to a similar trend. Functional categories that showastrongenrichmentatthetranscriptomelevelarealsoenrichedattheproteomelevel (e.g.,photosynthesis,Calvincycle,isoprenoidmetabolism,lipidmetabolism). The MapMan hierarchical ontology was used for functional annotation of the studied transcriptomes and proteomes of both Solanum species (Thimm et al., 2004). The official mappingfilefortheITAG2.3releasewasusedinallsubsequentanalyses.Enrichmentanalyses wereperformedusingPageManintheMapManprogram. PhylogeneticAnalysis AphylogenetictreeoftheBileAcidSodiumSymporter(BASS)proteinfamilyfromArabidopsis and tomato (S. lycopersicum) was generated with the Geneious software v 6.1.8 (www.geneious.com).FirsttheBASSproteinsequencesfromthesetwospecieswerealigned using the MUSCLE alignment algorithm with the following options: maximum number of iterations=10;distancemeasure=kmer6_6forthefirsttwoiterationsthenpctid_kimurafor thesubsequentones,clusteringmethod=UPGMB;treerootingmethod=pseudo;sequence weighingscheme=CLUSTALW;terminalgaps=halfpenalty;objectivescore=spm;anchor spacing=32;gapopenscore=-1.ThealignmentwasthenfedintotheGeneiousTreeBuilder with the following options: genetic distance model = Jukes-Cantor; tree build method = neighbor-joiningwithoutoutgroup;numberofreplicatesforthebootstrapresampling=1000; supportthresholdof45%.ThetreewasthenexportedintheunrootedlayouttoCorelDraw formanualeditingandannotatingofBASSfunctions. Predictionofthesubcellularlocalization TheproteinsequenceoftheindividualSolGeneIDwasloadedintoWolfPSort(accessiblevia http://www.genscript.com/wolf-psort.html), Sherloc2 (http://abi.inf.uni- tuebingen.de/Services/SherLoc2) and iPSort (http://ipsort.hgc.jp). In some cases, the respectiveproteinsequenceswereblastedagainsttheclosesthomologinArabidopsisandthe SUBApredictiontoolwasalsoused(accessibleviahttp://www.arabidopsis.org). 39 Lightmicroscopy Microscopyanalysisofleavesandtrichomeswasperformedaspreviouslypublished(Bergau et al., 2015). Trichomes on the leaves were observed in brightfield with an AZ100 (Nikon, Japan). Fluorescence was observed with a LSM 710 microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Autofluorescencewasexcitedat405nmandrecordedat420–545nm(cellwall)and645–735 nm(chloroplasts). Transmissionelectronmicroscopy Leaves and trichomes were fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde (Sigma Aldrich,Taufkirchen, Germany)insodiumcacodylatebuffer(SCB)pH7.2for4hatroomtemperature,washedwith SCB,postfixedwith1%osmiumtetroxide(CarlRoth,Karlsruhe,Germany)inSCB,dehydrated inagradedethanolseries,andembeddedinepoxyresin.Afterpolymerization,thematerial wassectionedwithanUltramicrotomeS(Leica;Wetzlar,Germany).Ultrathinsections(80nm) were transferred to formvar-coated grids and post-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate.ThesectionswereobservedwithaZeissLibra120transmissionelectronmicroscope operating at 120 kV (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Oberkochen, Germany). Images were taken applyingaDual-SpeedonaxisSSCCDcamera(BM-2k-120;TRS,Moorenweis,Germany). ROSstaining Staining with dihydroethidium (Sigma) was performed according to (Owusu-Ansah et al., 2008).Insteadofthedescribedbuffer,asorbitolbuffer(200mMsorbitol,50mMTris-Cl,20 mM Suc, 10 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM succinic acid, 1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM K2HPO4 and 0,015%TritonX-100)wasused.Stainingoccurredafter3x3minvacuumfiltrationofasingle tomatoleaflet.Thelaseremissionwavelengthwas514nm.Thefluorescencereadoutwindow wassetto540–620nm. AccessionNumbers ThemetabolomicsrawdataandmetaboliteabundancesareavailableatMetaboLightsunder the accession number MTBLS297. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the 40 datasetidentifierPXD003154.TranscriptomicsrawdataareavailableinArrayExpressunder theaccessionnumberE-MTAB-4482. SupplementalData SupplementalFigure1.Venndiagramsofdifferentiallyregulatedomicssignalswithalog2foldchange>1. Supplemental Figure 2. Total GC-MS and LC-MS ion chromatograms from S. habrochaites LA1777andS.lycopersicumLA4024extracts. SupplementalFigure3.Fattyacidandoxylipinpeakareasfromtrichomeandtrichome-free leafextracts. SupplementalFigure4.MS/MSspectraofapeakelutingat13.8minwith[M-H]:m/z295.228. Supplemental Figure 5. Scores of a principle component analysis comparing 115 selected signalsfromhydrophilicextractsofleaves(LVS)andtrichomes(TRI)ofLA1777andLA4024. Supplemental Figure 6. MapMan transcriptomics and proteomics overview of the cellular metabolisminLA4024. SupplementalFigure7.MapManproteomicsoverviewofthecellularmetabolisminLA1777. SupplementalFigure8.TimecourseafterpulselabelingofLA1777with13C-CO2andU-13C-Dglucose. Supplemental Figure 9. Biosynthesis of isoprenoid precursors in leaves and trichomes of LA4024andLA1777. Supplemental Figure 10. ROS staining of LA1777 using dihydroethidium (DHE) and laser scanningmicroscopy. Supplemental Figure 11. Transcript levels and protein abundances of lipoxygenases of cytosolicandplastidiclocalization. SupplementalFigure12.DifferentialtranscriptandproteinlevelsofREDOXenzymefamilies. Supplemental Figure 13. 13C-incorporation into citrate and isocitrate after 24 h labeling of LA1777withU-13C-D-glucoseinpermanentlight. SupplementalFigure14.MapManoverviewofcytosolicandplastidicglycolysisandplastid transporters(triosephosphate,putativepyruvateandmalate)inLA1777. Supplemental Figure 15. Phylogenetic tree of proteins of the bile acid sodium symporter (BASS)familyfromArabidopsisthalianaandSolanumlycopersicum. 41 Supplemental Figure 16. Expression of NADPH-producing enzyme families in GT versus trichome-freeleaves. Supplemental Figure 17. Principle component and hierarchical cluster analyses of transcriptomeandproteomedata. SupplementalTable1.GeneswhoseexpressionwasverifiedbyqRT-PCRandcorresponding primers. SupplementalTable2.ListofgenesoftheMEVandMEPpathways. SupplementalTable3.Chromatographyconditions. SupplementalTable4.MSparametersfortheuntargetedanalysisofhydrophilicandsemipolarmetabolitesby(-)ESI-SWATH-MS/MS. SupplementalTable5.SummaryofRNAseqsamplesanddata. SupplementalDataset1.PeakHeightsofsemi-polarmetabolitesasextractedfromTOF-MS1 byMarkerView(ESInegative). SupplementalDataset2.PeakheightsofhydrophilicmetabolitesasextractedfromTOF-MS1 byMarkerView(ESInegative). SupplementalDataset3.Peakareasofhydrophilicmetabolites. Supplemental Dataset 4. Prediction of loadings of the principal component analysis of hydrophilicmetabolites. SupplementalDataset5.Transcriptomicsandproteomicsdata. SupplementalDataset6.Enrichmentanalysis. SupplementalDataset7.Standarddeviation(n=6measurements)ofisotopologsfrom13Clabelingexperiments. SupplementalDataset8.MultiplealignmentofBASSproteinsfromArabidopsisthalianaand Solanumlycopersicum. SupplementalDataset9.MSparametersforthetargetedanalysisofselectedmetabolitesand their13C-isotopologsvia(-)ESIandscheduledmultiplereactionmonitoring. Acknowledgments WewouldliketoacknowledgetheassistanceofGerdHausewiththeelectronmicroscopy, (Biozentrum,Martin-LutherUniversitätHalle-Wittenberg)andMarioBauerattheHelmholtzCentreforEnvironmentalResearchforprovidingaccesstotheBiomarkHDsystem.Weare gratefultoMichaelHahnandcoworkersofElektrochemieHalleGmbHforthecollaborative 42 development of a prototype for 13C-phytolabeling. This work was funded in part by the DeutscheForschungsgemeinschaft(grantnumberTI800/1)toAT. AuthorContributions GBdevelopedthemetaboliteprofilingapproachandthePhytolabelBoxincollaborationwith ElektrochemieHalleGmbH,performedtheomicsdataanalysis,andwrotethemanuscript.SB extracted RNA, conducted hybridizations, and performed RT-qPCR and GC-MS runs. NB prepared the plant material and extracts, conducted LC-MS runs, contributed to the data analysis,performedROSstaining,andgeneratedmicrographs.AHassistedGBandNBwith sample preparation. BA performed bioinformatics data analysis of transcriptome and proteomedata.PMandWHperformedshot-gunproteomicsmeasurementsandanalysis. JJGanalyzedtheRNAseqdataoftomatoanddesignedthegeneexpressionmicroarraybased on these data. AT conceived and supervised the project, performed transcriptome and proteome data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and revised the manuscript. References Balcke,G.U.,Bennewitz,S.,Zabel,S.,andTissier,A.(2014).Isoprenoidandmetaboliteprofilingof planttrichomes.Methodsinmolecularbiology1153,189-202. Benjamini,Y.,andHochberg,Y.(1995).ControllingtheFalseDiscoveryRate-aPracticalandPowerful ApproachtoMultipleTesting.JRoyStatSocBMet57,289-300. Bergau,N.,Bennewitz,S.,Syrowatka,F.,Hause,G.,andTissier,A.(2015).Thedevelopmentoftype VI glandular trichomes in the cultivated tomato Solanum lycopersicum and a related wild speciesS.habrochaites.BMCplantbiology15,289. Besser,K.,Harper,A.,Welsby,N.,Schauvinhold,I.,Slocombe,S.,Li,Y.,Dixon,R.A.,andBroun,P. (2009).DivergentRegulationofTerpenoidMetabolismintheTrichomesofWildandCultivated TomatoSpecies.PlantPhysiol149,499-514. Bleeker,P.M.,Mirabella,R.,Diergaarde,P.J.,VanDoorn,A.,Tissier,A.,Kant,M.R.,Prins,M.,deVos, M., Haring, M.A., and Schuurink, R.C. (2012). Improved herbivore resistance in cultivated tomatowiththesesquiterpenebiosyntheticpathwayfromawildrelative.ProcNatlAcadSci USA109,20124-20129. Bleeker,P.M.,Diergaarde,P.J.,Ament,K.,Schutz,S.,Johne,B.,Dijkink,J.,Hiemstra,H.,deGelder, R.,deBoth,M.T.,Sabelis,M.W.,Haring,M.A.,andSchuurink,R.C.(2011).Tomato-produced 7-epizingibereneandR-curcumeneactasrepellentstowhiteflies.Phytochemistry72,68-73. Brückner,K.,Bozic,D.,Manzano,D.,Papaefthimiou,D.,Pateraki,I.,Scheler,U.,Ferrer,A.,deVos, R.C.,Kanellis,A.K.,andTissier,A.(2014).Characterizationoftwogenesforthebiosynthesis of abietane-type diterpenes in rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) glandular trichomes. Phytochemistry101,52-64. Caspi,R.,Altman,T.,Billington,R.,Dreher,K.,Foerster,H.,Fulcher,C.A.,Holland,T.A.,Keseler,I.M., Kothari,A.,Kubo,A.,Krummenacker,M.,Latendresse,M.,Mueller,L.A.,Ong,Q.,Paley,S., 43 Subhraveti,P.,Weaver,D.S.,Weerasinghe,D.,Zhang,P.,andKarp,P.D.(2014).TheMetaCyc databaseofmetabolicpathwaysandenzymesandtheBioCyccollectionofPathway/Genome Databases.Nucleicacidsresearch42,D459-471. Chen, Z.H., Walker, R.P., Acheson, R.M., and Leegood, R.C. (2002). Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinaseassayedatphysiologicalconcentrationsofmetalionshasahighaffinityforCO2. PlantPhysiol128,160-164. Coates,R.M.,Denissen,J.F.,Juvik,J.A.,andBabka,B.A.(1988).IdentificationofAlpha-Santalenoic and Endo-Beta-Bergamotenoic Acids as Moth Oviposition Stimulants from Wild Tomato Leaves.JOrgChem53,2186-2192. Consortium,T.G.(2012).Thetomatogenomesequenceprovidesinsightsintofleshyfruitevolution. Nature485,635-641. Croteau, R.B., Davis, E.M., Ringer, K.L., and Wildung, M.R. (2005). (-)-Menthol biosynthesis and moleculargenetics.Naturwissenschaften92,562-577. Cui,H.,Zhang,S.T.,Yang,H.J.,Ji,H.,andWang,X.J.(2011).Geneexpressionprofileanalysisoftobacco leaftrichomes.BMCplantbiology11,76. Dudareva, N., Andersson, S., Orlova, I., Gatto, N., Reichelt, M., Rhodes, D., Boland, W., and Gershenzon, J. (2005). The nonmevalonate pathway supports both monoterpene and sesquiterpeneformationinsnapdragonflowers.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA102,933-938. Eisenhut, M., Hocken, N., and Weber, A.P.M. (2015). Plastidial metabolite transporters integrate photorespirationwithcarbon,nitrogen,andsulfurmetabolism.CellCalcium58,98-104. Ekanayaka,E.A.P.,Li,C.,andJones,A.D.(2014).Sesquiterpenoidglycosidesfromglandulartrichomes ofthewildtomatorelativeSolanumhabrochaites.Phytochemistry98,223-231. Fahn,A.(2000).Structureandfunctionofsecretorycells.InPlantTrichomes,D.L.HallahanandJ.C. Gray,eds(AcademicPress:NewYork),pp.37. Flügge,U.I.,Hausler,R.E.,Ludewig,F.,andGierth,M.(2011).Theroleoftransportersinsupplying energytoplantplastids.JExpBot62,2381-2392. Fobes,J.F.,Mudd,J.B.,andMarsden,M.P.(1985).EpicuticularLipidAccumulationontheLeavesof Lycopersiconpennellii(Corr.)D'ArcyandLycopersiconesculentumMill.PlantPhysiol77,567570. Frelichowski, J.E., and Juvik, J.A. (2005). Inheritance of sesquiterpene carboxylic acid synthesis in crossesofLycopersiconhirsutumwithinsect-susceptibletomatoes.PlantBreeding124,277281. Furumoto,T.,Yamaguchi,T.,Ohshima-Ichie,Y.,Nakamura,M.,Tsuchida-Iwata,Y.,Shimamura,M., Ohnishi,J.,Hata,S.,Gowik,U.,Westhoff,P.,Brautigam,A.,Weber,A.P.,andIzui,K.(2011). Aplastidialsodium-dependentpyruvatetransporter.Nature476,472-475. Gang,D.R.,Wang,J.,Dudareva,N.,Nam,K.H.,Simon,J.E.,Lewinsohn,E.,andPichersky,E.(2001). An investigation of the storage and biosynthesis of phenylpropenes in sweet basil. Plant Physiol125,539-555. Gentleman, R.C.C., V.J.; Huber, W.; Hahne, F. (2009). Genefilter: methods for filtering gens from microarrayexperiments.RPackageVersion1.24.2.. Ghosh, B., Westbrook, T.C., and Jones, A.D. (2014). Comparative structural profiling of trichome specialized metabolites in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and S-habrochaites: acylsugar profilesrevealedbyUHPLC/MSandNMR.Metabolomics10,496-507. Gigolashvili,T.,Yatusevich,R.,Rollwitz,I.,Humphry,M.,Gershenzon,J.,andFlugge,U.I.(2009).The plastidic bile acid transporter 5 is required for the biosynthesis of methionine-derived glucosinolatesinArabidopsisthaliana.ThePlantcell21,1813-1829. Glas,J.J.,Schimmel,B.C.J.,Alba,J.M.,Escobar-Bravo,R.,Schuurink,R.C.,andKant,M.R.(2012).Plant GlandularTrichomesasTargetsforBreedingorEngineeringofResistancetoHerbivores.IntJ MolSci13,17077-17103. 44 Hopfgartner,G.,Tonoli,D.,andVaresio,E.(2012).High-resolutionmassspectrometryforintegrated qualitative and quantitative analysis of pharmaceuticals in biological matrices. Anal Bioanal Chem402,2587-2596. Jin,J.,Panicker,D.,Wang,Q.,Kim,M.J.,Liu,J.,Yin,J.L.,Wong,L.,Jang,I.C.,Chua,N.H.,andSarojam, R.(2014).Nextgenerationsequencingunravelsthebiosyntheticabilityofspearmint(Mentha spicata)peltateglandulartrichomesthroughcomparativetranscriptomics.BMCplantbiology 14,292. Kim, J., Kang, K., Gonzales-Vigil, E., Shi, F., Jones, A.D., Barry, C.S., and Last, R.L. (2012). Striking NaturalDiversityinGlandularTrichomeAcylsugarCompositionIsShapedbyVariationatthe Acyltransferase2 Locus in the Wild Tomato Solanum habrochaites. Plant Physiol 160, 18541870. Kim,J.,Matsuba,Y.,Ning,J.,Schilmiller,A.L.,Hammar,D.,Jones,A.D.,Pichersky,E.,andLast,R.L. (2014). Analysis of natural and induced variation in tomato glandular trichome flavonoids identifiesagenenotpresentinthereferencegenome.ThePlantcell26,3272-3285. Kokwaro,G.(2009).Ongoingchallengesinthemanagementofmalaria.Malariajournal8Suppl1,S2. Koressaar, T., and Remm, M. (2007). Enhancements and modifications of primer design program Primer3.Bioinformatics23,1289-1291. Kunst, L., and Samuels, L. (2009). Plant cuticles shine: advances in wax biosynthesis and export. Currentopinioninplantbiology12,721-727. Li,C.,Wang,Z.Z.,andJones,A.D.(2014).Chemicalimagingoftrichomespecializedmetabolitesusing contactprintingandlaserdesorption/ionizationmassspectrometry.AnalBioanalChem406, 171-182. Lipko,A.,andSwiezewska,E.(2016).Isoprenoidgeneratingsystemsinplants-Ahandytoolboxhow to assess contribution of the mevalonate and methylerythritol phosphate pathways to the biosyntheticprocess.ProgressinLipidResearch63,70-92. Livak, K.J., and Schmittgen, T.D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitativePCRandthe2(-DeltaDeltaC(T))Method.Methods25,402-408. Lockstone, H.E. (2011). Exon array data analysis using Affymetrix power tools and R statistical software.BriefBioinform12,634-644. Ludewig,F.,andFlügge,U.-I.(2013).Roleofmetabolitetransportersinsource-sinkcarbonallocation. FrontiersinPlantScience4. Maier,T.,Guell,M.,andSerrano,L.(2009).CorrelationofmRNAandproteinincomplexbiological samples.FEBSletters583,3966-3973. McDowell,E.T.,Kapteyn,J.,Schmidt,A.,Li,C.,Kang,J.H.,Descour,A.,Shi,F.,Larson,M.,Schilmiller, A.,An,L.L.,Jones,A.D.,Pichersky,E.,Soderlund,C.A.,andGang,D.R.(2011).Comparative FunctionalGenomicAnalysisofSolanumGlandularTrichomeTypes.PlantPhysiol155,524539. Nonomura,T.,Xu,L.,Wada,M.,Kawamura,S.,Miyajima,T.,Nishitomi,A.,Kakutani,K.,Takikawa, Y.,Matsuda,Y.,andToyoda,H.(2009).TrichomeexudatesofLycopersiconpennelliiforma chemicalbarriertosuppressleaf-surfacegerminationofOidiumneolycopersiciconidia.Plant Sci176,31-37. Oliver,D.J.,Nikolau,B.J.,andWurtele,E.S.(2009).Acetyl-CoA-Lifeatthemetabolicnexus.PlantSci 176,597-601. Owusu-Ansah,E.,Yavari,A.,andBanerjee,U.(2008).Aprotocolfor_invivo_detectionofreactive oxygenspecies.ProtocolExchange. Pavelka,N.,Pelizzola,M.,Vizzardelli,C.,Capozzoli,M.,Splendiani,A.,Granucci,F.,andRicciardiCastagnoli,P.(2004).Apowerlawglobalerrormodelfortheidentificationofdifferentially expressedgenesinmicroarraydata.BmcBioinformatics5. Pavelka, N., Fournier, M.L., Swanson, S.K., Pelizzola, M., Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P., Florens, L., and Washburn, M.P. (2008). Statistical similarities between transcriptomics and quantitative shotgunproteomicsdata.MolCellProteomics7,631-644. 45 Sallaud, C., Rontein, D., Onillon, S., Jabes, F., Duffe, P., Giacalone, C., Thoraval, S., Escoffier, C., Herbette, G., Leonhardt, N., Causse, M., and Tissier, A. (2009). A novel pathway for sesquiterpene biosynthesis from Z,Z-farnesyl pyrophosphate in the wild tomato Solanum habrochaites.ThePlantcell21,301-317. Samuels, L., Kunst, L., and Jetter, R. (2008). Sealing plant surfaces: cuticular wax formation by epidermalcells.Annualreviewofplantbiology59,683-707. Savchenko,T.,Walley,J.W.,Chehab,E.W.,Xiao,Y.,Kaspi,R.,Pye,M.F.,Mohamed,M.E.,Lazarus, C.M., Bostock, R.M., and Dehesh, K. (2010). Arachidonic acid: an evolutionarily conserved signalingmoleculemodulatesplantstresssignalingnetworks.ThePlantcell22,3193-3205. Schilmiller,A.,Shi,F.,Kim,J.,Charbonneau,A.L.,Holmes,D.,Jones,A.D.,andLast,R.L.(2010).Mass spectrometry screening reveals widespread diversity in trichome specialized metabolites of tomatochromosomalsubstitutionlines.PlantJ62,391-403. Schilmiller,A.L.,Charbonneau,A.L.,andLast,R.L.(2012).IdentificationofaBAHDacetyltransferase thatproducesprotectiveacylsugarsintomatotrichomes.PNatlAcadSciUSA109,1637716382. Schilmiller,A.L.,Schauvinhold,I.,Larson,M.,Xu,R.,Charbonneau,A.L.,Schmidt,A.,Wilkerson,C., Last,R.L.,andPichersky,E.(2009).Monoterpenesintheglandulartrichomesoftomatoare synthesizedfromaneryldiphosphateprecursorratherthangeranyldiphosphate.PNatlAcad SciUSA106,10865-10870. Schmid-Siegert,E.,Stepushenko,O.,Glauser,G.,andFarmer,E.E.(2016).MembranesasStructural Antioxidants: RECYCLING OF MALONDIALDEHYDE TO ITS SOURCE IN OXIDATION-SENSITIVE CHLOROPLASTFATTYACIDS.TheJournalofbiologicalchemistry291,13005-13013. Schmidt,A.,Li,C.,Shi,F.,Jones,A.D.,andPichersky,E.(2011).Polymethylatedmyricetinintrichomes of the wild tomato species Solanum habrochaites and characterization of trichome-specific 3'/5'-and7/4'-myricetinO-methyltransferases.PlantPhysiol155,1999-2009. Schwender, J., Goffman, F., Ohlrogge, J.B., and Shachar-Hill, Y. (2004). Rubisco without the Calvin cycleimprovesthecarbonefficiencyofdevelopinggreenseeds.Nature432,779-782. Shtaida, N., Khozin-Goldberg, I., and Boussiba, S. (2015). The role of pyruvate hub enzymes in supplyingcarbonprecursorsforfattyacidsynthesisinphotosyntheticmicroalgae.Photosynth Res125,407-422. Slocombe,S.P.,Schauvinhold,I.,McQuinn,R.P.,Besser,K.,Welsby,N.A.,Harper,A.,Aziz,N.,Li,Y., Larson,T.R.,Giovannoni,J.,Dixon,R.A.,andBroun,P.(2008).TranscriptomicandReverse GeneticAnalysesofBranched-ChainFattyAcidandAcylSugarProductioninSolanumpennellii andNicotianabenthamiana.PlantPhysiol148,1830-1846. Smyth,G.K.(2005).Limma:linearmodelsformicroarraydata.InBioinformaticsandComputational Biology Solutions Using {R} and Bioconductor, R.C. Gentleman, V.; Dudoit, S.; Irizarry, R.; Huber,W.,ed(Springer:NewYork),pp.397–420. Soetaert,S.S.,VanNeste,C.M.,Vandewoestyne,M.L.,Head,S.R.,Goossens,A.,VanNieuwerburgh, F.C.,andDeforce,D.L.(2013).Differentialtranscriptomeanalysisofglandularandfilamentous trichomesinArtemisiaannua.BMCplantbiology13,220. Tcherkez,G.,Mahe,A.,Boex-Fontvieille,E.,Gout,E.,Guerard,F.,andBligny,R.(2011).Experimental Evidence of Phosphoenolpyruvate Resynthesis from Pyruvate in Illuminated Leaves. Plant Physiol157,86-95. Thimm,O.,Blasing,O.,Gibon,Y.,Nagel,A.,Meyer,S.,Kruger,P.,Selbig,J.,Muller,L.A.,Rhee,S.Y., andStitt,M.(2004).MAPMAN:auser-driventooltodisplaygenomicsdatasetsontodiagrams ofmetabolicpathwaysandotherbiologicalprocesses.PlantJ37,914-939. Tissier,A.(2012).Glandulartrichomes:whatcomesafterexpressedsequencetags?PlantJ70,51-68. Turner,G.W.,Gershenzon,J.,andCroteau,R.B.(2000).Developmentofpeltateglandulartrichomes ofpeppermint.PlantPhysiol124,665-680. Untergasser,A.,Cutcutache,I.,Koressaar,T.,Ye,J.,Faircloth,B.C.,Remm,M.,andRozen,S.G.(2012). Primer3--newcapabilitiesandinterfaces.Nucleicacidsresearch40,e115. 46 vanDerHoeven,R.S.,Monforte,A.J.,Breeden,D.,Tanksley,S.D.,andSteffens,J.C.(2000).Genetic control and evolution of sesquiterpene biosynthesis in Lycopersicon esculentum and L. hirsutum.ThePlantcell12,2283-2294. Walley, J.W., Sartor, R.C., Shen, Z., Schmitz, R.J., Wu, K.J., Urich, M.A., Nery, J.R., Smith, L.G., Schnable, J.C., Ecker, J.R., and Briggs, S.P. (2016). Integration of omic networks in a developmentalatlasofmaize.Science(NewYork,N.Y.)353,814-818. Weber,A.P.M.,andBrautigam,A.(2013).Theroleofmembranetransportinmetabolicengineering ofplantprimarymetabolism.CurrOpinBiotech24,256-262. Xiao,Y.M.,Savchenko,T.,Baidoo,E.E.K.,Chehab,W.E.,Hayden,D.M.,Tolstikov,V.,Corwin,J.A., Kliebenstein,D.J.,Keasling,J.D.,andDehesh,K.(2012).RetrogradeSignalingbythePlastidial Metabolite MEcPP Regulates Expression of Nuclear Stress-Response Genes. Cell 149, 15251535. Xing,S.F.,vanDeenen,N.,Magliano,P.,Frahm,L.,Forestier,E.,Nawrath,C.,Schaller,H.,Gronover, C.S.,Prufer,D.,andPoirier,Y.(2014).ATPcitratelyaseactivityispost-translationallyregulated bysinkstrengthandimpactsthewax,cutinandrubberbiosyntheticpathways.PlantJ79,270284. 47 Figure 1. Bright field, fluorescence and electron microscopy of type VI glandular trichomes. Light microscopy: leaflets of S. lycopersicum LA4024 (A) and wild-type S. habrochaites LA1777 (C) showing different trichome density. (B and D) Left side: section of leaves from LA4024 (B) and LA1777 (D) showing the epidermis and mesophyll cells; right side: fluorescence microscopy of trichome head cells from LA4024 (B) and LA1777 (D) viewed from above (top) or from the side (bottom). Transmission electron microscopy: (E) section of a leaf from LA1777 highlighting the thickness of the outer cell wall and cuticle of the epidermal cells and the cell wall of internal cells; (F) head of a type VI trichome from LA1777 illustrating the size of the intercellular storage cavity and the thickness of the outer cell wall. A B Component R2X 1 2 3 Q2(cum) 0.775 0.743 0.152 0.906 0.047 0.962 LA1777TRI LA4024TRI LA1777LVS LA4024LVS Figure 2. Principle component analysis of semi-polar metabolites measured in negative ESI-mode. The data consist of 3476 signals, each corresponding to a unique m/z and retention time combination. A) Scores and B) Loadings. In the loading plot, the colors of the circles correspond to metabolite classes of interest, and the size of the circle reflects the average pool size of the respective metabolite over all of the samples. For simplicity, only signals that could be associated with a metabolite group are shown (in total 129). The entire data set, i.e. including unknowns, is presented in Supplemental Dataset 1. All data are weight-normalized and Pareto-scaled. Abbreviations: FA – fatty acids, PUFA – polyunsaturated fatty acid, AS – acyl sugar, SQTCA - sesquiterpene carboxylic acid; R2X Cumulative sum of squares of the entire X explained by principal components 1-3. (X = lognormalized peak heights relative to LA1777 leaf matter); Q2X(cum) - Cumulative fraction of the total variation of X and Y that can be predicted by principal components. Figure 3 . Loadings of PLS-analyses of 115 selected MS signals from hydrophilic extracts. Red: related to photosynthesis and starch formation, black: related to isoprenoid biosynthesis, blue: lipid, yellow: inositol polyphosphates. A: analysis of polar metabolites of LA1777; B: analysis of polar metabolites of LA 4024. For abbreviations, see Supplemental Dataset 3. R2X[1]: cumulative sum of squares of the entire X explained by principal component 1 (X = log-normalized peak heights relative to LA1777 leaf matter); Q2X(cum): cumulative fraction of the total variation of X that can be predicted by principal component 1 for all of its x-variables (response variables: 1 = GT; 2 = leaves). Mutual predictability for both data sets was demonstrated in Supplemental Dataset 4. Figure 4. MapMan overview of the transcriptomics of cellular metabolism in LA1777. The color scale (bottom right hand corner) corresponds to log2fold changes for trichome versus trichome-free leaves with red being significantly overexpressed in trichomes and blue overexpressed in leaves (p < 0.05, Fisher exact t-test). White squares: log2-fold changes between -1 and 1 or t-test p > 0.05). Figure 5 . Transcript profiles of genes involved in sucrose degradation and transport in tomato leaves and trichomes. A: cell wall invertases; B: cytosolic invertases; C: cytosolic sucrose synthases; D : invertase inhibitors; E: plastidic invertases; F sucrose symporter. Data presented are normalized fluorescence counts from the microarray data (see details in Supplemental Dataset 5). All leaf versus trichome differential expression within a species are significantly different (Student’s ttest p < 0.05) except those annotated by an asterisk *. Figure 6. Distribution of the 2000 most highly expressed genes in ontology groups in leaves, trichomes and trichomes versus leaves. In A (leaves) and B (trichomes), the 2000 most highly expressed genes were grouped according to Mapman ontology. The categories that represent less than 2% of the cumulative expression of these 2000 genes were grouped together under “other”. C: as in B, except the 2000 top expressed genes are those with a fold change in expression of over 2 in GTs versus leaves. For detailed information, see Supplemental Dataset 5. All data are based on the average of n=3 individual hybridizations per group. Figure 7. Cumulative transcript expression of photosynthesis genes. A) light reactions, B) carbon fixation and carbonic anhydrase. For details, see Supplemental Dataset 5, PS1 – photosystem I, PS2 - photosystem II. Figure 8. Time course after 13C-pulse labeling of LA1777 with 13C-CO2 and U13C-glucose. Panel A: 13C-CO2, panel B: U13C-Glucose in the presence of ambient CO2. Blue: total pool sizes of 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PGA), ribulose-1,5bisphosphate (RU-1,5-BP), and sucrose normalized to sample dry weight. Red: fraction of carbon labeled in these metabolites. Error bars represent the average ± s.d. (n=6). The fraction of labeled carbon represents the sum of all labeled C from all measured isotopologs. All the data have been corrected for the natural isotopic abundance of 13C-isotopes. Relative isotopolog abundances are presented in Supplemental Figure 8. Numbers above the red bars represent the relative 13C enrichment in the respective metabolites. Differences in the relative 13C-enrichment between leaf and trichome for a given time point are all significant based on heteroscedastic t-tests (p < 0.05) unless indicated by *. Figure 9. Expression map of the citrate-malate-pyruvate shuttle in GTs compared to leaves. Log2-fold changes between trichomes and trichome-free leaves of LA1777, relative transcript expressions (left boxes) and relative protein abundances (right boxes). Red indicates significant (p <0.05; t-test) overexpression in trichomes, blue significant overexpression (p < 0.05; t-test) in leaves, and white non-significant changes (p > 0.05 ; t-test). The subcellular localization of the respective enzymes was manually checked using the software tools listed in the Methods section. The horizontal blue bar represents the mitochondrial envelope and the yellow discs with dark blue circle the pyruvate-proton symporter (left) and the malate-citrate antiporter (right). cPK: cytosolic pyruvate kinase; PEPC: phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase; PEPCK: phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; cME: cytosolic malic enzyme; cMDH: cytosolic malate dehydrogenase; mMDH: mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase; mCS: mitochondrial citrate synthase; mPDH: mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase. Figure 10. A putative model of central carbon and energy metabolism in tomato GTs. The figure represents a type VI glandular cell with its plasma membrane as a black line. The three main compartments involved (chloroplast, cytosol, mitochondria) are indicated in blue. The yellow star represents the sun which emits light of photosynthetically active wavelengths (l). These allow the photosystems in thylakoid membranes (represented by stacks of green horizontal bars) to produce chemical energy (ATP) and reducing power (NADPH). Photosynthesis and metabolic activity are accompanied by the production of ROS which are detoxified by PUFAs and glutathione. CO2 is in red in reactions where it is released and in green in reactions where it is fixed. Black arrows between metabolites represent either metabolic pathways or reactions which are discussed in detail in the main text. Abreviations: AcCoA: Acetyl-CoA; C6: hexose; CBB Cycle: Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle; CIT: citrate; DMAPP: dimethylallyl diphosphate; GA3P: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; GSH: glutathione; IPP: isopentenyl diphosphate; MAL: malate; MEP: methylerythritol 4-phosphate pathway; MEV: mevalonate pathway; OA: oxaloacetate; OPP: oxidative pentose phosphate pathway; PUFAs: polyunsaturated fatty acids; PYR: pyruvate; Rib5P: ribulose-5-phosphate; ROS: reactive oxygen species. Multiomics of tomato glandular trichomes reveals distinct features of central carbon metabolism supporting high productivity of specialized metabolites Gerd Balcke, Stefan Bennewitz, Nick Bergau, Benedikt Athmer, Anja Henning, Petra Majovsky, José M. Jiménez-Gómez, Wolfgang Hoehenwarter and Alain F Tissier Plant Cell; originally published online April 13, 2017; DOI 10.1105/tpc.17.00060 This information is current as of June 17, 2017 Supplemental Data /content/suppl/2017/04/14/tpc.17.00060.DC1.html /content/suppl/2017/06/05/tpc.17.00060.DC2.html Permissions https://www.copyright.com/ccc/openurl.do?sid=pd_hw1532298X&issn=1532298X&WT.mc_id=pd_hw1532298 X eTOCs Sign up for eTOCs at: http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain CiteTrack Alerts Sign up for CiteTrack Alerts at: http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain Subscription Information Subscription Information for The Plant Cell and Plant Physiology is available at: http://www.aspb.org/publications/subscriptions.cfm © American Society of Plant Biologists ADVANCING THE SCIENCE OF PLANT BIOLOGY