* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download An immunocytochemical voyage throug the endomembrane system
Survey
Document related concepts
Biochemical switches in the cell cycle wikipedia , lookup
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup
Cell growth wikipedia , lookup
Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
An immunocytochemical voyage throug the endomembrane system of plant cells: from electrons to photons B. Satiat-Jeunemaitre”, C. Hawes+ and Spencer Brown*. * Institutdes Sciences V6g&ales, C.N.R.S., 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France. http://www.cnrs-gif.fr/ISV/ ’ Research School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, U.K. http://www.brookes.ac.uk/schools/bms/reseEirch/molcell/hawes/ Eukaryotic cells are characterised by the compartmentalisation of their cytoplasm. Biological studies of cell endomembranes have elucidated their specialised functions such as assembling, sorting, and transporting newly synthesized proteins, glycoproteins, and polysaccharides to their final destination for action, storage, deposition or degradation. The movement of macromolecules in membrane-bounded vesicles or even tubules appears to be a rapid and efficient mechanism for transfer between the various compartments in the secretory pathway. Some features of membrane biology are however specific to plants (1) and are currently being investigated in our laboratory. Both light and electron microscopy have been combined with immunocytochemistry to visualise and identify the components of endomembrane system and some of its associated regulatory proteins in various cell types. Immuno-“visualisation” of the plant endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus is currently performed by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy, in order to clarify the 3-D organisation of these compartments. Data confirm the earliest electron microscope studies suggesting that the architecture of the plant Golgi apparatus (GA) and its structural (and functional) relations with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) may vary with the cell type observed (2). Moreover, such versatility may also appear as a response to exogenous stress or physiological factors. We will illustrate this latter point by presenting immunocytochemistry describing (i) spontaneous variations of the 3-D organisation of the endomembrane system during cell proliferation, and (ii) experimental modifications of the ER/Golgi compartment by brefeldin A (BFA), a drug known to inhibit the exocytotic pathway (3). After comparison with observations in animal or yeast membrane biology, our results outline some plant specificities regarding the dynamics of the endomembrane system and the organisation of trafficking pathways. 1. Evolution of ER and Golgi Membranes in Proliferating Cells The 3D organisation of the ER and GA in proliferating monitored by confocal laser scanning microscopy. maize or tobacco cells has been In interphase cells, the ER ramifies throughout the cytoplasm and circumscribes the nucleus. In prophase, the ER surrounding the nucleus ,breaks down. During metaphase, there is a strong rearrangement of ER membranes as they concentrate in the polar area of the mitotic spindle, following a similar pattern usually described for microtubules. In anaphase, the ER seems to envelop the moving set of chromosomes, and concentrate at the future cell plate. In telophase, the phragmoplast is strongly marked by the ER. During interphase, the Golgi stacks are dispersed throughout the cytoplasm. At prophase, metaphase and anaphase, they are pushed away from the dividing nuclear zone. At late anaphase Golgi stacks migrate to the equatorial plane. At early telophase the phragmoplast is strongly mark by Go&derived membranes, while late telophase is characterised by an accumulation of Golgi units at the end of the growing cell plate. It is well known that ER and Golgi apparatus are the initial compartments involved in the secretory pathway. The clear dissociation of this arrangement during mitosis questions the functioning of the secretory pathway during this phase of the cell cycle. 2. BFA-induced Modifications Under BFA Multiparametric analyses of cytometry. It shows that the change in the total quantity proliferating cells. 3. Comparison treatment, plant Golgi stacks tend to gather and vesiculate (4). BFA-treated cells stained with a Golgi marker have been made by flow reorganisation of the GA observed at the cellular level is not linked to a of GA membranes. BFA-induced Golgi clusters are also described in with Animal Cells Structural differences between the plant GA and its animal counterpart are evident, notably distinct architecture throughout the cell and a different behavior during cytokinesis (5). However, data on the evolution of the endomembrane system along the cell cycle in tobacco cells, compared with literature data and our own experiments on HeLa cells, point out interesting similarities in the behaviour of Golgi membranes in the two systems despite the currently described differences: (i) The first step of disassembly of the GA in mitotic HeLa cells ressembles the GA in interphase plant cells; (ii) The homotypic fusion of GA-derived vesicles during the end of mitosis described in animal cells are occurring in plant cells too. However, in plant cells they do not lead to the formation of de novo Golgi stacks as in animal cells; instead they contribute to the building of a new cell structure, the cell plate, taking place between two daughter cells. (iii) Immunocytochemistry combined with flow cytometry shows that the major increment in Golgi membrane occurs in Gl phase, both in animal and plant cells. References 1. Gunning B. and Steer M., Plant Cell Biology. Jones and Barlett F’ublishers.(l996) 2. Hawes B. and Satiat-Jeunemaitre B. , Trends in Plant Sciences, 1, 395-401 (1996) 3. Satiat-Jeunemaitre B. et al., J. Microsc., 181, 162-167 (1996) 4. Satiat-Jeunemaitre B. and Hawes C., J. Cell Ski., 103, 1153-1166 (1992) 5. Warren G. and Wickner W. Cell 84, 395-400. (1996)