* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download A Histone H3.3-like Gene Specifically Expressed in the Vegetative
Survey
Document related concepts
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Biochemical cascade wikipedia , lookup
Expression vector wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Real-time polymerase chain reaction wikipedia , lookup
Silencer (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression wikipedia , lookup
Transcriptional regulation wikipedia , lookup
Secreted frizzled-related protein 1 wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup
Gene regulatory network wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Plant Cell Physiol. 46(8): 1299–1308 (2005) doi:10.1093/pcp/pci139, available online at www.pcp.oupjournals.org JSPP © 2005 A Histone H3.3-like Gene Specifically Expressed in the Vegetative Cell of Developing Lily Pollen Yaeko Sano * and Ichiro Tanaka Department of Biology, Graduate School of Integrated Science, Yokohama City University, Seto 22-2, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 2360027 Japan ; To investigate the progression of the cell cycle during pollen development, two clones of histone H3 genes, YAH3 and MPH3, were isolated from cDNA libraries of young anthers and mature pollen of Lilium longiflorum. Northern blot and reverse transcription–PCR (RT–PCR) analyses demonstrated that YAH3 transcripts were present in uninucleate microspores and generative cells at the postulated S phase of the cell cycle as well as in young anthers, meristematic root tips, and shoot apices that contained proliferating cells. YAH3 therefore appears to be a major type of histone H3 gene in the lily. In contrast, the expression of MPH3 was detected only during pollen development, and expression increased during the development of mid-bicellular pollen to mature pollen. The results of in situ hybridization revealed that the transcripts of MPH3 were specifically accumulated in the vegetative cell of developing bicellular pollen. The two histone H3s differed at eight amino acid positions, and the deduced amino acid sequence of MPH3 showed identity with histone H3.3, which is a replacement variant of histone H3. The localization of an MPH3–green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion protein differed from that of YAH3–GFP in onion epidermal cells and tobacco BY-2 cells at stationary phase, which suggests the preferential ability of MPH3 to be incorporated into chromatin. MPH3 may be expressed replication independently in vegetative cells at the G1 phase and be incorporated into highly active chromatin of the vegetative nucleus of bicellular pollen, in a manner similar to histone H3.3 in Drosophila. Keywords: Cell cycle — Histone H3.3 — Lilium longiflorum — Pollen development — Vegetative cell. Abbreviations: CaMV, cauliflower mosaic virus; DAPI, 4′,6diamidino-2-phenylindole; DIG, digoxigenin; GFP, green fluorescent protein; GN, generative nucleus; ORF, open reading frame; RT–PCR, reverse transcription–PCR; SN, sperm nucleus; UTR, untranslated region; VN, vegetative nucleus The nucleotide sequences reported in this paper have been submitted to the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database under the accession numbers AB195974 (MPH3) and AB195975 (YAH3). * Introduction Drastic changes in gene expression patterns occur during pollen development in flowering plants (Mascarenhas 1990, Becker et al. 2003, Honys and Twell 2003, McCormick 2004). In particular, recent microarray analyses in Arabidopsis have revealed unique characteristics of the pollen transcriptome (Becker et al. 2003, Honys and Twell 2003). Although there is a large overlap between the genes expressed in pollen and those expressed in sporophytic vegetative tissues, about 10– 40% of genes were detected specifically in pollen. To date, many pollen-specific genes have been identified. As the proteins encoded by these genes are involved in signal transduction and cell wall biosynthesis and regulation, it is assumed that these pollen-specific genes are expressed in the vegetative cell within pollen for pollen germination and tube growth. The transcripts in sperm cells within pollen have been analyzed in Nicotiana tabacum and Zea mays (Xu et al. 2002, Engel et al. 2003). This work showed gene expression profiles that differed from those of sporophytic vegetative tissues and pollen vegetative cells. Thus, the gene expression patterns in larger gametophytic vegetative cells differ from those in smaller gametic generative or sperm cells within pollen, as well as those in developing pollen differing from sporophytic vegetative tissues (Tanaka 1997). The differential gene expression between vegetative cells and generative or sperm cells may be due to differences in the configuration of their chromatin. Chromatin switches between an open state, which permits transcription, and a more closed state, which is transcriptionally inactive (reviewed by Fransz and de Jong 2002). A large-scale manifestation of the open or closed states is microscopically visible as diffused (open) or condensed (closed) chromatin. In general, the nucleus of a vegetative cell (referred to hereafter as the vegetative nucleus, VN) contains diffused chromatin, whereas the nucleus of each generative or sperm cell (referred to hereafter as the generative nucleus, GN, or sperm nucleus, SN, respectively) contains highly condensed chromatin (Tanaka 1993). The VN may therefore be more transcriptionally active than the GN or SN. We previously characterized the GN by the appearance of specific histone variants during pollen development in Lilium longiflorum (Ueda and Tanaka 1995a, Ueda and Tanaka 1995b). The expression of genes coding for these histone vari- Corresponding author: E-mail, [email protected]; Fax, +81-45-787-2217. 1299 1300 Pollen-specific histone H3 gene in Lilium Fig. 1 Alignment of nucleotide sequences of YAH3 (upper; accession No. AB195975) and MPH3 (lower; accession No. AB195974). Identical nucleotides are indicated by asterisks. Open reading frames are shaded. ants (gH2A, gH2B and gH3) occurs specifically in generative cells with highly condensed chromatin (Ueda et al. 2000). Xu et al. (1999) also reported generative cell-specific expression of similar H2A and H3 histone genes in L. longiflorum. Thus, histones may be one of the key factors for specific gene expression during pollen development. However, few studies have investigated the expression of histone genes during pollen development. Raghavan (1989) and Raghavan et al. (1992) examined the expression of the histone H3 gene during pollen development in rice and henbane and found that the transcripts reached a maximum in mature pollen and were distributed uniformly in the cytoplasm of both the generative and vegetative cells. This observation is contrary to the common belief that histone H3 genes are specifically up-regulated during S phase of the cell cycle because neither type of cell within mature pollen ever synthesizes DNA. For this reason, we isolated histone H3 genes from young anthers and mature pollen of Lilium and examined their temporal and spatial expression. The developmental process of lily pollen is highly synchronized, and successive stages can easily be estimated from the length of the buds on the plant. As a result, we isolated a homolog of histone H3.3, which was a variant of histone H3 that was deposited in active chromatin in a replication-independent manner in Drosophila (Ahmad and Henikoff 2002a), and it was detected specifically in the vegetative cells. This novel observation may be the first characterization of active VN chromatin. Results Two histone H3 genes isolated from young anthers and mature pollen Two cDNA clones of histone H3 were obtained by hybridization screening of cDNA libraries of young anthers and mature pollen and were designated YAH3 and MPH3, respectively. The nucleotide sequences of YAH3 and MPH3 are shown in Fig. 1. Both sequences have predicted open reading frames (ORFs) of 408 bp encoding 136 residue proteins including the initial methionine. They showed high homology to each other in the ORF region (82.8%) and lower homology in the untranslated region (UTR). Compared with the maize histone H3 gene (H3C2; accession No. M13378), which was used as the probe for library screening, YAH3 shows 84.3% identity and MPH3 shows 79.9% identity in the ORF region (data not shown). Temporal expression of YAH3 and MPH3 during pollen development and tissue specificity Northern blot analysis was performed to examine the temporal expression of the two genes using total RNA samples extracted from cells at various stages during microspore and pollen development (Fig. 2). YAH3 was strongly expressed in anthers from buds 10 mm in length and in microsporocytes from buds 20 mm in length. After the meiotic division, bicellular pollen from 70 and 80 mm buds after the first microspore mitosis and uninucleate microspores from 50 and 60 mm buds before the first microspore mitosis also exhibited YAH3 expres- Pollen-specific histone H3 gene in Lilium Fig. 2 Northern blot analysis of Lilium histone H3 transcripts. Total RNA (10 µg per lane) samples were extracted from anthers from 10 mm buds (10); microsporocytes from 20 mm buds (20); uninucleate microspores from 30 (30), 40 (40), 50 (50) and 60 mm (60) buds; bicellular pollen from 70 (70), 80 (80), 90 (90), 100 (100), 120 (120), 150 (150) and 170 mm (170) buds; and from mature pollen (MP). RNA was electrophoresed, stained with ethidium bromide (rRNA), blotted, and probed with YAH3 or MPH3. sion. However, the expression was stopped in bicellular pollen in buds beyond 90 mm in length. On the other hand, a weak MPH3 signal was detected in bicellular pollen from 120 mm buds. The signal became stronger during pollen maturation, although a weak signal was also detected in uninucleate microspores from 50 and 60 mm buds. Reverse transcription–PCR (RT–PCR) analysis was performed on the developing bicellular pollen and other tissues (Fig. 3). YAH3 was expressed in bicellular pollen from both 70 and 80 mm buds and was also expressed in root tips, shoot apices, young leaves and ovules. The MPH3 signal was greater in mature pollen than in mid-bicellular pollen (120 mm buds), as shown by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 3). The signal was not detected in other tissues including stems and bulbs. Thus, the results of RT–PCR analysis of the expression of both histone H3 genes during pollen development were similar to those of Northern blot analysis. The expression of MPH3 was also pollen specific. Localization of YAH3 and MPH3 transcripts in bicellular pollen To investigate the location of the expression of YAH3 and MPH3 within bicellular pollen, in situ hybridization was performed (Fig. 4, 5). In early bicellular pollen, soon after the first 1301 microspore mitosis, the generative cell was located at one pole (Fig. 4f). The YAH3 hybridization signal was detected in the pole (Fig. 4a). When a hybridized section was stained for DNA with methyl green, the signal surrounded the GN (Fig. 4k). The generative cell seemed to be pressed against the pole at this stage. No signal was observed in mid-bicellular pollen whose generative cell was detached from the pole and was rounded (Fig. 4b, c). A signal was also undetectable in late bicellular pollen and mature pollen, whose generative cells were spindle shaped and yellow (Fig. 4d, e). Thus, the YAH3 signal was only detected in generative cells from 75 mm buds and was never detected in vegetative cells during pollen development. Figure 5 shows the results of in situ hybridization with MPH3 probes. In the case of the 3′-UTR of MPH3, no hybridization signal was detected in early bicellular pollen (Fig. 5a, b). A weak signal was first detected in the cytoplasm of the vegetative cell of mid-bicellular pollen from 120 mm buds (Fig. 5c). It became stronger in the vegetative cells of late bicellular (Fig. 5d) and mature pollen (Fig. 5e). Fig. 5k shows a section of late bicellular pollen probed with antisense 3′-UTR of MPH3 and counterstained with methyl green. A yellow area around the green GN showed no hybridization signal (Fig. 5k). This was more obvious in broken pollen whose spindle-shaped generative cell showed no hybridization signal (Fig. 5l). In contrast, the hybridization signal of gH3, which is a GN-specific histone H3 gene (Ueda and Tanaka 1995a, Ueda and Tanaka 1995b), was detected around the GN or in the cytoplasm of the generative cell within late bicellular pollen (Fig. 5m). Moreover, the hybridization signal in the case of the ORF of MPH3 was detected in the cytoplasm of both vegetative and generative cells (Fig. 5n, o). In contrast to Fig. 5l, the generative cell of broken pollen showed a strong hybridization signal (Fig. 5o). These results suggest that MPH3 is specifically expressed in vegetative cells and not in generative cells. Both MPH3 and gH3 were never expressed in generative cells within early bicellular pollen from 75 mm buds, where YAH3 was expressed (data not shown). Thus, the temporal and spatial expression patterns differed among the three kinds of histone H3 genes. Fig. 3 RT–PCR analysis of Lilium histone H3 transcripts. cDNAs were synthesized with total RNA samples from bicellular pollen from 70 (70), 80 (80), 90 (90), 100 (100), 120 (120), 150 (150) and 170 mm (170) buds; mature pollen (MP); root tips (Rt); shoot apex (Sa); young leaves (Yl); old leaves (Ol); stems (St); bulbs (Bu); and ovules (Ov), and used as a template for PCR with gene-specific primers of YAH3, MPH3 or EF1-α. EF1-α was used as an internal control. 1302 Pollen-specific histone H3 gene in Lilium Fig. 4 In situ hybridization analysis of YAH3 expression during pollen development. Bicellular pollen from 75 (a and f), 90 (b and g), 120 (c and h) and 150 mm (d and i) buds and mature pollen (MP; e and j) were sectioned. Each section was hybridized with an antisense probe (a, b, c, d and e) or sense probe (f, g, h, i and j) of the 3′-UTR of YAH3. (k) A section of bicellular pollen from a 75 mm bud that was hybridized with an antisense probe of YAH3 and counterstained with methyl green. G, generative cell; V, vegetative cell. Scale bar: 20 µm. Fig. 5 In situ hybridization analysis of MPH3 expression during bicellular pollen development. Bicellular pollen from 75 (a and f), 90 (b and g), 120 (c and h) and 150 mm (d and i) buds and mature pollen (MP; e and j) were sectioned. Each section was hybridized with an antisense probe (a, b, c, d and e) or sense probe (f, g, h, i and j) of the 3′ UTR of MPH3. (k–o) Sections of bicellular pollen from 150 mm buds hybridized with an antisense probe of the 3′-UTR of MPH3 (k and l), the ORF of gH3 (m) and the ORF of MPH3 (n and o), and counterstained with methyl green. G, generative cell; V, vegetative cell. Scale bar: 20 µm. Pollen-specific histone H3 gene in Lilium 1303 Fig. 6 (A) Alignment of deduced amino acid sequences of MPH3 and YAH3 of Lilium longiflorum and histone H3.3s and histone H3.1s of Arabidopsis thaliana and Drosophila melanogaster. Residues varying between the two sequences from the same species are indicated with black backgrounds. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of amino acid sequences of histone H3 variants in plants (Lilium, Arabidopsis and Medicago) and Drosophila. The accession numbers were as follows: Drosophila H3.1 (AB019400), Drosophila H3.3 (X82257), Arabidopsis H3.1 (M35387), Medicago H3.1 (X13674), Arabidopsis H3.3 (X60429) and Medicago H3.2 (U09465). Numbers above branches are the bootstrap values. MPH3 is similar to plant histone H3.3 The deduced amino acid sequences of the two lily H3s were 93.4% similar over their entire length, differing at eight residues (Fig. 6A). A homology search showed that the deduced amino acid sequence of MPH3 showed homology with Arabidopsis histone H3.3-like protein or histone H3.III (referred to hereafter as Arabidopsis histone H3.3), a replacement histone H3 variant of Arabidopsis thaliana, while YAH3 showed homology with the major histone type of Arabidopsis H3.1 or H3.I (referred to hereafter as Arabidopsis histone H3.1). The eight residues that differed between MPH3 and YAH3 include the four residues (position 32, 42, 88 and 91) that differ between histone H3.3 and H3.1 of Arabidopsis. Moreover, among these four residues, three (position 32, 88 and 91) correspond to three of the four positions (32, 88, 90 and 91) that differ between H3.3 and H3.1 of Drosophila (Fig. 6A). Phylogenetic analysis of amino acid sequences indicated that MPH3 is grouped with Arabidopsis histone H3.3 and Medicago histone H3.2 (a kind of histone H3.3), while YAH3 is grouped with major histone H3.1 of plant species (Fig. 6B). MPH3–green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion proteins preferentially localized in chromatin of onion epidermal cells and tobacco BY-2 cells Among the eight residues that differed between MPH3 and YAH3, seven (except for position 32) were in the histone fold domain, which is necessary for the formation of histone octamers (Fig. 6A). To investigate the ability of the histones to become incorporated into chromatin, we constructed fusion genes encoding each H3 histone and GFP under the control of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoters. These constructs were introduced into onion epidermal cells and tobacco BY-2 cells using a particle gun, and the localization of transiently expressed fusion proteins was investigated (Fig. 7). When a GFP gene alone was introduced into onion epidermal cells, GFP-derived fluorescence was observed in the cyto- 1304 Pollen-specific histone H3 gene in Lilium Fig. 7 Expression of histone H3–GFP fusion proteins in onion epidermal cells (a–c) and tobacco BY-2 cells (d–l). GFP (a, d, g and j), MPH3– GFP (b, e, h and k) and YAH3–GFP (c, f, i and l) were introduced into cells by particle bombardment. BY-2 cells were counterstained with DAPI. GFP signal (d, c and f), fluorescence from DAPI (g, h and i), and of the GFP signal viewed under a light microscope (a, b, c, j, k and l). Arrows indicate nucleoli. Scale bars: 20 µm. plasm as well as in the nucleus (Fig. 7a). In contrast, the MPH3–GFP signal was only observed at the nucleus (Fig. 7b). On the other hand, YAH3–GFP showed nuclear localization with a distinct preference for nucleolus (Fig. 7c). Thus, the nuclear localization of MPH3 and YAH3 was different in the introduced cells. This was ascertained further in tobacco BY-2 cells at the stationary phase whose nucleoli were distinct by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining (Fig. 7d–l). Similarly to onion epidermal cells, BY-2 cells showed the GFP fluorescence both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus when a GFP gene alone was introduced (Fig. 7d, g). In contrast, the MPH3–GFP signal corresponds to DAPI fluorescence in BY-2 cells (Fig. 7e, h). On the other hand, the strong YAH3–GFP signal localized at a part of the nucleus where DAPI did not stain (Fig. 7f, i). Thus, while YAH3–GFP mainly localized at the nucleolus, MPH3–GFP localized in the chromatin domain in BY-2 cells at the stationary phase. Discussion Cell cycle progression during pollen development During microspore and pollen development in angiosperms, DNA synthesis occurs twice: once in the uninucleate microspore after meiotic division and once in the generative cell within bicellular pollen. In L. longiflorum, the two DNA synthesis events occur just before and just after the first microspore mitosis (Taylor and McMaster 1954, Tanaka et al. 1979). The occurrence of DNA synthesis during pollen development has also been reported in other plant species (Zarsky et al. 1992, Binarova et al. 1993). On the other hand, histones are generally synthesized during DNA synthesis (S phase). In this study, the expression of YAH3 intimately depended on the presence of proliferating cells or S-phase cells (Fig. 3). YAH3 was highly expressed in meristematic root tips, shoot apices, young leaves and ovules. We presumed that young leaves also contained proliferating cells, while old leaves stopped cell proliferation. Ovule also contained proliferating somatic cells surrounding an embryo sac. Therefore, we assume that YAH3 is the usual somatic type of histone H3 gene, which is expressed replication dependently. The fact that YAH3 showed homology with Arabidopsis histone H3.1 (Fig. 6), the major type of histone H3, also supports the conclusion that YAH3 is a major type of histone H3 of L. longiflorum. The samples from 10 and 20 mm buds also showed high levels of expression of YAH3 (Fig. 2). The pre-meiotic anthers from 10 mm buds probably contained proliferating endothecium, and microsporocytes from 20 mm buds were contaminated with proliferating tapetum cells. Pollen-specific histone H3 gene in Lilium Under the conditions in our greenhouse, the first microspore mitosis occurred in uninucleate microspores from 65 mm buds. YAH3 was expressed in uninucleate microspores in 50– 60 mm buds and in bicellular pollen in 70–80 mm buds (Fig. 2), suggesting that they were in S phase. Furthermore, the result of in situ hybridization of bicellular pollen from 75 mm buds with the YAH3 signal in the cytoplasm of the poleattached generative cell (Fig. 4a, k) strongly suggests that the generative cells at this stage are in S phase, because the GN begins DNA synthesis while attached to the plasma membrane of the generative pole just after microspore mitosis (Tanaka and Ito 1984, Tanaka 1997). From the results of this study, we conclude that the uninucleate microspores in 50–60 mm buds and the generative cells within bicellular pollen in 70–80 mm buds were in S phase. Accordingly, the generative cells within bicellular pollen in buds >90 mm are in G2 phase. MPH3 is expressed in the vegetative cells at G1 phase In contrast to YAH3, MPH3 was specifically expressed during pollen development (Fig. 3). Neither somatic tissue nor ovules, the female reproductive organs, expressed MPH3. The expression of MPH3 increased during the development of midbicellular pollen (buds 120 mm in length) to mature pollen. The vegetative cell is in G1 (or G0) phase for its entire life. During the interval, the generative cell is at G2 phase, as described above. Therefore, it is apparent that MPH3, unlike YAH3, is a replication-independent histone H3 gene. Ueda et al. (2000) found another histone H3 variant gene, gH3, which is also pollen specific. The temporal gene expression pattern of gH3 during pollen development is similar to that of MPH3. Although both are expressed in a replication-independent manner, the spatial expression patterns of the two histone H3 genes are quite distinct. The transcripts of MPH3 were accumulated in the vegetative cells of developing bicellular pollen (Fig. 5c, d, e, k, l), while the transcripts of gH3 were specifically accumulated in the generative cell of late bicellular pollen (Fig. 5m). In rice and henbane, the transcripts of the histone H3 gene reach a maximum in mature pollen and are distributed uniformly in the cytoplasm of both generative and vegetative cells (Raghavan 1989, Raghavan et al. 1992). The probe used in these studies is a 1.3 kb genomic clone of rice histone H3 (accession No. M15664), which showed 85.5% identity with YAH3, and 80.4% identity with MPH3 in the ORF region. This may allow for the detection of histone H3 gene expression, such as MPH3 and gH3, together. Indeed, when an ORF sequence of MPH3 with lower specificity was used as a probe, both cell types showed hybridization signals (Fig. 5n, o). Therefore, MPH3 is the first histone H3 gene to be identified that is specifically expressed in vegetative cells in G1 phase. Some histone H3 variants are expressed outside of the S phase, including H3(P) of the ciliated protozoan Euplotes (Jahn et al. 1997, Ghosh and Klobutcher 2000), which is not expressed in proliferating cells but only in cells during sexual phase. Other histone H3 variants, Cid and H3.3 in Drosophila, 1305 are also expressed outside of S phase (Ahmad and Henikoff 2002b). While the S phase-specific major type of histone H3 provides the bulk of nucleosome assembly when the genome is duplicated, the replication-independent histone H3 variants may also have the ability to be incorporated into non-replicating chromatin. To investigate the chromatin incorporation of MPH3, GFP expression vectors were introduced into onion epidermal cells in G1 phase and tobacco BY-2 cells at stationary phase. MPH3–GFP localized at the whole chromatin domain in the nucleus. In contrast, there was clear preferential staining of nucleoli with YAH3–GFP (Fig. 7). Such a tendency has been observed in other transiently expressed replicationdependent histones (unpublished data). Alternatively, the result suggests that MPH3 may easily be incorporated into the chromatin of G1 cells. MPH3 may play a role in the transcriptional activity of VN The deduced amino acid sequence of MPH3 showed identity with histone H3.3, which is a replacement variant of histone H3 (Fig. 6). The variant histone H3.3 is nearly identical to major histone H3.1, differing at only a few amino acid positions (Hendzel and Davie 1990, Ahmad and Henikoff 2002b, Tagami et al. 2004). In recent years, plant H3.3-like genes have been found in A. thaliana (Chaubet et al. 1992, Chaubet-Gigot et al. 2001), Medicago sativa (Kapros et al. 1992, Robertson et al. 1996) and in some other plants. Among the eight residues which differ between MPH3 and YAH3, positions 32, 88 and 91 differ between histone H3 and histone H3.3-like protein in many other species in addition to Arabidopsis and Drosophila (Wells et al. 1986). The difference in position 42 was also observed in Arabidopsis histone H3s, and that in position 79 was observed in Tetrahymena histone H3s (Thatcher et al. 1994). The remaining three residues only showed difference among species but not between histone H3s in the same species. The expression pattern of MPH3, however, is distinct from those of histone H3.3 genes of other plants. For example, Arabidopsis H3.3 genes do not show preferential expression in reproductive tissues such as developing pollen (Chaubet et al. 1992). Although Drosophila H3.3A shows strong expression in the testes (Akhmanova et al. 1995), histone H3.3 genes in other species show very little specific expression in reproductive tissues. In Drosophila, histone H3.3 is deposited in active chromatin, while the major type of histone H3.1 is incorporated strictly into newly formed nucleosomes during DNA replication (Ahmad and Henikoff 2002a). Such a difference in chromatin incorporation may be due to differences in amino acid residues. Three of four amino acid residues that differ between H3.3 and H3.1 in Drosophila correspond to three of eight that differ between MPH3 and YAH3 (Fig. 6A). The result of the introduction of a GFP fusion protein (Fig. 7) suggests the incorporation of MPH3 into non-replicating chromatin. The vegetative cell in which MPH3 transcripts accumulate is a terminal cell that does not undergo further mitotic divi- 1306 Pollen-specific histone H3 gene in Lilium sion in vivo. The vegetative cell is transcriptionally active in order to produce a large amount of materials that are involved in pollen maturation, germination and tube growth. For this reason, the chromatin of the VN is largely diffused. Histone H1 gradually decreases in the VN after microspore mitosis, and the VN in mature pollen contains little histone H1 in the lily (Tanaka et al. 1998). Such a low level of the linker histone may place the chromatin of VN into a diffuse and transcriptionally active state such that MPH3 transcripts are accumulated in the vegetative cell. Consequently, MPH3 may be incorporated into the active VN chromatin, as in Drosophila H3.3, and play a role in the maintenance of the transcriptional activity. To investigate this possibility, we are currently generating an antibody against the specific amino acid sequence of MPH3 and are examining the localization in bicellular pollen. Materials and Methods Plant materials Lily (L. longiflorum cv. Hinomoto) plants were grown in a greenhouse. The various stages of pollen development in the lily can easily be estimated from the length of the buds. Under our greenhouse conditions, meiotic division and the first microspore mitosis occur in buds that are about 13–27 and 65 mm in length, respectively. Therefore, anthers at pre-meiotic interphase were obtained from 10 mm buds, while microsporocytes at meiotic prophase I were collected from 15 and 20 mm buds. The uninucleate microspores were obtained from 30, 40, 50 and 60 mm buds, and the bicellular pollen was collected from 70, 75, 80, 90, 100, 120, 150 and 170 mm buds. Mature pollen and ovules were collected from the dehiscent anthers and ovaries of flowers 3 d after anthesis. Root tips, shoot apices, young and old leaves, stems and bulbs were collected from the lily plants. Onion bulbs were purchased in a store. The tobacco BY-2 (N. tabacum L. cv. Bright Yellow 2) suspension cells were maintained by weekly subculturing in Murashige and Skoog’s medium at 27°C in the dark. The BY-2 cells at stationary phase were obtained 10 d after subculture. Isolation of RNA Cells and tissues were frozen, ground to a powder in liquid nitrogen, and then lysed in a buffer containing 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 100 mM LiCl and 1% SDS. The subsequent isolation procedure was carried out using the SDS–phenol method (Shirzadegan et al. 1991), and the materials were precipitated with lithium chloride. Total RNA samples were treated with DNase I (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) to remove contaminating genomic DNA. Poly(A)+ RNA samples for cDNA libraries were purified using the Oliotex™-dT30<Super> mRNA Purification kit (TAKARA BIO INC., Otsu, Japan). Hybridization screening A cDNA library was constructed using poly(A)+ RNA of either young anthers obtained from 15 mm buds or mature pollen with a cDNA Library Construction System (Novagen, Madison, WI, USA). Hybridization screening of both the young anther and mature pollen cDNA libraries was performed using a digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled probe of the histone H3 sequence, which was obtained by PCR from cDNA of lily root tips with primers 5′-CGCAAGCAGCTGGCCACCAA-3′ and 5′-GCGAGCTGGATGTCCTTGGG-3′ corresponding to the ORF region of maize histone H3 (H3C2; accession No. M13378). Positive plaques were isolated, and the nucleotide sequences were determined using a BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with a DNA sequencer (ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer; Applied Biosystems). Database searches were performed using the BLAST and FASTA algorithms (http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp). The amino acid sequences of histone H3 were aligned using a program in GENETYX software. Then a phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining (NJ) method. Bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replications was performed. Northern blot analysis A 10 µg aliquot of total RNA was separated in a 1% agarose gel in the presence of 2.2 M formaldehyde and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The RNA was then transferred to a nylon membrane (Hybond-N; Amersham Bioscience, Piscataway, NJ, USA), and the membrane was baked at 80°C for 2 h. DIG-labeled DNA probes were prepared by PCR with a DIG-labeling (Roche) kit using the 3′-UTR sequences of YAH3 and MPH3 as templates. The RNA was hybridized overnight at 50°C in a buffer containing the DNA probes. The membrane was washed once in 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS at room temperature for 10 min and twice in 0.5× SSC, 0.1% SDS at 55°C for 15 min. The hybridization signals were detected using CSPD (chemiluminescent substrates for alkaline phosphatase; Roche) as instructed by the manufacturer. RT–PCR analysis First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed in 20 µl of reaction mixture containing 5 µg of total RNA, 50 pmol of oligo(dT) (18mer) primer, 10 nmol of dNTP mixture and 4 U of AMV reverse transcriptase (TAKARA BIO INC.). The reaction mixture was incubated at 42°C for 50 min and stopped by heating at 70°C for 15 min. After the reaction, the solution was diluted 1 : 10 with distilled water, and aliquots of 1 µl were added to 50 µl of PCR solution containing the gene-specific primers. The conditions for PCR were as follows: 94°C for 5 min, followed by cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, with an additional extension step at 72°C for 5 min. The number of cycles and the annealing temperature were changed for each gene as follows: 35 cycles and 60°C for MPH3, 32 cycles and 56°C for YAH3, and 28 cycles and 57°C for EF1-α. The gene-specific primers 5′-CTAATTCGTCTGTTATTGTG-3′ and 5′AAGCTTTTGTTTCGCGAGAA-3′ for the 3′-UTR region of MPH3, 5′-CGAGAGGGCTTGAGCATG-3′ and 5′-AACCCTACATATTCGCAAG-3′ for the 3′-UTR region of YAH3, and 5′-GAGGCAGACTGTTGCTGTCGG-3′ and 5′-AGCAGACTGAAATGAAGATGC-3′ for EF1α were used. PCR products were resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis or polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. In situ hybridization Cells were fixed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 4% paraformaldehyde for 2–6 h and were then dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, placed in xylene and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections 7–15 µm thick were placed on a slide coated with 3- aminopropyltriethoxysilane (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). The sections were dewaxed in xylene, hydrated in a graded ethanol series, treated with proteinase K, hydrolyzed in 0.2 M HCl, 0.25% acetic anhydride, and dehydrated in a graded ethanol series. DIG-UTP-labeled sense and antisense RNA probes were prepared with a DIG-RNA labeling kit (Roche) using the 3′-UTR sequences of YAH3 and MPH3 and the ORF sequence of MPH3 and gH3 as templates. The sections were hybridized overnight at 50°C in a buffer containing the RNA probes. The slides were washed in 50% formamide in 2× SSC at 50°C, treated with RNase A at 30°C, and washed in 2× SSC and then 0.2× SSC at 50°C. Pollen-specific histone H3 gene in Lilium Hybridization signals were detected using an NBT–BCIP mixture as described by the manufacturer (Roche). For staining of DNA, the slides were counterstained with 0.3% methyl green solution for 5 min. The sections were observed using bright field microscopy. Construction of GFP expression vectors The CaMV 35S-sGFP(S65T)-NOS plasmid (Chiu et al. 1996) was kindly provided by Dr. Y. Niwa of the Prefectural University of Shizuoka. The plasmid was digested with SalI and NcoI. The MPH3 gene was obtained by PCR amplification of cDNA using primers that introduce SalI and NcoI sites (5′-GGGTCGACATGGCCCGTACGAAGCAGACT-3′ and 5′-CATGCCATGGAGGCACGCTCGCCACGGAT-3′). The YAH3 gene was obtained by PCR amplification of cDNA using primers that introduce SalI and NcoI sites (5′-GGGTCGACATGGCCCGCACCAAGCAGAC-3′ and 5′-CATGCCATGGAAGCCCTCTCGCCGCGGAT-3′). The conditions for PCR were as follows: 94°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 68°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, with an additional extension step at 72°C for 5 min. Both PCR products were digested with SalI and NcoI and subcloned into the CaMV35S-sGFP(S65T)-NOS plasmid. Particle bombardment Onion epidermal cells and tobacco BY-2 cells were placed on an agar gel containing Murashige and Skoog’s medium. Plasmid DNA was introduced into the cells using a particle gun (PDS-1000/He; BIORAD, Hercules, CA, USA). The conditions for bombardment were a vacuum of 28 inches Hg, helium pressure of 1,100–1,350 p.s.i., and a target distance of 6–9 cm using 1.6 µm of gold microcarrier. After bombardment, cells were incubated for 4 h to overnight at 27°C in the dark. Then, cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde and viewed under blue-light irradiation to monitor fluorescence from GFP. They were also counterstained with DAPI. Acknowledgments The authors thank Dr. K. Ueda (Akita Prefectural University) for kindly providing the gH3 clone, Dr. Y. Niwa (Shizuoka Prefectural University) for kindly providing the GFP plasmid, Ms. K. Yanagihashi for technical support, and Dr. H. Shiota and Dr. N. Mogami (Yokohama City University) for helpful advice. This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for research from the Yokohama Academic Foundation to Y.S and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (project number 16570057 to I.T). References Ahmad, K. and Henikoff, S. (2002a) The histone variant H3.3 marks active chromatin by replication-independent nucleosome assembly. Mol. Cell 9: 1191–1200. Ahmad, K. and Henikoff, S. (2002b) Histone H3 variants specify modes of chromatin assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99: 16477–16484. Akhmanova, A.S., Bindels, P.C., Xu, J., Miedema, K., Kremer, H. and Hennig, W. (1995) Structure and expression of histone H3.3 genes in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila hydei. Genome 38: 586–600. Becker, J.D., Boavida, L.C., Carneiro, J., Haury, M. and Feijo, J.A. (2003) Transcriptional profiling of Arabidopsis tissues reveals the unique characteristics of the pollen transcriptome. Plant Physiol. 133: 713–725. Binarova, P., Straatman, K., Hause, G. and van Lammeren, A.A.M. (1993) Nuclear DNA synthesis during the induction of embryogenesis in cultured microspores and pollen of Brassica napus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 9–16. Chaubet, N., Clement, B. and Gigot, C. (1992) Genes encoding a histone H3.3like variant in Arabidopsis contain intervening sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 225: 569–574. 1307 Chaubet-Gigot, N., Kapros, T., Flenet, M., Kahn, K., Gigot, C. and Waterborg, J.H. (2001) Tissue-dependent enhancement of transgene expression by introns of replacement histone H3 genes of Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 45: 17–30. Chiu, W., Niwa, Y., Zeng W., Hirano, T., Kobayashi, H. and Sheen, J. (1996) Engineered GFP as a vital reporter in plants. Curr. Biol. 6: 325–330. Engel, M.L., Chaboud, A., Dumas, C. and McCormick, S. (2003) Sperm cells of Zea mays have a complex complement of mRNAs. Plant J. 34: 697–707. Fransz, P.F. and de Jong, J.H. (2002) Chromatin dynamics in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5: 560–567. Ghosh, S. and Klobutcher, L.A. (2000) A development-specific histone H3 localizes to the developing macronucleus of Euplotes. Genesis 26: 179–188. Hendzel, M.J. and Davie, J.R. (1990) Nucleosomal histones of transcriptionally active component chromatin preferentially exchange with newly synthesized histones in quiescent chicken erythrocytes. Biochem. J. 271: 67–73. Honys, D. and Twell, D. (2003) Comparative analysis of the Arabidopsis pollen transcriptome. Plant Physiol. 132: 640–652. Jahn, C.L., Ling, Z., Tebeau, C.M. and Klobutcher, L.A. (1997) An unusual histone H3 specific for early macronuclear development in Euplotes crassus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94: 1332–1337. Kapros, T., Bogre, L., Nemeth, K., Bako, L., Gyorgyey, J., Wu, S.C. and Dudits, D. (1992) Differential expression of histone H3 gene variants during cell cycle and somatic embryogenesis in alfalfa. Plant Physiol. 98: 621–625. Mascarenhas, J.P. (1990) Gene activity during pollen development. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 41: 317–338. McCormick, S. (2004) Control of male gametophyte development. Plant Cell 16 Suppl: S142–S153. Raghavan, V. (1989) mRNAs and a cloned histone gene are differentially expressed during anther and pollen development in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Cell Sci. 92: 217–229. Raghavan, V., Jiang, C. and Bimal, R. (1992) Cell- and tissue-specific expression of rice histone gene transcripts during anther and pollen development in henbane (Hyoscyamus niger). Amer. J. Bot. 79: 778–783. Robertson, A.J., Kapros, T., Dudits, D. and Waterborg, J.H. (1996) Identification of three highly expressed replacement histone H3 genes of alfalfa. DNA Seq. 6: 137–146. Shirzadegan, M., Christie, P. and Seemann, J.R. (1991) An efficient method for isolation of RNA from tissue cultured plant cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 19: 6055. Tagami, H., Ray-Gallet, D., Almouzni, G. and Nakatani, Y. (2004) Histone H3.1 and H3.3 complexes mediate nucleosome assembly pathways dependent or independent of DNA synthesis. Cell 116: 51–61. Tanaka, I. (1993) Development of male gametes in flowering plants. J. Plant Res. 106: 55–63. Tanaka, I. (1997) Differentiation of generative and vegetative cells in angiosperm pollen. Sex. Plant Reprod. 10: 1–7. Tanaka, I. and Ito, M. (1984) Cytogenetical studies on pollen development. I. On the mechanism of formation of generative nucleus (sperm nuclei) (in Japanese with English summary). Jpn. J. Palynol. 30: 9–16. Tanaka, I., Ono, K. and Fukuda, T. (1998) The developmental fate of angiosperm pollen is associated with a preferential decrease in the level of histone H1 in the vegetative nucleus. Planta 206: 561–569. Tanaka, I., Taguchi, T. and Ito, M. (1979) Studies on microspore development in Liliaceous plants. 1. The duration of the cell cycle and developmental aspects in lily microspore. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 92: 291–298. Taylor, J.H. and McMaster, R.D. (1954) Autoradiographic and microphotometric studies of desoxyribose nucleic acid during microgametogenesis in Lilium longiflorum. Chromosoma 6S: 489–521. Thatcher, T.H., MacGaffey, J., Bowen, J., Horowitz, S., Shapiro, D.L. and Gorovsky, M.A. (1994) Independent evolutionary origin of histone H3.3-like variants of animals and Tetrahymena. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 180–186. Ueda, K., Kinoshita, Y., Xu, Z.J., Ide, N., Ono, M., Akahori, Y., Tanaka, I. and Inoue, M. (2000) Unusual core histones specifically expressed in male gametic cells of Lilium longiflorum. Chromosoma 108: 491–500. Ueda, K. and Tanaka, I. (1995a) The appearance of male gamete-specific histones gH2B and gH3 during pollen development in Lilium longiflorum. Dev. Biol. 169: 210–217. Ueda, K. and Tanaka, I. (1995b) Male gametic nucleus-specific H2B and H3 histones, designated gH2B and gH3, in Lilium longiflorum. Planta 197: 289– 295. 1308 Pollen-specific histone H3 gene in Lilium Wells, D., Bains, W. and Kedes, L. (1986) Codon usage in histone gene families of higher eukaryotes reflects functional rather than phylogenetic relationship. J. Mol. Evol. 23: 224–241. Xu, H., Swoboda, I., Bhalla, P.L. and Singh, M.B. (1999) Male gametic cellspecific expression of H2A and H3 histone genes. Plant Mol. Biol. 39: 607– 614. Xu, H., Weterings, K., Vriezen, W., Feron, R., Xue, Y., Derksen, J. and Mariani, C. (2002) Isolation and characterization of male-germ-cell transcripts in Nicotiana tabacum. Sex. Plant Reprod. 14: 339–346. Zarsky, V., Garrido, D., Rihova, L., Tupy, J., Vicente, O. and Heberle-Bors, E. (1992) Derepression of the cell cycle by starvation is involved in the induction of tobacco pollen embryogenesis. Sex. Plant Reprod. 5: 189–194. (Received January 23, 2005; Accepted May 23, 2005)