* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Global Warming: Basic Definitions
Climate change in the Arctic wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Myron Ebell wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Michael E. Mann wikipedia , lookup
Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Physical impacts of climate change wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Global Warming Answer the following questions without looking up the answers: 1. Describe in your own words what global warming means. 2. How does the greenhouse effect fit into global warming? 3. You've seen that science can sometimes be misrepresented in the media. List some reasons why this can happen. 4. Do you think it's a problem when science is misrepresented in the media? Why or why not? Does your answer depend on what the consequences might be? 5. Before you proceed to the following lessons, write a brief paragraph explaining your thoughts on global warming. What did you know about it before you started this lesson? Do you feel you have good information? Where did you learn what you know? It's okay if you don't know much, that's important to write, too. Global Warming Part 2: Climate Change Lessons from the Past As a detective investigating global warming, the first thing you'll set out to do is learn what it is you're really dealing with. What is global climate change, exactly? Without understanding how climate has changed on Earth over millennia, it's impossible to have any basis for comparison when trying to understand current climate patterns. To truly understand climate change, you'll do what many scientists have already done and continue to do — find out all you can about the history of earth's climate. Does earth have natural fluctuations in its climate? If so, over what time span do these fluctuations occur? Without understanding how climate has changed on earth over millennia, it's impossible to have any basis for comparison when trying to understand current climate patterns. Follow the link to “NOAA's Paleoclimatic Data Before 1000 Years Ago.” to find out about the earth's climate and climate change prior to 1000 years ago. Be sure to read the linked summaries to “commonly cited periods of warmth.” Next find out about climate over the last 1000 years by following the link to “NOAA's Paleoclimatic Data of the Last 1000 Years.” Pay particular attention to the paragraphs and graphs below the “Summary of Studies” heading. You'll use the information you've just read to answer the questions NOAA's Paleoclimatic Data Before 1000 Years Ago NOAA's Paleoclimatic Data of the Last 1000 Years 1. How do you go about estimating ancient temperatures? Is there more than one way? 2. How would you determine whether climate was changing (consider that the earth has different seasons, so how would you know whether climate was changing?)? 3. When estimating ancient temperatures, do different estimates tend to agree with each other, or disagree? In other words, for a given period in earth's history, do different researchers and different climate measures give similar results?do they agree with one another? 4. Is there evidence that the earth has warmed or cooled in the past 1000 years? 5. Is there evidence that it has warmed or cooled before 1000 years ago? 6. What are some explanations for why the earth's climate changed in the ancient past? 7. When the earth's climate shifted in the ancient past, do we know how long it took? 8. Why do scientists look at climate both prior to 1000 years ago, and over the last 1000 years? Does this level of scrutiny provide us a better grasp of how global climate works? Comparing Current to Ancient Climate Now that you've learned about earth's ancient climate patterns, you'll want to do some further sleuthing to understand more about current global climate patterns. How would decide whether climate has changed over the last 100 years. Also, how would you know whether recent climate change is fundamentally different than it was prior to the industrial revolution? In other words, what evidence would you need to show that humans might be having an impact on current climate patterns (HINT: would comparing the rate of climate change in the ancient past to present day help answer the question?)? Find out more about relatively recent climate change (over about the last 140 years) by following the link to “NOAA's Instrumental Record of Past Global Temperatures”. You'll use the information presented there and the information from what you've already read at “NOAA's Paleoclimatic Data of the Last 100 Years” to answer the questions. NOAA's Instrumental Record of Past Global Temperatures NOAA's Paleoclimatic Data of the Last 1000 Years 1. Do scientists use different methods to estimate climate over the last 100 years, than they do for measuring ancient climate patterns? If so, would this affect the reliability of the data in either scenario? 2. Do measurements using human-made instruments (like satellites and thermometers) suggest that global climate has been warming over the last century? 3. Is there anything different about warming over the last 100 years compared to ancient global climate change? 4. Does the rate of warming differ over the last 100 years compared to the rates of warming further in the past? 5. Even if warming has been dramatically different over the last 100 years, does that provide definitive evidence that human-related activities are the cause? (We'll discuss this question at more length in subsequent sessions. What other things would you need to know — besides temperature change — to be able to say whether humans are partly responsible for current warming trends?) Global Warming Part 3: Nuts and Bolts How the Science Gets Done The next part of your detective work is to gain a working knowledge of how the science of studying climate change gets done. If you see exactly how and why scientists say what they do about climate, and if you understand the nuts and bolts behind how the science gets done, then you'll be a better equipped detective — you'll be far more confident about judging the validity of information you find regarding climate change. Recall that some of the tools scientists use to examine past climate patterns include ice cores, tree rings, satellites, and thermometers. There are actually two main approaches to measuring climate. One way is through direct measurements. The other is by using indirect, or “proxy” measurements. Proxy measurements are critical to scientists interested in the earth's past climate record. Without proxies, we'd have no idea of what earth's climate was like in the past. Some tools are like time machines — they provide scientists surprisingly detailed views of what the earth's climate and atmospheric composition were like in the past. Can you think of some ways you could measure climate directly versus indirectly? Weather Stations Various instruments come under the umbrella heading of “weather station.” In fact, any weather station may or may not contain all of these instruments. If you have an outdoor thermometer that tracks temperature change, you have a sort of weather station. But for climate researchers, tracking these measurements must be a long-term project. Climate researchers keep records of temperature, humidity, barometric pressure, wind speed and velocity, cloud cover and rainfall from all over the world — from both land and sea. In addition, many sites have climate data that are archived for many years — so researchers can compare measurements from decades ago to current weather patterns. These measurements are mainly recent, however. The ability to measure weather patterns this way has only been around for the last couple of centuries. Satellites Satellites can measure the temperature of the earth's lower atmosphere (troposphere). These measurements have been recorded for only about the last twenty years. But the measurements of temperature in the troposphere tend to agree with the surface temperature recordings, though by a slightly lesser degree. Greenhouse Gases Special equipment can precisely measure the amount of different greenhouse gases currently in the atmosphere. The records for these kinds of measurements are, by necessity, recent — they only go back as far as when the technology became available to measure them. But scientists can see short-term changes in atmospheric gases like carbon dioxide, nitrates, methane, and others. And they can compare ice core measurements (see below) of some of these gases from the more distant past. For more information on measuring greenhouse gases follow the link to “EPA's Climate Change and Greenhouse Gases”. http://web.archive.org/web/20130510201015/http://www.epa.gov/outreach/scientific.html The Climate Change Toolbox Proxy Measurements Tree Rings Chances are good you've had the chance to count tree rings — you look at a crosswise slab of wood and pick out the lines spanning from the center to the bark's edge. You can read much more than the age of a tree with these lines, however. Scientists who specialize in reading tree rings are called “dendrochronologists.” And they can look at changes to each ring and make accurate predictions about what the climate was like when they tree laid down a particular ring. That's because each ring corresponds to a year of growth, and good years with favorable temperature and precipitation correspond to relatively large rings. When the climate was less favorable for a particular tree's growth the rings are smaller — showing that the tree didn't grow as well in a given year. To use tree ring data, scientists have to have trees. They can look at tree rings from trees recently cut down, or they can use a bore to study rings from live trees without cutting them down. They can also use long dead trees from ancient structures or shipwrecks. Wood that has been well preserved over the centuries works particularly well. Pollen “Paleobotanists” are scientists who specialize in understanding ancient plant life and pollen. Pollen can provide very good evidence of what regional climate was like for a given area. To find pollen that corresponds with ancient times, scientists take cores from lakes and sediments. Then they analyze the pollen grains at different levels in the core that correspond to different time periods — the oldest pollen can be found at the bottom of the core, while the most recent is found near the top. For every species of pollen, there is a suite of habitat conditions that would have been necessary for that species to survive and thrive. So if certain pollen grains turn up in a sample, scientists can make accurate predictions about what regional climate conditions were probably like at the time. Historical and Biological Records Like pollen, other species of organism can yield clues to scientists about ancient climate patterns. For instance, entomologists (scientists who study insects) can determine what the regional climate was based on which insects show up in different areas of a sediment core. The same is true for marine animals. Tiny bivalves and crustaceans from sea sediment cores can yield clues about what the marine environment was like at a particular time in history. Ice Cores Ice cores are like a window to the past. When you drill a core of ice from a place it has lain untouched for thousands of years, you get not only frozen water, but also a frozen record of past atmospheric data. Ice cores contain dust, different concentrations of gases, different forms of oxygen, and other pieces of data — all of which help scientists to draw a very detailed picture of what climate was like for a give region in ancient history. Here you'll take a few minutes to do a little more in-depth exploration of how ice forms, how cores are collected, why they are important to climate research. Though we don't have time to review all of the climate change tools in this depth (but see the list of references if you want to learn more about the other tools), it is helpful to you as a detective to learn more about at least one of these tools. And ice cores are particularly valuable to climate researchers. Let's find out why... Take a few minutes to visit the link found at the bottom of this page, “Secrets of the Ice,” a Web site developed by the Museum of Science in Boston. http://web.archive.org/web/20120621213010/http://www.mos.org/soti/ Ice Core Review Questions Ice Formation and Flow 1. What is “firn?” 2. How is “pure ice” formed? 3. How long may it take for pure ice to form? 4. What happens to air trapped in the snow as it is transformed into pure ice? 5. The oldest ice is at the ____________ of the ice core. 6. What are some factors that scientists consider when deciding from what location they should try to remove an ice core? 7. About how long does it take to drill and remove about 200 feet of ice? 8. When the cores are brought to the surface, scientists try to place them into a general time frame. They look at the light and dark banding of the cores to estimate time — much like scientists use tree rings to count backwards in time. The light areas represent what? And the dark areas represent what? 9. What is insolation? 10. Milankovitch cycles can account for some changes in the earth's climate in the past. Why? 11. How does dust in the earth's atmosphere affect climate? Why do scientists who study ice cores look at calcium dust, in particular? 12. How do atmospheric gases get trapped in ice? Can scientists see what greenhouse gases were present in ancient times by examining ice cores? Ice Cores: Interpreting the Data Now that you've learned about ice cores, imagine that you're a scientist who's going to interpret some data from a recently removed hunk of ice. Follow the link at the bottom of the page to “Interpreting Ice Core Data” and complete the “Secrets of the Ice” activity. 1. Does there seem to be a correlation between each of the variables and temperature? Are they proportional or inversely proportional? 2. Is the timing between a change in any variable and a corresponding change in temperature immediate or is there a delay? Why do you think a delay might exist? 3. Describe how any part of the graph, for any of the variables, could be used to determine past or future climatic conditions. 4. If you overlay two or more graphs would your answers be the same? Predicting the Future Climate Models and Predictions Most climate scientists agree that the earth's climate is warming. It has, in fact, warmed by about 0.6 - 1.2° F since the late 19th century. But will it continue to warm into the future? Climate models are what researchers use to try to answer that question. Researchers design mathematical models that take into account a wide range of climate variables recorded from the direct and indirect measurements we discussed above — including cloud cover, presence of greenhouse gases, temperature, precipitation, and many others. Then they allow large and sophisticated super-computers running sophisticated climate models to come up with predictions. These mathematical models are the best attempt scientists can make at predicting the future of climate. But that doesn't mean that they will come true. By making many predictions, and taking into account many variables from all over the country and the world, scientists hope that these models provide people with the most likely kinds of climate scenarios that they can expect. Global Warming Part 4: The Science Behind the Climate Change Story Now that you know how scientists use direct and indirect measurements to study climate change, the next step in your detective's journey is to find out what the results of these studies are. Exactly what have the tools in the climate change toolbox told us? To find out, you'll read about three major areas of research on climate change: the weather biological and ecological systems the climate itself What Is the Science Telling Us? Bird Migration Biology Biologists and ecologists are discovering significant changes in bird and other animals' habits and patterns. This kind of evidence does not directly show shifts in climate like the research highlighted later in the section on Climate. But it does provide compelling indirect evidence that the climate may be changing — and it provides information on how climate change can and will affect populations of organisms. If biologists have studied particular organisms and their habits for a number of years, and those habits begin to change in what seems to be a response to shifts in temperature, or other climate-related factors — then a possible explanation for those changes in habits would be based on shifts in climate. Let's take a closer look at a couple of these kinds of studies. Climate Shifts: Bird and Mammal Habits Climate change affects lower altitude environments differently than higher altitude ones. And that can confuse animals that use those environments. A recently published study by Dr. David Inouye, a professor at the University of Maryland, and his colleagues, documents changes in bird and mammal behavior at the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, in Gothic, Colorado. The Lab, nestled at about 9,500 feet above sea level, is still covered with snow in the spring even though temperatures are a little warmer. At the same time, over the last 25 years, spring has arrived earlier and earlier in areas of lower altitude. As a result, American Robins that migrate from low altitude wintering grounds to high-altitude summer breeding grounds in the Rockies, are arriving earlier in the spring (14 days earlier over the past 19 years), and must wait longer for snow to melt before they can feed and nest. This puts them at risk of starvation since not much food is available when snow still coats the ground. Hibernation Patterns What's more, yellow-bellied marmots (close relatives of woodchucks) usually hibernate for eight months during the long mountain winters. But now they are emerging earlier — 38 days earlier over the past 23 years — from their winter's dens in anticipation of early springs. Inouye thinks that the marmots emerge because of the warmer spring temperatures, and that they anticipate an early snowmelt. When in fact, the snow doesn't melt earlier — if anything, it's been melting later than normal. So the marmots, too, risk starvation as they wait longer for snow to melt before they can feed. Researchers have documented these shifts by paying close attention to when robins arrive at the Lab, and when marmots emerge from their dens. Says Inouye, “ A relatively simple observation, such as the first sighting of a robin each spring, can be made almost by anyone, and if continued for a long enough time, can provide important insights into global change.” He's concerned that other high-altitude animals may be at risk. “There is growing evidence to support that climate change is resulting in earlier and longer growing seasons at low altitudes, earlier migrations by some bird species, and earlier reproduction in both plants and animals,” says Inouye. Climate Changes Species Behavior, Inouye article Article by Dr. David Inouye, Climate change is affecting altitudinal migrants and hibernating species. Climate Change has affected the breeding date of Tree Swallows Article by Dunn P.O. and D. W. Winkler, Climate change has affected the breeding date of tree swallows throughout North America. Climate Changes Butterfly Behavior USA Today article, Scientists see signs of European butterflies reacting to global warming. Animal Biology: Correlation vs. Causation All of these studies are quite interesting because they document significant changes in animal biology — those changes may be in seasonal timing, in how far birds migrate north, or even in the extinction of certain species. And each of these studies correlates the animals' behavior changes to significant shifts in climate — warmer weather earlier, for instance, or warmer temperatures further north than they once were. But does a correlation absolutely prove a relationship between these animals' behavior changes and shifts in the climate? Correlations are just that — they show that two or more factors are related to each other. And just because they are related doesn't necessarily mean that climate is affecting animal biology. But researchers can also examine many other factors and show that those factors are much less likely to be causing behavior changes, than climate. Thus, many of these kinds of studies show very strong correlations of climate change with organisms' biology — so you can grow more confident that climate is in some way responsible. Questions to Consider: 1. Does the research on tree swallows, robins, yellow-bellied marmots, and butterflies (in the Biology section above) prove beyond a doubt that the animals' are changing their seasonal habits, migration patterns, and nesting behaviors because of warmer spring temperatures? Are there alternative explanations? If so, how likely are they? 2. Based on your reading, do you personally think that a changing climate may be responsible for the changes in animals' habits that you read about? What if there were ten more studies like this, or a hundred? How would that affect your answer? Weather Events and Patterns Some climate scientists are concerned that global climate change could bring about more extreme weather events. Weather and climate are tricky things to predict. And to attribute specific weather events to global warming is even trickier. That's because it's impossible to link particular weather events with global warming without very long-term data. First you must have well-kept records of temperature, rainfall, storm intensity, drought intensity, and other weather phenomena, over large scales. To that you need to add weather models that predict what would happen in the face of global warming. Only after many, many years of comparison can you say for sure (with a statistically significant relationship) that global warming is, in fact, causing severe or unusual climate or weather events. But there are some hints that suggest recent weather events and patterns are related to global warming. A group of researchers at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies use global climate models to try to answer these sorts of questions. Dr. James Hansen says that global warming could lead to greater climate extremes. He even testified to Congress in 1988 and 1989 that global warming would lead to greater climate extremes. He says, “On the one hand you might see more intense droughts, heat waves and fires, but, on the other hand, you'd also heavier rainfall, greater floods and stronger storms. This makes sense — increased heating of the surface increases the temperature and intensifies drought at times and places with dry conditions. But over the ocean and places that are wet, the increased heating of the surface increases evaporation, intensifies storms driven by latent heat, and causes greater flooding.” Natural Variability? Are these extreme weather effects large enough to be noticeable — and if so, can we positively attribute them to global warming? So far, says Dr. James Hansen, of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, it's hard to say that an extreme weather event isn't just a part of natural weather variability. For instance, he says that we've seen global warming of about one degree Fahrenheit, and that, “is not large enough to cause (extreme weather) effects as large as natural variability. So probably most 'strange weather' is just that &151; strange workings of nature.“ However, adds Hansen, “when a really extreme event occurs, like the Chicago heat wave of a few years ago, I have to ask myself the question 'would that extreme event have occurred in the absence of all the human-made greenhouse gases in the atmosphere?' The answer that I come up with frequently, including the Chicago case, is: 'probably not.'” Extreme Events and Climate — The Link Explored Climate scientists from NOAA, the National Center for Atmosphere Research, and other institutions, recently published a review of the scientific literature available on climate and extreme weather events. The paper, published in the September 22, 2000 issue of the journal Science, discussed whether a potential change in climate (e.g. global warming) could explain increases in extreme weather events. The authors reviewed dozens of scientific studies, and found that in many of the areas studied, “changes in total precipitation are amplified at the tails (meaning that where rainfall is heavy it has gotten heavier, and where it is lightest, it has gotten even drier), and changes in some temperature extremes have been observed.” They also reviewed various climate models for the future and saw that the models predict changes in extreme events including increases in extreme high and low temperatures, and increases in intense rainfall and precipitation events. In addition, they documented changes in biological systems that are occurring more frequently — presumably as a result of changes in climate, and perhaps by changes in extreme events. “Climate induced extinctions, distributional (and breeding/seasonal) changes, and species' range shifts are being documented at an increasing rate,” wrote the authors. They concluded with, “Although the direct link between societal and biological impacts and climate change is often difficult to make, a growing body of evidence linking climatic and biological changes suggests systematic global increases in both the frequency and impact of extreme weather and climate events.” Questions to Consider: 1. Is there evidence that global warming is affecting extreme weather events? 2. Why is it difficult to be able to say so conclusively? 3. Does the review paper published in Science strengthen or weaken your detective's judgment on whether global warming is affecting extreme weather events? Why? Climate Current Trends? From your research on the history of earth's climate in Global Warming Parts 2 and 3 you know that proxy measurements from ice cores, tree rings, pollen, and others, have shown that the earth's climate is dynamic. It has varied from warmer to cooler and back again throughout the distant past. You also know that recent measurements taken over the last 150 years have shown a dramatic warming trend. The rate of this warming is highly unusual when compared to climate over the last few thousand years. Now let's look more closely at a few recent studies on climate... Rivers and Lakes Freeze Later and Thaw Earlier Read the story titled “Icy Records Show Warming Trend” research on freeze and thaw records all over the northern hemisphere from the last 150 years Ocean Traps Heat Check out a story showing results of another kind of record — records of the oceans' temperatures over the last 70 years or so by following the link to “Missing Heat” below. Glacier Gives Clues to Climatic Past Also, read a USA Today article highlighting recent research published in the journal Science: “Tibetan glacier yields evidence of warming” Icy Records Show Warming Trend: November, 2000 Missing Heat Found in World Oceans: August, 2000 Tibetan Glacier Yields Evidence of Warming Climate Questions to Consider 1. Name two proxy tools used to collect data on past climate in the above three studies. 2. Do these studies yield direct or indirect evidence that the climate is warming (for example, compared to the studies highlighted in the Biology section above)? NOTE: It's helpful to recognize that researchers who examine how animal biology is affected by climate change often use studies like the ones above to document shifts in climate, and to correlate those shifts with the biological system they are studying. 3. So, do you think that the earth's climate has warmed over the last 150 years? 4. How do the data from the oceans' temperatures support the climate models for predicted climate change? Global Warming Part 5: Current Climate Change — Are Humans Involved? Based on your detective work so far, you've uncovered data that clearly document a planetary warming trend. The question now is, what's causing the current shift in climate? You've seen that the earth has undergone many changes in climate in the past, well before humans could potentially affect global climate. So clearly there are a variety of natural explanations for global climate change. But are they sufficient to explain the earth's current warming? If not, does the impact of certain human activities help explain global warming? But How Do You Study That? Imagine doing an experiment. You're testing the effects of fertilizer on plant growth. So, you've got two plants in two separate pots. To one pot, you add water enriched with a measured amount of fertilizer. To the second pot, you add the same amount of water without fertilizer. The pot with water only is your control. Controls are critical to any science experiment because without them you cannot say for sure whether the experimental variable was what caused your observed results (in this case the fertilizer causes your experimental plant to grow more quickly). Ideally, in science experiments there is a control. Often scientists make observations without the benefit of a control (for example, recording the timing of robins' arrival each spring), but these are not actual experiments — they are called observational studies. Observational Studies So how does this relate to studying whether humans are partly responsible for climate change? Well, consider our earth. There is just one earth. And there is now human activity occurring on it that might be partly responsible for climate change. But there's no control to this experiment. There's no second earth. Hypothetically speaking, it would be ideal to have two identical earths, each occupying the same general spot in orbit, the same distance from the sun, and each with the exact same climatic conditions. Then, to one, we could add a hefty population of humans that cuts and burns forests, burns fossil fuels, and releases greenhouse gases from a variety of sources. To the other earth, we would add no humans. Then we could measure all the important climatic variables we've learned about and see whether the experimental earth's climate (humans added) warmed up significantly more than the control earth's climate (no humans). But we clearly can do no such thing. There is no non-human earth to compare our climate to, yet we are equipped to change the chemical make-up of our atmosphere profoundly enough that climate could shift. In effect, then, we are running an uncontrolled experiment on earth and we don't know the outcome. But scientists have figured out some elegant ways to make good guesses about whether human activity is involved. The most important first step is to understand how natural phenomena can affect climate. The question is this, can natural phenomena completely explain current climate shifts, or are those explanations inadequate to clarify climate change? If so, does the effect of human activity help explain current climate patterns? Natural Explanations First, find out more about natural processes that affect global climate. Visit the Geography course module created by Dr. Michael J. Pidwirny, of the Department of Geography at Okanagan University College in British Columbia. The module is an Introduction to Natural Causes of Climate Change, and you can find it at by following the link at the bottom of the paragraph to the “Fundamentals of Physical Geography”. Some of the reading may be a bit advanced but if you use these questions as a guide, you can just look for the information you need, and skim the technical details (unless you are interested of course!). http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/7y.html Answer the following questions, as you read through this lesson: 1. List the extraterrestrial factors that affect global climate. 2. Now list the ocean, atmosphere, and land factors that affect global climate. 3. What are the four main factors that are primarily responsible for past episodes of climate change? 4. Pick one of these four factors, and in one paragraph, explain how it could affect global climate. 5. What two things are thrown into the atmosphere when a volcano erupts? Which one of these may affect global climate? How? 6. Have any climate modifying volcanic eruptions occurred during the last century? What were they, and how did they affect global climate? Now follow the link to “EPA's Global Warming Climate Page” and read their description of the Greenhouse Effect. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/index.html#ggo Now answer these questions: 1. Why is the greenhouse effect important? 2. Is the greenhouse effect a natural phenomenon? 3. How does the greenhouse effect work? Human-Related Explanations Clearly natural processes can impact global climate. But are people now also contributing to global affects on climate? To wrap up what you've discovered about ancient climate and natural causes of climate variation, and to consider some questions about whether humans are involved in current warming trends, read “NOAA's Paleoclimatology Global Warming — The Final Word”. Then read the “New York Times — Global Warming” article by Andrew C. Revkin. The story not only highlights a recent study that indicates humans are partly responsible for current climate warming, it also briefly outlines the bigger issue of trying to resolve the different effects of natural versus human processes on climate. (You may need to register to read the article, but there is no charge for doing so.) NOAA's Paleoclimatology Global Warming — The Final Word New York Times — Global Warming Some Questions Answer the following questions based on the article you've just read on the preceeding page: 1. What were the two main “natural processes” that Dr. Crowley examined? 2. Dr. Crowley used a climate model to see how these two natural processes predicted climate over the last 1000 years. His results showed that the natural processes appeared to explain climate for the last 1000 years, up until when? 3. After the mid 1800s, the relationship between natural processes and climate broke down. What did Dr. Crowley find to be the most likely explanation for temperature increases over the last 150 years? 4. Did other scientists agree or disagree with Crowley's findings? Why or why not? 5. Why does this study provide a good starting point for examining the issues surrounding “natural” versus “human-caused” global climate change? 6. Does this study prove that current climate warming is due to human activity? “Global Waffling?” Let's start off by reading the September 10, 2000 article written by Andrew C. Revkin of the New York Times titled “Global Waffling: When Will We Be Sure?” (You'll have to register first if you haven't already, but it's totally free). New York Times — Global Waffling Now answer these questions: 1. When Revkin writes, “The bigger the idea, the harder it often is to verify with precision,” what does he mean? Is global warming a big idea? 2. How do so-called global warming “skeptics” use scientific subtleties when debating the idea of global warming? 3. Scientific skepticism can be and is very important to advancing our understanding of the natural world. Do you think all skepticism is healthy? Why or why not? 4. Writes Revkin, “Somehow, many experts say, if the (global warming) threat is to be countered, societies will have to figure out a way to act in the face of gray uncertainty, to deal aggressively with a problem that lacks the attributes of a crisis.” What does he mean by “gray uncertainty?” 5. Do you think people should attempt to curb greenhouse gas emissions and pollution in an attempt to slow global warming — even if the science shows areas of gray uncertainty? “The Contrarian View” Now read The New York Times February 29, 2000 article titled, “Global Warming: The Contrarian View,” which gives a more detailed synopsis of why the skeptics are skeptical. And answer these questions: New York Times — Global Warming: The Contrarian View 1. Explain the difference in temperature readings between ground measurements and satellite measurements. 2. Why do some people think this discrepancy weakens the argument for global warming? 3. According to the article, is there debate among scientists (proponents and skeptics) as to whether the climate is warming? Do proponents and skeptics agree on the amount of current and future warming? 4a. Do the skeptics believe humans are responsible for current warming trends, or do they say observed warming can be attributed to natural causes? b. Does this agree with the research you've examined, or with the conclusions drawn by the IPCC? Who should you believe? Why? Now read this: http://www.nwf.org/~/media/PDFs/GlobalWarming/Global%20Warming%20State%20Fact%20Sheets/Virginia.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20130221T1 113481718 Write an essay explaining what you have learned and how it relates to your local community.