* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Linkage, Crossing Over, and Chromosome Mapping
Molecular Inversion Probe wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Genomic library wikipedia , lookup
Saethre–Chotzen syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Copy-number variation wikipedia , lookup
Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup
Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Gene desert wikipedia , lookup
Skewed X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Y chromosome wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Neocentromere wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Linkage, Crossing Over, and Chromosome Mapping Chapters 5 and 6; 13&14 I. Linkage • • • Linkage = genes on same chromosome Linked genes violate Independent Assortment – Dihybrid should produce 4 gametic types Linked genes tend to follow Segregation – Hybrid should produce 2 gametic types I. Linkage • • Discovered by William Bateson and R.C. Punnett in early 1900’s Bateson coined term “genetics” I. Linkage • • • • Bateson and Punnett studied sweet pea Flower color gene (P = purple, p = red) Pollen grain shape (L = long, l = round) Created dihybrid and made dihybrid cross I. Sweet Pea • • • Parentals in excess Recombinants rare Proposed physical coupling and repulsion of alleles I. Linkage in Drosophila • T.H. Morgan used test cross and demonstrated “coupling” and “repulsion” 1 • • • Suggested coupling and repulsion due to linkage on homologous chromosomes Coupled arrangements due to linkage Repulsion due to crossing over Coupled (or cis) arrangement II. Crossing Over II A. Phenomenon • • • • • Pachynema of Prophase I Homologues paired via synaptonemal complex As chromosomes shorten in diplonema, chiasmata become visible Male Drosophila lack crossing over entirely In humans, crossover rates are 75-100% higher in females than in males! II B. Effect of Crossing Over • If parentals cis (coupling), then crossovers show repulsion (or trans) arrangment • Result of crossover is to generate non-parental or recombinant arrangements of alleles II C. Testing for Linkage • • • Compare rates of gametic types to those predicted by independent assortment If rates deviate, then linkage supported If rates do not deviate, then linkage not supported • • • • Use test crosses, as independent assortment predicts equal frequencies of alternatives Monohybrid test cross 1:1 Dihybrid test cross 1:1:1:1 Trihybrid test cross 1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1 • Number of alternatives 2n (why?) • Dihybrid creates 4 gametic types 2 • • • 2 parental 2 recombinants If independent, in 1:1:1:1 ratio Testcross of Dihybrid Testcross of Dihybrid • • Recombinants are 50% of progeny Recombination frequency of 50% II C. Testing for Linkage • • If genes are linked, and no crossing over occurs, then only get parentals If genes are linked, and get a single crossover, get two parentals and two recombinants • • • If linked, recombinants should be rare and only produced by crossovers Each parental type more than ¼ of progeny Each recombinant less than ¼ of progeny • • • • Cis/trans and coupling/repulsion pr vg pr+ vg+ Cis arrangements: both alleles have either wild type or mutant or dominant or recessive Also called coupling Cis/trans and coupling/repulsion pr vg+ • pr+ vg trans arrangements: each chromosome has one wild type and one mutant (or one dominant and one recessive) Also called repulsion • • • • pr • vg (red eye, normal wing) = 157 recombinant (cis, coupled) pr • vg (purple eye, vestigial) = 146 recombinant (cis, coupled) pr+ • vg (red eye, vestigial) = 965 parental (trans, repulsion) + pr • vg (purple eye, normal wing) =1067 parental (trans, repulsion) • II C. Testcross progeny: + + 3 • • If independent, expect 1:1:1:1 ratio χ2 test for linkage: – – • • Null hypothesis is results are not different from (are consistent with) predictions from Independent Assortment model. Thus, if we REJECT model of Independent Assortment, we conclude Linkage. χ2 = 806.15, 3df, P < 0.01 Reject null hypothesis, reject model of Independent Assortment, conclude Linkage II D. Map Units • • 1 map unit = 1% recombination Map Distance = % recombination = (157 + 146)/2335 • 100 = 13.0 mu = 13.0 cM 13.0 Map: pr vg II E. Cytological Proof of Crossing Over • • Curt Stern (Drosophila) Harriet Creighton and Barbara McClintock (Corn, 1931) II E. Cytological Proof of Crossing Over • • • • • • • Two loci Seed color C = colored; c = colorless Endosperm Wx = waxy, wx = starchy Chromosome with C and wx with knob at “C” end and longer piece at “wx” end A trans arrangement (note: text says C and Wx, but original 1931 paper says C and wx, as shown below from original paper) Recombinant genotypes (cis) were associated with recombinant chromosomes II F. Multiple Crossovers & Maximum Recombination Rate • • Maximum detectable recombination rate due to crossovers is 50% In dihybrid, # parentals = # recombinants 4 • • That is, linked genes may act independent But why is maximum detectable crossover rate 50%? II F 1. Single Crossovers • • If every cell undergoing meiosis had SCO, half of chromatids recombinant, half parentals Thus, 2 of 4 chromatids recombinant, = 50% recombination = 50 mu = 50 cM II F 2. Double Crossovers • • • 2-strand DCO yields 0 recombinants 3-strand DCO yields 2 recombinants 4-strand DCO yields 4 recombinants • • Average of the three alternatives (0/4; 2/4; 4/4) yields 2/4 recombinant strands 2/4 = 50% recombination II F Multiple Crossovers & Maximum Recombination Rate • Thus, genes linked but far apart on a chromosome may act independent (50% recombination) II G. Additive Map Units and Linkage Maps • • • • • • • By using multiple loci, can build linkage maps with additive map distances Additive distances can be greater than 50 mu Human Chromosome #1 Additive distance of 356 cM Additive distances (cM) and cytological distances may differ in distances Same in linear order What accounts for the differences in distances? III. Three-point Cross • • • • 2-strand DCO masks crossover by generating parental arrangment Note arrangement of outer loci (v and cv) Parentals in trans arrangement Create 2-stand DCO • Note that outer loci are still trans (parentals) 5 • If add a third locus, then 2-strand DCO distinguishable III. Method of Analysis • • • For trihybrid, 23 = 8 different gametic types If independent, the 8 classes occur in a 1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio in the gametes and in the progeny of a testcross If linked, the ratio will be violated III A. Method 1 • • • • • • Arrange 8 classes as reciprocal classes Identify parental classes by finding the most common reciprocal class Identify DCO by finding the least common reciprocal class Identify linear order of the three loci by comparing the allelic arrangements to the DCO Calculate the map distances Calculate Interference Linear order of loci • What change to parentals will result in DCO? • Switch each locus and see which matches DCO • That switch represents the middle locus 6 • Which choice matches actual DCO? • Actual DCO is • • Actual DCO is A b C and a B c Flipping “B” gives DCO arrangement • • • Actual DCO is A b C and a B c Flipping “B” gives DCO arrangement Therefore, “B” is in middle • • • Calculate A-B distance A-B = (SCO for A-B + DCO) / Total (130 + 150 + 6 + 4) / 2000 * 100 = 14.5 mu • • • Calculate B-C distance B-C = (SCO for B-C + DCO) / Total (65 + 65 + 6 + 4) / 2000 * 100 = 7.0 mu • • • • • • • A b C and a B c Additive distance A-C = (A-B) + (B-C) =14.5 + 7.0 = 21.5 cM What is the A-C map distance if the DCO are “ignored”? That is, treat A-C as a two-point cross MD = (SCO A-B + SCO B-C)/2000 * 100 MD = (130 + 150 + 65 + 65)/2000 * 100 MD = 20.5 cM Why is 20.5 less than the additive 21.5? Interference • If DCO are random (independent), then actual occurrence of DCO should be equal to 7 • joint probability of individual SCO frequencies That is, multiply probability of SCO between middle and outer locus with probability of SCO between middle and other outer locus Using previous example of A-B = 14.5 cM B-C = 7.0 cM • Joint Probability of simultaneous SCO between A-B and SCO between B-C = 0.145 * 0.070 = 0.01015 • • About 1% chance (1.015%) of DCO if random • However, if NOT independent, then presence of one SCO interferes/alters chance of second SCO Interference = • I = 1 – ((10/2000) / 0.01015) • • • • • I = 0.507 means obtained about half of expected values I values typically range from 0 to 1 0 = NO interference (observed = expected) 1 = COMPLETE interference (no observed DCO) Coefficient of coincidence is the observed/expected value • • • Interference values tend to increase as distance between loci decreases At about 10 cM between outside loci, DCO disappear (I = 1) At about 45 cM, interference disappears (I = 0) 1 – (observed DCO/expected DCO) = 1 – (0.005/0.01015) = 1 – 0.493 = 0.507 III B. Method 2 • • • • • • • • As in other method, pair up reciprocal arrangements Identify parentals as most common class Identify type of crossover for each remaining reciprocal class Calculate map distances for the 3 “pairs” of loci Outer loci will have greatest distance Draw linkage map Identify DCO Calculate Interference 8 • v-cv = (45 + 40 + 89 + 94) / 1448 = 268/1448 = 18.5% • • • • cv-ct = (45 + 40 + 3 + 5) / 1448 = 93/1448 = 6.4% ct-v = (89 + 94 + 3 + 5) / 1448 = 191/1448 = 13.2% As v-cv (18.5%) is largest value, then v-cv are the two outside loci, with ct middle locus Interference value = 1 – ((8/1448)/(0.132 * 0.064)) = 1 – (0.00552/0.0084) = 1 – 0.663 = 0.337 IV. Mapping by Tetrad Analysis • • • • • Ascomycete fungi contains meiotic products within ascus Typically post-meiotic doubling (8 spores) In some species, meiotic products not ordered within ascus In some species (Neurospora, Sordaria), meiotic products are ordered within the ascus Score individual asci, use counts to map genes • • • • With two loci, get three asci types PD (parental ditypes): two spore phenotypes of parental type (4:4 within ascus) NPD (nonparental ditype): two spore phenotypes of parental type (4:4 within ascus) TT (tetratype): 4 spore phenotypes, 2 parental and 2 nonparental (2:2:2:2 within ascus) 9 • • • • • What causes these three asci types? If both loci on different chromosomes PD and NPD result from different segregation patterns at Meiosis I (Independent Assortment) PD should be equal to NPD TT results from SCO between gene and centromere • • If both loci on same chromosome PD simple segregation and 2-strand DCO • • • If both loci on same chromosome NPD from 4-strand DCO PD should be much more common than NPD • • If both loci on same chromosome TT results from SCO and 3-strand DCO • Map Distance = (½ TT + 3NPD)/Total Asci x 100 V. Recombination Within Gene • • • • • • • • Up until 1950’s genes thought to be “beads” along a chromosome “Beads” were indivisible and crossing over only occurred between beads (genes) Seymour Benzer, using rII locus of phage T4, showed recombination occurred within gene We will examine evidence from the X-linked lozenge locus of Drosophila lz locus affects eye shape and reduces eye pigments lz mutants are recessive and many are known Two lz mutants (lzBS and lzg) Use flanking linked loci to identify crossover – – ct : cut wing, 7.7 cM to left of lozenge v: vermillion eye color, 5.3 cM to right of lozenge 10 • • • • • • Flanking loci cis in females Production of wild-type progeny could be caused by either mutation or crossover between the lzBS and lzg loci If due to mutation, wild-type should have cis (parental) arrangment of ct and v If due to crossover between the lzBS and lzg loci should have trans (recombinant) arrangement of ct and v From 16,000 progeny, 134 males and females with wild-eyes were found Male wild-type progeny (w/maternal X), had cut wings and normal eye color VI. Complementation • • • Earlier we examined a technique to determine if mutants affecting the same trait were allelic or different loci It turns out for a particular trait there may be many mutants that alter the same phenotypic trait The complementation test can determine alleleism or different locus origin of recessive mutants • P • F1 • F2 • • Not the ratio expected for monohybrid Are these two white flower strains allelic or different loci? • P • F1 • F2 • What does the phenotype of the F1 suggest, allelic or different loci? White flower pea x White flower pea Purple Flower Pea Purple:White 9:7 White flower pea x White flower pea Purple Flower Pea Purple:White 9:7 VII. Mapping Human Genes 11 VII A. Somatic Cell Hybrids • • • Fuse human cells with rodent cells Hybrids selectively lose human chromosomes Form stable cell lines with different human chromosome compositions Grow in media that requires • TK gene product from human cells • HGPRT from rodent cell • Only hybrids can grow • Correlate presence/absence of gene or gene product with presence/absence of human chromosomes • Test multiple cell lines • • • • + means present, - means absent Gene 1 is on which chromosome? Gene 2 is on which chromosome? Gene 3 is on which chromosome? Human beta-galactosidase gene Human Alzheimer gene – discordance data (gene and chromosome) VII B. Molecular Mapping • • • Known Gene Product Unknown Gene Product LOD scores VII B 1. Known Gene Product • RNA or protein product known 12 • Use probe complementary to gene, bind probe to DNA/chromosomes FISH (Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization) • • Reverse transcribe mRNA to make cDNA probe labeled with fluorescent dye If have protein, make cDNA probe that codes for protein primary structure FISH (Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization) • Denature chromosomes on a slide • Bind probe to chromosome prep • Look for hybridization FISH for Telomeres FISH for Muscle Protein (Chromosome #11) FISH of Chromosome #1 FISH Chromosome Painting Using Probes With Cloned Libraries • • • • • Genetic Library – – Collection of clones Contains genetic information of an individual Types: – – Genomic library: all genes of an individual Chromosomal library: all genes of one chromosome Human libraries often kept in yeast using YAC (Yeast Artificial Chromosome) Human genomic library contained within 1,800 YAC clones Genes found in clones by hybridization of probe to gene – – Uses complementary base pairing Probe labeled with radioactivity VII B 2. Unknown Gene Product • • • Based on co-inheritance of gene of interest (unknown) and molecular marker If co-inherited, then linked Molecular markers are typically DNA sequences with no known function Molecular Markers include: • RFLP’s (Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms) • VNTR (Variable Number of Tandem Repeats) = minisatellite DNA 13 • Microsatellite DNA (dinucleotide repeats) VNTR and Microsatellite DNA also called • STR (Short Tandem Repeats) • SSLP (Short Sequence Length Polymorphisms) RFLP for Homozygote RFLP for Heterozygote VNTR for Heterozygote VII B 2. Unknown Gene Product • • • Molecular markers are diploid (one locus), inherited in Mendelian fashion Examine co-inheritance of molecular marker and gene of interest in pedigree Note: 1cM is approximately 1million bp of DNA • Which band pattern is coinherited with the dominant phenotype? Huntington Disease Pedigree 14 VII B 3. LOD Scores • • • • • • • • • • • • Human pedigrees typically have limited numbers of progeny How can reliable recombination frequencies be found? Combine data from different matings/pedigrees Calculate LOD scores LOD = Log of Odds “Odds” are probabilities of two alternative events for 2 loci that generally recombine: – – Independent Assortment Linkage with Recombination Calculate ratio of RF with linkage / RF with Ind. Asst. Then calculate log of ratio LOD of 3 or greater typically interpreted as evidence of linkage at a specific recombination frequency 6 progeny 4 parental patterns 2 recombinant patterns Expected Proportions of Parentals & Recombinants at Given RF • Independent Assortment (RF = 50) = 0.25 x 0.25 x 0.25 x 0.25 x 0.25 x 0.25 x B = 0.00024 x B where B = # possible birth orders for 4 parentals and 2 recombinant offspring • For RF = 0.2 0.4 x 0.1 x 0.4 x 0.4 x 0.1 x 0.4 x B = 0.00026 x B where B = # possible birth orders for 4 parentals and 2 recombinant offspring Thus ratio of the two probabilities = (0.00026 x B) / (0.00024 x B) = 1.08 • Hypothesis of RF = 0.2 is 1.08 times as likely as hypothesis of Independent Assortment Last updated 31 October 2003 15