* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Evolution of Multinationals` Responses to Climate Change
Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Climate Change conference wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in New Zealand wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Views on the Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Integrating Climate Change with Core Business Activities Jonatan Pinkse & Ans Kolk University of Amsterdam Business School The Netherlands Introducing business and climate change • Initial business responses merely political: – At first most large firms opposed policy initiatives to cut greenhouse gas emissions, but since the inception of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol increasingly more firms are in favor • Gradual emergence of market responses: – Firms are starting to develop ‘climate-friendly’ technologies – Firms start to engage in emissions trading and other Kyoto mechanisms • Aim of our paper: – Analyze to what extent firms integrate climate change with their core business activities Integration of climate change • Commonly business response understood in terms of mitigation: reducing greenhouse gas emissions, e.g. improving energy efficiency – Usually only minor changes in the production process • But, do firms also choose for integration of their concern for climate change into their mainstream business activities? • And, to what extent does climate change motivate firms to modify their core business activities? A dynamic capabilities framework • Dynamic capabilities: competence to renew existing capabilities to maintain a fit with changing environment • Whether firms appear to integrate climate change with their core business depends on: – Nature of climate-induced dynamic capabilities • Green or conventional? – Origin of climate-induced dynamic capabilities • Geographic spread: global, regional, domestic? – Spillover effects throughout value chain • Aimed at upstream (suppliers) and/or downstream (sales) activities Data & Method • Analysis of Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) 2004 questionnaire data of Global 500 firms • 218 multinationals publicly responded to CDP • Using content analysis with inductive coding, the data were scrutinized for activities that: – Form a response to the climate change issue – Fundamentally change current business practices – Are likely to have a significant impact on firm competitiveness Findings (1) • Firms follow distinctive pathways towards: – Technological (conventional) capabilities • Towards similar technologies (automotive) • Towards different technologies (oil & gas) – Organizational (green) capabilities • Exploitation of existing capabilities (utilities, finance) • New capabilities (emissions trading; in some cases only) • Activities undertaken by multinationals from all three regions of the Triad – US/EU/Japan (regulation not decisive) • Much cooperation for technological development: particularly with firms and research institutes in home country Findings (2) • Organizational capabilities potentially more locationbound than technological capabilities – E.g. emissions trading only where such systems exist and firms/sectors are included – Technology usually incorporated in products so better transferable • More opportunities in downstream activities, but • Worldwide marketing of technology-based products problematic – E.g. when an infrastructure is required (case of marketable hydrogen car) Conclusions • Integration still limited, some first steps for the long run in a few industries only • A strategic reorientation towards sustainability still utopia • But, quite some firms are developing different kinds of technological and/or organizational capabilities, mostly green sometimes conventional • In doing so, multinationals mainly rely on existing capabilities in making incremental changes