Download Tissue Engineering for In Vitro Analysis of Matrix Metalloproteinases

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup

Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup

Genomics wikipedia , lookup

Transcription factor wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics in stem-cell differentiation wikipedia , lookup

DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup

Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup

Cell-free fetal DNA wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup

DNA polymerase wikipedia , lookup

Replisome wikipedia , lookup

Gene desert wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics in learning and memory wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup

Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup

Saethre–Chotzen syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Gene wikipedia , lookup

NEDD9 wikipedia , lookup

Epigenomics wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

Point mutation wikipedia , lookup

Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup

Genome editing wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Primary transcript wikipedia , lookup

Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
From: Tissue Engineering for In Vitro Analysis of Matrix Metalloproteinases in the Pathogenesis of Keloid
Lesions
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(6):448-456. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2013.1211
Figure Legend:
Type I Bovine Collagen In Vitro ModelLetters indicate statistical significance from HS27 at corresponding time point (P < .05 e and
P < .001d); plus signs, statistical significance from day 2 of same cell type (P < .05c, P < .01a, and P < .001b). A, Schematic of type I
bovine collagen in vitro model. Polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) was mixed with type I collagen fibrils before encapsulation of
fibroblasts (HS27 and keloid fibroblasts) through UV photopolymerization. B, Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction
demonstrated that keloid fibroblasts had increased type I collagen gene expression compared with normal fibroblasts. C, DNA
Date
of download:
4/29/2017
quantification
normalized
to dry weight indicated decreasing trend over time. D, Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content by both
fibroblast types normalized to DNA demonstrated increased GAG production from keloid fibroblasts. E, Total collagen content by
From: Tissue Engineering for In Vitro Analysis of Matrix Metalloproteinases in the Pathogenesis of Keloid
Lesions
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(6):448-456. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2013.1211
Figure Legend:
Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction of MMP Gene Expressions From Normal and Keloid Fibroblasts in the PEGCol1 ModelNo obvious differences in trends were observed between HS27 and keloid fibroblasts. β-Actin was the housekeeping
gene.
Date of download: 4/29/2017
From: Tissue Engineering for In Vitro Analysis of Matrix Metalloproteinases in the Pathogenesis of Keloid
Lesions
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(6):448-456. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2013.1211
Figure Legend:
Matrigel In Vitro ModelLetters indicate statistical significance from HS27 at corresponding time point (P < .05 c, P < .01e, and
P < .001b); plus signs, statistical significance from day 1 of same cell type (P < .05a, P < .01d, and P < .001f). A, Schematic of 3dimensional Matrigel constructs. B, Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction of type I collagen from both HS27 and keloid
fibroblasts after culture in Matrigel demonstrates the expected higher gene expression from keloid fibroblasts. C, DNA content
decreased in both fibroblast types as time increased. D, Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content was more significantly produced from
Date
download: than
4/29/2017
keloidoffibroblasts
HS27, resulting in a time-dependent increase. E, Total collagen content normalized to DNA also
demonstrated more extracellular matrix production from keloid fibroblasts than HS27.
From: Tissue Engineering for In Vitro Analysis of Matrix Metalloproteinases in the Pathogenesis of Keloid
Lesions
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(6):448-456. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2013.1211
Figure Legend:
Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction of MMP Gene Expressions From Normal and Keloid Fibroblasts After In Vitro 3Dimensional Culture in MatrigelSignificant differences were observed in MMP9 and MMP13 gene expressions between HS27 and
keloid fibroblasts. β-Actin was the housekeeping gene.
Date of download: 4/29/2017
From: Tissue Engineering for In Vitro Analysis of Matrix Metalloproteinases in the Pathogenesis of Keloid
Lesions
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(6):448-456. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2013.1211
Figure Legend:
Effect of Decorin on Keloid Fibroblasts in the Matrigel ModelLetters indicate statistical significance from HS27 at corresponding time
point (P < .01b); plus signs, statistical significance from day 7 of same cell type (P < .001a). A, DNA quantification normalized to
respective dry weights indicated decrease in both conditions as time increased. B, Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content normalized to
DNA demonstrated that the presence of decorin prevented an increase in the matrix component production. C, Total collagen
content normalized to DNA demonstrated a similar trend as the GAG data, although not statistically significant. D, Reverse
Date
of download: 4/29/2017
transcription–polymerase
chain reaction of type I collagen and MMP genes that were affected by the presence of decorin
administered to keloid fibroblasts. Significant downregulations in type I collagen, MMP1, and MMP13 were observed at day 21,
From: Tissue Engineering for In Vitro Analysis of Matrix Metalloproteinases in the Pathogenesis of Keloid
Lesions
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(6):448-456. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2013.1211
Figure Legend:
Site-Specific Gene ExpressionsA, Different sites from which keloid fibroblasts were isolated from the shoulder lesion for comparison
of MMP gene expressions among the different sites: i, superficial side; ii, superficial center; iii, deep center; and iv, keratinocytes.
Keratinocytes were also isolated from the shoulder lesion. B, Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction of MMP gene
expressions from primary fibroblasts isolated from different sites of a keloid lesion and compared with the corresponding
keratinocytes that lined the epidermis of the lesion, a mixed fibroblast population from the ear, and normal fibroblasts isolated from
Date
of download:
4/29/2017 from regions closest to the margins of the original wound and the excision site (ie, superficial side and
an eyebrow
lift. Fibroblasts
deep center) had higher expressions of MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, and MMP9 compared with those farthest away from the wound