* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Cannabinoid Signaling and Lipid Rafts
Survey
Document related concepts
Mechanosensitive channels wikipedia , lookup
Purinergic signalling wikipedia , lookup
Endomembrane system wikipedia , lookup
NMDA receptor wikipedia , lookup
Cell membrane wikipedia , lookup
List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Lipopolysaccharide wikipedia , lookup
Lipid bilayer wikipedia , lookup
G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup
Theories of general anaesthetic action wikipedia , lookup
Model lipid bilayer wikipedia , lookup
VLDL receptor wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Lipid signaling wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Cannabinoid Signaling and Lipid Rafts More evidence is showing that CB1 receptor binding, signaling, anandamide transport, and 2-AG synthesis is influenced by lipid rafts. The plasma membrane is a highly disordered phospholipid by-layer that consists of compartmentalized microdomains. These microdomains that are enriched in cholesterol, sphingolipids, and arachidonic acid are referred to as lipid rafts. Rafts can be conceived as platforms that collect different components, such as receptors, effectors, and enzymes that make for more efficient cellular signaling (Daienes, E. et al., 2007). Rafts are able to modulate the activity of a number of G-protein coupled receptors, for many GPCR’s have been found to be sequestered in lipid rafts. It was first suggested that endocannabinoid signaling was lipid raft dependent when studies showed that depleting membrane cholesterol induced apoptosis in a variety of cell lines. These studies showed that reduced membrane cholesterol reduced AEA binding to the cells. This finding supports other studies which have found that lipid raft perturbation enhanced CB1 receptor binding to CB1 specific antibodies, and changed CB1 receptor trafficking (Bari et al, 2008) Also, it has been observed that CB1-dependent signaling is significantly reduced by cholesterol enrichment, which increases the rigidity of lipid rafts thus reducing the rafts’ stability (Simons, R., Ehehalt, R., 2002; Mitter, D. et al., 2003). On the contrary, no effects of raft disruptions on CB2 binding and signaling has been found (Bari, M., 2006). This prompts us to ask the questions: What structural components of CB1 receptors specifically interact with lipid rafts; and how can raft disruption influence CB1 binding and signaling? Evidence leads us to believe that the juxtamembrane segment of the receptor may be a critical component for the CB1 receptor to interact with lipid rafts, as it mediates interaction with phospholipid molecules with the lipid raft itself (Pike, L., 2003). Furthermore, omega-3 fatty acids and polyunsaturated acids seem to be important in the elastic properties of lipid rafts that elicit tighter interactions with regions of the CB1 receptor (Feller, S.E., Gawrich, K., 2005). AEA is a very flexible molecule that may be influenced by the surrounding environment, thus suggesting the influence of lipid rafts on CB1 receptor responsiveness to AEA. The involvement of lipid rafts in the dynamics of AEA and 2-AG synthesis, degradation and metabolism have been explored in cultured glioma cells, yet few studies have examined lipid raft function in neuronal cell types (Bari et al., 2005, 2006). A recent study found that the disruption of lipid rafts in the striatum negatively affected 2-AG metabolism but not AEA (Maccarrone, M., 2009). Namely, disrupting the cholesterol content in striatal slices of mice failed to change the activity of NAPE-PLD or FAAH. Depletion of cholesterol in lipid rafts negatively altered the activity of the AEA transporter, AMT. On the other hand, the activity of the 2-AG synthesizing enzyme, DAGL was significantly increased after treating striatal slices, yet the activity of MAGL was not altered. The transport of 2-AG across the plasma membrane was downregulated, which coincides with the finding the cholesterol depletion downregulates AEA transport. Another major finding of this study is that disruption of cholesterol in lipid rafts enhances binding and activity of CB1 receptors in the striatum. Other studies, as well, have found that lipid raft perturbation enhanced CB1 receptor binding to CB1 specific antibodies and changed CB1 receptor trafficking (Bari et al., 2008). Lipid rafts can also negatively affect receptors through sequestration or internalization. Typically, the desensitization of CB1 receptors is mediated by the phosphorylation of serine residues in the C-terminus and third intracellular loop by means of specific kinases. Phosphorylation targets the receptor for internalization and uncouples the receptor for the G-protein by recruiting beta arrestin 2. The kinases and beta arrestin 2 are dependent of lipid rafts therefore it is conceivable that disruption of lipid rafts could influence receptor desensitization (Dainese, E. et al., 2007). Further studies have been able to show that changes in diet have an effect on membrane composition, and that obese rats fed a diet with a high amount of fish oil (high in omega 3 polyunsaturated fat) had significantly higher amounts of lineolic acid, EPA and DPA, and a lower proportion of arachidonic acid and ratio of omega 6/omega 3polyunsaturate fatty acids in lipid rafts isolated from spenocytes (Ruth, M., et al, 2009). The next section of this review, will take a closer look in the normal function of the endocannabinoid system in appetite and energy metabolism, as well as, the disruption of the endocannabinoid system in obesity and its potential systemic effects.