Download Natural infection of Run1-positive vines by naïve genotypes of

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Fetal origins hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Gene desert wikipedia , lookup

Genetically modified crops wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup

Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Selective breeding wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Natural infection of Run1-positive vines by naïve genotypes of Erysiphe necator
Lance Cadle-Davidson, Siraprapa Mahanil, David Gadoury, Pál Kozma, and Bruce Reisch
Vitis 50: 173-175 (2011)
Background. The Run1 (Resistance to Uncinula necator 1) gene is a highly effective control for
grape powdery mildew. Discovered in muscadine grapes (Vitis rotundifolia) of the southeastern
United States, the gene causes localized cell death at the site of fungal invasion, pre-empting
the establishment of an infection. Through
breeding, the gene has been incorporated into
diverse grape varieties, including cold hardy
breeding lines adapted to New York growing
conditions. To determine if the resistance
provided by the Run1 gene would be stable in
commercial vineyards, the breeding lines were
tested in Geneva, N.Y, in the center of diversity for
the powdery mildew pathogen, Erysiphe necator.
Experimental design. Seeds from a cross including
a Run1 gene were obtained from Pál Kozma in
Hungary. Seedlings were grown without fungicide
control to evaluate resistance to powdery mildew,
and the best-performing seedlings were crossed to
breeding lines adapted to New York State growing
conditions. Over 1000 seedlings were grown and
evaluated for disease resistance; 306 resistant
lines were then planted to a vineyard for further
Figure 1. Breeding lines growing in a vineyard not
sprayed with fungicide. Vines without the Run1
powdery mildew resistance gene (top photo) were
severely defoliated. Run1 containing vines (bottom
photo) had healthy canopies despite signs of
powdery mildew infection on individual leaves.
evaluation and comparison to susceptible control vines. Vines were rated for disease
(percentage of leaf area infected with powdery or downy mildew) for three seasons, in October
2008-2010, and the leaves of infected individuals were collected in October 2010 and incubated
in the lab to allow fungal infections to progress. The development of the fungus was observed
with a microscope. DNA was isolated from 150 vines to test for the presence of the Run1 gene.
Results and conclusions:
•
Powdery mildew infection was lower on Run1 vines (12%) than control vines (100%).
•
The average disease severity was also lower on Run1 vines (2.5) than control vines (4.04.8)
•
Evidence of powdery mildew
infection was visible on leaves,
petioles and canes (Figure 2).
•
Prior to the planting of the test
vines in Geneva in 2001, local
powdery mildew populations
were “naïve”—they had not
encountered Run1 resistance—
because the gene is only found in
Figure 2. Close-up of an individual Run1-containing vine. Powdery
mildew infection of the canes is visible as dead, dark brown tissue.
muscadine grapes whose range is
at least 800 km away. Despite this, within a decade, isolates capable of overcoming the
resistance had emerged.
•
Even though disease was present on individual leaves, the Run1 vines had full foliage in
October, when control vines were defoliated, even without the use of fungicides (Figure
1).
The bottom line. Run1 has significant commercial value in decreasing the need for fungicides in
vineyards, but the grape community will need to work together to protect it for future use
through breeding strategies, such as the incorporation of additional resistance genes along with
Run1, and careful management of disease on Run1 vines.
Author: Amanda Garris