* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Quantum Problems 1. Consider a quantum system whose state at
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Quantum decoherence wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Quantum dot wikipedia , lookup
Spin (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup
Quantum fiction wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics) wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Identical particles wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
Quantum group wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Quantum Problems 1. Consider a quantum system whose state at time t1 is given by |Ψ(t1 )i = √12 (|ψ1 i + |ψ2 i), where |ψ1 i and |ψ2 i are energy eigenstates with eigenvalues E1 and E2 respectively. (E1 6= E2 .) (a) Calculate the uncertainty ∆E of the system, as well as the first time t2 > t1 at which |Ψ(t2 )i becomes orthogonal to |Ψ(t1 )i. Show that (∆E)(∆t) ≥ h̄, where ∆t = t2 − t1 . (b) Assume that the above system consists of a particle of mass M moving in the Coulomb potental V (r) = −e2 /r in three spatial dimensions, and that |ψ1 i = |ψ1,0,0 i and |ψ2 i = |ψ2,1,0 i, where |ψn,`,m i is the energy eigenstate with principal quantum number n, angular momentum quantum number `, and magnetic quantum number m. Find ∆E and ∆t in (a) as a function of M , e, and h̄. Also calculate the time-evolving expectation values hL2 i(t) and hLz i(t) for all t ≥ t1 , where L2 and Lz are the usual angular momentum operators. 2. Two measurements are made in rapid succession on a quantum system originally in the state |ψi. The first measurement is of an observable B, and the second is of a non-degenerate observable A. Assume that the first measurement changes the state of the system, and that immediately after the second measurement the system is again in the state |ψi. (a) Prove that [A, B] 6= 0̂. (b) Show, via an explicit example, that the physical situation described above can actually occur. (Suggestion: Try this for a two-dimensional Hilbert space.) What is the probability of your particular scenario occuring? (0) 3. Consider a quantum system with Hamiltonian operator H = H0 + λH1 , and let |ψn i be a (0) particular non-degenerate eigenstate of H0 with corresponding eigenvalue En . Assume λ 1. (0) (0) (a) Show that if the first-order corrections in λ to both |ψn i and En vanish, then all higher order corrections to both vanish as well. (Hint: Prove that if the first-order corrections vanish, (0) then H1 |ψn i is the zero vector. In this problem, as is standard, we have chosen the first-order (0) (0) correction to |ψn i to be orthogonal to |ψn i.) (b) In the special case of single particle motion in one dimension with H0 = p̂2 /2M + V0 (x̂) and H1 = V1 (x̂), show that if the first-order corrections in (a) vanish, then H1 = 0̂. 4. Calculate the degree of degeneracy of the indicated energy level for the following multiparticle systems in three spatial dimensions. (a) The ground level of 19 identical spin 1/2 fermions moving in an external isotropic harmonic oscillator potential. (b) The second excited level of 2 identical spinless bosons confined inside a cubical box. 5. Consider a particle of mass M moving in the three-dimensional spherically symmetric potential V (r) = −A e−βr , where A, β > 0. (a) Show that for “small enough” values of β, the system possesses at least one bound state. (Hint: Use the variational method with trial ground state wavefunction ψ(r) = N e−αr , where α > 0 and N is a normalization constant. No minimization with respect to α is necessary.) (b) Do you expect the system to have a bound state for all values of β? Why or why not?