* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Kennedy Graham
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Emissions trading wikipedia , lookup
Paris Agreement wikipedia , lookup
Decarbonisation measures in proposed UK electricity market reform wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup
Kyoto Protocol and government action wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Carbon governance in England wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup
NZ Emission Trading Scheme: How agriculture, horticulture & forestry will cope with what is required Green Party Viewpoint Kennedy Graham, MP NZIAHS Forum, Lincoln University, 22 August 2012 Authorised by Kennedy Graham, Parliament Buildings, Wellington. Overview I. What is required (globally; nationally)? II. Coping (nationally) - NZ ETS III. Agric., hortic., forestry ‘coping’ IV. Other countries ‘coping’ I. What is required? Not just problem of climate change - Ecological crisis ― E.F. crossed Earth-share (= bio-prod. capacity pc) in 1981; overshoot: 18% in ’92; 50% in ‘10. ― Over-consuming planet’s resources = permanent ecological theft from the next generation. ― US lifestyle sustainable population = 2.2 b. [2012 = 7 b., 2050 = 9 b.] ― Biodiversity loss = 100 - 1000 times above natural rate. ― GHG emissions rising = ‘dangerous anthrop. interf. with climate system’ MGT (13.9°C) + 2°C (difficult) to +6°C (intolerable). Global Ecological Crisis Inter-locking series of 9 planetary boundaries. 3 exceeded: climate change biodiversity nitrogen removal 1 recovering: stratospheric ozone depletion 3 approaching boundary freshwater ocean acidification land use 2 lack sufficient data chemical pollution atmospheric aerosol loading What is required (focusing only on climate change) 1992 UNFCCC Objective: — stabilisation of GHG concentrations in atmosphere at level avoids dangerous anthropogenic CC 2010 Cancun COP-MOP UNFCCC objective = + 2°C (MGT) above ore-industrial level (1750) [0.8°C already; 0.7°C committed = 1.5°C certain = 0.5° left] = 450 ppm concentration Global carbon budget (80% prob. of + 2°C) Potsdam: 565 Gt. Further GHG emissions WWF: 1990-2100 GCB = 1600 Gt CO2e (net); 2009-2100 = 870 Gt.; = 9.5 Gt /yr. (=20% of current) Known global fossil fuel (FF) reserves = 2,795 Gt. Therefore: To avoid dangerous Cl.Ch. = can extract / emit only 20% FF reserves = switch to low-carbon econ. (betw. 2030 – ‘50) What is required (focusing only on climate change) Global emissions reduction curve (annual emission levels) Year CO2e (Gt. = billion tonnes) Required [2°C] 1990 [34] 2010 48 2020 UNEP (WWF) 44 (36) 2050 UNEP (WWF) 26/21 (7) BAU Voluntary Pledges Emission Gap 56 50 6 Current global emissions profile Carbon Dioxide 77% Energy (stationary) 25% Methane 15% Transport 14% Nitrous Oxide 7% Deforestation 11% Others 1% Agriculture 14% World Resources Initiative (2009) What is required (focusing only on climate change) – NZ New Zealand Emissions (million tonnes, Mt) Actual Projected 1990 2010 2020 2050 Gross 61 76 77 / 79 / 88 LULUCF - 19 - 20 +2 / - 16 / -25 Net 42 56 79 / 63 / 63 NZ 5th Comm., Table 5.1 (2009) / Review Panel Report (2011) Responsibility Target NZ Voluntary Pledge: 2020 52 Mt. 15 % 2050 30 Mt. 50 % (below 1990 levels) From 77 to 52 (33%) in transition period 2012-20: through (KP2?): (a) emission cuts (b) net removals (LULUCF) (c) international credits From 77 to 30 (61%) in ‘global legal agreement’ (LCA) 2012-50 NB: NZ pledge = inadequate for ‘global emissions gap’ NZ ETS: NZ = 100% 2008-12 (av. ann.) / 1990 Kyoto Protocol Performance (2008-12 = 5 years) = 61.9 x 5 = 310 Mt. Mt. % Energy (incl. liq. fuels) 162 44% Industry 23 6% 1/1/13 Waste 10 3% Post-’15 Agriculture 171 47% Emissions EIF 1/7/10 Total gross 1/1/08 Forestry (92 sinks – 6 defor.) 366 86 Total net (incl. LULUCF) 280 Assigned Balance Initial AAUs 310 Less unit transactions/PFSI 5 Proj. assigned amnt. bal. 303 NZ Net Position (units) (Assigned balance > emissions) 23.2 NZ Net Position (NZ$) (€5.03 = NZ$8.27) +$192 m. 50% 50% NZ Sectoral Analysis 1990 2007 2010 2020 Energy/transport/industry/waste 29.6 39.6 39.2 37.8 Agriculture 31.3 35.8 36.9 39.1 Total (gross) 60.9 75.4 76.1 76.9 Forestry -19.2 -18.5 -20.1 +1.9 Total with LULUCF (net) 41.7 56.9 56.0 78.8 NOTE: (1990-2020) 1. Gross emissions +26% 2. Net emissions + 89% 3. Agric. Emissions + 25% ETS – Outline ‘08 Act ‘09 Act ‘11 Review ‘12 Bill Price cap ($/tonne) $25 $12.50 $30 / ’13 $50 / ‘17 $12.50 indef. Free allocations 60% / 90% 60% / 90% Phase-out 8.3% 1.3% EIF Forestry 1/1/08 En./Ind./Fish 1/1/10 1/7/10 Transport 1/1/11 1/7/10 Agriculture 1/1/13 1/1/15 1:2 1/1/15 1:1 1/1/19 no date ETS – Latest Development Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading and Other Matters) Amendment Bill 2011 Review 2012 Bill Agriculture 1. Mand. reptng. 1/1/12; surr. 1/1/15) Remove date for surr. obligations 2. PoO = farmer, not processor No longer relevant 3. Free allocations = 90% @ 1.3% from 1/1/16 4. Promote TT for existing mitigation options ETS – Latest Development 2011 Review 2012 Bill Forestry 1. Change forestry rules, unilaterally Yes 2. Pre-Kyoto offset planting Yes 3. Claw-back for 2nd tranche of preKyoto Yes Conclusion: 2009 weakening of a weak ’08 Act, further weakened by 2012 Bill = will not meet the test of ‘what is required’ The 2012 Bill Objectives: 1. Ensure ETS ‘more effectively supports NZG economic growth priorities’ 2. ETS flexibility for transition (2013-20) 3. Improve ETS administration 4. Change current treatment of synthetic gases Primary Measures: 1. Maintain 1 for 2 surrender obligation beyond 2012, indefinitely 2. Maintain $25 price cap, indefinitely 3. Agriculture: defer indefinitely 4. Forestry: (a) offsetting for pre-Kyoto foresters (b) Claw back 2nd tranche of allocation to pre-Kyoto foresters The 2012 Bill Primary Measures (cont.): 5. Allow auctioning on NZUs allocated, or covered under a future global agreement 6. Extend ban on export of NZUs (except foresters) 7. Remove requirement to ‘back’ all NZUs issued, with a Kyoto unit 8. Align NZ-ETS with latest international-accepted GWP potentials (forcing metrics) 9. Remove ETS obligation on imports of synthetic GHGs (SGGs) & substitute levy (cars; goods) 10. Other measures pertaining to SGGs Other Countries ‘Coping’ - Sweden EU Target Sweden = 20 % = 40 % reduction in national emissions not covered by the EU scheme 9% drop in gross emissions from 1990 to 2007 and average economic growth of 2.3% per annum when New Zealand’s growth of 3.1% over that period was based on a 30% increase in gross emissions Might the reason be that Sweden has, to quote its Government, “succeeded in breaking the link between economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions” – that is, succeeded with decoupling when New Zealand demonstrably has not? Other Countries ‘Coping’ Gross emissions (agric. emissions) Economic growth Dairy herd Sweden, Ireland, NZ (1990-2007) Sweden Ireland - 9% + 25% - 10% - 7% +2.3% -34% ‘reductions’ NZ +30% +16% +3.1% +45% “Sweden has broken the link betw. econ. growth & GHG emissions.” = decoupling Measures carbon tax ETS mkt. pr. (NZ$175) ($5) Targets (2020) EU = 20-30% Sweden = 40% EU = 20-30% 10-20% Ireland – Agriculture Measures Methane & Nitrous Oxide Reductions 1. Single Payment Scheme 2. Rural Environment Protection Scheme 3. Organic Farming (1% agricultural land; target = increase 5% p.a.) 4. Cross-compliance 5. Disadvantaged Areas Compensatory Allowance Scheme 6. Lower Slaughter Age 7. Commonage Framework Plans Animal Husbandry Animal Diet Research Manure Management & Agricultural Soils 1. Legislation 2. Nitrates Directive 3. Anearobic Digestion 4. Bio-energy Green Policy Target: 40% reduction (2020/1990) = Electricity Industry Transport Agriculture Dairy stocking rate 2.2 NO reduction (sheep, beef) 0.5 Forestry 25,000 ha/y pine/exotics 10.1 5,000 ha/y indigenous 0.8 Pest control (219,000 DOC) 8.7 Pest control (priv. indig.) 2.0 5.3 1.9 4.7 2.7 21.6 48.0 Mt. 36.2 Mt. from domestic