* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download How Do We Form Our Impressions of Others?
Group cohesiveness wikipedia , lookup
Vested interest (communication theory) wikipedia , lookup
James M. Honeycutt wikipedia , lookup
In-group favoritism wikipedia , lookup
Carolyn Sherif wikipedia , lookup
Interpersonal attraction wikipedia , lookup
First impression (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Interpersonal relationship wikipedia , lookup
Belongingness wikipedia , lookup
Self-categorization theory wikipedia , lookup
Albert Bandura wikipedia , lookup
Relational aggression wikipedia , lookup
Communication in small groups wikipedia , lookup
Implicit attitude wikipedia , lookup
Impression formation wikipedia , lookup
Group dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Attribution bias wikipedia , lookup
Attitude (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
False consensus effect wikipedia , lookup
Social tuning wikipedia , lookup
Social perception wikipedia , lookup
Social Psychology 12 Questions to Consider: How Do Attitudes Guide Behavior? How Do We Form Our Impressions of Others? How Do Others Influence Us? When Do We Harm or Help Others? What Determines the Quality of Relationships? How Do Attitudes Guide Behavior? We Form Attitudes through Experience and Socialization Behaviors Are Consistent with Strong Attitudes Discrepancies Lead to Dissonance Attitudes Can Be Changed through Persuasion Critical Thinking Skill: Making Sound Arguments Learning Objectives Identify the processes by which attitudes are formed and changed. Recognize situations in which people will most likely behave in ways consistent with their attitudes. We Form Attitudes through Experience and Socialization Opinions, beliefs, and feelings are called attitudes Shaped by social context Play an important role in how we evaluate and interact with other people Direct experience of, or exposure to, things shapes attitudes We Form Attitudes Through Experience and Socialization The mere exposure effect Attitudes can be conditioned The more we are exposed to something, the more likely we are to like it Advertisers take advantage of this Attitudes are shaped through socialization — parents, teachers, peers, and others Behaviors Are Consistent with Strong Attitudes An attitude is more likely to predict behavior, to be consistent over time, and to be resistant to change: The stronger it is The more personally relevant it is The more specific it is If it is formed through direct experience Behaviors Are Consistent with Strong Attitudes Attitude accessibility predicts behavior consistent with the attitude Explicit attitudes: Those you are aware of and can report Implicit attitudes Those you are not aware of May be associated with the brain areas involved with implicit memories Implicit Association Test Discrepancies Lead to Disonance Leon Festinger proposed that cognitive dissonance occurs when there is a contradiction between two attitudes or between an attitude and a behavior Dissonance causes anxiety and tension; motivates people to reduce the dissonance People reduce dissonance by changing their attitudes or behaviors Or they rationalize or trivialize the discrepancy Discrepancies Lead to Disonance Postdecisional dissonance: Occurs when forced to choose between two or three attractive options Once the choice is made, negative qualities of the nonchosen options are emphasized Discrepancies Lead to Disonance Attitude change: Researchers have found that people are likely to change their attitudes as a result of dissonance and to provide justifications In Festinger’s dissonance studies, participants performed an extremely boring task and then reported to other participants how enjoyable it was. Some participants were paid $20 to lie, and some were paid $1. Attitudes Can Be Changed through Persuasion In the elaboration likelihood model persuasion leads to attitude change in two ways: The central route People pay attention to arguments, consider all the information, and use rational cognitive processes Leads to strong attitudes that last over time and are resistant to change Attitudes Can Be Changed through Persuasion The peripheral route People minimally process the message Leads to more impulsive action Three critical factors influence the extent to which a message is persuasive: Source Content Receiver The Elaboration Likelihood Model Exercise When people are motivated to consider information carefully, they process it via the central route, and their attitude changes reflect cognitive elaboration (left). When they are not motivated, they process information via the peripheral route, and their attitude changes reflect the presence or absence of shallow peripheral cues (right). Critical Thinking Skill Making sound arguments An argument must have a conclusion and reasons Person strengthens his or her argument by acknowledging alternative opinions Arguments may include a qualifier, constraint, or restrictions It is important to weigh both strengths and weaknesses or argument How Do We Form Our Impressions of Others? Nonverbal Actions and Expressions Affect Our Impressions We Make Attributions about Others Critical Thinking Skill: Identifying and Avoiding the Actor/Observer Discrepancy Stereotypes Are Based on Automatic Categorization Stereotypes Can Lead to Prejudice Cooperation Can Reduce Prejudice Learning Objectives Differentiate among stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination. Anticipate attributional biases likely to emerge in social situations. Nonverbal Actions and Expressions Affect Our Impressions First impressions are greatly influenced by nonverbal cues Facial expression, especially eye contact, is one of the first things people notice Interpreting facial expression may vary by culture Nonverbal Actions and Expressions Affect Our Impressions Thin slices of behavior Accurate judgments can be made based on only a few seconds of observation; this is referred to as impression formation Happiness, hostility, anger, and sexual orientation have been accurately predicted by observing a few seconds of how a person walks After watching a 10-second clip of a figural outline such as this one, participants correctly guessed the figure’s sexual orientation at a better-than-chance rate. We Make Attributions about Others Attributions are people’s causal explanations for events or actions, including other people’s behavior People are motivated to draw inferences in part by a basic need for order and predictability in their lives Just world hypothesis We Make Attributions about Others Personal (internal) attributions: Situational (external) attributions: Within a person, such as abilities, traits, moods, or effort Outside events, accidents, or the actions of other people Attributions can also be stable over time versus variable, or controllable versus uncontrollable. We Make Attributions about Others Fundamental attribution error: We tend to overemphasize the importance of personality traits and underestimate the importance of situation Actor-observer discrepancy Differences in Eastern vs. Western societies Critical Thinking Skill Identifying and Avoiding the Actor/Observer Discrepancy People believe that individual attributes underlie other people’s actions but see their own actions as caused by circumstance It is important to be aware of this tendency in order to judge more fairly and take sufficient responsibility Stereotypes Are Based on Automatic Categorization Attitudes and beliefs about groups are stereotypes Cognitive schemas that help us organize information about people on the basis of their membership in certain groups Stereotypes Are Based on Automatic Categorization Stereotypes are maintained by a number of processes: We focus on information that confirms the stereotypes We remember information that matches our stereotypes leading to an illusory correlation in which people believe that a relationship exists when it does not Subtyping Stereotypes Are Based on Automatic Categorization Self-fulfilling effects: Self-fulfilling prophecy Rosenthal’s study of “academic blooming” Stereotype threat Decreased performance due to (1) physiological stress affecting prefrontal functioning; (2) a tendency for people to think about their performance, which can distract them from the task; and (3) attempts to suppress negative thoughts and emotions, which require a great deal of effort Stereotypes Can Lead to Prejudice Negative stereotypes of groups lead to: Prejudice Affective or attitudinal responses associated with stereotypes, usually involving negative judgments about people on the basis of their group membership Discrimination Unjustified and inappropriate treatment of people as a result of prejudice Stereotypes Can Lead to Prejudice Ingroup/outgroup bias: Some people are more likely to develop associations between aversive events and members of an outgroup Those people appear to be more likely to be racially biased. The formation of ingroup and outgroup distinctions appear to occur early in life Stereotypes Can Lead to Prejudice Outgroup homogeneity effect Ingroup favoritism Women are quicker than men to form ingroup bias perhaps as a result of evolution The killing of Amadou Diallo by New York City police officers is used as an example of how implicit biases may impact behavior and how extensive training can reduce this implicit bias Stereotypes Can Lead to Prejudice Inhibiting stereotypes: Research suggests that negative stereotypes can be countered through learning and self-regulation Cooperation Can Reduce Prejudice Working together for a greater purpose may help people overcome group hostilities Muzafer Sherif Demonstrated that competition created hostility, prejudice, and discrimination Cooperation among groups to achieve a superordinate goal eliminated these problems Eliot Aronson Jigsaw classroom How Do Others Influence Us? Groups Influence Individual Behavior We Conform to Social Norms We Are Compliant We Are Obedient to Authority Learning Objectives Differentiate among conformity, compliance, and obedience. Apply principles of social influence to common educational situations. Groups Influence Individual Behavior Social facilitation involves three basic steps: Organisms are genetically predisposed to become aroused by the presence of others of their own species Arousal leads to increased performance of the dominant response in that environment Simple dominant responses are improved but more complex responses are impaired because the presence of others may interfere with cognition Social Facilitation Exercise The mere presence of other people leads to increased arousal, which in turn favors the dominant response. If this is the correct response, performance is enhanced, but if it is the incorrect response, performance suffers. Groups Influence Individual Behavior Social loafing: People work less hard in a groups when no one person’s efforts are identified Deindividuation: People sometimes lose their individuality when they become part of a group. Occurs when people are not self-aware or when there is diffusion of responsibility Stanford Prison Study Groups Influence Individual Behavior Group decision making: Risky shift effect Group polarization Groupthink has been implicated in such disasters as the Challenger explosion and the George W. Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq We Conform to Social Norms Conforming, or adhering, to social norms or expectations is necessary in a civilized society Autokinetic effect Solomon Asch’s objective line length test We Conform to Social Norms Several factors have been identified that increase conformity Larger group sizes Unanimity of group opinion Universities have attempted to use group norms on drinking to decrease binge drinking A backfire effect can occur when reporting group norms, leading to light drinkers drinking more We Are Compliant Compliance, or going along with a request, is increased when: a person is in a good mood a reason is provided for complying a variety of strategies are used the foot-in-the-door effect the door-in-the-face effect the low-balling strategy We Are Obedient to Authority In the 1960s, Stanley Milgram conducted one of the most controversial studies in social psychology on obedience Nearly two-thirds of participants in Milgram’s study completely obeyed the directives of the experimenter, providing what they believed was a shock that was sufficient to kill the supposed learner Psychiatrists, college sophomores, middle-class adults, and both graduate students and professors in the behavioral sciences offered predictions about the results of Milgram’s experiments. Their predictions were incorrect. We Are Obedient to Authority Later studies have replicated Milgram’s findings suggesting that ordinary people can be coerced into obedience by insistent authorities, even when what they are coerced into goes against the way they would usually behave. When Do We Harm or Help Others? Aggression Can Be Adaptive Aggression Has Social and Cultural Aspects Many Factors May Influence Helping Behavior Some Situations Lead to Bystander Apathy Learning Objectives Classify the evidence as supporting biological, individual-differences, or sociocultural explanations for aggression. Recognize situations in which people are most likely to evidence bystander apathy. Aggression Can Be Adaptive Aggression involves intentional harm to another Biological factors Stimulating or damaging the septum, amygdala, or hypothalamus regions in the brain leads to corresponding changes in the level of aggression that animals display Kluver-Bucy syndrome Aggression Can Be Adaptive Drugs that enhance the activity of serotonin lower aggression, whereas those that interfere with serotonin increase aggressive behaviors Decreased serotonin levels may interfere with good decision making in the face of danger or social threat Male vervet monkeys were given either serotonin enhancers or serotonin blockers. The results suggest serotonin is important in the control of aggressive behavior. Aggression Can Be Adaptive Dollard proposed the frustration-aggression hypothesis: The extent to which people feel frustrated predicts the likelihood that they will be aggressive The cognitive-neoassociationistic model proposes that frustration leads to aggression because it elicits negative emotions Aggression Has Social and Cultural Aspects Violence varies dramatically across cultures and even within cultures at different times Higher levels of violence in the southern United States, for example, may be explained by a culture of honor The culture-of-honor theory of violence supports Bandura’s social-learning theory that much aggressive behavior is learned through social observation of vicarious reward and punishment Many Factors May Influence Helping Behavior Prosocial behaviors provide benefits to those around us and promote positive interpersonal relationships Such behaviors may ensure the survival of the human species as such behaviors improve group functioning and strong groups are more likely to function in an effective manner Many Factors May Influence Helping Behavior Altruism is defined as the providing of help in the absence of apparent rewards for doing so Inclusive fitness Kin selection Reciprocal helping Some Situations Lead to Bystander Apathy Four major reasons have been identified explaining the bystander intervention effect (failure to offer help to someone observed to be in need): First, a diffusion of responsibility occurs, such that people expect other bystanders to help. The greater the number of people who witness someone in need of help, the less likely it is that any of them will step forward. Some Situations Lead to Bystander Apathy Second, people fear making social blunders in an ambiguous situation Third, people are less likely to help when they are anonymous and can remain so Fourth, a cost-benefit trade-off involves how much harm people risk by helping, or what benefits they would have to forgo if they stopped to help Participants waited with two apathetic confederates, with two other naive participants, or alone. This chart records their reactions to smoke filling the room. What Determines the Quality of Relationships? Situational and Personal Factors Influence Friendships Love Is an Important Component of Romantic Relationships Making Love Last Is Difficult Learning Objectives Describe passionate and companionate love. Distinguish between relationships that are likely to last and relationships that are not. Situational and Personal Factors Influence Friendships Proximity, or how often people come into contact, is a prime factor in the development of friendships Birds of a feather: Similarity increases liking Matching principle Situational and Personal Factors Influence Friendships Personal characteristics: Admirable personal characteristics and physical attractiveness increase how much we like another person However, people who seem too perfect make others feel uncomfortable or inadequate Situational and Personal Factors Influence Friendships Physical attractiveness Symmetry of facial features appears to be a prime determinate of what we consider attractive The “What is beautiful is good” stereotype Despite beliefs about physically attractive individuals, objective data is mixed on whether attractive people actually reap benefits of stereotypes Attractive people are similar to less attractive people in intelligence, life satisfaction, and self-esteem Love Is an Important Component of Romantic Relationships Hatfield and Berscheid developed more objective definitions of passionate love (a state of intense longing and sexual desire) and compassionate love (strong commitment to care for and support a partner that develops slowly over time) Love Is an Important Component of Romantic Relationships Passionate love is associated with activity in dopamine reward systems, the same ones involved in drug addiction Compassionate love is based on trust, respect, friendship, and intimacy Attachment style: 60% of adults defined as securely attached, 25% as avoidant, and 11% as anxious-ambivalent Making Love Last Is Difficult In North America, about 50% of marriages end in divorce or separation, often within the first few years In addition, many couples who do not get divorced are unhappy and live together in a constant state of tension or as strangers sharing a house Making Love Last Is Difficult Passionate love declines by 50% from the first to second year of marriage Without the development of compassionate love, many marriages will fail Making Love Last Is Difficult Jealousy and possessiveness: Some degree is found in all cultures, although with variation as to what makes people jealous and how they express it Current estimates suggest that 25% of husbands and 10% of wives have had extramarital sex, figures much less than were reported during the 1960s and 1970s Making Love Last Is Difficult Dealing with conflict: The way a couple deals with conflict often determines whether the relationship will last Gottman describes four interpersonal styles that typically lead to discord and dissolution among couples: Being overly critical, holding the partner in contempt, being defensive, and mentally withdrawing from the relationship Making Love Last Is Difficult Attributional style and accomodation: Happy couples attribute good outcomes to one another and bad outcomes to situations, whereas distressed couples do the opposite Validating couples are happiest Each partner considers the other partner’s opinions and emotions valid, even if they disagree Making Love Last Is Difficult Gottman believes that as long as there are about five positive interactions for every negative one in a marriage, chances are good that the marriage will be stable Strategies for maintaining a positive relationship include: show interest in your partner, be affectionate, show you care, spend quality time together, maintain loyalty and fidelity, handle conflict