* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Impact of extreme weather on critical infrastructure Deliverable D2.1
Atmospheric model wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Michael E. Mann wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Saskatchewan wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
This project is co-funded by the European Union under the 7th Framework Programme Impact of extreme weather on critical infrastructure Deliverable D2.1 Definition of different EWIs, to support the management of European CI D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 2 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI Project Information Grant agreement number 606799 Project acronym INTACT Project full title Impact of extreme weather on critical infrastructure Capability Project Start date of project 1 May 2014 Duration 36 months Partners TNO, CMCC, DELTARES, FAC, DRAGADOS, HRW, PANTEIA, NGI, CSIC, UNU-EHS, ULSTER, VTT Document information Work package WP2: Climate and Extreme Weather Deliverable Title Deliverable D2.1: Definition of different EWIs, to support the management of European CI Version 1.0 Date of submission 30 April 2015 Main Editor(s) Edoardo Bucchignani and Jose Manuel Gutierrez Contributor(s) Myriam Montesarchio, Alessandra Lucia Zollo, Guido Rianna, Maialen Iturbide, Sixto Herrera, Paola Mercogliano Reviewer(s) Unni Eidsvig (NGI), Peter Petiet (TNO) This document should be referenced as E. Bucchignani and J.M. Gutierrez (2015), “Definition of different EWIs, to support the management of European CI”, INTACT Deliverable D2.1, project co-funded by the European Commission under the 7th Frame-work Programme, Classification – This report is: Draft Final X Confidential Restricted Public X History Version Issue Date Status Distribution 0.1 10 April 2015 Draft Consortium 1.0 30 April 2015 Final Project Officer Security Sensitivity Assessment According classification? YES If NO, please explain Member of Security Scrutiny Board Peter Petiet 3 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Tables and figures ................................................................................................................................... 6 Glossary .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 9 1 2 3 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 10 1.1 The INTACT project ................................................................................................................ 10 1.2 Aim of the document ............................................................................................................. 11 1.3 Reading guide........................................................................................................................ 11 1.4 Description of methodology .................................................................................................. 12 Definitions and understanding ...................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Definition of extreme weather events ................................................................................... 13 2.2 Climate changes and Extreme events..................................................................................... 14 2.3 Impact of extreme events on infrastructures ......................................................................... 15 2.4 Changing climate and infrastructure vulnerability .................................................................. 17 Diagnosis and detection of extreme events ................................................................................... 19 3.1 Modelling of Extreme events ................................................................................................. 19 3.2 Extreme Weather Indicators (EWI) ........................................................................................ 20 3.3 Statistical modelling - Generalized Extreme Values (GEV) ...................................................... 22 3.4 Statistical modelling – Trend Analysis .................................................................................... 23 Description of conventional observational datasets adopted in the activity ................................... 24 4.1 ECA&D blended dataset......................................................................................................... 25 4.2 E-OBS .................................................................................................................................... 25 4.3 EURO4M-APGD ..................................................................................................................... 26 4.4 Spain02 ................................................................................................................................. 27 4.5 WATCH-Forcing-Data-ERA-Interim (WFDEI) ........................................................................... 28 5 Examples of application................................................................................................................. 30 6 Conclusions and future work ......................................................................................................... 36 4 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 7 References .................................................................................................................................... 37 5 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI Tables and figures Table 3.1 Indicators based on temperature and precipitation ........................................................................................ 21 Table 3.2 Indicators based on wind, snow and humidity................................................................................................... 22 Table 4.1 Overview of observational datasets ........................................................................................................................ 24 Table 4.2 List of the WFDEI variables considered in the INTACT project .................................................................... 29 Figure 1.1 WP2 Functional architecture .................................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 2.1 Representation of Probability Density Function of temperature: effect of increase in (a) mean, (b) variance and (c) both. ................................................................................................................................................................ 15 Figure 5.1 Examples of EWI for precipitation, wind and temperature, significant trends, evaluated averaging over the entire Europe, for the time period 1980-2010, for the ECA&D data set. ............................. 30 Figure 5.2 Map of the trend over Europe at a local scale for some temperature EWI reported in Table 3.1 over the period 1981-2010 using the ECA&D dataset. ......................................................................................................31 Figure 5.3 Map of the trend over Europe at a local scale for some temperature EWI reported in Table 3.1 over the period 1981-2010 using the ECA&D dataset. ......................................................................................................31 Figure 5.4 Map of the trend over Europe at a local scale for some precipitation EWI reported in Table 3.1 over the period 1981-2010 using the ECA&D dataset. ......................................................................................................32 Figure 5.5 Maps of 50-years return value of precipitation, snow depth, wind speed and temperatures of the ECA&D dataset for the period 1981-2010. ...................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 5.6 100-years return value of precipitation, snow depth, wind speed and temperatures of the ECA&D dataset for the period 1981-2010. .............................................................................................................................. 33 Figure 5.7 Map of the trend over Europe at a local scale for some precipitation EWI reported in Table 3.1 over the period 1981-2010 using the WFDEI dataset. ........................................................................................................ 35 Figure 5.8 Map of the trend over Europe at a local scale for some precipitation EWI reported in the Table 3.1 over the period 1981-2010 using the WFDEI dataset. ................................................................................... 35 6 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI Glossary CI Critical Infrastructure CCI WMO’s Commission for Climatology CEH Centre for Ecology and Hydrology CORDEX Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment CLIVAR Climate Variability and Predictability EC European Commission ECA&D European Climate Assessment & Dataset EU European Union ESSEM Earth System Science and Environmental Management ETCCDI Experts of CCl/CLIVAR/JCOMM Team on Climate Change Detection and Indices EUPORIAS European Provision Of Regional Impacts Assessments on Seasonal and Decadal Timescales (EU FP7) EW Extreme Weather EWE Extreme Weather Event EWI Extreme Weather Indicator GCM General Circulation Model GEV Generalized Extreme Values FP6 Sixth Framework Programme FP7 Seventh Framework Programme JCOMM Joint WMO-IOC Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change PDF Probability Density Function POT Peaks-over-threshold RCM Regional Climate Model VALUE Validating and Integrating Downscaling Methods for Climate Change Research (ESSEM COST action) WATCH Water and Global Change (EU FP6) 7 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI WCRP World Climate Research Program WFDEI WATCH-Forcing-Data-ERA-Interim WMO World Meteorological Organization WP Work Package 8 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI Executive summary The EU FP7 project INTACT aims to support governments and managers of critical infrastructure to reduce the risks caused by extreme weather by providing information, methods, tools and examples of good practices. The identification of the Extreme Weather Indicators (EWIs) represents the first goal of the Work Package (WP) 2. They will be analyzed over Europe with a special focus on the critical infrastructures (CI) identified in the frame of WP5. It is very important to emphasize that EWIs represent a concise way to characterize the expected changes, in frequency and intensity, of weather induced hazards. Climate changes are the only drivers of the change considered in WP2. As reported in different literature works, some kinds of extreme weather events might become more frequent and severe across the globe under the effect of global warming. The evaluation of hazard changes in the next decades is the first step to provide indications about the future risk posed by EWE and related hazard to CI. More specifically, hazards considered by WP2 are mainly related to precipitation (incl., snowfall) winds and temperature. This deliverable describes the activity aimed to define appropriate EWIs for the characterization of extreme events according to definitions and thresholds critical for infrastructures. Definitions and guidance on climate change indicators adapted to user needs are provided, in order to meet scientific standards with a focus on extreme events in a European climate change context. The characterization of these extremes is performed using datasets provided from different sources or case studies. Existing indices (e.g. ETCCDI, http://cccma.seos.uvic.ca/ETCCDI) are reviewed, while new specific EWIs, tailored to users’ needs, are developed. Thus, beyond the typical extreme indices defined from temperature and precipitation, multi-parameter indices are introduced, focusing on other parameters, such as wind speed or humidity. This extension will allow to synthesize the combination effects of meteorological variables into EWIs in order to better support the management of CI in Europe. The specific study objectives will be defined according to the quality of the available data. To this aim observed data (specific from case studies, or generic like the interpolated grids Iberia02, E-OBS, MAP, etc.) and databases will be considered. 9 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 1 Introduction 1.1 The INTACT project Resilience of Critical Infrastructure (CI) to Extreme Weather Events (EWE), such as heavy rainfall, drought or icing, is one of the most demanding challenges for both government and society. Extreme Weather (EW) is a phenomenon that causes severe threats to the well-functioning of CI. The effects of various levels of EW on CI will vary throughout Europe. These effects are witnessed through changes in seasons and extreme temperatures (high and low), humidity (high and low), extreme or prolonged precipitation (for example rain, fog, snow, and ice) or prolonged lack thereof (drought), extreme wind or lack of wind, and thunderstorms. The increased frequency and intensity of EWE can cause events such as flooding, drought, ice formation and wild fires which present a range of complex challenges to the operational resilience of CI. The economic and societal relevance of the dependability and resilience of CI is obvious: infrastructure malfunctioning and outages can have far reaching consequences and impacts on economy and society. The cost of developing and maintaining CI is high if they are expected to have a realistic functional and economic life (50+ years). Hence, future EWE has to be taken into account when considering protection measures, mitigation measures and adaption measures to reflect actual and predicted instances of CI failures. The INTACT project will address these challenges and bring together innovative and cutting edge knowledge and experience in Europe in order to develop and demonstrate best practices in engineering, materials, construction, planning and designing protective measures as well as crisis response and recovery capabilities. All this will culminate in the INTACT Reference Guide, the decision support system that facilitates cross-disciplinary and cross-border data sharing and provides for a forum for evidence based policy formulation. The objectives of the INTACT project are to: • • Assess regionally differentiated risk throughout Europe associated with extreme weather; Identify and classify, on a Europe wide basis, CI and to assess the resilience of such CI to the impact of EWE; • Raise awareness of decision-makers and CI operators about the challenges (current and future) EW conditions may pose to their CI; and, • Indicate a set of potential measures and technologies to consider and implement, be it for planning, designing and protecting CI or for effectively preparing for crisis response and recovery. 10 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 1.2 Aim of the document In this section, the general objectives of WP2, and specifically of this deliverable, are defined. WP2 aims to define appropriate EW Indicators (EWIs) characterizing the relevant critical factors for the different infrastructures, presenting both recent trends and projections of EWIs over the 21st century. Historical trends are presented considering observational datasets. Then performances of climate model simulations in reproducing the different EWI are estimated and finally, future projections of the different EWIs under different climate change scenarios are provided. Figure 1.1shows the functional architecture of WP2. Figure 1.1 WP2 Functional architecture This deliverable aims: • • • • to provide a general overview about the impact of extreme events on infrastructures, considering a changing climate; to define appropriate EWIs characterizing the relevant critical factors for different infrastructures; to provide a description of all the observational datasets used; to provide some examples of applications that will be developed in the frame of WP2. 1.3 Reading guide This document is organized as follows. Chapter 2 provides some basic definitions (such as the definition of Extreme Weather Events), an overview of the impacts of Extreme Events on Infrastructures, the problems connected with the design of infrastructures under a changing climate and the related vulnerability. Indeed, a typical procedure to design infrastructures is to take into account extreme values from the past historical information on climate extremes and to assume stationary mean states, but 11 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI such measures could not be able to guarantee safety conditions in the future. Chapter 3 provides a description of Extreme Weather Indicators which refer to moderate extremes (typically occurring several times every year) and of Statistical Modelling, used to evaluate intensity and frequency of rare events (that lie far in the tails of the probability distribution of variables, for example events that occur once in 20 years). Chapter 4 provides a list and a general description of the observational datasets used in the present work, with large emphasis on the resolution and on the data potentiality. In Chapter 5, some examples of applications are shown and analysed, while the main Conclusions are reported in Chapter 6. 1.4 Description of methodology The main aim of WP2 of INTACT project is the definition of appropriate EW Indicators (EWI) characterizing the relevant critical factors for different infrastructures, analysing present trends and future climate projections for the 21st century. One of the aims of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) is to provide a regular monitoring of the occurrence of extreme weather and climate events. In particular, the WMO’s Commission for Climatology (CCl), the World Climate Research Program (WCRP) with Climate Variability and Predictability (CLIVAR), and the Joint WMO-IOC Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology (JCOMM) have developed tools for the analysis of computed statistics (indices). Moreover, the Experts of CCl/CLIVAR/JCOMM Team on Climate Change Detection and Indices (ETCCDI) has provided a core set of 27 extreme indices for temperature and precipitation, to assess changes in extreme climate events. In order to achieve the WP2 main aim, existing indices from ETCCDI are reviewed, while new EWI’s, tailored to the user’s needs, are developed. In particular, in the frame of task 2.1, multiparameter indices are defined, focusing not only on temperature and precipitation, but also on other variables, as wind and humidity. In this way, it is possible to synthesize the combined effects of meteorological variables into EWIs in order to better support the management of CI in Europe. More specifically, indicators presented in Chapter 3 will be evaluated using the observational datasets described in Chapter 4. 12 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 2 Definitions and understanding 2.1 Definition of extreme weather events Climate extremes and temporal deviations of weather characteristics from the norm have an important role and strong impact on the natural environment and economic activities (Klein Tank et al, 2009). For example, it is well known that too much or too little precipitation (e.g. flood or drought) poses severe challenges to the society. So it is very important to detect how extremes have changed in the past, if a change of them is expected in the future and what this change could be (e.g. changes in the intensity and/or frequency). In this view, it is important to develop a procedure to characterize and quantify extreme events; however, there is not a universally accepted methodology for this purpose. There is not a unique definition of “extreme”, since it can describe either a characteristic of a climate variable or that of an impact (Stephenson, 2008). In the case of a variable related with weather or climate (e.g. temperature or precipitation), an extreme can be defined as a value located in the tails of the variable’s distribution, occurring infrequently. A useful criterion is also the evaluation of the ratio of the intensity of an anomaly in relation to climatic variability: it is generally agreed that extreme events are those exceeding two standard deviations in long term observational series (Kislov and Krenke, 2009). In the case of an impact, it is more difficult to define the extreme, since generally there is not a unique way to quantify it. Moreover, a rare climate event does not necessarily causes damages; for example, a strong wind over the Ocean generally does not result in any damage while, on the other side, floods might be caused by not very unusual precipitation, especially in heavily urbanized basins (Peterson et al. 2012). Weather conditions which are unfavourable but normal for a particular area (e.g. Siberian frosts or long periods without precipitation in the desert) cannot be regarded as EWE (Kislov and Krenke, 2009). The IPCC Assessment Report 4 (IPCC, 2007) defines an extreme climatic event as one that is rare within its statistical reference distribution at a particular place and time. Definitions of “rare” vary, but an extreme weather event would normally be as rare as or rarer than the 10th or 90th percentile of the observed Probability Density Function (PDF). By definition, the characteristics of what is called extreme weather may vary from place to place. Single extreme events cannot be simply and directly attributed to anthropogenic climate change, as there is always a finite chance that the event in question might have occurred naturally. When a pattern of extreme weather persists for some time, such as a season, it may be classed as an extreme climate event, especially if it yields an average or total that is itself extreme (e.g. drought or heavy rainfall over a season). The IPCC Special Report on managing the risks of extreme events defines an extreme as the occurrence of a value of a variable above or below a threshold value near the upper (or lower) ends of the range of observed values of the variable (IPCC, 2012). Extreme events are defined not only with respect to their low frequency, but also with respect to the intensity. For events characterized by relatively small or large values (i.e. events that have large 13 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI magnitude deviations from the norm), one need to take into account that not all intense events are rare. For example, low cumulative precipitations are often far from the mean precipitation but can still occur quite frequently. Also severity is a criterion used in climate science to classify events as extreme: events that result in large socio-economic losses. Severity is a complex criterion because damaging impacts can occur in the absence of a rare or intense climatic event, for example thawing of mountain permafrost leading to rock falls and mud-slides. 2.2 Climate changes and Extreme events Design of infrastructures is generally performed under the hypothesis that climate is stationary, meaning that physical variables could vary from day to day, but always around an unchanging mean state. Information about weather extreme values on a specific area are generally taken from historical series: in particular, values corresponding to a fixed return value of a variable in the historical dataset are generally considered the normative value for design. However, this approach could be no more adequate, since it is evident that climate changes are unequivocal and will alter the mean, variability and extremes. The warming of the climate system in recent decades is evident from observations and is mainly related to the increase of anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations (IPCC, 2012). As a consequence, also precipitation will be altered, since a warmer atmosphere will hold more water vapour, resulting in heavier rains or, on the other side, in strong drought due to larger water absorption from soil and vegetation. A changing climate may lead to changes in the frequency, intensity, spatial extent, duration and timing of weather and climate extremes. Climate changes are usually assessed in terms of averages climate properties rather than on variability or extremes, but often these last ones have more impacts on the society than averages values (Katz and Brown, 1992). As climate extreme will change, it is likely that risks for infrastructure failure will increase worldwide, since extreme weather conditions become more variable and regionally more intense. Figure 2.1 (a, b, c) explains how extreme events can be defined as the tails of a PDF; in particular, the PDF of daily temperature tends to be approximately a Gaussian. More specifically, Figure 2.1(a, b, c) shows respectively how hot and cold extremes are affected by changes in the mean, variance and in both. Temperature and precipitation extremes have been studied on global, regional and national scales (Alexander et al, 2006). On the global scale, the most comprehensive analyses on temperature and precipitation extremes are discussed in the Fourth Assessment Report of IPCC (IPCC, 2007). Some recent changes in the pattern of extremes have been significant. Over Europe, observed trends to longer heat waves and fewer extremely cold days have been registered. For example, since 1960, the mean heat wave intensity over the Eastern Mediterranean area increased by a factor of five (How et al, 2013), suggesting that the heat wave characteristics in this region have increased at higher rates than previously reported (Kuglitsch et al, 2010). Furthermore, flood damage has increased substantially. 14 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI However observations alone do not provide conclusive and general proof to how climate change affects flood frequency. Figure 2.1 Representation of Probability Density Function of temperature: effect of increase in (a) mean, (b) variance and (c) both. Source: http://www.garnautreview.org.au 2.3 Impact of extreme events on infrastructures Infrastructures include transportation systems (bridges, roads, and motorways), urban buildings, energy, water and communication systems, health-care systems and in general those sections intended to deliver services to support the human quality of life (Wilbanks and Fernandez, 2012). Critical Infrastructures (CI) provide fundamental functions to sustain the society (such as transnational connecting networks) and a breakdown of a CI could lead to significant economic losses and high number of human deaths. Moreover, a CI may rely on resources provided by other infrastructures. For these reasons, the protection of CI from disasters is an important priority task for all countries. It is of great importance for regional and local institutions to be aware of present and future climate extremes related risks with regard to the development of adaptation strategies (Hokstad et al, 2012). Climate-related extremes generally produce large impact on infrastructures, especially on those with insufficient design. Infrastructures may become inadequate under the effects of severe extremes: for example, the capacity of sewerages may be affected by intense rainfalls, as well as industrial installations containing dangerous materials. Many villages in the world are dependent on wide 15 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI infrastructure networks for power, water, transport and telecommunications, which are exposed to a wide range of extreme events, especially because modern logistic systems are intended to minimize redundancies (IPCC, 2012). Transport infrastructure is vulnerable to extreme value of temperature, precipitation and wind, which can have impact on roads, rail, and airports; impacts on ports can have serious implications on international trade, since more than 80% of international trade in goods is carried by sea (UNCTAD, 2009). Coastal inundation may affect terminals, storage areas and intermodal facilities especially on small islands, where transportation facilities are generally located in low elevation coastal zones. The design of many infrastructures, for example those related to transportation, water and energy, require the availability of climatic data related to extreme events: for example, high precipitation might affect the resilience of roads and bridges. The main aim, in fact, is to avoid damages to structures due to extreme events during the whole lifetime of the infrastructures, and in the same time to limit the costs for the realization of them. For the design of infrastructures, engineers account for climate extremes that occur only infrequently and are not expected to recur each year. For example, design rainfalls for sewage systems are derived estimating long period return values of maximum amount of rainfall within 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours (Zhang and Zwiers, 2013), making use of powerful statistical tools based on extreme value theory, to aid the analysis of historical series (Coles, 2001): such tools have been developed to infer extreme values that might occur beyond the range of the observed sample, such as the estimation of the 100-years return value on the basis of a 50 year series of historical values. Impact of extreme events is being investigated in the frame of EUPORIAS (EUPORIAS, 2014) and VALUE (VALUE, 2013) projects. EUPORIAS (European Provision Of Regional Impacts Assessments on Seasonal and Decadal Timescales) has been funded by the European commission under the 7th framework program, with the aim of developing and delivering reliable predictions of the impacts of future climatic conditions on a number of key sectors (water, energy, health, transport, agriculture and tourism), on timescales from seasons to years. VALUE (Validating and Integrating Downscaling Methods for Climate Change Research) is a COST Action whose aim is to provide a European network to validate and develop downscaling methods and improve the collaboration between the research communities and with stakeholders. The Action systematically compares the different downscaling approaches and assesses temporal variability from sub-daily to decadal time scales including climate change, extreme events, spatial coherence and variability, and inter-variable consistency together with the related uncertainties. In particular, a WP is devoted to carry out an inventory of extreme definition, a validation phase and development of downscaling methods for spatially extended extremes. The characterization of EW is performed according with thresholds critical for infrastructures. Absolute thresholds are suitable in order to monitor extreme events that affect human society and the natural environment, while percentile thresholds are specific of the sites, since they are expressions of anomalies relative to the local climate. Moreover, specific threshold values related to stakeholder’s and user’s needs are considered. 16 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 2.4 Changing climate and infrastructure vulnerability The severity of climate impacts on infrastructures will vary across Europe according to specific locations and their geophysical risk exposure, the existing adaptive capacity and resilience, and the level of economic development. Evaluation of potential effects of climate change on infrastructure is still very limited and further research and development will be required to support decision-making. Experiences over the past periods have shown how vulnerable infrastructures can be to the types of EWE that are projected to be more intense and more frequent with future climate change. Evaluation of vulnerability of infrastructures requires the analysis of several climatic elements and their impact on the resilience. The world’s largest reinsurance company, Munich Re, calculated that more than 90 percent of all disasters and 65 percent of associated economic damages were weather and climate related (Munich Re, 2011). Insurance generally report an increase in the number of weather-related events, which have caused significant losses, for example, wind-storms and floods in Europe. However, there is still insufficient information about the extent to which these changes can be found in wind and precipitation observations and whether they are driven by global warming. Some of the hazard-driven increases of events may have been hidden by human prevention actions, in particular in the case of flood, as these can be influenced much more by preventive measures than wind-storm losses. Analysis of vulnerability can be done from a global or local view, for example by assessing the vulnerability of a city, a river basin or a specific piece of infrastructure. Vulnerabilities and impacts are issues beyond physical infrastructures themselves: the true consequences of impacts involve not only the costs associated with the replacement of affected infrastructures but also social and environmental effects, since supply chains are interrupted, economic activities are suspended, social well-being is threatened (Wilbanks and Fernandez, 2012). Vulnerability alarms tend to be focused on EWE associated with climate change that can interfere with infrastructure services, often cascading across different infrastructures due to wide interdependencies, especially where populations and activities are concentrated in urban areas. Vulnerabilities are larger when infrastructures are subject to multiple stresses, when they are located in areas vulnerable to EWE and if climate change is severe. These risks are greater for infrastructures that are located near particularly climate-sensitive environmental features, such as coastlines, rivers, storm tracks and vegetation in arid areas. A larger risk is expected for infrastructures already stressed by age or by demand levels that exceed what they were designed to supply (Wilbanks and Fernandez, 2012). The consequences of climate change will be different, depending on the kinds of infrastructures: • The consequences for transport infrastructure such as rail, roads, shipping and aviation will differ from region to region. In particular, the projected increase in the frequency and intensity of EWE such as heavy rain, snowfall, extreme heat and cold, drought and reduced visibility can increase negative impacts on transport infrastructures, causing damages and economic losses, transport disruptions and delays (European Commission, 2013). 17 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI • • Climate changes will have effects on energy transmission, distribution, generation and demand. In fact, the generation of electrical energy is affected by efficiency reduction due to climate change (e.g. decreasing availability of cooling water for electricity generators). However, in some parts of Europe, increased precipitation or more wind may also lead to better opportunities for hydropower or wind energy generation. Furthermore, extreme weather periods, such as heat waves or cold spells, will cause higher energy demand peaks, causing overstress of energy infrastructure (European Commission, 2013). Buildings and infrastructures can be vulnerable because of their design (e.g. low resistance to storms) or location (e.g. in flood-prone areas, landslides, avalanches). Many European cities have been built along a river, and these rivers will respond to extreme rainfall or snowmelt events with extreme discharges, threatening the cities with floods (European Commission, 2013). Implications of climate change for infrastructures can be examined by assessing historical data with extreme weather events and by simulating future conditions, including both individual events and either a series of extreme events in a short time period or the combination of an extreme weather event with another type of threat at the same time (Wilbanks and Kates, 2010). As explained in Sec. 3.1, Regional Climate Models are used to provide high resolution climate projections on the area of interest over the 21st century, with different emission scenarios. According with WMO average values recommendations (http://www.wmo.int/pages/themes/climate/climate_data_and_products.php), over 30-years periods are used, as they are long enough to filter out any interannual variation or anomalies, but also short enough to be able to show longer climatic trends. Generally the current climate period is calculated over 1961-1990 (or 1971-2000) time period, while the following time horizons are selected for future projections: 1) 2011-2040 (short range) 2) 2041-2070 (medium range) 3) 2071-2100 (long range) These time periods are selected to provide insight into changes in climatic parameters over this century and to be representative of future time frames for planning infrastructure design or rehabilitation cycles. Future vulnerability assessments are related to time frames that match the design or remaining service life of existing infrastructures of the service life for new infrastructure. Generally, data necessary for the vulnerability assessments are available and scenarios of climate change are possible for almost all climate indicators. However, the quality or usefulness of the data (both observed and predicted) varies greatly, as well as their level of confidence. Indeed, the data from the models must be validated by the scientific community. As research continues and additional validation work is done, more products become available, although this depends largely on the needs expressed by end-users and the importance given to produce this information. One of the main problems linked to data availability arises from a lack of observed data, namely for events that are very localized in time and space which, by nature, are rare. 18 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 3 Diagnosis and detection of extreme events 3.1 Modelling of Extreme events Assessment of trends and changes in weather extremes is complicated and harder to predict because they are rare events, related to sharp changes in climatic system and result from its nonlinear nature (Kislov and Krenke, 2009). The main tool for providing insights into possible future climate changes is the climate modelling. Climate models are mathematical models that simulate the climate system’s behaviour based on the fundamental laws of physics. General Circulation Models (GCMs) simulate planet-wide climate dynamics: they are powerful instruments to simulate the response of the global climate system to external forcing (Giorgi, 2005), however they are generally unsuitable to simulate local climate, since they are characterized by resolutions generally around or coarser than 100 km, which is too poor for impact studies, since many important phenomena occur at spatial scales of few tens of km. Moreover, GCMs do not account for vegetation variations, complex topography and coastlines, which are important aspects of the physical response governing the regional climate change signal. One of the most effective tools, providing high resolution climate analysis through dynamical downscaling, is represented by Regional Climate Models (RCM) (Giorgi and Mearns, 1991), able to provide an accurate description of climate variability on local scale. Moreover, RCMs show the capability to provide a detailed description of climate extremes (Rummukainen, 2010; Soares et al, 2012). A very relevant research question would be the determination of changes of extreme events expected under anthropogenic climate change in future climate model simulations. The capabilities of RCMs were assessed over Europe in the framework of several European projects, such as PRUDENCE (Christensen and Christensen, 2007) and ENSEMBLES (Van Der Linden and Mitchell, 2009). In recent years, the WCRP Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) project (Giorgi et al, 2009) has been established to provide a global coordination of regional climate downscaling for improved climate change adaptation policy and impact assessment: EURO-CORDEX is the European branch of the CORDEX initiative. To date there is a lack of an exhaustive validation of EURO-CORDEX data in terms of extreme values. Preliminary analysis of climate projections collected in EURO-CORDEX project show that in the future a significant increase in the frequency of events, such as heavy rainfall, heat waves and droughts, is expected (Jacob et al, 2014; Vautard et al, 2013). Confidence in projections of future changes in the severity and frequency of such events will increase if the mechanisms of changes can be identified and understood. Equally important is the rigorous quantification of the uncertainties in these projections, including the natural variability of the climate system, the limitations in climate models and the statistical methods used to analyse their output (Wehner, 2013). Several works highlight evidences that RCM skill in simulating the spatial and temporal characteristics of rainfall increases with increasing model resolution (Maraun et al., 2010); moreover, a higher grid spacing 19 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI is expected to improve parameters such as meso-scale circulations and precipitation intensity distribution at daily scale (Kotlarski et al, 2014). The main inconvenience of regional climate models is that they are computationally demanding, this feature gives some constraints on the resolution, domain size, number of experiments and duration of simulations that can be conducted. Overall, a general agreement in the research community is emerged about the likely future pattern of extreme weather events in Europe: heat waves will become more frequent while the number of cold spells and frost days are likely to decrease. Southern Europe and the Mediterranean Region will be affected by a combination of a reduction in annual precipitation and an increase in average temperatures (Giorgi and Lionello, 2008). High intensity and extreme precipitation are expected to become more frequent over the 21st century. The increased frequency is estimated to be larger for more extreme events, but will vary from region to region (Beninston et al, 2007). Numerical tools are being used in the evaluation of extreme events simulated in regional climate models, in the characterization of the influence of large scale atmospheric circulation variations on extreme precipitation and in the detection of anthropogenic influence on temperature extremes (Zwiers et al, 2011) 3.2 Extreme Weather Indicators (EWI) The ETCCDI core set of 27 extreme indices for temperature and precipitation (http://etccdi.pacificclimate.org/index.shtml ) has been extended to other variables (wind, snow, humidity, etc.) within the ECA&D project (http://eca.knmi.nl/indicesextremes/index.php). These indices highlight various characteristics of extremes, including frequency, amplitude and persistence (Klein Tank et al, 2009) and are widely used to assess future changes (e.g. Fischer et al. 2013). Some indices involve calculation of the number of days in a year/season exceeding specific thresholds. On the one hand, percentile thresholds are specific of the sites, since they are expressions of anomalies relative to the local climate. For example, the number of days with daily minimum temperature below the 10th percentile value in the 1961-1990 base period depends on the season (e.g. a minimum temperature of 10°C could be considered not an extreme in winter, but would be very extreme in other seasons) and is also related to the geographical location. On the other hand, absolute thresholds are suitable in order to monitor extreme events that affect human society and the natural environment. Examples of such indices are the following: maximum 24 hours precipitation amount, widely used in engineering applications to infer design values for engineered structures, or the number of frost days per year (i.e. minimum temperature below 0°C). Such indices may not be applicable everywhere on the Earth, since the phenomena may not occur in some places (e.g. a frost day would never occur in the tropics), however they have a long history in many applications. To build the final EWI dictionary to be used in the framework of the INTACT project, we have considered several sources. Although, most of the indices are included in the extended list defined within the ECA&D project, we have also considered some indicators used by the Weather Meteorological Services 20 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI to establish weather alerts and warnings, and other combined indicators. The definition and details of the indices considered are included in Table 3.1and Table 3.2: Table 3.1 Indicators based on temperature and precipitation Temperature FD SU ID TR GSL TXx TNx TXn TNn TN10p TX10p TN90p TX90p WSDI CSDI DTR FTD HW Precipitation Rx1day Rx5day SDII RR1 R10mm R20mm RNNmm CDD CWD R95pTOT R99pTOT PRCPTOT RAI RDI Combined DW DC WW WC FRD Description Number of frost (TN<0ºC) days Number of summer (TX>25ºC) days Number of icing (TX<0ºC) days Number of tropical (TN>20ºC) nights Growing season length Maximum value of daily maximum temperature Maximum value of daily minimum temperature Minimum value of daily maximum temperature Minimum value of daily minimum temperature Number of days when TN < 10th percentile Number of days when TX < 10th percentile Number of days when TN > 90th percentile Number of days when TX > 90th percentile Warm-spell duration index Cold-spell duration index Daily temperature range Number of days with temperature zero-crossings (Frost-thaw cycles) Number of heat waves (TX>35ºC) days Description Maximum 1-day precipitation Maximum consecutive 5-day precipitation Simple precipitation intensity index Annual count of days when PRCP≥ 1mm Annual count of days when PRCP≥ 10mm Annual count of days when PRCP≥ 20mm Annual count of days when PRCP≥ NNmm Maximum length of dry spell (consecutive days with RR < 1mm) Maximum length of wet spell (consecutive days with RR ≥ 1mm) Annual total PRCP when RR > 95p Annual total PRCP when RR > 99p Annual total precipitation in wet days Number of days when TN > 90th percentile Number of days when TX > 90th percentile Description Number of dry (RR<0.1 mm)-warm (TG>75th percentile) days Number of dry (RR<0.1 mm)-cold (TG<25th percentile) days Number of wet (RR<0.1 mm)-warm (TG>75th percentile) days Number of wet (RR<0.1 mm)-cold (TG<25th percentile) days Number of freezing rain (TX<0ºC y RR>0.5 mm) Units Days Days Days Days Days ºC ºC ºC ºC days days days days days days ºC days days Units mm mm mm days days days days days days mm mm mm 1 mm Units days days days days days 21 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI These indicators allow the analysis of the interannual variability and trend of the mean and extreme weather regimes, both in the historical period and the future projections given by the models. Note that the models have important bias, most of them non-systematic, and, then, the effect of these biases should be taken into account in the calculation of the indices, mainly in the case of absolute thresholddependent indicators. In this sense, percentile threshold are more robust than the absolute ones. Table 3.2 Indicators based on wind, snow and humidity. Wind FG FGx1day FGXx1day FG05 FG10 FG15 FG25 FGNN Snow SD1 SD010 SD1020 SDx1day SDratio Combined HU90 Description Monthly average of daily mean wind speed Yearly maximum of daily mean wind speed Yearly maximum of daily maximum wind speed of gusts Number of days with wind speed > 5 m/s Number of days with wind speed > 10 m/s Number of days with wind speed > 15 m/s Number of days with wind speed > 25 m/s Number of days with wind speed > NN m/s Description Number of days with snow cover Number of days with snow depth 0-10 cm Number of days with snow depth 10-20 cm Yearly maximum snowfall Average total annual / seasonal snowfall Description Number of days when the relative humidity (daily mean) is above 90% and mean temperature > 10 ºC Units m/s m/s m/s days days Days Days Days Units Days Days Days Mm 1 Units Days 3.3 Statistical modelling - Generalized Extreme Values (GEV) The descriptive indices developed by ETCCDI refer to moderate extremes that typically occur several times every year. On the other side, but complementary, intensity and frequency of rare events, in terms of return periods and values, are evaluated using the extreme value theory. This approach allows estimating the intensity of events which occur once in a given period, typically 50, 100 or 1000 years. To this aim, two general approaches are possible: • • Peaks-over- threshold method (POT), which adjusts the occurrence and intensity of events above a predefined threshold. Explicit extreme value theory based on Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), which is, by the extreme value theorem, the limit distribution of properly normalized maxima of a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables. Once fitted, the model provides a cumulative distribution function, F(x), which can be used to estimate return values for different time spans (T), usually expressed in years, which are typically used to design, maintain and adapt the infrastructures. Changes in these return values lead to changes in the intensity 22 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI of extreme events. For example, where extremes increase, the impact will be a reduction in the “effective” return period event that existing structures were built to withstand. In this case, return periods and values are estimated for a climatological period, typically 30 years, and, then, the possible changes found are referred to this time-scale. To this aim, for each location and variable the parameters of the GEV distribution (location, scale and shape) were estimated using the method of maximum log-likelihood and, then, the return values for 50 and 100 years were obtained. Equivalent analyses using the POT approach leads to similar results and, then, for the sake of the simplicity, has not been included in the present document. 3.4 Statistical modelling – Trend Analysis In order to analysis the historical evolution of the EWI described in Table 3.1and Table 3.2, linear regression models (least squared method) were fitted against time to obtain the values of linear trend and to calculate the change between the end and beginning of the studied period. Furthermore, the Mann-Kendall non-parametric test was used for detecting the statistical significance of trend (Kendall, 1975). A significance P-level <0.05 (95% of confidence) was set to reject the null hypothesis of the test, that is, no trend in data. This confidence threshold was used in all the figures shown in the present document. 23 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 4 Description of conventional observational datasets adopted in the activity The characterization of extreme weather events is performed using datasets provided from different sources or case studies. This specific study objective will be defined according to the quality of the available data. This Chapter provides a list and a general description of the observational datasets used in the present work, with large emphasis on the resolution and on the data potentiality. Using these observational datasets we can evaluate the indicators presented in Chapter 3. Each dataset mentioned in Table 4.1 will be described in the next sections. Table 4.1 Overview of observational datasets Dataset Spatial characteristic Spatial Extent Resolution Temporal characteristics Period Resolution Parameters Maximum, minimum and mean temperature, precipitation amount, mean sea level pressure, cloud cover, humidity, snow depth, sunshine duration, mean wind speed, maximum wind gust, wind direction. Maximum, minimum and mean temperature, precipitation and mean sea level pressure ECA&D Europe and Mediterranean Point stations different periods for different stations Daily E-OBS Europe and Mediterranean 0.25º (~25 km) 1950-2013 Daily 5x5 km 1971-2008 Daily Precipitation (rainfall plus snow water equivalent) 0.11º, 0.22º and 0.44º 1971-2007 Daily Maximum, minimum and mean temperature, precipitation 3-hourly, 6hourly and daily Temperature, wind speed, surface pressure, specific humidity, long- and short-wave downwards surface radiation, rainfall and snowfall rate. EURO4MAPGD Spain02 WFDEI 24 European Alps and adjacent flatland Peninsular Spain and the Balearic islands Worldwide – Land areas 0.5ºx0.5º 1979-2012 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 4.1 ECA&D blended dataset The European Climate Assessment & Dataset (ECA&D, http://eca.knmi.nl/) project was initiated by the ECSN (http://www.eumetnet.eu/ecsn) in 1998 to provide of high quality climate data, products and services to the European user community. This project is receiving actually data from 66 participants for 62 countries, containing 40630 series of observations for 12 elements at 10259 meteorological stations throughout Europe and the Mediterranean, most of them publicly available for non-commercial research and education (http://eca.knmi.nl/documents/ECAD_datapolicy.pdf). Although both blended and non-blended ECA series are available (Klein Tank et al, 2002), only blended series are further analysed in ECA&D and used for gridding and, then, this is the data set considered within the INTACT project. Blended series are series that are near-complete by infilling from nearby stations and using synoptical messages (more details in http://eca.knmi.nl/documents/atbd.pdf). Meteorological observations are taken at many stations across Europe, each day. To minimize the effects of changes over time in the way the measurements were made, rigorous quality control is applied before the data is used to analyse extremes. The blended series have been tested for homogeneity, which is relevant to assess the quality of each series for climate change research. The meteorological parameters included in this data set are daily values of maximum, minimum and mean temperature, precipitation amount, mean sea level pressure, cloud cover, humidity, snow depth, sunshine duration, wind speed and direction, and maximum wind gust. Note that the observational network and spatial coverage depend strongly on the variable considered. On the one hand, the availability of several meteorological parameters at a local scale and for the European and Mediterranean region is the main advantage of this dataset because it allows analyse in deep the trend of all this variables, and the indices derived from them, in the historical period. On the other hand, this dataset has been used to build E-OBS (Haylock et al. 2008, van den Besselaar et al. 2011), also considered for INTACT, and, thus, the analysis of both dataset lets study the impact/effect of the gridding process in the extreme events at a local scale. 4.2 E-OBS The E-OBS dataset (Haylock et al., 2008) is a European daily high-resolution (0.25°) gridded dataset for precipitation, mean, maximum and minimum temperature for the period 1950-2012, developed in the frame of EU ENSEMBLES project (Van Der Linden and Mitchell, 2009) with the aim of using it for validation of Regional Climate Models and for climate change studies. It was constructed through interpolation of ECA&D station data (the most complete collection of station data over Europe); the number of stations used for the interpolation differs in time and by variable, in particular the period 1961–1990 has the highest density, with more precipitation than temperature stations. Additional station data were obtained from other research projects, such as STARDEX (Haylock et al., 2006), or by 25 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI requesting at various National Meteorological Services. The map of the station network shows uneven station distribution, with the highest station density in the UK, Netherlands and Switzerland. The E-OBS dataset was obtained applying a three stage process: monthly mean values of temperature and precipitation were first interpolated to a rotated pole 0.1° grid using three dimensional thin plate splines; daily anomalies (departure from the monthly mean) were interpolated on the same grid and combined with the monthly mean grid (interpolation was performed applying the kriging method); Finally, the 0.1° grid values were used to compute area-average values at the E-OBS grid resolution. The clear advantage of E-OBS is its spatial and temporal coverage: it represents a valuable standard reference dataset for climate research and is widely used for climate model evaluation over Europe. However, this dataset is affected by a number of potential inaccuracies: typical errors include incorrect station location and inhomogeneities in the station time series. Moreover, interpolation accuracy decreases as the network density decreases (e.g. in southern Europe, especially in Italy, few stations are available) and degrades in complex terrains, such as mountain areas. Hofstra et al. (2009) assessed EOBS with respect to homogeneity of gridded data, finding, according to the Wijngaard test (Wijngaard et al., 2003), many suspect areas for both temperature and precipitation, especially related to the period 1980-1990. Inhomogeneities may lead to meaningless results for trend analysis. Hofstra et al. (2009) also compared E-OBS to existing datasets developed with denser station networks, finding excellent correlations but large mean absolute errors. In particular, with respect to the ELDAS dataset (Rubel et al., 2004), there is a tendency to underestimate precipitation over some areas; a negative bias was also found with respect to the MAP dataset (Frei and Schar, 1998). E-OBS precipitation data were assessed over the Greater Alpine Region (GAR) in Turco et al. (2013): their results suggest that E-OBS does not provide reliable climatology over north western Italy and should be treated with caution, especially for extreme indices over GAR. 4.3 EURO4M-APGD The EURO4M-APGD dataset (Isotta et al., 2013) represents an enhancement of the trans-Alpine precipitation dataset MAP of Frei and Schar (1998). It was developed in the frame of EU project EURO4M (European Reanalysis and Observations for Monitoring), whose aim was the preparation and analysis of datasets for monitoring European climate variations from in situ and satellite observations and from model-based regional reanalyses (International Innovation, 2011). It is a daily gridded dataset for precipitation with spacing of 5 km constructed with a distance-angular weighting scheme that integrates climatological precipitation–topography relationships. The analyses are based on high-resolution rain-gauge data from seven Alpine countries (Austria, Croatia, France, Germany, Italy, Slovenia and Switzerland), with 5500 measurements per day on average, spanning the period 1971–2008. For Austria, France, Germany and Switzerland, the renewed dataset carries on the high data density of the MAP dataset, essentially by extending previously available station records in time, with a density of one station per 80-150 km2. 26 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI For Italy, the major contribution was provided by the archive ARCIS (Archivio Climatologico per l’Italia Settentrionale), which represents a coordination effort of the regional services In northern Italy promoting the exchange and common analysis of long term climate data (Pavan et al., 2013). For Slovenia and Croatia, new datasets have been integrated in the Alpine rain-gauge dataset, providing a valuable contribution for the south-eastern part of the domain. The data collection effort resulted in a significant improvement of data density in previously under-sampled regions and led to more homogenous data coverage. All institutions contributing to the dataset have applied their native quality control procedures before providing data. However, to remedy frequent problems of data quality as evident during the climatological analyses, the consistency and quality of the different data contributions has been ensured; this has been achieved using a three steps quality checking procedure: the scanning of time series for coding problems, a fully automatic spatial consistency check, and the identification of overall suspicious time series. Spatial interpolation procedure does not substantially differ from that for the earlier datasets; changes involve new settings of the method’s parameters that allow better reproduction of fine-scale variations in regions with dense station coverage. A climatological precipitation–topography relationship was included in order to improve the reliability of the resulting grid dataset. The adopted method of spatial analysis relies on the widely used anomaly concept where separate analyses are calculated for some reference condition, typically a long-term mean, and for the relative anomaly from that reference on the day under consideration (Widmann and Bretherton, 2000). Multiplication of the anomaly and reference grids finally yields the daily precipitation analysis. Data are available over the domain from 2 - 17.5° E to 43 – 49° N. The domain extends over about 1200 km from Central France to eastern Austria and over about 700 km from northern Italy to southern Germany. Slovenia and a part of Croatia are also included in the domain. The high resolution will not resolve precipitation at the scale of the grid spacing, but it will improve estimation of spatial averages over complex domain shapes. This is particularly useful in hydrological applications requiring mean precipitation over catchments, or for the evaluation of regional climate models, when the observational grid dataset needs to be assembled onto the model’s native grid structure. 4.4 Spain02 Spain02 (http://www.meteo.unican.es/en/datasets/spain02) is a series of high-resolution daily precipitation and (maximum, minimum and mean) temperature gridded datasets developed for peninsular Spain and the Balearic islands (Herrera et al. 2011, 2012, 2015). A dense network of approximately 2500 quality-controlled stations (250 for temperatures) was selected from the Spanish Meteorological Agency (AEMET) in order to build the gridded products in three different resolutions (0.11º, 0.22º and 0.44º in rotated coordinates matching Euro-CORDEX grids) and four interpolation approaches (OK, AA-OK, AA-2D and AA-3D, see Herrera et al. 2015 for more details) for the period 19712007. 27 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI In the framework of the INTACT project the three resolutions are considered but only the AA-3D interpolation method, due to its better representation of the temperature, its comparability with the EOBS data set, also considered within the project, and because it provides areal representative values, needed to properly evaluate the regional climate model outputs. Different studies have shown the capability of this data set to reproduce both mean and extreme regimes in a region with a great climatic variability like the Iberian Peninsula. The latest version of Spain02 is one of the reference data sets used in different initiatives like the Action Cost VALUE (http://www.value-cost.eu/) or CORDEX (http://wcrp-cordex.ipsl.jussieu.fr/) to calibrate and validate the output of global and regional climate models. In comparison with other data sets included within the INTACT project, the main shortcoming of Spain02 is the variables available which do not include all the parameters needed to build the EWIs considered in this project. 4.5 WATCH-Forcing-Data-ERA-Interim (WFDEI) The Integrated Project Water and Global Change (WATCH, http://www.eu-watch.org/), funded under the EU FP6, brought together the hydrological, water resources and climate communities to analyse, quantify and predict the components of the current and future global water cycles and related water resources states, and to evaluate their uncertainties and clarify the overall vulnerability of global water resources related to the main societal and economic sectors. The WATCH project has produced a large number of data sets publicly available, via the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) Gateway catalogue (https://gateway.ceh.ac.uk/), which are of considerable use in regional and global studies of climate and water (Weedon et al. 2011 and Haddeland et al 2011). In the framework of the INTACT Project, the WATCH-Forcing-Data-ERA-Interim (WFDEI, http://www.euwatch.org/gfx_content/documents/README-WFDEI(1).pdf) data set will be considered, which has been build applying the WFD methodology (Weedon et al. 2011) to ERA-Interim data (Weedon et al. 2014). This data set includes 3-hourly (Average over previous 3 hours) and daily (averages of the 3-hourly data for the current day) meteorological variables (seeTable 4.2) for the global land surface, including Antarctica, at 0.5ºx0.5º resolution for the period 1979-2012. In order to complete the list of variables needed within the INTACT project, the three latest variables included in Table 4.2 have been derived from the 3-hourly data. 28 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI Table 4.2 List of the WFDEI variables considered in the INTACT project Variable Tas wss Ps huss rlds rsds Pr prsn tasmax tasmin wssmax Description 2 m air temperature (instantaneous) 10 m wind speed (instantaneous) Surface pressure (instantaneous) 2 m specific humidity (instantaneous) Long-wave downwards surface radiation flux (average over previous 3 hours) Long-wave downwards surface radiation flux (average over previous 3 hours) Rainfall rate (average over previous 3 hours) Snowfall rate (average over previous 3 hours) Derived Variables 2 m daily maximum air temperature. 2 m daily minimum air temperature. 10 m daily maximum wind speed Units K m/s Pa kg/kg Time 3h / day 3h / day 3h / day 3h / day W/m2 3h / day W/m2 3h / day kg/m2s kg/m2s 3h / day 3h / day K K Day Day day m/s The main shortcoming of this data set is its medium-low spatial resolution (0.5ºx0.5º). However, the high temporal resolution (3-hourly and daily) of WDFEI and the variables available allow the analysis of a great diversity of events, covering the high climatic variability of Europe. 29 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 5 Examples of application Over the last decades, several regions of the world have experienced extreme events with enormous consequences on society and ecosystems. To evaluate the impact of the climatic change in the frequency and intensity of these events in the future, it is necessary to analyse the present conditions and trends of them with different approaches and with different observational datasets. At a European scale, the large climate variability of this region makes difficult to evaluate this change in the extreme events and only some of the indices defined in Table 3.1 and Table 3.2 show a significant trend in the last 30 years, as shown in Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1 Examples of EWI for precipitation, wind and temperature, significant trends, evaluated averaging over the entire Europe, for the time period 1980-2010, for the ECA&D data set. NORTH, WEST and EAST indicate the numbers of days in which the wind has the corresponding direction. The number in the title is the trend value. Only the indices with a significant trend have been included. 30 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI In Figure 5.1, an increasing of the intensity and frequency of heavy rainy days is shown. For the wind speed and direction, a decreasing of the intensity and the frequency of strong winds is reflected but also the calm days decrease and a change in the more frequent directions have been found. Finally, the changes in temperatures affect mainly to the minimum temperatures, leading to changes in the daily range. Figure 5.2 Map of the trend over Europe at a local scale for some temperature EWI reported in Table 3.1 over the period 1981-2010 using the ECA&D dataset. FD: frost days; ID: ice days; FTD: frost-thaw cycles; SU: summer days; TR: tropical nights; HW: heat waves. If we analyse more in details the trends in Europe at a local scale, there are many differences between regions and indices. For example, Figure 5.2 and Figure 5.3 show the significant trends for several temperature indicators. In the case of the summer days (SU) there is a global increasing trend in all Europe but, in the case of tropical nights (TR) or heat waves (HW) we can find a dipole with a stable situation in the north and a positive trend in the south. Other most noisy and complex spatial patterns could be found. Figure 5.3 Map of the trend over Europe at a local scale for some temperature EWI reported in Table 3.1 over the period 1981-2010 using the ECA&D dataset. TXN: minimum of maximum temperature; TXX: maximum of maximum temperature; GSL: growing season th th length; TN90P: days with TN>90 percentile; TX90P: days with TX>90 percentile. 31 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI In the case of precipitation (Figure 5.4), with the exception of the frequency of dry days which tends to decrease in almost all Europe, there is not a common trend in the region, as could be expected. Figure 5.4 Map of the trend over Europe at a local scale for some precipitation EWI reported in Table 3.1 over the period 1981-2010 using the ECA&D dataset. RR1: days with PRCP≥1mm; CWD: consecutive wet days; RX1DAY: maximum 1-day precipitation; PRCPTOT: annual precipitation; CDD: consecutive dry days; RX5DAY: maximum 5-day precipitation. Considering the return values for 50 and 100 years of the different variables we can only analyse or estimate what are the value which can be expected to occur once in a given period. Changes in these return values are associated with the increase/decrease of the occurrence of extreme events in a climatological period. In Figure 5.5 and Figure 5.6 the return values for 50 and 100 years are shown. 32 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI Some of the European climatic characteristics are reflected in these figures, for example the temperate climate or the extreme character of the precipitation in the Mediterranean. Figure 5.5 Maps of 50-years return value of precipitation, snow depth, wind speed and temperatures of the ECA&D dataset for the period 1981-2010. Figure 5.6 100-years return value of precipitation, snow depth, wind speed and temperatures of the ECA&D dataset for the period 1981-2010. In order to analyse the uncertainty and robustness of these results, is advisable to compare them with those obtained with other data sets. In this case, we repeated the same analysis with the WFDEI data set introduced in the previous section, considering the available variables of this data set ( 33 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI Figure 5.7 and Figure 5.8). 34 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI Figure 5.7 Map of the trend over Europe at a local scale for some precipitation EWI reported in Table 3.1 over the period 1981-2010 using the WFDEI dataset. In the case of precipitation, the regions with significant trends are scarce and very sparse, and no global conclusions can be obtained. Figure 5.8 Map of the trend over Europe at a local scale for some precipitation EWI reported in the Table 3.1 over the period 1981-2010 using the WFDEI dataset. For temperature there is more agreement between the data sets than for precipitation, including the dipole between the absence of trend in the north and the increasing trend in the south. 35 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 6 Conclusions and future work This document aimed to describe the activity finalized to define appropriate EWIs for the characterization of extreme events according to definitions and thresholds critical for infrastructures, in a European climate change context. There is not a universally accepted procedure for this purpose, since it is not possible to provide a unique definition of “extreme”. In this work, we have referred to the IPCC Assessment Report 4 (IPCC, 2007), which defines an extreme climatic event as one that is rare within its statistical reference distribution at a particular place and time. To gain a uniform perspective on observed changes in in climate extremes, ETCCDI has defined a core set of descriptive indices of extremes, which has been extended to other variables within the ECA&D project. In this work, we have also considered some indicators used by Weather Meteorological Services to establish weather alerts and warnings, and other combined indicators. This extension will allow synthesizing the combination effects of meteorological variables into EWIs in order to better support the management of CI in Europe. Design is generally performed under the hypothesis that climate is stationary; however, this approach could be no more adequate, since it is evident that climate changes are unequivocal and will alter the mean, variability and extremes. Examples of EWIs significant trends have been shown, obtained averaging observational data over the entire European area or over some subdomains. They highlight that, at European scale, the large climate variability makes difficult to evaluate this change in the extreme events and only some of the indices show a significant trend over the last thirty years. In the following of the activity, evaluation of EWIs related historical data series provided by high resolution RCM simulations will be performed. Since, as already shown, results strongly depend on the quality of the data considered; there would be an uncertainty source to be considered in the evaluation of the RCMs. In the same way, future climate projections from RCMs will be analysed for different European zones and different time horizons, considering periods of at least thirty years. It is well known that, to obtain regional or local projections, high resolution data sets are needed with all the target variables used to define the EWIs: limitations related to the spatial resolution of available simulations (about 10 km) must be taken into account, as well as limitations connected with time resolution, since data at daily resolution are currently available at most. The characterization of EW will be performed according with thresholds critical for infrastructures. Typical threshold values will be generally taken from literature works. Absolute thresholds are suitable in order to monitor extreme events that affect human society and the natural environment, while percentile thresholds are specific of the sites, since they are expressions of anomalies relative to the local climate. Moreover, specific threshold values related to stakeholder’s and user’s needs will be considered. Since model outputs are affected by biases, most of them non-systematic, it is necessary to take into account the effects of them in the calculation of the indices, mainly in the case of absolute threshold-dependent indicators. In this sense, percentile thresholds are more robust than the absolute ones. 36 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 7 References 1. Alexander LV, Zhang X, Peterson TC, Caesar J, Gleason B, Klein Tank AMG, Haylock M, Collins D, Trewin B, Rahimzadeh F, Tagipour A, Kumar Kolli R, Revadekar JV, Griffiths G, Vincent L, Stephenson DB, Burn J, Aguilar E, Brunet M, Taylor M, New M, Zhai P, Rusticucci M, Vazquez Aguirre JL, 2006, Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 111:D05109. 2. Beniston M, Stephenson D, Christensen O, Ferro C, Frei C, Goyette S, Halsnaes, Holt T, Jylhä K, Koffi B, Palutikof J, Schöll R, Semmler T, Woth K, 2007, Future extreme events in European climate: an exploration of regional climate model projections, Climatic Change, 81: 71–95. Doi 10.1007/s10584006-9226-z 3. Christensen JH, Christensen OB, 2007, A summary of the PRUDENCE model projections of change in European climate by the end of this century. Climatic Change 81: 7–30. Doi: 10.1007/s10584-0069210-7 4. Coles S, 2001, An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values, Springer, London, pp. 208. 5. EUPORIAS, 2014, EUropean Provision Of Regional Impact Assessment on a Seasonal-to-decadal timescale, 1st periodic report, available at: www.euporias.eu 6. European Commission, 2013, Commission Staff Working Document Adapting infrastructure to climate change, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/adaptation/what/docs/swd_2013_137_en.pdf 7. Frei C, Schär C, 1998, precipitation climatology of the Alps from high resolution rain-gauge observation, International Journal of Climatology 18: 873–900. Doi: 10.1002/(SICI)10970088(19980630)18:8<873::AID-JOC255>3.0.CO;2-9 8. Giorgi F, 2005, Climate Change Prediction, Climatic Change, 73: 239-265. Doi: 10.1007/s10584-0056857-4 9. Giorgi F, Jones C, Asrar GR.,2009, Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework. WMO Bullettin, 58(3): 175– 183. 10. Giorgi F, Lionello P, 2008. Climate change projections for the Mediterranean region. Global and Planetary Change 63: 90–104. Doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.09.005 11. Giorgi F, Mearns L, 1991, Approaches to the simulation of regional climate change: a review. Reviews of Geophysics, 29(2): 191-216. 12. Haddeland I, Clark DB, Franssen W, Ludwig F, Voß F, Arnell NW, Bertrand N, Best M, Folwell S, Gerten D, Gomes S, Gosling SN, Hagemann S, Hanasaki N, Harding R, Heinke J, Kabat P, Koirala S, Oki T, Polcher J, Stacke T, Viterbo P, Weedon GP, and Yeh P, 2011, Multimodel Estimate of the Global Terrestrial Water Balance: Setup and First Results. J. Hydrometeor, 12, 869–884. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1324.1 13. Haylock, MR, Cawley GC, Harpham C, Wilby RL, Goodess C, 2006, Downscaling heavy precipitation over the UK: A comparison of dynamical and statistical methods and their future scenarios, Int. J. Climatol., 26, 1397–1415. Doi:10.1002/joc.1318. 37 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 14. Haylock MR, Hofstra N, Klein Tank AMG, Klok EJ, Jones PD, New M, 2008, A European daily highresolution gridded data set of surface temperature and precipitation for 1950-2006. Journal of Geophysical Research 113:D20119. Doi: 10.1029/2008JD010201 15. Herrera S, 2011, Desarrollo, validación y aplicaciones de Spain02: Una rejilla de alta resolución de observaciones interpoladas para precipitación y temperatura en España. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de Cantabria, available at http://www.meteo.unican.es/tesis/herrera. 16. Herrera S, Gutiérrez JM, Ancell R, Pons MR, Frías MD, Fernández J, 2012, Development and analysis of a 50-year high-resolution daily gridded precipitation dataset over Spain (Spain02), Int. J. Climatol., 32, 74–85 17. Herrera S, Fernández J, Gutiérrez JM, 2015, Update of the Spain02 Gridded Observational Dataset for Euro-CORDEX evaluation: Assessing the Effect of the Interpolation Methodology, submitted to Int. J. Climatol. 18. Hofstra N, Haylock M, New M, Jones PD. 2009. Testing E-OBS European high-resolution gridded data set of daily precipitation and surface temperature. Journal of Geophysical Research 114:D21101. Doi: 10.1029/2009JD011799 19. Hokstad P, Utne I, Vatn J (Eds.), 2012, Risk and Interdependencies in Critical Infrastructures, Springer-Verlag London, pp.252. 20. Hov O, Cubasch U, Fischer E, Höppe P, Iversen T, Kvamsto N, Kundzewicz Z, Rezacova D, Rios D, Santos F, Schädler B, Veisz O, Zerefos C, Benestad R, Murlis J, Donat M, Leckebusch G, Ulbrich U, 2013, Extreme Weather Events in Europe: preparing for climate change adaptation, The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, ISBN 978-82-7144-100-5 21. International Innovation, 2011, Environment Monitoring a changing climate. In Confronting the Pressures on Ecosystem Services. International Innovation. August 2011, 16–18. 22. IPCC, 2007, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A. (eds.)). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 104 23. IPCC, 2012, Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disaster to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Field CB et al. (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK) and New York (USA), pp. 582 24. Isotta FA, Frei C, Weilguni V, Tadić MP, Lassègues P, Rudolf B, Pavan V, Cacciamani C, Antolini G, Ratto SM, Munari M, Micheletti S, Bonati V, Lussana C, Ronchi C, Panettieri E, Marigo G, Vertačnik G, 2014, The climate of daily precipitation in the Alps: development and analysis of a high-resolution grid dataset from pan-Alpine rain-gauge data. International Journal of Climatology 34(5): 1657– 1675. Doi: 10.1002/joc.3794 25. Jacob D, Petersen J, Eggert B, Alias A, Christensen OB, Bouwer LM, Braun A, Colette A, Déqué, M, Georgievski G, Georgopoulou E, Gobiet A, Menut L, Nikulin G, Haensler A, Hempelmann N, Jones C, Keuler K, Kovats S, Kröner N, Kotlarski S, Kriegsmann A, Martin E, van Meijgaard E, Moseley C, Pfeifer S, Preuschmann S, Radermacher C, Radtke K, Rechid D, Rounsevell M, Samuelsson P, Somot S, Soussana JF, Teichmann C, Valentini R, Vautard R, Weber B, Yiou P, 2014, EURO-CORDEX: new 38 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. high-resolution climate change projections for European impact research. Regional Environmental Change 14: 563–578. Doi: 10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2 Katz RW, Brown BG, 1992, Extreme events in a changing climate: variability is more important than averages. Climatic Change 21: 289-302. Doi: 10.1007/BF00139728 Kendall MG, 1975, Kendall rank correlation methods. Griffin, London. Kislov AV, Krenke AN, 2009, Climate-Related Hazards in: Natural Disaster Vol. II, Encyclopedia of Life Support System, UNESCO. Klein Tank AMG, Wijngaard JB, Können GP, Böhm R, Demarée G, Gocheva A, Mileta M, Pashiardis S, Hejkrlik L, Kern-Hansen C, Heino R, Bessemoulin P, Müller-Westermeier G, Tzanakou M, Szalai S, Pálsdóttir T, Fitzgerald D, Rubin S, Capaldo M, Maugeri M, Leitass A, Bukantis A, Aberfeld R, van Engelen AFV, Forland E, Mietus M, Coelho F, Mares C, Razuvaev V, Nieplova E, Cegnar T, Antonio López J, Dahlström B, Moberg A, Kirchhofer W, Ceylan A, Pachaliuk O, Alexander LV and Petrovic P, 2002, Daily dataset of 20th-century surface air temperature and precipitation series for the European Climate Assessment, Int. J. Climatol., 22: 1441–1453. doi: 10.1002/joc.773 Klein Tank AMG, Konnen GP, 2003, Trends in indices of daily temperature and precipitation extremes in Europe, 1946-49, Journal of Climate, 16: 3665-3680. Klein Tank AMG, Zwiers FW, Zhang X, 2009, Guidelines on Analysis of extremes in a changing climate in support of informed decisions for adaptation, WMO Geneva p.56 (WCDMP-72, WMOTD/No. 1500) Kotlarski S, Keuler K, Christensen OB, Colette A, Déqué M, Gobiet A, Goergen K, Jacob D, Lüthi D. van Meijgaard E, Nikulin G, Schär C, Teichmann C, Vautard R, Warrach-Sagi K, Wulfmeyer V, 2014, Regional climate modeling on European scales: A joint standard evaluation of the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble. Geoscientific Model Development 7: 1297–1333. Doi: 10.5194/gmd-7-1297-2014 Maraun D, Wetterhall F, Ireson AM, Chandler RE, Kendon EJ, Widmann M, Brienen S, Rust HW, Sauter T, Themeßl M, Venema VKC, Chun KP, Goodess CM, Jones RG, Onof C, Vrac M, Thiele-Eich I, 2010, Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Reviews of Geophysics, 48: RG3003. Doi: 10.1029/2009RG000314. Munich Re, 2011, Topics Geo Natural catastrophes 2010: Analyses, assessments, positions. Tech. rep. Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft. Pavan V, Antolini G, Agrillo G, Auteri L, Barbero R, Bonati V, Brunier F, Cacciamani C, Cazzuli O, Cicogna A, De Luigi C, Maraldo L, Marigo G, Millini R, Panettieri E, Ratto S, Ronchi C, Saibanti S, Sulis A, Tomei F, Tomozeiu R, Torlai I, Villani G, 2013, The ARCIS project. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology, 2. Peterson TC, Stott PA, Herring S. (Eds), 2012, Explaining Extreme Events of 2011 from a Climate Perspective. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 1041–1067. Doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-12/00021.1 Rubel F, Skomorowski P, Brugger K, 2004, A new 3-hourly precipitation dataset for NWP model verification and data assimilation studies. In: Proceedings 4th Study conference on BALTEX, Gudhjern, Denmark, 24-28 May 2004. 39 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 38. Rummukainen M. 2010. State-of-the-art with regional climate models. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1: 82–96. Doi: 10.1002/wcc.8 w 39. Soares PMM, Cardoso RM, Miranda PMA, Viterbo P, Belo-Pereira M, 2012, Assessment of the ENSEMBLES regional climate models in the representation of precipitation variability and extremes over Portugal. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 117. Doi: 10.1029/2011JD016768 40. Stephenson DB, 2008, Definition, diagnosis and origin of extreme weather and climate events. In: Diaz HF, Murnane RJ (eds) Climate extreme and society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 41. Turco M, Zollo A, Ronchi C, De Luigi C, Mercogliano P, 2013, Assessing gridded observations for daily precipitation extremes in the Alps with a focus on northwest Italy. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 13: 1457–1468. Doi:10.5194/nhess-13-1457-2013 42. UNCTAD, 2009, World Investment Report, Transnational Corporation, Agricultural Production and Development, United Nations, New York (USA) and Geneva (Switzerland). 43. Van den Besselaar EJM, Haylock MR, van der Schrier G, and Klein Tank AMG, 2011, A European Daily High-resolution Observational Gridded Data set of Sea Level Pressure. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D11110, doi:10.1029/2010JD015468 44. Van Der Linden P, Mitchell J, 2009, Ensembles: Climate change and its impacts: Summary of research and results from the ensembles project. Met Office Hadley Centre 2: 1–160. 45. VALUE, 2013, RacheWhite paper on climate data for end-user, available at www.value-cost.eu 46. Vautard R, Gobiet A, Jacob D, Belda M, Colette A, Déqué M, Fernández J, García-Díez M, Goergen K, Güttler I, Halenka T, Karacostas T, Katragkou E, Keuler K, Kotlarski S, Mayer S, van Meijgaard E, Nikulin G, Patarčíč M, Scinocca J, Sobolowski S, Suklitsch M, Teichmann C, Warrach-Sagi K, Wulfmeyer V, Yiou P. 2013. The simulation of European heat waves from an ensemble of regional climate models within the EURO-CORDEX project. Climate Dynamics 41: 2555–2575. Doi: 10.1007/s00382-013-1714-z 47. Weedon, GP, Gomes S, Viterbo P, Österle H, Adam JC, Bellouin N, Boucher O, Best M, 2010, The WATCH Forcing Data 1958-2001: a meteorological forcing dataset for land surface and hydrological models. WATCH Tech. Rep. 22, 41p [Available at http://www.eu-watch.org.] 48. Weedon GP, Gomes S, Viterbo P, Shuttleworth WJ, Blyth E, Österle H, Adam JC, Bellouin N, Boucher O, and Best M, 2011, Creation of the WATCH Forcing Data and its use to assess global and regional reference crop evaporation over land during the twentieth century, J. Hydrometeorol., 12, 823–848, doi:10.1175/2011JHM1369.1. 49. Weedon GP, Balsamo G, Bellouin N, Gomes S, Best MJ, and Viterbo P, 2014, The WFDEI meteorological forcing data set: WATCH Forcing Data methodology applied to ERA-Interim reanalysis data. Water Resources Research, 50, doi:10.1002/2014WR015638. 50. Wehner M, 2013, Methods in projecting future changes in extremes, in: Extremes in a Changing Climate, AghaKouchak A. et al (eds), pp, 223-237, Springer, New York, London. 51. Widmann M, Bretherton CS, 2000, Validation of mesoscale precipitation in the NCEP reanalysis using a new gridpoint dataset for the northwestern US. Journal of Climate 13: 1936–1950. 40 D2.1 – DEFINITION OF DIFFERENT EWIS, TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF EUROPEAN CI 52. Wilbanks T, Fernandez L (Lead Authors), 2012, Climate Change and Infrastructure, Urban Systems, and Vulnerabilities, Technical Report for the U.S. Department of Energy in Support of the National Climate Assessment. 53. Wilbanks T, Kates R, 2010, Beyond Adapting to Climate Change: Embedding Adaptation in Responses to Multiple Threats and Stresses, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100(4): 719– 728. 54. Wijngaard J, Klein Tank A, Können P, 2003, Homogeneity of 20th century European daily temperature and precipitation series. International Journal of Climatology 23: 679–692. Doi: 10.1002/joc.906 55. Zhang X, Zwiers FW, 2013, Statistical indices for the diagnosis and detecting changes in extremes, in: Extremes in a Changing Climate, AghaKouchak A. et al (eds), pp, 1-14, Springer, New York, London. 56. Zwiers FW, Zhang X, Feng Y, 2011, Anthropogenic Influence on Long Return Period Daily Temperature Extremes at Regional Scales. Journal of Climate, 24, 881–892. Doi: 10.1175/2010JCLI3908.1 41