* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Abstract - IJCMAAS
DNA barcoding wikipedia , lookup
DNA sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Comparative genomic hybridization wikipedia , lookup
Molecular evolution wikipedia , lookup
Agarose gel electrophoresis wikipedia , lookup
Maurice Wilkins wikipedia , lookup
SNP genotyping wikipedia , lookup
Real-time polymerase chain reaction wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup
Gel electrophoresis of nucleic acids wikipedia , lookup
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup
Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup
Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup
Transformation (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE International Journal of Current Medical And Applied Sciences. [IJCMAAS] Volume: 12, Issue: 1, September -2016, pp: 14-19. DNA Extraction by Perchlorate Method. A. K. Harith1, K. Bhatia2 & D. Agarwal3 Classified Specialist (Pathology and Biochemistry) , Command Hospital, Pune [MS], India. Professor, 3Gd Specialist, Department of Biochemistry, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune [MS], India. 1 2Assistant --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abstract: Introduction: The quality and quantity of DNA extracted from cell suspension is a critical aspect while performing molecular biology tests. Most of the laboratories are using kit based DNA extraction methods, which is expensive. We compared the kit based DNA extraction with a conventional technique of DNA extraction based on the Perchlorate technique. Material and Method: DNA was extracted on 60 samples by the kit based techniques and the Perchlorate Method (PC method) and compared for both quality and quantity of DNA extracted. DNA was also extracted from 15 samples with a total leukocyte count of less than 3000/cmm and compared, as it was felt that the yield of DNA from the kit method in such samples would be low. Results: The yield of DNA by the kit method was 53 ± 6.2 ng/µL while that of the PC method was 431± 67 ng/µL. On an average the PC method had a better yield of DNA as compared to the kit method. In samples with low TLC count, the yield of DNA by the conventional method was significantly better than that of the kit method (119± 44 ng/µL vs 23 ± 7.2 ng/µL). Conclusion: The PC method provides high yield of good quality DNA at a more economical rate as compared to the kit based methods. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Address for correspondence: Dr. A. K. Harith, Access this Article Online Classified Specialist, Department of Biochemistry, Website: Command Hospital, Pune, [MS] , India. www.ijcmaas.com Email ID: [email protected] [email protected] How to cite this article: A. K. Harith, K. Bhatia & D. Agarwal: DNA Extraction by Perchlorate Method.. : International Journal of current Medical and Applied sciences; 2016, 12(1), 14-19 . . . Subject: Medical Sciences Quick Response Code