Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Hedgehog signaling pathway wikipedia , lookup
Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup
Histone acetylation and deacetylation wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup
List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup
VLDL receptor wikipedia , lookup
C/EBP BETA IS INVOLVED IN THE REGULATION OF TISSUE SPECIFIC EXPRESSION OF CARTILAGE-DERIVED RETINOIC ACID-SENSITIVE PROTEIN *OKAZAKI, K (A-NIH); *LI, J (A-NIH); +*SANDELL, L J (A-NIH) +*Washington University School of Medicine at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Louis, MO. 314-454-7800, Fax: 314-454-5900, [email protected] Introduction Cartilage-derived retinoic acid-sensitive protein (CD-RAP) is a secretory protein primarily expressed in chondrocytes, but can be stimulated in chondrosarcoma, melanoma and breast cancer1)2). CD-RAP is thought to affect the metastatic activities of tumor cells by interfering with the attachment of cells to the extracellular matrix3)4), but its physiological function in chondrogenesis is unclear. During embryonic development, CD-RAP is expressed from the beginning of chondrogenesis and the distribution of the expression is restricted to cartilage with an only exception being the mammary bud. We have previously generated transgenic mice harbouring 2251 bp or 2068 bp promoter of CD-RAP linked to β-galactosidase reporter gene. The analysis of the transgene expression indicated that the 2251 bp promoter induced the reporter gene expression in all cartilage, but the 2068 bp promoter did not induce any expression5). This suggests that the 183 bp fragment between –2251 to –2068 may contain important elements responsible to cartilage specific expression. In this study, transcription factors that bind to the 183 bp fragment were analyzed. We report here the characterization and function of a binding protein, C/EBPβ, a member of the CAAT/enhancer binding protein family of transcription factors, that binds to the 183 bp fragment and acts as an repressor of CD-RAP expression in undifferentiated C5.18 cells. Methods Identification of the factors which bind to the 183 bp fragment. As the database analysis revealed a lot of potential elements around –2100, A fragment from –2039 to –2119 was amplified by PCR, and used as a probe for the electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). The nuclear extract was isolated from C5.18, rat chondrogenic cell line, and various fragments within the probe sequence were used as cold competitors. For supershift analysis, various antibodies were incubated prior to adding the probe. The molecular size of C/EBPβ in the nuclear extract was analysed by Western blot. Transient transfection assay Various promoters, 2251 and 2068, were subcloned into the luciferase reporter plasmid pGL3-basic. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed within the C/EBPβ binding site in the 2251-pGL3b. Each plasmid was co-transfected with CMV-β-Gal internal control plasmid into C5.18 cells. The luciferase activities were assayed and normalised to the β-galactosidase value. tissue specific expression. Our previous study of transgenic mice showed that 2251 promoter is sufficient for the tissue specific expression in vivo, but 2068 (without the 183) is not. In preliminary studies, we have expressed a longer CD-RAP promoter (3345 bp) that generates strong tissue-specific expression. When the 183 bp fragment is removed from this construct, CD-RAP is expressed widely in the animal. Consequently, the 183 bp fragment could be absolutely critical for the chondrocyte-specific expression of CD-RAP. This factor may also be important for other cartilage-specific gene expression. C5.18 NE Competitor C/EBPβ antibody + - + cold - + mu - + - + + Fig.1 EMSA for C/EBPβ binding site with C5.18 nuclear extract. Competitor: cold; 100-fold excess cold probe, mu; C/EBP binding site-mutant Results The EMSA analysis revealed that C/EBPβ binds within the183 bp fragment, from nucleotide –2074 to –2082 (Fig 1). Western blot analysis of the C5.18 nuclear extract showed that C/EBPβ was present as both the longer isoform of 38kDa (called LAP) and the truncated one of 20kDa (called LIP). Sitedirected mutagenesis at the C/EBP β binding site in the 2251 promoter showed about 2-fold up regulation of luciferase activities compared to the wild type 2251 promoter by transient transfection in C5.18 cells (Fig 2). Discussion The 183 bp CD-RAP promoter fragment contains indispensable elements for tissue specific expression of CD-RAP. C/EBPβ binds to this DNA and functions as a repressor. C/EBPβ is a member of CAAT/enhancer binding protein family, which is a prototype family of basic leucine zipper transcription factors. C/EBPβ can act as a repressor or activator depending on the concentration of subunits LIP and LAP in the nucleus: that is, LAP forms dimers with itself or other C/EBP that enhance gene expression while LIP forms a heterodimer with LAP or other C/EBP and represses gene expression6). C5.18 has features of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells and has the potential to obtain chondrocytic phenotypes during extended culture after confluence. The presence of both subunits of C/EBPβ in C5.18 cells is consistent with the low level of CD-RAP expression, and the repressor activity C/EBPβ. These data suggest that C/EBPβ may function to suppress the CD-RAP expression in mesenchymal cells and contributes to its restricted Fig 2. Relative luciferase activities of C5.18 cells transfected with luciferase reporter vectors which contains 2251 promoter or the 2251 promoter harbouring C/EBP binding site-mutant. References 1.Dietz UH, Sandell LJ J. Biol. Chem. 271:3311-3316 2. Bosserhoff AK, Moser M, et al. J. Pathol. 187:446-454, 1999 3. Guba M, Bosserhoff AK, et al. Br. J. Cancer 83:1216-1222, 2000 4. Stoll R, Renner C, et al. EMBO J 20:340-349, 2001 5. Xie WF, Zhang X, Sandell LJ Matrix Biol. 19:501-509, 2000 6. Descombes P, Schibler U Cell 67:569-579, 1991 48th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society Poster No: 0325