Download Disability Theory in A Separate Peace

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

NEDD9 wikipedia , lookup

Copy-number variation wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Saethre–Chotzen syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup

The Selfish Gene wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup

Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Gene desert wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Word Count: 240
Works Cited Included
Rachael Mulvihill
Abstract for Segue Conference
March 10, 2017
Disability Theory in A Separate Peace
In the article “Refusing the Queer Potential,” Eric L. Tribunella argues that “the rhetoric
of ethics, values, and patriotism” in John Knowles’s A Separate Peace “‘appropriates’ gender
and sexuality in adolescent males and promotes their normative maturation” (Tribunella 125).
Normative in this circumstance is distinguished as straight, white, masculine males. Tribunella
argues that Finny must die in order for Gene to abandon his queer tendencies and accept the
heteronormative standards of society to mature into manhood. I intend to push this argument
even further by claiming that society not only preserves the heteronormative future, but also the
able-bodied future. First, I will argue that the vision of society as able-bodied explains why Gene
“becomes” Finny gradually throughout the novel. To conclude I will contend that only “supercrips” are welcomed into our society. This will further explain why when Gene fully “absorbs”
Finny, as theorist James Holt McGavran states, that Finny dies (McGavran 68). His image as a
cripple no longer fits into the heteronormative, abled-bodied future.
I will also interrogate the progression of Finny and Gene from counterparts to a type of
parasitic relationship. In the beginning of the novel, Finny and Gene are seen as counterparts to
other another. However, after Finny is crippled his body can no longer act as the counterpart to
Gene’s body. I’m interested in how this change affects the reading of the novel and how this shift
in rapport alters the future for Gene.
Word Count: 240
Works Cited Included
Works Cited
Knowles, John. A Separate Peace. New York: Scribner, 1987. Print.
McGavran, James Holt. “Fear’s Echo and Unhinged Joy: Crossing Homosocial Boundaries in A
Separate Peace. Children’s Literature. 30 (2002): 67-80. Project MUSE. Web. 24
February 2017.
Tribunella, Eric L. “Refusing the Queer Potential: John Knowles’s A Separate Peace.”
Children’s Literature. 30 (2002): 81-95. Project MUSE. Web. 24 February 2017.