* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Figure S2 - Development
Survey
Document related concepts
RNA silencing wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding RNA wikipedia , lookup
Promoter (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Gene desert wikipedia , lookup
X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup
RNA interference wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup
Expression vector wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Messenger RNA wikipedia , lookup
Transcriptional regulation wikipedia , lookup
Gene regulatory network wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
bozozok acts as a strong bicoid antimorph in Drosophila Given the similarity of the homeodomain of Boz to that of the Drosophila gene bicoid (bcd), we argue that Boz might be able to bind bcd sites in the Drosophila embryo (indeed, we were able to show that Boz binds Bcd-binding sites, see Fig. 5A). Under the control of the nanos promoter, we expressed an mRNA encoding the full-length boz ORF, and containing 3 bcd mRNA localization signals, during Drosophila oogenesis. Signals for anterior mRNA localization remain functional in this hybrid gene (data not shown). Embryos from females carrying one copy of the bcd-boz transgene express a dominant phenotype resembling that of bcd null mutants (see Fig. S2A-D): head, thorax and anterior abdomen do not develop. In contrast to the bcd phenotype, however, embryos from bcd-boz transgenic females do not form a duplicated telson. Embryos from females with one copy of the bcd-boz transgene do not establish the anterior expression domain of the gap gene hunchback (Fig. S2E,F), which is directly activated by Bcd in wild-type embryos (Driever et al., 1989). Segmentation is distorted in the thorax and anterior abdomen, as revealed by even-skipped expression (Fig. S2G,H), which appears similar to or stronger than that observed in bcd mutant embryos (Driever and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1988). The differences in phenotypes may be explained by different effects of bcd loss-of-function and bcd antimorphic activities on development: A Bicoid-repressor fusion would also repress Krüppel, which in bicoid mutants is still activated by hunchback. This may explain the more pronounced abdominal defects in embryos from bcd-boz females. Furthermore, given the interactions between the terminal system and boz (increased dosage of boz can rescue anterior terminal defects in terminal class mutants; bcd and the terminal system have common downstream targets) (Schaeffer et al., 2000), zygotic anterior terminal genes are also influenced by bcd. A loss-of-function bcd allele is expected to have different effects on anterior terminal development when compared with the potential dominant-negative effect of a repressor binding to Bicoid binding sites. Our data indicate that the bcd-boz gene has an antimorphic activity with respect to bcd as it phenocopies bcd mutant defects in a dominant fashion. Such a finding is consistent with Boz serving as a transcriptional repressor that can compete with Bcd for binding to target sites and prevent Bcd-mediated activation of downstream targets. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the analysis of boz activity in Drosophila, the boz-coding region was cloned into the P-element-based pCaSpeR vector to be framed by 1.1 kb of the nanos 5’ upstream region and the bcd 3’ UTR (E. Wimmer, unpublished) (Niessing et al., 1999). Transgenic lines were generated by P-element-mediated germline transformation (Rivera-Pomar et al., 1995). The boz containing mRNA was localized correctly at the anterior tip of the embryo (data not shown). Transformed fly strains were maintained through males only, as the transgene induced lethality in embryos when transmitted through females. Transformants were crossed to bcdE1 mutants (Frohnhoefer and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1986). Expression of hunchback was visualized using digoxigenin labeled RNA probes (Roche), and expression of even-skipped by immunohistochemistry using Cy3 (Jackson Laboratories). REFERENCES Driever, W. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1988). The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner. Cell 54, 95-104. Driever, W., Thoma, G. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1989). Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen. Nature 340, 363-7. Frohnhoefer, H. G. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1986). Organization of anterior patter in the Drosophila embryo by the maternal gene bicoid. Nature 324, 120-125. Niessing, D., Dostatni, N., Jäckle, H. and Rivera-Pomar, R. (1999). Sequence interval within the PEST motif of Bicoid is important for translational repression of caudal mRNA in the anterior region of the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 18, 1966-1973. Rivera-Pomar, R., Lu, X., Perrimon, N., Taubert, H. and Jäckle, H. (1995). Activation of posterior gap gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm. Nature 376, 254-256. Schaeffer, V., Killian, D., Desplan, C., and Wimmer, E. A. (2000). High Bicoid levels render the terminal system dispensable for Drosophila head development. Development 127, 3993-3999.