Download Figure S2 - Development

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

RNA silencing wikipedia , lookup

Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup

Non-coding RNA wikipedia , lookup

Promoter (genetics) wikipedia , lookup

Gene desert wikipedia , lookup

X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup

Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup

RNA interference wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup

Lac operon wikipedia , lookup

Expression vector wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Messenger RNA wikipedia , lookup

Transcriptional regulation wikipedia , lookup

Gene regulatory network wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression wikipedia , lookup

Silencer (genetics) wikipedia , lookup

Epitranscriptome wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
bozozok acts as a strong bicoid antimorph in Drosophila
Given the similarity of the homeodomain of Boz to that of the Drosophila gene bicoid (bcd), we argue that Boz
might be able to bind bcd sites in the Drosophila embryo (indeed, we were able to show that Boz binds Bcd-binding
sites, see Fig. 5A). Under the control of the nanos promoter, we expressed an mRNA encoding the full-length boz
ORF, and containing 3 bcd mRNA localization signals, during Drosophila oogenesis. Signals for anterior mRNA
localization remain functional in this hybrid gene (data not shown). Embryos from females carrying one copy of the
bcd-boz transgene express a dominant phenotype resembling that of bcd null mutants (see Fig. S2A-D): head, thorax
and anterior abdomen do not develop. In contrast to the bcd phenotype, however, embryos from bcd-boz transgenic
females do not form a duplicated telson. Embryos from females with one copy of the bcd-boz transgene do not
establish the anterior expression domain of the gap gene hunchback (Fig. S2E,F), which is directly activated by Bcd
in wild-type embryos (Driever et al., 1989). Segmentation is distorted in the thorax and anterior abdomen, as
revealed by even-skipped expression (Fig. S2G,H), which appears similar to or stronger than that observed in bcd
mutant embryos (Driever and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1988).
The differences in phenotypes may be explained by different effects of bcd loss-of-function and bcd antimorphic
activities on development: A Bicoid-repressor fusion would also repress Krüppel, which in bicoid mutants is still
activated by hunchback. This may explain the more pronounced abdominal defects in embryos from bcd-boz
females. Furthermore, given the interactions between the terminal system and boz (increased dosage of boz can
rescue anterior terminal defects in terminal class mutants; bcd and the terminal system have common downstream
targets) (Schaeffer et al., 2000), zygotic anterior terminal genes are also influenced by bcd. A loss-of-function bcd
allele is expected to have different effects on anterior terminal development when compared with the potential
dominant-negative effect of a repressor binding to Bicoid binding sites.
Our data indicate that the bcd-boz gene has an antimorphic activity with respect to bcd as it phenocopies bcd
mutant defects in a dominant fashion. Such a finding is consistent with Boz serving as a transcriptional repressor that
can compete with Bcd for binding to target sites and prevent Bcd-mediated activation of downstream targets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For the analysis of boz activity in Drosophila, the boz-coding region was cloned into the P-element-based pCaSpeR vector to be
framed by 1.1 kb of the nanos 5’ upstream region and the bcd 3’ UTR (E. Wimmer, unpublished) (Niessing et al., 1999).
Transgenic lines were generated by P-element-mediated germline transformation (Rivera-Pomar et al., 1995). The boz containing
mRNA was localized correctly at the anterior tip of the embryo (data not shown). Transformed fly strains were maintained
through males only, as the transgene induced lethality in embryos when transmitted through females. Transformants were crossed
to bcdE1 mutants (Frohnhoefer and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1986). Expression of hunchback was visualized using digoxigenin labeled
RNA probes (Roche), and expression of even-skipped by immunohistochemistry using Cy3 (Jackson Laboratories).
REFERENCES
Driever, W. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1988). The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent
manner. Cell 54, 95-104.
Driever, W., Thoma, G. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1989). Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila
embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen. Nature 340, 363-7.
Frohnhoefer, H. G. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1986). Organization of anterior patter in the Drosophila embryo by the maternal gene bicoid.
Nature 324, 120-125.
Niessing, D., Dostatni, N., Jäckle, H. and Rivera-Pomar, R. (1999). Sequence interval within the PEST motif of Bicoid is important for
translational repression of caudal mRNA in the anterior region of the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 18, 1966-1973.
Rivera-Pomar, R., Lu, X., Perrimon, N., Taubert, H. and Jäckle, H. (1995). Activation of posterior gap gene expression in the Drosophila
blastoderm. Nature 376, 254-256.
Schaeffer, V., Killian, D., Desplan, C., and Wimmer, E. A. (2000). High Bicoid levels render the terminal system dispensable for Drosophila
head development. Development 127, 3993-3999.