* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download COMPARATIVE MODELING AND MOLECULAR
Citric acid cycle wikipedia , lookup
Amino acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Evolution of metal ions in biological systems wikipedia , lookup
Drug design wikipedia , lookup
G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup
Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides wikipedia , lookup
Multi-state modeling of biomolecules wikipedia , lookup
Oxidative phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup
Genetic code wikipedia , lookup
Biosynthesis wikipedia , lookup
Adenosine triphosphate wikipedia , lookup
Expression vector wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Magnesium transporter wikipedia , lookup
Protein purification wikipedia , lookup
Interactome wikipedia , lookup
Ancestral sequence reconstruction wikipedia , lookup
Structural alignment wikipedia , lookup
Western blot wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Metalloprotein wikipedia , lookup
Anthrax toxin wikipedia , lookup
Proteolysis wikipedia , lookup
COMPARATIVE MODELING AND MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION STUDY OF MAMMALIAN ASPARTYLASPARTYL-tRNA SYNTHETASES Waqasuddin Khan, Rabia Sattar and Zaheer-ul-Haq Dr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, International Center for Chemical & Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Pakistan. Email: [email protected] RESULTS & DISCUSSION ABSTRACT COMPUTATIONAL METHODS The Aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) belonging to the ligase family of enzymes has an important role not only in the protein fidelity by specifically recognizing its cognate amino acid but also in the aminoacylation of tRNAAsp. Several crystal structures of AspRS have been determined. None of these structures is mammalian and yet there in no structural information available about mammalian AspRS. The recognition of homology between protein sequences provides valuable information about the biological behavior and biochemical function of uncharacterized sequences. The homology modeling was done by using yeast AspRS-tRNAAsp-ATP complex structure as our template. The resultant models have excellent stereochemistry and a C-alpha trace similar to the crystal structure. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were also performed to study the conformational changes in the active site when an ATP molecule resides in the AspRS to accomplish the first aminoacylation step. MD simulations reproduced some of the key hydrogen bonds observed crystal structure. The rmsf graphs show most movements in the catalytic site and in the flipping loop region while the main secondary structure maintained the fairly stable conformations. The homology modeling was performed by SYBYL® (version 7.3). Validation of protein structures was determined by PROCHECK, VERIFY3D and ERRATA. Molecular dynamics simulations (MD) was performed by AMBER and trajectory analayis was studied by Ptraj command. INTRODUCTION Different catalytic strategies adapted by enzymes make proteins all-rounder. One such enzyme is “Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases”, whose commitment to genetic translation is interesting to explore. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) constitute a family of cytosolic enzymes of class ligases that play a vital role in protein biosynthesis. The organization of aaRSs in mammalian cells as a supramolecular assemblage may reveal the evolutionary pressure on the organization of protein biosynthetic machinery. This ubiquitous assemblage consists of 11 polypeptide subunits. This complex comprises 9 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases particular for their corresponding amino acid of class I and class II tRNA synthetases, that are monomers (IleRS, LeuRS, MetRS, GlnRS, ArgRS) and dimmers (LysRS, AspRS), and a bifunctional polypeptide (GluProRS), which recently was found out to exist as fusion protein (and three auxiliary proteins of 18, 38 and 43kDa.The aspartate system offers a comprehensive explanation of the diverse states that exists for an aminoacylation system of class II synthetases. The Yeast Aspartyl-tRNA synthetase is a homodimeric protein enzyme (one monomer = 557 amino acids) with a molecular weight range of 125 kDa. Elucidation of structural determinants of ATP binding specificity is very crucial to gain the structure-function relationship. As currently no structure data are available for mammalian aspartyl tRNA synthetase (AspRS), this work reveals the homology modeling and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation study of Homo sapiens and Mus musculus AspRSs. In the order to understand the mechanism of ATP-induced conformational changes, we used the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation method. Analysis at different time frames revealed the persistence of motions in flipping loop region (203-209) in both species during ATP-binding. SYBYL uses Biopolymer module operated by FUGUE method to find similarity between a target sequence and the sequence of proteins of known structures Biopolymer works with ORCHESTRAR suite of applications which is specifically designed for homology protein modeling Fig.2: From left to right; Cartoon representation of yeast AspRS, Homo sapiens AspRS and Mus musculus AspRS showing the domain architecture. Fig.6: RMSF for each C-alpha atoms of Homo sapiens AspRS (Black line) and Mus musculus AspRS (Red line). The highly mobile flipping loop, the hinge region and some other important regions are highlighted. We are interested in the flipping loop region and to some extent to hinge region which accounts for the twisting of or The geometrical and structural consistencies of both the modeled proteins were evaluated by the Procheck program noticeably flexibility of both domain. Further minimizations and MD simulations were performed to study the interacting active site residues using the AMBER suite of programs Fig. 3: C‐alpha based superimposition of the template and target models. The red, yellow and blue ribbon representations show the yeast, Homo sapiens STEREOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF MODELED PROTEINS and Mus musculus AspRSs, respectively. From left to right; motif 1, motif 2 and motif 3. Fig.7 Fig.7: Variations of the gyration radii for the different systems: Homo sapiens AspRS (Black line) and Mus musculus (Red line). CONCLUSION Fig.4: Flipping loop movement deviation between the 1EOV (open state‐red ribbon) and the two predicted 3D models of AspRSs (closed state‐ yellow; Homo sapiens, blue; Mus musculus). The amino acid residues having the CPK representation show conserved substitution. MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT Fig.5: Active site of the mammalian AspRSs showing the class II specific key amino acid residues with its bound substrate ATP. The ATP is shown in ball and stick model. The amino acid residues (represented as their color IDs) are involved in the substrate positioning. In silico-developed homology protein structure modeling builds a threedimensional model of a given protein sequence based on its similarity to one or more known structures belonging to the same member of a protein family. The purpose of this study is strongly related to a drug discovery strategy against yeast AspRS to cease the uncontrolled growth of yeast causing infections. Candida, a genus of yeast, of which Candida albicans is the most occurring species, is responsible for Candidiases. Candidiases includes a wide range of yeast infections, including mycosis. Recently, the probable sequence of candida albicans AspRS is revealed. This sequence has 69% with another yeast species, Saccharomyces cerevisiae AspRS, the only protein molecule with its x-ray determined 3D crystal structure. This 3D AspRS was used as a template to guide the exploration of our homolog models. Since the sequence identity in both yeast AspRSs is high, it would be a better opportunity for us to take 1ASZ as our template. In order to develop a drug targeting yeast AspRS against yeast infections, likeness between eukaryotic AspRSs creates a problem to drug discovery. Drug should be well enough conformationally intelligent that it would be able to identify its true target rather than inhibiting the host system. So, the predicted drug could be well enough to discriminate between these two closely related protein molecules. Fig.1 : From top to bottom; Compatibility score of verify3D of Homo sapiens AspRS and Mus musculus : From top to bottom; Compatibility score of verify3D of Homo sapiens AspRS and Mus musculus AspRS, and errata error value plot of Homo sapiens AspRS and Mus musculus AspRS. ATP contacts Regions AspRS Homo sapiens AspRS Mus musculus 1ASZ (Template) % of residues in most favored regions 83.5 85.2 91.0 % residues in most additional allowed regions 13.9 12.8 8.3 % of residues in generously allowed regions 1.2 0.5 0.7 % of residues in disallowed regions 1.4 1.4 0.0 Table 1. Results of PROCHECK of evaluation by Modeled Protein Structures ATP ATP ATP ATP ATP ATP Protein contacts OP2 α N1 N6 O3’ O3’ O2’ Arg273 Leu283 Leu283 Ile425 Gly472 Arg475 Nη 1 NH CO CO NH Nη 1 Donor-acceptor distances (Predicted this work) Homo sapiens Mus musculus AspRS AspRS 2.64 2.21 3.39 3.38 2.72 2.52 2.74 1.82 3.68 3.65 2.55 2.30 Predicted (Ruff et al., 1994) 2.64 3.34 2.83 2.73 3.80 2.77 Accuracy (%)* Homo sapiens Mus musculus AspRS AspRS 100 84 98.5 100 96 89 100 66.6 97 96.0 92 83.0 REFERENCES •Cavarelli, J., Rees, B., Eriani, G., Ruff, M., Boeglin, M., Gangloff, J., Thierry, J. C. and Moras, D. (1994) EMBO. J., 13, 327-337. •Fiser, A. and Sali, A. (2002) Methods Enzymol., Ref Type: Journal (Full). ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We are greatly thankful to AMBER supporting team for providing AMBER suite of applications. Table 2. ATP‐Homo sapiens AspRS Interatomic Distances (Hydrogen bonding‐Å) 11th International Symposium on Natural Product Chemistry on 29th October-01st November 2008