* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download titles and abstracts
Identical particles wikipedia , lookup
Quantum chromodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Basil Hiley wikipedia , lookup
Delayed choice quantum eraser wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Quantum decoherence wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum dot wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Bell test experiments wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Topological quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum fiction wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup
Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup
Quantum group wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Quantum cognition wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Charis Anastopoulos (University of Patras, Greece) Title: Relativistic quantum measurements and tunneling Abstract: The time it takes a particle to tunnel through a classically forbidden potential barrier has been debated ever since the early years of quantum theory. The debate involves two distinct but interconnected problems: (i) there is no unambiguous definition of tunneling time compatible with the rules of standard quantum theory, and (ii) most definitions of tunneling time seem to imply that particles may cross the barrier at vanishingly short times, thus implying the possibility of super-luminal speeds. We address this issue within a new framework for relativistic quantum measurements that treats the spacetime coordinates of events as random variables. Our approach leads to a precise definition of tunneling times, valid also for relativistic systems, and to an explicit quantitative description of the mechanism through which quantum field theory enforces causality in quantum tunneling. Daniel Bedingham (Imperial College, UK) Title: Relativity and collapse models Abstract: I will review some recent developments toward understanding how to formulate a collapse model that is consistent with relativity. In collapse models it is supposed that quantum state reduction is a genuine physical process, not just something we do when we make a measurement. The task is to come up with some general equations for the wavefunction evolution which would approximate well to either the Schrödinger equation or quantum state reduction in situations where one of those descriptions is more appropriate. The most famous example of this approach is the non-relativistic GRW or Spontaneous localization model. I will give an introduction to the GRW model before discussing some conceptual and technical issues to do with introducing relativity and outlining a proposal for a relativistic collapse model. David-Edward Bruschi (University of Leeds, UK) Title: Towards relativistic quantum technologies Abstract: In the past few years, the field of Relativistic Quantum Information has gained attention from the scientific community. Research in the field is aimed towards understanding how gravity and relativity affect entanglement and quantum information tasks. Recently, attention was given towards the possible implementations of the predictions of the theory in experimental settings. We discuss the role of localized devices and their ability to store, extract and manipulate entanglement of global or local fields. We discuss future directions and applications. Theodosios Christodoulakis (University of Athens, Greece) Title: Canonical quantization of constrained Lagrangians and conditional Symmetries Abstract: A conditional symmetry is defined, in the phase-space of a quadratic in velocities constrained action, as a simultaneous conformal symmetry of the supermetric and the superpotential. It is proven that such a symmetry corresponds to a variational (Noether) symmetry. The use of these symmetries as quantum conditions on the wave-function entails a kind of selection rule. As an example, the minisuperspace model ensuing from a reduction of the Einstein - Hilbert action by considering static, spherically symmetric configurations and r as the independent dynamical variable, is canonically quantized. The conditional symmetries of this reduced action are used as supplementary conditions on the wave function. Their integrability conditions dictate, at a rst stage, that only one of the three existing symmetries can be consistently imposed. At a second stage one is led to the unique Casimir invariant, which is the product of the remaining two, as the only possible second condition on Psi. The uniqueness of the dynamical evolution implies the need to identify this quadratic integral of motion to the reparametrisation generator. This can be achieved by fixing a suitable parametrization of the r-lapse function, exploiting the freedom to arbitrarily rescale it. In this particular parametrization the measure is chosen to be the determinant of the supermetric. The solutions to the combined Wheeler - DeWitt and linear conditional symmetry equations are found and seen to depend on the product of the two "scale factors". Lajos Diosi (Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungary) Title: Relativistic formulation of multiple localized quantum measurements Abstract: I consider von Neumann detectors coupled locally to quantized relativistic fields. The joint outcome statistics of the detectors can be expressed in explicit relativistically invariant form based on standard field theory concepts like, e.g., time-ordering of the local fields. Relevance for certain dynamic collapse models is briefly mentioned. Juliusz Doboszewski (Jagiellonian University, Poland) Title: Entanglement swapping and retrocausation Abstract: We begin with Peres' [1999] thought experiment and its experimental realisation by Ma et al. [2012]. According to the experiment, it is possible to produce entanglement between two particles after their polarisation had been measured. This may give rise to the curious view that quantum mechanics implies retrocausation. In Ma et al. words, "there is never a paradox if the quantum state is viewed as to be no more than a 'catalogue of our knowledge'", in other words, if the quantum state is to be interpreted statistically. But another recent result by Pusey, Barrett & Rudolph [2012] forbids the statistical interpretation. What, then, are quantum states if we take both of these into account? We note first that (1) this causes serious problems for various proposed in the literature theories, including branching space-times theory, and that (2) more generally, cobordism in relativistic spacetimes cannot be exploited to make sense of quantum states. Then we argue that even under ontic interpretation of quantum states, if there is a retrocausation to be found in the experiment of Ma et al., it is of very different nature comparing to the retrocausation considered in the literature either about Bell inequalities (de Bauregard, Price) or in the closed time-like curves Fay Dowker (Imperial College, UK) Title: Dirac’s fork in the road: Spacetime or Hilbert space as the seat for reality? Astract: In 1932 Dirac identified a "fork in the road" for the foundations of quantum mechanics. Dirac stated that the lagrangian approach to classical mechanics was probably more fundamental than the hamiltonian approach because the former is relativistically invariant whereas the latter is "essentially nonrelativistic". Choosing the hamiltonian approach leads in quantum theory to canonincal quantisation, Hilbert space, operators and the textbook rules for state vector "collapse", which are all indeed more or less divorced from the spacetime nature of the physical world as revealed by relativity. Taking the "essentially relativistic" lagrangian branch of Dirac's fork however leads to the path integral, as shown by Dirac in 1932 and developed by Feynman. The interpretation of quantum mechanics in a path integral framework is based directly on events in spacetime. I will briefly outline how seeking to extend the path integral from dealing only with "measurement outcome events" to a quantum theory which treats microscopic and macroscopic physics on the same footing leads to a second fork in the road. The choice at this fork is whether ordinary probabilities are fundamental to quantum theory or not. Demetris Ghikas (University of Patras, Greece) Title: Some Applications to Quantum Information using tools derived from Quantum Information Geometry. Abstract: Quantum Information Geometry is a relatively new area of research that offers many geometric tools for the analysis of mathematical problems related to Quantum Information. After a short introduction we present a new metric on the manifold of states which gives a higher bound of error for certain measurements related to the Quantum Estimation Problem. Then we discuss various possibilities of Entaglement Quantification in the framework of Information Geometry. Joe Henson (Imperial College, UK) Title: Separability, holism and Bell’s theorem Abstract: Seperability can be defined in the following way: any statement that can be made about events in a region of space-time is a logical combination of statements about events in any given partition of that region. That is, events in large regions are nothing but combinations of events in smaller regions. It is sometimes claimed in the literature that this principle is an essential assumption of Bell's theorem, being necessary to the defintition of any sensible "locality" principle. I will show that this is not the case, and a proof along the lines of Bell's in "theory of local beables" does not rely on seperability. I will argue that there is no evidence that Bell or Einstein intended seperability to be at the heart of their arguments on locality, causality and the completeness of QM. Finally I will draw some wider conclusions about what constitutes a "plausible response to Bell's theorem", arguing in particular that it is futile to attack the significance of the theorem on the grounds that Bell's local causality does not correctly embody "lack of superluminal influence Beatrix Hiesmayr (University of Vienna, Austria) Title: Entanglement, Relativistic Observers and Bell inequalities Abstract: We analyze how entanglement of spin ½ particles changes for a boosted observer [1]. We show that the change of entanglement arises, because a Lorentz boost on the momenta of the particles causes a Wigner rotation of the spin, which in certain cases entangles the spin with the momentum states. We systematically investigate the situation for different classes of initial spin states and different partitions of the four-qubit space. Furthermore, we study the behaviour of Bell inequalities for different observers and demonstrate how the maximally possible degree of violation, using the Pauli-Lubanski spin observable, can be recovered by any inertial observer. Finding a meaningful classification of multipartite entanglement is a highly discussed topic. In Ref.[2] we investigated which general conditions have to be met for any classification of multipartite entanglement to be Lorentz invariant. This contributes to a physical understanding of entanglement classification. We show that quantum information in a relativistic setting requires the partition of the Hilbert space into particles to be taken seriously. Furthermore, we study exemplary cases and show how the spin and momentum entanglement transforms relativistically in a multipartite setting. [1] N. Friis, R.A. Bertlmann, M. Huber, B.C. Hiesmayr Phys. Rev. A 81, 042114 (2010) [2] M. Huber, N. Friis, A. Gabriel, Ch. Spengler and B.C. Hiesmayr EPL 95, Number 2, 20002 (2011) Juan Leon (Instituto de Fisica Fundamental, Spain) Title: Alice passes through a pinhole Abstract: The emergence of an elementary system through an aperture is a seemingly innocent phenomenon full of contradictions and apparently at clash with the demands of locality. I shall use this case to separate mechanical localization (if it is not here, it is zero) from field localization (if it is not here, there is the vacuum). The goal is to give an understanding of the possibilities and limits to "putting a qubit somewhere" in spacetime. Georgios Linardopoulos (National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Greece) Title: Rotating Strings and Membranes in AdS/CFT Abstract: We shall introduce the concept of Gauge/Gravity duality and present some of its realizations as a correspondence between a quantum theory of gravity and a gauge (quantum field) theory. The role of classical, bosonic rotating strings and membranes, in studying the structure of the correspondence, will be stressed. Nikolaos Pappas (University of Ioannina, Greece) Title: On the preservation of unitarity during black hole’s evolution and information extraction from its interior Abstract: For more than 30 years the discovery that black holes radiate like black bodies of specific temperature has triggered a multitude of puzzling questions concerning their nature and the fate of information that goes down the black hole during its lifetime. The most tricky issue in what is known as information loss paradox is the apparent violation of unitarity during the formation/evaporation process of black holes. A new idea is proposed based on the combination of our knowledge on Hawking radiation as well as the Einstein-PodolskyRosen phenomenon, that could resolve the paradox and spare physicists from the unpalatable idea that unitarity can ultimately be irreversibly violated even under special conditions. Stefano Pironio (Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium) Title: Quantum non-locality based on finite-speed causal influences leads to superluminal signaling Abstract: The experimental violation of Bell inequalities using spacelike separated measurements precludes the explanation of quantum correlations through causal influences propagating at subluminal speed. Yet, the Bell violations observed in such experiments could always be explained in principle through models based on hidden influences propagating at a finite speed v>c, provided v is large enough. Here, we show that for any finite speed v>c, such models predict correlations that can be exploited for fasterthan-light communication. This superluminal communication does not require access to any hidden physical quantities, but only the manipulation of measurement devices at the level of our present-day description of quantum experiments. Hence, assuming the impossibility of using nonlocal correlations for superluminal communication, we exclude any possible explanation of quantum correlations in terms of influences propagating at any finite speed. Our result uncovers a new aspect of the complex relationship between multipartite quantum nonlocality and the impossibility of signaling and illustrates the difficulty to modify quantum physics while maintaining no-signaling. Rafael Sorkin (Perimeter Institute, Canada) Title: Does a quantum particle know its own energy? Abstract: If a wave function does not describe microscopic reality then what does? Reformulating quantum mechanics in path-integral terms leads to a notion of "precluded event" and thence to the proposal that quantal reality differs from classical reality in the same way as a set of worldlines differs from a single worldline. One can then ask, for example, which sets of electron trajectories correspond to a Hydrogen atom in its ground state and how they differ from those of an excited state. I will answer the analogous questions for simple model that replaces the electron by a particle hopping (in discrete steps) on a circular lattice. Ward Struyve (University of Leuven, Belgium) Title: Semi-classical gravity based on de Broglie-Bohm theory Abstract: Semi-classical approximations to quantum theory describe part of the system classically and part quantum mechanically. In the usual approach, one considers the classical system to move under a mean force, obtained by averaging over the quantum system. We consider an alternative approach based on de Broglie-Bohm theory. This approach has shown to yield better results than the mean force approach for certain non-relativistic systems by e.g. Prezhdo and Brooksby, and Gindensperger et al. We present such semiclassical approximations for quantum electrodynamics and quantum gravity. Petros Wallden (University of Athens & TEI of Chalkida, Greece) Title: Interpreting the Quantum Measure Abstract: Taking Feynman’s view on quantum mechanics, we use histories of the system and assign to them quantum amplitudes. To recover probabilities, one sums over paths and takes the mod square of that. Generalizing this view, we can define a quantum measure on the space of all histories. However, this is not a proper measure and cannot be interpreted as such. In this talk we first stress the differences between classical and quantum measure and why we cannot maintain the classical view (as opposed for example in Bohm’s theory). Furthermore we mention how the quantum measure can be interpreted, either in the context of consistent histories or in view of the co-event’s formulation which we focus in this talk. Silke Weinfurtner (SISSA, Italy) Title: Spacetime from bits Abstract: I introduce a binary description for discrete gravity in 1+1 dimensions, focusing on a particular variant thereof known as causal dynamical triangulations, resting entirely on binary variables. Furthermore I present an ergodic binary encoding of spacetime manifolds, and lay out all the necessary steps to evaluate the path integral of discrete gravity directly from the bits, i.e. the natural language of information processing. Although in 1+1 dimensions the continuum limit of causal dynamical triangulation, i.e. the procedure to emergence a smooth manifold from the discrete, is well understood, our approach maps discrete gravity directly to physical systems. Furthermore, the results presented here give rise to a quantum description of spacetime, by replacing bits with two-state quantummechanical systems. The possibility to express causal dynamical triangulations in terms of atomic spins hints at the existence of real-life analogue discrete gravity systems. James Yearsly (University of Cambridge, UK) Title: Pitfalls of path integrals: amplitudes for spacetime regions and the quantum Zeno effect Abstract: Path integrals appear to offer natural and intuitively appealing methods for defining quantum-mechanical amplitudes for questions involving spacetime regions. For example, the amplitude for entering a spatial region during a given (large) time interval is typically defined by summing over all paths between given initial and final points but restricting them to pass through the region at any time. Such amplitudes play a key role in consistent histories and quantum measure theory. I will argue that there is, however, under very general conditions, a significant complication in such constructions. This is the fact that the concrete implementation of the restrictions on paths over a range of times corresponds, in an operator language, to sharp monitoring at every moment of time in the given time interval. Such monitoring processes suffer from the quantum Zeno effect, in which continual monitoring of a quantum system in a Hilbert subspace prevents it from leaving that subspace. As a consequence, path integral amplitudes defined in this seemingly obvious way have physically and intuitively unreasonable properties and in particular, no sensible classical limit. I will describe this frequently-occurring but little-appreciated phenomenon in some detail, showing clearly the connection with the quantum Zeno effect. I will then show that it may be avoided by implementing the restriction on paths in the path integral in a “softer” way. The resulting amplitudes then involve a new coarse graining parameter, which may be taken to be a timescale describing the softening of the restrictions on the paths. Roman Zapatrin (The State Russian Museum, Russia) Title: Quantum Contextuality and non-Bayesian Knowledge Revision Abstract: In general, non-classical correlations (whose manifestation is the failure of Bayesian law) appear when Kolmogorovian probability model is no longer applicable. In nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics the structure of events form an orthomodular lattice, this gives rise to quantum correlations. Recent developments in Computer Science discovered the existence of stronger-than-quantum correlations in the area of information retrieval. In order to quantify the bias from classical or quantum correlations I suggest to interpret them as contextuality and to measure them in terms of the declination from Kochen-Specker inequalities. Andreas Zoupas (University of Thessaly, Greece) Title: Effective Equations of Motion, Decoherence, and Backreaction Abstract: We analyze the behavior of the density operator propagator for the following class of systems: two particles coupled to each other and one of them coupled to a thermal bath of harmonic oscillators. Focusing on the dynamics of the particle which is coupled to the environment we wish to study its dynamics under the influence of both the environment and the other particle. We test the following hypothesis: the environment, via the environment induced decoherence mechanism, leads to classical behavior of the particle it couples to, called classical particle from now on, while the other particle, called quantum system from now on, does not retain its quantum nature due to its coupling with classical particle. Thus, such systems, may be used as toy models for real measuring devices. We may then study, first whether the classical particle really induces decoherence to the quantum one, and second what is the effect, of such a coupling, on the equations of motions of the classical system. This is an attempt to derive from first principles the backreaction of quantum degrees of freedom to classical ones. We may then attempt to formulate general rules for the so called effective classical equations of motion. The main result of this work, so far, is that even in the presence of an environment the combined classical and quantum system results in a quantum entangled state. This is an explicit result showing that decoherence cannot solve the measurement problem. It questions both the role of decoherence in emergent classicality and the model used to study it.