* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download CDP Cities 2016 Guidance for responding city governments Version
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Emissions trading wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Kyoto Protocol and government action wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in New Zealand wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
CDP Cities 2016 Guidance for responding city governments Version 1.2 Current as of February 16th, 2016 Page 1 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Table of Contents CDP Cities Overview .......................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction to CDP ......................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction to CDP’s cities program ............................................................................................... 4 The CDP Cities 2016 Information Request ...................................................................................... 4 Compact of Mayors ......................................................................................................................... 5 Timeline for Responses and Analysis .............................................................................................. 5 Feedback ........................................................................................................................................ 6 How to Respond .............................................................................................................................. 6 Response Check ............................................................................................................................. 7 Terms and Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 7 Response Changes ......................................................................................................................... 7 Further Information Fields ............................................................................................................... 8 Copy From Last Year ...................................................................................................................... 8 Save Function ................................................................................................................................. 8 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 10 General Guidance ......................................................................................................................... 10 Specific Question Guidance .......................................................................................................... 10 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 10 Governance ...................................................................................................................................... 12 General Guidance ......................................................................................................................... 12 Specific Question Guidance .......................................................................................................... 12 City Details .................................................................................................................................... 12 Governance................................................................................................................................... 14 Risks & Adaptation............................................................................................................................ 15 General Guidance ......................................................................................................................... 15 Specific Question Guidance .......................................................................................................... 16 Adaptation ..................................................................................................................................... 27 Social Risks................................................................................................................................... 31 Opportunities .................................................................................................................................... 33 General Guidance ......................................................................................................................... 33 Specific Question Guidance .......................................................................................................... 33 Opportunities ................................................................................................................................. 33 Emissions – Local Government Operations ...................................................................................... 35 Page 2 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net General Guidance ......................................................................................................................... 35 Specific Question Guidance .......................................................................................................... 37 Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 37 Energy data ................................................................................................................................... 39 GHG Emissions Data .................................................................................................................... 40 External Verification ...................................................................................................................... 43 Emissions - Community .................................................................................................................... 45 General Guidance ......................................................................................................................... 45 Specific Question Guidance .......................................................................................................... 46 Date and Boundary ....................................................................................................................... 46 Emissions and Energy data ........................................................................................................... 46 External verification ....................................................................................................................... 52 Strategy ............................................................................................................................................ 53 General Guidance ......................................................................................................................... 53 Specific Question Guidance .......................................................................................................... 53 GHG Emission Reduction – Local Government Operations ........................................................... 53 GHG Emission Reduction – Community ........................................................................................ 56 Renewable Energy ........................................................................................................................ 60 Water Supply Risks ....................................................................................................................... 64 Water Supply Management ........................................................................................................... 65 Compact of Mayors ........................................................................................................................... 67 Appendix 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 68 Glossary ........................................................................................................................................ 68 Appendix 2 ........................................................................................................................................ 75 Fuel Definitions.............................................................................................................................. 75 Appendix 3 ........................................................................................................................................ 80 Conversion of Electricity, Heat, Steam and Cooling data to MWh .................................................. 80 Conversion of fuel data to MWh .................................................................................................... 80 Appendix 4 ........................................................................................................................................ 86 Resources and Reports ................................................................................................................. 86 Appendix 5 ........................................................................................................................................ 87 Page 3 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net CDP Cities Overview Introduction to CDP CDP is a not-for-profit organization working to create lasting relationships between various stakeholders regarding the commercial and non-commercial implications of climate change. CDP’s mission is to transform the global economic system to prevent dangerous climate change and value our natural resources by putting relevant information at the heart of business, investment and policy decisions. This document provides guidance to assist all cities completing the CDP Cities 2016 Information Request. If you have not completed a CDP Information Request before or you would like to know more about how others respond, please refer to the CDP website, where you can view responses to the CDP Cities 2015 Information Request as well as to other CDP programs (CDP Climate Change, CDP Water Disclosure, CDP Forests, and CDP Supply Chain), and learn more about CDP’s operations. Introduction to CDP’s cities program CDP offers a voluntary climate change reporting platform for city governments. The program provides the world’s first global platform for municipal governments to disclose greenhouse gas emissions, climate change risks, and mitigation and adaptation strategies. CDP collects and delivers materially relevant data for cities, the private sector, and other stakeholders. The Can Cities Quit Fossil Fuels? report on 308 global cities shows the role cities play in driving the transition to clean energy and is based on data reported to CDP by cities in 2015. CDP has developed the cities program to extend to cities some of the same benefits that companies have experienced over the last ten years of participating in CDP. Like companies, cities play a key role in the global economy and can play an important role as drivers of solutions to climate change. In fact, many city governments are already leading the way on greenhouse gas reduction and adaptation to warmer temperatures. While city governments and public companies are vastly different in size, scope and structure, the annual disclosure cycle CDP can offer is an important impetus for cities to measure and report their climate change related information. CDP’s experience shows that the public disclosure of climate change data can have significant benefits for disclosing organizations. The CDP Cities 2016 Information Request The CDP Cities 2016 Information Request is composed of a series of sections. Each section asks questions about an aspect of your city including; GHG emissions, risks and opportunities from climate change, and strategies for mitigating emissions, and strategies for adapting to changes in the climate. The CDP Cities Information Request allows your city to report two separate but parallel greenhouse gas inventories: one for your local government’s operations, and one for your community as a whole. The differentiation between government (sometimes called “corporate” or “municipality”) emissions and community (sometimes called “geographic” or “city-wide”) emissions recognizes that while governments can influence emissions and develop resilience in their broader community through Page 4 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net demonstrated leadership, policies and regulations, as well as strategies and programs, sometimes they can only make changes to the facilities and operations under their direct control. As such, separate but parallel inventories are needed. As a responding city you have the opportunity to report one, both or neither of these emissions inventories depending on the data they have available. The information generated from this request will assist in improving the understanding of urban GHG emissions. It provides a framework for the development/enhancement of GHG inventories ensuring that emissions are reported in a meaningful way. It can highlight potential risks and opportunities arising from climate change, promote consideration of adaptation and resilience building activities and facilitate target setting. Overall it will enhance the understanding of how local governments and other stakeholders are dealing with the challenge of climate change. Compact of Mayors The Compact of Mayors (CoM) is the largest cooperative international effort among mayors and city officials to demonstrate their commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and preparing for the impacts of climate change. To be compliant with the Compact of Mayors, cities shall report annually on progress towards achieving GHG emissions reduction targets, using the Global Protocol for Community-scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and assessing climate hazards, using standards established through City Networks. The questions issued by the Compact of Mayors are integrated into the CDP questionnaire. Within this questionnaire they appear in blue text so that they are easy to find. To participate in the Compact of Mayors simply complete the CDP questionnaire and give close attention to the questions in blue text. To save you time, the responses to the questions that appear in blue will be available for automatic import to the Compact of Mayors module by clicking “Copy from last year’ at the bottom of the pages in the Compact of Mayors module. This will automatically import the responses you have given to this year’s questionnaire into the Compact of Mayors module. More information on this functionally is explained below in the Copy from last year section. In addition, your city must complete this letter and attach it to your response in question M0.1 in the Compact of Mayors module. Additional guidance on the Compact of Mayors module is available. Timeline for Responses and Analysis The timeline for CDP Cities 2015/16 is as follows: December 2015 CDP will send a letter of invitation to the leaders (e.g. the mayor) of each of city. CDP will also publish an electronic copy of the Information Request on its website. January 2016 CDP Cities Online Response System (ORS) becomes operational for responding cities. 18 March 2016 ‘Response check’ eligibility deadline 29 April 2016 Submission deadline July-August 2016 CDP consultation period for amendments to the information request. September 2016 CDP's cities program findings launched around the globe Page 5 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Feedback Each participating city receives feedback on their response reflecting their performance on the different sections of the questionnaire. The aim of this tool is to help your city identify areas of improvement and to drive climate change actions in cities. This personalized report is delivered privately and the feedback methodology used can be consulted on the CDP website. How to Respond Cities are asked to respond to the Information Request using the Online Response System (ORS). If you are unable to respond via the ORS, please email [email protected] to open a discussion about the best means for you to submit your questionnaire. Please provide all relevant information in your answer in the format requested by the ORS. A short, direct answer is better than a long response with additional information not relevant to the question. Answers should be as specific as possible to your city. To access the ORS, your city first has to register for the year’s disclosing cycle through the CDP Portal. The registration process is as follows: The first member of your city to register for the disclosing cycle of a given year will be the CDP “registered user” for that year. Other users will be able to introduce and save data into the ORS, but only the registered user will be able to submit the data to CDP once the request is complete. As the registered user you can send an invitation to have one of your colleagues help you with the response simply by clicking Add users on the respond page. Please note that only one user at a time can enter data in the system. If you have any questions about this setup, or if you want to change the “registered user” for your city, please email [email protected]; Your portal contains a Questionnaire block with a “Start” button which allows you to access the CDP Cities 2016 questionnaire. Click on this tab to access and begin filling in your Information Request. Please note this step may take some time while the questionnaire is being built by the system; The ORS will load in a new window. Please ensure that you are using Microsoft Internet Explorer as your browser and that you have turned off the pop-up blocker; and The first page of the ORS is an introduction page. This page holds necessary fields including choice of reporting boundary (government operations, community, both, or neither). Once you save your choices on this Introduction page, the rest of the questionnaire will automatically render itself. Note that for certain questions, there will be text limits in the ORS. Answers requiring text answers will be limited to 5,000 characters, or roughly one page of text. Text fields in tables will limit responses to 2,400 characters. Numeric field entries are to be numbers only, without commas or periods, and numbers should be between 0 and 99999999999. Page 6 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Public or Private Response Prior to submitting your response, you will be provided with the option to make your answers available to the public or keep them private, meaning they are only viewable by CDP staff and other selected partners. To make your answers public, ensure that a check is present in the box next to the word “Public”. To keep your answer private, ensure that a check is NOT present in the box next to where the word “Public” appears. A public response: A private response: Response Check Response check is a free service offered to improve data quality. The completed response will be checked for completeness and continuity. We will work with you to complete the entire questionnaire and highlight areas where responses may have been put in the wrong question box. This service is only available to cities who complete their response by the early deadline 18 March 2016. For more information please contact us at [email protected]. Terms and Conditions In order to submit your questionnaire, you must read and agree to the Terms and Conditions. Read the terms and conditions by clicking on the link named “T&C” on the ORS Home page; the terms will appear in a new window. When you are finished reading, place a check in the tick box next to the “T&C” link to denote that you have read and agree to the terms and conditions. You cannot submit a response before having accepted the Terms and Conditions. Response Changes When responses are submitted via the ORS, they will become “read-only” after submission and can only be amended by CDP staff. CDP can accept revisions to responses in writing at any time and will aim to make these available on the CDP website within acceptable timeframes. All revisions must be submitted before the 29 April 2016 to be included in the report. To submit revisions to your response, please email [email protected]. Page 7 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Further Information Fields Your city will have the ability to provide additional information beyond the question requests in the “Further Information” fields. Please do not use these fields for providing your actual answer. Any information included in the “Further Information” box will not be used for analysis purposes nor will it be taken into consideration for the feedback. However, it will be available for other cities through the CDP website. Copy From Last Year If your city participated in the CDP Cities 2015 Information Request, you will benefit from a Copy from last year function. If you click on the Copy from last year button at the bottom of the page, your previous year’s response to some questions will be copied into this year’s response. Please note that the functionality only works on questions which have not had major changes since last year. This function will only work if it is clicked on each page before the save function and will copy all of the responses provided to CDP Cities in the year prior. Copy from last year operates differently in the Compact of Mayors module. Rather than copying the answers from the 2014 Information request, Copy from last year copies your answers from the Compact of Mayors questions of the CDP questionnaire (questions in blue font) and pastes them into the Compact of Mayors module questions. Copy from last year will save you from filling in the same question twice. Save Function Within the ORS, there is a save function. As you navigate between pages, your information will be saved regardless of whether you press the “Save” button. That said, if you happen to lose your internet connection any information on the current page that has not been saved will be lost. Users are encouraged to save regularly to avoid the loss of information. Page 8 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Acknowledgements CDP would like to thank the following people and organizations for their assistance in developing the CDP Cities 2016 Information Request and guidance documents. Michael Doust, C40 Kerem Yilmaz, C40 Katie Vines, C40 Seth Schultz, C40 Hanya Gartner, C40 Jonathan Wachtel, Lakewood Chris Menges, Aspen Joao Dinis, Cascais Javier Castaño, Madrid Guri Tajet, Oslo Monica Abril, Quito Yann Françoise, Paris Koldo Verheij, Rotterdam João Resch Leal, Salvador Lisa Lin, Houston Dr. Jairo Garcia, Atlanta João Pedro Coelho Marques, Barreiro Toh Xiang Hui Jansen, Singapore Israel Jorge Huarca Mejía, Lima Giovanni Fini, Bologna Elyse A. Hottel, Boulder MBOCKSI Jacqueline Elisabeth, Douala João Correia Vargues, Faro Jeffrey Meek, Indianapolis Marco Velotta, Las Vegas Gerardo Garcia Castillo, Monclova Page 9 of 87 Kerina Singh, Pietermaritzburg Luana Gasparini, Ravenna Larry Burkett, Richmond Sindy Nova Perez, Santiago de Cali Wei Zhang, Shenzhen Sergio Lopes, Vila Nova de Famillico Valentina Caroli, Ferrara Fabio Pontes Ferreira, Sao Pedro Cezar Augusto Machado Capacle, Campinas Alfredo Vicente de Castro Trindade, Curitiba Patricia Otero, ITU Gustavo Soares de Araujo, Natal Raquel Goncalves Franca, Palmas Glabuer Zettler Pinheiro, Porto Alegre Flavia Carloni, Rio de Janeiro Vanessa Valente, Sao Bernardo do Campo Gabriel da Cunha Lessa, Sao Goncalo José Vicente Alamino de Moura, Tatui Luiz Roberto de Oliveira, Recife Rosângela Aparecida Martins Nogueira Grigolleto, Vinhedo Patricia Camacho Rodríguez, Mexico City Henry Shiling, Moody's Investors Service Megan Day, NREL Wee Kean Fong, WRI @cdp | www.cdp.net Introduction General Guidance Please answer the questions in the Introduction section for the current year. You will be given a chance later to report specific years for each emissions inventory that you select. Specific Question Guidance Introduction Q 0.1 Please give a general description and introduction to your city including your city’s boundary in the text below. Identify the administrative boundary of your city by selecting the most appropriate response from the following list of values: City / Municipality – a city, town, village or borough, etc. with some degree of general purpose self-governance. Local government area within a city / metropolitan area – a sub-tier of local government responsible for local services not overseen by the executive governing body (e.g., the City of London local authority within the Greater London Authority). Independent city – a city or town that does not form part of another local government entity (e.g., cities within U.S. States that are independent from county-level government such as Baltimore, Maryland or Carson City, Nevada; the German Kreisfreie Stadt or Stadtkreis such as Leipzig and München). Special city – cities or districts with special administrative status as compared to other similar urban areas (e.g., Seoul, South Korea; Kiev, Ukraine; Hong Kong Special administrative region). Federal district – a type of administrative division of a federation under the direct control of a federal government (e.g., Brasilia, Brazil; Washington, District of Columbia, USA; México, Distrito Federal, Mexico). Sovereign city-state – a state consisting of a sovereign city and its dependencies (e.g., Singapore; Vatican City). Metropolitan area – a region consisting of a densely populated urban core and its less-populated surrounding areas (e.g., an urban area closely linked economically and socially, such as a commuting catchment area). County – a geographical region that forms a subnational or substate division of governance that may include a number of cities, town, villages, etc. (e.g., Northumberland, UK). Other area You are also asked to give an introduction to your city. The information provided here will assist CDP in drawing upon distinctions, similarities, and comparative features between cities in terms of their community emissions as well as tools and successes in mitigating and adapting to climate change. Information that could be provided includes: Location, boundaries, geographic characteristics, and natural features Climatic characteristics Demographic characteristics (size of residential and commuter population) Features of the local and regional economy Page 10 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Unique and attractive characteristics Areas of global and/or economic competitiveness Changes in urban form and urban growth over the short to medium term, and projected changes in the coming medium to long term Institutional governance frameworks of the city, and relationship or jurisdictional matters to regional and national governments Emissions Accounting Choice Q 0.2 Please indicate which greenhouse gas measurement inventories you are disclosing. CDP allows cities to report emissions figures for two separate but parallel inventories: Local government operations (sometimes referred to as “corporate” or “municipal”): relating to those emissions arising from the operations of the local government; Community (sometimes referred to as “geographic” or “city-wide”): encompassing emissions which are within a particular geopolitical region, over which local governments can exercise a degree of influence through the policies and regulations they implement. The Government inventory is a subset within the Community inventory. Community emissions are designed to represent the total quantity of GHG emissions produced by your community (as defined by geographic boundaries) and will therefore include Government emissions. You will have the opportunity to describe the methodology or protocol utilized to measure your city’s emissions later in the questionnaire. For more information on the difference between Government and Community emissions inventories, please see the following documents: Local Government Operations Protocol (LGOP) for the Quantification and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (Version 1.1) (a collaboration between The California Air Resources Board, The California Climate Action Registry, The Climate Registry, and ICLEI) International Local Government GHG Emissions Analysis Protocol (IEAP) developed by ICLEI Appendix B in the Global Protocol for Community-scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (WRI, C40 and ICLEI). Select the inventory (or inventories) that you wish to disclose by ticking the adjacent box. Reporting emissions is optional for all cities. The ORS will then create a questionnaire that includes the appropriate emissions module. Please note that if you deselect an Inventory after having entered data in the module for that inventory, the data will be deleted. For each emissions inventory, the module will offer a chance to note the reporting year. IF YOU HAVE NO FUEL AND/OR GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS TO REPORT DO NOT CHECK EITHER BOX. After completing questions 0.1 and 0.2, please click “Save” at the bottom of the page. Page 11 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Governance General Guidance This section provides an opportunity for you to report on the management structure and processes for handling climate change in your city. Specific Question Guidance City Details Q 0.3 Please provide information about your city’s Mayor in the table below: This is a table question which asks for details about your mayor and their time in office. The table provided has the following column headers: Leader title State the official title of your mayor. Leader name State the full name of your mayor. Current term start Choose a year from the list of values to indicate which year your Mayor began their current term. Current term end Choose a year from the list of values to indicate in which year your Mayor’s current term ends. The Mayor’s end of term is defined by the year when elections to select (or continue the current Mayor’s term) a new mayor are scheduled to occur. If there is no scheduled end of term for your Mayor, please select “Other” and indicate: “No scheduled end of term”. Total time in office (years) Provide the total number of years that your city’s leader has been in office. Q 0.4 Please provide details of your city’s annual operating budget. This table question is to identify the amount of funding for your city’s annual operating budget and the time period allocated. The annual operating budget for a city sets out proposed appropriations for a fiscal year to enable the city to function, provide services, and meet financial requirements. The annual budget for a city is typically comprised of several parts including: the expense budget, which sets out proposed appropriations for operating expenditures for municipal services; the capital budget and program, which sets out proposed appropriations for capital projects; and the revenue budget, which sets out the estimated revenues and receipts of the local government. Annual operating budget State your annual operation budget figure as a number. Currency From the list of currencies provided, select the currency of the reported annual operating budget. Budget year start Select the starting date of your budget year. Budget year end Select the closing date of your budget year. Page 12 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Q 0.5 Please provide details of your city’s current and projected population. This question asks about your city’s current population size and how it is forecast to change in the future. Current population Give the current population, the number of residents within your city boundaries [as reported in question 0.1] as a whole number. Current population year From the list of values select the year in which the population figure was determined. Projected population State the projected population of your city as a number. Projected population year Select a year from the list of values in which the projected population figure is estimated to be reached. Q 0.6 Please provide details of your city’s GDP. A city’s gross domestic product (GDP) is defined by the OECD as a measure for “final goods and services produced by a … [city] during a period minus the value of imports”. GDP Provide the most current value available of your city’s gross domestic product in your native currency, or the currency used for calculation. Currency From the list of currencies provided, select the currency of the GDP value reported. Year of GDP From the list of values, select the year when the GDP value you are reporting was calculated. Source State by whom the GDP was calculated. E.g. was it calculated by your city government or did you employ a reference source? Please elaborate on which reference was used, if any. Q 0.7 Please provide further details about the geography of your city. Average annual temperature (in Celsius) State the current average annual temperature as a one decimal figure in °C. Land area State the land area within your city boundaries as a one decimal figure in km2. Please provide the land area that is reflective of your emissions inventory boundary and the year of your reported emissions inventory. Average altitude State the average altitude (elevation above mean average sea level) of your city area as a one decimal figure in meters. Longitude (e.g. -120.9762) State your city’s longitude (of the city’s point of reference or most central point) in degrees 0 to 180 (for all cities east of the prime meridian) or 0 to -180 (for all cities west of the prime meridian). Latitude (e.g. 41.25) State your city’s latitude (of the city’s point of reference or most central point) in degrees 0 to 90 (for all cities north of the equator) or 0 to -90 (for all cities south of the equator). Page 13 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Governance Q 1.0 Please describe the impact of national and/or regional climate change activities on your city’s own climate change activities. Current and/or expected state, regional, national or global governmental policy on climate change may influence your city’s climate change policies. Regulations for instance may inhibit the ability of a city to meet financial targets or to enact locally appropriate programs for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. Or regulations could dictate the emissions reduction targets for your city. The intent of this question is to understand the dynamic between the local government and the regional and/or national government. How are your city’s actions and targets influenced by the national and/ or regional government? Q 1.1 Does your city incorporate desired sustainability goals and targets (e.g. GHG reductions) into the master planning for the city? A master plan describes and maps an overall development concept, including present and future land use, urban design and landscaping, built form, infrastructure, circulation and service provision. It is based upon an understanding of place and it is intended to provide a structured approach to creating a clear and consistent framework for development (definition taken from the Scottish government). Response Please answer by selecting “Yes” or “No” from the drop down menu provided. Description Please describe how your city uses a master plan to reduce GHG emissions. For instance, cities may encourage the use of public transportation by designing transportation hubs so that citizens live within walking distance of a train or bus stop. Q1.2 Please describe how your city collaborates with businesses in your city on sustainability issues or projects. This question aims to understand how cities collaborate with businesses on sustainability issues. Some examples of collaboration can be found in this report. Page 14 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Risks & Adaptation General Guidance This section asks how climate change is affecting your city now and may affect it in the future. Further information regarding climate change adaptation analysis is available from the following sources: UKCIP Adaptation Wizard by UKCIP Handbook on Methods for Climate Change Impact Assessment and Adaptation Strategies by UNEP City Climate Hazard Taxonomy by C40 and ARUP Questions 2.0-2.3 ask about your city’s risk or vulnerability assessment processes. A climate change risk and vulnerability assessment is used to determine the nature and extent of risks posed by climate change. This is done by analyzing potential future climate hazards and evaluating existing vulnerabilities to understand the seriousness of the potential impacts on people, assets, services, livelihoods and the environment. When identifying impacts from climate change, cities should think objectively of the ways in which changes in the climate conditions will affect their city’s ability to conduct business as usual. Information about impacts associated with climate change can be found on the website of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in the report by Working Group II, “Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability” Climate risk assessment considers the likely frequency of a climate hazard and magnitude of their impacts in a given place or population, based on the exposure of assets to the effects of a hazard, and the vulnerability of the population to loss or damage (IPCC, AR5 WGII SPM, 2014; UNISDR, 2012). Information about the Climate Hazards faced by cities and driving their exposure to climate risks is sought in questions 2.1a-2.1d. Climate hazards are defined as dangerous climate-related physical events that may cause loss of life, injury, or other health impacts, as well as damage and loss to property, infrastructure, livelihoods, service provision, ecosystems, and environmental resources. Global climate change is expected to result in changes to local average and extreme conditions, which may affect the frequency, severity or extent of climate hazards. Adaptation is covered in Questions 3.0 to 3.4b. These questions examines the actions your city takes to adapt to the risks of climate change. Social risk should be considered in Question 4.0. Climate change can have profound social effects. The latest IPCC report links physical and social risks of climate change very clearly in chapters 11-13. E.g. droughts may reduce water availability to urban households which reduces hygiene levels and may increase disease burden. Page 15 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Specific Question Guidance Climate Hazards Q 2.0 Has a climate change risk or vulnerability assessment been undertaken for your local government area? Please respond to indicate whether your city has undertaken a climate change risk or vulnerability assessment by selecting the most relevant option from the drop down menu. If you select “Yes” you will be directed to Q 2.0a and Q 2.0b. The effects of climate change my pose a significant risk to your city’s future development. A climate change risk or vulnerability assessment is a qualitative or quantitative scientific estimation the risks from or vulnerability to climate change. These assessments are most usually done within the context of a decision-making or planning process to address climate change impacts. Before developing an adaptation plan, it is important to understand how climate change is likely to affect your city - this is usually done by conducting a climate change risk or vulnerability assessment. A vulnerability assessment is the analysis of the expected impacts, risks and the adaptive capacity of your city to the effects of climate change. Assessing the vulnerability of your city encompasses more than simple measurement of the potential harm caused by events resulting from climate change: it also includes an assessment of the region or sector's ability to adapt, sometimes referred to as ‘adaptive capacity’. In order to complete a vulnerability assessment, a city is likely to need to undertake the following steps: Decide the purpose and scope of your risk of vulnerability assessment Collect relevant data such as o Geographic and political information o Land-use and population demographics o Critical asset location, condition, connections and management o Current and historical climate information Understanding the current and future climate hazards faced by your city requires several steps: Identifying the hazards to which your city is (or has historically been) exposed Assessing the consequence and likelihood of the impact of these hazards on your city based on recent, expert-reviewed estimates where possible Selecting climate change scenarios outlining possible future climate in the city Understanding how the frequency and intensity of climate hazards will change under these scenarios Understanding your city’s exposure and sensitivity to climate hazards, and your capacity to adapt, requires several steps: Assessing previously identified current and future hazard exposure usually under two (or more) climate change scenarios Identifying the city’s critical assets and the relationships between them Identifying likely impacts from current and future hazards on the city’s critical assets Identifying strengths and weaknesses of the city’s adaptive capacity Assessing the vulnerability of the city, based on the combination of the possible impacts of climate change and the city’s adaptive capacity A high quality vulnerability assessment involves engagement with a broad range of stakeholders. It is important to recognize the diverse expertise that different stakeholders provide. It is particularly critical to acknowledge local community and traditional indigenous knowledge and to be aware of different perspectives and values. Broad engagement can result in identification of previously overlooked areas of vulnerability or in a more nuanced understanding of the root cause of vulnerabilities and hence bettertargeted adaptation responses. Page 16 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Q 2.0a If yes: Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk or vulnerability assessment. Publication title Please state the name of your climate change risk or vulnerability assessment. Year of publication Please state the year that your climate change risk or vulnerability assessment was published. Attach the document If a formal assessment of your city’s vulnerabilities to climate change has been done, please attach this document here. Click on ‘Choose file’, navigate to the file you want to upload and click ‘Open’. Once you can see the file name in the text field click ‘Attach’ to attach the document. Boundary of assessment Indicate the boundary of your jurisdiction’s risk or vulnerability assessment by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values: City / Municipality – a city, town, village or borough, etc. with some degree of general purpose self-governance. Local government area within a city / metropolitan area – a sub-tier of local government responsible for local services not overseen by the executive governing body (e.g., the City of London local authority within the Greater London Authority). Independent city – a city or town that does not form part of another local government entity (e.g., cities within U.S. States that are independent from county-level government such as Baltimore, Maryland or Carson City, Nevada; the German Kreisfreie Stadt or Stadtkreis such as Leipzig and München). Special city – cities or districts with special administrative status as compared to other similar urban areas (e.g., Seoul, South Korea; Kiev, Ukraine; Hong Kong Special administrative region). Federal district – a type of administrative division of a federation under the direct control of a federal government (e.g., Brasilia, Brazil; Washington, District of Columbia, USA; México, Distrito Federal, Mexico). Sovereign city-state – a state consisting of a sovereign city and its dependencies (e.g., Singapore; Vatican City). Metropolitan area – a region consisting of a densely populated urban core and its less-populated surrounding areas (e.g., an urban area closely linked economically and socially, such as a commuting catchment area). County – a geographical region that forms a subnational or substate division of governance that may include a number of cities, town, villages, etc. (e.g., Northumberland, UK). Other area Primary author of assessment Indicate who was predominately responsible for carrying out the risk or vulnerability assessment for your jurisdiction by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values: Dedicated city team Relevant city department Consultant International organization Community group Regional / state / provincial government National / central government Other Page 17 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Q 2.0b If yes: Please select the primary process or methodology used to undertake the risk or vulnerability assessment of your city. This is a table question with two columns. Answering this question will provide important information for other cities which are assessing their risks from or vulnerability to climate change for the first time and may be interested in the methodology you used. In the first column, please select the methodology you used to assess the risk in your city. If you have used a different assessment methodology than the ones proposed in the list of values, please select ‘Other’ and indicate the name of the methodology you have used. Select ‘Unknown’ if you do not know on which methodology the assessment was based. Primary methodology IPCC climate change impact assessment guidance OECD Strategic Environmental Assessment and Adaptation to Climate Change UNDP climate risk management methodologies ICLEI climate adaptation methodology (ADAPT) UK Climate Impacts Partnership Framework (UKCIP) World Bank Urban Risk Assessment (URA) Shaping climate resilient development: A framework for decision making (ECA) State or region vulnerability and risk assessment methodology Agency specific vulnerability and risk assessment methodology Proprietary Methodology Unknown Other Description Use the second column to provide more details on how the assessment was carried out. You can include details about whether the assessment covered city operations, private stakeholders, a full range of sectors etc. In particular, if you choose ‘Proprietary Methodology’ or ‘Other’ to describe your methodology in the first column, please provide details so that others may understand your approach. The following resources provide further information about physical risks and the methodology of risk assessment: The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (Working Group II: Impacts, Adaption and Vulnerability) ICLEI climate adaptation methodology (ADAPT) e.g. http://www.icleiusa.org/tools/adapt and http://archive.iclei.org/index.php?id=adaptation-toolkit0 . A report of the Economics of Climate Adaptation (ECA) Working Group: Shaping climate resilient development: A framework for decision making An example of a regional (country-level) vulnerability assessment is the Swedish Commission on Climate and Vulnerability report titled Sweden facing climate change – threats and opportunities An example of an agency specific vulnerability and risk assessment methodology is the US Department of Transportation’s Federal Highways Administration Methodology. Q 2.1 Do the current and/or anticipated effects of climate change present a significant risk to your city? The IPCC defines risk as the probability of a hazardous event or trend, multiplied by the consequences of this event. The consequences of a hazardous event are usually referred to as impacts. This question Page 18 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net asks to estimate the current magnitude of the impacts you have identified as arising from climate change. Select your response from the following options: Yes or Don’t Know – will direct you to Question 2.1a No – will direct you to Question 2.1b Q 2.1a If yes or don’t know: Please list the most significant climate hazards currently faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards. This table question is to identify climate hazards that your city currently experiences, and the probability and anticipated consequence of their impact. An example response has been provided in Box 1 below. Responses should be reported in the table provided using the drop down menus where appropriate, as detailed below: Current hazards Indicate the climate hazards that your city CURRENTLY experiences (i.e., without the effect of climate change). It is only necessary to select the most significant hazards that your city experiences; table rows can be added or deleted as needed. Please select the ‘most significant’ hazards as relevant to your city’s understanding of significance. Climate hazards can be selected from the following list of values: Rain storm Land fire Monsoon Flash/surface flood Heavy snow River flood Hail Coastal flood; Severe wind Groundwater flood Tornado Storm surge Cyclone (Hurricane/Typhoon) Permanent inundation Extratropical storm Salt water intrusion Tropical storm Ocean acidification Lightning / thunderstorm Atmospheric CO2 concentrations Fog Landslide Extreme winter conditions Avalanche Cold wave Rockfall Extreme cold days Subsidence Heat wave Water-borne disease Extreme hot days Vector-borne disease Drought Air-borne disease Forest fire Insect infestation More information about the climate hazards can be found in the Glossary. Probability of hazard Indicate the likelihood of each climate hazard identified in the first column occurring within the next five years. If possible, this response should be based on the outcome of a risk or vulnerability assessment process. If your assessment process has not provided quantitative estimates of likelihood, please estimate using the qualitative descriptors provided below. Select the most appropriate response from the following list of values: High – Extremely likely that the hazard will occur (e.g. greater than 1 in 2 change of occurrence over the next five years) Page 19 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Medium high – Highly likely that the hazard will occur (e.g. between 1 in 2 and 1 in 20 chance of occurrence over the next five years) Medium – Likely that the hazard will occur (e.g. between 1 in 20 and 1 in 200 chance of occurrence over the next five years) Medium low – Somewhat likely that the hazard will occur (e.g. between 1 in 200 and 1 in 2,000 chance of occurrence over the next five years) Low – Not likely that the hazard will occur (e.g. between 1 in 2,000 and 1 in 20,000 chance of occurrence over the next five years) Do not know Consequence of hazard Indicate the consequence of possible impacts of each climate hazard identified in the first column on your jurisdiction within the next five years. If possible, this response should be based on the outcome of a risk or vulnerability assessment process. If your assessment process has not provided quantitative estimates of level of impact, please estimate using the qualitative descriptors provided below. Select the most appropriate response from the following list of values: High – The hazard represents the highest level of potential concern for your jurisdiction. You anticipate that should it occur, the hazard would result in extremely serious impacts to your city and catastrophic interruption to day-to-day life. Medium high – The hazard represents a high level of potential concern for your jurisdiction. You anticipate that should it occur, the hazard would result in serious impacts to your jurisdiction and interruption to day-to-day life. Medium - The hazard represents a medium level of potential concern for your jurisdiction. You anticipate that should it occur, the hazard would result in impacts to your jurisdiction, but that these would be moderately significant to day-to-day life. Medium low – The hazard represents a lower level of potential concern for your jurisdiction. You anticipate that should it occur, the hazard would result in impacts to your jurisdiction, but that these would be less significant to day-to-day life. Low - The hazard represents the lowest level of potential concern for your jurisdiction. You anticipate that should it occur, the hazard would result in impacts to your jurisdiction, but that these would be insignificant in day-to-day life. Do not know Please see next page for an example. Page 20 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Box 1: Example reporting of current climate hazards Example: Imagined climate hazards faced by a tropical coastal city The theoretical city used for this example experiences frequent surface and river flooding during heavy rain storms due to large areas of impervious surface cover and an outdated storm sewer system. These storms occur primarily in winter months and while frequent, they do not significantly alter day-to-day life across the city but tend to affect localized areas with frequent low-level losses from economic, environmental and social impacts that create cumulative challenges for the local area. While infrequent, coastal flooding can also occur when heavy rain combines with high tides. These events cause widespread damage to waterfront areas and the cost of recovery is high. Conversely, the city typically experiences periods of drought during summer months when temperatures are high and rainfall is low. Although also a part of city life, particularly long periods of drought can severely affect local businesses and residents through water use restrictions and public health impacts. The table below provides an example of how this theoretical city would report its current climate change hazards. Current hazards Probability of hazard Consequence of hazard Rain storm High Low Coastal flood Medium high High Drought Medium low High Q 2.1b If no: Please explain why the anticipated effects of climate change present no significant risk to your city. If climate change does not present risks to your city, please detail why not. Page 21 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Q 2.1c Please identify how you expect climate change to affect the frequency and intensity of the hazards faced by your city and when you expect to experience those changes. This table question is to assess how climate hazards are expected to change in the future due to the effects of climate change. Responses should be reported in the table provided using the drop down menus where appropriate. Please refer to the example in Box 2 for more detail. Your climate change risk or vulnerability assessment should provide guidance as to how climate change is likely to affect climate hazards. Other possible resources for reporting this information include national climate change projections or reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)1. Future hazards Indicate the climate hazards that your jurisdiction expects to face IN THE FUTURE. It is only necessary to select the most significant hazards that your jurisdiction expects to experience in the future; table rows can be added or deleted as needed. [NB: please select the ‘most significant’ hazards as relevant to your jurisdiction’s understanding of significance.] Change in frequency Indicate the expected change in frequency of climate change hazards in your jurisdiction based on the following list of values: Increasing – climate change will cause the hazard to occur more frequently in the future Decreasing – climate change will cause the hazard to occur less frequently in the future None – climate change will have no effect on the frequency of hazards Do not know Change in intensity Indicate the expected change in intensity of climate change hazards in your jurisdiction based on the following list of values: Increasing – future hazards will be more intense as a result of climate change Decreasing – future hazards will be less intense as a result of climate change None – climate change will have no effect on the intensity of hazards Do not know Timescale Indicate the timescale at which changes to the frequency and intensity of climate change hazards are expected to occur based on the following list of values: Current – if your jurisdiction is already experiencing the identified impact from climate change. Short-term – if you anticipate your jurisdiction will experience the identified impact from climate change by 2025. Medium-term – if you anticipate your jurisdiction will experience the identified impact from climate change between 2026 and 2050 Long-term – if you anticipate your jurisdiction will experience the identified impact from climate change after 2051. 1 IPCC. (2015) Fifth Assessment Report. [Online] Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/. [Accessed: 16th November 2015]. Page 22 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Box 2: Example of future climate hazards Example: Imagined future climate hazards in a tropical coastal city The theoretical city used for this example currently experiences frequent flooding during heavy rainstorms. City climate change projections show that while total annual precipitation is likely to increase over time, the annual number of storm events is likely to decline. However, the intensity and frequency of extreme rain events has is projected to rise. Sea level rise is expected to increase the both the frequency and intensity of coastal flood events over the next 15 to 30 years, particularly during high tides. Higher sea levels will result in flooding father inland, and increase the duration and impact of coastal flood events. A higher frequency of extreme storms will also contribute to the intensity of coastal flooding and may increase the likelihood of coastal flood events. Periods of drought experienced by the city are expected to occur with similar regularity during the dry summer months. However, global projections for increased temperatures indicate that the intensity of droughts will likely escalate in the short-term. It is unknown if rising temperatures will result in changes to the frequency of drought events. While the city does not currently experience forest fires, the city’s climate risk and vulnerability assessment show that this could become a concern in the future due to rising temperatures and dry conditions caused by more intense periods drought. More frequent and intense rainstorms will increase the probability of lightning strikes, which when combined with drought conditions can increase the frequency and intensity of forest fires. The city’s climate risk and vulnerability assessment also shows that warmer winter conditions are expected to reduce the risk of extreme cold days. The table below provides an example of how this theoretical city would report its future climate change conditions. Future hazards Change in frequency Change in intensity Timescale Rain storm Increasing Increasing Current Coastal flood Increasing Increasing Medium-term Drought Do not know Increasing Short-term Forest fire Increasing Increasing Medium-term Extreme cold days Decreasing Decreasing Medium-term Q 2.1d Please describe the magnitude of the impact of these hazards and identify three critical assets or services that may be most impacted. Climate hazards This column will automatically pre-populate with your response from the Climate hazards column in 2.1c. Magnitude of impact Indicate the magnitude to which each climate hazard identified in the first column is expected to affect your city overall by selecting one of the following values: Extremely serious – you expect that the hazard may significantly affect the operation of a majority of critical assets and services across the city, and may result in the death or injury of a significant number of people and/or extreme economic disruption. Serious – you expect that the hazard may significantly affect the operation of some critical assets and services, or moderately affect a majority of critical assets and services, and may result in the death or injury of a number of people and/or major economic disruption Less serious – you expect that the hazard may moderately affect the operation of some critical assets and services, is unlikely to result in injury or death, but may cause moderate to insignificant economic disruption. Page 23 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Description of impact Provide a general description (in 250 words or less) of how each of the future climate hazards identified in the first column is expected to affect your city overall, including any interdependencies between various assets and services and any vulnerable populations that may be particularly affected. Asset or service In the three columns provided, indicate the three critical assets or services in your jurisdiction that will be MOST AFFECTED by the corresponding climate hazard in the first column based on the following list of values: [NB: Stakeholders have varied needs and priorities in relation to the risks of climate impacts. This question aims to capture an overview of your city’s overall assessment of the most critical city assets or services impacted by each climate hazard.] Energy Water Supply & Sanitation Transport Waste Management Information & Communications Technology Food & Agriculture Environment Industrial Commercial Residential Education Public health Community & Culture Law & Order Emergency Management Other Page 24 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Box 4: Example of critical assets or services affected by climate hazards Example: Imagined impacts of climate hazards to critical assets in a tropical coastal city The theoretical city used for this example anticipates an increase in the intensity and frequency of extreme rain events. Flooding caused by intense rainfall can result in damage to above ground and underground electrical infrastructure, leading to prolonged electrical power outages and economic loss. Heavy rainfall can also overwhelm local drainage and storm sewer infrastructure, triggering sewage overflows into local water bodies. Combined with the flooding of estuaries and connecting rivers, overflow events can increase the risk of exposure to water-borne pathogens through the contamination of drinking water or direct contact and significantly impact public health and ecosystems. Both the frequency and intensity of coastal flood events are expected to increase significantly over the next 15 to 30 years. The city’s waterfront is home to a major commercial port and hosts thousands of miles of transportation infrastructure, all of which is at risk to severe damage and disruption resulting from coastal flooding and sea level rise. These events could severely affect commercial transportation activity and cost billions of dollars annually in lost revenue and restoration costs. Businesses without sufficient resources or continuity planning will be forced to close, leading to further economic losses and increased unemployment. Periods of drought are expected to increase in intensity, while future changes to duration are uncertain. Elevated sea levels and excessive groundwater pumping to meet water supply demands can lead to the intrusion of seawater into the local aquifer system, which can significantly affect the availability of drinking water resources and the health of ecosystems. Diminished rainfall already affects agricultural production and the livelihoods it supports, and further drought conditions may lead to a decrease in food security for city residents and an increase in migration to the city from surrounding rural areas. Climate hazards Magnitude of impact Description of impact Asset or service Asset or service Asset or service Rain storm Serious The increased intensity and frequency of rainfall events poses a major threat to our energy and water infrastructure. Disruptions to the electricity grid would result in major economic losses. Increased sewer overflow events have already contaminated local waterways during the wet season, and with an increasing population, we anticipate greater public health issues, particularly in our most vulnerable communities. Energy Water Supply & Sanitation Public health Coastal flood Extremely Serious Coastal flooding will severely disrupt our economy and result in cascading challenges that include a shrinking commercial sector and rising unemployment. Major damage to commercial transportation infrastructure will take significant time to repair and may lead to economic stagnation. Transport Commercial Community & Culture Drought Serious Increased instances of drought will strain our city’s water resources, and the effect of drought on nearby agricultural producers will endanger our food supply. The potential increase in food prices will affect our vulnerable communities, and combined with an anticipated increase in rural-to-urban migration, the ability of our city to care for its residents will be compromised. Water Supply & Sanitation Food & Agriculture Public Health Page 25 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Q 2.1d If no: Please explain why the anticipated effects of climate change present no significant risk to your city. If climate change does not present risks to your city, please detail why not. Q 2.2 Do you consider that the effects of climate change could threaten the ability of businesses to operate successfully in your city? Response Please respond by selecting “Yes”, “No” or “Don’t know” from the drop down menu. You might answer “Yes” to this if, for example, the dominant industry in your city is dependent on certain climatic conditions, like skiing, or if significant areas of economic development are exposed to climate hazards such as flood. Explanation This question asks for further details about how the physical impacts of climate change will affect businesses operating in your city. Examples could include facilities / companies operating in a lowlying, increasingly flood-prone area having to cope with more frequent business disruptions. A further example could be that businesses that are dependent on certain weather conditions such as agriculture or tourism suffer drops in productivity due to reductions in water supply or poorly timed snow or rain. Examples of the types of risks that business may consider as affecting its ability to operate, include: higher costs of doing business, issues of workforce availability, transport disruptions, storm or flood damage, supply chain interruptions, or the health risks to residents due to frequent severe weather events. Where available please provide information about how the city assessed the risks to businesses. Page 26 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Adaptation Q 3.0 Please describe the process by which the city reviews its progress and manages overall responsibility for climate change. The intent of Q 3.0 is to understand how climate change action and progress are measured, monitored and managed. If relevant, details offered could include the following: department, committee, or person responsible for climate change-related activities; information on frequency of actions or reporting; next steps for governance and planned future changes; governance challenges encountered; and stakeholder engagement processes. Describe how your city reviews its efforts to adapt to a changing climate (that is, reducing the probability of a risk occurring). Q 3.1 Has the Mayor or local government committed to adapting to climate change across the geographical area of the city, town or settlement? Please respond to indicate whether your city’s Mayor or leadership has made a public commitment to adapt the city to climate change. The available responses in the drop down menu include: “Yes” – if a public commitment has already been made, “No” – if a commitment has not been made; or “In progress” – if a commitment is being developed. For example there is currently a resolution before your local council to make a commitment, but it has not yet been approved. If you select “yes” you will be directed to Question 3.1a. Q 3.1a If yes: Please select the type of commitment and attach evidence. This question allows you to provide more detailed information about the type of adaptation commitment your mayor or local government has made. Please select from the list of frameworks to identify the type of commitment, attach any relevant documents and provide more details on the specific commitments in the comments column. Type of commitment Select a commitment from the list of values: Compact of Mayors; Durban Adaptation Charter; Mayors Adapt (EU); Mexico City Pact; UNISDR, Making Cities Resilient Campaign; Individual City Commitment; Other Attach Click on ‘Choose file’, navigate to the file you want to upload and click ‘Open’. Once you can see the file name in the text field click ‘Attach’ to attach the document. Comments Please add further comments on your commitment Q 3.2 Does your local government have a plan that addresses climate change adaption? Please respond to indicate whether your city has produced an adaptation plan, or incorporated adaptation within the context of another long-term plan or strategy by selecting “Yes”, “No” or “In progress” from the drop down menu. If you select “Yes” you will be directed to Question 3.2a. If you select “No” or “In progress” you will be directed to Question 3.2b. A climate adaptation plan outlines the planned alterations to the city’s systems in response to actual or anticipated climate change. It should cover the services and departments directly managed by the city Page 27 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net government and may also consider the actions required by other stakeholders2. The aim of such a plan is to ensure that climate change risks are addressed in a preventive manner by putting in place a set of concrete measures to tackle those risks. If you wish to see an example of a climate adaptation plan please refer to Copenhagen’s which can be found here. Q 3.2a If yes: Please provide more information on your plan that addresses climate change adaptation and attach the document. If you have a climate adaptation plan please provide additional details about it in this question. Some cities are still working on their climate adaptation plan, attaching it here will enable them to understand your approach better. Please fill in the table with the following information: Publication title State the official name of your plan that addresses climate change adaptation. Year of publication Enter the year the plan was published as a numeric value. Attach the document Click on ‘Choose file’, navigate to the file you want to upload and click ‘Open’. Once you can see the file name in the text field click ‘Attach & Save’ to attach the document. Scope of plan Indicate the administrative boundary of the relevant plan or plans by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values: City / Municipality – a city, town, village or borough, etc. with some degree of general purpose self-governance. Local government area within a city / metropolitan area – a sub-tier of local government responsible for local services not overseen by the executive governing body (e.g., the City of London local authority within the Greater London Authority). Independent city – a city or town that does not form part of another local government entity (e.g., cities within U.S. States that are independent from county-level government such as Baltimore, Maryland or Carson City, Nevada; the German Kreisfreie Stadt or Stadtkreis such as Leipzig and München). Special city – cities or districts with special administrative status as compared to other similar urban areas (e.g., Seoul, South Korea; Kiev, Ukraine; Hong Kong Special administrative region). Federal district – a type of administrative division of a federation under the direct control of a federal government (e.g., Brasilia, Brazil; Washington, District of Columbia, USA; México, Distrito Federal, Mexico). Sovereign city-state – a state consisting of a sovereign city and its dependencies (e.g., Singapore; Vatican City). Metropolitan area – a region consisting of a densely populated urban core and its less-populated surrounding areas (e.g., an urban area closely linked economically and socially, such as a commuting catchment area). County – a geographical region that forms a subnational or sub-state division of governance that may include a number of cities, town, villages, etc. (e.g., Northumberland, UK). Other area 2 Based on the glossary document of the IPCC IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Barros, V.R., C.B. Field, D.J. Dokken, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee,K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 688. Page 28 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Area under your city's control Indicate the boundary of control in respect to adaptation planning by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values: Financial boundary of city governance Operational boundary of city governance Administrative boundary of city governance Primary author of plan Indicate the primary author responsible for the primary planning document to address climate adaptation in your jurisdiction by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values: Dedicated city team Relevant city department Consultant International organization Community group Regional / state / provincial government National / central government Other Q 3.2b If no or In progress: Please explain why not and any future arrangements you have to create a plan. This question only applies if you have selected “No” or “In progress” to Question 3.2. This question gives you the opportunity to provide more information or context on why you have not yet published an adaptation plan. Q 3.3 The Compact of Mayors requires cities to complete these additional questions on the climate hazards affecting your city and your city’s plans to adapt to these hazards. Other cities wishing to disclose further detail about their adaptation efforts are also encouraged to fill out the download. Please follow the instructions to download the Compact of Mayor's reporting framework administered by CDP. Completing these questions will satisfy the reporting requirements for compliance with the Compact of Mayor's commitments. Please save a copy of this file on your local network. If you see popup messages, please enable macros and ignore links. You can complete the questions off-line; we recommend that you save your entries frequently to ensure your data is captured. When you have completed your responses, please up-load this file to this question by clicking “Chose file”, navigating to the file you want to upload and clicking ‘Open’. Once you can see the file name in the text field click ‘Attach’ to attach the document. Page 29 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Q 3.4 Please describe the actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, or vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified on the previous page. Climate hazards This list will be automatically filled with the values you reported in the first column of question 2.1b. Action This column asks to detail the actions you are taking to adapt to climate change. The list of actions that you can select from is located in Appendix A in the questionnaire. Action Description In this column, please give any further relevant comments about the action. For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included in Box 4 below. Box 4: Example of adaptation action Climate hazard Action Action Description Rain storm Flood defenses – development and operation & storage We are testing various sea walls and barriers around the port to prevent the low-lying areas from flooding. The most successful version will be rolled out city-wide. Heat wave Shading in public spaces, markets Restaurants are able to expedite the licensing process for outdoor seating if they plant trees to provide shade in the public spaces around the location Page 30 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Social Risks Q 4.0 Does your city face any social risks as a result of climate change? Please respond by selecting “Yes”, “No” or “Don’t know” from the drop down menu. If you answer “Yes” or “Don’t know” you will be directed to question 4.0a, if you answer “No” you will be directed to question 4.0b. Cities and local governments may encounter social risks as a result of climate change. Examples of social risks might health and wellbeing, (e.g. susceptibility to disease vectors or heat-related morbidity and mortality), crime, social unrest, migration, or quality of life. Q 4.0a If yes or don’t know: Please complete the table. This question is structured as a table. The first column describes a number of possible social risks of climate change which can be selected from the drop down menu. Social risks List of Values: Fluctuating socio-economic conditions Increased incidence and prevalence of disease Increased demand for public services (including health) Increased risk to already vulnerable populations Increased conflict and/or crime Increased resource demand Loss of traditional jobs Migration from rural areas to cities Population displacement Other Anticipated timescale in years In the second column please choose the timescale by which you expect to experience social risks arising from climate change. The table offers four choices for timescale: Current - if your city is already experiencing the identified social risk Short term - if you anticipate your city will experience the identified social risk by 2025. Medium term - if you anticipate your city will experience the identified social risk between 2026 and 2050. Long term - if you anticipate your city will experience the identified social risk after 2051. Impact Description In the third column describe the impact. You may wish to describe the effect experienced or anticipated, the magnitude of the impact, anticipated timescale and sectors affected. Please provide in this column any additional information about any social risk you perceive. Multiple entries can be made in the table, using the ‘Add Row’ button to the bottom right. For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included in Box 5 on the next page. Page 31 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Box 5: Example of social risk Social Risk Anticipated timescale in years Impact Description Increased risk to already vulnerable populations Medium term With longer heat events, at-risk populations that have limited access to cooling centers or do not have airconditioning units within their place of residence are more susceptible to facing heat-related illnesses or death Increased and/or crime Short term In addition, loss of power after extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, can mean higher incidence of crime (e.g. looting and theft) conflict Q4.0b If no: Please explain why your city does not face social risks as a result of climate change. If climate change does not present social risks to your city, please detail why not. Page 32 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Opportunities General Guidance Climate change presents opportunities as well as risks. Climate change may offer economic or financial benefits within defined boundaries and locations. Specific Question Guidance Opportunities Q 5.0 Does climate change provide any economic opportunities for your city? Select your response from the following options: Yes - will direct you to Question 5.0a No - will direct you to Question 5.0b Don’t know - will direct you to Question 5.0a Many organizations have identified economic opportunities from mitigating, and adapting to climate change. For example, the 2007 Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change suggests that markets for low-carbon energy products are likely to be worth at least $500bn per year by 2050 and concludes that “individual companies and countries should position themselves to take advantage of these opportunities.” For some cities and regions with a strong foundation in scientific and technology research and development, advanced / precision manufacturing, export facilities, or those wellendowed with renewable energy resources (wind, solar, geothermal, marine, and biomass), financial opportunities to develop new goods and services may be realized. Q 5.0a Please indicate the opportunities and describe how the city is positioning itself to take advantage of them. This question invites you to detail the economic opportunities from mitigating, and adapting to, climate change and asks you to describe how your city is seizing them. Please select as many options as apply from the list of drop downs in the table. For example, you may note that your city sees the potential growth of the local solar industry, adding tax revenue and job growth in your city. Economic Opportunities Development of new business industries (e.g. clean tech) Additional funding opportunities Improved efficiency of operations Increased energy security Increased attention to other environmental concerns Increased infrastructure investment Other Page 33 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Describe how the city is maximizing this opportunity For each of the economic opportunities identified in the previous column, please highlight what your city is doing to seize this opportunity in this column. For example, if you selected “development of new business industries” under Economic Opportunity, you might detail your city’s efforts to encourage and support the development of new business industries within the city limits or provide consulting services to other municipalities who are trying to attract new business industries. Box 6: Example of economic opportunity Economic opportunity Describe how the city is maximizing this opportunity Improved efficiency of operations Performing a local and regional emissions inventory had the added benefit of identifying inefficiencies in operations by tracking data related to energy consumption, waste processes and water consumption at the government operations and regional levels. Increased attention to The city created a ‘congestion-zone’ in the downtown area where other environmental private cars are only allowed to drive during peak times if they pay a concerns substantial fee. This has decreased the number of cars on the street 65% during peak times. This was done to reduce emissions and reduce traffic but it has also lessened the amount of smog in the city by 30% and resulted in more income for the city. Q 5.0b If no: Why not? It is possible that your city does not see any potential economic opportunities from climate change. If this is the case, please explain why not. You might consider, for instance, that climate change presents only economic risks to your city, or that any potential opportunities are small and insignificant in comparison to the risks. Q 5.1 List any climate change-related projects for which you hope to attract private sector involvement. The private sector is a major source of greenhouse gases and therefore takes a large share of a city’s GHG inventory. Sustainability projects within your city may be a good opportunity to involve the private sector in reducing GHG emissions. The goal of this question is to assess the cooperation of publicprivate sectors on climate change issues. Use the table in this question to list the different projects your city is looking to attract private sector involvement for – you can add multiple projects by clicking ‘Add row’. Project area Use the drop down options to select the project area that is closest to the project that your city is seeking to collaborate with the private sector on. Project description Use this text box to describe the project. Cost of project (USD$) Give a rough estimate of the cost of the project, or how much private sector funding you hope to raise for the project. Page 34 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Emissions – Local Government Operations General Guidance If you identify in the Introduction to the ORS that you would like to report an emissions inventory for your local government’s operations, the Local Government module will appear in your questionnaire. The module gives you the opportunity to disclose your local government’s emissions inventory as well as some other metrics that will provide a holistic picture of your operations. If you have chosen to provide a Community emissions inventory on the Introduction page of the ORS, more information is provided in the next chapter of the guidance. This section of the questionnaire is divided into 4 pages: Methodology (Questions LGO1.0-1.4): This page collects information on the approach taken for preparing your emissions inventory. Importantly this page also allows users to define the 12 month period for which data is reported – this period should be consistent throughout the inventory. Where data is not available for an entire 12 month period, please extrapolate your data to a 12 month period. Energy Data (Questions LGO1.5-1.6): This page collects information on the energy purchased and consumed over the reporting year. GHG Emissions Data (Questions LGO1.7-1.12): This page collects information on the emissions released during the inventory year. External Verification (Questions LGO1.13): The final page of the local government operations inventory collects information on verification of emissions data. CDP recognizes that cities use different methodologies to measure their greenhouse gas emissions. As such, at this time CDP does not require cities to use a specific methodology to report to CDP - you may disclose an emissions inventory that has been calculated by any methodology. Please identify the methodology used at the appropriate place in the questionnaire. The methods and approaches for the measurement of emissions from local government operations are broadly similar to that of companies. A number of well-accepted methodologies for quantifying organizational GHG emissions exist, which have applicability to governments seeking to compile this information. Some of these have been adapted to include guidance specifically for government reporting. Interested cities can consult the following links to learn more about existing methodologies: The Greenhouse Gas Protocol from the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Business council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) The GHG Protocol for the U.S. Public Sector: Interpreting the Corporate Standard for U.S. Public Sector Organizations from the World Resources Institute (WRI) and LMI. Local Government Operations Protocol (LGOP) for the Quantification and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (Version 1.1), created in partnership with the California Air Resources Board, California Climate Action Registry, ICLEI-USA, and the Climate Registry. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; Page 35 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net ISO 14064 Greenhouse Gases series of standards; and GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) Public Sector Agency Supplement. In its work with the corporate sector, CDP encourages and supports the use of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG Protocol) developed by the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Cities may find it useful to consult this document. Note that ICLEI additionally have an international protocol that captures both local government (organizational) and community emissions, the International Local Government GHG Emissions Analysis Protocol (IEAP). This can be used by local governments globally to produce local government and community inventories. (Refer to the Community section of this guidance document for more information on community inventories.) Some of these measurement methodologies share general principles. Many of these principles are included in the WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol (and other similar methods) and the following is quoted directly from the ICLEI International Emissions Analysis Protocol (IEAP): Relevance: the greenhouse gas inventory shall appropriately reflect the greenhouse gas emissions of the local government or the community within the local government area and should be organized to reflect the areas over which local governments exert control and hold responsibility in order to serve the decision-making needs of users. Completeness: all greenhouse gas emission sources and activities within the chosen inventory boundary shall be accounted for. Any specific exclusion should be disclosed. Consistency: consistent methodologies to allow for meaningful comparisons of emissions over time shall be used. Any changes to the data, inventory boundary, methods, or any relevant factors in the time series shall be disclosed. Transparency: all relevant issues shall be addressed in a factual and coherent manner to provide a clear audit trail, should auditing be required. Any relevant assumptions shall be disclosed and include appropriate references to the accounting calculation methodologies and data sources used, which may include this Protocol and any relevant Supplements. Accuracy: the quantification of greenhouse gas emissions should not be systematically over or under the actual emissions. Accuracy should be sufficient to enable users to make decisions with reasonable assurance as to the integrity of the reported information.” Many methodologies also suggest similar best practices in measuring greenhouse gas emissions. Some of these suggestions are detailed here: Definition of boundaries (operational and organizational) to restrict emissions to only those that are relevant (or material) to the organization. In general, this relates to those emissions under the direct control or influence of the organization (and excludes community emissions, which are dealt with in a later section of the questionnaire). Attention to the integrity of the data sources and calculation rules to produce consistent results. Disaggregating total emissions for sector- or activity-based reporting. Many methodologies (though not all) also encourage the use of “Scopes” to differentiate the level of control over the source of the emissions. Use of emissions factors to normalize emissions data (carbon intensity or carbon equivalents) across gases, activities or geographies. Reporting against, as a minimum, the main greenhouse gases defined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) as well as nitrogen triflouride (NF3) Page 36 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net CDP also recognizes that many cities have created their own proprietary methodologies for calculating greenhouse gas emissions. If your city fits into this category, please provide as much information as possible about the methods you have used to measure your emissions. Please note that a metric tonne is equivalent to 2,204.6lbs. The “long ton”, a term generally used in Britain, is equivalent to 2,240lbs and the “short ton”, generally used in the USA, is equivalent to 2,000lbs. The CDP Cities information request asks for CO2e measurements in metric tonnes. For more information on any of the above considerations, please refer directly to the protocols listed in this section of the guidance document. Additional guidance on accounting methodologies and differences in approach can be found in numerous IPCC reports and research studies on urban emissions. In particular, the study Greenhouse Gas Emission Baselines for Global Cities and Metropolitan Regions by Kennedy, C.A. et al. provides a comparison of accounting practices of more than 40 global cities. Specific Question Guidance Methodology Q LGO1.0 Please state the dates of the accounting year or 12-month period for which you are reporting a GHG measurement inventory for your local government operations. The ORS provides a drop-down calendar for you to enter the dates requested. Entries MUST be for a 12-month period. Q LGO1.1 Please indicate the category that best describes the boundary of your GHG emissions inventory. A drop-down list is provided with the following values: Departments, entities or companies over which operational control is exercised; Departments, entities or companies over which financial control is exercised; Other The options allow for emissions to be captured from a ranging set of institutions, from government departments to quasi-governmental authorities, public corporations and special purpose vehicles. Further guidance on the suitability of these different methods is available in the Local Government Operations Protocol, the WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol, and Appendix B of the Global Protocol for Community Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories. If none of the listed options describes your boundary, please select “other” from the drop down list. You will then be provided with a text box in which to describe your boundary. Q LGO1.2 Please indicate which of the following major sources of emissions are included in your GHG emissions inventory. In the ORS, you will have the option to select as many as apply. The full list of emissions sources is below: Airport (s) Municipal vehicle fleet Page 37 of 87 Buildings Buses Regional trains Roads / highways @cdp | www.cdp.net Electricity generation Electricity transmission and distribution Employee commuting Incineration of waste Landfills Street lighting and traffic signals Subway / underground Thermal energy Waste collection Wastewater treatment Local Trains Water supply Maritime port Select “not included” if this source is part of your city government’s operational control but not included in your GHG emissions; select “not applicable” if this source is not within your city government’s operational control. The values selected may differ significantly from one city to the next, based on size, jurisdictional issues / relationship with other levels of government, and resources. For example, some cities will control utility services that service their population, but this is by no means universal. Others may offer extensive mass transit services which are under local control or influence, while others may not. By providing this information, you will help make comparisons between cities that share similarities in size, functions, and jurisdiction. Q LGO1.3 Please give the name of the primary protocol, standard, or methodology you have used to calculate GHG emissions. This question aims to understand which processes you have used to calculate emissions generated by your Local Government operations. In the first column you will see a list of methodologies. Please select the methodology on which you base the majority of your calculations. The system will only let you select one methodology. If you do not see your chosen methodology reflected in the list please select “Other” and describe your methodology. Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Public Sector Standard; International Emissions Analysis Protocol (ICLEI); ISO 14064; Local Government Operations Protocol (ICLEI / The Climate Registry / California Climate Action Registry / California Air Resources Board); Australian National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Determination; Other You might have calculated your emissions using multiple methodologies or by slightly modifying an existing methodology. In the second column, please detail how you have used multiple methodologies or how your city collects and manages data for your local government operations. Q LGO1.4 Which gases are included in your emissions inventory? Tick all that apply. The list consists of the main greenhouse gases defined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), as well as nitrogen triflouride (NF3). Page 38 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Energy data Q LGO1.5 Please give the total amount of fuel (refers to Scope 1 emissions) that your local government has consumed this year. The intent of the question is to capture data on fuel that is consumed (converted to end-use energy) directly by your city – referring to Scope 1. This fuel could be used in combustion in owned or controlled boilers, furnaces, vehicles, etc. The ORS provides a table for your answer with the following columns: Source Please select a source of your fuel consumption, the list of emissions sources is the same as in LGO1.2. Fuel The second column is a list of fuel types in a drop-down menu. The list of fuels is drawn from WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol Stationary Combustion Guidance document. The fuels are listed in alphabetical order. The most commonly used fuels are provided in the box below. Box 7: Most commonly used fuels, based on 2014 responses. Diesel/Gas oil Natural gas Motor gasoline (petrol) Biodiesels Under the additional headings of the table – ‘Amount’ and ‘Units’ – please provide the corresponding data for the fuel type used. The energy units should be selected from the following: GWh; MWh; kWh; TJ; GJ; MJ; Therms; Btu; m3; L; Metric tonnes; Short tons (see the Glossary for definitions of these units). Multiple entries can be made, using the ‘Add Row’ facility at the bottom right of the table. Q LGO1.6 How much electricity, heat, steam, and cooling (refers to Scope 2 emissions) has your local government purchased for its own consumption during the reporting year? This question covers the energy purchased from an energy provider where the fuel has already been converted to electric or thermal energy referring to Scope 2 emissions. As above, please select a consumption source from the ‘Source’ column. In the ‘Type’ column you will find a list of values in a drop-down menu, with the options: electricity; heat; steam; cooling or other. There is also a column for ‘Amount’ - to be expressed as numeric values and ‘Units’ – selected from GWh; MWh; kWh; TJ; GJ; MJ; Therms; Btu; m3; L; Metric tonnes; Short tons. Multiple entries can be made using the ‘Add Row’ facility to the bottom right of the table. Page 39 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net GHG Emissions Data Q LGO1.7 Please provide total (Scope 1 + Scope 2) GHG emissions for your local government’s operations, in metric tonnes CO2e. This question is your opportunity to enter a numeric value for the total figure of your local government’s GHG emissions in the selected year. Please note that these are local government operation emissions only and should be provided in metric tonnes CO2e. To prevent you from accidently entering total emissions in the wrong units we have added a validation rule to this question. If the number provided has less than 3 digits or more than 7 digits a warning message will pop up when the questionnaire is submitted. Verify the numbers are correct and presented in metric tonnes CO2e before confirming and pressing submit. Q LGO1.8 If applicable, please provide the following GHG emissions. If your city disaggregates emissions into Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, please enter the totals for your reporting year here. Refer to your city’s reporting methodology or protocol to determine if this categorization is relevant for your city. Scopes are a common categorization and more details are available in the following methodologies: International Emissions Analysis Protocol Local Government Operations Protocol WRI / WBCSD Greenhouse Gas Protocol For example, the following description of scopes is taken directly from the Local Government Operations Protocol: Scope 1: All direct GHG emissions (with the exception of direct CO2 emissions from biogenic sources). Scope 2: Indirect GHG emissions associated with the consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, steam, heating, or cooling. A two-column table is provided with the following column headers: Total Scope 1 activity in metric tonnes CO2e emitted Enter your total scope one emissions in metric tonnes CO2e as a numeric value. Total Scope 2 activity in metric tonnes CO2e emitted Enter your total scope one emissions in metric tonnes CO2e as a numeric value. If you do not break down your emissions in this way then please skip this question. To prevent you from accidently entering incorrect emissions figures we have added a validation rule to this question. If the sum of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions reported in this question is greater or less than the total emissions reported in Question LGO1.7 a warning message will pop up when the questionnaire is submitted. Verify the numbers are correct and presented in metric tonnes CO2e before confirming and pressing submit. Q LGO1.9 Do you measure Scope 3 emissions? Please provide a Yes / No answer using the drop down menu provided. If you answer “Yes” you will be directed to question LGO 1.9a, if you answer “no” you will be directed to question LGO 1.9b. As an example, the following description of Scope 3 emissions is taken directly from the ICLEI Local Government Operations Protocol: Page 40 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Scope 3: “All other indirect emissions not covered in Scope 2, such as emissions resulting from the extraction and production of purchased materials and fuels, transport-related activities in vehicles not owned or controlled by the reporting entity (e.g., employee commuting and business travel), outsourced activities, waste disposal, etc.” Further detail on measuring Scope 3 emissions can be found in the ICLEI Local Government Operations Protocol. Q LGO1.9a If yes: Please complete the table. This is a table question with three columns to allow explanation of the Scope 3 emissions sources which are included in the local government operations inventory. The columns provided are as follows: Source of Scope 3 emissions Provide a breakdown of the different categories of scope 3 emissions by choosing a source from the list of values: Employee Commuting; Employee Business Travel; Emissions from Contracted Services; Upstream Production of Materials and Fuels; Upstream and Downstream Transportation of Materials and Fuels; Waste Related Scope 3 Emission Sources; Other You can find more information on scope 3 upstream and downstream activities here. Metric tonnes CO2e emitted Provide the amount of CO2e emitted for each source. Comment Provide more detail about your Scope 3 emissions reported. Box 8: Example of Scope 3 detail Source of Scope emissions Employee commuting 3 Emissions (metric tonnes Comment CO2e) 4000 Estimate based on a survey conducted amongst city employees regarding their ways of traveling to work Q LGO1.9b If No: Please explain why not and detail your plans to do so in the future, if any. If you do not measure Scope 3 emissions, please explain why not. Additionally, please go into detail about your plans to do so in the future, if you have any. Q LGO1.11 Where it will facilitate a greater understanding of your government emissions, please provide a breakdown of these emissions by department, facility, source or by any other classification system used in your city. Many cities categorize their emissions differently. The intent of this question is to learn more about how your organization disaggregates emissions, which can be valuable information for tracking, monitoring and evaluation, and reporting purposes. The information will also contribute to a comparative understanding between city departments / organizations, or among cities themselves. Please note that this question is flexible to accommodate all of the different kinds of categories used by cities. Page 41 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net You are provided with a table in the ORS to structure your response under the following headings: Department / Facility / Source / Other Please use this field to denote the categories the city uses to classify emissions. This can be by department, facility, source or any other categorization. If you have data for more than one Type of emissions as defined in the second column create multiple rows for each categorization. Scope For more information about scopes see Questions LGO 1.8-1.9. Select from the following options: Scope 1 Scope 2 Scope 3 Total Figure Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) Enter a numeric value for the amount of emissions that correspond with the previous two columns. Box 9: Example of emissions categorization For example, a city may categorize its emissions in the following way: Department / Facility / Source / Other Scope Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) Parks Department Scope 1 2300 Parks Department Scope 2 475000 Office of Financial Affairs Scope 2 15000 Mayor’s Office Total figure 10000 Public Works Total figure 350000 Other Total figure 5000 Department / Facility / Source / Other Type Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) Facility A Scope 2 47500 Facility A Scope 1 1500 Facility B Scope 1 10000 Facility C Scope 2 350000 Q LGO1.12 Please indicate if your emissions have increased, decreased, or stayed the same since your last emissions inventory, and please describe why. The purpose of this table is to understand the change in emissions over time and the factors which led to that change. Page 42 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Change in emissions In the first column, please select how your emissions have changed compared to the emissions you reported last time. A drop down with the following list of values is provided: Increased; Decreased; Stayed the same; This is our first year of calculation; Other In the second column, please indicate some of the reasons you have identified led to this change. For example if you previously reported emissions from 2012 and you are now reporting emissions from 2014 please explain any material difference in the figures. For instance you may be including or excluding different sources, the methodology may have changed, boundaries may have changed, and/or emissions reduction actions may have been realized. Box 10: Example of change in LGO emissions compared to the year prior Change in emissions Reason for change Decreased Last year we reported emissions from our last inventory calculated in 2012. This year we have updated our inventory and notice a decrease in our total emissions. We believe this change can be explained by multiple factors namely: change in methodology, better and more precise data and the result of the policies which we have implemented aimed at reducing emissions. External Verification Q LGO1.13 Has the GHG emissions data you are currently reporting been externally verified or audited in part or in whole? City governments (or any large organization) may see value in having external verification or auditing of their emissions and emission reduction efforts. This can ensure higher levels of quality control / quality assurance. The ability to call on verified data may provide your government with a powerful tool in efforts to influence policy or regulation at other levels of government or with other community stakeholders. Please respond to this question by selecting “Yes” or “No” from the drop down menu provided. If you answer “Yes” you will be directed to question LGO 1.13a, if you answer “no” you will be directed to question LGO 1.13b. Q LGO1.13a If yes: Please provide the following information about the emissions verification process. In the table provided, please state the name of the verifier, select the year of verification from the list of values and attach your verification certificate in the columns provided. To attach a document click on ‘Choose file’, navigate to the file you want to upload and click ‘Open’. Once you can see the file name in the text field click ‘Attach & Save’ to attach the document. In the “Comments” column, please provide additional details on your verification process, such as: - Percentage of emission inventory audited - Sections of emission inventory audited Page 43 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Q LGO1.13b If no: Please describe your plans to verify your emissions in the future. Please give more details on whether and how you plan to verify your emissions related to your local government operations in the future. Page 44 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Emissions - Community General Guidance If you identify in the Introduction to the ORS that you would like to report an emissions inventory for your community, the Community module will appear in your questionnaire. The module gives you the opportunity to disclose your community (or “city-wide”) emissions inventory as well as some other metrics that will provide a holistic picture of your emissions and activities. This section of the questionnaire is divided into 3 pages: Date and Boundary (Questions C1.0-1.1): This page defines the 12 month period over which data is reported and the boundary of your community emissions inventory – this period and boundary should be consistent throughout the inventory. You must provide a 12 month period. Emissions and Energy Data (Questions C1.2-1.12): This page collects information on the methodology used to complete your emissions inventory and the energy and greenhouse emissions relevant to the reporting year. External Verification (Question C1.13): The final page of the community emissions inventory collects information on verification of emissions data. In general, emissions from local government operations represent only a small portion of overall emissions from the community over which the government has jurisdiction. Capturing community emissions – often referred to as the “geographic” or “city-wide” emissions inventory – creates a snapshot of all local activities and their contribution to global climate change. Collating community emissions can provide a basis from which cities can develop policy and enact regulation with the aim of reducing these emissions. This distinction and imperative to capture data for both government operations and the wider community represent the greatest difference between appropriate city-specific protocols and corporate emissions reporting protocols. Note that while protocols for community emissions do exist, there is a range of opinion and differences in application for what emissions are calculated. In many cases, the decision on inclusion will come down to preferences and capacity of the organization undertaking the calculations. The unbounded nature of cities, in terms of where they draw their resources from and the goods and services that flow in and out of them, presents great complexity in efforts to calculate emissions. Global momentum is growing around the protocol created by C40, WRI, ICLEI, and the World Bank, called the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories. A number of large cities have piloted the first version of this methodology in 2013, and the partnership published this full version in 2014. Many other methodologies exist. It may be the case that individual cities are using methodologies designed for national or regional inventories, but ‘downscaling’ them for their jurisdictions. Thus, using the IPCC national inventory framework as the basic accounting architecture, but tailoring to local circumstances to manage data availability and reliability issues, is one approach. Other examples include the use of Greenhouse Gas Regional Inventory Protocol (GRIP), which, as the name implies, is designed for regional calculations. Some cities have adapted this framework for their boundaries (e.g. Sacramento, California). Even cities that use common approaches produce variations in what is included in their community emissions. The World Bank, UNEP and UN Habitat have also created an Page 45 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net emissions inventory protocol for cities (International Standard for Determining Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Cities) (Note that this protocol will be replaced by the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Inventories). Cities can report their emissions on CDP’s platform regardless of which protocol or methodology they have used to develop their inventory. Specific Question Guidance Date and Boundary Q C1.0 Please state the dates of the accounting year or 12-month period for which you are reporting a GHG measurement inventory for your community. The ORS provides a drop-down calendar for you to enter the dates requested. Entries must be for a 12-month period. If you do not have data for the entire 12-month period, please extrapolate to 12 months. Q C1.1 Please indicate the category that best describes the boundary of your community GHG emissions inventory. In your answer, please choose from the list of values provided: Administrative boundary of a local government Combination of administrative divisions A metropolitan area Other Administrative boundary of a local government refers to the area covered by the jurisdiction of a single local government, usually at the sub-city level (e.g. a borough of ward). Combination of administrative divisions refers to the area covered by the jurisdiction of multiple local governments, usually at the sub-city level. A metropolitan area, also referred to as metropolitan region or metro area, consists of a single large urban area or an agglomeration of urban areas, and usually comprises multiple local governments. Examples of approaches that might be used by your city other than its geopolitical boundary include metro-wide, county or regional GHG accounting. Circumstances where this might be undertaken include where your city’s geopolitical boundary is small relative to the total population, economic activity and land area that are symbiotic with a particular urban core or center. If you select ‘Other’, you will be given the opportunity to enter the relevant boundary in a text box. Emissions and Energy data Q C1.2 Please give the name of the primary protocol, standard, or methodology you have used to calculate GHG emissions. In the ORS, you will see a list of methodologies developed by third parties. Please select the primary methodology that you followed in measuring greenhouse gas emissions for your community. If you do not see your chosen methodology reflected in the list please select “Other” and describe your methodology. The values provided are: Page 46 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GPC), (WRI, C40 and ICLEI) International Emissions Analysis Protocol (ICLEI); International Standard for Determining Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Cities (UNEP, UN Habitat, World Bank); 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (ICLEI); Greenhouse gas Inventory & Research Center of Korea (GIR); Other Please select “Other” if you use a proprietary methodology or a third party methodology that you do not see listed here. Enter the name of the methodology in the text box provided. If you select the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GPC), (WRI, C40 and ICLEI) you will skip Questions C1.6, C1.7 and C1.8 and be directed to answer questions C1.9a and C1.9b. If you choose any other protocol listed including ‘Other’ you will be directed to answer Questions C1.6, C1.7 and C1.8 and will skip Question C1.9a and C1.9b. In the second column please provide more detail on the methodology used or whether you utilized a combination of protocols. Q C1.3 Which gases are included in your emissions inventory? Tick all that apply. The list consists of the main greenhouse gases defined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), as well as nitrogen trifluoride (NF3). Q C1.4 Please detail total (Scope 1 + Scope 2) emissions for your community, in metric tonnes CO2e. This question is your opportunity to enter the total figure for your community’s GHG emissions in the selected year. Total emissions To prevent you from accidently entering total emissions in the wrong units we have added a validation rule to this question. If the number provided has less than 3 digits or more than 9 digits a warning message will pop up when the questionnaire is submitted. Verify the numbers are correct and presented in metric tonnes CO2e before confirming and pressing submit. Attach your inventory Use this column to attach your city’s inventory. You can do this by clicking “Chose file”, navigating to the inventory file and clicking “Attach”. Level of confidence Please select the level of confidence associated with your total emissions figure. High – select high if your inventory has a high level of accuracy Medium – select medium if your inventory has a medium level of accuracy Low – select low if your inventory has a low level of accuracy Comment on level of confidence Use this text box to comment on your selection in the Level of confidence drop down. Page 47 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Q C1.5 If applicable, please provide a breakdown of your GHG emissions by scope. If you categorize your emissions by scope, please enter the appropriate figures for your Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 3 emissions are covered in questions C1.9a and C1.11. Scope This table question breaks down emissions into scope 1 and scope 2 in column one. Scope 1 emissions are further split into emissions excluding grid-supplied energy generation and emissions exclusively from grid-supplied energy generation within your city boundaries Metric tonnes CO2e Your answers will be numeric entries (metric tonnes of CO2e) in the second column. If you do not break down your scope 1 emissions in this way then please still fill in your total scope 1 emissions in the third row. Level of confidence Please select the level of confidence associated with your total emissions figure. High – select high if your scope breakdown has a high level of accuracy Medium – select medium if your scope breakdown has a medium level of accuracy Low – select low if your scope breakdown has a low level of accuracy Q C1.6 If protocol besides Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (GPC), (WRI, C40 and ICLEI): Where it will facilitate a greater understanding of your community’s emissions, please provide a breakdown of these emissions by end user (buildings, water, waste, transport), economic sector (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional), IPCC sector (stationary combustion; mobile combustion, Industrial processes, waste), or any other classification system used in your city. The purpose of this question is to learn more about how your city government breaks down emissions, which can be valuable information for comparative understanding between cities. Please note that this question is flexible to accommodate many of the different kinds of categories used by cities. You are provided with a table in the ORS to structure your response. Examples of how your city might characterize and differentiate emissions are listed below and also shown in Box 12: Sector/End User: End user: buildings, transport, water utilities, wastewater utilities, etc. Economic sector: commercial, residential, industrial, agricultural, freight and logistics, etc. IPCC sector: Energy (stationary combustion, mobile combustion, and fugitive); Industrial Processes and Product Use; Agricultural, Forestry and Other Land Use; and Waste. Other: please describe if your city uses another classification approach (e.g. by geography or zone, by zoning or land use classification, etc.) Sector: Please indicate which the relevant GHG emissions sector from the drop down options Scope: please indicate the scope considered for each sector Emissions: emissions associated with that sector Box 11: Example community inventory breakdowns End user / Economic sector / IPCC Sector sector / Other Scope Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) Buildings Buildings Scope 1 475000 Water Water Scope 1 15000 Waste Waste Scope 1 10000 Page 48 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Transport Transport Scope 1 30000 Other Other Scope 1 5000 End user / Economic sector / IPCC sector / Scope Other Emissions tonnes CO2e) Stationary Scope 2 379000 Mobile Scope 2 18000 Railways Scope 2 350000 Total Scope 2 747000 (metric Q C1.7 Please give the total amount of fuel (referring to Scope 1 emissions) consumed in your city during the reporting year. This question asks you to provide the total amount of fuel that has been consumed within your citywide reporting boundary during the reporting year - referring to Scope 1 emissions. Each amount of fuel reported will depend on the types of fuel used within your boundary and the quantity of each fuel used. For instance, you might include the fuel consumed by residential, commercial, and industrial buildings, and road transportation. Do not include emissions from the generation of grid-supplied energy. The ORS provides a table for your answer. The ‘Fuel’ column is pre-populated with fuel types listed in a drop-down menu. The list of fuels is drawn from the WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol Stationary Combustion Guidance document and is provided with definitions in Appendix 2 of this document. ‘Units’ should be selected from the following: GWh; MWh; kWh; TJ; GJ; MJ; Therms; Btu; m 3; L; Metric tonnes; Short tons (see the Glossary for definitions of these units). Multiple entries can be made, using the ‘Add Row’ facility at the bottom right of the table. Please give a description on how the fuel was used and what it was used for in the ‘Source’ column. For example a total fuel consumption figure by the local airport or fuel use by the bus fleet can be reported. In the Sector column, enter the corresponding sector for the amount entered. Q C1.8 How much electricity, heat, steam, and cooling (referring to Scope 2) has been consumed by your city during the reporting year? This question asks you to detail the amount of electricity, heat, steam, or cooling, referring to Scope 2 emissions that has been supplied to all of the entities within your city-wide boundary during the reporting year. Your number will depend on which energy users you include in your total. For instance, you might include residential, commercial, and industrial buildings and rail transportation. In the ‘Type‘ column, please select a value from the dropdown list (electricity, heat, steam and/or other) you want to provide an amount for. Enter the amount and select its corresponding unit in the following columns. Please also give a description on how the fuel was used and what it was used for in the ‘Source‘ column. In the Sector column, enter the corresponding sector for the amount entered. Q C1.9a Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (GPC), (WRI, C40 and ICLEI). Please complete the corresponding emissions for each row in the table below. If you have chosen to report using the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (GPC), (WRI, C40 and ICLEI), please use the embedded table to disaggregate and report your emissions by sector and by scope: Page 49 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Sector and Scope (GPC reference number) Select from the drop-down list provided to report emissions from each of the emissions sources listed: Stationary Energy: energy use – Scope 1 (I.X.1); Stationary Energy: energy use – Scope 2 (I.X.2); Stationary Energy: energy use – Scope 3 (I.X.3); Stationary Energy: energy generation supplied to the grid – Scope 1 (I.4.4); Transportation – Scope 1 (II.X.1); Transportation – Scope 2 (II.X.2); Transportation – Scope 3 (II.X.3); Waste: waste generated within the city boundary – Scope 1 (III.X.1); Waste: waste generated within the city boundary – Scope 3 (III.X.2); Waste: waste generated outside the city boundary – Scope 1 (III.X.3); Industrial Processes and Product Use – Scope 1 (IV); Agriculture, Forestry and Land Use – Scope 1 (V); TOTAL Scope 1 (Territorial emissions); TOTAL BASIC emissions; TOTAL BASIC and BASIC+ emissions Emissions Metric Tonnes CO2e Enter the corresponding quantity of emissions in metric tonnes CO2e. Please fill in every row of the table with the relevant emissions. Remember to only report data for the 12 month time-period selected in Q C1.0. Please refer to the GHG report spreadsheet provided to you in C1.9b for further help with these emissions. Q C1.9b Please provide a breakdown of fuel use and emissions by subsector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (GPC), (WRI, C40 and ICLEI) and attach GHG emissions report. Please click here to download a spreadsheet which you can use to enter your breakdown of fuel use and emissions by subsector and scope. Save your completed report and attach it by clicking on ‘Choose file’, navigate to the file and click ‘Open’. Once you can see the file name in the text field click ‘Attach & Save’ to attach the document. Please refer to the guidance included within the spreadsheet for advice on how to use it. Q C1.11 If protocol besides Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC), (WRI, C40 and ICLEI): Do you measure Scope 3 emissions? Please provide a Yes / No answer using the drop down menu provided. If you answered “Yes” you will be directed to question Q C1.11a, if you answer “No” you will be directed to question C1.11b Examples of Scope 3 emissions that a city may include in its community emissions inventory include: Emissions from landfills outside the community’s boundary Emissions from ships, trains and airplanes used to ferry passengers and freight to and from the boundary of a community. For more information on Scope 3 emissions, please see, for example, the ICLEI International Emissions Analysis Protocol and GPC. Q C1.11a If yes: Please provide more detail about how you measure Scope 3 emissions, including total Scope 3 emissions in metric tonnes CO2e. We anticipate that there will be variations between cities in how Scope 3 emissions are calculated. The information you provide in the question will assist in making comparison between cities and drawing lessons learned that can assist cities in selecting and implementing appropriate methods for accurately measuring and managing this type of emissions. Page 50 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net This is a table question with three columns to allow explanation of the Scope 3 emissions sources which are included in the city-wide inventory. Source of Scope 3 emissions Select from the drop-down list provided to report the source of your scope 3 emissions: Goods and services; Upstream emissions from energy use; Water; Wastewater; Road; Aviation; Waste; Transmission and distribution losses; Railways; Water-borne navigation; Food; Other Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) Enter the amount of CO2e emitted for each source as a numeric value. Comment Provide more detail about your Scope 3 emissions reported. Q C1.11b If no: Please explain why not and detail your plans to do so in the future, if any. Please give an account of the reasons behind currently not measuring scope 3 emissions and an insight into plans to do so in the future. Q C1.12 Please indicate if your emissions have increased, decreased, or stayed the same since your last emissions inventory, and please describe why. The purpose of this table question is to understand the change in your emissions over time and the factors which have led to that change. In the ‘Change in emissions’ column, please select how your emissions have changed compared to the emissions you reported last time: Increased; Decreased; Stayed the same; This is our first year of calculation; Other Reason for change Please indicate some of the reasons you have identified led to this change. Page 51 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net For example, if you previously reported emissions from 2012 and you are now reporting emissions from 2015 please explain any material difference in the figures. You may be including or excluding different sources, the methodology may have changed, boundaries may have changed, and/or emissions reductions actions may have been realized. Box 12: Example of change in community emissions compared to the year prior Change in emissions Please describe why Decreased City-wide GHG emissions were 5% lower in 2015 compared to 2012, when we last reported our inventory. This is due to a combination of factors including: a successful home energy efficiency program and further decarbonization of the national electricity grid In cases where there is no change from data previously reported indicate that there is no change and why. External verification Q C1.13 Has the GHG emissions data you are currently reporting been externally verified or audited in part or in whole? City governments (or any large organization) may see value in having external verification or auditing of their emissions and emission reduction efforts. This can ensure higher levels of quality control / quality assurance. Please respond to this question by selecting “Yes” or “No” from the drop down menu provided. If you answer “Yes” you will be directed to question Q C1.13a, if you answer “No” you will be directed to question C1.13b. Q C1.13a If yes: Please provide the following information about the emissions verification process. This is a table question with four columns to provide an opportunity to describe relevant information about this verification process with the following headings: Name of verifier List the names of organizations which have verified your greenhouse gas emissions Year of verification Choose a year (between 2000 and 2015) when the verification process took place. Attach a verification certificate This function allows you to attach your verification certificate document. To attach a document click on ‘Choose file’, navigate to the file you want to upload and click ‘Open’. Once you can see the file name in the text field click ‘Attach & Save’ to attach the document. In the “Comments” column, please provide additional details on your verification process, such as: Percentage of emission inventory audited Sections of emission inventory audited Q C1.13b If no: Please describe your plans to verify your emissions in the future. Please indicate whether plans exist to verify greenhouse gas emissions in the future. If your city is planning to verify emissions, please provide additional information on the process. Page 52 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Strategy General Guidance In this section, you will find questions about your city’s strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions (from your local government’s operations and your community) and adapting to a changing climate and their effects. If you have not reported one of the two emissions inventories (local government operations or community), you will still have the opportunity to answer questions about reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from both local government operations and community. Please take care to enter your emissions reduction activities in the correct section. We recognize that city governments may have greenhouse gas reduction strategies even though they have not completed an inventory yet. The module is organized into four pages: GHG Emission Reduction – Local Government Operations: Questions 6.0-6.1 explore the emission reduction activities being applied to your city government operations; GHG Emission Reduction – Community: Questions 7.0-7.1b explore your emissions reduction and action planning and governance Questions 7.2-7.4 explore the emission reduction activities being applied for your community; Renewable Energy: Questions 8.0-8.1 ask about your city’s renewable energy or electricity targets, as well as strategic planning within the city Water: Questions 9.0-9.1 examines risks to your city’s water supply and actions to address those risks. Specific Question Guidance Please read the full action list in Appendix D and ensure that all the actions you are taking are captured in your response. GHG Emission Reduction – Local Government Operations Q 6.0 Do you have a GHG emissions reduction target in place for your local government operations? To respond to this question, please select “Yes” or “No” from the drop-down menu. Please note this question applies to government operations only. Community emission reduction targets will be addressed later in this section (Q7.0). Responding “Yes” directs you to Question 6.0a, where you will be asked to provide details of your reduction target; responding “no” directs you to Question 6.0b. Page 53 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Q 6.0a If yes: Please provide details of your local government operations emissions reduction target. Please provide your response in the table provided under the following headings: Sector Please select total emissions in order to report the emissions reduction target for your total local government emissions inventory. If you have a sector breakdowns of your local government emissions reduction target, please add a row and select the relevant sector. Define target boundary Please define the boundary of the emissions source covered by your reduction target. Your target may apply to your entire emissions inventory, or it may apply to a select group of emissions sources within your city government’s operations. Please use sector names consistent with those used in your emissions inventory. Baseline year Please select the appropriate year from the drop down menu provided. Your baseline year (also known as a “base year” or “representative year”) is the reference year from which your greenhouse gas reductions are measured. Please ensure the baseline year corresponds to the total emissions inventory if Total is selected in column 1. If you are reporting a target for a specific sector of your local government inventory, please provide the baseline year for that sector. Baseline emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) Please enter the numerical value of your baseline emissions, without commas. Your baseline emissions are the greenhouse gas emissions from your baseline year on which your target is based. Please ensure the baseline emissions corresponds to the total emissions inventory if Total is selected in column 1. If you are reporting a target for a specific sector of your local government inventory, please provide the baseline emissions for that sector. Please ensure that the baseline emissions correspond with the baseline year reported in column 2. Percentage reduction target Please enter the numerical value of your percentage reduction target, without commas and without the percentage symbol (%). If your target is not currently expressed as a percentage, please convert it into this format (for example an absolute emissions reduction in metric tonnes CO2e can be converted into a percentage reduction relative to the base year). If this is not possible, please note your target reduction and other relevant detail in the Comment column for this question. Target date Please select the year by which you anticipate achieving your goal from the drop down menu. You are able to select the years 2016, 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, 2045, 2050. If your target year is not in the list of values please select “other” and indicate it in the space provided. Comment Please provide any other contextualizing information about your reduction target in the Comment column. If your city has an intensity target (i.e. “emissions reductions relative to productivity or economic output, for instance, tons CO2/million dollars GDP”, as defined by the WRI) please provide details here. Page 54 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Box 13: Example GHG emissions target – Local Government Operations Sector Define target boundary Baseline year Baseline emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) Percentage reduction target Target date Comment Total Total municipal inventory 1990 60 000 20 2025 Currently we are well on the way to meeting our target and are setting a target for municipal vehicles. Add row Q 6.0b If no: Please explain why you do not have a local government operations emissions reduction target. This question offers you the opportunity to provide further information about your plans for emissions reduction. Q 6.1 What actions are you undertaking to reduce your emissions in your local government operations? This question is an opportunity to provide detail of your activities to reduce emissions from your local government’s operations. The ORS offers the opportunity to specify detail on each action you are taking, providing a table with the following headings to structure your response per action: Emissions reduction activity Individual actions fall within a broader group of activity. The list of activities is provided in Appendix C of the questionnaire. Anticipated emissions reduction – cumulative over the lifetime of the action (metric tonnes CO2e) Please enter the numerical value of the total cumulative anticipated emissions reductions as a result of the action in metric tonnes CO2e without commas and without unit symbols. This can be an estimate. The anticipated emissions reduction – cumulative over the lifetime of the action estimates the total quantity of emissions saved over the lifetime of the energy saving measures installed. In the above example, if the average lifetime of the energy saving measures is assumed to be 10 years, then the cumulative reductions from this Action will be approximately 1,000,000 mtCO2e. In another example, City B plans to replace a coal-fired power station with several smaller gas-fired combined heat and power (CHP) plants in 2016. Once these are installed, and the coal-fired power station has been decommissioned, the CHP plants are expected to reduce emission by a combined total of 200,000 mtCO2e per year. The CHP plants are expected to operate for twenty years and thus the anticipated emissions reduction on a cumulative basis would be 4,000,000 mtCO2e. Page 55 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Action description The ORS provides a free text box for you to enter further information about your greenhouse gas reduction efforts. Text can be entered freely into this field but please keep this as concise as possible. For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included in Box 15 on the next page. Box 14 : Example emissions reduction activities Emissions reduction activity Anticipated Action description emissions reduction – cumulative over the lifetime of the action (metric tonnes CO2e) LED / CFL / 6000 other luminaire technologies With money provided by an LED manufacturer we installed LEDs in the streetlights surrounding the library and the high school. This is currently a pilot- if we save the amount of electricity that is projected we will replace all streetlights in the downtown area. Improve bus 1000 infrastructure, services, and operations A study by the technical university found that emissions could be drastically reduced by implementing a bus rapid transit program from the suburbs into the city center. We have received financing for this initiative from a local sponsor but are still waiting on approvals from the regional government as the bus route crosses outside the city boundary. GHG Emission Reduction – Community Please read the full action list in Appendix D and ensure that all the actions you are taking are captured in your response. Q 7.0 Please describe the process by which the city reviews its progress and manages overall responsibility for climate change. The intent of Q 7.0 is to understand how climate change action and progress are measured, monitored and managed. If relevant, details offered could include the following: department, committee, or person responsible for climate change-related activities; information on frequency of actions or reporting; next steps for governance and planned future changes; governance challenges encountered; and stakeholder engagement processes. Use this text box to describe how your city reviews its efforts to mitigate climate change (that is, reduce greenhouse gas emissions). Q 7.1 Does your city have a climate change action plan for reducing GHG emissions? Page 56 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Please respond to indicate whether your city has a climate change action plan by selecting “yes” or “no” from the drop down menu. If you select “yes” you will be directed to Question 7.1a. If you select “no” you will be directed to Question 7.1b. Further to incorporating sustainability goals into the city’s master plan, this question explores whether your city has created a separate action plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This could for example include a plan for the local public transportation to cut GHG emissions by modernizing the bus fleet to hybrid vehicles. If you wish to see an example of a climate change action plan please refer to London’s which can be found here. Q 7.1a If yes: Please attach your city’s climate change action plan below. If you have a climate action plan please provide additional details about it in this question. Please indicate: Publication title State the official name of your city’s climate action plan. Year of publication Enter the year the plan was published as a numeric value. Attach Click on ‘Choose file’, navigate to the file you want to upload and click ‘Open’. Once you can see the file name in the text field click ‘Attach & Save’ to attach the document. Q 7.1b If no: Please describe any future plans to create a city climate change action plan. Since your city does not currently have a climate action plan, are you planning to establish one in the future? If so, please describe the areas of climate action already identified and likely to be incorporated into this plan. Q 7.2 Do you have a GHG emissions reduction target in place for your community? To respond to this question, please select “yes” or “no” from the drop-down menu. Please note this question applies to community emission reduction targets only. Local government operations emission reduction targets are addressed in the previous questions (6.0). Responding “yes” directs you to Question 7.0a; responding “no” directs you to Question 7.2b. Q 7.2a If yes: Please provide details of your city-wide emissions reduction target This question only applies if you have answered “yes” in Question 7.2. Please provide your response in the table provided under the following headings: Sector Please select total emissions in order to report the emissions reduction target for your total city-wide emissions inventory. If you have a sector breakdowns of your city-wide emissions reduction target, please add a row and select the relevant sector. Define target boundary Please define the boundary of the emissions source covered by your city-wide emissions reduction target. Your target may apply to your entire emissions inventory, or it may apply to a select group of emissions sources within your city-wide emissions. Please use sector names consistent with those used in your emissions inventory. Baseline year Page 57 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Please select the appropriate year from the drop down menu provided. Your baseline year (also known as a “base year” or “representative year”) is the reference year from which your greenhouse gas reductions are measured. Please ensure the baseline year corresponds to the total emissions inventory if Total is selected in column 1. If you are reporting a target for a specific sector of your local government inventory, please provide the baseline year for that sector. Baseline emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) Please enter the numerical value of your baseline emissions, without commas. Your baseline emissions are the greenhouse gas emissions from your baseline year on which your target is based. Please ensure the baseline emissions corresponds to the total emissions inventory if Total is selected in column 1. If you are reporting a target for a specific sector of your city-wide emissions inventory, please provide the baseline emissions for that sector. Please ensure that the baseline emissions correspond with the baseline year reported in column 2. Percentage reduction target Please enter the numerical value of your percentage reduction target, without commas and without the percentage symbol (%). If your target is not currently expressed as a percentage, please convert it into this format (for example an absolute emissions reduction in metric tonnes CO2e can be converted into a percentage reduction relative to the base year). If this is not possible, please note your target reduction and other relevant detail in the Comment column for this question. Target date Please select the year by which you anticipate achieving your goal from the drop down menu. You are able to select the years 2015, 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, 2045, 2050. If your target year is not in the list of values please select “other” and indicate it in the space provided. Comment Please provide any other contextualizing information about your reduction target in the Comment column. If your city has an intensity target (i.e. “emissions reductions relative to productivity or economic output, for instance, tons CO2/million dollars GDP”, as defined by the WRI) please provide details here. See next page for an example response. Page 58 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Box 15: Example GHG emissions target – Community Sector Define target Baseline boundary year Total All emissions 2002 within the municipality boundary Page 59 of 87 Baseline emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 6 000 000 Percentage reduction target Target date Comment 40 2030 In 2002, we set a target to reduce GHG emissions by 45% in 2030. This target applies to all the emission sources covered by our inventory: buildings, in-boundary transport and waste. 30% of all our emissions come from commercial buildings; we have therefore set an additional target to reduce emissions from this sector by at least 50%. @cdp | www.cdp.net Q 7.2b If no: Please explain why you do not have a city-wide emissions reduction target. This question only applies if you have answered “no” to Question 7.2. Please provide your response in the text box provided. This question offers you the opportunity to provide further information about your plans for emissions reduction. Q 7.3 What actions are you undertaking to reduce emissions city-wide? This question requests information about the efforts you are undertaking to reduce community-wide emissions. Emissions reduction activity Individual actions fall within a broader group of activity. The list of activities is provided in Appendix C of the questionnaire. Anticipated emissions reduction – cumulative over the lifetime of the action (metric tonnes CO2e) Please enter the numerical value of the total cumulative anticipated emissions reductions as a result of the action in metric tonnes CO2e without commas and without unit symbols. This can be an estimate. The anticipated emissions reduction – cumulative over the lifetime of the action estimates the total quantity of emissions saved over the lifetime of the energy saving measures installed. In the above example, if the average lifetime of the energy saving measures is assumed to be 10 years, then the cumulative reductions from this Action will be approximately 1,000,000 mtCO2e. In another example, City B plans to replace a coal-fired power station with several smaller gas-fired combined heat and power (CHP) plants in 2016. Once these are installed, and the coal-fired power station has been decommissioned, the CHP plants are expected to reduce emission by a combined total of 200,000 mtCO2e per year. The CHP plants are expected to operate for twenty years and thus the anticipated emissions reduction on a cumulative basis would be 4,000,000 mtCO2e. Action description The ORS provides a free text box for you to enter further information about your greenhouse gas reduction efforts. Text can be entered freely into this field but please keep this as concise as possible. Multiple entries can be made using the ‘Add Row’ button to the bottom right of the table. Renewable Energy Q 8.0 Please indicate the energy mix of your electricity at the city-wide scale. The goal of this question is to get a better understanding of the current energy mix of your electricity grid and the contribution made by renewable technologies at the city-wide scale. In the first column we have listed the most common sources of energy. Please indicate in the second column the percentage of each energy source constituting your energy mix, where it is applicable. Please ensure that the total percentage entered adds up to 100. If the energy source is not applicable to your electric grid please enter 0. Page 60 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Box 16: Example of energy mix for electricity Energy source Coal Percent 20 Gas 30 Oil 7 Nuclear 20 Hydro 0 Biomass 0 Wind 12 Geothermal 0 Solar 11 To prevent you from accidently entering incorrect figures we have added a validation rule to this question. If the sum of the percentages in column 2 is greater than 100, a warning message will pop up when the questionnaire is submitted. Q 8.1 Does your city have a renewable energy or electricity target? To respond to this question please select the dropdown that is most appropriate to your city: Yes – my city has a renewable ELECTRICITY target (directs you to Q 8.1a); Yes – my city has a renewable ENERGY target (directs you to Q 8.1b); Yes – my city has renewable electricity AND energy targets (directs you to Q 8.1a & Q 8.1b); No – my city does not have any renewable energy or electricity targets (directs you to Q 8.1c); In this context we differentiate energy from electricity as cities may have different targets for each. Q 8.1a Please provide details of your renewable electricity targets and how the city plans to meet those targets. This question will only apply if you have answered Yes – my city has a renewable electricity target or Yes – my city has renewable electricity and energy targets to question 8.1. The goal of this question is to understand the targets you have in place regarding renewable electricity in your city. Please provide your response in the table provided under the following headings: Scale Please select which scale your target applies to. This can either be for your local government operations only or for your community (please see Q 0.2 for definitions). Total installed capacity of renewable electricity (in MW) Please enter the numerical value of the projected installed capacity of renewable electricity. For example your target might be 500 MW of renewable electricity by 2020. Page 61 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Proportion of total electricity from renewable energy sources Please enter the percentage of the projected consumption of renewable electricity. For example your target might be 20% of your total electricity consumption met by renewable electricity by 2020. Target Date Please indicate the date by which you have set your renewable energy target. You are able to select the years 2015, 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, 2045, 2050. If your target year is not in the list of values please select “other” and indicate it in the space provided. Plans to meet target (include details on types of energy) Please be as specific as possible when describing how you are planning to reach your renewable electricity target and do not hesitate to mention or reference any plans or strategies developed to help deliver the target. Box 17: Example of renewable electricity target Scale Total Proportion of Target Date installed total electricity capacity of from renewable renewable electricity (in energy MW) sources Plans to meet target (include details on types of energy) City-wide 750 7.5 2025 We are conducting studies to determine where solar panels could be installed to optimize their production. In order to implement 750MW of solar power we plan to launch this in three phases. City-wide 300 3 2020 We are currently reviewing plans to either include hydropower or wind turbines. They will be installed after the solar panels. Add row Q 8.1b Please provide details of your renewable energy targets and how the city plans to meet those targets. This question will only apply if you have answered Yes – my city has a renewable energy target or Yes – my city has renewable electricity and energy targets. The goal of this question is to understand the targets you have in place regarding renewable energy in your city. Scale Please select which scale your target applies to. This can either be for your local government operations only or for your community (please see Q 0.2 for definitions). Page 62 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Total installed capacity of renewable energy (in MW) Please enter the numerical value of the total planed capacity of renewable energy target. For example your target might be 1000 MW of renewable electricity by 2020. Proportion of total electricity from renewable energy sources Please enter the percentage of the projected consumption of renewable electricity: either from locally produced electricity sources or purchased from the grid. For example your target might be 20% of your total electricity consumption met by renewable electricity by 2020. Target Date Please indicate the date by which you aim to reach your renewable energy target. From 2013-2020 you are able to select individual years, after 2020 you can select every 5 years period. Plans to meet target (include details on types of energy) Please be as specific as possible when describing how you are planning to reach your renewable energy target and mention or reference any plans or strategies developed to help deliver the target. Box 18: Example of renewable energy target Scale Total Proportion of Target Date installed total energy capacity of from renewable renewable energy (in energy MW) sources Plans to meet target (include details on types of energy) City-wide 1000 8 2025 As we are in a mountainous area we are planning to reach our target using hydro power. We are currently working with the private sector to build the necessary infrastructure including building a dam. Municipal 300 6 2015 We will be installing a combined heat and power generation unit in one of our municipal unit. The heat generated will be used for the building’s heating needs. Add row Q 8.1c Please explain why you do not have a renewable energy target or a renewable electricity target and any plans to introduce one in the future. [Text box] This question will only apply if you have answered No – my city does not have any renewable energy or electricity target to question 8.1. Please provide your response in the text box provided. This is your opportunity to provide further information about why your city does not have any renewable energy or electricity targets. Page 63 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Water Supply Risks Water is an issue of critical importance for city governments. Ensuring there is ample water for industry, agriculture and citizens can be an important responsibility of the municipal government. The following questions relate to the city’s water supply. Q 9.0 Do you foresee substantive risks to your city`s water supply in the short or long term? This question asks you to consider risks to the city’s water supply. These risks may or may not be caused or exacerbated by climate change. Consider risks that stem from physical impacts as well as those that may result from regulatory, economic or social settings. If you select “Yes” you will be directed to Questions 9.0a and 9.1. If you select “No” you will be directed to Question 9.0b. Q 9.0a If yes: Please identify the risks to your city’s water supply as well as the timescale and level of risk. This question is structured as a table. Multiple rows can be entered into the table using the ‘Add Row’ button to the bottom right of the table. Risks to water supply This question asks you to identify the risk to your water supply. The column provides a drop down list of options from which to select. The values are: Increased water stress or scarcity Declining water quality Inadequate or aging infrastructure Flooding Higher water prices Regulatory Other Timescale The table offers four choices for timescale: Current - if your city is already experiencing the identified risk to water supply. Short term - if you anticipate your city will experience the identified risk to water supply by 2025. Medium term - if you anticipate your city will experience the identified risk to water supply between 2026 and 2050. Long term - if you anticipate your city will experience the identified risk to water supply after 2051 Level of risk This question asks cities to assess the seriousness of the risks to their water supply. The categories of risk are general and the levels of seriousness are broad so cities should make choices based on their own assumptions or assessments. Three options are available to describe the level of risk: Extremely serious: If you anticipate the risk to your water supply poses the highest level of potential concern to your city. For example, you might choose this option if fresh water resources around your city are projected to be depleted in a short timeframe. Serious: If you anticipate that the expected effect of climate change to the risk to your water supply poses a significant level of concern to your city. For example, you might choose this Page 64 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net option if your city expects high costs or significant disruption of city operations due to water supply issues. Less serious: If you anticipate the risk to your water supply is of a lower level of concern. For example they may cause minor disruptions to city services, or reduce the ability to maintain sports fields. Risk description The final column of the table gives you an opportunity to comment on the risks you have identified. Q 9.0b Please explain why you do not consider your city to be exposed to any substantive waterrelated risk. This question is relevant only if you have answered “No” to question 9.0. This question gives you the opportunity to explain why your city does not face future risks to its water supply and your process for evaluating current or future risks. Water Supply Management Q 9.1 If you foresee risks to your city’s water supply, please select the actions you are taking to reduce the risks to your city’s water supply. This question is relevant only if you have answered “Yes” in Q 9.0. The purpose of this table is to understand the actions you are taking to reduce the risks to your water supply which you have identified in question 9.0a. Please note that this year the second column of the table is no longer a free text but has a list of values. Risks This column will be populated automatically with the answers you have given in question 9.0a. Adaptation action This column provides an opportunity to detail the adaptation action you are taking in relation to the water supply risk which you identified. If the adaptation action you are taking is not in the list provided please select “other” and specify your action. Action Description In this column, please provide any additional information about your adaptation action. Please see Box 19 as an example below for reference. Page 65 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Box 19: Examples of supply side risk management actions Risks Adaptation action Declining water quality Greenspace watershed preservation Page 66 of 87 Action description and In order to increase the water quality of the river we are ensuring that no pesticide is used in parks bordering water streams @cdp | www.cdp.net Compact of Mayors The Compact of Mayors module is 25 questions from the main questionnaire and 6 additional questions. By clicking the “Copy from last year” button on each page, you can copy your response from the twenty questions in the main questionnaire into the Compact of Mayors module. Questions M0.1, M1.4, M1.4a, M1.6b, M2.3b and M3.1b are the 6 additional questions and will not be copied over. Please note that attachments do not copy over, and will need to be re-attached to each question. Additional guidance on the Compact of Mayors module, including requirements is available here. The Compact of Mayors module can be submitted until 15 December, later than the CDP questionnaire. COM Overview M0.1 – Please attach your city’s letter of intent M0.2 – Copies from Q0.1 M0.3 – Copies from Q0.5 columns 1-4 M0.4 – Copies from Q0.6 columns 1-4 M0.5 – Copies from Q0.7 column 2 M0.6 – Copies from Q0.3 columns 1-5 M0.7 – Copies from Q0.4 columns 1-4 COM Emissions Inventory M1.0 – Copies from Q C1.0 M1.1 – Copies from Q C1.1 M1.2 – Copies from Q C1.2 column 1 M1.3 – Copies from Q C1.3 M1.4 – Please indicate if your city commits to reporting a GPC inventory M1.4a – Please indicate when your city will commit to reporting a GPC inventory M1.5 – Copies from Q C1.9a M1.5a – Please re-attach your city’s GHG emissions report COM Emissions Reduction M1.6 – Copies from Q7.1 M1.6a – Copies from Q7.1a columns 1, 2 and 4 (please re-attach your plan in column 3) M1.6b – Please complete the table to show where your action plan meets the key criteria M1.7 – Copies from Q7.2a columns 1-7 COM Climate Hazards M2.0 – Copies from Q2.1a M2.1 – Copies from Q2.1c M2.2 – Copies from Q2.1d M2.3 – Copies from Q2.0 M2.3a – Copies from Q2.0a (please re-attach your risk/vulnerability assessment in column 3) M2.3b – Please complete the table to show where you risk assessment meets the key criteria COM Adaptation M3.0 – Copies from Q3.1 M3.0a– Copies from Q3.1a columns 1 and 3 (please re-attach the commitment in column 2) M3.1 – Column 1 copies from Q3.2, in column 2 please select the type of plan M3.1a – Copies from Q3.2a column 1-2 and columns 4-6 (please re-attach your plan) M3.1b – Please complete the table to show where you plan meets the key criteria M3.2 – Please re-attach the completed template of additional questions Page 67 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Appendix 1 Glossary This glossary defines terms that may be unfamiliar to those responding to CDP for the first time. Definitions have been sourced from the GHG Protocol, CDP staff and the IPCC Assessment Reports. Accuracy Relative measure of the exactness of an emission or removal estimate. Adaptation The process of adjustment to actual or expected climate and its effects. In human systems, adaptation sees to moderate harm or exploit beneficial opportunities. British thermal unit (Btu or BTU) The British thermal unit is a unit of heat energy equivalent to 1.055 KJoules. 1 Therm is equivalent to 100,000 Btus. Climate adaptation plan A climate adaptation plan outlines the planned alterations to the city’s systems in response to actual or anticipated climate change. It should cover the services and departments directly managed by the city government and may also consider the actions required by other stakeholders3. The aim of such a plan is to ensure that climate change risks are addressed in a preventive manner by putting in place a set of concrete measures to tackle those risks Climate change action plan A climate change action lays out a strategy, including specific policy recommendations, that a … [city] will use to address climate change and reduce its greenhouse gas emissions.4 Climate Hazard The potential occurrence of dangerous climate-related physical events or trends, that may cause loss of life, injury or other health impacts, as well as damage and loss to property, infrastructure, livelihoods, service provision, and environmental resources. Community Inventory See Emissions Inventory 3 Based on the glossary document of the IPCC IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Barros, V.R., C.B. Field, D.J. Dokken, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee,K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 688. 4 The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As seen on http://www.epa.gov/statelocalclimate/state/stateexamples/action-plans.html on 22 January 2014 Page 68 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Consolidation approach The identification of departments, facilities, operations etc. for inclusion within the reporting boundary (see definition of reporting boundary below) of the responding city is known as the “consolidation approach”. The way in which you report information for the cities that are included within the reporting boundary is known as the “consolidation approach” because, unless stated otherwise, the information you provide in response to the questionnaire should be presented as one “consolidated” result covering all of the departments, facilities, operations etc within your reporting boundary. The GHG Protocol, for example, states that two distinct approaches may be used to consolidate GHG emissions; the equity share and the control approaches. Control can be defined in either financial (financial control) or operational (operational control) terms. Conversion to US Dollars Cities are requested to provide financial data in US Dollars to aid comparability. For assistance in converting from local currency to US dollars, see http://www.oanda.com/currency/converter/ . Select the 31st December 2014 as the DATE and the Interbank rate from the RATE drop down box. Emission factor An emission factor is a unique value for scaling emissions to activity data in terms of a standard rate of emissions per unit of activity (e.g., grams of CO2 emitted per liter of fossil fuel consumed). Emission factors allow GHG emissions to be estimated from a unit of available activity data. Emissions factors are sometimes referred to as emission conversion factors. Emissions inventory An emissions inventory describes the collation of GHG data for an established reporting boundary. Two different emissions inventories can be applied to cities: Local Government Operations Inventory – relates to emissions arising from the operations of the local government. This can also be referred to as a Government Operations, Corporate or Municipality Inventory. Community Inventory – relates to emissions that fall within a specific geopolitical boundary. This can also be referred to as a Geographic or City-wide Inventory. The Local Government Operations Inventory is a subset of the Community Inventory. Emissions reduction activity Grouping of similar actions, such as the actions of Minimum Density Requirements and Promotion of High Density Offices which belong to the activity of Compact Cities. Energy type Energy includes electricity, heat, steam and cooling. Cooling is included in this list because when cooling services are purchased using a district system, the compressor system that produces the cooling may be driven by either electricity or fossil fuel combustion. Energy units Fuel can be measured in terms of its: Energy content e.g. in kilojoules (kJ), British thermal units (Btu), or therms; Volume e.g. in m3 or liters; and Mass e.g. in metric tonnes or short tons. Financial control An organization has financial control over an operation where it has the ability to direct the financial and operating policies of that operation with a view to gaining economic benefits from its activities. Generally an organization has financial control over an operation for GHG accounting purposes if the operation is treated as a group company or subsidiary for the purposes of financial consolidation. Fuel type Page 69 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Fuel types include: natural gas; types of coal or coal-derived fuels, such as anthracite, coking coal, coal tar; types of biomass and biofuel; crude oil and crude oil-derived substances, such as residual fuel oil, motor gasoline (petrol), and diesel. A list of fuel definitions is provided in Appendix A2. Fugitive emissions Intentional and unintentional releases such as equipment leaks from joint, seals, packing, gaskets, as well as fugitive emissions from coal piles, wastewater treatment, pits, cooling towers, gas processing facilities, etc. Geographical Information System (GIS) A geographic information system (GIS), geographical information system, or geospatial information system is any system that captures, stores, analyzes, manages, and presents data that are linked to location. GJ A Gigajoule (GJ) is equal to one billion (109) joules. A joule is the SI unit of work or energy, equal to the work done by a force of one newton when its point of application moves through a distance of one meter in the direction of the force. GHG type There are various types of greenhouse gases, but the information request focuses on reporting of the six GHGs covered by the Kyoto Protocol plus one addition: Carbon dioxide (CO2); Methane (CH4); Nitrous oxide (N20); Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) family of gases; Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) family of gases; and Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3). Global warming potential (GWP) The GHG Protocol defines a global warming potential (GWP) as “A factor describing the radiative forcing impact (degree of harm to the atmosphere) of one unit of a given GHG relative to one unit of CO2.” By using GWPs, GHG emissions can be standardized to a carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). GWPs allow the effect of different GHGs to be expressed using carbon dioxide as a reference. For example, the impact on the atmosphere of one unit of methane over a 100-year time span is 21 times greater than one unit of CO2 (according to the IPCC’s second assessment report). Hence, methane’s global warming potential (GWP) over a 100-year period is 21. Estimates of GWPs have changed over time as scientific understanding has developed. However, for the sake of consistency, the parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change are continuing to use the GWPs from the Second Assessment Report (“SAR”) from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. As the GWPs from the SAR are used as the basis for international negotiations under the Kyoto Protocol, CDP also recommends that they be used for disclosing GHG emissions in response to the CDP information request. For those gases not assigned a GWP in the SAR, please use the latest GWPs given in the Fourth Assessment Report. Please explain the source of the GWPs you are using. The Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) gives the latest GWP values as well as GWPs from the SAR. Go to table 2.14, page 212, in Chapter 2 of Working Group 1’s report, available from the IPCC website. Page 70 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net GWPs are expressed over a number of different time frames. Please use the factors that give the GWP over a 100-year time span. For gases without a value in the SAR column, please use the 100-year value in the seventh column of table 2.14. Grid average emissions factor The grid average factor represents the relative contributions that different types of electrical generation make to electricity available from the grid and their associated emission rates. Gross emissions Gross means total emissions before any deductions or other adjustments are made to take account of GHG mitigation activities, offset credits, renewable energy certificates, avoided emissions from the use of goods and services and/or reductions attributable to the sequestration or transfer of GHGs. GWh The gigawatt hour (GWh) is a unit of energy equal to one billion (109) watt hours. The GWh is commonly used in metering electrical use in large installations such as industrial plants and in power generation. Inventory See Emissions Inventory Local Government Operations Inventory See Emissions Inventory kWh The kilowatt hour (kWh) is a unit of energy equal to one thousand (103) watt hours. The kWh is commonly used in metering electrical use in residential properties. Master Plan A master plan describes and maps an overall development concept, including present and future land use, urban design and landscaping, built form, infrastructure, circulation and service provision. It is based upon an understanding of place and it is intended to provide a structured approach to creating a clear and consistent framework for development.5 Metric tonne A metric tonne is equivalent to 2,204.6lbs. The “long ton”, a term generally used in Britain, is equivalent to 2,240lbs and the “short ton” is generally used in the USA and is equivalent to 2,000 lbs. Metric tonne of CO2 A metric tonne of carbon dioxide. Please note that a metric tonne is equivalent to 2,204.6lbs. The “long ton”, a term generally used in Britain, is equivalent to 2,240lbs and the “short ton” is generally used in the USA and is equivalent to 2,000 lbs. Metric tonne of CO2e Emissions under the “scopes” must be reported in metric tonnes of CO2e: CO2e stands for carbon dioxide equivalent. A metric tonne of CO2e means one metric tonne of carbon dioxide or an amount of any of the other GHGs with an equivalent global warming potential. Methodology/method The set of instructions that enable a GHG calculation to be made and repeated in a consistent manner, irrespective of the person performing the calculation. 2 The Scottish Government. As seen on http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2008/11/10114526/2 on 14 November 2012. Page 71 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net MJ A Megajoule (MJ) is equal to one million (106) joules. A joule is the SI unit of work or energy, equal to the work done by a force of one newton when its point of application moves through a distance of one meter in the direction of the force. Mobile combustion Mobile combustion: mobile units that combust (consume) fuels e.g. transport vehicles or mobile equipment such as cranes and tractors. MWh The Megawatt hour (MWh) is a unit of energy equal to one million (106) watt hours. The MWh is commonly used in metering electrical use in large installations such as industrial plants and in power generation. Operational control Operational control is one of the control approaches that can be used to consolidate and report GHG emissions. A city has operational control of another company if it, or one of its subsidiaries, has the full authority to introduce and implement its operating policies at the company. Opportunities Opportunities can arise from climate change due to changes in physical and/or social/regulatory conditions. This can lead to improvements in living, working or economic conditions for the local government and the city’s inhabitants. Process Generally the term “process” implies the means, framework or policy by which a city identifies risks and/or opportunities. This process is likely to differ from city to city and may consist of one or more of the following: An internal system of risk management applied throughout the city to identify operational risks and opportunities (including those associated with climate change); A process dedicated solely to the identification of risks and opportunities associated solely with climate change; and A process that forms part of the city’s overall approach to governance and/or compliance. Protocol A record of an agreement, especially one reached through international negotiations. For the purposes of the information request, it means an agreed system for accounting for GHG emissions e.g. the GHG Protocol. Risk The potential for consequences when something of human value (including humans themselves) is at stake and where the outcome is uncertain. Risk is the probability of a hazardous event or trend, multiplied by the consequence if this event occurs. Reporting boundary Your reporting boundary represents the owned and/or controlled group, , departments, companies, businesses or organizations to which your response relates, determined by reference to your chosen “consolidation approach”. References in the information request to “your city” are to the group, company, companies, businesses or organizations within your reporting boundary for each individual inventory (local government operations or community). Page 72 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net The way in which you identify the bodies that are included within the reporting boundary is known as the “consolidation approach” because unless stated otherwise, the information you provide in response to the information request should be presented as one “consolidated” result covering all of the entities within your reporting boundary. Reporting year The latest 12-month period for which emissions data has been calculated. Any start or end date may be selected for your reporting year as long as it encompasses a full 12 months. Where insufficient data is available cities are requested to extrapolate to cover the full 12 month period. However, the end date for the reporting period should not be in the future. Renewable energy CDP follows the definition of renewable energy given in the GHG Protocol: “Energy taken from sources that are inexhaustible, e.g. wind, water, solar, geothermal energy and biofuels.” Scope 1 GHG emissions All direct GHG emissions (with the exception of direct CO2 emissions from biogenic sources). Scope 2 GHG emissions These emissions do not physically occur from within the organization’s reporting boundary and are therefore “indirect” emissions. They are associated with the consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, steam, heating, or cooling. Scope 3 GHG emissions They are from sources that are not owned or controlled by the reporting entity but which occur as a result of its activities. As such, Scope 3 comprises all other indirect emissions not covered in Scope 2, such as emissions resulting from the extraction and production of purchased materials and fuels, transport-related activities in vehicles not owned or controlled by the reporting entity (e.g., employee commuting and business travel), outsourced activities, waste disposal, etc. Short ton A short ton is a unit of weight generally used in the USA and is equivalent to 2,000lbs. This differs from a metric tonne which is equivalent to 2,204.6lbs and The “long ton”, a term generally used in Britain, is equivalent to 2,240lbs. Significance Significance can only be determined within the context of a specific city. It will depend on the sectors and regulatory regimes in which the city operates. For example, a numerically small variation may be significant if it brings a city operation within the scope of regulatory requirement. Except where otherwise stated, we therefore ask cities to use their judgment to evaluate significance. Standard In the context of the CDP information request, a standard refers to a widely-accepted GHG accounting methodology such as the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard or ISO 14064-1. Stationary combustion Fixed units for on-site combustion of fuels e.g. boilers, turbines, ovens, incinerators, dryers, etc. Therm (thm) The therm is a unit of heat energy equivalent to 100,000 British therm units (Btu). TJ Page 73 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net A Terajoule (TJ) is equal to one trillion (1012) joules. A joule is the SI unit of work or energy, equal to the work done by a force of one newton when its point of application moves through a distance of one meter in the direction of the force. Uncertainty Statistical definition: A parameter associated with the result of a measurement that characterizes the dispersion of the values that could be reasonable attributed to the measured quantity (e.g., the sample variance or coefficient of variation). Inventory definition: A general and imprecise term which refers to the lack of certainty in emissionsrelated data resulting from any causal factor, such as the application of non-representative factors or methods, incomplete data on sources and sinks, lack of transparency etc. Reported uncertainty information typically specifies a quantitative estimate of the likely or perceived difference between a reported value and a qualitative description of the likely causes of the difference. Verification A verification exercise is a review process, conducted by an independent or third party, of all or part of the information disclosed to CDP. The verification exercise, or process of review, leads to the independent or third party being able to provide the intended users of information with an opinion about whether the information concerned is presented fairly and accurately. Zero or low carbon electricity Certain methods of generating electricity do not emit GHGs or emit relatively low amounts of GHGs compared with other forms of electricity generation (although GHGs are emitted during other phases of their lifecycle, such as in the manufacture, installation and/or maintenance of the generator). Examples of zero or low carbon electricity include nuclear generation and electricity generated by wind, water, solar and geothermal heat. For the purpose of the information request, these methods are referred to as zero or low carbon methods of generation. Page 74 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Appendix 2 Fuel Definitions All fuels listed in Appendix B of the questionnaire have been defined below. The definitions are taken from the WRI Greenhouse Gas Protocol Stationary Combustion Tool, Version 4.0. SOLID FOSSIL FUELS Bitumen A dark brown-to-black cement-like material obtained by petroleum processing and containing bitumens as the predominant component; used primarily for road construction. It includes crude asphalt as well as the following finished products: cements, fluxes, the asphalt content of emulsions (exclusive of water), and petroleum distillates blended with asphalt to make cutback asphalts. This category includes fluidized and cut back bitumen. See tar sand. Coal (Anthracite ) Anthracite is a high rank coal used for industrial and residential applications. It has generally less than 10% volatile matter and a high carbon content (about 90% fixed carbon). Its gross calorific value is greater than 23,865 kJ/kg (5,700 kcal/kg) on an ash-free but moist basis. Coal (Bituminous or Black coal) A dense coal, usually black, sometimes dark brown, often with well-defined bands of bright and dull material, used primarily as fuel in steam-electric power generation, with substantial quantities also used for heat and power applications in manufacturing and to make coke. Coking coal Coking coal refers to bituminous coal with a quality that allows the production of a coke suitable to support a blast furnace charge. Its gross calorific value is greater than 23,865 kJ/kg (5,700 kcal/kg) on an ash-free but moist basis. Petroleum coke A black solid residue, obtained mainly by cracking and carbonizing of residue feedstocks, tar and pitched in processes such as delayed coking or fluid coking. It consists mainly of carbon (90 to 95%) and has a low ash content. It is used as a feedstock in coke ovens for the steel industry, for heating purposes, for electrode manufacture and for production of chemicals. The two most important qualities are “green coke” and “calcinated coke”. This category also includes “catalyst coke” deposited on the catalyst during refining processes: this coke is not recoverable and is usually burned as refinery fuel. Waste Municipal (Non-biomass fraction) Non-biomass fraction of municipal waste includes waste produced by households, industry, hospitals and the tertiary sector which are incinerated at specific installation and are used for energy purposes. Only the fraction of the fuel that is non-biodegradable should be included here. LIQUID FOSSIL FUELS Page 75 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Aviation gasoline Aviation gasoline is motor spirit prepared especially for aviation piston engines, with an octane number suited to the engine, a freezing point of -60°C and a distillation range usually within the limits of 30°C and 180°C. Crude oil Crude oil is a mineral oil consisting of a mixture of hydrocarbons of natural origin, being yellow to black in color, of variable density and viscosity. It also includes lease condensate (separator liquids), which are recovered from gaseous hydrocarbons in lease separating facilities. Distillate fuel oil A general classification for one of the petroleum fractions produced in conventional distillation operations. It includes fuels and fuel oils. Distillate fuel oil No. 1: A light petroleum distillate that can be used as either a diesel fuel or a fuel oil. Distillate fuel oil No. 2: A petroleum distillate that can be used as either a diesel fuel or a fuel oil. Distillate fuel oil No. 4: A fuel oil made by blending distillate fuel oil and residual fuel oil stocks. Distillate fuel oil No. 5 see Residual fuel oil Distillate fuel oil No. 6 see Residual fuel oil Diesel/ Gas oil Gas/diesel oil includes heavy gas oils. Gas oils are obtained from the lowest fraction from atmospheric distillation of crude oil, while heavy gas oils are obtained by vacuum redistillation of the residual from atmospheric distillation. Gas/diesel oil distils between 180°C and 380°C. Several grades are available depending on uses: diesel oil for diesel compression ignition (cars, trucks, marine, etc.), light heating oil for industrial and commercial uses and other gas oil including heavy gas oils which distil between 380°C and 540°C and are used as petrochemical feedstocks. Jet gasoline This includes all light hydrocarbon oils for use in aviation turbine power units. They distil between 100°C and 250°C. It is obtained by blending kerosenes and gasoline or naphthas in such a way that the aromatic content does not exceed 25% in volume, and the vapor pressure is between 13.7 kPa and 20.6 kPa. Additives can be included to improve stability and combustibility. Jet kerosene This is medium distillate used for aviation turbine power units. It has the same distillation characteristics and flash point as kerosene (between 150°C and 300°C but not generally above 250°C). In addition, it has particular specifications (such as freezing point) which are established by the International Air Transport Association (IATA). Motor gasoline (petrol) This is light hydrocarbon oil for use in internal combustion engines such as motor vehicles, excluding aircraft. Motor gasoline in distilled between 35°C and 215°C and is used as a fuel for land based spark ignition engines. Motor gasoline may include additives, oxygenated and octane enhancers, including lead compounds such as TEL (Tetraethyl lead) and TML (Tetramethyl lead). Naphtha Naphtha is a feedstock destined either for the petrochemical industry (e.g. ethylene manufacture or aromatics production) or for gasoline production by reforming or isomerization within the refinery. Naphtha comprises material in the 30°C and 210°C distillation range or part of this range. Pitch Any various thick, dark, sticky substances obtained from the distillation residue of coal tar, wood tar or petroleum and used for waterproofing, roofing, caulking, and paving. Page 76 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Residual fuel oil This heading defines oils that make up the distillation residue. It comprises all residual fuel oils, including those obtained by blending. Its kinematic viscosity is above 0.1cm2 at 80°C. The flash point is always above 50°C and the density is always more than 0.90kg/l. Includes Distillate fuel oil No. 5 and Distillate fuel oil No. 6. GASEOUS FOSSIL FUELS Butane A normally gaseous straight-chain or branch-chain hydrocarbon extracted from natural gas or refinery gas streams. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) CNG is natural gas for use in special CNG vehicles, where it is stored in high-pressure fuel cylinders (typically 2000 to 3600 psi). CNG's use stems in part from its clean burning properties, as it produces fewer exhaust and greenhouse gas emissions than motor gasoline or diesel oil. It is used most frequently in light-duty passenger vehicles and pickup trucks, medium-duty delivery trucks, and in transit and school buses. Kerosene A petroleum distillate that has a maximum distillation temperature of 401 degrees Fahrenheit (205 degrees Celsius) at the 10% recovery point, a final boiling point of 572 degrees Fahrenheit (300 degrees Celsius) and a minimum flash point of 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Comprises refined petroleum distillate intermediate in volatility between gasoline and gas/diesel oil. Used in space heaters, cookstoves, and water-heaters and suitable for use as an illuminant when burned in wick lamps. Liquefied petroleum gases (LPG) These are the light hydrocarbons fraction of the paraffin series, derived from refinery processes, crude oil stabilization plants and natural gas processing plants comprising propane (C3H8) and butane (C4H10) or a combination of the two. They are normally liquefied under pressure for transportation and storage. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) Natural gas cooled to approximately -160°C (-256°F) under atmospheric pressure condenses to its liquid form called LNG. LNG is odorless, colorless, non-corrosive and non-toxic. Methane A hydrocarbon that is a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential recently estimated to be 21 times higher than CO2 over a 100 year time frame. Methane is produced through anaerobic (without oxygen) decomposition of waste landfills, animal digestion, decomposition of animal wastes, production and distribution of natural gas and petroleum, coal production and incomplete fossil fuel combustion. Natural gas Natural gas should include: (1) Blended natural gas (sometimes also referred to as Town Gas or City Gas), a high calorific value obtained as a blend of natural gas with other gases; (2) City Gas, a high calorific value gas obtained as a blend of natural gas with other gases derived from other primary products, and usually distributed through the natural gas grid (e.g. coal seam methane); (3) Substitute natural gas, a high calorific value gas, manufactured by chemical conversion of a hydrocarbon fossil fuel, where the main raw materials are: natural gas, coal, oil and oil shale. Propane A normally gaseous straight-chain hydrocarbon. It is a colorless paraffinic gas that boils at a temperature of -43.67°F (-42.04°C). It is extracted from natural gas or refinery gas streams. Page 77 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Town gas or city gas Natural gas should include blended natural gas (sometimes also referred to as Town Gas or City Gas), a high calorific value gas obtained as a blend of natural gas with other gases derived from other primary products, and usually distributed through the natural gas grid (e.g. coal seam methane). Blended natural gas should include substitute natural gas, a high calorific value gas, manufactured by chemical conversion of a fossil fuel, where the main raw materials are: natural gas, coal, oil and oil shale. BIOMASS Biodiesels Biodiesels should only contain that part of the fuel that relates to the quantities of biofuel and not to the total volume of liquids into which the biofuels are blended. This category includes biodiesel (a methylester produced from vegetable or animal oil, of diesel quality), biodimethylether (dimethylether produced from biomass), fischer tropsh (fischer tropsh produced from biomass), cold pressed bio oil (oil produced from oil seed through mechanical processing only) and all other liquid biofuels which are added to, blended with or used straight as transport diesel. Biogas A gas composed principally of methane (50-60%) and carbon dioxide produced by anaerobic digestion of biomass, comprising: Landfill gas, formed by the digestion of landfill wastes; Sewage sludge gas, produced from the anaerobic fermentation of sewage sludge; Other biogas, such as biogas produced from the anaerobic fermentation of animal slurries and of wastes in abattoirs, breweries and other agro-food industries Biogasoline Biogasoline should only contain that part of the fuel that relates to the quantities of biofuel and not to the total volume of liquids into which biofuels are blended. This category includes bioethanol (ethanol produced from biomass and/or the biodegradable fraction of waste), biomethanol (methanol produced from biomass and/or the biodegradable fraction of waste), bioETBE (ethyl-tertio-butyl-ether produced on the basis of bioethanol: the percentage by volume of bioETBE that is calculate as biofuel is 47%) and bioMTBE (methyl-tertio-butyl-ether produced on the basis of biomethanol: the percentage by volume or bioMTBE that is calculated as biofuel is 36%). Ethanol Otherwise known as ethyl alcohol, alcohol, or grain spirit. A clear, colorless, flammable oxygenated hydrocarbon with a boiling point of 78.5 degrees Celsius (173.3 degrees Fahrenheit) in the anhydrous state. Ethanol is typically produced chemically from ethylene, or biologically from fermentation of various sugars from carbohydrates found in agricultural crops and cellulosic residues from crops or wood. In transportation, ethanol is used as a vehicle fuel by itself (E100), blended with gasoline (E85), or as a gasoline octane enhancer and oxygenate (10 percent concentration). E85 A blend of 15 percent gasoline and 85 percent denatured ethanol by volume. Landfill gas Landfill gas is derived from the anaerobic fermentation of biomass and solid wastes in landfills and may be combusted to produce heat and/or power. Wood or Wood waste Page 78 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Wood and wood waste combusted directly for energy. This category also includes wood for charcoal production but not the actual production of charcoal (this would be double counting since charcoal is a secondary product). Page 79 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Appendix 3 Conversion of Electricity, Heat, Steam and Cooling data to MWh Electricity If you do not have data on purchased electricity in MWh, it can readily be converted from kWh or GWh into MWh. To convert from kWh to MWh, divide the figure by 1000. To convert from GWh to MWh, multiply the figure by 1000. Heat and steam Heat and steam may be bought in British thermal units (Btu), joules (J), and therms, which can be converted to MWh using a calculation tool such as www.onlineconversion.com. Heat is also sometimes bought in kWh, making conversion to MWh straightforward. Steam may also be bought in units of pounds. Conversion is more difficult as the energy content of the steam varies with temperature and pressure. We would refer organizations to The Climate Registry’s General Reporting Protocol. Chapter 15, section 15.2, step 1 explains how to calculate the energy content of steam. Cooling This is frequently bought in refrigeration-ton hours. 1 ton-hour=12,000 Btu=0.003516 MWh. Conversion of fuel data to MWh Some questions in the ORS ask for energy and fuel inputs to be reported according to standardized units commonly used for measuring electricity consumption, i.e.: MWh. Energy and fuel inputs mean the energy content of: Fuels before combustion in operations/assets within your reporting boundary; and The amount of purchased energy inputs which include electricity, heat, steam and cooling for use by those operations/assets. This section of the Appendix provides guidance on how to convert fuel data to MWh. Fuel can be measured in terms of: Energy content e.g. in kilojoules (kJ), British thermal units (Btu) or therms; o Volume e.g. in m3 or liters; and o Mass e.g. in metric tonnes or short tons. The way in which fuel data may be converted to MWh depends upon whether information about fuel is expressed in terms of energy content, volume or mass and guidance on conversion for each measurement is set out below. For fuel inputs, we ask for the energy content of fuels prior to combustion. o Please include in your calculations the energy content of any biomass and self-produced fuels that you use for stationary combustion. Self-produced fuels are fuels produced by Page 80 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net assets or activities within your reporting boundary that are combusted for energy generation. This is common in the oil and gas sector, e.g. refinery fuel gas, associated gas, etc. If you have your fuel data in an energy unit, you can convert it to MWh using a conversion tool such as: www.onlineconversion.com If your fuel data is in units of volume or mass and you know the energy content of your fuel 1. If your fuel consumption is measured by volume or mass you need to obtain the energy content of the fuel in corresponding units, e.g. kJ/liter, kJ/m3, kJ/metric tonne. This is usually called the calorific value or heating value. It may be obtained from your fuel supplier or you may have your own values generated by your own tests. 2. Multiply the fuel volume or mass by the calorific value (or heating value) in the appropriate units i.e. if the fuel data is in metric tonnes, then the calorific value must be expressed in energy units per metric tonnes. This gives you the energy content of the fuel used. 3. Take the resulting figure and convert it to MWh using a conversion tool. If your fuel data is in units of volume or mass and you do not know the energy content of the fuel If you cannot obtain a calorific value (or heating value) specific to the fuel you purchase, default heating values may be used. Default heating values are reproduced below from the GHG Protocol’s stationary combustion Excel spreadsheet 3.1(1). Please note: These default values are meant only to provide guidance for users who are developing their own values. Users are encouraged to develop their own values based on the actual characteristics of the fuel being combusted. The GHG Protocol has produced a new tool version 4.0. Its simpler and clearer user interface means that some reference data such as the figures below are no longer visible. Higher Heating Values (HHV) / Gross Calorific Values (GCV) units TJ/Gg Lower Heating Values (LHV) / Net Calorific Values (NCV) units TJ/Gg 44.53 42.3 28.95 27.5 46.53 44.2 Motor Gasoline 46.63 44.3 Aviation Gasoline 46.63 44.3 Jet Gasoline 46.63 44.3 Jet Kerosene 46.42 44.1 Other Kerosene 46.11 43.8 Shale oil 40.11 38.1 Gas/Diesel oil 45.26 43 Residual Fuel oil 42.53 40.4 Fuel Type Crude oil & Crude oil derived substances Orimulsion Natural Gas Liquids Page 81 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Higher Heating Values (HHV) / Gross Calorific Values (GCV) units TJ/Gg Lower Heating Values (LHV) / Net Calorific Values (NCV) units TJ/Gg Liquefied Petroleum Gases 49.79 47.3 Ethane 48.84 46.4 Naphtha 46.84 44.5 Bitumen 42.32 40.2 Lubricants 42.32 40.2 Petroleum coke 34.21 32.5 Refinery feedstocks 45.26 43 Refinery Gas 55.00 49.5 Paraffin waxes 42.32 40.2 White Spirit & SBP 42.32 40.2 Other petroleum products 42.32 40.2 28.11 26.7 29.68 28.2 27.16 25.8 Sub-bituminous coal 19.89 18.9 Lignite 12.53 11.9 Oil shale and tar sands 9.37 8.9 Brown coal briquettes 21.79 20.7 Patent fuel 21.79 20.7 Coke oven coke & lignite coke 29.68 28.2 Gas coke 29.68 28.2 Coal tar 29.47 28 Gas works gas 43.00 38.7 Coke oven gas 43.00 38.7 Blast furnace gas 2.74 2.47 Oxygen steel furnace gas 7.84 7.06 Natural gas Natural Gas 53.33 48 Nonbiomass waste fuels Municipal wastes (non-biomass fraction) 10.53 10 Industrial wastes NA NA Waste oils 42.32 40.2 Peata 10.27 9.76 Fuel Type Coal & Anthracite derived substances Coking coal Other bituminous coal Peat Page 82 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Higher Heating Values (HHV) / Gross Calorific Values (GCV) units TJ/Gg Lower Heating Values (LHV) / Net Calorific Values (NCV) units TJ/Gg Wood/Wood waste 16.42 15.6 Sulphite lyes (Black liquor) 12.42 11.8 Other primary solid biomass fuels 12.21 11.6 Charcoal 31.05 29.5 Biogasoline 28.42 27 Biodiesels 28.42 27 Other liquid biofuels 28.84 27.4 Landfill gasb 56.00 50.4 Sludge gasb 56.00 50.4 Other biogas 56.00 50.4 Municipal wastes (biomass fraction) 12.21 11.6 Fuel Type Biomass fuels Please note that the heating values in Table 1 are given in units of TJ/Gg, where the prefixes T and G stand for “tera” and “giga” and correspond respectively to multiplication factors of 10 12 and 109. When using the tabulated values for heating values, please ensure that your fuel use figures are in the correct units. If your fuel measurements are in units of mass 1. If your figures are already in metric units of mass, convert them to Gg or Giga grams. The online converter has a webpage that can be used to convert between different metric units. The website can also be used to convert to Gg if your figures are in other units of mass e.g. short tons and pounds. 2. Select the appropriate default calorific value (or heating value) from Table 1 above and multiply it by your mass figure in Gg. The resulting figure will be in TJ. 3. Convert to MWh using the online converter. If your fuel measurements are in units of volume 1. If your fuels are gases or liquids and are in units of volume, convert to units of mass. To do this, organizations will need to know the density of the fuel. Organizations are encouraged to develop their own values based on the actual characteristics of the fuel being combusted. However, if you do not have density data specific to your fuel, you could use default density values from Table 2 below which was sourced from the GHG Protocol stationary combustion spreadsheet version 3.1(1). 2. Multiply the units of volume by the appropriate density values from Table 2 below to convert them to units of mass. Check that you are using the appropriate conversion factors i.e. if your data is in cubic feet do not use the conversion factor for cubic meters; use the conversion factor for cubic feet. Page 83 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net 3. Convert the data into Gg or Giga grams. The online converter has a webpage that can be used to convert between different metric units. The conversion calculator can also be used to convert to Gg if your figures are in other units of mass e.g. short tons and pounds. 4. Select the appropriate default calorific value (or heating value) from Table 1 above and multiply it by your mass figure in Gg. The resulting figure will be in TJ. 5. Convert to MWh using the online converter. Gaseous (kg/m3)a,b Liquid (kg/L)b Gaseous (lb/ft3)a,b Liquid (lb/gal)b Range Typical Range Range Typical Range Typical Natural gas 0.6-0.9 0.7 0.037-0.055 0.043 Natural gas (dry) 0.6-0.9 0.7 0.037-0.056 0.043 Methane - 0.67 - 0.042 Ethane - 1.3 - 0.079 Propane - 1.9 - 0.12 Butane - 2.5 - 0.16 Isobutane - 2.5 - 0.16 n-Butane - 2.5 - 0.16 Fuel Type Typical Coal-based fuels Anthracite coal Bituminous coal Sub-bituminous coal Lignite coal Coal coke Patent fuel BKB Natural gas-based fuelsc Natural gas liquids (LNG) 0.42-0.54 0.47 3.5-4.5 3.9 Crude oil 0.7-0.9 0.8 5.8-7.5 6.7 Motor gasoline / petrol 0.73-0.76 0.74 6.1-6.3 6.2 Aviation gasoline 0.7-0.72 0.71 5.8-6.0 5.9 Distillate Oil 0.82-0.95 0.84 6.8-7.9 7.0 Distillate fuel oil No.1 0.82-0.85 0.84 6.8-7.1 7.0 Distillate fuel oil No.2 0.82-0.85 0.85 6.8-7.1 7.1 Distillate fuel oil No.4 0.91-0.95 0.93 7.6-7.9 7.8 Residual Oil 0.93-1.03 0.94 7.8-8.6 7.8 Residual fuel oil No.5 0.93-0.95 0.94 7.8-7.9 7.8 Residual fuel oil No.6 0.89-1.01 0.94 7.4-8.5 7.8 Jet kerosene 0.76-0.83 0.79 6.3-6.9 6.6 Kerosene (other) 0.79-0.82 0.80 6.6-6.8 6.7 LPG 0.53-0.55 0.54 4.5-4.6 4.5 Naphtha 0.75-0.82 0.77 6.3-6.8 6.4 Petroleum-based fuels Petroleum Coke Asphalt / bitumen Pitch Page 84 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Fuel Type Gaseous (kg/m3)a,b Liquid (kg/L)b Gaseous (lb/ft3)a,b Liquid (lb/gal)b Range Range Typical Range Range Typical 0.8-1.1 1.0 6.7-9.2 8.3 0.96-1.00 1.0 8.0-8.3 8.3 Typical Lubricants Typical Waxes Shale oil (liquid) Oil shale Other Fuels Peat Waste plastics Tar Waste tire derived fuels Biomass Wood (dry) Wood (wet) Fuelwood (approx. 20% moisture) Black liquor Landfill gas 0.67-1.2 0.9 0.042-0.075 0.056 Waste water treatment biogas 0.67-1.2 0.9 0.042-0.076 0.056 Biodiesel 0.96-1.00 0.85 6.9-7.2 7.0 Turpentine - 0.87 - 7.2 Vegetable oils 0.96-1.00 0.90 7.4-7.5 7.5 a) Density values are highly sensitive to changes in temperature and pressure. Values indicated are based on room temperature and standard atmospheric pressure. b) Dry unless otherwise noted. c) At room temperature and standard atmospheric pressure. Source: World Resources Institute/World Business Council for Sustainable Development stationary combustion calculation tool version 3.3(1) Typical values are based on a compilation of commonly accepted sources such as US DOE/EIA, national inventory reports to the UNFCCC and other sources. More detailed conversions of fuel data to MWh can be found in the CDP – Technical note document. Page 85 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Appendix 4 Resources and Reports Below you can find a list of supporting materials which may be helpful to you when filling out the questionnaire. Risks Cities Preparing for Climate Change: A Study of Six Urban Regions by the Clean Air Partnership (Canada). Coping with Global Climate Change, The Role of Adaptation in the United States by the Pew Center on Global Climate. IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Full Report Sweden facing climate change – threats and opportunities: Full Report Economics of Climate Adaptation Working Group – Shaping Climate Resilient Development: A Framework for Decision Making: Full Report. Opportunities The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change Full Report. 1. Emissions Accounting IPCC: Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative: Calculation Tools. The study Greenhouse Gas Emission Baselines for Global Cities and Metropolitan Regions provides a comparison of accounting practices of more than 40 global cities by provides a comparison of accounting practices of more than 40 global cities. 2. Existing methodologies and protocols for emissions accounting: The GHG Protocol for the U.S. Public Sector: Interpreting the Corporate Standard for U.S. Public Sector Organizations. Local Government Operations Protocol (LGOP) for the Quantification and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (Version 1.1). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories ISO 14064 Greenhouse Gases series of standards GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) Public Sector Agency Supplement. 3. Protocols and standards specifically for community emissions accounting: Greenhouse Gas Regional Inventory Protocol GRIP Global Protocol for Community-Scale GHG emissions (GPC). C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group and ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability. In collaboration with: World Bank, UNEP, UN-HABITAT, World Resources Institute Page 86 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net Appendix 5 Source: Draft City Climate Hazard Taxonomy. C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group and Arup. Page 87 of 87 @cdp | www.cdp.net