Download Chapter41_VG

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Quantum dot wikipedia , lookup

Density matrix wikipedia , lookup

Max Born wikipedia , lookup

Casimir effect wikipedia , lookup

Quantum fiction wikipedia , lookup

Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup

Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup

Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup

Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup

Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup

Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup

Instanton wikipedia , lookup

Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Erwin Schrödinger wikipedia , lookup

Wheeler's delayed choice experiment wikipedia , lookup

Bohr model wikipedia , lookup

Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup

Identical particles wikipedia , lookup

Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup

Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup

Propagator wikipedia , lookup

Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup

Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup

Quantum group wikipedia , lookup

Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Coherent states wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup

Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Quantum state wikipedia , lookup

Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup

Wave function wikipedia , lookup

Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup

Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup

Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup

Matter wave wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Chapter 41
1D Wavefunctions
Chapter 41. One-Dimensional
Quantum Mechanics
Topics:
• Schrödinger’s Equation: The Law of Psi
• Solving the Schrödinger Equation
• A Particle in a Rigid Box: Energies and Wave Functions
• A Particle in a Rigid Box: Interpreting the Solution
• The Correspondence Principle
• Finite Potential Wells
• Wave-Function Shapes
• The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator
• More Quantum Models
• Quantum-Mechanical Tunneling
The wave function is complex.

h2 2
ih  (x,t)  
 (x,t)  U(x) (x,t)
2
t
2m x
What is the PDF for finding a particle at x ?
P(x,t)   (x,t)
2
Step 1: solve Schrodinger equation for wave function
Step 2: probability of finding particle at x is P(x,t)   (x,t)
2
Stationary States - Bohr Hypothesis

h2 2
ih  (x,t)  
 (x,t)  U(x) (x,t)
2
t
2m x
 (x,t)  ̂ (x)e1Et /h
E

h
Stationary State satisfies
h2 2
E̂ (x)  
̂ (x)  U(x)̂ (x)
2
2m x
Stationary states
h2 2
E̂ (x)  
̂ (x)  U(x)̂ (x)
2
2m x
Rewriting:
2
2
̂
(x)



(x)̂ (x)
2
x
Dependence on x comes from
dependence on potential
2m
 (x)  2 E  U(x)
h
2
2
2
̂
(x)



(x)̂ (x)
2
x
2m
 (x)  2 E  U(x)
h
2
Classically
E  U(x)  K
K= kinetic energy
Requirements on wave function
1. Wave function is continuous
2. Wave function is normalizable
2
2
̂
(x)



(x)̂ (x)
2
x
 2 (x) 
2m
E  U(x)
2
h
2m
 (x)  2 K 
h
2
2
2
̂
(x)



(x)̂ (x)
2
x
2m
 2 (x)  2 E  U(x)
h
2m
2
 (x)  2 K 
h
For
2
2
̂
(x)



̂ (x)
2
x
0<x<L
̂ (x)  Asin  x  Bcos  x
Solution:
Boundary Conditions:
̂ (0)  0
̂ (L)  0
̂ (0)  0
̂ (0)  Asin0  Bcos0  B  B  0
 L  n
̂ (L)  Asin  L  0
n
Must have
̂ (L)  0
2
2m
 2 En 
h
h2 2 h2  n 
En 
n 
 
2m
2m  L 
2
Energy is Quantized
A Particle in a Rigid Box
The solutions to the Schrödinger equation for a particle in a rigid
box are
For a particle in a box, these energies are the only values of E
for which there are physically meaningful solutions
to the Schrödinger equation. The particle’s energy is
quantized.
A Particle in a Rigid Box
The normalization condition, which we found in Chapter
40, is
This condition determines the constants A:
The normalized wave function for the particle in quantum
state n is
EXAMPLE 41.2 Energy Levels
and Quantum jumps
QUESTIONS:
EXAMPLE 41.2 Energy Levels
and Quantum jumps
EXAMPLE 41.2 Energy Levels
and Quantum jumps
EXAMPLE 41.2 Energy Levels
and Quantum jumps
EXAMPLE 41.2 Energy Levels
and Quantum jumps
EXAMPLE 41.2 Energy Levels
and Quantum jumps
The Correspondence Principle
• Niels Bohr put forward the idea that the average behavior
of a quantum system should begin to look like the
classical solution in the limit that the quantum number
becomes very large—that is, as n  ∞.
• Because the radius of the Bohr hydrogen atom is r =
n2aB, the atom becomes a macroscopic object as n
becomes very large.
• Bohr’s idea, that the quantum world should blend
smoothly into the classical world for high quantum
numbers, is today known as the correspondence
principle.
The Correspondence Principle
As n gets even bigger and the number of oscillations
increases, the probability of finding the particle in an
interval x will be the same for both the quantum and the
classical particles as long as  x is large enough to include
several oscillations of the wave function. This is in
agreement with Bohr’s correspondence principle.
2
2
̂
(x)



(x)̂ (x)
2
x
2m
 2 (x)  2 E  U(x)
h
Between x=0 and x=L
 2 (x)  0
Outside
 2 (x)  0
Finite Potential Wells
The quantum-mechanical solution for a particle in a finite
potential well has some important properties:
• The particle’s energy is quantized.
• There are only a finite number of bound states. There
are no stationary states with E > U0 because such a
particle would not remain in the well.
• The wave functions are qualitatively similar to those
of a particle in a rigid box, but the energies are
somewhat lower.
• The wave functions extend into the classically
forbidden regions. (tunneling)
Finite Potential Wells
The wave function in the classically forbidden region of a
finite potential well is
The wave function oscillates until it reaches the classical
turning point at x = L, then it decays exponentially
within the classically forbidden region. A similar analysis
can be done for x ≤ 0.
We can define a parameter η defined as the distance into the
classically forbidden region at which the wave function has
decreased to e–1 or 0.37 times its value at the edge:
2
2
̂
(x)



(x)̂ (x)
2
x
2m
 2 (x)  2 E  U(x)
h
Outside
 2 (x)  0
2
1
̂ (x)  2 ̂ (x)
2
x

1
2m
 2 U 0  E 
2

h
Solution, x>L
̂ (x)  ̂ edge exp[(x  L) / ]
The Quantum Harmonic
Oscillator
The potential-energy function
of a harmonic oscillator, as
you learned in Chapter 10, is
where we’ll assume the equilibrium position is xe = 0.
The Schrödinger equation for a quantum harmonic
oscillator is then
The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator
The wave functions of the first three states are
Where  = (k/m)1/2 is the classical angular frequency, and n
is the quantum number
Quantum-Mechanical
Tunneling
Once the penetration distance
 is calculated using
1
2m
 2 U 0  E 
2

h
probability that a particle
striking the barrier from the
left will emerge on the right
is found to be
THE END !
Good Luck on the remaining exams