* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Eating Our Way Out of a Pickle
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Physical impacts of climate change wikipedia , lookup
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Canada wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Readers Digest November 2009 By Scott Leslie Eating Our Way Out of a Pickle How Changing to a Healthier diet could help fight Global Warming Can’t run out and buy a new hybrid car, can’t afford to install solar panels on the roof of your house, or public transit just isn’t an option for you? Don’t worry: There is something simple that each of us can do to help fight climate change and the answer just might surprise you. By cutting back on our consumption of animal based foods— meats, dairy, and eggs—we can greatly reduce global greenhouse-gas emissions. Scientists from the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, using data from the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) and integrated assessment modelling, have found that through diet change alone, we could cut about half of what’s needed to avoid the worst effects of global warming, limiting the temperature increase to no more then 2 degrees C. And there’s more: By reducing our greenhouse-gas emissions in this way, we would also lessen the need for expensive and unproven technologies, such as “clean coal” power plants. This would save an estimated $20 trillion by 2050. This isn’t the first time a strong link has been shown between the consumption of animal products and climate change. An in-depth 2006 FAO report that examined the impact of livestock production on the global environment noted that livestock’s overall contribution through deforestation for pasture lands and other activities related to rearing the meat, “currently amounts to 18% of the global warming effect—an even larger contribution than the transportation sector worldwide.” Other studies have come to similar conclusions. But this latest research from the Netherlands breaks new ground. “Our study is the first one that looks into the effect of the reduction of meat consumption on climate change and on the costs of climate policy,” says the lead author, Elke Stehfest. Many experts agree that the diet and lifestyle decisions we make can make a big difference. “Diet is factor over which consumers have a great deal of control. We can’t always choose whether or not we use electricity from alternative, non greenhousegas-emitting sources, but we can readily adjust our diets to reduce our carbon footprint,” says Nathan Pelletier, a PhD. Student in ecological economics at Dalhousie University. And some changes make a bigger difference than others. “Beef products typically have the largest greenhouse-gas footprint, while others, such as chicken, are much smaller,” Pelletier adds. At this point you’re probably asking yourself, am I going to have to become vegetarian, to help save the planet? No you don’t. According to the Dutch study, simply reducing our intake of meat and other animal products should do the trick. “We were quite surprised how much effect a supposedly healthy diet with still-significant meat consumption would have on mitigating climate change, “says Stehfest. In fact, the benefits cited in the study are based on diet recommendations from Eat, Drink, and Be Healthy; the Harvard Medical School Guide to Healthy Eating. The other surprise,” she adds “was how much cheaper ambitious climate targets become when changing the diet.” It looks like a win-win idea. Pelletier echoes the positive outcome of such an adjustment in eating habits. “According to most healthy eating guides, the typical North American currently consumes twice as much meat as needed,” he says. “Such a change should be palatable to many people, since we’re not talking about giving up meat altogether, just cutting back to healthy levels.” The bottom line is that it appears that eating to become healthier is also a boon to the planet. So, you might be asking, why is eating less meat so beneficial for the climate? Right now, there are just too many cows, sheep and other livestock on the planet. Individually, they may seem harmless enough, but collectively, their numbers—in the billions—take a huge toll on the global environment. They account for nearly one fifth of the total contribution of all greenhouse gases to climate change. Through their belching, flatulence and manure, they’re responsible for about 37% of the methane and 65% of the nitrous oxide produced worldwide by human-related activities. On a pound-for-pound basis, these two gases are 23 and 296 times worse respectively for global warming than carbon dioxide. In the simplest of terms, producing a single 250 gram beef patty for typical hamburger results in roughly as much greenhouse-gas emissions as driving a midsized car about 16 kilometres. Moreover, the loss of the vegetation—which absorbs carbon dioxide—from past and continued clearing of millions of hectares of forest for grazing lands also contributes to warming of the Earth. Far from being discouraging this newly emerging scientific knowledge shows that each of us can easily do something to make the world a better place for ourselves and for future generations. And while massive technological and institutional changes in energy production and transportation are no doubt also necessary to address global warming, dietary adjustment is increasingly being seen by scientists as a key piece of the puzzle for tackling climate change. It’s very encouraging to know that one of the most powerful solutions of all is also the simplest, and it’s right under our noses, on our dinner plates.