* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Formation
Impression management wikipedia , lookup
Intimate relationship wikipedia , lookup
Self-categorization theory wikipedia , lookup
Group development wikipedia , lookup
In-group favoritism wikipedia , lookup
Social loafing wikipedia , lookup
False consensus effect wikipedia , lookup
Social dilemma wikipedia , lookup
Interpersonal attraction wikipedia , lookup
James M. Honeycutt wikipedia , lookup
Social perception wikipedia , lookup
Social tuning wikipedia , lookup
Belongingness wikipedia , lookup
Group cohesiveness wikipedia , lookup
Interpersonal relationship wikipedia , lookup
Group Formation Chapter 4 What Factors Determine When a Group Will Form? People Joining with others in a group depends on individuals' personal qualities, including traits, social motives, and gender. Situations Some situations prompt people to affiliate with one another, including Ambiguous, dangerous situations Tasks and goals that can only be achieved by collaborating with others Relationships Groups form when individuals find they like one another. Who Joins Groups & Who Remains Apart? Personality Introversion & extraversion: extraverts are drawn to other people and groups and introverts avoid them (extraverts tend to be happier individuals) Relationality: individuals who adopt values, attitudes, and outlooks that emphasize and facilitate connections with others seek out group memberships Social Motivation Need for Affiliation – people with high need for affiliation tend to join more groups and spend more time in them; however, they often fear rejection Need for Intimacy – tend to join more groups in order to find close relationships with others Need for Power – need to influence others, need for control in groups (e.g., organizing and structuring activities) Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation (FIRO) Theory: Individuals’ need to receive and express inclusion, control, and affection influences group-seeking tendencies. The 3 basic needs identified by FIRO-B are: INCLUSION CONTROL forming new relationships and associating with others; determines the extent of contact and prominence that a person seeks. Include: • belonging • involvement • participation • recognition relates to decision making, influence, and persuasion between people; extent of power dominance that a person seeks. Include: • power • authority • influence • responsibility AFFILIATION relates to emotional ties and warm connections between people; it determines the extent of closeness that a person seeks. Include: • personal ties • consensus • sensitivity • support Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation (FIRO) For each of the three interpersonal needs—Inclusion, Control, and Affection—the FIRO instrument also provides a measure of how much each need is Expressed or Wanted by you. EXPRESSED The extent to which you will initiate the behavior. WANTED The extent to which you want or will accept that behavior from others. FIRO-B tool can help you maximize the impact of your actions, identify options for increasing your job satisfaction and productivity, and explore alternative ways to achieve your goals. Social Anxiety & Phobia fear of social situations – a feeling of apprehension and embarrassment experienced when anticipating or actually interacting with other people persistent, excessive, unrealistic fear of a specific object/situation avoidance behaviour Fight vs. Flight and Groups Social Anxiety & Phobia rooted in fear of negative evaluations becomes conditioned behaviour Disaffiliate – reduce social contact Innocuous Sociability – merge into the group’s background Attachment Attachment Style – approach to relationships with other Secure – comfortable with interpersonal intimacy Avoidant – evades intimacy with others Anxious – people desire intimacy, but are worried about rejection Sex differences in joining groups Women – more extraverted, caring, warm, empathic, socially responsible Men – seek membership in larger, formal, task-focused groups Affiliation Social comparison - gaining information from other people’s reactions Ambiguous, confusing circumstances Psychological reaction Negative emotions Uncertainty Need for information Affiliation and social comparison with others Cognitive Clarity Group Affiliation : When & Why Schachter’s studies of Affiliation How do people react in an ambiguous, frightening situation? Misery loves company: People affiliate with others Misery loves miserable company: Schachter found people prefer to wait with others facing a similar experience. Directional comparison downward social comparison: bolsters sense of competence upward social comparison: hope and motivation The self-evaluation maintenance (SEM) model: people affiliate with individuals who do not outperform them in areas that are very relevant to their self-esteem Social Support Safety in numbers - - "fight-or-flight" "tend-and-befriend“ Types of social support: Approval Emotional Informational Instrumental Spiritual Fight vs. Flight and Groups Collaboration Groups form when individuals seek goals that they cannot attain working alone. How difficult is the task? How complex is the task? How important is the task? Example: Gangs as a means to achieve goals Use drugs Family member belongs Impress girls Buy drugs Nothing to do Impress friends Impress neighborhood My neighborhood Defend Neighborhood Make money Sell drugs Protection 0 20 40 60 80 100 Group Attraction Newcomb’s Study of the Acquaintance Process Principles of Attraction 1. 2. Proximity Principle - People tend to like those who are situated near by. Elaboration Principle - Groups often emerge when groups, as complex system, grow as additional elements (people) become linked to original members. Similarity Principle People like those who are similar to them in some way. ie. homophily: similarity in attitudes, values, appearance,etc. Principles of Attraction Complementarity Principle People like others whose qualities complement their own qualities. Reciprocity Principle Liking tends to be mutual Minimax Principle Individuals are attracted to groups that offer them maximum rewards and minimal costs. Interpersonal Attraction Between Individuals Social Exchange Theory Relationships are like economic exchanges, bargains where maximum outcomes sought with minimum investment. Satisfaction is determined by comparison level (CL). Value of other groups determines comparison level for alternatives (CLalt)