Download To Be Subtle or To Be Clear?: Comparing Strategies for... People’s Attitudes Towards Social Groups

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Enactivism wikipedia , lookup

Other (philosophy) wikipedia , lookup

Social computing wikipedia , lookup

Social perception wikipedia , lookup

Social norms approach wikipedia , lookup

Play (activity) wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
To Be Subtle or To Be Clear?: Comparing Strategies for Changing
People’s Attitudes Towards Social Groups
M. Afzal Upal
Influence & Effects Research Group Adversarial Intent Section Defence Research & Development
Canada Toronto
Abstract: The problem of deciding which strategy to use to influence a target audience’s social identity beliefs is of
interest to social influence practitioners as well as social cognition researchers. This paper compares the effectiveness
of three social influence strategies in terms of their ability to lessen their reader’s affiliation for a targeted social
group. We designed three messages that vary in terms of (a) how well they hide their persuasive intent and (b)
clarity of the message. Our results indicate that message clarity had a stronger impact on people’s group affiliation
than the persuasive intent of the message. The most rhetorical and blunt Message 1 was more effective in reducing
people’s affiliation for the targeted group than the more subtle narrative Messages 2 & 3. The most subtle Message
3 was least effective in terms of being able to reduce subject’s affiliation for the targeted group.
2406