* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download yale - Particle Theory Group
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything wikipedia , lookup
Asymptotic safety in quantum gravity wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Hawking radiation wikipedia , lookup
Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Old quantum theory wikipedia , lookup
Search for the Higgs boson wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Weakly-interacting massive particles wikipedia , lookup
ALICE experiment wikipedia , lookup
Quantum gravity wikipedia , lookup
Compact Muon Solenoid wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Theory of everything wikipedia , lookup
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Kaluza–Klein theory wikipedia , lookup
Grand Unified Theory wikipedia , lookup
Technicolor (physics) wikipedia , lookup
ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Supersymmetry wikipedia , lookup
Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
the physics of extra dimensions Maria Spiropulu Enrico Fermi Institute/UofC 2014 : extra dimensions centennial from the Standard Model to extra dimensions many “flavors” of extra dimensions direct and indirect effects of extra dimensions at the TeV scale current results and upcoming discoveries : Gunnar Nordstrom : : Uber die Moglichkeit das electromagnetiche Feld und das Gravitationsfeld zu vereiningen Phys. Z. 15, 504 1914 Abstract. It is shown that a unified treatment of the electromagnetic and gravitational fields is possible if one views the four dimensional space time as a surface in a five dimensional world Thedor Kaluza Oscar Klein Kaluza Th.Sitzungsber. Press.Akad.Wiss.Math K1 (1921) 966 Klein O. Z.Phys. 37 (1926) 895 Kaluza and Klein started from 5-dim gravity and derived 4-dim gravity plus electromagnetism They compactified the 5th dimension around a circle of radius R (“cylinder condition”) M* 3 d x g R 5 GN=1/(MP)2 d x [ M P 4 2 1 g R F F ] 4 the Standard Model a list of particles with their “quantum numbers”, about 20 numbers that specify the strength of the various particle interactions, a mathematical formula that you could write on a napkin. 20s e e e e u u u d d d u u u L d d d Z 0 W W c c c s s s c c c t t t b b b t t t s s s t t t L g e e e e u u u d d d u u u L d d d Z 0 W W c c c s s s c c c t t t b b b t t t s s s t t t L g e e e e u u u d d d u u u L d d d Z 0 W W c c c s s s c c c t t t b b b t t t s s s t t t L g e e e e u u u d d d u u u L d d d Z 0 W W c c c s s s c c c t t t b b b t t t s s s t t t L g what does the Standard Model not explain ? quantum gravity HST image of an 800 light-year wide spiral shaped disk of dust fueling a 1.2x10^9 solar mass black hole in the center of NGC 4261 10s what does the Standard Model not explain ? quantum gravity dark matter and dark energy 10s what does the Standard Model not explain ? quantum gravity dark matter and dark energy Higgs G.t’Hooft 10s Arrange it so delicately that it will fall down in 19 minutes. the Bigger Big picture The Standard Model describes everything that we have seen to extreme accuracy. Michelangelo Antonioni on Ferrara: “...it is a city that you can only see partly and the rest disappears and can only be imagined...” (beyond the clouds) the Bigger Big picture Now we want to extend the model to higher energies and get the whole picture For this we need new experiments and ideas 32? 7? 6? extra dimensions? Experiments can actually discover them! String theory demands extra dimensions. 20sec hierarchy of scales 10-17 cm 10-33 cm Planck scale GN ~lPl2 =1/(MPl)2 Electroweak scale range of weak force mass is generated (W,Z) strong, weak, electromagnetic forces have comparable strengths 1028 cm 16 orders of magnitude puzzle Hubble scale size of universe lu 1m signals from extra dimensions in short range gravity observations in particle collision observations in astrophysical/cosmological observations how do we see a hidden dimension? ? what particles can move in that dimension ? how big is that dimension ? what is its shape Frameworks ADD type of models: the extra dimension(s) are finite (i.e. compactified), the world is a “braneworld”, gravity (or SM singlets) propagate in the bulk. Hierarchy is generated by a large volume of the extra dimensions. Direct emission/virtual exchange. RS type of models: the extra dimension(s) are infinite. Hierarchy is generated from a strong curvature of the extra dimensional space. Direct resonant production of the spin-2 states in the graviton KK tower. Universal (Yale) type of models : No branes. Momentum conservation; Pair production of KK excitations. hiding the extra dimensions (I) compactification Nima Arkani-Hamed Savas Dimopoulos Gia Dvali 1m Gauss’s Law If the n extra dimensions are compactified down to sizes R, then Gauss’s Law V (r ) ~ V (r ) ~ M 1 M Pln(24 n ) 1 M Pln(24 n ) 2 Planck m1m2 r R n 1 r m1m2 1 r R n R r n ~R M 2 n Pl ( 4 n ) 1m Kaluza-Klein modes If a spatial dimension is periodic then the momentum in that dimension is quantized: n p R From our dimensions of view the KK modes get mass: m 2 m02 n2 R 2 (n is the mode number, for 2 extra dimensions two modes etc…) p 4 R 3 R 2 R 1 R 0 KK momentum tower of states R Pick the effective (higher dimensional) Planck Scale at 1TeV, then n 1 R ~ 10 Km n2 R ~ 1mm n3 R ~ 1nm 9 n 6,7 R ~ 10 fm hiding the extra dimensions (II) brane-worlds There could be other branes which would look like dark matter to us Standard Model particles are trapped on a brane and can’t move in the extra dimensions Infinite Randall - Sundrum G Mother brane 5th dimension Our world brane Zero mode graviton is trapped on the mother brane (Planck brane) gravity gets stronger at extremely high energies (or short distances). it gets stronger at lower energies if there are extra dimensions…. Grand Unification gravity Higher Energy gravitons are the most robust probe of extra dimensions gravity is so weak that we have never even seen a graviton. melectronmelectron F=GN r2 melectron r melectron The gravitational attraction between two electrons is about 1042 times smaller than the electromagnetic repulsion. graviton production in collider experiments: graviton emission Each KK-graviton state couples to the wall with Planck supressed strength The number of KK-states ~(ER)d The sum over all KK-states is not MPl supressed but MPl(4+d) supressed i.e. MEWK supressed so we have sizable cross sections graviton Exchange Fermion or VB pairs at hadron or e+e- colliders Collider Detector at Fermilab graviton emission in particle collisions www.columbia.edu/~lab71 graviton emission simulation: concentric cylindrical layers energy deposited from the particle debris of the collision in the middle “lego” event display Two events are graviton simulation and one is real CDF data: Can you pick the gravitons? two events are real CDF data and one is graviton simulation; Can you pick the graviton? qqbar->g G (d=2, M=1TeV, s=1.8TeV) [Giudice, Rattazzi, Wells, Nucl. Phys. B544, 3 (1999) and corrected version, hepph/9811291] t m2 S 1 d qq gG F , n2 1 dt 36 sM S s s F1 x, y y 1 6 x 18 x 2 Lykken/Matchev/Burkett/Spiropulu 16 x 6 y x1 2 x y (1 4 x) 1 4 x1 x 1 2 x 2 x 2 x y 1 x 3 2 3 Case d=6 Only qqbar->g G (PYTHIA 6.115 + graviton process), d=6, M=1TeV, s=1.8TeV qq Gg n MSreach, Run I MS reach, Run II 2 1100 GeV 1400 GeV 950 GeV 1150 GeV 850 GeV 1000 GeV 700 GeV 900 GeV [Mirabelli, Perelstein, Peskin, PRL 82, 2236 (1999)] 3 very very optimistic estimates 4 5 LHC 100fb-1 8.5 TeV 6.8 TeV 5.8 TeV 5.0 TeV Monojet+missing energy: DØ limit Monojet+missing energy: CDF Expected number of gravitons for 84pb-1 Result very soon e+e- G @L3 [Giudice, Rattazzi, Wells, Nucl. Phys. B544, 3 (1999) and cor. version: hep ph/9811291] d 2 s d 2 E f ( x , cos ) e e G x s dxd cos 32s (d / 2) M D 2(1 x)d / 21 2 2 2 2 4 4 f ( x , cos ) ( 2 x ) ( 1 x x ) 3 x ( 1 x ) cos x cos x(1 cos 2 ) 2 d /2 (GMSB analyses) e+e-GZ Z ff G 1 Z ff 8 MZ M ( a la Higgs analyses) n2 7 I (n) 1.66 10 / M 4 for n 2 [Balazs, Dicus, He, Repko, Yuan, hepph/9904220, Z width] [Cheung, Keung, hep-ph/9903294, recoil mass] MET+jets n ZG(pb) e ZG95%(pb) Ms(TeV) 2 0.64 0.56 0.29 0.60 L3: Phys. Lett. B470, 281 (1999) Visible Mass analysis ALEPH-CONF-99-027 Total cross section analysis 3 0.08 0.56 0.30 0.38 4 0.01 0.55 0.30 0.29 Monojet + missing energy: LHC reach Ian Hinchliffe n 14 TeV 100 fb-1 14 TeV 1000 fb-1 28 TeV 100 fb-1 28 TeV 1000 fb-1 2 9 12 15 19 3 4 6.8 5.8 8.3 6.9 11.5 10 14 12 Pair production via virtual graviton exchange 2 e.g > Gravity effects interfere with SM effects > 3 terms in the production cross section: SM, intrerference, gravity > the sum over the KK states is divergent and a cutoff is required (Ms) Virtual exchange: dielectron and diphoton D0 limits M() = 574 GeV cos* = 0.86 Virtual exchange: diphoton CDF analysis (anomalous Z couplings analyses,WW x-section,Z) e+e- ,VV Standard Model 2 (1 cos 2 ) 2 (1 cos ) 4 2 d 2 s 1 1 cos 2 (e e ) d cos s 4 T 8 1 O Gravity T Giudice, Rattazzi, Wells, Nucl. Phys. B544, 3 (1999) and corrected version, hepph/9811291] Agashe, Deshpande, Phys. Lett. B456, 60 (1999) M S4 1 ( AD) M 4 S ( JH ) 1 2 4 T (GRW ) Two-photon measurements at LEP-II Ms Ms ( JH ) | Summary LEP 184 GeV 189 GeV Graviton Emission 202 GeV ee G n=2 n=3 n=4 n=5 n=6 n=2 A 1.28 0.97 0.78 0.66 0.57 D 1.38 1.02 0.84 0.68 0.58 L3 1.02 0.81 0.67 0.58 0.51 ee ZG n=3 n=4 n=5 n=6 0.35 0.22 0.17 0.14 0.12 0.60 0.38 0.29 0.24 0.21 Virtual Graviton Exchange ee qq ff A 0.80 1.03 D L3 O 0.91 0.99 0.63 0.68 0.59 0.73 0.56 0.69 0.63 0.60 0.57 0.59 0.56 0.65 0.58 0.54 0.50 0.63 0.66/0.61 0.55/0.55 (bb) 0.49 0.49 0.82 1.04 0.60 0.76 0.84 1.00 0.61 0.68 WW ZZ 0.91 0.92 0.69 0.71 0.80 0.68 0.79 0.79 0.63 0.64 Combined ALL 0.84/1.12 (<189) 0.75/1.00 0.60/0.76 (ff) (<202) 0.76 0.77 0.87/1.07 (<189) 0.82/0.89 (VV) 0.61/0.68 (ff) (<189) RS phenomenology 1500 GeV KK graviton/ its tower of states at LHC e+e- 500 GeV KK graviton/ its tower of states at a lepton collider 500 GeV KK graviton and neutral gauge boson excitations Davoudiasl, Hewett,Rizzo A spin 2 graviton: Can we tell? 1.5 TeV graviton in Randal Sundrum at LHC new accelerators for new physics Linear Collider (?,~2012) Large Hadron Collider (CERN, 2006) Plethora of new models that involve extra dimensions Use Extra Dimensions Geomerty to solve: EWKB hierarchy problem SUSY Breaking flavor Breaking neutrino masses proton decay supression Grand Unification the cosmological problem More ideas are being explored hiding the extra dimensions (III) no need to hide them extra-new ideas (Arkani-Hamed et al, Hill et al…..) Deconstructing dimensions and sting theories: The extra dimension(s) emerges from the theory, is well used, and then the theory comes back to the normal 4 dimensions serviced and healthy and with all the necessary Higgses. No tricks. what is the physics that connects the gravitational scale and the scale of the typical mass of the elementary particles what are the dimensions and dynamics behind spacetime how is string theory connected to the world Space and time may be doomed. E. Witten I am almost certain that space and time are illusions. N. Seiberg The notion of space-time is clearly something we’re going to have to give up. A. Strominger If you ask questions about what happened at very early times, and you compute the answer, the answer is: Time doesn’t mean anything. S. Coleman Nima Arkani-Hamed D. Gross SCIENCE: The Glorious Entertainment …for any important assertion evidence must be produced; …prophecies and bugaboos must be subjected to scrutiny; … guesswork must be replaced by exact count; ….accuracy is a virtue and inquiry is a moral imperative To the hegemony of science we owe a feeling for which there is no name, but which is akin to the faith of the innocent that the truth will out and vindication will follow. In its purest form science is justice as well as reason. Jacques Barzun : Eot-Wash Group Adelberger et al Measured gravity at the sub-mm level (down 0.2 mm) 1030 1023 Purdue (AFM experiment 2001) Fischbach et al PRL 86 1418 (200 10-10 V (r ) dr1 dr2 GN (r1 ) (r2 ) - r12 1 exp r12 short range gravity measurements C.D. Hoyle, Ph.D thesis University of Washington, 2001 <150 mm M*>4 TeV short range gravity measurements (Price &Long) 100u 1 (QED analyses) + ee ff d e e ff SM ( s, t ) 4 INTF ( s, t ) 4 Ms d Ms M SHewett 2 4 GRW T 1 M SHewett M SRizzo 1 2 GRV ( s, t ) Terms ~cos3, ~cos4 make differential cross sections a unique signature For ff other than ee the integrated interference term for scattering angles from 0 to is ZERO. The interference between graviton and t-channel SM Bhabha is giving sizable contributions good sensitivity Every author and every experiment choose their Ms, T,sign conventions as different ap from the others... [Hewett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4765 (1999) - DY] [Giudice, Rattazzi, Wells Nucl. Phys. B544, 3 (1999) and corrected version, hep-ph/9811291 – DY, Bhabha] [Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D59, 115010 (1999) - Bhabha] 1 Bhabha scattering results ALEPH,OPAL,DELPHI,L3 combined: (Bourilkov hep-ph/9907380) MS>1.26 TeV (=+1) Ms>960 TeV (=-1) Black Hole production at high energy collisions (Banks et al., Dimopoulos et al. Giddings et al.) L. BORISSOV Collider Black Hole Production? • If the Planck scale is the TeV scale, gravity becomes strong at the TeV scale : In high energy particle collisions short-lived microscopic black holes will be created • These decaying black holes could be observed in future colliders, such as CERN’s LHC! ( bets?) p p