* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Presentation from Professor Bill McGuire
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Views on the Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in New Zealand wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
CLIMATE CHANGE ….where are we now? ….where are we going? ….are we too late? Bill McGuire The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 How others see us! “Sometimes you see beautiful people with no brains. Sometimes you have ugly people who are intelligent…..like scientists” José Mourinho. Chelsea FC Manager BBC Online. February 20th 2005 The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Climate change…its no joke! The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Content • Leading questions and key points • Stern & IPCC AR4 • Where are we now? – – – – CO2 levels Temperatures The Poles Emissions • Where are we going? • How bad can things get? • What do we need to do? The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Some leading questions • Asked to address two pertinent questions • Why do all companies need to develop a sustainable carbon policy? • Where will the carbon emission debate go next? The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Q1: some straightforward answers • We are in real trouble • Industry and commerce as a whole MUST develop a sustainable carbon policy – To contribute to effective emissions cuts – To avoid climate catastrophe • Individual companies – Need to be seen to be acting responsibly as climate change dominates agenda – Ultimately to prosper or even survive in an inevitably more chaotic and unstable social & economic environment The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Q2: some straightforward answers • Greenhouse gas emissions are still on the rise • Kyoto commitments end in 2012 • Prospects for a follow-up that has clout remain bleak • Next key meeting: Bali, December 2007 • More on emissions trends later The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Some key points • Climate change is real • It is not going to go away • It is caused by human activities • Things are going to get bad • The longer we leave things & less we do, the worse it will be • Global emissions are accelerating The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Greenhouse Earth • Three factors influence Greenhouse Effect – Solar influx – Albedo – Atmospheric composition • Only one has changed significantly over last 300 years Relative proportions of Greenhouse gases – – – – Carbon dioxide up 36% Methane up 150% Nitrous oxide up 17% Tropospheric ozone up 35% The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Stern & IPCC AR4 • Scary but not enough! • STERN: CC could result in 20% contraction of global economy • IPCC: Warming of climate is ‘unequivocal’ – Expected warming for 550 ppm → 2 – 4.5C – Values substantially higher cannot be excluded • Consensus; conservative – political interference – feedbacks/catastrophic scenarios not addressed The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Where are we now? CO2 levels • Carbon dioxide levels – 1663 279ppm – 1970 325ppm – 2006 383ppm • Sharp jump in last 5 years • Rate double that of 30y ago • Highest for 650,000 y; may be higher than for 30 million years • Keeps Venus at snug 483º C The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Where are we now? Temperature 19 of the hottest years on record occurred in last 25 years The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 The global picture The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Where are we now? The poles • Greenland ice melt – 1996 96 km3 – 2005 240 km3 • Glaciers moving up to 15 km y; some surging up to 5 km in 90 minutes • Break-up in ≤ 300 years • IPCC AR4 18-59cm sea-level rise by 2100 • Growing consensus rise will be far more rapid • Total rise – Greenland 7 m – + WAIS 12 m The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Where are we now? Emissions • Kyoto Protocol – Reduce emissions by 5.2% below 1990 levels – 172 countries – US not signatory – China & India not required to reduce • Between 2000 and 2005 emissions rose 4 x faster than in previous decade • China now largest emitter of greenhouse gases • UK committed to 12.5% cut (below 1990) by 2012 – Emissions up for last 3y European heat-wave 2003 The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Where are we going? CO2 levels Greenland Summer melt • Main target to keep levels below that which will trigger 2° C rise • Dangerous climate change • May be as low as 450 ppm • At current rates will reach this within 25 y • Taking into account other GHGs may be within 7 y The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Where are we going? Temperature The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Where are we going? The Poles • 60 cm rise would drown 26,000 km2 of US – Florida; Gulf Coast; Maryland; Virginia • 1 m rise would threaten ~ 1 billion people and 1/3 of world’s agricultural land – Thames Barrier ineffective • 1.5 m rise would inundate 58,000 km2 of US • 7 m + rise would flood all coastal urban centres: London, New York, Tokyo, Sydney, Shanghai • IPCC 2007: 50 percent probability that widespread ice sheet loss can not be avoided The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Where are we going? Emissions • Business as usual – By 2030 energy emissions grow by 40 – 110 percent – 2/3 to 3/4 contribution from developing countries • UK Gov target – Up to 30% cut by 2020 – Reality: 12 – 17% • Targets of EU and others likely to be similarly optimistic • Problem: balancing economic growth with climate change mitigation The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 What do we need to do? • To stabilise GHG levels at 445 – 490 ppm (CO2 equiv) – 50 to 80 % cut in global emissions by 2050 (maybe more) – Emissions would need to peak before 2015 – Would still result in 2 – 2.4° C T rise • Still insufficient to prevent dangerous climate change • Seven years to save the planet The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 How bad can things get? • If all conventional hydrocarbons burnt → average 7º C temperature rise • If unconventional sources (tar sands; clathrates) included → 13º C • Plants and soils hold twice as much carbon dioxide as the atmosphere. • With increased warming some sinks may become sources • Other sources include methane from permafrost • Most Arctic permafrost will have disappeared by next century The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 Contraction & Convergence: a last hope? • Post-Kyoto agreement critical • Must bind US, China and India to mandatory targets • Last chance? – Emissions trading has a role to play – Only within C & C framework – Everyone has right to emit the same quantity of GHG – US citizen emits 5 tonnes of CO2 a year; a Nigerian emits 0.09 t – Within C & C emissions contract overall and converge to a standard level • Aim: GHG stabilisation at 450 ppm in 2100 The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007 ….and finally: the Earth fights back • Prospect of increasing volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, submarine landslides and tsunamis • Inaction on climate change not an option – Huge vested interest for all companies to play their part – The ultimate in CSR – Alternative trying to operate against a background of crumbling economy, fraying social fabric and a rapidly deteriorating environment • Economic growth OR tackling climate change is not a viable choice The information contained in this document is strictly proprietary and confidential ©Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre 2007