* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Pershing -- BASIC SAO PAOLO meeting
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Emissions trading wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Kyoto Protocol and government action wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in New Zealand wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Views on the Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
A View from the US B A S I C Sao Paolo, Brazil August, 2006 Jonathan Pershing, Rob Bradley Climate, Energy and Pollution Program World Resources Institute http://www.wri.org Overview • Observed 20th century climate change ― Emissions ― Impacts • • Projections: future expectations for emissions US Policy ― Federal ― State ― Private The US contributes the largest share of global GHG emissions… Rest of World US (20%) Global GHG Emissions Source: WRI/CAIT, 2000 Data U.S. Emissions Mix 100 % Share of Fuel Mix Renewables 75 Hydro Nuclear 50 Gas 25 Oil Coal 0 Source: WRI/CAIT Source: IEA Statistics 4 GHG Flow Diagram: Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions GHG Flow Diagram: Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions State GHG Emissions, 2001 MT CO2 eq of CO2, CH4, N2O, PFCs, SF6, includes land use Source: WRI/CAIT Change over 20th Century: Annual Mean Temperature ºF Americans may soon have to settle for a Non-Glacier National Park. Projections: future expectations for emissions US CO2 Emissions Projections 60 50 EIA High 40 EIA Ref 30 EIA Low IEA (USA & Canada) 20 POLES 10 Source: WRI/CAIT 24 20 22 20 20 20 18 20 16 20 14 20 12 20 10 20 08 20 06 20 20 04 0 Projected Future GHG Emissions Growth % Percent change from 2000 Source: WRI, Baumert et al, 2005 “Heat index” combines temperature and humidity to measure discomfort. Washington DC July heat index was 87°F in 1970, reaches about 98°F in a 2xCO2 world and 110°F in a 4xCO2 world. Under BAU, we’re headed for 4x. Drought Expectations The Palmer Index is most effective in determining long term drought—a matter of several months —and is not as good with short-term forecasts (a matter of weeks). It uses a 0 as normal, and drought is shown in terms of minus numbers; for example, minus 2 is moderate drought, minus 3 is severe drought, and minus 4 is extreme drought. A one meter sea level rise US Policy ― Federal ― State ― Private Sector Bush Administration Climate/Energy Policy Initiatives • Goal: to reduce US GHG intensity by 18% by 2012 – Equivalent to ~4% reduction relative to BaU – Total emissions increase by 31% over 1990 levels – Further measures in 2012 if target not met • Voluntary initiatives – Improve voluntary registry (provide baseline to give “credits” for real reduction; likely to require legislation) – Climate VISION Partnership (12 sectors and BRT work with EPA, DOE, DOT and USDA to reduce GHG emissions) – Climate Leaders (EPA corporate partnership with individual companies; 50 companies now participating) • Fuel economy standards for light trucks (20.7mpg 22.2mpg by 2007) • Tax incentives for GHG reductions (RE, EE and sequestration) USG Roadmap for Climate Change Technology Development and Deployment for the 21st Century Source: U.S. Climate Change Technology Program Strategic Plan, Draft for Public Comment – September 2005 US Technology Program Budget US Climate Technology Program Activity Agency 2007 Proposed Budget ($millions) IGCC & Sequestration DOE 123.8 Hydrogen Storage DOE 34.6 Cellulosic Biomass (Biochemical Platform R&D) DOE 32.8 Advanced Nuclear DOE 25 Low Wind Speed Technology DOE 19.1 Transportation Fuel Cell Systems DOE 7.5 Methane Partnership EPA 13 Numerous Proposals have been made in the US Congress… …although few have passed • • • GHG reduction • • • Energy Policy GHG Reporting Supporting International Negotiations Appropriations Power Plants • • • • • • • Transport Hydrogen Clean Coal Carbon Sequestration Buildings Waste recycling Science/Research McCain-Lieberman Climate Stewardship Act • Summary: – A bill establishing a market-driven system of greenhouse gas tradable allowances – Cap: at 2000 levels by 2010 • Voting History: – October 2003: 43-55 – June 2005: 38 - 60 Sense of the Senate (Vote 54-43) • Congress finds that— (1) greenhouse gases accumulating in the atmosphere are causing average temperatures to rise… and are posing a substantial risk…; (2) there is a growing scientific consensus that human activity is a substantial cause…; and (3) mandatory steps will be required to slow or stop the growth of greenhouse gas emissions …. • Sense of the Senate Congress should enact a comprehensive and effective national program of mandatory, market-based limits and incentives on emissions of greenhouse gases that slow, stop, and reverse the growth of such emissions…. -- US Senate: June 2005 The Safe Climate Act of 2006 (H.R. 5642, Rep Waxman) • Freeze U.S. GHG emissions in 2010 at the 2009 levels. • Beginning 2011, cuts emissions by roughly 2% per year (reaching 1990 emissions levels by 2020). • After 2020, cuts emissions by roughly 5% per year (by 2050, emissions will be 80% lower than in 1990). • Implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) through: – Cap-and-trade program (with auctioned permit revenues supporting “Climate Reinvestment Fund”) – Standards for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles that are at least as stringent as the current California standards. EPA must tighten these standards in 2014 and periodically thereafter. – Standards requiring an increasing proportion of electricity to be generated from renewable energy sources, reaching 20% in 2020. – Standards requiring utilities to obtain, each year, 1% of their energy supplies through end use energy efficiency improvements Climate Action Plans Source: Pew Climate Center Renewable Energy Mandates Source: Pew Climate Center States with Biofuel Mandates Ethanol Mandates Biodiesel Mandates Source: WRI, CAIT US Renewable Resources Source: U.S. Climate Change Technology Program Strategic Plan, Draft for Public Comment – September 2005 Geothermal US market developing too • Goal: A regional cap-and-trade program initially covering CO2 emissions from power plants – Stabilize emissions at base levels through 2014 – Reduce by 10% by 2018 • Region statistics: – 7 states represent 7% US total GHG emissions – 1.5% of world GHG emissions ( Australia, rank 15th) • Other states: MD (just signed), MA (expected to rejoin with new governor) 31 California Policies • Transport –Starting in 2003,10% light duty vehicles to be zero emitting –15% of buses with zero emissions by 2008 • Registry of GHGs (CCAR) • RPS: 20% by 2017 • $62 million public research program GHG and Fuel Economy Standards 55 EU MPG - Converted to CAFE Test Cycle 50 Japan 45 40 California China 35 Australia Canada 30 25 20 2002 US 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Fox News Climate Change Poll (October 25-26, 2005) “Do you think the Global warming situation is best described as a crisis, a major problem, or is it not problem at all?” Crisis Not a Problem Major Problem Don't Know Minor Problem “Who do you think should be mostly responsible for protecting the nation’s environment?” Manufacturers All/Combiniation Government Don't Know Citizens US Shareholder Resolutions on Climate Change 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Source: WRI based on Investor Network on Climate Risk Closing Thoughts Concluding Comments • • • • • Climate change impacts are already being seen in the US, and are projected to become more severe Federal action is limited: The Bush Administration has paid only lip service to the problem, and Congress, while authoring many proposals, has passed very few Most climate efforts are at the State and local level; these are beginning to shape both pubic opinion and corporate behavior. For the foreseeable future, the US is likely to operate in a highly fragmented policy regime, including combinations of government regulations, markets and technology, augmented by private sector initiatives; these will vary from State to State and sector to sector. Ultimately, the race is between effective policy and emissions reductions, and climate change and increased impacts. So far, impacts are winning. – This may change in the next presidential election – but perhaps less than many would wish as a result of the entrenched nature of the US energy sector in the economy