* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Increasing gene editing efficiencies in eukaryotic cell lines by
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis wikipedia , lookup
Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics in stem-cell differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Mir-92 microRNA precursor family wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup
Genome editing wikipedia , lookup
No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup
Increasing gene editing efficiencies in eukaryotic cell lines by selection of appropriate CRISPR-Cas9 reagents Melissa L. Kelley, Žaklina Strezoska, Elena Maksimova, Hidevaldo Machado, Emily M. Anderson, Maren Mayer, Annaleen Vermeulen, Shawn McClelland, Anja van Brabant Smith Dharmacon, now part of GE Healthcare, 2650 Crescent Drive, Suite #100, Lafayette, CO 80026, US Abstract Lentiviral Cas9 combined with synthetic crRNA:tracrRNA Genetic engineering of living cells is critical for understanding gene function in normal and diseased states. The CRISPR-Cas9 system is widely utilized because of its ease-ofuse compared to other gene editing methods. This system requires a complex of Cas9 protein with tracrRNA and a gene-targeting crRNA to introduce double-strand DNA breaks at specific locations in the genome to disrupt protein translation and knockout gene function. To achieve high gene editing efficiencies, it is essential to choose the best CRISPR-Cas9 reagents for delivery and expression in the cells of interest. Edit-R Lentiviral Cas9 Nuclease Expression vectors allow generation of a Cas9 stable cell population for evaluating knockout phenotypes in a population (Figure 4). This approach can be especially beneficial for experiments where reproducibility and wider dynamic range of the phenotypic assay are highly desired, such as screening applications. Additionally, integrated Cas9 and synthetic crRNA:tracrRNA results in higher editing efficiency without the need to perform enrichment of plasmidtransfected cells using FACS or puromycin selection (Figures 5 and 6). Choosing a CRISPR-Cas9 system for efficient gene editing CRISPR components can be delivered using transfection or viral transduction. Plasmid-expressed Cas9 can be co-transfected with synthetic crRNA:tracrRNA for efficient gene editing in cells amenable to lipid delivery, followed by isolation of knockout clonal lines (Figure 1). Cas9 vectors packaged into lentiviral particles can be used to generate a Cas9 stable cell line for transfections with crRNA:tracrRNA to evaluate gene knockout phenotypes in a population (Figure 4). Co-transfection of Cas9 plasmid and synthetic crRNA:tracrRNA A synthetic approach to crRNA:tracrRNA complex enables fast assessment of multiple target sites per gene, or for multiple genes, without the requirement of any cloning steps or in vitro transcription (Figures 2 and 3). Transfect A549 cells crRNA:tracrRNA Cas9 expression Transfect A549 cells plasmid crRNA:tracrRNA Cas9 expression plasmid Lentiviral transduction 1 day Edit-R Cas9 1 day Target cells 6-15 days Gene target Puromycin selection Gene target PPIB crRNA:tracrRNA Puromycin selection crRNA:tracrRNA PPIB + - - - + + UT - + - + - NA + + + CDKN1A + - CDKN1A UT - - + + UT NA + - + - NA - + + UT - + - NA At 24 hours split cells into a At 24 puromycin hours split cells into a containing medium Selection with blasticidin puromycin containing medium 3-6 weeks Clonal cell isolation and expansion Expansion of blasticidin-selected cell population Cas9 clonal cell line Cas9 cell line mixed population Synthetic crRNA:tracrRNA transfection M Synthetic crRNA:tracrRNA transfection C 1 2 21 11 1 17 % gene editing% gene editing 2 11 17 (PPIB) (PPIB) mismatch detection mismatch detection assay using T7E1 assay using T7E1 48 hours under IncubateIncubate 48 hours under antibiotic antibiotic selection selection Figure 7. A549 cells were co-transfected with Edit-R Cas9-PuroR plasmid, tracrRNA and crRNAs targeting PPIB or CDKN1 and selected with puromycin for 48 hours. A mismatch detection assay using T7EI show increased editing in A549 cells after puromycin selection. Mismatched inhibitor target sites show that 3 position of mismatch affects functionality days Enrichment of edited cells by FACS analysis 3 days 3 A. mKate2 Expression in HEK293T Negative Low Medium High B. crRNA targeting PPIB in HEK293T Unsorted cells UT Gene editing and phenotypic analyses Figure 4. Lentiviral Cas9 and synthetic crRNA:tracrRNA workflow. The optimal promoter for Cas9 expression results in greater gene editing efficiency Log of Fluorescence Intensity hCMV-mKate2-Cas9 + tracrRNA:crRNA-PPIB Untransfected control To achieve the highest editing efficiency in a cell line of interest, it is important to select the promoter most suitable for the cells of interest. Cas9 expression levels differ among promoters, leading to varying levels of gene editing efficiency (Figures 5 and 6). crRNA:tracrRNA Cas9 expression plasmid Puromycin resistance marker allows rapid selection and enrichment of edited cells Sorted cells US Neg Low Med High 14 4 24 30 % Gated Depending on the transfectablity of specific cells, CRISPR components can be delivered using plasmid transfection or lentiviral transduction. Plasmid-expressed Cas9 can be co-transfected with synthetic crRNA and tracrRNA for efficient gene editing in cells amenable to lipid delivery. Cas9 that is packaged into lentiviral particles can be transduced into cells that are refractory to transfection. Lentiviral Cas9 can also be used to generate stable cell lines, which can then be transfected or transduced by synthetic or lentiviral-based CRISPR RNA components; this is particularly useful for screening applications. Importantly, expressing humanized Cas9 from different promoters (e.g., human and mouse CMV and EF1α, PGK, CAG) in different cell types results in varying levels of Cas9 expression and consequently, varying efficiencies of gene editing. In addition, cells transfected or transduced with gene editing reagents can be enriched by antibiotic selection or FACS using reagents in which the Cas9 gene is co-expressed with either an antibiotic resistance marker or a fluorescent protein reporter. This enrichment facilitates the isolation of clonal cells containing the desired mutation. Presented here are data demonstrating improvement of gene editing efficiencies in cells of interest by using the most effective delivery and selection approaches with the optimal CRISPRCas9 reagents. Enrichment of cell populations for increased gene editing events Highly efficient gene editing in Cas9-expressing mouse NIH/3T3 cells using synthetic PPIB crRNA:tracrRNA % editing: 27 mismatch detection assay using T7E1 Figure 8. Edit-R mKate2-Cas9 bicistronic plasmids allow enrichment of gene edited cells by FACS analysis. HEK293T cells were transiently co-transfected with mKate2-Cas9 expressing plasmids, synthetic crRNA targeting PPIB, and synthetic tracrRNA. Cells were sorted 72 hours post-transfection. Percent editing was determined with a mismatch detection assay using T7EI. Conclusions best 2-3 Days Analyze editing in cell population 3-4 Days Enrichment of edited cells by FACS Mismatch detection assay Edit-R (mKate2) Nuclease Expression Plasmids Enrichment of edited cells by antibiotic selection Edit-R (PuroR) Nuclease Expression Plasmids Isolate clonal knockout lines for further analysis Figure 1. Plasmid Cas9 and synthetic crRNA:tracrRNA co-transfection and enrichment workflow. Rapid assessment of multiple crRNAs with Dharmacon™ Edit-R™ CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Engineering system crRNAs targeting VEGFA M U2OS cells 96-well format T7EI endonuclease No enrichment % editing VCP cr1 Cas9 promoter crRNA:tracrRNA - hCMV + + + mCMV - + + + - hEF1α + + + - mEF1α + + + - PGK + + + - CAG + + + • Synthetic crRNA:tracrRNA with a Cas9 nuclease allows fast, high efficiency gene editing without cloning steps. • The ability to quickly evaluate multiple crRNAs leads to the selection of the best target sequence and, therefore, most effective knockout of the gene of interest. % gene editing (Ppib) 27 32 29 43 44 44 52 56 55 46 52 51 45 46 47 48 54 53 A Figure 5. NIH/3T3 cells were transduced with Edit-R Lentiviral Cas9 Nuclease Expression particles for stable expression of Cas9 and a blasticidin resistance gene driven by the indicated promoters. The cell populations were selected with blasticidin for a minimum of 10 days before crRNA;tracrRNA transfections. Cells were transfected with 50 nM synthetic crRNA:tracrRNA targeting Ppib using DharmaFECT 1 Transfection Reagent. After 72 hours, the relative frequency of gene editing was calculated from a mismatch detection assay using T7EI. • Applying a highly efficient lentiviral Cas9 nuclease approach allows researchers to establish stable cell populations or clonal lines for improved reproducibility and a further increase in editing frequency. • Choosing the best promoter is recommended to achieve maximum Cas9 expression in the cell line of interest and therefore better editing efficiency. - cr1 - cr2 cr3 - cr4 cr5 Figure 2. Edit-R Cas9-mKate2 plasmid, synthetic tracrRNA and five different synthetic crRNAs targeting VEGFA were co-transfected into U2OS cells. Various levels of gene editing were achieved as assessed by a mismatch detection assay using T7 Endonuclease I (T7EI). 22 VCP cr2 21 14 14 16 PSMD7 cr2 PSMD14 cr4 • Antibiotic resistance gene or fluorescent marker on the plasmid expressing Cas9 enable enrichment of edited cells, thus improving phenotypic readout and facilitating clonal selection. Efficient gene editing in U2OS cells expressing Cas9 from different promoters gelifesciences.com/dharmacon best Cas9 promoter crRNA:tracrRNA - hCMV + + + mCMV - + + + - hEF1α + + + mEF1α - + + + - PGK + + + - CAG + + + PSMD cr5 % gene editing (PPIB) Figure 3. Disruption of proteasome function by crRNAs targeting components of the 26S proteasome pathway: VCP, PSMD7 and PSMD14. A recombinant U2OS ubiquitin-EGFP proteasome cell line was co-transfected with Cas9 plasmid and crRNA:tracrRNA. The accumulation of ubiquitin-EGFP was measured 72 hours post-transfection demonstrating disruption of proteasome function by knockout of functional proteins. 25 24 24 24 24 24 28 28 27 29 26 30 17 17 19 39 34 28 Figure 6. A recombinant U2OS ubiquitin-EGFP proteasome cell line with stably integrated Cas9 was transfected with 50 nM synthetic crRNA:tracrRNA using DharmaFECT 3 Transfection Reagent to target PPIB. After 72 hours, the relative frequency of gene editing was calculated from a mismatch detection assay using T7EI. TM