* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Insectos resistentes: el reto de las plantas transgénicas
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Management of insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins Juan Ferré (University of Valencia, Spain) Insect species that have evolved Bt resistance in the laboratory Lepidoptera Ö Plodia interpunctella Ö Heliothis virescens Ö Helicoverpa armigera Ö Pectinophora gossypiella Ö Spodoptera exigua Ö Spodoptera littoralis Ö Trichoplusia ni Ö Ostrinia nubilalis Ö Plutella xylostella Coleoptera Ö Leptinotarsa decemlineata Ö Chrysomela scripta Diptera Ö Culex quinquefasciatus Insect species that have evolved Bt resistance in the laboratory Lepidoptera Coleoptera Ö Plodia interpunctella Ö Leptinotarsa decemlineata Ö Heliothis virescens Ö Chrysomela scripta Ö Helicoverpa armigera Cotton pests Ö Pectinophora gossypiella Diptera Ö Spodoptera exigua Ö Culex quinquefasciatus Ö Spodoptera littoralis Ö Trichoplusia ni Corn pest Ö Ostrinia nubilalis Ö Plutella xylostella Insect species that have evolved Bt resistance in the field Lepidoptera Ö Plodia interpunctella Ö Heliothis virescens Ö Helicoverpa armigera Ö Pectinophora gossypiella Ö Spodoptera exigua Ö Spodoptera littoralis Ö Trichoplusia ni Ö Ostrinia nubilalis Ö Plutella xylostella Coleoptera Ö Leptinotarsa decemlineata Ö Chrysomela scripta Diptera Ö Culex quinquefasciatus Global area of Bt crops Global area of Bt crops (million Ha) 24 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Year Any type of Bt plants Only insect resistance Bt/herbicide res. plants Strategies for resistance management in Bt crops ÖHigh expression of the Bt transgene to ensure that all heterozygotes are killed. ÖTemporal rotation of cultivars expressing different Bt genes. ÖExpression, in the same plant, of more than one Bt gene (“pyramided” plants). ÖUse of refuges with nontransformed plants (to permit a certain part of the population to escape selection). Ö Application of spatial mosaics of cultivars expressing different Bt genes. Strategies for resistance management in Bt crops ÖHigh expression of the Bt transgene to ensure that all heterozygotes are killed. ÖTemporal rotation of cultivars expressing different Bt genes. ÖExpression, in the same plant, of more than one Bt gene (“pyramided” plants). ÖUse of refuges with nontransformed plants (to permit a certain part of the population to escape selection). Ö Application of spatial mosaics of cultivars expressing different Bt genes. The high-dose/refuge strategy: Requirements Ö Inheritance of resistance recessive or partially recessive. ÖToxin concentration in plants high enough to kill all heterozygotes. ÖRandom mating between resistant and susceptible insects. Ö Low initial frequency of the resistance allele. Strategies for resistance management in Bt crops ÖHigh expression of the Bt transgene to ensure that all heterozygotes are killed. ÖTemporal rotation of cultivars expressing different Bt genes. ÖExpression, in the same plant, of more than one Bt gene (“pyramided” plants). ÖUse of refuges with nontransformed plants (to permit a certain part of the population to escape selection). Ö Application of spatial mosaics of cultivars expressing different Bt genes. The combination of two toxins strategy: Requirements Ö Resistance to one toxin must not confere crossresistance to the other toxin (i.e., different modes of action of the two toxins). Ö Lower fitness associated to resistance alleles in the absence of selection pressure (to permit reversion of resistance). Ö Low initial frequency of the resistance alleles. Bacillus thuringiensis: mode of action ingestion proteolytic activation solubilisation receptor binding PM crossing pore formation Binding site model in P. xylostella Cry1Aa Cry1Ab Cry1Ac Cry1F Cry1J Cry1B Cry1C Alteration of the shared receptor was associated to resistance to the 5 toxins in strains NO-QA and PEN Biochemical basis of crossresistance in Lepidoptera ÖThe pattern found in Plutella xylostella seems also to apply to most lepidopterans: Herrero, González-Cabrera, Tabashnik and Ferré (2001). Shared binding sites in Lepidoptera for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ja and Cry1A toxins. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 5729-5734. Hernández and Ferré (2005). Common receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis toxins Cry1Ac, Cry1Fa, and Cry1Ja in Helicoverpa armigera, Helicoverpa zea, and Spodoptera exigua. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 5627-5629. Cross-resistance to Cry1Aa, Cry1Ab, Cry1F and Cry1J was also found in Cry1Ac-selected H. virescens Mechanisms of resistance to Bt 1) Reduced binding Plodia interpunctella (3 strains) Plutella xylostella (8 strains) Heliothis virescens (3 strains) Pectinophora gossypiella (1 strain) Helicoverpa armigera (1 strain) Trichoplusia ni (1 strain) Ostrinia nubilalis (1 strain) 2) Altered proteolytic processing Plodia interpunctella (1 strain) Heliothis virescens (2 strains) Plutella xylostella (1 strain) Ostrinia nubilalis (1 strain) 3) Faster cell repair/replacement Heliothis virescens (1 strain) 4) Elevated immune response High levels of resistance but narrow spectrum Low levels of resistance but broad spectrum Ephestia kuehniella (1 strain) Helicoverpa armigera (1 strain) 5) Toxin sequestering by esterases Helicoverpa armigera (1 strain) Plutella xylostella (1 strain) Classification of Bt resistance Ö An approach to classify the different cases of resistance to Bt toxins was proposed in 1998 by Tabashnik et al. (Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353: 1751-6). Ö “Mode 1” resistance is characterized by: 1. 2. 3. 4. Extremely high resistance to at least one Cry1A toxin Recessive inheritance Little or no cross-resistance to Cry1C Reduced binding to at least one Cry1A toxin Ö “Type I” binding site alteration: when binding of only one Cry1A toxin is affected Ö “Type II” binding site alteration: when the alteration affects binding of the 3 Cry1A toxins Ö Different mechanisms Ö Different genes or alleles Candidate genes for Bt resistance Ö Trypsin-like proteinase Ö Chymotrypsin-like proteinase? Ö Cadherin Ö Aminopeptidase N Ö Alkaline phosphatase Ö Enzymes in the glycosylation pathway of membrane glycoproteins or glycolipids Ö Esterase genes? Ö Genes involved in the immune response? Genetic evidence as resistance genes Ö Trypsin-like proteinase (in insects) Ö Chymotrypsin-like proteinase? Ö Cadherin (in insects) Ö Aminopeptidase N Ö Alkaline phosphatase Ö Enzymes in the glycosylation pathway of membrane glycoproteins or glycolipids (in C. elegans) Ö Esterase genes? Ö Genes involved in the immune response? Genetic evidence for involvement of trypsin proteinases in Bt resistance Ö Reduction of a trypsin-like proteinase has been linked to resistance in P. interpunctella: Oppert, Kramer, Beeman, Johnson and McGaughey (1997). Proteinase-mediated insect resistance to Bt toxins. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 23473-76. Ö Decreased expression of a trypsin-like proteinase gene has been observed in Ostrinia nubilalis: Li, Oppert, Higgins, Huang, Buschman, Gao and Zhu (2005). Characterization of cDNAs encoding three trypsin-like proteinases and mRNA quantitative analysis in Bt-resistant and –susceptible strains of Ostrinia nubilalis. IBMB 35:847-60 Genetic evidence for involvement of cadherin receptors in Mode 1 resistance Ö Genes for cadherin-like proteins have been linked to resistance in H. virescens, P. gossypiella and H. armigera: Gahan, Gould and Heckel (2001). Identification of a gene associated with Bt resistance in Heliothis virescens. Science 293: 857-60. Morin et al. (2003). Three cadherin alleles associated with resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in pink bollworm. PNAS 100: 5004-09. Xu, Yu and Wu (2005). Disruption of a cadherin gene associated with resistance to Cry1Ac δendotoxin of Bt in Helicoverpa armigera. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 948-54 Ö Lack of binding is not been linked to the cadherin gene in P. xylostella: Baxter, Zhao, Gahan, Shelton, Tabashnik and Heckel (2005) Novel genetic basis of fieldevolved resistance to Bt toxins in P. xylostella. Insect Mol. Biol. 14:327-34 Appl. to resistance management 1. Type of inheritance 2. Type of resist. mechanism 3. Gene identification Autosomal/sex-linked Recessive/dominant Monogenic/polygenic Broad/narrow spectrum Protoxin/toxin effective Biochemical characterisation Linkage analysis Identification of mutation Dev. of DNA-based probes Appl. to resistance management 1. Type of inheritance Autosomal/sex-linked Recessive/dominant Monogenic/polygenic 2. Type of resist. mechanism Broad/narrow spectrum Protoxin/toxin effective Biochemical characterisation 3. Gene identification Linkage analysis Identification of mutation Dev. of DNA-based probes Appl. to resistance management 1. Type of inheritance Autosomal/sex-linked Recessive/dominant Monogenic/polygenic 2. Type of resist. mechanism Broad/narrow spectrum Protoxin/toxin effective Biochemical characterisation 3. Gene identification Linkage analysis Identification of mutation Dev. of DNA-based probes Conclusion Bt resistance may be conferred by a variety of mechanisms. The challenge is to determine those playing a major role in the insect population under study to apply the appropriate measures