* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Moral Theory
Euthyphro dilemma wikipedia , lookup
Paleoconservatism wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of eating meat wikipedia , lookup
Virtue ethics wikipedia , lookup
Thomas Nagel wikipedia , lookup
Kantian ethics wikipedia , lookup
Utilitarianism wikipedia , lookup
Bernard Williams wikipedia , lookup
Ethics in religion wikipedia , lookup
Divine command theory wikipedia , lookup
Individualism wikipedia , lookup
Internalism and externalism wikipedia , lookup
The Sovereignty of Good wikipedia , lookup
The Moral Landscape wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Cultural relativism wikipedia , lookup
Alasdair MacIntyre wikipedia , lookup
Lawrence Kohlberg wikipedia , lookup
Moral disengagement wikipedia , lookup
Critique of Practical Reason wikipedia , lookup
Ethical intuitionism wikipedia , lookup
Moral development wikipedia , lookup
Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development wikipedia , lookup
Morality and religion wikipedia , lookup
Morality throughout the Life Span wikipedia , lookup
Moral responsibility wikipedia , lookup
Thomas Hill Green wikipedia , lookup
Consequentialism wikipedia , lookup
Review Facts – the way things actually are (sometimes called objective reality) Truth – a statement that matches the facts (an accurate representation of the way things are) ◦ Objective truths – represent objective facts ◦ Relative truths – statement can only be evaluated relative to some other state of affairs Belief – an opinion; a statement the believer thinks is true Can a belief be false? Proof – evidence or reasons that establish that a statement is true. Can a belief be true but not proven? Should moral beliefs be evaluated on objective standards or relative to something else? Ethical Objectivists believe that there are objective (universally valid) moral standards. According to this theory the truth of at least some moral claims is objective. An extreme version of Objectivism Absolutists claim moral principals have no exceptions and are independent of context. Most objectivist theories are not absolutist. Ethical Relativism – the claim that there are no objective moral principles. ◦ The truth of all moral claims is relative to the beliefs of the individual or their culture. Social relativism: The truth of moral principles is determined by social choice (e.g., cultural norms) Individual relativism: The truth of moral principles is determined by the individual’s beliefs and choices If relativism were an accurate account of the nature of morality: Any behavior could be justified as morally right Questions about right and wrong could be answered with opinion polls Inter-societal moral judgments would be impossible Revolutionaries would always be wrong Moral progress would be impossible Good reasoners recognize their own fallibility Objectivism does not entail forcing others to accept one’s beliefs Appealing to the principle of tolerance is an appeal to an objective moral principle. Assuming morality is objective, how do you determine what is right or wrong? The goal of moral theory is to develop a systematic way of determining what makes an action right or wrong. Morality is based on the outcome (i.e. consequences) Consequentialism is not egoistic Utilitarianism is a type of consequentialism Consequentialists weigh likely positive and negative consequences to determine the right action. Consequentialist reasoning is quite common Consequentialist reasoning is “fair” It seems to make morality clear cut But it can very difficult to predict and weigh the consequences It is often oversimplified or improperly used to rationalize choices ◦ Consequentialists must be very careful to consider all of the consequences for all those affected. Consequentialism does not allow for “special obligations” (lifeboat example) Sometimes consequentialism seems to validate actions that are clearly wrong. (forced organ donor example) Morality is based on duties/obligations/principles rather than consequences Kant was a deontologist. ◦ The categorical imperative: Act only on that principle whereby you can will that it become a universal law. ◦ Applies universally because of human dignity Fidelity Veracity Autonomy Beneficence Nonmaleficence Justice Where do the principles come from? ◦ All deontological theories have to face the difficulty of defending and justifying their principles When principles conflict: how does one determine which takes precedence? Originated with Aristotle Focuses on the individual’s character rather than her or his particular actions Virtues are dispositions/habits -- you have to work to get them There is no definitive list of virtues, but some possibilities are: wisdom, courage, compassion, generosity Character plays a key role in making good choices, but you still need some way to determine which choices are the right ones. Virtue ethics provides limited guidance in moral decision making Traditional theories have been criticized for being “cold” Some theorists suggest that human relations are not cold and abstract They suggest that moral emotions such as care and empathy should be included in the considerations about right action. (e.g., warm and cold doctors) There is not one established theory to guide our choices. Reasoned choices require that the moral agent consider consequences and duties in a caring and empathetic way.