* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Chap 6 Forcing and feedback
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the Arctic wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Chapter 6 Radiative forcing and climate feedbacks Recall: equation … Ts = [(S(1-α)(n+1)]/(4 σ)]1/4 Humans are increasing “n” … expected to cause warming Other factors: 6.1 Timelag Pot on the stove doesn’t boil immediately. Earth does not warm up immediately (SHC of ocean, land) Planet has not yet reached equilibrium with what we’ve already emitted (Each CO2 molecule lasts hundreds of years in the atmosphere) Ein > Eout by about 0.9 W/m2 Committed warming = 0.5 K; unavoidable Timelag: as increase n, Ein > Eout for a few decades (presently 0.9 W/m2 Decades for temperature increase (70% water) 6.2 Radiative forcing Imagine that the sun suddenly becomes brighter … what happens? (a) Zero layer atmosphere 238 W/m2 in and out; suddenly, Ein increases to 243 W/m2 (5 W/m2 increase) Eout does not immediately change, meaning that Ein > Eout Oceans cause response lag; eventually Ein = Eout Climate change: global temperature adjusts until Ein = Eout Lag of decades has important policy consequences Radiative forcings: imposed changes on Ein or Eout (unconnected with surface temp) Planet’s T must change to reestablish energy balance Define: RF = ΔEin - ΔEout : positive radiative forcings warm the planet Ex 1: How much does Ein change if S increases by 5%? Answer: Ein = 1360(1-0.3)/4 = 238; Ein=1360*1.05*(1-0.3)/4=250; change = 12 W/m2. Note: time independent Ex 2: What increase in solar constant would cause a radiative forcing of +1 W/m2 ? (zero-layer planet with equilibrium temperature of 300 K) Note: +4 W/m2 is the RF for doubled CO2 What other factors can cause radiative forcing? Total radiative forcing between 1750 and 2005 Factors 1. Aerosols: particles so small they have negligible fall speed Burning coal increases aerosol sulfates Highly reflecting, increases albedo cools climate (-0.5 W/m2 ) Indirect aerosol effect: sulfates combine with water to form droplets within clouds Increases reflectivity of clouds (-0.7 W/m2) Don’t stay in the atmosphere too long, so they are mainly near their sources Efforts to clean up air pollution will reduce the amount of aerosols in the atmosphere, and therefore increase radiative forcing 2. Black carbon or soot comes from incomplete combustion; absorbs sunlight & IR; reduces albedo and increases “n” warms climate 3. CO2 forcing: from 280->380 ppm 4. CH4 forcing: from 0.8->1.8 ppm Total GHGs = +3 W/m2 : CO2 is about +1.6 W/m2 Total Aerosols = -1.2 W/m2 (-0.5 W/m2 direct, -0.7 W/m2 indirect) 40%offset Total net forcing = +1.6 W/m2 Net human RF is +1.6 W/m2 Aerosol reflectivity as a function of latitude and longitude Example of radiative forcing; sulfur gases from volcanic eruptions Radiative forcing from volcanoes (1880-2000) Summary RF is an imposed energy imbalance to the climate system. In response, the temperature of the planet will change Defined as the change in planetary energy imbalance before system has responded. Total RF = +1.6 W/m2 Earth has warmed up about 0.8°C, 2/3rds of the energy imbalance wiped out. Present energy imbalance is about 0.5 W/m2. Not finished warming from previous emissions — another 0.5 K of committed warming. Problem: calculate T for planet with Ein = 238 W/m2 (254.5 K) and for Ein = 242 W/m2 (255.6 K); a warming of 1.1 K What is Eout for the planet? sigma(255)^4 = 239.74 W/m2 What is Ein for the planet? also 239.74 W/m2 Hence: +4 W/m2 RF is applied … Ein increases to 243.74 W/m2, so Eout also increases (eventually). New temperature is (243.74/sigma)^(1/4) = 256 K … +1 K increase Note: RF of doubled CO2 is +4 W/m2 6.3 Feedbacks Feedback processes amplify or ameliorate an initial perturbation Example: Zero-layer model (n = 0) with S = 2000 W/m2, α = 0.6. What is Ts? If S increases by 2% to 1.02(2000)=2040 W/m2. New Ts = ? S (W/m2) 2000 2040 α 0.6 0.6 T (K) 243.7 244.9 Increase in S leads to a T increase of 1.2 K However: other things do not remain the same … As T increases -> ice melts -> albedo decreases -> more solar energy is absorbed -> T increase -> loop back to ice melts: Positive feedback loop Let’s assume that α(T) = 0.6-(T-243.7)/150. T4=S(1-α(T))/4 ; 4th-order polynomial. S (W/m2) α T(K) 2000 2040 0.6 0.6 0.595 0.592 0.590 243.7 244.9 245.6 246.1 246.3 2040 0.588 246.6 Warming with the ice-albedo feedback is 2.9 K, compared to 1.2 K without it The ice-albedo feedback amplifies the perturbation due to S increase (positive feedback) Negative feedback; suppose two kinds of flowers cover the planet: black and white. As the climate warms, white flowers begin to take over regions previously covered by black flowers. Here reflectivity increases with warming. In general, now Ts = [ (n(Ts)+1).S(1-α(Ts))/(4σ)]1/4 This is what makes climate change hard to predict … Fast feedbacks: Ice-albedo (positive), water vapor (positive), clouds (uncertain) Water vapour: humidity increases with temperature i.e. warmer atmosphere can hold more water vapour Since water vapour = GHG, feeback loop Tropical water vapour tracks temperature as a function of time (2002-10) Cloud feedbacks; both positive and negative Sunlight reflected (cooling effect) IR absorption (heating effect) Net effect: currently negative (- 20 W/m2) Expect: net positive effect in the future… Slow feedbacks: occur over centuries Ice sheet response: v slow melting (?) Permafrost melting (Arctic): releases CO2 and methane Methane clathrates in ice (land and under oceans); methane release Carbon cycle feedback: Initial warming leads to release of frozen GHGs , more warming, further release Compare past warmings Feedbacks vs forcings: Feedbacks change Ein and Eout, but are responding to surface T; do not initiate Forcings change Ein and Eout, but are unconnected to surface warming Carbon dioxide (1750-2005): forcing Carbon dioxide (past climates): not forcing but positive feedback Future: once warming underway, carbon dioxide as feedback? 6.4 Climate sensitivity: Relates change in T to emission of a standard amount of CO2 Climate sensitivity = CO2 The standard CO2 is a doubling in conc. from 280 ppm (1850) to 560 ppm Doubling CO2 without feedbacks gives us about 1.2°C warming Some feedback math: Tf = Ti + g Ti + g2 Ti + g3 Ti … Tf = Σ gkTi Summing over the series Tf = Ti/(1-g) If g = 0, Tf = Ti If 0 < g < 1, Tf > Ti : positive feedback If g < 0, Tf < Ti : negative feedback If g approaches 1, Tf very large: runaway greenhouse effect Earth: g = gia (+0.1) + gwv (+0.6) + gcloud ( 0 to +0.3) + glr ( -0.3) Total feedback factor: g = [0.4 to 0.7] Applying this to the initial temperature perturbation of 1.2°C, get Tf = [2 to 4°C] - uncertainty related primarily to uncertainty in cloud feedbacks IPCC estimate Tf = [2°C to 4.5°C], with best estimate of 3°C. Very unlikely to be less than 1.5°C. Values substantially higher than 4.5°C possible. Recall: doubled CO2 has RF = +4 W/m2. Can express climate sensitivity as warming per unit RF units: [0.5 to 1.1] °C/(W/m2) or best estimate 0.75 K/(W/m2) Example: if solar constant increases by 5%, S = + 12 W/m2 For climate sensitivity of 0.75 K/(W/m2), get C Final Note : Sensitivity including “slow” feedbacks may be higher.