Download Ivy Mead 24 February 2011 Bioinformatics Lab report 3 The analysis

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

History of molecular evolution wikipedia , lookup

Western blot wikipedia , lookup

Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup

Protein (nutrient) wikipedia , lookup

Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Non-coding RNA wikipedia , lookup

Protein adsorption wikipedia , lookup

Promoter (genetics) wikipedia , lookup

Magnesium transporter wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression wikipedia , lookup

Genetic code wikipedia , lookup

Silencer (genetics) wikipedia , lookup

Mutation wikipedia , lookup

Protein structure prediction wikipedia , lookup

Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup

Endogenous retrovirus wikipedia , lookup

Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup

Molecular evolution wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Homology modeling wikipedia , lookup

Ancestral sequence reconstruction wikipedia , lookup

Structural alignment wikipedia , lookup

Telomerase wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Ivy Mead
24 February 2011
Bioinformatics
Lab report 3
The analysis for Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (TERT) has been done at the protein
level because the evaluation can provide a more clear distinction between those kind of
sequences. Because transcriptase is such an important protein for maintaining DNA quality, it is
less likely to change in monumental ways, at least in the mammalian structures. The ciliate and
yeast sequences are expected to be more different from the mammalian sequences because of the
longer time since divergence. Looking for important differences can be better done at the protein
level by avoiding problems with synonymous DNA mutation and that only 4 exchange values
versus 20 amino acid residues for exchange. The analysis for Telomerase RNA Component
(TERC) has been done at the nucleotide level because it is never translated into a protein.
For the TERT, the parameter of gap opening penalty is increased in anticipation that the
most of the sequences will be similar, because the protein is likely conserved. By increasing the
gap opening penalty, the program is more discriminate and provides a more stringent criteria for
the sequence alignment. Thus, the active sites of the protein should be easily found. For the
TERC the default SWAMI gap opening penalty has been used because the sequences are likely
less closely related for reasons stated in the former paragraph. A middle range alignment is best
for a component that is more likely to differ, although the standard should not be so low as to not
align the binding site. It is also important to note that the default gap penalty is not ideal for all
sequence alignments; it should only be used as a baseline and with caution.
The two components of telomerase can be quantitatively compared using alignment
scores. The alignment score for TERT was found to be 103905 and the alignment score for
TERC was found to be 67033. Thus, when comparing the two components with the alignment
score as the standard the TERC appears to be evolving more quickly because on average the
sequences are less closely aligned. Because the TERT alignment has a higher alignment score,
there are fewer mutations between sequences, even those that are not as recently related appear
to have fixed less mutations than the TERC sequences. Thus, it is highly likely that the TERC
sequence is fixing mutations at a higher rate than the TERT protein sequence.
The functional domain in TERC is approximately from 197 to 377 nucleotides in the
mammalian sequences. The two functional domains are approximately from 1473 to 2184
nucleotides and 2289 to 3153 nucleotides in the mammalian sequences. These were estimated by
looking for areas that were particularly conserved among a majority of the organisms selected.
The yeast and the ciliate sequences were significantly different from the mammalian sequences
even in the functional domains, but that is to be expected as they are less closely related and have
had more evolutionary time to diverge in sequence. Thus, it would be safe to assume that the
yeast and ciliate homologs of TERC and TERC have functional similarity but not evolutionary
similarity or structural similarity to the mammalian versions.
Paralogs of TERT exactly do not appear to exist that we know of; however, a paralog of
the yeast EST1 (a third component of the ribonucleoprotein telomerase complex) has been found
in humans called EST1A, which can affect telomere capping (Reichenbach et al., 2003). Another
study found a possible paralog in the Melanoma antigen family (MAGE) (Amin et al., 2009).
Paralogs of TERC are unlikely to occur unless they end up evolving alongside TERT, no
literature on the subject has been found.
Works Cited:
Amin, et al., (2009) In silico Analysis of Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (hTERT)
Gene: Identification of a Distant Homolog of Melanoma Antigen Family Gene (MAGE).
Cancer Inform. 7: 171–181.
Reichenbach, et al., (2003) A Human Homolog of Yeast Est1 Associates with Telomerase
and Uncaps Chromosome Ends When Overexpressed. Current Bio. 13: 568-574.