* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download LINK project: Genetic control of meat quality (LK0626)
Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup
Human genome wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup
Genetic testing wikipedia , lookup
Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SLP LINK Project LK0626 Genetic control of meat quality Start date: 01/10/1999 End date: 31/03/2003 Partners: Meat & Livestock Commission Roslin Institute Rowett Research Institute Sponsor: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food (now Defra) Aims and objectives The aim of this project was to develop genetic predictors of meat quality in pigs. Approach Candidates for genes controlling a variation in a trait of interest (e.g. meat quality) can be identified in two ways. From knowledge of the trait and the physiological mechanisms and processes thought to be involved – “physiological candidate genes” can be identified and tested. For example, meat quality can be assumed to be associated with the characteristics of muscle tissue. Therefore, genes known to be involved in the development of muscle might be considered as candidates. The alternative approach involves identifying candidate genes on the basis of their location, i.e. which chromosome they are found on and where on the chromosome. This second approach relies upon knowledge of the location of genes on pig chromosomes and methods for determining which chromosomal locations are associated with variation in the trait of interest. Results Developing embryos were isolated from Duroc and Large White pigs, muscle tissues were sampled and stored. Proteins and RNA (the messenger molecule that act as an intermediate between genes and proteins) were isolated. From comparisons of the proteins present in Duroc and Large White embryos of equivalent ages and from 1 comparisons of the gross morphology of the developing muscles we found some evidence of differences in the timing of some aspects of muscle development between the breeds. Regions on pig chromosomes 5 and 9 associated with variation in some meat quality parameters, including the ease with which the meat could be sheared, were identified in an earlier study. These regions, however, were only approximately defined, equivalent to defining the location of a house as being in London. Only a few genes had already been mapped to these locations in pigs at the start of the project. By exploiting knowledge of the equivalent region of the better characterised human genome (the organisation of genes, chromosomes and genomes is conserved amongst animals including pigs and humans) we were able to assign several more genes to the regions shown earlier to be associated with variation in meat quality. By characterising the DNA around these genes we were able to develop several new genetic markers (variable DNA sequences that can be tracked from parent to offspring) in the regions of interest. These new genetic markers allowed us to repeat the tests for association between the regions of interest and variation in meat quality. Unfortunately, rather than allowing us to map the genes responsible for the meat quality effects with greater precision, the analyses with the additional information provided by the new markers provide no compelling support for the original observations. On the basis of these genetic analyses we have no strong evidence for the hypothesis that the so-called ‘Duroc effect’ is controlled by a single major gene that confers improvements in meat quality, specifically tenderness, through differences in the fibre composition of Duroc muscles compared to muscles for other breeds. Potential benefits to the food chain and/or the environment: The identification of genetic determinants of meat quality would allow a simple genetic test for the desirable genetic variant to be developed. Such a test could be exploited to allow a rapid and targeted improvement of UK breeding stock and provide a test that gives quality assurance and allows appropriate processing of carcasses in the slaughter-house. Knowledge and technology transfer: The original research proposal was designed to build upon the results of previous studies that had suggested that the so-called ‘Duroc effect’ is controlled by a single 2 major gene that causes the fibre make-up of muscles in Duroc pigs to differ from those of other pig breeds with the meat derived from the muscle being more tender. Unfortunately, the results from this research project do not provide convincing support for this hypothesis. Nevertheless a small desk-based feasibility study is being undertaken with Genesis Faraday SPARK funding to examine how genetic markers for meat quality could be exploited by pig breeding companies. CONTACT Dr Alan Archibald Roslin Institute Roslin Midlothian EH25 9PS Tel: 0131 527 4200 Fax: 0131 440 0434 [email protected] 3