Download File - Querencia Institute

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia, lookup

Climate change, industry and society wikipedia, lookup

Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia, lookup

Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia, lookup

Public opinion on global warming wikipedia, lookup

Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia, lookup

Climate change feedback wikipedia, lookup

Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia, lookup

Solar radiation management wikipedia, lookup

Climate change and poverty wikipedia, lookup

Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia, lookup

Climate change in the United States wikipedia, lookup

Climate sensitivity wikipedia, lookup

Media coverage of global warming wikipedia, lookup

Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia, lookup

Climate change and agriculture wikipedia, lookup

Effects of global warming wikipedia, lookup

Global warming wikipedia, lookup

General circulation model wikipedia, lookup

Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia, lookup

Global warming hiatus wikipedia, lookup

Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia, lookup

Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia, lookup

Instrumental temperature record wikipedia, lookup

Politics of global warming wikipedia, lookup

Climate engineering wikipedia, lookup

Climate governance wikipedia, lookup

Climate change adaptation wikipedia, lookup

Global warming controversy wikipedia, lookup

Economics of global warming wikipedia, lookup

Fred Singer wikipedia, lookup

Climate change denial wikipedia, lookup

Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia, lookup

Michael E. Mann wikipedia, lookup

Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia, lookup

Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia, lookup

Climate resilience wikipedia, lookup

Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia, lookup

ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia, lookup

2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia, lookup

German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia, lookup

Myron Ebell wikipedia, lookup

Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia, lookup

Business action on climate change wikipedia, lookup

Transcript
Published on Saturday, April 2, 2011 by Rethinking Schools
Our Climate Crisis Is an Education Crisis
Rethinking Schools Editorial
In 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) wrote, “Warming of the
climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global
average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global
average sea level.” According to environmentalist Bill McKibben, unless we immediately begin
to change course and dramatically reduce the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere,
we may “lose forever the basic architecture of our planet,” with unimaginable consequences.
How well are schools equipping our students to confront the climate emergency?
Unfortunately, major social studies and science textbooks are, at best, inadequate and often
propagandistic. For example, the widely used Physical Science: Concepts in Action (Prentice
Hall) fails to address global warming until page 782. The few paragraphs Physical Science offers
seem designed more to sow doubt than to alert students to the urgency of the issue. The section
begins: “Human activities may also change climate over time.” In bold face, as the key to the
section, the text tells students: “One possible climate change is caused by the addition of carbon
dioxide and certain other gases into the atmosphere.” Possible? This line could have been written
by the coal industry. The section continues in language dripping with equivocation: “Carbon
dioxide emissions from motor vehicles, power plants, and other sources may contribute to global
warming.”
This ambiguity stands in stark contrast to the seriousness of the situation: What the earth
experienced in 2010 affixed an exclamation point to the 2007 IPCC report, offering glimpses of a
grim future. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2010 tied 2005
as the warmest year on record, capping the warmest decade on record. Last year, 19 nations set
all-time climate records—the most ever. Asia saw the hottest temperature ever recorded there:
128° F in Pakistan.
Although no single weather event can be ascribed to climate change, the scientific consensus is
that rising global temperatures increase the risk of catastrophic weather. The record heat wave in
Russia in the summer of 2010, with its accompanying wildfires, killed 15,000 people. The floods
in Pakistan, following unprecedented monsoon rains, submerged 20 percent of the country,
affecting 20 million people. In Niger, severe drought followed by flooding left more than
100,000 people homeless. And these examples represent just the tip of a melting iceberg.
At the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Cancun, Mexico, in November, island
nations like Tuvalu and Nauru pleaded with delegates to create binding greenhouse gas emission
reductions, and described how climate-induced rising oceans are literally drowning their lands.
And a special New York Times report on climate change and the oceans depicted science fiction–
like scenarios of what will likely happen this century if the oceans continue their inexorable rise.
On a recent Democracy Now! broadcast, Dr. Paul Epstein, associate director of the Center for
Health and the Global Environment at Harvard Medical School, warned about the dire public
health consequences of climate change. For example, he attributes the doubling and even tripling
of childhood asthma rates in the United States in part to climate change, as pollen counts
skyrocket in response to the rising concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Epstein
warns that warming and extreme weather are putting us at greater risk for infectious diseases and
respiratory ailments, and are disrupting crops, forests, and marine life.
If the purpose of education is to serve humanity, then this climate emergency should be
accompanied by widespread rethinking and revision of the curriculum—a massive undertaking
to equip children to understand the causes of the climate crisis and the enormity of its potential
consequences. But this is not happening. We detect little sense of urgency among educators—
even among many who consider ourselves “social justice” educators—to address the climate
crisis. In 2010, major journals like Educational Leadership and Phi Delta Kappan did not
include a single article about schools dealing with climate change.
Where Is Climate Change in Our Curriculum?
Educators need to begin to treat the climate crisis with the urgency it deserves as arguably the
most significant threat to life on earth.
We’re not suggesting that we adopt a shrill doomsday curriculum, but every educator at every
grade level in every discipline has a role to play. In early childhood, teachers can nurture an
ecological disposition, as Ann Pelo writes in Rethinking Early Childhood Education, aiming “to
give children a sense of place—to invite children to braid their identities together with the place
where they live by calling their attention to the air, the sky, the cracks in the sidewalk where the
earth busts out of its cement cage.” These dispositions can be deepened and expanded throughout
the elementary grades, as teachers help children become “citizen scientists,” as Lynne Cherry
and Gary Braasch propose in How We Know What We Know About Our Changing Climate.
Children can learn about “observing, measuring, and describing the natural world, and figuring
out how it works.”
The Need for Science Literacy
So much of the climate change deniers’ disinformation depends on a widespread scientific
illiteracy. “Global warming is just a theory” is tossed around as if a scientific theory were simply
a synonym for hunch or guess or belief, rather than a widely accepted explanation supported by
existing evidence. Gravity is also “just a theory.” Nurturing a foundation of scientific literacy can
inoculate children against the ersatz “science” pushed by energy corporations that pollutes our
culture. For example, see the material churned out by a coal industry front group like the
American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity.
The role of schools in establishing science literacy has deteriorated in the era of No Child Left
Behind, as schools have often left science instruction behind in an effort to boost test scores
toward making “adequate yearly progress.” And, of course, students’ grasp of the climate crisis
is not all that suffers from schools’ failure to lay a foundation of scientific literacy. Such a lack
also leaves students ill prepared to think clearly about everything from evolution to stem cell
research to nutrition.
In middle and high school the climate crisis is a kind of curricular hot potato that no discipline
wants to claim as its own. Social studies teachers—and a number of Rethinking Schools editors
count ourselves in this category—often bump up against their own shaky scientific
understandings, trying to recall what they learned about carbon dioxide, methane, or nitrous
oxide in high school and college chemistry classes. And science teachers may feel that analyzing
the social causes and consequences of climate change is beyond the scope of their curricula or of
their own knowledge. Or they may simply feel overwhelmed. One longtime science teacher
recently wrote us: “We see the problem clearly, but we can’t figure out how to do more than
scare our students.” Teachers in language arts, mathematics, world languages, business, physical
education, or art may wonder, “What does this have to do with my class?”
Challenging the Barriers
But in this moment of crisis, it’s imperative that we challenge these artificial barriers between
disciplines—and maybe our own despair. Educators across the curriculum need to collaborate to
develop students as the scientist-activists they need to be. And despite the looming risks to the
planet—or perhaps because of these—this can be exciting and joyful academic work.
Confronting the climate emergency requires us immediately to begin constructing a fossil fuel–
free society built on principles of ecology and justice, rather than profit and endless growth. This
endeavor demands that young people exercise their utopian imaginations to consider alternatives
of all kinds. And it invites them to “talk back” to those interests that promote and benefit from
endless consumption—including the publishers of their own textbooks.
We can do a lot in our individual classrooms—but not everything. We need our professional
organizations and school districts to provide professional development that is cross-disciplinary
and that deals forthrightly with the climate crisis. We need administrators and educational policy
makers to recognize that “skills” can and must be taught in the context of a curriculum about
things that matter, including the climate. We need our districts to demand curriculum materials,
including textbooks, that are honest and that equip students to understand what’s at stake. And if
the corporate giants continue to produce woefully inadequate texts, like the Prentice Hall text
mentioned above, then they should be boycotted, publicly and loudly.
For education activists this work is part of a broader struggle to critique and oppose the equation
of academic achievement with scoring well on tests. That schools seem to be sleepwalking
through the climate crisis is one indication of the overall lunacy of the data-chase that became
institutionalized in No Child Left Behind and embraced with gusto by the Obama administration.
In the introduction to her influential book, Other People’s Children, Lisa Delpit laments: “We
have given up the rich meaningful education of our children in favor of narrow,
decontextualized, meaningless procedures that leave unopened hearts, unformed character, and
unchallenged minds.”
The fight for a climate-relevant education is part of the broader fight for a critical, humane,
challenging, and socially responsive curriculum. It’s work that belongs to us all.
© 2011 Rethinking Schools