Download Title: Hereditary Gastric Cancer

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Epistasis wikipedia , lookup

NEDD9 wikipedia , lookup

Cancer epigenetics wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

BRCA mutation wikipedia , lookup

Frameshift mutation wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Mutagen wikipedia , lookup

Mutation wikipedia , lookup

Point mutation wikipedia , lookup

Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Title: Hereditary Gastric Cancer: Beyond E-cadherin (CDH1) mutation-causes
Importance. Familial aggregation occurs in approximately 10% of gastric cancers, which
are generally sub-classified histologically as intestinal-type and diffuse gastric cancers.
Though the genetic basis of familial intestinal-type gastric cancers is not known, in <50%
of families clinically defined as hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, germline mutations in
the E-cadherin gene, CDH1, are detected. This has lead to management guidelines and
prevention strategies for mutation carriers.
Objectives. To determine whether pathogenic germline mutations in genes alternative to
CDH1 can be found in hereditary gastric cancer families using a multiplex panel
sequencing approach.
Design, Setting and Participants. One hundred fifteen probands from families who met
the International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium clinical criteria for hereditary
diffuse gastric cancer (n=106) or familial intestinal-type gastric cancer (n=9) were
included. All diffuse gastric cancer probands tested negative for CDH1-mutations.
Germline DNA was screened against a custom panel of 55 genes, including 14
prospective gastric cancer susceptibility genes, using a multiplexed amplicon-based next
generation sequencing assay. Candidate mutations were validated via Sanger sequencing.
Tumours from pathogenic mutation-positive probands were evaluated by
immunohistochemistry.
Results. Of 115 probands, four clearly pathogenic truncating mutations were identified
in unrelated families, including two different mutations in CTNNA1 (alpha-catenin) and
two different mutations in BRCA2. Previously described, functionally pathogenic
missense mutations in SDHB (2 families) and STK11 (2 families) were also seen.
Additional truncating mutations of likely lower penetrance were identified in ATM (4
families), MSR1 (2 families) and PALB2 (1 family). Cancers from carriers of CTNNA1
truncating variants had prominent loss of protein expression, further supporting their
pathogenicity.
Conclusion and Relevance. Using a multi-gene panel, we showed that families with
hereditary gastric cancer carry pathogenic mutations in genes commonly associated with
other cancer susceptibility syndromes. In addition, this data suggests that familial gastric
cancers, specifically hereditary diffuse gastric cancer subtype, should be genetically and
not clinically defined. The genetic basis of the remaining families is likely attributable to
mutations in genes yet to be implicated in gastric cancer or, in the true diffuse gastric
cancer families, atypical aberrations in the non-coding regions of CDH1.