* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Chapter 4 Syntax
Construction grammar wikipedia , lookup
Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup
Untranslatability wikipedia , lookup
Dependency grammar wikipedia , lookup
Agglutination wikipedia , lookup
Integrational theory of language wikipedia , lookup
Focus (linguistics) wikipedia , lookup
Serbo-Croatian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Macedonian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Portuguese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Musical syntax wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive semantics wikipedia , lookup
French grammar wikipedia , lookup
Sloppy identity wikipedia , lookup
Japanese grammar wikipedia , lookup
English clause syntax wikipedia , lookup
Scottish Gaelic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Vietnamese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup
Morphology (linguistics) wikipedia , lookup
Chinese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Romanian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Esperanto grammar wikipedia , lookup
Polish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Malay grammar wikipedia , lookup
Determiner phrase wikipedia , lookup
Preposition and postposition wikipedia , lookup
Junction Grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lexical semantics wikipedia , lookup
Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup
Antisymmetry wikipedia , lookup
• Where are you from? – 你从哪里来? – You are from where? • 你是谁 – You are who? – Who are you? – Who do you think you are? What is a Sentence? • A string of random words? • If it is a sentence, does it have to be meaningful? Grammaticality • Grammatical vs. ungrammatical – well formed vs. ill formed – words must conform to specific patterns determined by the syntactic rules of the language • based on – syntactic rules • NOT based on – what is taught in school – whether it is meaningful – whether you have heard the sentences before. 4.1 Introduction • What is syntax? • It is a branch of linguistics that studies how words are combined to form sentences and the rules that govern the formation of sentences. • The syntax of a language is the structure and ordering of components within a sentence. • 句法(syntax)这个单词,来自希腊语,由两 个语素构成:{syn}和{tax}。 {syn}的意思是“一 起、共同”, {tax} 的意思是“安排、排列”, 因此syntax本来是“排列在一起”或“组合” 的意思。(胡,2002, P.91) What can you tell from these four sentences? *Cries fear the the blackbird the hunter. a. b. c. d. The hunter fears the cries of the blackbirds. The blackbirds fears the cries of the hunter. Jack looked up the word. Jack looked the word up. The meaning of sentence depends on meaning of words and words order. • Sequences of words that observe the rules of syntax are said to be well formed or grammatical and those which violate the syntactic rules are therefore ill formed and ungrammatical. 1. Syntactic relations • Syntactic relations can be analysed into three kinds: – relations of position – relations of substitutability – relations of co-occurrence 7 1.1 Relations of Position • For language to fulfill its communicative function, it must have a way to mark the grammatical roles of the various phrases that can occur in a clause. • The boy kicked the ball NP1 NP2 Subject Object 8 • Positional relation, or WORD ORDER, refers to the sequential arrangement of words in a language. – If the words in a sentence fail to occur in a fixed order required by the convention of a language, one tends to produce an utterance either ungrammatical or nonsensical at all. • For example, 9 • The boy kicked the ball – *Boy the ball kicked the – *The ball kicked the boy • The teacher saw the students • The students saw the teacher 10 • Positional relations are a manifestation of one aspect of Syntagmatic Relations observed by F. de Saussure. – They are also called Horizontal Relations or simply Chain Relations. 11 • Word order is among the three basic ways (word order, genetic and areal classifications) to classify languages in the world: – SVO, VSO, SOV, OVS, OSV, and VOS. – English belongs to SVO type, though this does not mean that SVO is the only possible word order. 12 Basic sentence types: Quirk • SVC • • • • • • Mary is kind. a nurse. SVA Mary is here. in the house. SV The child is laughing. SVO Somebody caught the ball. SVOC We have proved him wrong. a fool. SVOA I put the plate on the table. SVOO She gives me expensive presents. 13 1.2 Relation of Substitutability • The Relation of Substitutability refers to classes or sets of words substitutable for each other grammatically in sentences with the same structure. – The ______ smiles. man boy girl 14 • It also refers to groups of more than one word which may be jointly substitutable grammatically for a single word of a particular set. – The strong man tallest boy pretty girl – He went there smiles. yesterday. last week. the day before. 15 • This is also called Associative Relations by Saussure, and Paradigmatic Relations by Hjemslev. – To make it more understandable, they are called Vertical Relations or Choice Relations. 16 1.3 Relation of Co-occurrence • It means that words of different sets of clauses may permit, or require, the occurrence of a word of another set or class to form a sentence or a particular part of a sentence. – For instance, a nominal phrase can be preceded by a determiner and adjective(s) and followed by a verbal phrase. 17 • Relations of co-occurrence partly belong to syntagmatic relations, partly to paradigmatic relations. 18 4.2 Categories • 传统认为句子是词的序列。因此句子构造的研 究涉及了对词的大量研究。(胡,2002:91) • Category, Parts of speech, word class (p 71) • Nouns • Adjectives • Verbs • Adverbs • Prepositions • Pronouns • Conjunctions Categories 范畴 • 这些词类和功能有时叫做“范畴”。但是“范畴” 这个术语,更专门用于表示像名词、动词这些单位 的特性。 (胡,2002:91) • Category refers to a group of linguistic items which fulfill the same or similar functions in a particular language such as a sentence, a noun phrase or a verb. The most central categories to the syntactic study are the word-level categories (traditionally, parts of speech) Syntactic categories Lexical categories Phrasal categories Lexical categories Open lexical categories • nouns • verbs • adjectives • Adverbs Closed lexical categories • Pronouns • prepositions • Auxiliary verbs • determiners (articles, demonstratives, quantifiers) Phrasal categories • Verb phrase (VP) • Noun phrase (NP) • Prepositional phrase (PP) 4.2 Word-level categories Category refers to a group of linguistic items which fulfill the same or similar functions in a particular language. Traditionally, category is termed as “parts of speech”. 4.2.1 Major lexical categories and minor lexical categories: Examples of some lexical categories Major lexical categories Examples Noun (N) Verb (V) Adjective (A) Preposition (P) book, boy, love, sheep run, read, play happy, tall, clear about, over, on Minor lexical categories Examples Determiner (Det) Degree word (Deg) Qualifier (Qual) Auxiliary (Aux) Conjunction (Con) the, a, this, those quite, very, more, so often, always, seldom, almost must, should, can, might and, but, or 4.2.2 Three criteria To Determine a word’s category, three criteria are usually played. ① Word category often bear some relationship with its meaning. ② Words of different categories take different inflections. ③ Distribution means a certain type of elements can co-occur with a certain word. Meaning: John, pen, book, pretty lady, left quietly Inflection: plural affixes, tenses, degrees Distribution: the girl, a card, should stay, will help 4.2.2 Phrase categories Definition: A word or group of words written or spoken as a unit and separated by pauses or other junctures. Types: Noun phrase Eg: (NP): the pretty girl Verb phrase (VP): often dream Adjective phrase (AP): very pessimistic Prepositional phrase (PP): in the house Adverbial phrase (ADVP) : very quickly Phrases that are formed of more than one word usually contain the elements: Head, specifier (标志语) and complement. 4.3 Phrase structure (PS) rules • What are PS rules? – How words of different parts of speech are connected. • Different languages have different PS rules – English • An adjective is placed before a noun. – A beautiful woman – French • An adjective is placed either before or after a noun. • Une belle femme ‘a beautiful woman’ • Une femme fatale ‘an attractive woman’ Writing PS Rules Books • NP->N • Read: An NP is composed of a noun. A book • NP -> Det N John’s book • NP -> Pos N Good books; a good book • NP -> Det Adj N • NP -> Adj N • NP -> (Det) (adj) N Books on the table • NP -> N (PP) The PS rule of an NP • NP -> (Det) (adj) N (PP) Phrase structure (PS) rules in English • • • • • • NP -> (Det) (adj) N (PP) NP -> Pronoun VP -> ? AP -> ? PP -> ? CP -> COMP (that) S – COMP: complementizer=that, if, unless • S -> ? Phrase structure (PS) rules in English NP -> (Det) (adj) N (PP) NP -> pronoun VP -> V (NP) (PP) (CP) AP -> Adj (PP) PP -> P NP CP -> COMP (that) S • COMP: complementizer=that, if, unless S -> NP (Aux) VP 4.3 Phrase structure rule Introduction: NP VP AP PP (Det) (Qual) (Deg) (Deg) N V A P (PP) (NP) (PP) (NP) … … … … (Note: “ ” means “consist of”; ( ) means “can be omitted”; “…” means other complement options are available) 4.3.1 XP rule ( X stands for the head N, V, A or P) The XP rule: XP (specifier) X (complement) XP Specifier XP (Phrase level) X head Complement XP Xˉ Theory a. XP b. Xˉ (specifier) Xˉ X (complement) Specifier X Head Complement XP (Phrase level) Note: The phrase structure rules canXˉbe summed up Specifier Complement X(head) in which as XP rule shown in the diagram, X stands for N, V, A or P. 4.3.2 Coordination rule The structures are formed by joining two or more elements of the same type with the help of conjunction such as and or or. X X * Con X X stands for “a category at any structural level”; * indicates that one or more category s can occur to the left of the Con (conjunction). Coordination Rule 并列原则 • Coordination structures-----the structures that are formed by joining two or more elements of the same type with the help of a conjunction such as and, or, etc. ----Coordination has four important properties: • no limit on the number of coordinated categories before the conjunction; • a category at any level can be coordinated; • the categories must be of the same type; • the category type of the coordinate phrase is identical to the category type of the elements being conjoined. Coordination • Coordination is a common syntactic pattern in English and other languages formed by grouping together two or more categories of the same type with the help of a conjunction such as and, but and or . – These two or more words or phrases or clauses have equivalent syntactic status, each of the separate constituents can stand for the original construction functionally. 37 • Coordination of NPs: – [NP the lady] or [NP the tiger] • Coordination of VPs: – [VP go to the library] and [VP read a book ] • Coordination of PPs: – [PP down the stairs] and [PP out the door ] • Coordination of APs: – [AP quite expensive] and [AP very beautiful] • Coordination of Ss: – [S John loves Mary] and [S Mary loves John too]. 38 Recursion 递归 • Recursive rule: a rule which can be applied repeatedly without any definite limit. • 递归规则:句子可以无限重复应用的规则。 Recursiveness • Recursiveness mainly means that a phrasal constituent can be embedded within another constituent having the same category, but it has become an umbrella term such important linguistic phenomena as coordination and subordination, conjoining and embedding, hypotactic and paratactic. – All these are means to extend sentences. – How long can a sentence be? 40 • Theoretically, there is no limit to the embedding of one relative clause into another relative clause, so long as it does not become an obstacle to successful communication. • The same holds true for nominal clauses and adverbial clauses. – I met a man who had a son whose wife sold cookies that she had baked in her kitchen that was fully equipped with electrical appliances that were new … 41 • • • • John’s sister John’s sister’s husband John’s sister’s husband’s uncle John’s sister’s husband’s uncle’s daughter, etc. • • • • that house in Beijing the garden of that house in Beijing the tree in the garden of that house in Beijing a bird on the tree in the garden of that house in Beijing 42 Conjoining • Conjoining: coordination. • Conjunctions: and, but, and or. – John bought a hat and his wife bought a handbag. – Give me liberty or give me death. 43 Embedding • Embedding: subordination. • Main clauses and subordinate clauses. • Three basic types of subordinate clauses: – Relative clause: I saw the man who had visited you last year. – Complement clause: I don’t know whether Professor Li needs this book. – Adverbial clause: If you listened to me, you wouldn't make mistakes. 44 Sentential Connection • Hypotactic (subordinate clauses): – You can phone the doctor if you like. However, I very much doubt whether he is in. – We live near the sea. So we enjoy a healthy climate. • Paratactic (coordinate clauses): – In Guangzhou it is hot and humid during the summer. In Beijing it is hot and dry. – He dictated the letter. She wrote it. – The door was open. He walked in. 45 4.4 Phrase elements • Specifier • Head • Complement 4.4.1 Specifiers • Semantically, specifiers make more precise the meaning of the head; • syntactically, they typically mark a phrase boundary. • Specifiers can be determiners as in NP, qulifiers as in VP and degree words as in AP. 4.4.2 Complements • Complements themselves can be a phrase, they provide information abut entities and locations whose existence is implied by the meaning of the head, • e.g. a story about a sentimental girl; There can be no complement, one complement, or more than one complement in a phrase, e.g. appear, break, put…; • a sentence-like construction may also function as a complement such as in “I believed that she was innocent. I doubt if she will come. They are keen for you to show up.” That/if /for are complementizers, • the clauses introduced by complementizers are complement clause. 4.4.3 Modifiers 修饰语 • Modifiers specify optionally expressible properties of heads. 4.4 Phrase elements Specifiers: They help make more precise the meaning of head, and are attached top level of phrase structures, to the left of the head. Complements: They provide information about entities and locations. The information about a word’s complement is included in the head and termed subcategorization. Revised XP rule: XP (specifier) X (complement *) Examples of some As, Ns, and Ps permitting CP complements (CP = Complement Phrase) Items Heads Examples Adjectives afraid, certain, aware I was afraid that nobody would believe me. Nouns fact, claim, belief She can’t believe the fact that she would fail in the exam. Prepositions over, about They argued over whether she had come to class. 4.4.3 Modifiers: Modifier position in English Modifier Position Example AP precedes the head A very careful girl PP follows the head open with care AdvP precedes or follows the head read carefully; carefully read • After the phrase Constituent Structure Grammar • A grammar which analyzes sentences using only the idea of constituency, which reveals a hierarchy of structural levels, is referred to as a constituent structure grammar(成分结构语 法). • Constituent structure is also named as phrase structure. 4.4.2 Immediate constituent analysis (IC analysis) • Linguistic units can be parts of larger constructions(结构体) and may themselves also be constructions composed of smaller parts. Using the distribution of components and constructions, we can analyze a sentenceconsidered to be the maximum construction in syntax—into a series of constituents(成分)—units that make up their larger units next to them. • Immediate constituents and ultimate constituents Immediate constituents and ultimate constituents • 直接成分,是直接位于结构体层面之下的 成分,这个结构体可能是个句子,如Poor John ran away, 也可能是个词组, 如poor John。 从理论上讲,结构体也可以是一个单词。 一个单词也可以分析出直接成分—语素如 lovely可以分析出{love}和{ly}。 • 最后一层的成分即语素,叫做最终成分。 (胡,2002:97) • 实际上为了方便,我们通常切到词为止。 Immediate constituent analysis • How to divide constituents? • How to show IC structure? • Tree-diagram A Tree Diagram S VP NP Det NP N PP V Det P The boy N N from Taiwan knew the answer What does a tree diagram show? • Speakers’ syntactic knowledge of sentence structure – the linear order of the words – the categorization of words into particular syntactic categories (i.e. constituents) – the hierarchical structure of the syntactic categories What can tree diagrams explain? • Structural ambiguity Structural ambiguity • A sentence may have two interpretations due to different structural compositions of constituents. • Example : – The boy left Mary with a broken heart. Structural ambiguity S NP Det VP N NP V N PP P The boy left Mary with NP a broken heart Structural ambiguity (2) S NP Det VP N V N The boy left PP NP Mary P NP with a broken heart Usage of IC analysis • to show up and distinguish ambiguities • The mother of the boy and the girl will arrive soon. • How do you distinguish the ambiguities in this sentence through tree diagram? The mother Tree diagram (1) of the boy and the girl will arrive soon. The mother of the boy and Tree diagram (2) the girl will arrive soon. 4. 5 Sentences (The S rule) Tree Diagram with labels 带标签树形图 • 1. S NP VP (binary cutting二元切分) S VP NP Det A The NP N boy man V found bought Det the a N evidence car. 2. Verb center S NP Art The V N man bought NP Art N a car. 3. S NP infl VP InflP(=S) NP VP Infl Many linguists believe that sentences, like other phrases, also have their own heads. Infl is an abstract category inflection (dubbed ‘Infl’) as their heads, which indicates the sentence’s tense and agreement. Infl realized by a tense label InflP ( =S ) VP NP Det A NP N Infl boy Pst V found Det the N evidence Infl realized by an auxiliary InflP ( =S ) VP NP NP Det A N Infl boy will V find Det the N evidence Exercise: • The boy will read the book. • John lost his pants. • This is a picture of Patton and me having a last-minute brawl(争吵) before the show. • These 7 people include astronauts coming from France and Russia. S The S rule S NP VP NP VP NP Infl Det N A boy V Det N found the purse Pst InflP (=S) (following the XP rule, with an internal structure) S VP NP Det A Infl N boy will NP V Det N buy the book 4.6 Transformational Grammar • Also transformational-generative grammar, TG. • Brief introduction in Chinese 生成语法 • 乔姆斯基用生成语法一词来简明地表示 “一套用来给句子进行结构描写、定义明 确严格的规则系统”。 • 乔姆斯基提出三个不同的平面来评价语法, 即“观察充分性”、“描写充分性”和 “解释充分性”。 Criteria on Good Grammar • • • • • Observational adequacy 观察充分性 Descriptive adequacy 描写充分性 Explanatory adequacy 解释充分性 The ultimate goal for any theory is to explain. TG differs from traditional grammar in that it not only aims at language description, but also its explanation. Transformations • • • • • 4.6.1 Auxiliary movement (inversion) 4.6.2 Do insertion 4.6.3 Deep structure & surface structure 4.6.4 Wh-movement 4.6.5 Move α and constraints on transformations 4.6.1 Auxiliary movement CP (Complement Phrase) Inversion: S C VP NP Det the Move Infl to the Left of the subject NP. N train Infl will V arrive Inversion (revised): Move Infl to C One application * The teacher wonders [CP if should his student _____ stay]. (Note: complementizers and auxiliaries are mutually exclusive) Auxiliary unchanged, trace and head movement 4.6.2 Do insertion Insert interrogative do into an empty Infl position. Then move the do to C position. Do insertion Do insertion(1) CP C Do insertion(2) N birds Infl S NP Infl V (do) S C S NP CP fly Do Infl N birds VP V e fly 4.6.3 Deep structure & surface structure • Consider the following pair of sentences: John is easy to please. John is eager to please. • Structurally similar sentences might be very different in their meanings, for they have quite different deep structures. Deep structure & surface structure • Consider one more sentence: – Flying planes can be dangerous. • It can mean either that if you fly planes you are engaged in a dangerous activity or Planes that are flying are dangerous. Deep Structure & Surface Structure • Deep structure ---- Formed by the XP rule in accordance with the head’s sub-categorization properties; it contains all the units and relationships that are necessary for interpreting the meaning of the sentence. • Surface structure ---- Corresponding to the final syntactic form of the sentence which results from appropriate transformations; it is that of the sentence as it is pronounced or written. The organization of the syntactic component The XP rule Deep structure Transformations Surface structure Subcategorization restricts choice of complements 4.6.3 Deep structure and surface structure ① The structure is the abstract representation of the syntactic properties of a construction, which is formed by the XP rule in accordance with the head’s sub-categorization properties. ② The surface structure is the final stage in the syntactic derivation of a construction, which closely corresponds to the structural organization of construction people actually produce and receive. The deep structure for the question: Will the train arrive? S can be given as below. VP NP Det the N train Infl V will arrive The surface structure for the question pattern formed by applying the inversion transformation is given as below. Will the train arrive? Further illustration The XP rule DEEP STRUCTURE Transformations SURFACE STRUCTURE (Note: When transformations are not necessary, the representations of these two levels are the same) 4.6.4 Wh Movement An example in which wh- occupies the subject position What language can you speak ? (S-structure) Wh Movement inversion you can speak what language (D-structure) N Infl V NP An example sentence with a relative clause She has finally found the man whom she loves . (S-structure) Wh Movement she has finally found the man she [loves whom] (S-structure) N VP 4.6.5 Move α and constrains on transformations α(alpha) is a cover term for any element that can be moved from one place two another. (1) Inversion can move an auxiliary front the Infl to the nearest C position, but not to more distant C position. Geoffrey should know [that the train might be late]. (Ds) Infl should Geoffrey CP know [whether the train might be late ](Ss) CP (2)No element may be removed from a coordinate structure. The little girl will tell us [a story or a joke]. * What will the little girl tell us [a story or ]? 4.7 Summary In this part introduced word categories and phrase categories.Then do some analyses of sentence formation: phrase structure rules, deep structure subcategorization, transformations, and surface structure, etc. which enables to combine words into sentences in endlessly novel way. 4.7 Task Do the following as required in groups of four or five: 1. The following sentences all contain embedded clauses that function as complements of a verb, an adjective, a preposition or a noun. Draw a tree structure for each sentence. a) You know that I hate war. b) He said that Tom asked whether the class was over. c) Gerry can’t believe the fact that Anna flunked the English exam. d) Chris was happy that his father bought him a Rolls-Royce. e) The children argued over whether bats had wings. 2. Each of the following sentences contains a relative clause. Draw the deep structure and the surface structure trees for each of these sentences. a) The essay that he wrote was too long. b) ]The dog that he keeps bites c) Herbert found the man she loved. d) The girl whom he often quarrels with majors in linguistics. 3. The derivations of the following sentences involve the inversion transformation. Give the deep structure and the surface structure of each of these sentences. a) Would you come tomorrow? b) Can you pass me the newspaper? c) Should the student report the incident? d) What did you eat for lunch? e) Who should this be reported to? f) What was Helen bringing to the party? 7.2 Cohesion and cohesiveness • Cohesion is a concept to do with discourse or text rather than with syntax. It refers to relations of meaning that exist within the text, and defines it as a text. • Cohesiveness can be realized by employing various cohesive devices: – conjunction – ellipsis – lexical collocation – lexical repetition – reference – substitution, etc. 101 • “Did she get there at six?” “No, (she got there) earlier (than six).” (Ellipsis) • “Shall we invite Bill?” “No. 1 can’t stand the man.” (Lexical collocation) • He couldn’t open the door. It was locked tight. (Reference) • “Why don’t you use your own recorder?” “I don't have one.” (Substitution) • I wanted to help him. Unfortunately it was too late. (Logical connection) 102 Chapter 4 Syntax • • • • • • • 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Word Class 4.3 The Prescriptive Approach 4.4 The Descriptive Approach 4.5 Constituent Structure Grammar 4.6 Transformational Grammar 4.7 Systemic Functional Grammar Phrase rules • The rules which govern the structure of phrases are known as phrase rules or rewrite rules. (p 72) • For example: • Art.+ adv. +adj. + N • Demon.(指示代词)+ adj.+ N (this big house) Phrase structure rules 短语结构规则 p72 • The grammatical mechanism that regulates the arrangement of elements that make up a phrase is called a phrase structure rule, such as: • NP (Det) + N +(PP)……e.g. those people, the fish on the plate, pretty girls. • VP (Qual限定词) + V + (NP)……e.g. always play games, finish assignments. • AP (Deg程度) + A + (PP)……very handsome, very pessimistic, familiar with, very close to • PP (Deg) + P + (NP)……on the shelf, in the boat, quite near the station. Phrase categories and phrase structures • Phrase categories----the syntactic units that are built around a certain word category are called phrase categories, such as NP(N), VP(V), AP(A), PP(P). • Phrase structure: a representation of the set of constituents that an expression contains. • The structure: specifier + head + complement • Head---- the word around which a phrase is formed • Specifier指示语---- the words on the left side of the heads • Complement补语---- the words on the right side of the heads • More… X’ Theory • XP (Specifier)X’ • X’ X(complement) XP(Phrase level) X’ specifier X(head) complement Generative Grammar 生成语法 p72 • 乔姆斯基用生成语法一词来简明地表示 “一套用来给句子进行结构描写、定义明 确严格的规则系统”。乔姆斯基认为任何 一种语言的说话者都掌握并且内化了一种 有生成能力的语法,这套语法能够表达他 的语言知识。“于是,生成语法试图明确 说明说话者实际了解掌握什么,而不是他 根据他掌握的东西去说什么”。(胡, 2002: 341) Transformational Generative Grammar (TG) • Noam. Chomsky, the most influential linguist in 20th century, some important works: • (1957) Syntactic Structure; • (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax; • (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding; • (1986) Barriers • (1993) A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory; • (1995) The Minimalist Program; • (1998) The Minimalist Inquiry…… • • • • Chomsky is much more interested in the similarities (language universals) between languages rather than their differences. Linguists should attempt to find a grammatical framework which will be suitable for all languages; Linguists should concentrate on the elements and constructions that are available to all languages rather than on elements that actually occur in all languages. There are likely to be universal constraints on the ways linguistic elements are combined Chomsky proposed that the grammars of all human languages share a common framework (Universal Grammar). 句法学派 • • • • • 传统学派 结构主义学派 生成学派 功能学派 胡,2002:91-122 • 胡壮麟,《语言学教程》(修订版中译本) 电子版地址:http://www.docin.com/p69127272.html 传统学派 • 传统学派认为句子是词的序列。因此句子 构造的研究涉及了对词的大量研究。词类 和功能有时叫做范畴。但是“范畴”这个 术语,更专门用于表示像名词、动词这些 单位的特征。(胡,2002:91) • 这些范畴包括数、性、格,时和体,一致 关系和支配关系的讨论。 结构主义学派 • 结构主义学派的创始人是二十世纪初瑞士 语言学家费尔迪南 德 索绪尔。在某种意义 上,他之后的所有语言学理论都属于结构 主义。他们都认为语言单位是在一种结构 (或)系统中相互关联的,不是孤立的。 (胡,2002:94) • 在句法学的讨论中,结构主义学派的讨论 主要围绕组合关系和聚合关系,直接成分 分析法,向心结构和离心结构展开。 生成学派 • 我们用生成学派特指由美国语言学家诺姆 乔姆斯基创立的一种语言学理论。这一理 论从1957年提出以后经历了许多次改变。 (胡,2002:104) • 涉及到句法学的讨论论题有深层结构和表 层结构,标准理论及以后的发展,管辖和 约束等。 功能学派 • 在过去的四十多年中,虽然生成学派的影响很 大,但我们也不能忽视另一个重要的语言研究 学派:功能学派。。这两个学派,一个是形式 的,现在的代表人物是乔姆斯基,另一个是功 能的,…,自从几千年前开始研究语言以来就一 直存在。甚至在转换生成语法的全盛时期,功 能学派这边仍然发出了有力的声音。(胡, 2002:117-118) • 此书中只介绍了功能句子观和系统功能语法。 4.3 The Prescriptive Approach • 规定性取向 • Traditional Grammar: 18th century, England, prescriptive • E.g. 1. You must not split infinitives. • 2. You must not end a sentence with a preposition. • 3. You must not begin a sentence with “and”. • 4. You must not end a sentence with a preposition. • The view of setting rules for the “proper” use of language is characterized as the prescriptive approach. • p73 4.4 The Descriptive Approach • Background information: • 结构主义学派的创始人是二十世纪初瑞士语言学家费尔迪南 德 索绪尔。 在某种意义上,他之后的所有语言学理论都属于结构主义。他们都认为 语言单位是在一种结构(或系统)中相互关联的,不是孤立的。 (胡, 2002:94) • Descriptive approach(描写法):Linguists collect samples of the language they are interested in and attempt to describe the regular structures of the language it is used. p74 • Definition: Its main objective is to study the distribution of linguistic forms in a language. 4.4.1 Structural analysis • Objective: to study the distribution of linguistic forms in a language. • Method: test-frame--sentences with empty slots • P 74 • e.g. • The is smiling. • 横线中填的词有什么限制么? • 有。1. 必须是有声名词。2. 含有“人类”语义 的有声名词。3. 单数形式。 Limitation of IC analysis • 1. Elements in a construction can be discontinuous. • 2.It could not show relations between sentences that seem to be closely connected. 2. 发展过程 • • • • • 2.1 古典理论 2.2 标准理论 2.3 扩展的标准理论 2.4 后期理论 胡,2002: 342-353 2.1 古典理论 classical theory • 目标:把语言学变成一门科学 • 特征:强调语言的生成能力;引入了转换原 则;语法描写中不考虑语义。 • 三套语法:有限状态语法,短语结构语法, 转换语法。 • 古典理论是把语言描写形式化的开端。但无 论乔姆斯基在借用数学符号和简化分析手续 上作出多大努力,这套理论还是存在不少缺 陷。 Classical theory • A model with three parts: • 1. a set of phrase structure rules, 2. transformation rules and 3. morphophonemic rules. • p83 2.2 标准理论 • 乔姆斯基的《句法理论若干问题》(1965) 标志着标准理论时期的到来。 • 生成语法应该包括三部分:句法部分,音 系部分和语义部分。 Auxiliary movement (inversion) • Inversion Move Infl to the left of the subject NP. • Inversion (revised) Move Infl to C. CP S NP C Det the N Infl train will V arrive Auxiliary movement (inversion) CP S C Infl Det Will the NP N Infl train e V arrive Do insertion • Do insertion---- Insert interrogative do into an empty Infl position. CP S C NP Infl Birds VP fly Figure-1 CP CP S C NP Infl Birds do Figure-2 VP fly S C Infl NP Infl Do birds e Figure-3 VP fly Wh-movement • Consider the derivation of the following sentences: What languages can you speak? What can you talk about? • These sentences may originate as: You can speak what languages. You can talk about what. Wh-movement • Wh-movement---- Move a wh phrase to the beginning of the sentence. • What language can you speak ? • What can you talk about ? Wh-movement • Wh-movement---- Move a wh phrase to the specifier position under CP. (Revised) CP S NP Who C VP NP e Infl Pst V won NP the game Move α and constraints on transformations • Inversion can move an auxiliary from the Infl to the nearest C position, but not to a more distant C position. • No element may be removed from a coordinate structure. 4.7 Systemic Functional Grammar • 韩礼德提出语言元功能的理论,即,语言有概 念功能、人际功能和语篇功能。概念功能建构 了经验模型和逻辑关系,人际功能反映了社会 关系,语篇功能则创立了语言与语境的关联。 (胡,2002:8) • 元语言功能:语言可以用来讨论它自己。(胡, 2002:12) • Relating the various kinds of linguistic structures and patterns to the functions that language serves and to the social settings in which it is used. p87 Metafunction • • • • • M.A.K.Halliday 语言元功能:用来讨论语言本身。 Ideational function 概念功能 Textual function 语篇功能 Interpersonal function 人际功能 1. Ideational function 概念功能 • The function of conceptualizing the world for our own benefit and that of others • We bring the world into being linguistically. Different processes of verbs • • • • • • The boy kicked the post. The man liked the new house. The child is homeless. The girl laughed. The visitor said “hello”. There is a girl over there. The boy kicked the post. • • • • • Material process Doing verbs Present continuous Actor 动作者-boy Goal 目标-post The man liked the new house. • • • • Mental process Internal, stative verbs Sensor感觉者-man Phenomenon被感知的现象-the new house Chapter Four From Word to Text 138 • Syntax is the study of the rules governing the ways different constituents are combined to form sentences in a language, or the study of the interrelationships between elements in sentence structures. 139 2. Grammatical construction and its constituents 2.1 Grammatical Construction • Any syntactic string of words ranging from sentences over phrasal structures to certain complex lexemes. – an apple – ate an apple – Mary ate an apple 140 2.2 Constituents and Phrase Structure • Constituent is a part of a larger linguistic unit. Several constituents together form a construction: – the girl (NP) – ate the apple (VP) – the girl ate the apple (S) Immediate Constituent Analysis (IC Analysis) The girl ate the apple 142 Phrase Structure Tree diagram S NP Det N VP V NP Det N The girl ate the apple 143 Word-level Phrasal N=noun A=adjective V=verb P=preposition Det=determiner Adv=adverb Conj=conjunction NP=noun phrase AP=adjective phrase VP=verb phrase PP=preposition phrase S=sentence or clause 144 Bracketing • Bracketing is not as common in use, but it is an economic notation in representing the constituent/phrase structure of a grammatical unit. – (((The) (girl)) ((ate) ((the) (apple)))) – [S[NP[Det The][N girl]][VP[V ate][NP[Det the][N apple]]]] 145 2.3 Endocentric and Exocentric Constructions • Endocentric construction is one whose distribution is functionally equivalent to that of one or more of its constituents, i.e., a word or a group of words, which serves as a definable centre or head. – Usually noun phrases, verb phrases and adjective phrases belong to endocentric types because the constituent items are subordinate to the Head. 146 147 • Exocentric construction refers to a group of syntactically related words where none of the words is functionally equivalent to the group as a whole, that is, there is no definable “Centre” or “Head” inside the group, usually including – the basic sentence, – the prepositional phrase, – the predicate (verb + object) construction, and – the connective (be + complement) construction. 148 • The boy smiled. (Neither constituent can substitute for the sentence structure as a whole.) • He hid behind the door. (Neither constituent can function as an adverbial.) • He kicked the ball. (Neither constituent stands for the verb-object sequence.) • John seemed angry. (After division, the connective construction no longer exists.) 149 2.4 Coordination and Subordination • Endocentric constructions fall into two main types, depending on the relation between constituents: 150 Subordination • Subordination refers to the process or result of linking linguistic units so that they have different syntactic status, one being dependent upon the other, and usually a constituent of the other. – The subordinate constituents are words which modify the head. Consequently, they can be called modifiers. 151 • two dogs Head • (My brother) can drink (wine). Head • Swimming in the lake (is fun). Head • (The pepper was) hot beyond endurance. Head 152 Subordinate clauses • Clauses can be used as subordinate constituents. There are three basic types of subordinate clauses: – complement clauses – adjunct (or adverbial) clauses – relative clauses 153 • John believes [that the airplane was invented by an Irishman]. (complement clause) • Elizabeth opened her presents [before John finished his dinner]. (adverbial clause) • The woman [that I love] is moving to the south. (relative clause) 154 3. Syntactic Function • The syntactic function shows the relationship between a linguistic form and other parts of the linguistic pattern in which it is used. – Names of functions are expressed in terms of subjects, objects, predicators, modifiers, complements, etc. 155 3.1 Subject • In some languages, subject refers to one of the nouns in the nominative case. • The typical example can be found in Latin, where subject is always in nominative case, such as pater and filius in the following examples. – pater filium amat (the father loves the son) – patrum filius amat (the son loves the father) 156 • In English, the subject of a sentence is often said to be the agent, or the doer of the action, while the object is the person or thing acted upon by the agent. – This definition seems to work for these sentences: – Mary slapped John. ■ A dog bit Bill. 157 • but is clearly wrong in the following examples: – John was bitten by a dog. – John underwent major heart surgery. • In order to account for the case of subject in passive voice, we have two other terms “grammatical subject” (John) and “logical subject” (a dog). 158 • Another traditional definition of the subject is “what the sentence is about” (i.e., topic). • Again, this seems to work for many sentences, such as – Bill is a very crafty fellow. • but fails in others, such as – (Jack is pretty reliable, but) Bill I don’t trust. – As for Bill, I wouldn’t take his promises very seriously. 159 • All three sentences seem to be “about” Bill; thus we could say that Bill is the topic of all three sentences. • The above sentences make it clear that the topic is not always the grammatical subject. • What characteristics do subjects have? 160 Word order • Subject ordinarily precedes the verb in the statement: – Sally collects stamps. – *Collects Sally stamps. 161 Pro-forms • The first and third person pronouns in English appear in a special form when the pronoun is a subject, which is not used when the pronoun occurs in other positions: – He loves me. – I love him. – We threw stones at them. – They threw stones at us. 162 Agreement with the verb • In the simple present tense, an -s is added to the verb when a third person subject is singular, but the number and person of the object or any other element in the sentence have no effect at all on the form of the verb: – She angers him. – They anger him. – She angers them. 163 Content questions • If the subject is replaced by a question word (who or what), the rest of the sentence remains unchanged, as in – John stole the Queen’s picture from the British Council. – Who stole the Queen’s picture from the British council? 164 When any other element of the sentence is replaced by a question word, an auxiliary verb must appear before the subject. – What would John steal, if he had the chance? – What did John steal from the British Council? – Where did John steal the Queen’s picture from? 165 Tag question • A tag question is used to seek confirmation of a statement. It always contains a pronoun which refers back to the subject, and never to any other element in the sentence. – John loves Mary, doesn’t he? – Mary loves John, doesn’t she? – *John loves Mary, doesn’t she? 166 3.2 Predicate • Predicate refers to a major constituent of sentence structure in a binary analysis in which all obligatory constituents other than the subject were considered together. • It usually expresses actions, processes, and states that refer to the subject. – The boy is running. (process) – Peter broke the glass. (action) – Jane must be mad! (state) • The word predicator is suggested for verb or verbs included in a predicate. 167 3.3 Object • Object is also a term hard to define. Since, traditionally, subject can be defined as the doer of the action, object may refer to the “receiver” or “goal” of an action, and it is further classified into Direct Object and Indirect Object. – Mother bought a doll. – Mother gave my sister a doll. IO DO 168 • In some inflecting languages, object is marked by case labels: the accusative case for direct object, and the dative case for indirect object. – In English, “object” is recognized by tracing its relation to word order (after the verb and preposition) and by inflections (of pronouns). – Mother gave a doll to my sister. – John kicked me. 169 • Modern linguists suggest that object refers to such an item that it can become subject in a passive transformation. – John broke the glass. The glass was broken by John. – Peter saw Jane. Jane was seen by Peter. 170 • Although there are nominal phrases in the following, they are by no means objects because they cannot be transformed into passive voice. – He died last week. – The match lasted three hours. – He changed trains at Manchester. (*Trains were changed by him at Manchester.) 171 4. Category • The term category refers to the defining properties of these general units: – Categories of the noun: number, gender, case and countability – Categories of the verb: tense, aspect, voice 172 4.1 Number • Number is a grammatical category used for the analysis of word classes displaying such contrasts as singular, dual, plural, etc. – In English, number is mainly observed in nouns, and there are only two forms: singular and plural, such as dog: dogs. – Number is also reflected in the inflections of pronouns and verbs, such as He laughs: They laugh, this man: these men. 173 • In other languages, for example, French, the manifestation of number can also be found in adjectives and articles. – le cheval royal (the royal horse) – les chevaux royaux (the royal horses) 174 4.2 Gender • Such contrasts as “masculine : feminine : neuter”, “animate : inanimate”, etc. for the analysis of word classes. – Though there is a correlation between natural gender and grammatical gender, the assignment may seem quite arbitrary in many cases. – For instance, in Latin, ignis ‘fire’ is masculine, while flamma ‘flame’ is feminine. 175 • English gender contrast can only be observed in pronouns and a small number of nouns, and, they are mainly of the natural gender type. – he: she: it – prince: princess – author: authoress 176 • In French, gender is manifested also both in adjectives and articles. – beau cadeau (fine gift) – belle maison (fine house) – Le cadeau est beau. (The gift is good.) – La maison est belle. (The house is beautiful.) 177 • Sometimes gender changes the lexical meaning as well, for example, in French: – le poele (the stove) – la poele (the frying pan) – le pendule (the pendulum) – la pendule (the clock) 178 4.3 Case • The case category is used in the analysis of word classes to identify the syntactic relationship between words in a sentence. – In Latin grammar, cases are based on variations in the morphological forms of the word, and are given the terms “accusative”, “nominative”, “dative”, etc. – There are five cases in ancient Greek and eight in Sanskrit. Finnish has as many as fifteen formally distinct cases in nouns, each with its own syntactic function. 179 • In English, case is a special form of the noun which frequently corresponds to a combination of preposition and noun, and it is realized in three channels: – inflection – following a preposition – word order • as manifested in – teacher : teacher’s – with : to a man – John kicked Peter : Peter kicked John 180 4.4 Agreement • Agreement (or concord) may be defined as the requirement that the forms of two or more words of specific word classes that stand in specific syntactic relationship with one another shall also, be characterized by the same paradigmatically marked category (or categories). 181 • This syntactic relationship may be anaphoric, as when a pronoun agrees with its antecedent, – Whose is this pen? --Oh, it’s the one I lost. • or it may involve a relation between a head and its dependent, as when a verb agrees with its subject and object: – Each person may have one coin. 182 • Agreement of number between nouns and verbs: – This man runs. – These men run. The bird flies. These birds fly. 183 5. Phrase, Clause and Sentence Sentence Clause Phrase Word 184 • the three tallest girls (nominal phrase) • has been doing (verbal phrase) • extremely difficult (adjectival phrase) • to the door (prepositional phrase) • very fast (adverbial phrase) 185 Clause Finite Non-finite Subject Object Infinitive Adverbial Relative Participial Appositional Complement Gerundial 186 • • • • • • • • The best thing would be to leave early. It’s great for a man to be free. Having finished their task, they came to help us. John being away, Bill had to do the work. Filled with shame, he left the house. All our savings gone, we started looking for jobs. It’s no use crying over spilt milk. Do you mind my opening the window? 187 Sentence: traditional approach simple Sentence complex non-simple compound 188 Sentence: functional approach Yes/no Interrogative Indicative whDeclarative Sentence Jussive Imperative Optative 189 Basic sentence types: Bolinger • Mother fell. (Nominal + intransitive verbal) • Mother is young. (Nominal + copula + complement) • Mother loves Dad. (Nominal + transitive verbal + nominal). • Mother fed Dad breakfast. (Nominal + transitive verbal + nominal + nominal) • There is time. (There + existential + nominal) 190 Outline 4. 1 Definition 4. 2 Word-level categories 4. 3 Phrase categories 4. 4 Phrase structure rule 4. 5 Sentences (The S rule) 4. 6 Transformations 4. 7 Task 4.1 Definition It’s a kind of micro linguistics that studies how words are combined to form sentences and the rules that govern the formation of sentences. (Transformational syntax to be introduced in the book.)