* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Describe and evaluate the historical and cultural conditions that
Psychometrics wikipedia , lookup
Developmental psychology wikipedia , lookup
Social psychology wikipedia , lookup
Milgram experiment wikipedia , lookup
Cultural psychology wikipedia , lookup
Music psychology wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical psychology wikipedia , lookup
Conservation psychology wikipedia , lookup
International psychology wikipedia , lookup
Subfields of psychology wikipedia , lookup
Cross-cultural psychology wikipedia , lookup
Learning theory (education) wikipedia , lookup
Psychophysics wikipedia , lookup
Educational psychology wikipedia , lookup
Vladimir J. Konečni wikipedia , lookup
History of psychology wikipedia , lookup
Behaviorism wikipedia , lookup
Experimental psychology wikipedia , lookup
Psychological behaviorism wikipedia , lookup
Describe and evaluate the historical and cultural conditions that gave rise to the Learning Perspective. Learning perspective is a hypothetical construct, and describes a process that cannot be directly observed, but merely inferred based on observable behavior (Carter, 2008). Behaviorism is dominated by two primary types of conditioning: classical and operant (instrumental). Classical conditioning, which was first developed by Ivan Pavlov, describes the repetition of using a stimulus in order to elicit a desired response. Operant conditioning on the other hand, is based on consequences of actions. For example, if an action is positively reinforced, gradually it becomes learned, and vice versa. In order to examine the birth and development of the learning perspective, it is essential to look at the various theorists, their ideas and contribution to the world of Psychology. Present amongst these behaviorists are conflicts between ideas, development of each others’ ideas as well as production of entirely novel ideas. One of the first influential psychologists, René Descartes (1596-1650), much like Plato and Aristotle believed in the concept of nativism. Opposing most behaviorists following his work, he believed that knowledge is inbuilt in our biological structure, and therefore learning and experience play relatively small roles in the psychological make-up of a human being (Carter, 2008). Famous for his quote, “I think, therefore I am” (We Didn’t Start the Fire, 2008), Descartes’ ideas were opposing those of the majority of other renowned psychologists. Next in the chronological timeline, John Locke (1632-1704) reinforced the subject of empiricism. This theory suggests that very few qualities, such as reflexes like breathing or sucking (as a baby) are inbuilt. All our knowledge is based on education from experiences. Further emphasizing this point, he claimed that a baby is born with tabula rasa, meaning blank slate, which over time is transformed into knowledge and understanding (Carter 2008). In addition, Locke had a great influence on the age of enlightenment (Age of Enlightenment, Microsoft Encarta, 2008). This period defined the questioning of ideas that had previously been taken for granted and opening one’s mind to the possibilities of new explanations and answers. The rise of the learning perspective links directly with this, as the concept of searching for explanations in the area of psychology was just commencing as well. The father of experimental psychology (We Didn’t Start the Fire), Wilhelm Wundt (1832-1920) played a crucial role in the development of the learning perspective, as well the concept of psychology itself. Firstly, he introduced the idea of introspection or the analysis of inner ideas and experiences in order to study psychological phenomenon. Moreover, the idea of running controlled experiments to test hypotheses or research questions was founded primarily by Wundt. Much like Locke, he also supported the concept of empiricism, or the acquisition of knowledge through experience (Carter, 2008). He was also able to distinguish psychology as an individual science, as well as establish the first institute for studying psychology. Finally, he opened the first fully functioning psychology laboratory in 1879 as well (We Didn’t Start the Fire, 2008). These achievements, amongst others are what leave Wundt’s mark on the world of psychology today. Known best for his theory of evolution, Charles Darwin (1809-1880) is another important and widely studied behaviorist of the nineteenth century. Primarily, he studied the biological or inherent changes observed in a species over hundreds of years (Carter 2008). Not only did he study evolution, but also built up the idea of natural selection, also known as survival of the fittest. He later published a book called ‘The Origin of Species’ which turned out to be the source of a great deal of controversy, as it questioned the Bible’s claim of the creation of man (We Didn’t Start the Fire, 2008). Furthermore, in continuing Wilhelm Wundt’s work in experimental psychology, Darwin pointed out the idea of experimenter bias, where the experimenter may influence the results, by for example revealing his hypothesis to the subject of the test. Finally, he justified the use of animals in experiments with the idea of anthropomorphism. This expresses the attribution of human characteristics to animals or other inanimate objects (Carter, 2008). Overall, Darwin’s ideas and theories remain controversial and crucial topics even in our world today. Edward Thorndike (1874-1949) first introduced the concept of operant or instrumental conditioning. He claimed that animals learn by trial and error, and can be conditioned with the use of positive or negative reinforcers (Carter, 2008). For example, in the case of Thorndike’s famous Puzzle Box, he kept an animal trapped in this cage, with a lever or button which would open the cage and allow the animal to escape. In a particular experiment, he found that animals would use any object in reach in order to accomplish the task (in this case press the lever), such as piling up planks of wood to extend their reach. Soon, the animal learns that pressing the lever lets them escape, which acts as the positive reinforcement. Eventually, this action is learned and therefore the animal has been conditioned to press the lever (Reinemeyer, Erika. 1999). Thorndike also pointed out that the time taken to escape decreased every time the experiment was conducted. Through this testing, he introduced the Law of Effect, which states that if the trial and error leads to success, the action is likely to be reproduced. However, a failure is unlikely to be repeated. Finally, he stated that what is learned most recently will be carried out best, which is know as the Law of Recency (Carter, 2008). One of the first theorists who supported the idea of classical conditioning was Ivan Pavlov (1849-1936). Beginning his career in the field of science, he was studying the digestive system in dogs. This then developed into his most famous experiment, where he tested the conditioning of salivation of dogs. Divided into three basic stages, the experiment describes how a dog’s reflex to produce saliva can be conditioned without having to actually produce food. During the first stage, food (the unconditioned stimulus) is brought in front of the dog, producing saliva (the unconditioned response); at this point, no learning has taken place. Next, along with the food, a bell is rung (the conditioned stimulus), again producing the same unconditioned response of salivation; this stage describes the process of learning. Finally, only the bell is rung and the dog still produces saliva, which means the bell is now the conditioned stimulus, and therefore eliciting the saliva makes salivation the conditioned response. At this point, the reflex has been learned. The law of recency also comes into play, because if the bell is repeatedly rung, and there is no reinforcement in the form of food, the conditioned response becomes unlearned. Pavlov’s basic principle was that for learning to take place, there needs to be a stimulus which affects one’s senses (Carter, 2008). He defined the conditioned reflex as “elementary psychological phenomenon” (Nobel Lectures, 1967). Having studied this, Pavlov later continued exploring the physiology of reflexes in animals. Another behaviorist who worked in the field of classical conditioning was John Watson (1878-1958). His most renowned experiment is known as the Little Albert experiment. Just like Pavlov, he is testing the use of stimuli in order to elicit a desired response. He used a young child, and presented him with a rat and bunny, both of which act as unconditioned stimuli. This makes him happy, which is therefore the unconditioned response. Next, the learning stage pertains making a loud and unpleasant noise (conditioned stimulus) just when the rat is presented. As expected, this made the young boy cry, which is still an unconditioned response. After a certain amount of repetition, Watson is able to make Albert cry just by producing the rat. The rat becomes the conditioned stimulus, and the child crying in turn is the conditioned response. Another observation made by Watson was that presenting any similar object, such as a fur coat, elicited the same response. The main issue surrounding this experiment is the concept of ethics. While back then, this was not considered an unethical or inhumane experiment today he would not be permitted to conduct such a test. Watson disagreed with Wilhelm Wundt, in that, he believed that anything that is not observable is not worth studying, and so he was against the idea of introspection altogether. The same concept goes for the existence of mind, where he argues that conscious thought cannot be studied visually either. Later in his work, he went quite extreme and claimed that the concept of the mind was entirely non-existent as well. Watson also utilized Darwinism in several of his experiments, which represents the continuity between animals and humans. Finally, he combated experimenter bias with the claim that in order for an experiment to be proved valid, it needs to be analyzed by various theorists in order to avoid objectivity of any sort (Carter, 2008). He believed very strongly in his theories of conditioning, which is demonstrated by the famous quote, “Give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own specified world to bring them up in and I'll guarantee to take any one at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select – doctor, lawyer, artist, merchant- chief and, yes, even beggar-man and thief, regardless of his talents, penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations, and race of his ancestors. I am going beyond my facts and I admit it, but so have the advocates of the contrary and they have been doing it for many thousands of years.” (John B. Watson, Wikipedia 2008) Finally, the last behaviorist to look at is B.F. Skinner (1904-1990), an operant conditioner. He believed that all complex behaviors can be broken into smaller, simpler ones. This was illustrated through the use of pigeons, as he displayed that he could condition them to roll a black ball to and from each other, with the use of positive or negative reinforcement. Much like Watson, he also believed that internal mental thoughts are not observable and so are not useful to analyze (We Didn’t Start the Fire, 2008). One of his most eminent contraptions is know as the Skinner box, which in several ways resembles that of Thorndike’s puzzle box. In it, he kept an animal trapped, with a lever or button that provided some sort of positive reinforcement. One particular experiment describes a starved rat trapped in this cage, and when it presses the lever, a small pellet of food is dropped into the cage. This acts as positive reinforcement for the rat, and therefore encourages it to repeat this action. Slowly, it becomes learned or conditioned into the rat (Rubin, Julian 2007). There are various outlooks, theories and conflicts provided by a wide range of behaviorists, which over the course of approximately four hundred hours gave rise to the learning perspective. Conflicts arise between operant and classical conditioning, the existence or validity of studying the existence of mind, nativism versus empiricism, and many more. The experiments conducted in order to prove these theories help us understand how each aspect of behaviorism is justified and how or why it is or isn’t true. Having studied a wide range of behaviorists makes it clear as to how the concept of behaviorism came to be. Bibliography "Age of Enlightenment." Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopaedia . 2008. 12 Oct. 2008 http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761571679/Age_of_Enlightenment.html Understood the role of John Locke in the age of enlightenment, and how that links in with the birth of the Learning Perspective. Brausch, Amy, and Alesia Hawkins. "We Didn't Start The Fire." History of Psychology . Northern Illinois University. lO Oct. 2OO8 http://www3.niu.edu/acad/psych/Millis/History/2OO4/PsychologySong.htm#Rene%2 ODescartes Provides an overview of several psychologists: Rene Descartes, Wilhelm Wundt, Charles Darwin and B.F. Skinner. Some quotes, some general information on experiments, etc. "Ivan Pavlov - Biography." Nobel Lectures. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Company, l967. Rpt. in Les Prix Nobel. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Nobel Prize.org. l9O4. The Nobel Foundation. l3 Oct. 2OO8 http://nobelprize.orgnobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/l9O4/pavlov-bio.html Helped understand how he moved from the field of medicine into psychology and detail of his theories as well. "John B. Watson." Wikipedia. 9 Oct. 2OO8. l2 Oct. 2OO8 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_B._Wats on I used the famous quote about 12 random infants. Reinemeyer, Erika. Edward Lee Thorndike. May l999. l3 Oct. 2OO8 http://www.muskingum.edu/~psych/psycweb/history/thor ndike.htm Path: Psychology;Psychology History;Thorndike. Found detailed informatio about the theory behind Thorndike's Puzzle Box. Rubin, Julian. "From Pavlov to Skinner Box." Following The Path of Discovery. Sept. 2OO7. l2 Oct. 2OO8 http://www.juliantrubin.com/bigten/skinnerbox.html . Explains the concept of Skinner's Box.