* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download AIA MN COTE March 17, 2016 Climate Change Statement
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Energiewende in Germany wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Canada wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
American Institute of Architects Minnesota CliCl Climate Change + Resilient Design Statement Endorsed October 7, 2004 by the AIA Minnesota Board of Directors as the “Climate Change Position Statement” ROUGH IDEAS DRAFT March 16, 2016 | Doug Pierce In October 2003, a U.S. Pentagon report stated, There is substantial evidence to indicate that significant global warming will occur during the 21st century. 1 Scientists project that climate change threatens dangerous consequences, including more severe droughts and floods, loss of ecosystems, and damage to industries that rely on natural resources, such as agriculture, forestry, and tourism’ In 2009(?) all the worlds' National Academies of Science agreed that "The need for urgent action to address climate change is now indisputable” 2015 was the hottest year on record – NASA / NOAA http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-noaa-analyses-reveal-record-shattering-global-warm-temperaturesin-2015 . Geologists are preparing to proclaim a new epoch in the history of the world, the Anthropocene. An epoch in which human activity, creativity and productivity were the number one influencing factors on the earth’s biosphere and life on the planet. As a result human activity, our climate is changing at an alarming rate, the world’s wildlife has been reduced by over 51% in the past 40 years and we are currently experiencing the 6th period of mass extinction (the 5th being the Cretaceous where dinosaurs and about 50% of life went extinct). Even with all of the human activity and economic expansion, in the past 30 years, the rate of poverty worldwide population has gone virtually unchanged with about 50% of the population moving up from living on $2.00 day to $2.50 day. The vast majority of this change can be attributed to rapid economic growth in China. Most Americans would recognize the poverty line to be at about $10 day or less per person. Business as usual is not a viable option if humanity and the rest of life on planet earth is to have a meaningful present + future. Dramatic change is a given and we can either creatively + thoughtfully adapt and influence that change or we can simply be impacted by it. The human activity driving the dramatic changes to the planet are a result of our species native capacity to create. Creativity is native to humans and it is our specie’s most essential survival skill. It is as natural and emergent in homo sapiens as is the capacity of bees to make honey or spiders to make silk. Since the development and use of Nuclear weapons during World War II and at present, the threat of climate change, it has become clear that we can use our creative capacity with wisdom and foresight or we can squander it through huberous, excess and a blantant disregard for the greater whole of life. As one of humanities most direct forms of creative expression, Architecture and design have an important role to play in shaping our collective present and future. Both that of humanity and the rest of nature which is now at our mercy. Good intentions aside, Architecture + Design offers its highest + best value to society, the human economy and our immediate clients when we solve essential + foundational problem; generate accountable + productive socio-physical outcomes; and increase the quality of all life physically + emotionally now and into the future.. Solving for any one of these independently can frequently be accomplished with the application of straight forward creative activity delivered by a wide range of entities. However, solving for two or more importantly all three together requires the thoughtful and accomplished use of creativity. In short it requires design. The conscious application of humanities most essential gift: Creativity. Design is a value added creative activity and it has no value, if it cannot solve integrative, complex problems through thoughtful and well crafted interventions. As human society progresses throught the modern era, it continues to elevate it’s complexity. 1 of 2 Design to must elevate it’s capacity to solve complexity. That premise is a foundational element of what makes design valued to society and our immediate clients. The modern profession of architecture and design can arguabely be considered Policy Statement: Buildings are major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions; therefore, taking action to reduce the impact of buildings on climate change is part of the architecture profession s commitment to protecting the health, safety and welfare of the public. Climate change results primarily from activities that release heat-trapping greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) into the atmosphere. CO2 is the primary greenhouse gas. Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 and CH4 have been increasing for about two centuries as a result of human activities and are now higher than they have been for over 400,000 years.2 Since 1750, CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere have increased by 30 percent and CH4 concentrations in the atmosphere have increased by 150 percent.2 The main sources of CO2 include burning fossil fuels such as coal, gas, and oil, and deforestation. Seventy-five percent of Minnesota s electricity is produced by coal-fired power plants,3 and buildings consume 65% of that electricity.4 Based on current scientific information about the causes and impacts of climate change, the Members, Officers and Board of Directors of the American Institute of Architects Minnesota herein affirm that AIA Minnesota will advocate for design practices and government policies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We are committed to the challenging goal of reducing climate change impacts in the state of Minnesota. Historically, the American Institute of Architects (AIA) has been a leader in supporting changes that improve our built environment. For example, in the early 1930s when engineers developed insulation and a means to manufacture it, the AIA studied the issue and endorsed the concept. This endorsement contributed to launching new industries and re-thinking the way building envelopes are designed, resulting in improved human comfort, increased productivity and greater energy efficiency. Today the AIA has an opportunity to support important changes in the way we build, influencing our quality of life now and in the future. By designing to reduce climate change, we can take a leadership position on one of the most critical issues currently facing our state, our nation and our world. If we do not act to slow global warming, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts that by the year 2100 the earth s average temperature is expected to increase three to ten degrees Fahrenheit.5 Climate change in Minnesota over the next 100 years is projected to occur more than 100 times faster than the change in climate since the last Ice Age.6 In recent decades, the Minnesota fall freeze has been moving later by 1.5 days per decade and spring lake ice-out earlier by 2 days per decade.6 If we act now, we can provide for the health, safety and welfare of the public while having a positive impact on the economy. For example, British Petroleum recently developed an internal strategy for curbing carbon emissions, resulting in a ten percent company-wide reduction in those emissions and a $650 million net boost to the company over a three-year period.7 Germany has created 40,000 jobs manufacturing wind machines8 while cutting its use of coal in half since 1990.9 Minnesota wind power could produce 10 times the electricity our state consumed in 2000 when fully developed.11 Homebuyers could save $81 million a year in energy if their homes were built to be energy-efficient.10 When passed, the U.S. Climate Stewardship Act of 2003 is projected to provide a net GDP increase of $100 billion to the American Economy by 2015.11 2 of 2 The United States has over five million commercial structures and 76 million residential structures.12 These buildings account for 65 percent of U.S. electricity consumption, 36 percent of U.S. primary energy use, and 30 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.4 Over 10 billion square feet of new construction and renovation take place in the U.S. each year.13 The magnitude of the building sector means that decisions about the future design of new and remodeled structures will be a major determinant of total greenhouse gas emissions. The architectural community must be actively engaged in supporting reduced emissions in order to reduce climate change. AIA Minnesota represents the interests of architects before local, state and national policy-making bodies. AIA Minnesota s active involvement in the political process enables the organization to advocate effectively on legislative, regulatory, and related issues of importance to AIA members. Therefore, AIA Minnesota will join with other Minnesota organizations to support reductions in green house gas emissions by endorsing the Climate Stewardship Act. AIA Minnesota will advocate for greenhouse gas-reducing design practices and government policies that: Require and encourage energy efficient, private residential and commercial buildings while providing for good indoor air and environmental quality; Require and encourage state-bonded buildings to perform 30% better than the Energy Code and meet the B3 Sustainable Guidelines; Require and encourage clean, renewable power sources such as wind, solar and bio-mass and/ or discourage the continued use and/ or construction of fossil fuel-burning power plants; Encourage and support full implementation of the Minnesota Renewable Energy Objectives (REO) and passage of the federal Renewable Electricity Standard (RES); Require and encourage low-impact community design by encouraging municipal and regional planning that embraces the energy efficient transportation of humans, materials and products and provides for carbon fixing through planted open space; Require and encourage material selections that improve energy efficiency and support ecologically sound forest stewardship practices; Require and encourage the immediate reduction of greenhouse gas emissions to levels 60% to 80% below 1990 levels as recommended by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). AIA Minnesota Committee on the Environment 1 Schwartz, Peter and Doug Randall, An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and Its implications for United States National Security, October 2003, Executive Summary 2 Our Changing Planet: The U.S. Climate Change Science Project, United States Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research, A Supplement to President George W. Bush s Federal Budget for Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005, August 2004, page 79. 3 Energy Policy and Conservation Report, Minnesota Department of Commerce, July 2004. 4 U.S. Green Building Council, http://www.usgbc.org/ 5 Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers, U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, September 2001. 6 Confronting Climate Change in the Great Lakes Region: Impacts on Our Communities and Ecosystems, Union of Concerned Scientists, April 2003. 7 Braithwaite, Roger J., Special Report: Global Warming, Business Week, August 16, 2004. 8 Noble, Michael, Designing an Energy Future: We Choose the Climate Our Children will Inherit, AIA-MN Convention, November 21, 2003. 9 Larsen, Janet, Coal Takes Heavy Human Toll, Earth Policy Institute, August 24, 2004. 10 New Alliance to Save Energy Report Links High Energy Bills, Waste, Pollution to Poor Housing Codes, http://www.ase.org/content/news/detail/648, accessed August 13, 2004. According to a 1998 report from the Alliance to Save Energy, homeowners could save at least $81 million per year if the 36 states in which they live upgraded their energy codes for new home construction to the 1993 Model Energy Code. 11 Redefining Progress: Effects of Global Warming on the State of Minnesota, Environmental Entrepreneurs, May 2004 12 U.S. Department of Energy: Energy Information Administration, www.eia.doe.gov. 13 2003 Buildings Energy Databook, U.S. Department of Energy: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, August 2003. 3 of 2